Richard Spencer Banned from 26 European Countries

If you live in Europe and you had a curiosity about issues revolving around White Identity and White Nationalism, then your goose is cooked.

Your governments have banned Richard Spencer from the European continent. Yes, I suppose that you can still read his writings or watch his youtube videos, at least for now, but there’s nothing like meeting a thinker and picking his brain.

The following news reports are written in the biased, modern style. Spencer is not exactly a “white supremacist,” as the press claims.

Telesurtv.net

One of the most prominent figures in the U.S. white supremacist movement has been banned from entering 26 European countries for the next five years, it has been reported by Polish State News Agency, PAP.

Richard Spencer, head of Virginia-based think tank the National Policy Institute (NPI), is credited as among those responsible for popularizing the term “Alt-Right,” in which racist, anti-immigrant and anti-semitic sentiments converge.

Responding to the ban, which covers the entire Schengen Area, Spencer told Associated Press: “I’m being treated like a criminal by the Polish government. It’s just insane. I haven’t done anything. What are they accusing me of?”

The ban follows comments made last month by Polish Foreign Minister Witold Waszczykowski, who described Spencer as someone “who defames what happened during World War II, defames the Holocaust. He should not appear publicly, and especially not in Poland.”

Poland is no stranger to white supremacists. Earlier this month, it played host to a rally of 60,000 Europeans chanting slogans such as “White Europe” and “We Want God,” the latter in reference to a hymn cited by U.S. President Donald Trump during his visit to Warsaw.

On prominent display throughout was the Falanga symbol: a hand holding a sword, the image dates back to the Polish nationalist movement of the 1930s and remains popular with the right wing of today.

Spencer is a staunch advocate of an Aryan homeland for what he describes as a “dispossessed” white race, and has called for “peaceful ethnic cleansing” in order to halt the “deconstruction” of European culture.

“Our dream is a new society, an ethno-state that would be a gathering point for all Europeans,” he has been quoted as saying. “It would be a new society based on very different ideals than, say, the Declaration of Independence.”

Picking up more details from IBTimes

Besides Poland, the 26 Schengen countries also include France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Sweden.

A source close to the ministry confirmed to the Associated Press that the ban has taken effect.

This is not the first time that Spencer has been banned from the Schengen Zone. In 2014, he was banned from entering the 26 countries for three years after he was arrested in Hungary, where he was planning to host a white nationalist conference.

According to reports, a weekend conference in a farm in Maryland organized by Spencer’s think tank was shut down midway after the owner found he was involved. Following the ‘Unite the Right’ rally in August, both Sofitel Hotel and Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C. refused to host Spencer.

His views have landed him in trouble across the Atlantic in Europe too. A far-right event in Poland in 2015 was cancelled after progressive, anti-racist groups protested to his presence at the gathering.

Earlier this month, Spencer had canceled his plans to travel to Poland for a far-right conference in Warsaw after seeing reports the government was threatening to keep him out of the country.

“It just didn’t feel like it was worth it,” he said.

You may recall that Spencer was un-verified by Twitter last week. He says he may give up Twitter. The more that the establishment fights to silence his very reasonable voice, the more likely it is that violent extremists will become the leaders of a pro-white movement of some kind.

That may be what the Jewish interests have in mind. The existence of a violent, terrorist white identity movement would be easier to kill off than the current movement.

Video: Older White Gentleman Knocks Out Mystery Meat Punk in Saggy Pants

One minute of gentlemanly fisticuffs that ends in a quick knockout.

Published on Nov 16, 2017

Young punk steps up to an old man and get’s knocked out in one punch.

One punch, one knockout. Not overly violent. Mild blood. Viewer discretion advised. Profanity censored.

Neo-Nazi convicted of murdering three friends, shooting another

BRENT LUYSTER. FACING LIFE IN PRISON FOR TRIPLE MURDER.

The murder conviction of Brent Luyster was in the national news Saturday night.

It gave the press the chance to hint that all “white supremecists” sport big swastika tattoos and are ready to kill their best friends.

