Japanese Minister Praises Hitler, Says He Had “right motives”

THAT NAZI THING IS CATCHING ON IN JAPAN.

The important thing about this story is the reaction from the Simon Wiesenthal Center which claims that Aso’s remarks are “dangerous.”

It’s hard to see how the truth is dangerous, except to those who have created a false narrative. The tribe.

Back around 1980 I told a girl that I knew that I was going to form a punk rock group called Adolf and the Dead Jews, but first I had to grow a Hitler mustache. She was a Jew. I guess I’ve been a troll all my life. I’m just glad the Wiesenthal Center didn’t hear about it.

The Guardian

Japan’s finance minister, Taro Aso, has courted fresh controversy after expressing admiration for the Nazis, describing Adolf Hitler as “having the right motives”.

“Hitler, who killed millions of people, was no good even if his motive was right,” Aso told a meeting of his faction of the governing Liberal Democratic party, according to Jiji Press.

Aso retracted the comments on Wednesday after criticism that he appeared to be defending Hitler’s motives for the genocide of millions of Jews during the second world war.

“It is clear from my overall remarks that I regard Hitler in extremely negative terms, and it’s clear that his motives were also wrong,” Aso said in a statement, adding that he did not intend to defend Hitler, but to stress the importance of politicians achieving results.

“It was inappropriate that I cited Hitler as an example and I would like to retract that.”

TARO ASO. HE TAKES IT ALL BACK.

The Los Angeles-based Simon Wiesenthal Centre, which monitors anti-semitic activities, voiced “distress and disappointment” at the comments.

“This is just the latest of a troubling list of ‘misstatements’ and are downright dangerous,” the centre’s head, rabbi Abraham Cooper, said in a statement.

It is not the first time the gaffe-prone Aso has made controversial remarks about the Nazis.

In 2013, he came under pressure to resign after suggesting that Japan should follow the Nazis’ example when considering how to change its constitution.

Criticising the lack of support among older people for revising Japan’s postwar pacifist constitution, Aso said it could learn from how the Nazi party changed Germany’s constitution by stealth before the second world war.

Since revising Japan’s constitution could trigger protests, Aso suggested “doing it quietly, just as in one day the Weimar constitution changed to the Nazi constitution without anyone realising it. Why don’t we learn from that sort of tactic?”

Nazis march through Berlin waving flag of Hitler’s Third Reich

I REGRET NOTHING.

There seems to be an affection for the Third Reich growing worldwide. Or is it LARPing in order to shock people? Western culture is so degenerate–or as we might say–Jewed–that it takes a lot to shock normies. After all, now we have three year old trans boys who think they’re girls and even furries who think they’re dogs or cats or whatever animal.

If we’re not allowed to judge those three year old trans toddlers, then why the hell is the left allowed to judge Nazis?

metro.co.uk

Hundreds of neo-Nazis took to the streets of Berlin to mark 30 years since the death of Hitler’s deputy Rudolf Hess.

Around 250 white supremacists marched from the Spandau suburb’s station to the former Spandau Prison – where Hess, an early ally of Adolf Hitler, served out the life sentence he was given at the post-war Nuremberg trials for war crimes.

Far-right marchers held up banners reading ‘I regret nothing’, and hoisted the red, white and black flag of Hitler’s Third Reich as around 1,000 police officers looked on.

Neo-Nazis commemorate the 1987 prison suicide of Hitler’s one-time deputy every year.

However, this year’s rally has garnered more attention as it was held in the wake of the atrocity in Charlottesville, Virginia, in which 32-year-old anti-racist counter-protester Heather Heyer was killed.

Anti-fascists gathered at the location of the Berlin vigil to protest, saying the Nazi rally should have been banned.

‘It’s appalling that in the year 2017, Nazis can openly go on the streets for this deputy of Hitler,’ Gerhard Sattler, a protester, said.

‘This is impossible. The whole of German society must stand up against this.’

Photos also show police officers in riot gear violently detaining a counter-protester.

