Is Donald Trump a Time Traveler Who Came Back from the Future to Save the Planet from Nuclear War?

DONALD JOHN TRUMP, AKA JOHN MILLER AND JOHN BARRON.

Although this theory may seem like the lunatic fringe, I would not easily dismiss it. In grad school, we were taught the common sense proposition that the best theory about something is the one that best fits the facts. The following theory about Donald John Trump fits the facts.

The only thing I’ll add is that if Trump is a time traveler from the future, it’s likely that some of his harshest critics are also from the future and that they want the nuclear war to happen. Keith Olbermann, Paul Ryan, and a host of others may also be from the future.

The source story was published in October of last year.

The Sun

A WILD conspiracy theory claims that Donald Trump is a time traveller who came to the present to save us from an impending nuclear war.

The brash Republican presidential nominee found himself in hot water this week for his “vile” comments about women, including some about his own daughter.

But perhaps there is more to the tanned tycoon than meets the eye, as conspiracy theorists claim that The Donald is actually a time traveller who is here to save us all from nuclear war.

The theory emerged on a notoriously shady forum called 4chan, where posters claimed that Donald Trump is linked to a time-travelling man named John Titor.

Titor allegedly travelled from the year 2036 to the year 2000 to warn us of an impending war with ISIS, the Star reports

First posting on the 4chan message boards 16 years ago, Titor claimed to be a soldier from 2036, who lived in a world ravaged by war and travelled back in time to change the future.

Titor eventually vanished from the internet, but now the legend has been reignited – as people claim that he is linked to loud-mouthed Donald Trump.

JOHN TRUMP OF MIT.

Legend has it that Donald Trump’s uncle, John Trump, was asked by the government to investigate notes made by “mad scientist” Nikola Tesla.

In his capacity as an MIT professor, uncle Trump studied the secret works of Tesla, the gifted inventor who helped supply electricity to America in the late 1800s.

And conspiracy theorists claim that John Trump stumbled across something very special among Tesla’s lab notes – the designs for a time travel machine.

In interviews Donald Trump regularly brought up his “uncle John”, who was a well-regarded nuclear scientist.

The Donald has also referred to his uncle’s knowledge of nuclear war, predicting that an atomic conflict will break out eventually and bragging about his intricate knowledge of the deadly weapons.

NIKOLA TESLA, INVENTOR.

And another man with an intricate knowledge of nuclear weapons is John Titor, the time traveller who first appeared on online forums with apocalyptic warnings.

Donald John Trump is well known for using his middle name as a fake first name, going by the aliases of John Miller and John Barron.

And some people claim that he has another such identity – as John Titor.

The story goes that Trump used Nikola Tesla’s designs to travel to the future, before returning to warn us of what lies in wait.

When nobody listened, Trump took matters into his own hands and spent decades making money – in order to fund a bid for President and avert the terrifying future himself.

Let me interject that Trump is constantly smeared as a Nazi. If you want to be open minded about it, let’s remember that the famous Nazi Bell was allegedly a time machine used to transport Nazi travelers back and forth in time. There could be a connection to Trump if the Nazi Bell was a Tesla design.

NAZI BELL, RUMORED TO BE A TIME MACHINE.

Last year, Trump hinted at his knowledge of the threats facing America, claiming: “I know more about ISIS than the generals do, believe me.”

Perhaps this is because he’s seen the future, or perhaps it’s just because he’s an egomaniac whose online fans think he is a time-travelling hero.

Only time will tell…

The Earth Trembles as Speculation is Rampant Over Wikileaks Vault 7 Release Tuesday at 9 A.M.

Heavy

After releasing a series of very cryptic #Vault7 messages in early February, WikiLeaks has finally released a file that contains the mysterious Vault 7. The file won’t be readable until tomorrow, when WikiLeaks releases a passphrase at 9 a.m. Eastern. However, WikiLeaks released a new clue about Vault 7, hidden in its tweet. Here’s everything we know about Vault 7 so far, along with theories about what might be waiting for us in the morning.