Luyster is what the mathematicians call a surd–an outlier, a rare exception. He’s a curiosity more than anything. His adoption of white supremacy may not have been the result of rational thinking so much as it allowed him to justify being a thug.

New York Daily News

A Washington white supremacist covered in Nazi tattoos was convicted for murdering his three friends and shooting a fourth person in the face at a Woodhill home last summer.

The Clark County jury on Friday found Brent Luyster guilty on all charges, including three counts of aggravated murder, one count of attempted murder and two counts of unlawful possession of a weapon, the Columbian reported.

Luyster on July 15, 2016, fatally shot his best friend, 36-year-old Zachary David Thomas, his 38-year-old pal Joseph LaMar and LaMar’s partner, Janell Renee Knight, 43. He also shot Thompson’s partner, Breanne Leigh, but she survived the vicious attack.

The 32-year-old was able to identify Luyster as the shooter and offered key testimony for the prosecution.

The 37-year-old killer has denied harming his friends and did so again when he took the stand Tuesday, according to the newspaper.

Luyster — a white supremacist who became known to the Anti-Defamation League after beating up a black man — even held back tears when he recounted the moment he learned his friends were dead.

His defense team argued there was a lack of physical evidence in the case, especially because the murder weapon — believed to be a .45 caliber 1911-style pistol — was never found.

Lyuster’s son was also called to testify, but refused to do so and cursed at the judge before being held in contempt of court.

LaMar’s sister and Thompson’s cousin, Abia Nunn, told KOIN 6 she was anxious heading in to learn the final verdict.

“Hearing those words — guilty on all counts — just felt like someone took a tremendous weight off our shoulders,” she said, adding that she doesn’t think Luyster “should be breathing, but the justice system did their job and they did it well.”

LaMar’s mother, Danette Anderson, couldn’t contain her relief upon learning Luyster would be held accountable for the slayings.

“Praise Jesus!” she called out while deputies lead Luyster from the courtroom.

As he walked out, flanked by officer, Luyster turned around a flashed a grin. He is slated to be sentenced Dec. 4 and is facing life behind bars.

Luyster is an inaccurate reprentation of the modern White Nationalist. I wonder how long he’ll last in prison.

Excerpt from TAKE YOUR CHOICE Separation or Mongrelization By Theodore G. Bilbo

This excerpt is from Chapter 1 of the book. I’ve made no effort to clean up the formatting issues. There are 1,400 words in the excerpt. The book was published in 1947.

archive.org

Although the race problem may seem to lie dormant at times, it continually exists, lives on and
on and som etim es rages w ith all the fury of a jungle beast. It gnaw s at the very vitals of our
existence, in time it w ill sap our strength and destroy the greatness of our American way of life
unless solved properly and permanently. The time has now come when we mustdevote all the
necessary efforts to set our household in order and to find a perm anent solution to this
heretofore unsolved problem .

From the time of slavery through the bloody years of the W ar Between the States and the days
when the S o u th drank from the bitter cup of Reconstruction down to the present tim e, the N egro
problem has been before the American people. It has been, and is today, our greatest domestic
problem. No other issue has been such a source ofconstant friction, has demanded so much
thought and attention, nor has lasted so long. V olum es have been w ritten, great speeches have
been made, sermons have been preached, but the Negro problem has been passed on from
generation to generation. The difficulties have increased with the passing years, the obstacles
have become so great that some students of the question have cried out in weariness and despair
that there is no solution.

W e refuse to accept a defeatist attitude. An answercan and must be found. In the past four or
five years overtwo hundred books have been written by Negroes and white Quis lings pleading
for Negro equality, while only five or six books have been w ritten in behalf of the preservation
of the w hite race and w hite suprem acy. Let those who now plead that this is not the tim e for
discussing the race question obtain any of these two hundred books or any current N egro

DETROIT RACE RIOT, 1943.

Continue reading

An Attempt at Closure on the Contentious Issue of Interracial Romance

That post that I did last week titled Why Females Prefer Immigrant Men has so far given birth to 64 comments. That’s not a record for this site, but it is a lot.

Sometimes our prejudices lead us to focus on the wrong issues or explanations for things. That may be the case in that particular post.