Symbols of the Nazi regime – such as the swastika flag – are already strictly banned in Germany.

But Berlin’s senator for interior affairs said that banning the rally would have been impossible to reconcile with the political freedoms of a democracy.

‘I would have been delighted with a ban,’ interior affairs senator Andreas Geisel said.

‘But we looked very closely at the matter and concluded that, unfortunately, arseholes also get to benefit from democratic freedoms.’

Hess was the last war criminal in Spandau Prison when he killed himself at the age of 93.

He was appointed Hitler’s deputy when the Nazis came to power in 1933, a position he retained until 1941, when he flew to Britain alone because he believed Hitler wanted him to negotiate a peace deal between the two warring countries.

Hess spent the rest of the war in prison in Britain before he was convicted of crimes against the peace at Nuremberg.

The injustice done to Rudolf Hess, assuming he was the real deal, is appalling. I would be willing to protest his mistreatment by the wartime allies and I’m not a Nazi.

Henry Makow has a number of pieces on Rudolf Hess, including this post that Hess was tortured by the British for trying to end the war. Somebody wanted the war to continue and it wasn’t Germany.

Scientists Claim New Clue in Effort to Learn Why Neanderthals Disappeared

ARTIST’S IMPRESSION OF NEANDERTHAL.

Early humans had a diet similar to the Neanderthals. We did not eat as much fish as previously thought, according to this study.

The writer of this article assumes that the “Out of Africa” theory is correct, which is a shortcoming of the article, but not the academic study, which was focused on diet.

Daily Mail

Did Neanderthals die out because of their Paleo diet? New evidence suggests competition for meat with early humans led to their downfall

Scientists have new clues to what happened to the Neanderthals, who lived 300,000 years before suddenly vanishing.

A study of early human fossils found our ancestors dined mostly on mammoth and raw plants, creating a battle for food that Neanderthals ultimately lost.

Research has previously suggested that early humans had a more varied diet than Neanderthals, fishing for their food as well hunting and gathering across the plains.

But the new analysis shows that our ancestors rarely ate fish, preferring a diet very similar to that of their ancient cousins.

The scientists, from from the Senckenberg Centre in Tübingen, southwest Germany, were surprised to find that the proportion of plants in the diet of the anatomically modern humans was far higher than in similar Neanderthal finds.

Mammoths, on the other hand, appear to have been one of the primary sources of meat in both species.

The first homo sapiens reached Europe around 43,000 years ago, replacing the Neanderthals there approximately 3,000 years later.

Study lead author Professor Hervé Bocherens said: ‘Many studies examine the question of what led to this displacement – one hypothesis postulates that the diet of the anatomically modern humans was more diverse and flexible and often included fish.’

Coauthor Dr Dorothée Drucker added: ‘According to our results, Neanderthals and the early modern humans were in direct competition in regard to their diet, as well – and it appears that the Neanderthals drew the short straw in this contest.’

The researchers studied the dietary habits of early modern man using the oldest know fossils from the Buran Kaya caves on the Crimean Peninsula in the Ukraine.

‘In the course of this study, we examined the finds of early humans in the context of the local fauna,’ said study coauthor Dr Dorothée Drucker.

‘Until now, all analyses of the diet of early modern humans were based on isolated discoveries; therefore, they are very difficult to interpret.’

In order to reconstruct our ancestors’ menu – despite the lack of a fossil dietary record – the team measured the ratios of stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes in the bones of the early humans.

They also measured the presence of these isotopes in fossils of local potential prey such as Saiga, horses, and deer.

So, I suppose the bottom line here is to eat meat and vegetables because that’s what our ancient ancestors ate and we’ve evolved to flourish on the same diet.

Canaanites Live: DNA Reveals Fate of Biblical People

CANAANITE BURIAL JAR.

The Jews that populate Israel today aren’t going to be happy hearing this news. Their ancient enemy lives!

Live Science

The people of modern-day Lebanon can trace their genetic ancestry back to the Canaanites, new research finds.

