Colored BBC Reporter Grabs White Woman’s Tit During Live Interview, She Slaps Him

BEN BROWN GOT A SLAP A FEW MOMENTS LATER.

A mulatto reporter for the BBC got an unfriendly slap after copping a feel live on the air during an interview. The excuse: It was an accident.

The problem is that muh nigga had no right to touch anyone, least of all attractive white woman. In Texas, she would have pulled out her pistol and shot him.

He should be charged with sexual assault.

metro.co.uk

If you’ve ever wondered what your licence fee money pays for, it’s this: a BBC man grabbing a woman’s boob on live television.

One wag observed, ‘Bet Ben Brown felt a right t*t!’

The incident unfolded during a live broadcast, with the woman (a Corbyn supporter) butting in saying, ‘Absolutely fantastic’.

Brown then pushed her away – with his hand landing accidentally on the woman’s secondary sexual organ.

She then slapped him – before walking off laughing.

On Twitter he said that the boob-grab was ‘completely unintentional’.

Blacked! New Miss USA Sparks Outrage Over Healthcare and Feminism Answers

IN WITH THE NEW. KARA MCCULLOUGH. MISS USA 2017.

OUT WITH THE OLD. DESHAUNA BARBER. MISS USA 2016.

The Miss USA contest on Sunday night was heavy with nonwhites, including several third-world immigrants. Given the looks of these ladies of color, you can’t call it a beauty contest anymore. Political correctness in the form of “inclusion” must be the major criteria for selecting a winner, with physical beauty taking a back seat.

It’s why we should avoid watching this garbage. It’s nothing more than a psy op intended to demoralize us and make us think there’s something wrong with us for rejecting the notion that these coffee colored women are beautiful.

I’m sure each of us knows at least five young white females more attractive than the winners of the Miss USA contest. Young white girls must be feeling low tonight, believing that the ghetto look is the only attractive look.

Soon, for real inclusion, the contests are going to have to include trannies. Let’s push that on the contests in order to more quickly destroy them.

ABC News

The District of Columbia has won back-to-back Miss USA titles.

Kara McCullough, a 25-year-old chemist working for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, was crowned Sunday at the Mandalay Bay Convention Center on the Las Vegas Strip. She will go on to compete on the Miss Universe contest.

The runner-up was Miss New Jersey Chhavi Verg, a student at Rutgers University studying marketing and Spanish. The second runner-up was Miss Minnesota Meridith Gould, who is studying apparel retail merchandising at the University of Minnesota.

Fifty-one women representing each state and the nation’s capital participated in the decades-old competition.

McCullough was born in Naples, Italy, and raised in Virginia Beach, Virginia. She said she wants to inspire children to pursue careers in the fields of science, technology, engineering and mathematics.

Last year, District of Columbia resident Deshauna Barber became the first-ever military member to win Miss USA.

The top five finalists where asked different questions that touched on the pros and cons of social media, women’s rights and issues affecting teenagers. McCullough was asked whether she thinks that affordable health care for all U.S. citizens is a right or a privilege. McCullough said it is a privilege.

“As a government employee, I’m granted health care and I see firsthand that for one to have health care, you need to have jobs.”

Later in the competition, the McCullough, Verg and Gould were asked to explain what they consider feminism to be and whether they consider themselves feminists. Miss District of Columbia said she likes to “transpose” the word feminism to “equalism.”

The beauty pageant this year included five women who immigrated to the U.S. at a young age and now as citizens hoped to represent the nation on a global stage. Verg and the women representing Florida, North Dakota, Hawaii, Connecticut and New Jersey told The Associated Press this week they have faced challenges and opportunities as immigrants.

Verg told The Associated Press days ahead of the competition that she and her parents immigrated from India to the U.S. with only $500 in their pockets when she was 4 years old. Her first winter she did not have a winter coat and the family struggled to adjust.