We have some numbers to work with that came out last May. Let’s take a look at them and the context of our degenerate culture here in America.

Denver Post

More and more Americans are marrying people of different races and ethnicities, reaching at least 1 in 6 newlyweds in 2015, the highest proportion in American history, a new study released Thursday showed.

Currently, there are 11 million people — or 1 out of 10 married people — in the United States with a spouse of a different race or ethnicity, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data.

This is a big jump from 50 years ago, when the Supreme Court ruled interracial marriage was legal throughout the United States. That year, only 3 percent of newlyweds were intermarried — which means they had a spouse of a different race or ethnicity. In 2015, 17 percent of newlyweds were intermarried, a number which had held steady from the year before.

“There’s much greater racial tolerance in the United States, with attitudes having changed in a way where it’s much more positive toward interracial marriage,” said Daniel T. Lichter, director of the Institute for the Social Sciences at Cornell University, who studies interracial and interethnic marriages. “But I think that a greater reason is the growing diversity of the population. There are just more demographic opportunities for people to marry someone of another race or ethnicity.”

Asians were most likely to intermarry in 2015, with 29 percent of newlywed Asians married to someone of a different race or ethnicity, followed by Hispanics at 27 percent, blacks at 18 percent and whites at 11 percent.

There also were differences between men and women.

Asian and Hispanic women were the most likely to marry someone of a different race or ethnicity in 2015, while Hispanic and black men were the most likely among men, the data showed. Thirty-six percent of Asian women and 28 percent of Hispanic women intermarried in 2015, while 26 percent of Hispanic men and 24 percent of black men married someone of a different race or ethnicity.

White and black women were the least likely to consider someone of a different race or ethnicity in 2015. Only 10 percent of white women married outside their race or ethnicity, while only 12 percent of black women were involved in intermarriage — half the rate of black men.

White men were the least likely among males to consider intermarriage, with only 12 percent involved in interracial or interethnic marriages.

Despite those numbers, intermarriage is rapidly becoming more popular among blacks and whites. Since 1980, the number of blacks who chose to marry someone of a different race or ethnicity rose from 5 percent to 18 percent. Whites also have become more accepting of intermarriage, with the rates increasing from 4 percent to 11 percent during that same time period.

The first thing to say is that even one white person who marries outside his race is one too many. It’s the white race that created Western civilization and that keeps it alive. Whites should no more breed with other races than dog breeders should allow a champion pit bull to breed with a street cur. I don’t say that with any hate in my heart for street curs any more than I feel any hate when I say that whites shouldn’t breed with other races .

The second thing to note is that white men and white women are the most loyal to their race, even if not loyal enough. White women are slightly more loyal than white men, according to the data.

Someone could just as easily write a piece titled Why Men Prefer Immigrant Women as Why Women Prefer Immigrant Men.

The next thing that I think needs to be considered in all this is that men and women are propagandized by the (((media))) differently.

Men tend to be propagandized to pursue women of other races through porn and through the myth of exotic submissive animal sex.

Anotherbabe is a porn site that is as much propaganda working on the male erotic template as anything I’ve seen recently. Mixed in with a handful of white and black porn models are an enormous number of “mystery meat” brown skinned beauties. Adriana, below, is one of hundreds of examples on that site:

An erection isn’t necessarily rational, but a physical response. It’s unlikely that Ariana and her mystery meat sisters would fail in giving one.

That site will sometimes redirect you to Argentinalove, which sets out glamorous black bodies for the white man to lust after. Catera is one example of many:

I have no doubt that there are many weak white men who would see women such as these and be tempted to go find themselves one. I’m not even bringing up the many, many Asian girls who populate the porn world. White guys seem to prefer the Asian, which is really dangerous if those guys think those women are meek and submissive.

I should mention that I have a separate post on seductive Jewesses that I put up an hour or so ago. Jewish women are described as “bioweapons” on the source site for their ability to attract the white male.

If all of this temptation thrown at white men is hidden away on relatively obscure porn sites, the temptation thrown at white women is out in the open. Black men paired off with white women are everywhere on TV shows, TV commercials, movies, music videos, and so forth.