The Canaanites were residents of the Levant (modern-day Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, Israel and Palestine) during the Bronze Age, starting about 4,000 years ago. They’re best known from the Old Testament of the Bible, in which they’re described as the cursed descendants of Canaan, blighted by God because Canaan’s father dishonored his own father, the patriarch Noah. The Canaanites were often in conflict with the Israelite tribes that wrote the Hebrew Bible. In fact, the Book of Deuteronomy features Yahweh (God) ordering the Canaanites to be exterminated.

In part because the Canaanites kept their records on easily degradable papyrus rather than clay, little is known about their side of the story. But now, ancient DNA reveals that the Canaanites were the descendants of Stone Age settlers and the ancestors of the Lebanese. [Biblical Battles: 12 Ancient Wars Lifted from the Bible]

“Canaanite ancestry was widespread in the region,” study researchers Marc Haber and Chris Tyler-Smith of the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute in the United Kingdom wrote in an email to Live Science, “and several groups who were probably culturally different shared the same ancestral background.”

Genetic investigation

Haber, Tyler-Smith and their colleagues extracted ancient DNA from the bones of five Canaanites who died in the ancient city of Sidon (an area now in Lebanon). The skeletons dated from between 3,750 and 3,650 years ago. The researchers then compared the genetic sequences of these ancient Canaanites with those of 99 modern Lebanese people, as well as with ancient DNA sequences of more than 300 other people from an ancient DNA database.

The findings revealed broad overlap between Canaanite genetics and the sequences of modern-day people from Lebanon. Researchers even found some ancient gene variations that suggested the Canaanites probably had similar coloration in skin, eyes and hair as Lebanese people do today. It was surprising, Haber and Tyler-Smith said, to find such continuity in the Canaanite line, given all of the conquests and expansions into the Middle East from outside groups since the Bronze Age.

The Canaanites themselves descended from Stone Age settlers who mixed with newcomers from what is now Iran about 4,000 to 5,000 years ago, the researchers said. This mixture could be explained by the expansion of the Akkadian Empire, a Mesopotamian empire that peaked around that time, the researchers wrote.

After the Bronze Age, the Canaanites did mix a little bit with their neighbors. Modern-day Lebanese populations are largely Canaanite, the DNA showed, with a bit of Eastern hunter-gatherer and Eurasian Steppe influence that got added to the mix some 3,000 years ago, the researchers said.

TRADITIONAL LEBANESE DRESS AND DANCE.

I’m not sure what the significance of these findings are other than to show that it is possible to keep a level of racial purity for thousands of years.

Will some future scientists thousands of years from now be able to isolate Caucasian DNA and say that Caucasians survived our wars?

Feeling overworked? Research reveals medieval peasants had SEVEN TIMES more vacation than the average American employee

I’ve been thinking recently about alternative economic systems.

The current American system is Jewed. More work, less pay. The rich get richer, the poor get poorer. Jewish globalism and crony capitalism are not enshrined in the American constitution.

One of the economic systems I’ve been trying to find time to do more research on is the medieval guild system. By chance, I just found an article in the Daily Mail that revolves around academic research that shows that the medieval worker lived a more natural life than the typical Westerner today. By natural I mean that it’s not natural to spend one’s life stressed by overwork and then die about the time you retire on Social Security.

Daily Mail

Life has got immeasurably better for the average man or woman over the last 700 years, thanks to inventions in technology, medicine, civil liberties and democracy, to name just a few developments.

But it seems that there is one area where the life of a medieval peasant can be envied – their holiday allowance.

The 16-day-a-year vacation of the average American worker is notoriously bad, but compared to the 25 weeks off enjoyed by a 13th century labourer, it is positively shocking.

According to Juliet Schor, Professor of Sociology at Boston College, before capitalism was invented in the 19th century people mainly worked very leisurely days.

In a paper titled The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure, Schor said: ‘A typical working day in the medieval period stretched from dawn to dusk work was intermittent – called to a halt for breakfast, lunch, the customary afternoon nap, and dinner.