“I want to show Americans that the definition of what it means to be American is changing,” the 20-year-old said. “It’s not just one face. There are many different people who are Americans, and I feel like Asian-Americans often times are left out of the conversation.”

NJ.com reports that McCullough has been slamed by leftists for her healthcare and feminism answers.

On Twitter, many seemed to be pulling for Miss New Jersey to take the title, especially after McCullough, who majored in chemistry at South Carolina State University and works as a scientist at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, referred to healthcare as a privilege, not a right (she was asked if it was a privilege or a right and why).

When asked if she considers herself a feminist, McCullough said she doesn’t like to use the word.

“I don’t want to call myself a feminist,” she said. “Women, we are just as equal as men, especially in the workplace.”

Tweets criticized Miss USA for both of her answers.

Unless a person sticks exactly to the script, the left will be perpetually offended. Apparently, if you represent the USA, then in their eyes you must be a Marxist/feminist.

Their anti-Americanism is going to make the day of the rope that much bigger and more satisfying when it comes.

Detroit Doctor Charged with Female Genital Mutilation on Girls as Young as Seven

DR. JUWANA NAGARWALA. LOOKS LIKE A MAN.

When you import a third world people to populate your country, you get third world behavior. It won’t be long before Democrats push the idea that charging turd worlders with crimes like this is discrimination. After all, we have to be “inclusive.” Right?

KDRTV

Jumana Nagarwala, a doctor employed by the Henry Ford Health System in Detroit, Mich., was arrested Thursday and charged with the felony crime of female genital mutiliation (FGM) on minor girls between the ages of 6 and 8 years old.

Female genital mutiliation is a practice performed in many Islamic countries but also in some African Christian and Animist groups. There are several forms of FGM: removal of the clitoris (clitoridectomy); removal of the clitoris and the labia minora (excision); sealing the vagina to a narrow opening (infibulation); other harmful procedures such as piercing, incising, and cauterizing of the ganital area.

“According to the [criminal] complaint, despite her oath to care for her patients, Dr. Nagarwala is alleged to have performed horrifying acts of brutality on the most vulnerable victims,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Blanco in an April 12 statement. “The Department of Justice is committed to stopping female genital mutilation in this country, and will use the full power of the law to ensure that no girls suffer such physical and emotional abuse.”

“Female genital mutilation constitutes a particularly brutal form of violence against women and girls. It is also a serious federal felony in the United States,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Daniel Lemisch. “The practice has no place in modern society and those who perform FGM on minors will be held accountable under federal law.”

In the April 12 complaint for an arrest warrant, FBI Special Agent Kevin J. Swanson states that “some members of a particular religious and cultural community (hereafter ‘the Community’) are known to practice FGM on young girls in the Community as part of their religious and cultural practice.”

“[W]hen FGM is performed in the Community, varying amounts of a girl’s clitoris or clitoral hood, or prepuce, are removed by the person who is performing the cutting,” said Swanson. “According to some members of the Community who have spoken out against the practice, the purpose of this cutting is to suppress female sexuality in an attempt to reduce sexual pleasure and promiscuity.”

The FBI and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) recived information that Dr. Nagarwala was performing FGM, in the Eastern District of Michigan, on girls “who were about 7 years old at the time,” said Swanson, “at a medical clinic in Livonia, Michigan (‘Medical Clinic’).”

Dr. Nagarwala is employed by Henry Ford Health System in Detroit, the Detroit News confirmed, and she has been put on administrative leave. A spokesman for Henry Ford Health said the alleged mutilations did not occur in a Henry Ford facility and the health system does not support such practices.

The FBI obtained a court order to review Dr. Nagarwala’s phone records and discovered a series a calls between the doctor’s phone and a phone in Minnesota. The “Minnesota number was associated with a Minnesota family that had a daughter who had just turned 7 years old (Minnesota Victim One, or MN-V-1). The Minnesota family was part of the Community in Minnesota.”