And by the way, according to a tweet WikiLeaks sent out later, this is the first in a series of releases related to Vault 7:

There’s a Hidden Photo in WikiLeaks’ Tweet

WikiLeaks’ Vault 7 tweet contained a hidden message, because the background isn’t just a black frame. In fact, it’s a photo that has been darkened.

Lighten it a little and you see this:

The photo says “Prefecture” beneath the world “Vault.” Some think it reads Prefecture 333, but it actually reads Prefecture 353. We found the source of the photo. But first, here are the guesses that were wrong:

Some believe that the photo appears to be of Kryptos, a sculpture outside the CIA headquarters in Langley. The sculpture, by James Sanborn, includes four encrypted messages. Since it was dedicated on November 3, 1990, three out of four of the messages have been solved. Here’s a photo of the sculpture below. However, this is not the sculpture in WikiLeaks’ photo.

Others say the photo is actually this sculpture in the D.C. Convention Center.

We found out what it actually is. The photo is “Lingua,” one of two art pieces at the registration area of the Walter E. Washington Convention Center. This is the photo that WikiLeaks used, courtesy of Flickr’s open source library:

As you can see, WikiLeaks did not edit the Prefecture part into the photo. The sculpture already reads “Prefecture 353 A.D.” So no, unlike what some theories have surmised, this is not related to China’s 333 prefecture-level cities.

What happened in 353 AD? There was the Battle of Mons Seleucus, where Emperor Constantius II defeated Magnentius, who committed suicide in Gaul to avoid capture. Constantius then reunified the Roman Empire. Constantius II sent his official, Catena, to Britain to kill opponents supporting Magnentius. Martinus committed suicide after failing to kill Catena.

As far as the Year Zero part of the tweet, some surmised that it could mean that the information is so huge that it could feel like “restarting” part of history once it’s released. However, according to a later tweet by WikiLeaks, it actually means that it’s the first in a series of releases that WikiLeaks plans for Vault 7.

The Heavy article goes on to analyze six prior Wikileaks Tweets that offered clues about Vault 7.

Something big is up. Within a few hours the first batch of Vault 7 documents and/or photos will be released.

Keep your fingers crossed that the Deep State players, including Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, et. al., will go to prison or even be executed as a consequence.

An earlier article on Heavy explains how to download Vault 7 using the zip 7 utility.

LOL! Holocaust Survivor Lived Only Because Nazis Ran Out of Gas

In this 2014 story from the Daily Mail, a poor persecuted Jewish woman who had her 101st birthday celebrates by telling the goyim a nice story.

Daily Mail

A Jewish woman who escaped the gas chambers of Auschwitz is preparing to celebrate her 101st birthday

Klara Markus, 100, from Sighetu Marmaţiei, in Maramureş in northern Romania, survived three Holocaust concentration camps before the Second World War was over.

Mrs Markus, who had been imprisoned in Dachau and Ravensbruck before being sent to Auschwitz, survived the Nazi German camp in occupied Poland because the Nazis ran out of gas.

‘My mother and older sisters were taken directly to Auschwitz. I never saw them again,’ Klara Markus told a Romanian newspaper in 2010.

‘When I asked about them, SS members replied shortly: “Maybe, you should search for them in the smoke or ashes!” and they laughed.’

The mother-of-two remained in Budapest for another two years, before the Nazis ordered the remaining Jews in the city to march toward the concentration camps.

After a month-long march, Mrs Markus arrived at Dachau on October 20, 1944, and one week later she was sent to the notorious women’s’ camp in Ravensbruck, before being transported to Auschwitz.

‘I passed through all the camps on the German territory. The conditions were the same all over the places.

‘I was falling asleep with tears in my eyes, missing my mother, my sisters. I got accustomed with the hunger, but not with the pain in my soul.

‘Everyday we were humiliated, tortured, I was surrounded by death and lot of dirt, especially the one from our perpetrators’ souls,’ she said in the 2010 interview.

Shortly before the evacuation and subsequent liberation of Auschwitz in January 1945, Mrs Markus, then 30 years old and weighing around 70lbs (32kg), was sent to the gas chambers.

She said: ‘I was chosen towards the end of the day with a large group of other women and we were made ready for the gas chamber.