The miracle is that so many whites do stay loyal to their race when picking a marriage partner.

In the article above, Professor (((Lichter))) notes that there’s more of what he calls demographic opportunities to mate outside your race.

I don’t see how anyone can deny that. Inadvertently, the professor has made a powerful argument for the creation of a white homeland and until then, white enclaves in America. If you’re a guy and you don’t meet Adriana or Catera, above, you won’t be marrying them.

The problem for white men, as I noted crudely on Viking Bitch’s blog several years ago, is that “it’s all pink inside.” I heard that phrase when I gave a ride to a white sailor who was looking for what he called “Nigger pussy” in New Orleans decades ago. Apparently, he viewed sex with a “Nigger” as more satisfying than sex with a white woman.

By the way, I had no idea where a “Nigger whore house” was in New Orleans.

As to white women, they are bombarded with messages from the mainstream that it’s cool to marry a Nog, a Mexican, or a Chinaman. Especially the Nog. Even most of our Christian churches approve nowr

How to push the rate of interracial relationships involving whites back down to near zero is a problem for another post. It’s going to involve propaganda of the sort that AH pushed out. It’s also going to involve a lot more, including immigration policy.

What I hope I’ve accomplished here is bringing out some truth about race mixing and why it happens.

PROPAGANDA. THE PERFECT ARYAN FAMILY.

Twitter Bans and Removes Verified Status of Richard Spencer, Other Defenders of the White Race

First,commenter Wullfe let us know that the Daily Stormer was kicked out of Western Samoa and is now to be found at DailyStormer.hk. I assume that’s a Hong Kong web address.

Now on to Twitter. As far as I know Microchip has given up on Twitter. I haven’t seen him there in around a month, since his last ban. He’s on Gab, but I’ve never had any luck getting an account there. I’ll have to try again.

Baked Alaska was banned from Twitter on Wednesday, while Richard Spencer has had his verification stripped.

BAKED ALASKA, BANNED.

Twitter is going to lose its relevance sooner or later. And most likely Spencer will join Baked Alaska in being banned.

The Daily Beast

Twitter began banning and removing verified check marks, which were previously handed out to public figures to prove their authenticity, from white supremacist accounts as it updated the rules to its verification program on Wednesday.

White supremacists Richard Spencer and Charlottesville “Unite The Right” protest creator Jason Kessler had their verified statuses revoked on Wednesday.

The verified check mark was meant to denote “that an account of public interest is authentic,” the company said in a series of tweets on Wednesday, but that “verification has long been perceived as an endorsement.”

“This perception became worse when we opened up verification for public submissions and verified people who we in no way endorse,” a company spokesperson tweeted.

Users can now lose their blue checkmarks for “inciting or engaging in harassment of others,” “promoting hate and/or violence against, or directly attacking or threatening other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or disease,” supporting people who promote those ideas, and a slew of other reasons.

The changes come exactly one week after a Daily Beast story showed that Kessler, who had called the death of anti-racist protester Heather Heyer in Charlottesville “payback time,” had been verified by Twitter. The company suspended its verification practices the next day.

“We should’ve communicated faster on this [yesterday]: our agents have been following our verification policy correctly, but we realized some time ago the system is broken and needs to be reconsidered,” Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey wrote last week. “And we failed by not doing anything about it. Working now to fix faster.”

Earlier on Wednesday, Tim Gionet, a far right former BuzzFeed employee who went by the username @BakedAlaska, was banned from Twitter. In his last tweets, he pushed his followers to reinstate an account that was banned from Twitter for, he claimed, “saying muslim immigrants are adding to the rape culture.”

When reached for comment on Gionet’s suspension, a company spokesperson pointed The Daily Beast to its “hateful conduct policy,” specifically the section that bans “repeated and/or or non-consensual slurs, epithets, racist and sexist tropes, or other content that degrades someone.”