On Feb. 3, 2017, the Minnesota telephone number “contacted a tower in Farmington Hills, Michigan, near multiple hotels,” said Swanson. Farmington Hills has a very active Muslim community and hosted CAIR Michigan’s 15th annual banquet.

Investigation by the FBI subsequently discovered Victim One and a Victim Two, both 7-year-old girls, were staying at the same hotel with their parents in Farmington Hills. Victim One was interviewed by the FBI on April 10 and she said that she was taken to Detroit from Minnsota, along with Victim Two on a “special girls” trip. After arriving at the hotel, she said, they were taken to a doctor — identified as Dr. Nagarwala — for a procedure to “to get the germs out.”

The young girl, Victim One, according to Swanson, “said she took off her pants and underwear and laid on an examining table with her knees near her chest and her legs spread apart. MN-V-1 said that NAGARWALA ‘pinched’ her on the ‘place [where] she goes pee,’ and that she was given a pad to wear in her underwear. MN-V-1 said that she was told not to talk about the procedure.”

The FBI agent quoted in the story won’t name the “cultural” community. Is the doctor (an increasingly meaningless term) a Paki? Ethiopian? Give us all the facts, Mr. FBI man.

United Airlines Ban on Girls in Yoga Pants Draws Feminist Outrage

Yoga pants show camel toe and ass crack. Should companies allow women to wear leggings (tights, yoga pants) to work? Are they considered professional attire?

United Airlines forced three very young girls who were children of employees flying free to cover up. In effect, the company’s position is that the girls were representing United and should follow United workplace rules.

But feminist outrage has risen over the incident. Sexually arousing men and boys seems to be the feminist game, although women claim there’s nothing more comfortable than yoga pants.

MSN

United Airlines barred two women from boarding a flight on Sunday morning and required a child to change into a dress after a gate agent decided the leggings they were wearing were inappropriate. That set off waves of anger on social media, with users criticizing what they called an intrusive, sexist policy, but the airline maintained its support for the gate agent’s decision.

The two women, who were about to board a flight to Minneapolis, were turned away at the gate at Denver International Airport. United doubled down on that position, defending the decision in a series of tweets on Sunday.

The incident was first reported on Twitter by Shannon Watts, a passenger at the airport who was waiting to board a flight to Mexico. In a telephone interview from Mexico on Sunday afternoon, Ms. Watts said she noticed two visibly upset teenage girls leaving the gate next to hers. Both were wearing leggings.

Ms. Watts went over to the neighboring gate and saw a “frantic” family with two young girls, one of whom was also wearing leggings, engaged in a tense exchange with a gate agent who told them, “I don’t make the rules, I just enforce them.”

Ms. Watts said the girl’s mother told her the two teenagers had just been turned away because the gate agent said their pants were not appropriate travel attire. The woman had a dress in her carry-on bag that the child was able to pull on over her pants, and the family boarded the flight.

Ms. Watts judged that the two women who were barred from boarding were in their “young teens” and the girl who changed into a dress was 10 or 11.

Ms. Watts described the situation in a series of tweets before her flight to Mexico took off. By the time she landed her tweets had been shared widely, often accompanied by sharp criticism directed at the airline.

United’s public relations team did not respond to a phone call and an email seeking comment on Sunday, but the company seemed to confirm Ms. Watts’s account in a response to her on Twitter, which did little to mollify the concerns of its critics.

In a series of dozens of tweets, the company said the incident was not simply the result of an overzealous gate agent. Instead, it said United Airlines reserved the right to deny service to anyone its employees deemed to be inappropriately dressed.

“In our Contract of Carriage, Rule 21, we do have the right to refuse transport for passengers who are barefoot or not properly clothed,” the company tweeted.

Furthermore, the company said the young women it turned away on Sunday were “pass travelers” — United employees or their dependents who fly standby “on a space available basis,” it explained. It described the arrangement as a “company benefit.”

“There is a dress code for pass travelers as they are representing UA when they fly,” the company tweeted. It added, “Casual attire is allowed as long as it looks neat and is in good taste for the local environment.”