‘But when they put us inside and went to turn the gas on, they found they had run out.

‘One of the guards joked that it was our lucky day because they had already killed so many they didn’t have any gas left for us.’
‘God was watching over me that day.’

Mrs Markus says her narrow escape made her realise that she had nothing to lose and she managed to escape Auschwitz.

Excerpt from a rejoinder at The New Observer Online

The latest Auschwitz “Holocaust survivor” story about a 101-year old woman who “escaped the gas chambers” because the Germans “ran out of gas,” as published by the UK’s Daily Mail is a “colossal lie from beginning to end” and contradicts even the official Holocaust story, a leading holocaust researcher has pointed out.

Writing on his personal blog, Peter Winter, author of the best-selling The Six Million, Fact or Fiction, said that the article, which appeared in the UK’s Daily Mail newspaper, quoting a 101-year-old Jewish “Holocaust Survivor” as having survived being gassed because the Nazis “ran out of gas” is the perfect example of the psychology of mass deceit and lies which has come to typify this sort of “testimony.”

In addition, the unquestioning acceptance of the easily-disproved lies of the “eye-witness” by the Daily Mail shows once again how the mass media is directly complicit in promoting the Six Million Story, he continued.

The rest of the rejoinder provides specifics as to the holes in the old woman’s story.

I guess if you’re a Jew, you’re never too old to claim to be a “Holocaust survivor.”

Jewface Website Exposes Jewish Stereotypes

Jewface is one of a series of websites that includes blackface, arabface, and so forth. The idea is to present information on “stereotypes” of the different ethnic groups.

From the comforting Jewish mother to the nice Jewish girl, the site covers six Jewish stereotypes.

I was hoping that there would be photos of different Jewish types, along with a serious analysis of the specifics of facial and body features, but there’s none of that.

What I did find was a discussion ofJews in film, including Jews in the 1940 German film, The Eternal Jew. It’s embedded in this post so that anyone interested can see the “most antisemitic” film in history.

Excerpt from Jewface

Jewish Stereotypes in Film and TV

Based on European Jewish folklore, The Golem (1920), tells the story of a Jewish rabbi in the 16th-century who creates a giant creature from clay, called the Golem, and using sorcery, brings the creature to life in order to protect the Jews of Prague from persecution.

In The Jazz Singer (1927), Cantor Rabinowitz is upset because his son Jakie (Al Jolson) shows no interest in carrying on the family’s traditions and heritage. For five generations, men in the family have been Cantors in the synagogue, but Jakie is more interested in jazz and ragtime music. One day, they have such a bitter argument that Jakie leaves home for good. After a few years on his own, now calling himself Jack Robin, he enjoys a great deal of success. Jakie comes home in time to sing Kol Nidre at Yom Kippur services and reconciles with his dying father.

The most notorious anti-Semitic film of all time is probably Der ewige Jude (The Eternal Jew, 1939), a German Nazi propaganda film that presents itself as a documentary. The film attempts to prove that Jews have racial personality traits that, according to the Nazis, make the Jew a wandering cultural parasite. The images couldn’t be more heavy-handed — one of the sequences early in the film shows a pack of rats emerging from a sewer and that is juxtaposed with a crowd of Jews in a bustling street. The film ends with Hitler’s notorious speech at the Reichstag on January 30, 1939, where he warned that a future war would lead to the “annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe.”

The truth about the crusades and Islam (Video)

Published on Dec 24, 2016

Faith Goldy of TheRebel.media explains that the Crusades were a response to over 400 years of Muslim aggression.

Check Out This Jewish Scam from a Hundred Years Ago

Jewish Forward

100 years ago
1913

Joseph Hoffman, head of a gang of schnorrers, was sentenced to six months in prison after it was discovered that he taught and organized a group of allegedly crippled panhandlers to beg for money, from which he received a cut, on the streets of New York City. One of his former charges, Joseph Rosenbaum, testified against him in court, claiming that Hoffman taught his “students” to walk with limps and to wear fake bandages. Rosenbaum, whose head was bandaged, was caught by a detective outside an uptown hotel. He initially told the cops that he was a striking painter who had been beaten up by a scab and was trying to get money to feed his family. But when the detective yanked off his bandage, there was no wound to be found. Rosenbaum was arrested and admitted the whole scheme, explaining Hoffman’s “cripple factory” to the police.