‘Depending on time and place, there were also mid-morning and mid-afternoon refreshment breaks.’

And while their working day was easier, according to Schor, they also had far less of them.

She said: ‘The medieval calendar was filled with holidays – official [church] holidays included not only long “vacations” at Christmas, Easter and midsummer but also numerous saints’ and rest days.

‘In addition to official celebrations, there were often weeks’ worth of ales – to mark important life events (bride ales or wake ales) as well as less momentous occasions (scot ale, lamb ale, and hock ale).
‘All told, holiday leisure time in medieval England took up probably about one-third of the year.’

As well as these days off for religious and celebratory purposes, evidence has also shown that people used to take further days off as well.

In her essay, the professor revealed that records from 13th century England show many families only worked 150 days a year on their land and in the 14th century, even servants often only worked 175 days a year.

Compare that to the fact that American workers took an average of 16.2 days of vacation in 2015, according to Project: Time Off, and suddenly medieval England doesn’t seem so bad after all.

My ancestors were all farmers. They enjoyed a great deal of leisure time, even if they weren’t living high on the hog. This comment at the DM is revealing:

Show you how ignorant modern scientists are about rural life. Anyone who has been raised on a farm knows you work hard for three months of every year broken into two periods. Those are planting and then harvest with a couple of days spraying during the growing season. The rest of the year is relatively relaxing with daily feeding of animals IF YOU HAVE them and maintaining buildings and equipment. The rest of your time is spent socializing and watching the crops grow. That pretty much has been farm life for thousands of years.

Belloc’s Prophecy Bodes Ill for the West: The Muslim Challenge

According to the Wikipedia page (link below) on Hilaire Belloc, he was hostile toward the Jews. As far as I’m concerned that makes him a wise and honest man.

Back in the 1930s when the West was at or near its greatest strength, he clearly saw Islam’s rise and challenge to the West.

Lew Rockwell

GRIFFIN INTERNET SYNDICATE, OCTOBER 25, 2001 – Back in the 1930s, when white men were preparing for another round of mutual slaughter, few of them paid any attention to the Muslim world. They assumed it to be a backward region that history had long since passed by.

One man saw it differently. The great Catholic polemicist Hilaire Belloc, an Englishman of French ancestry, remembered Islam’s past and predicted, in his book The Great Heresies, that it would one day challenge the West again. As late as 1683 its armies had threatened to conquer Europe, penetrating all the way to Vienna; Belloc believed that a great Islamic revival, even in the twentieth century, was altogether possible.

Belloc saw Islam not as an alien religion, but in its origins as a Christian heresy, adopting and adapting certain Christian doctrines (monotheism, the immortality of the soul, final judgment) and rejecting others (original sin, the Incarnation and divinity of Christ, the sacraments). Its simple, rational creed had a powerful appeal to Arabs who had known only the arbitrary gods of grim pagan religions. It swept the Arab world, then made converts — and conquests — far beyond Arabia.

Islam was a militant religion from the start. Mohammed himself conquered the entire Arabian Peninsula in just a few years. The new faith was torn by violent internal divisions even as it continued to spread. But spread it did, with incredible rapidity.

Christians had good reason to fear Islam, which soon conquered Spain and held it for centuries. But because Islam has little attraction for Christians, the West has generally failed to grasp its appeal for others, its profound and permanent hold on the minds of believers. Unlike the Christian West, the Muslim world has never had crises of faith like the Reformation and the Enlightenment.

Islam is a simple religion, easily understood by ordinary people. Its commandments are rigorous but few. When it conquered, its subjugated people often felt more liberated than enslaved, because it often replaced burdensome old bureaucratic governments with relatively undemanding regimes — and low taxes. As long as its authority was respected, Islamic rule was comparatively libertarian. It offered millions relief from their traditional oppression; for example, no Muslim could be a slave.

Belloc distinguishes sharply between Islam and such barbarous conquerors as the Mongol hordes of Genghis Khan. The Mongols were purely destructive; they were known for slaughtering whole cities and making huge pyramids of severed heads.