Few critics appeared to be satisfied by that explanation, which also did little to de-escalate a perilous public relations situation for the company. United was the target of scores of angry and mocking tweets on Sunday, including from social media savvy celebrities like the model Chrissy Teigen and the actor LeVar Burton.

By Sunday afternoon, the company’s Twitter account was engaged in a tense back-and-forth with the Academy Award winning actress Patricia Arquette, who posted dozens of angry tweets about the situation.

Employees running United’s Twitter account spent the day walking a public relations tightrope: explaining to angry social media users why the company was not wrong to bar the young women from boarding, while reassuring potential customers that they would not also be barred if they showed up in leggings.

People like to be comfortable when they fly, Ms. Watts said, and leggings and yoga pants have become pretty standard casual attire for women.

“I’m pretty sure yoga pants are a thing,” Ms. Watts said. “They’re part of modern America. They’re a staple, a go-to clothing item.”

I’ll bet the pedophiles lurking on that flight were very upset with United for making those girls cover up. So, I wonder if some of this feminist outrage can be traced back to pedos.

(((George Soros))) Donates $246 Million to “Day without Women” Protesters

GEORGE SOROS, AGE 86, LOOKS LIKE WARMED OVER DEATH.

So-called women’s rights are today nothing but leftist nonsense intended to divide white women from white men.

George Soros does not have our best interests at heart. Anything he’s for we should be against.

Daily Mail Excerpt:

Billionaire businessman George Soros has reportedly given $246 million to multiple groups behind the Day Without a Woman protest.

Conservative think tank Media Research Center says the liberal hedge-investor gave funding to 100 out of the 544 partners supporting the women’s cause between 2010 and 2014.

Contributions were given to organizations such as Planned Parenthood, Human Rights Watch, the Center for American Progress, with the top recipient being the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) who received $37.3million.

he 86-year-old investor is said to have a net worth of $25.2billion.

The Day Without a Woman strike took place on Wednesday, as part of International Women’s Day, where females were encouraged to wear red and not attend work.

Schools across at least four states were closed so staff members can take part in the protest, according to Fox News.

And there’s the ladies who stayed home.

Georgetown U. Prof Wants to Bring Back SLAVERY: He’s a MUZZIE

PROFESSOR JONATHAN BROWN. BEING ENSLAVED BY A MUSLIM IS GREAT. TRY IT. YOU’LL LIKE IT.

A graduate of Georgetown felt compelled to write a letter asking for the good professor’s termination.

Professor Jonathan AC Brown was born an Epicopalian, but became a Muslim. WTF???!!!

Heat Street title: Georgetown Islamic Studies Professor: Slavery OK, So is Non-Consensual Sex

Heat Street

A professor at Georgetown University is teaching his students that men do not need consent to have sex with women, and that slavery is justifiable under Islamic teachings.

Islamic Studies professor Jonathan Brown recently lectured at the International Institute of Islamic Thought, where he shared his alarming beliefs with students in attendance in his lecture, “Islam and the Problem of Slavery.” Freelance writer Umar Lee expressed his shock over the 90-minute lecture, which included explicit endorsements of rape and slavery.

Brown himself uploaded the lecture to YouTube.

According to Lee, Brown’s lecture was supposed to revolve around slavery in Islam, but the lecturer moved its focus to criticize the United States, United Kingdom and China. Brown described slavery in these non-Muslim societies as brutal, which they were, but lauded the historically inhumane practice in Arab lands and Turkey.

“Indeed, according to Brown, slaves in the Muslim world lived a pretty good life,” wrote Lee. “I thought the Muslim community was done with this dishonest North Korean style of propaganda. Obviously not.”

Brown decried the use of prison labor in the United States and highlighted other problems inherent in Western society, but refused to address the abuse of foreign laborers in the Gulf or the ghastly treatment of prisoners in the Middle East. It was a one-sided lecture that glorified his religion while demonizing Western society.

