Vice Apologizes for “boys club” Culture of Sexual Harassment

There’s nothing like bringing in an 83 year old feminist Jew to fix things. No, I don’t mean Ruth Bader-Ginzberg.

The Guardian

The founders of Vice magazine have apologised for allowing a “boys’ club” culture that allowed sexual harassment to flourish.

After it was revealed that the company had made four settlements over allegations of sexual harassment or defamation against Vice staff, its co-founders, Shane Smith and Suroosh Alvi, released a statement acknowledging that the company had taken action over “multiple instances of unacceptable behaviour”.

Continue reading

Vice Asks Jew “Ethicist” If It’s OK to Punch Richard Spencer in the Face

Across the Internet many fuckwits celebrated the violent punch delivered to Richard Spencer’s face–a punch that could have killed him.

But hey, to ignorant libturds who populate America today, Spencer deserved it because he’s a Nazi. Except he really isn’t a Nazi. As Stefan Molyneaux put it, he’s an ethnostate guy.

The debatable question became “Is it OK to punch a Nazi?” By extension, “Is it OK to punch anyone with conservative views?”

One British newspaper, The Independent, said “yes” before taking down that ignorant, short-sighted response by a woman writer.

Most so-called peaceful leftists said yes like the writer. By extension since Donald John Trump is also a Nazi, it’s OK to punch the POTUS. By extension, it’s also OK to punch his family members. Again, by extension, since they’re all Nazi scum, it’s OK to kill them all.

Vice engaged a Jewish “ethnicist” (whatever that is) to answer the question of the day, “Is it OK to punch a Nazi?”


VICE: So—punching Richard Spencer in the face, OK or not OK?

Randy Cohen: No. You don’t get to punch people in the face, even if their ideas are odious. You don’t. We want a civil society, where ideas are met with other ideas. We don’t want a society that encourages thuggish behavior, where if someone has politics different from yours, you get to beat them up. Aside from it just being morally wrong in itself to assault people, there’s the practical consideration that in a society where ideas are met with fists, one is as likely to be the punched as the puncher, and it’s no fun to be punched in the face.

Does violence against a political enemy become justified if they are not only encouraging violence against targeted groups but systematically committing it?

Not for speech. Even though he’s encouraging actions that we find horrible, he’s not our moral teacher, we’re not supposed to imitate his methods. We don’t do that. There is no tipping point there—you don’t respond with violence. You do have the right to defend yourself if physically attacked, but that’s not what this was.

Certainly there must be a tipping point.

There’s a point at which encouraging violence becomes a crime. There are harassment laws and laws against assault. Inciting violence is a crime in many jurisdictions. But, no. The response to that is still not physical violence. The great example here is still Martin Luther King and the civil rights movement of the 60s. It was a nonviolent movement, which was a profoundly moral act. That was a group of people who had the courage to uphold a nonviolent stance even when attacked. They would not fight back, which is so impressive and so powerful, and something that we ought to aspire to.

Why do you think people who are smart and relatively civil in their regular lives taking joy in the punch?

There are no thought crimes. So it’s hard not to feel some glee when a proponent of physical violence against others is himself the victim of the very act he prescribes. I’m not saying you don’t get to feel good when someone punches Richard Spencer in the nose. You would have to be superhuman and a more moral person than I not to feel some happiness that he received just the treatment he was advocating for others. But that doesn’t make it right to do it.

Is it OK to laugh privately at the video? What about share it?

That’s a little iffy, because that’s when it’s on the brink of encouraging such actions. It really is important not to do this, and to not be a violent movement. Violence against unpopular ideas is not permitted. I would not circulate them, but if in the recesses of your heart, you feel a moment of glee at seeing Richard Spencer punched in the nose, I would not criticize you. Not for your feelings, but for your actions if you encouraged other people to punch him.

So what should you do if you see a Nazi then? Certainly there’s value in shaming them.

It’s not just what you’re supposed to do at that moment; it’s what you’re supposed to do before you see the Nazi. It’s organizing for social change, it’s struggling, it’s resisting, it’s being aligned with progressive social movements, it’s being out on the streets marching, it’s writing your local representatives. There are a hundred things you’re supposed to be doing, and what you do if you happen upon some nitwit is a trivial question. You can yell at him; you can verbally confront him. And in a way, that’s good. It’s good to remind people that some ideas are so odious that they have no place in decent society, and that [if you have them], you will be scorned. But you ought not be met with punches.

