American Rabbi Calls on God to Destroy Trump Administration as He Did with Sodom and Gomorrah

Am I being “antisemitic” for pointing out the hypocrisy of the Jew in this op-ed that condemns on religious grounds a reasonable conservative economic philosophy.

Despite 30 or 40 percent of our incomes going into wasteful government programs, a Rabbi demands more of our blood.

Excerpt from Jewish Forward by Rabbi Danya Ruttenberg

Trump, Pence, Ryan and the whole GOP are Sodomites.

This doesn’t mean that they engage in sodomy, per se. Rather, the Republican leadership today is guilty of sins so grievous that God found necessary to destroy their (im)moral forebears in the Torah.

The actual text of the Sodom story in Genesis 18 and 19 doesn’t give us much information about why that city (along with Gomorrah) is so terrible that God decides to destroy it with fire and brimstone. God describes their sin as great and exceedingly serious. Indeed, the story includes a vignette in which the residents of the town demand that Lot hand over his male guests to the residents “so that they might know them” — presumably in a sexual way. (This, of course, is the origin of the term “sodomy.”) However, a parallel scene in Judges 19 in which a woman is handed over, raped and murdered — and the perpetrators condemned — makes it clear that whatever is going on here, the problem isn’t necessarily loving, consensual sex between men.

Interestingly, the Jewish tradition — including Biblical sources — doesn’t even believe that the sin of Sodom is sexual assault, or poor hospitality. Rather, as the prophet Ezekiel says, “This was the guilt of your sister Sodom: arrogance! She and her daughters had plenty of bread and untroubled tranquility, yet she did not support the poor and needy.” The crime so heinous that God torched the whole city was that of hoarding resources and leaving the economically vulnerable to suffer without assistance.

One doesn’t have to look hard to see how this accusation applies to an administration whose proposed budget cuts meal and nutrition assistance for impoverished children, seniors, and pregnant and nursing mothers and infants. The parallel becomes even starker in light of the over $20 million the government has already spent on Trump’s golf trips and $500,000 per day on Melania’s choice to stay in New York. The White House is not only withholding support for our country’s most vulnerable, but burning through public money for their own “untroubled tranquility” and devising tax cuts to further enhance the tranquility of the very wealthy.

But the parallels don’t end there. The Talmud (Sanhedrin 109a) paints Sodom in even starker terms, suggesting that their selfishness and greed caused them to impose something akin to immigration and travel bans. In one place, the Talmud conjectures that the people of Sodom said to themselves, “Why should we suffer wayfarers, who come to us only to deplete our wealth. Come, let us abolish the practice of traveling in our land….” I’m sure they would have built that “big, beautiful wall” if they could have.

On that same folio in Sanhedrin (109b), the Talmud posits that the Sodomites developed an elaborate ruse to exploit the poor under false pretenses. “If a poor man happened to come there,” it reads, “every resident gave him a denar [coin], upon which he wrote his name, but no bread was given [that is, the store owners recognized such coins and refused to accept them]. When he died, each came and took back his [denar].” Hmmm, an elaborate ruse constructed to give people the sense that they’re being cared for, but in the end, reflects a staggering lack of empathy for their health and well-being? A system designed to enable the wealthy to get rich off the suffering and death of the poor? I can only imagine that the Speaker of the Sodomite House would have been impressed with Paul Ryan’s tenacity and determination to pass a Trumpcare bill that is, against all odds, even worse for Americans than its previous iteration.

The situation in our country right now is exceedingly dire. We are in a state of moral emergency, as some of the worst crimes Judaism could imagine are becoming public policy — and becoming normalized. Many people will likely die as a result of the policies of this administration, and many more will be plunged into a deep, irreversible level of poverty. Hungry people will not be fed. The bread of massive corporations will be hoarded, and only the most symbolic of tokens — ultimately useless, ultimately irredeemable — will be offered to those desperate for sustenance and care. It’s bad, and it’s going to get worse as the months go on.

“Hungry people will not be fed,” wrote muh Jew. He lies. This whole piece is intended to lay a guilt trip on white people.

Don’t fall for the Jew’s lies. Resist. You’ve already “shared” your wealth with ungrateful parasites. The Jew wants you the host dead.