The Islamic Studies professor said that in Muslim societies, “slavery wasn’t racialized,” unlike the United States. Lee points out that this is untrue, given that in the Arab world, black people are referred to as “abeed,” the Arab word for “slave.”

Brown stated that slaves were “protected by Sharia,” omitting the various atrocities committed by slave-owners. Girls and women were forced into the sex trade and their male counterparts were often castrated.

“In general you don’t find the brutality that you see in American slavery,” said Brown, who described the historically common practice as “investments” and “walking venture properties” for slave-owners.

The soft-pedaling and revisionism of historical atrocities is deplorable, to say the least.

Historically, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams conducted warfare against vassal states of the Ottoman Empire to end the Barbary slave trade, in which North African pirates conducted constant raids into European coastal towns to capture men and women for slavery.

Brown defended slavery, stating, “It’s not immoral for one human to own another human” by comparing it to marriage—a quid pro quo arrangement in which both slave and master benefited from the arrangement.

“I don’t think it’s morally evil to own somebody because we own lots of people all around us and we’re owned by people,” said Brown.

A female attendee asked Brown about the permissibility of sex with slaves, to which the professor stated that “Consent isn’t necessary for lawful sex,” and defined consent as a Western concept that emerged with women’s suffrage and female body autonomy. Brown, he said, believes that marital rape was an invalid concept in Islam.

Had Prof. Brown’s words been spoken by a practicing member of any other religion, they would’ve lost their jobs and shunned out of the academic world.

Traitor Brown’s Wikipedia page offers an interesting look at scholarly Islam, as opposed to the shallow “religion of peace” nonsense that the mainstream media present.

I speculate that Brown converted to Islam to carve out a niche for himself in higher education, where he could more easily defend “oppressed” Muslims against Western tyranny. In short, he’s a lefist taking a sneaky route to mix leftist beliefs with religion.

Stockholm Syndrome: The Video That Donald Trump was Talking About Saturday Night at Rally

Watch, even if you normally don’t watch videos. The future of America is laid out for you unless President Trump succeeds in cutting off alien cultures from entering the USA.

Jewish producer Ami Horowitz took a beating from a Muslim to get this 10 minute film made. Kudos to a conservative Jew for exposing the truth.

From the youtube information box:

Published on Dec 12, 2016

Rape and violence has exploded across Sweden due it’s immigration policies. Watch to see what Sweden has done to itself.

The pushback against this film by the MSM is just starting, now that it’s going viral because of President Trump.

Mediate

CNN’s Don Lemon interviewed Ami Horowitz Monday night about his YouTube documentary Stockholm Syndrome and the unexpected uproar it has caused after President Trump egregiously claimed an incident had occurred “[Friday night] in Sweden” after watching a Tucker Carlson segment featuring the doc.

“Let’s talk about the numbers,” Lemon said in reference to Horowitz’s film’s accusation that there was a sharp increase in violent crimes “over the last few years in Sweden” all of which could be traced back to immigrants. “We looked at the stats from the U.S. State Department. Here’s what we learned: Crime rose about 7% from 2015; much of that was non-violent computer fraud and vandalism. In 2015 violent crime would decrease slightly,” Lemon would claim of the facts he had complied. He would continue: “Where did you get your information and did you get the official numbers?”

Horowitz claims that his stats came from the Swedish Brå, an agency under the Ministry of Justice responsible for the reporting on crime trends in Sweden. He also claimed that he was speaking solely of “heavy crime — murder and sexual assault” in terms of those crimes that have seen a dramatic increase, while Lemon turns his argument to the fact that there doesn’t seem to be “a correlation between immigrants and a spike in crime.” He would go further to say that “there is no huge spike in crime there.”

Lemon would then point out that while crime fluctuated between 2006 and 2015 there was no “spike” to speak of. A tense conversation would then ensue where Lemon tried to explain how averages work, while Horowitz, not understanding, continued to argue that there was a spike in crime from 2006 to 2015.