Stepping back into history reveals that Jews have long been thought of by Americans in a negative light. The image below was produced by Germany in 1944 for distribution to American soldiers, emphasizing a thought too horrible for many to contemplate: They were fighting for Jewish bankers who would crash the economy after the war, leaving them back in another Great Depression.

THE AMERICAN SOLDIER AFTER WW II, AS PICTURED BY GERMAN PROPAGANDA.

Rethinking Churchill: A Passion for Death, Destruction, and Power

The System lies to us about everything, so why wouldn’t the System glorify that globalist’s globalist, Britain’s version of Hillary Clinton, the Man of the Centuries, Winston Churchill.

If you’re unfamiliar with the criticisms of Churchill, the truth will shock you.

Short excerpt from a long article at Lew Rockwell

To gain any understanding of Churchill, we must go beyond the heroic images propagated for over half a century. The conventional picture of Churchill, especially of his role in World War II, was first of all the work of Churchill himself, through the distorted histories he composed and rushed into print as soon as the war was over.[4] In more recent decades, the Churchill legend has been adopted by an internationalist establishment for which it furnishes the perfect symbol and an inexhaustible vein of high-toned blather. Churchill has become, in Christopher Hitchens’s phrase, a “totem” of the American establishment, not only the scions of the New Deal, but the neo-conservative apparatus as well — politicians like Newt Gingrich and Dan Quayle, corporate “knights” and other denizens of the Reagan and Bush Cabinets, the editors and writers of the Wall Street Journal, and a legion of “conservative” columnists led by William Safire and William Buckley. Churchill was, as Hitchens writes, “the human bridge across which the transition was made” between a noninterventionist and a globalist America.[5] In the next century, it is not impossible that his bulldog likeness will feature in the logo of the New World Order.

But while Winston had no principles, there was one constant in his life: the love of war. It began early. As a child, he had a huge collection of toy soldiers, 1500 of them, and he played with them for many years after most boys turn to other things. They were “all British,” he tells us, and he fought battles with his brother Jack, who “was only allowed to have colored troops; and they were not allowed to have artillery.”[19] He attended Sandhurst, the military academy, instead of the universities, and “from the moment that Churchill left Sandhurst … he did his utmost to get into a fight, wherever a war was going on.”[20] All his life he was most excited — on the evidence, only really excited — by war. He loved war as few modern men ever have[21] — he even “loved the bangs,” as he called them, and he was very brave under fire.

In 1925, Churchill wrote: “The story of the human race is war.”[22] This, however, is untrue; potentially, it is disastrously untrue. Churchill lacked any grasp of the fundamentals of the social philosophy of classical liberalism. In particular, he never understood that, as Ludwig von Mises explained, the true story of the human race is the extension of social cooperation and the division of labor. Peace, not war, is the father of all things.[23] For Churchill, the years without war offered nothing to him but “the bland skies of peace and platitude.” This was a man, as we shall see, who wished for more wars than actually happened.

What Churchill loved was power, and the opportunities power provided to live a life of drama and struggle and endless war.

Yet, in truth, Churchill never cared a great deal about domestic affairs, even welfarism, except as a means of attaining and keeping office. What he loved was power, and the opportunities power provided to live a life of drama and struggle and endless war.

There is a way of looking at Winston Churchill that is very tempting: that he was a deeply flawed creature, who was summoned at a critical moment to do battle with a uniquely appalling evil, and whose very flaws contributed to a glorious victory — in a way, like Merlin, in C.S. Lewis’s great Christian novel, That Hideous Strength.169 Such a judgment would, I believe, be superficial. A candid examination of his career, I suggest, yields a different conclusion: that, when all is said and done, Winston Churchill was a Man of Blood and a politico without principle, whose apotheosis serves to corrupt every standard of honesty and morality in politics and history.