Far-right agitator Milo Yiannopoulos’ blue checkmark was removed last January before he was kicked off Twitter, stirring outrage among alt-right and far-right communities. Some fans of Yiannopoulos began flocking to alternative platforms, like alt-right Twitter knockoff Gab or the chat service Discord.

In July 2016 Twitter allowed anyone to request verification via an online form, a move that appears to have overwhelmed the review process. Twitter ended up verifying accounts that it “in no way endorse(s),” the company said.

Until now, Twitter has claimed that verification is neutral and simply a way to verify a person’s primary brand handle or identity. However, verified users have long been seen as first-class citizens on the platform. Verified users have access to more robust filters and their tweets and accounts are more likely to be surfaced in search as well as people’s @ mentions.

The latest Tweets and Retweets from the now unverified Spencer:

Bottom line: If you’re verified on Twitter, you’re politically correct.

Buzzfeed: It’s Not Okay for Taylor Swift to be White

Steve Sailer notes that Taylor Swift has been smeared by leftist Buzzfeed News for being herself, which is to say being white.

The Buzzfeed piece, which makes up 99 percent of Sailer’s piece, is Marxist pseudo-intellectualizing at its worst.

Unz.com

From Buzzfeed:

Taylor Swift’s Persona Is Not Built For 2017

In 2017, Swift is still absenting herself from the cultural conversation while simultaneously trying to center herself in it.

Posted on November 10, 2017, at 2:00 p.m.

Alanna Bennett
BuzzFeed News Reporter

Taylor Swift’s reputation is a complicated mess. …

Move over a little from there and you’ll find Swift’s image itself — willowy, blonde, and aggressively white. Perhaps, in an awkward corner close by, are the white supremacist fans who’ve claimed her as a figurehead. In any blank space, you’ll find her political silence and her idiosyncratic ways of communicating with the public. …

… But can Swift’s way of doing things keep up with the mounting pressures of a culture whose priorities have shifted? …

Then, in July 2015, the nominations for Video of the Year for the 2015 MTV Video Music Awards were announced. Swift was nominated, for the music video for “Bad Blood.” Nicki Minaj, who was not nominated for the daring, if not provocative, video for “Anaconda,” tweeted an accusation that the VMAs were more likely to celebrate “other” girls for their accomplishments — “women with very slim bodies.” Swift jumped into the conversation, literally making it about her: “I’ve done nothing but love & Support you,” she wrote on Twitter. “It’s unlike you to pit women against each other. Maybe one of the men took your slot..” Minaj responded with confusion: “Didn’t say a word about u.”

…. As Swift was dealing with all the public drama surrounding her name, other cultural conversations were speeding along. In the US, Swift’s battle with Kardashian faded into the background as the country was swallowed whole by an election that brought conversations about sexism and white supremacy to the forefront of everyday politics.

It’s a bleach stain that’s never really left Swift’s persona.

… But it was too late: Swift had already linked herself to an ever-growing conversation about the damage racism can do — especially when that damage presents itself as white innocence and/or oblivion. It’s a bleach stain that’s never really left Swift’s persona, and one that took on an even more intense tenor after the 2016 election.

… has been drowned out by her lack of public endorsement for any candidate in the 2016 election. Oh, and that persistent perception (or running joke?) that she voted for Donald Trump.

Swift’s relative silence on politics may have worked for the majority of her career so far. But by the time the 1989 era came to a close, a lot of Swift’s standby strategies had already proven themselves outdated. And as a sizable portion of the US entered panic mode politically, the perceived stakes of anyone’s silence seemed to grow exponentially…

… But through the lens of a culture, especially a popular culture that involves progressives actively battling white supremacy, Swift is intrinsically linked to whiteness and privilege. And in 2017, she is still absenting herself from the cultural conversation while simultaneously trying to center herself in it.

It’s okay to be white.

Even if we personally can’t be willowy and blonde, let’s all be aggressively white.

For some white girls in public schools, Taylor may be the only white role model they have, which isn’t sitting well with the (((entertainment industry,))) which would rather there be no white role models.

“WILLOWY, BLONDE, AND AGGRESSIVELY WHITE.”

Like Sailer says, it’s OK to be white. Be aggressively white and do it right.