Cohen mischaracterizes Spencer’s message. He’s also preaching that good old MLK “nonviolence” as representing the highest morality.

Well, guess what? When your ethnic group is being silently set up for extermination, nonviolence may not be the best answer. White people are already too nonviolent in the face of violence from nonwhites. We used to burn down their fucking neighborhoods and lynch them when they attacked us. Now, we file police reports. We’re losing.

Spencer’s message is that whites want a divorce from nonwhites. He sees a peaceful secession as the road to that white ethnostate. Although a Dylann Roof may come along now and then, it’s the left that advocates violence, not the right. That white nonviolent approach may have to change.

Latina Child Rape Victim Says We Need to Be Nice to Pedophiles


Rhea Martinez comes from the Hispanic culture, which is rife with pedophilia. Hispanics are the worst group of child rapists on the planet. Not even blacks can match the sexual attraction of Hispanic males to children (and to animals for that matter). Among Hispanics, Mexicans are the worst.

From the Daily Stormer:

Now compare to their presence in the general population for likelihood of being a child molester as opposed to an average American:

Hispanics +96%
Blacks +59%
Whites -35%
Other -58%

This lines up with anecdotal reports of high rates of sex crimes in areas overrun aliens from Mesoamerica.

The myth lies shattered.

Hispanics are 2.3 X (135%) more likely to molest children than Whites.

Actually, since lots of crimes by Hispanics never get reported to the authorities, the stats significantly understate the predilection among them for child sex partners.

For some reason, a crazy Latina wants to protect pedophiles from the consequences of their actions.


“If he would have had a place to go, maybe it would have never happened to me.”

In the days since VICE published a three-part series on vigilante pedophile hunting in Canada, many have accused us of normalizing pedophilia.

The story about Todd Nickerson, a non-offending pedophile who lives near Savannah, Tennessee, seemed to particularly strike a chord—several people emailed and tweeted at me to express “disgust” that I was offering a platform to Nickerson, who says he has never abused a child despite being attracted to young girls.

On Facebook, many of the thousands of commenters suggested that Nickerson and anyone like him be killed or locked up for life, regardless of whether or not they had actually committed a crime.

But Rhea Martinez, who was raped and repeatedly molested by a male family friend as a child, feels differently. Martinez, 28, told VICE she believes society should be more empathetic towards pedophiles before they offend—and that they should have more options for getting help.

“I feel like if he would have had a place to go, maybe it would have never happened to me,” Martinez said.

Continue reading

Deplorable: Hillary’s Seven Sins vs. Christianity’s Seven Sins

feels bad man

Excerpt from Heartiste


The above is a riff on thecunt’s LGBTQ speech from Friday, in which she labeled Trump’s supporters a “basket of deplorables” (aka normal, sexually dimorphic Americans).

Thecunt, whether she understands it or not, enunciated the tenets of the Left’s new Secularism faith. The Seven Deplorable Sins are a guide to how the typical shitlib measures a person’s worth, because everyone needs a religion, even shitlibs who have discarded Christian Puritanism for “enlightened” atheism. The religious compulsion is an evolved trait in humans; all that differs across generations is how it’s expressed.

Compare and cuntrast with the Seven Deadly Sins of traditional Christianity:


Heartiste goes on to note that the traditional sins were focused on rebellion against God and damage to self. Today’s sins, product of the secular religion of egalitarianism, are sins against the social order dictated by the (((elites.)))

As another Twatterer wryly noted, the vacuity of the Seven Deplorable Sins is revealed when we attempt to identify the inverse of them; in other words, their virtuous opposites.

Racism => Race Equalism
Sexism => “Men and women are the same except for genitals, and not even then”
Anti-Semitism => Ignore ethnic traits and tribal power imbalances
Islamophobia => NAMALT
Xenophobia => Xenophilia (but not in my backyard)
Homophobia => Love Wins
Judgmentalism => You are free to be judged, but not to judge (the one sin to rule them all)

The inverse of each of the Seven Deplorable Sins is the same: blindness. Pattern denial. Willful ignorance.

In contrast, the inverse of each of the traditional Seven Deadly Sins is a list of seven virtues.