Jewish socialism is an alien presence in America. It ignores the Constitution. It ignores the rule of law.

Western Kentucky Students Demand Reparations for Blacks While Declaring Standardized Tests “a tool for white supremacy”

WKY HAS ALMOST 10K FEMALE STUDENTS VS 7.5K MALES.

At many universities students are obsessed with football, keg parties, and Greek activities. The Student Government Association is usually populated with students who have an agenda of some kind, striving to make a name for themselves so they can go into politics for real later in life.

The backstory on how a group of students voted to give free tuition to blacks (meaning they would pay for themselves and the blacks since nothing is free) and to abolish standardized tests as racist would be an interesting story to know. Alas, we don’t know that story.

Apparently, a lifetime of indoctrination into antiwhiteness motivated them to make a crazy resolution and pass it. The school’s president, while mouthing all kinds of affirmative action nonsense, isn’t buying the student’s resolution.

Bowling Green Daily News

Western Kentucky University’s Student Government Association passed a resolution Tuesday supporting reparations for African-American students.

The resolution calls on WKU to create a task force to “assess the feasibility of test-optional admissions and geographically-weighted admissions,” citing research showing that using standardized test scores in the college admissions process “restricts the college opportunities for needy students, helping higher education perpetuate inequality.”

The resolution passed with a margin of 19-10, with one person declining to vote.

SGA senators Andrea Ambam and Brian Anderson wrote the resolution. Anderson said he and Ambam talked a lot about overcoming racial inequality as a society in drafting the resolution. He said they were inspired by a similar resolution endorsed by students at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

LOL. ANDREA AMBAM, AUTHOR OF THE RESOLUTION.

WKU President Gary Ransdell responded to the resolution through a statement issued Thursday afternoon.

“Student success is an important ongoing discussion at Western Kentucky University, and the recruitment, persistence and success of underrepresented minority students is a daily focus across this institution,” Ransdell wrote.

WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY SORORITY MEMBERS.

Continue reading

Inspirational Quote of the Day: One by George Orwell

Fake Black Woman Rachel Dolezal’s Trip to Africa Has Not Been a Happy One

A WHITE CHILD RAISED BY INSANE LIBERAL PARENTS …

COSMETICALLY TRANSFORMS HERSELF INTO A NEGRESS …

BUT FAILS TO FIND ACCEPTANCE IN AFRICA.

Rachel Dolezal is now a woman without a race.

As this story relates, blacks refuse to accept her as black. Likewise, whites don’t want her back.

As this story relates, she failed to find acceptance from the African Negro as she traveled to the Dark Continent on a speaking tour.

Excerpt from the Daily Mail

American race-faker Rachel Dolezal has returned to the limelight with her first ever visit to Africa on a lecture tour about race – a move which has been met with outrage, calls for a boycott and a string of scathing memes.

Police flanked Ms Dolezal’s first key note event after a hostile meeting with mostly black students who objected to her insistence that she had ‘an authentic black identity’ despite admitting to being ‘biologically white’.

The 39-year-old, who was labeled an ‘ethnic fraud’ after passing herself off as a black woman for more than a decade, recently took a Nigerian name to make herself sound more authentic.

The shamed black activist, who now calls herself Nkechi Amare Diallo, outraged her young black audience in Johannesburg after equating her claim to being ‘trans-black’ with the trans-gender experience of Caitlyn Jenner.

‘I still identify as black… maybe trans-black is a good compromise because it identifies that I was born to white parents but have an authentic black identity,’ she insisted as students of the University of Johannesburg tutted loudly and shook their heads in disbelief.

The mother of three, who has been forced to make ends meet by braiding hair after failing to get work since she was ‘outed’ as white woman two years ago, was invited to South Africa by a retired black bishop who wholeheartedly supports her extraordinary claims.

Clyde Ramalaine told MailOnline he backed Ms Dolezal’s right to compare herself with transgender Caitlyn Jenner, who won Olympic glory when she was still known as Bruce, and argued there was an unfairness in the way the two had been treated.