Such savagery was alien to the Muslims. Where they conquered, daily life usually went on much as before and culture thrived. In many respects the Muslim world was far more civilized than Christian Europe for centuries. The West hated and dreaded Islam, but nobody would have thought of calling it backward.

That contemptuous image came much later, when modern Europe’s science, technology, and — above all — weaponry had eclipsed those of the Arabs. We are apt to forget how recently this development occurred; and, as Belloc warned, it is not irreversible.

Man, especially irreligious man, is apt to equate power and progress. Many of those who say America is “the greatest country on earth” really mean only that America has fantastic military might, capable of annihilating any other country — and some of them, at the moment, are in the mood to do some annihilating.

To the pious Muslim this attitude seems crass and barbaric. He may conclude from it that the decadent West understands only one thing: force. And would he be far wrong?

Belloc admitted that the idea of a new Muslim challenge to the West seemed “fantastic,” but only because the West was “blinded” by “the immediate past.”

Taking a longer view, he saw Islam, though inferior in material power, as having a great advantage: its religious faith was still strong, while the West was losing its religion and consequently its morale. He thought it entirely possible that Islam would catch up technologically, while he doubted that the West would undergo a spiritual revival.

Are we seeing the beginning of the fulfillment of Belloc’s prophecy? If so, the current uproar over Islamic terrorism may turn out to be a mere superficial symptom of a much larger historical drama. The West is still strong, but it is dying. Islam is still weak, but it is growing. Never mind the terrorists; check the birthrate.

###

“Belloc’s Prophecy” by Joe Sobran was published originally by Griffin Internet Syndicate on October 25, 2001. It is one of the 117 essays in the recently-published collection, Subtracting Christianity: Essay on American Culture and Society.

Learn more about Hilaire Belloc at Wikipedia.

I Have in My Hands Absolute Proof the Holocaust is a Hoax

When people move out of the apartment complex where I’m housed they often put out good furniture, electronics, washers, dryers, beds, and so forth next to or in the dumpsters.

Last week I fished a complete set of the 1971 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica out of the dumpster. I had a 1960 edition which was destroyed by my house fire. The books saved from the dumpster are similar in appearance. I’ve posted a picture of what they look like above.

There’s around 24 volumes of dense reading in each book. They’re heavy too. I could only realistically carry a few volumes at a time from the dumpsters up the stairs to my apartment. They probably weigh about five pounds each. Taken together, there must be at least several million words or more in the set.

Volume 11 covers Halicar through Immingham.

There is no entry in this volume for the word “Holocaust.”

Following the brief entry for Holmium, the next entry is for Holography.

Encyclopedias follow alphabetical order. The entry after Holmium should be Holocaust. It’s not there.

Currently, we are told that the Holocaust was the defining event of the 20th century. We are told that we must make it up to the Jews for all eternity, even self-genociding ourselves because of our evil nature.

The Encyclopedia Britannica was the authoritative source for information for the early years of my life, and indeed for many decades, if not centuries. The cover dates the books as going back to 1768. If the Holocaust were a true, recognized historical event there would be an entry for it in the book.

My recollections of high school and college history are that the Holocaust was not taught at all.

It seems that the Holocaust hadn’t been invented yet.

Today, I’m sure that every encyclocpedia has an article for the Holocaust. It’s a big industry. There are monuments and museums.

But somehow between the 1940s and 1971, no one had yet discovered the Holocaust.

The only reasonable conclusion is that the Holocaust is a work of fiction, designed to enrich Jews, protect Israel, and provide cover for the extermination of the evil white race.

If you’re inclined to disbelieve me, grab an old enclopedia when you find one and look up the term “Holocaust.” It won’t be there.

I’m not sure what year the fictional Holocaust narrative was created or who specifically created it. I suspect that it came out of someone’s fervid imagination in the latter part of the 1970s. If I come across another set of encyclopedia books from a later date, I’ll check it for an entry for the Holocaust.