The modern religion of Secularism doesn’t proselytize for anything Good. All it preaches is the child-like virtue of Not Bad. It aspires to nothing but avoidance of social opprobrium. The problem with that ethos is the ever-shifting definition of what qualifies as socially unacceptable. The Secularist’s Seven Deplorable Sins are outgrowths of temporal sensibilities and the detritus of verbally dexterous status whores jockeying for power, distinct in nature from the Seven Deadly Sins which resonate precisely because they tap into timeless truths about humanity and fallen man.

We’ve called the modern liberal out for his virtue signaling many times here. In fact, periodically, liberals visit this site and proclaim it racist when we talk about, for example, black on white crime. I usually (but not always) trash those comments rather than give the liberal his platform to spew his willful ignorance.

The problem for us now that we understand the shallow nature of American and world culture defined by virtue signaling, is how to create a healthier culture for ourselves and our posterity.

Most of recognize that expelling many of the members of a certain (((tribe))) would go a long way to achieving the goal of a decent society.

Inspirational Quote of the Day: One by Francis Wayland

francis wayland quote

Learn more about Wikipedia

Heavily Downvoted Poopaganda: How Should The World Deal With Immigration? – The People Speak (Vice Video)

Leftist propaganda at its worst. It didn’t fool anyone. 2,200 downvotes, 700 upvotes. Really transparent what Vice is trying to do, so it fooled only retards, lefties, blacks, and browns.

From the youtube information box:

Published on Sep 30, 2015

VICE News traveled around the world, speaking to people about their thoughts on immigration, and how the world should respond to the movement of people through borders.

Find out what people from Los Angeles, California to Istanbul, Turkey had to say about about immigration.

Many of the viewers of this junk are quite angry at the biased crap being pushed out as journalism.

Diversity Sucks: Whites and Latinos Brawling ON BASEBALL FIELDS Is Caused by White Racist Players

baseball brawl

Baseball on your mind as the World Series is coming up soon? How can you stand all the white racism on the field? It’s terrible. It’s horrible. Who do these white people think they are?

Excerpt from USA Today

A USA TODAY Sports study of 67 bench-clearing incidents in Major League Baseball over the past five seasons found the main antagonists hailed from different ethnic backgrounds in 87% of the cases.

Just more than half of them – 34 – pitted white Americans against foreign-born Latinos. Another four featured white Americans and U.S.-born Latinos.

The figures are startling in a sport where white Americans compose about 60-65% of the population. Based on Opening-day figures, most of the rest is made up of players born outside the U.S. (26.5%) – the vast majority from Latin countries – African Americans (8%) and an undetermined number of Latinos born on U.S. soil.

“I think it’s a culture shock,’’ [San Diego Padres pitcher Bud] Norris said. “This is America’s game. This is America’s pastime, and over the last 10-15 years we’ve seen a very big world influence in this game, which we as a union and as players appreciate. We’re opening this game to everyone that can play. However, if you’re going to come into our country and make our American dollars, you need to respect a game that has been here for over a hundred years, and I think sometimes that can be misconstrued. There are some players that have antics, that have done things over the years that we don’t necessarily agree with.

“I understand you want to say it’s a cultural thing or an upbringing thing. But by the time you get to the big leagues, you better have a pretty good understanding of what this league is and how long it’s been around.’’

Bud Norris has, of course, been forced to apologize for his remarks.

baseball infographic

A clash of cultures is a nice way of saying that diversity doesn’t work. It’s never worked and never will. But of course, even though Latino baseball players play according to their culture while in the USA, it’s the fault of racist American players that brawls happen.

Excerpt from Vice

Major League Baseball can expand into more countries and open the league up to more foreign born players than ever before, and yet still give off the persistent drone of racism because its dominant representation on the field are still white, American-born players. In 2014, 26.3 percent of players on opening day rosters were born outside the U.S. Only 8.3 percent of the American-born players that season were black.

Essentially, you have a predominantly white player base. And these players will tell you that the forced conformity to white American baseball values isn’t racist, it’s simply protecting the sanctity of something bigger than all of us: The Game.

Whites are right. Let Latinos form their own teams and leagues and call it what they want. In contrast to Latinos, Japanese baseball players and teams that come to America, play the game by the rules.

Is that really so hard to do!