Deriding Ms Dolezal’s claim to ‘racial fludity’, she was told by a member of the mostly-black audience of students that , ‘Only a white person could claim blackness and tour the world talking to blacks about blackness.’

Another attendee demanded to know, ‘What are your daily experiences as a black person? Is it wearing braids, what is it?

Ms Dolezal’s arrival in South Africa comes at a time when the country is facing its most serious political and economic crisis since the end of apartheid in 1994.

The country remains deeply divided along racial lines and the arrival of a foreign white woman who claims a right to blackness has prompted shock and anger.

The comments at the Daily Mail are as disapproving as those of the Africans.

How to Play the Political Correctness Game

This process describes how to have a successful career as a professor in higher education. It also describes how the enemy operates. The more we understand, the more effective we can be in fending off the enemy’s attacks.

Professor Peterson seems like an interesting guy we should pay more attention to. Check out his Wikipedia entry.

DR. JORDAN PETERSON.

Peterson is very perceptive in terms of his understanding of the left. This interview reveals some of his thinking. I like it. Highly recommended for deep thinking.

Shock! One Picture Shows What Black Lives Matter Really Wants

Seen at https://twitter.com/polNewsNetwork1 date 9 March 2017.

Conservative Black Historian Shelby Steele Explores End of White Guilt

Since I’ve never felt nor been sympathetic in the least to the notion of white guilt or white privilege, I can’t identify even slightly with the foolish, indoctrinated liberal cuck in the photo above.

His day in the sun is hopefully over. Which leaves a person wondering where the (((cultural Marxists))) will try to take us next.

Civil war? Trump’s impeachement? Fema camps?

Respected black historian Shelby Steele explains how whites have taken the first steps toward rejecting white guilt.

Excerpt from the Wall Street Journal

America, since the ’60s, has lived through what might be called an age of white guilt. We may still be in this age, but the Trump election suggests an exhaustion with the idea of white guilt, and with the drama of culpability, innocence and correctness in which it mires us.

White guilt is not actual guilt. Surely most whites are not assailed in the night by feelings of responsibility for America’s historical mistreatment of minorities. Moreover, all the actual guilt in the world would never be enough to support the hegemonic power that the mere pretense of guilt has exercised in American life for the last half-century.

White guilt is not angst over injustices suffered by others; it is the terror of being stigmatized with America’s old bigotries—racism, sexism, homophobia and xenophobia. To be stigmatized as a fellow traveler with any of these bigotries is to be utterly stripped of moral authority and made into a pariah. The terror of this, of having “no name in the street” as the Bible puts it, pressures whites to act guiltily even when they feel no actual guilt. White guilt is a mock guilt, a pretense of real guilt, a shallow etiquette of empathy, pity and regret.

Perhaps the Obama presidency was the culmination of the age of white guilt, so that this guiltiness has entered its denouement. There are so many public moments now in which liberalism’s old weapon of stigmatization shoots blanks—Elizabeth Warren in the Senate reading a 30-year-old letter by Coretta Scott King, hoping to stop Jeff Sessions’s appointment as attorney general. There it was with deadly predictability: a white liberal stealing moral authority from a black heroine in order to stigmatize a white male as racist. When Ms. Warren was finally told to sit, there was real mortification behind her glaring eyes.

This liberalism evolved within a society shamed by its past. But that shame has weakened now. Our new conservative president rolls his eyes when he is called a racist, and we all—liberal and conservative alike—know that he isn’t one. The jig is up. Bigotry exists, but it is far down on the list of problems that minorities now face. I grew up black in segregated America, where it was hard to find an open door. It’s harder now for young blacks to find a closed one.

This is the reality that made Ms. Warren’s attack on Mr. Sessions so tiresome. And it is what caused so many Democrats at President Trump’s address to Congress to look a little mortified, defiantly proud but dark with doubt. The sight of them was a profound moment in American political history.

Today’s liberalism is an anachronism. It has no understanding, really, of what poverty is and how it has to be overcome. It has no grip whatever on what American exceptionalism is and what it means at home and especially abroad. Instead it remains defined by an America of 1965—an America newly opening itself to its sins, an America of genuine goodwill, yet lacking in self-knowledge.

HISTORIAN SHELBY STEELE.