Leftist Antifa Expert Draws Dartmouth Faculty Support for Allegedly Advocating Violence Against “Nazis”

DR. MARK BRAY. ALLEGEDLY ENDORSES ANTIFA VIOLENCE.

Die Nazi Scum.

We’re seen the signs at so-called counterprotests held by the Antifa. We’ve also seen them attack people they consider to Nazis, which is anyone who disagrees with them.

Since the Anitfa petition went viral and caught everyone’s attention, I wonder if the faculty who supported the Antifa feel any embarrassment. The press moved from support to condemnation of the Communist/anarchists in a flash when it became expedient to do so. Professors haven’t been coming out against the Antifa that I know of.

Mark Bray should be fired for advocating violence, if that accusation is true. It’s one thing to hold political opinions, but entirely another thing to use the bully pulpit of the classroom and the TV interview to push others to go out and violate the law by attacking people with bike locks and baseball bats.

The New American

On August 21, Dartmouth College president Philip J. Hanlon issued a relatively mild public statement disavowing recent comments by one of the college’s lecturers in support of the violent actions of the anarcho-communist group Antifa. Now, more than 100 Dartmouth faculty members have signed a letter in support of the lecturer, Dr. Mark Bray, and are calling upon Dr. Hanlon to retract his statement.

Dr. Bray is the author of Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook, and since the deadly battle in Charlottseville, Virginia, between Antifa cadres and neo-Nazis on August 12, he has shot to stardom, thanks to friendly interviews with NPR, CNN, NBC, Slate, Vox, Vice, and more.

As we noted in our August 29 article, Liberal Media: Cheerleaders for “Antifa” Communist Thugs, the violent Antifa extremists have been generously showered with sympathetic coverage by much of the media. On August 14, for example, Yahoo! News posted a story titled, “As neo-Nazis grow bolder, the ‘antifa’ has emerged to fight them.” Like many similar reports in the “mainstream” media, the article paid an obligatory nod to objectivity by quoting Antifa critics, but the upshot for many readers will be: “Finally, someone is standing up to the Nazi-KKK bullies!”

The masked, black-clad Antifa radicals scored a big media boost from NBC shortly after Charlottesville when Meet The Press featured a powderpuff interview by Chuck Todd of Mark Bray on August 16. Todd then brought Bray back for another friendly gabfest on August 20. Bray, a longtime militant activist and a visiting lecturer in Gender Studies at Dartmouth College, publicly let it be known that he is a supporter of Antifa. In other words, he is not coming under criticism merely because he is a scholar who has written a book about a subject he has researched. He has not, as far as we know, publicly admitted to taking part in violent and illegal Antifa activities, but he vocally endorses their actions and is viewed by both supporters and opponents as the chief theoretician and “public intellectual” of the militant movement. Bray previously wrote a sympathetic book promoting the Occupy Wall Street movement, which provided the training ground where the Antifa leaders recruited many of their activists, refined their Marxist-Leninist rhetoric, and honed their violent communist tactics.

Media Research Center (MRC) president Brent Bozell condemned the NBC whitewash of Antifa. “Violent leftists have broken into the mainstream and Chuck Todd is guilty of aiding and abetting,” Bozell charged. “It is abhorrent that NBC and Todd believe it acceptable to normalize extremist groups like Antifa which use terror to silence their opposition.”

Bozell continued: “After the initial interview with Bray, Chuck Todd had the opportunity to correct his mistake but instead chose to again allow a radical to promote domestic terrorism with little push back. Can you imagine Chuck Todd inviting a member of a militant right-wing group on his show to rationalize violence against the left? NBC must cease giving legitimacy to supporters of this violent left-wing movement immediately.”

A letter to President Hanlon defending Bray, reportedly signed by more than 100 Dartmouth faculty members, goes a long way to confirming charges (as if more confirmation were necessary) that much of academia has become totally dominated by the far-left. Bray’s Dartmouth comrades see no problem with his support for Antifa’s violent approach to shutting down speech of opponents. Antifa violence, of course, is not only limited to censoring speech, nor is it directed only at genuine fascists and racists. As we have seen repeatedly (and as we will show presently) the black-clad goons broadly apply the “fascist” label and viciously attack anyone who stands in the way of their radical anarchist-communist agenda.

The Dartmouth supporters cite the cornucopia of media attention Bray has received as evidence of his importance as a scholar, and then note that even more media glory is on the way with his upcoming nationwide book tour. “With the appearance last week of his new book on the subject — which has already sold 10,000 copies and been reviewed in the New Yorker–he is embarking on a 30-city book tour,” the faculty letter breathlessly relates. “He is speaking by invitation at campuses like Duke, NYU, and Colby. In short, his historical expertise is in demand around the country and internationally.”

What Does Ben Shapiro Know that We Don’t?

Ben Shapiro is a conservative Jewish author and the editor-in-chief of the Daily Wire news website.

And for that matter, what does Trump’s friend Sean Hannity know that we don’t?

Seth Rich? Hillary Clinton? Obama? Pizzagate? 9/11 truth? Kennedy assassination truth? UFO truth? Charlottesville truth? North Korea?

“Morning Joe” Quits GOP Over Disgust with “Racist” Trump

Did “Morning Cuck” quit the Republican party because Mika made him? Inquiring minds want to know.

Excerpt from Daily Mail

MSNBC host and former GOP Congressman Joe Scarborough is leaving the Republican party because he is disgusted that ‘time and time again it has ‘turned a blind eye to racist Trump’.

Scarborough, 54, made the announcement during an appearance on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert as he was interviewed alongside his Morning Joe co-host and fiancee Mika Brzezinski.

Scarborough, who has come under tremendous criticism by The White House for turning on President Donald, said to rapturous applause from the audience: ‘I am a Republican but I’m not gonna be a Republican anymore.

‘I’m gonna become an Independent.’

When Colbert asked the former congressman what he made of the Republican Party’s seemingly unwavering support for the current president, Scarborough did not mince words.

‘It’s inexplicable,’ he said. ‘This is well before Donald Trump was elected president that my party betrayed their core values.

‘In 2015 Donald Trump supported a Muslim Ban and I said I could never vote for somebody who was going to ban people based on the God they worshiped.

‘Last February when he talked about David Duke and pretended that he didn’t know who he was or what the Ku Klux Klan did, you didn’t have Republicans coming out saying ‘I can never support Donald Trump because he’s racist!’, they’d have a thousand other reasons why, but they always overlooked that.’

Scarborough who served as a Republican in Florida’s 1st District from 1995 to 2001 said that he felt Trump’s message was disturbing throughout the entire campaign.

‘Time and time and time again, they (the Republican party) turned the other way and they’re doing the same thing now. and it’s actually disgusting,’ he said.

Scarborough and Brzezinski, had been friendly toward President Trump during the 2016 election but have been increasingly critical of him since his inauguration.

‘You have to ask yourself how far are the Republican party willing to go. How much of this country and our values are they willing to sell out?’ Scarborough questioned, justifying his decision to make the move to become an Independent.

Yawn.

Nobody cares what “Morning Joke” has to say or what party he belongs to. MSNBC is paying him well for his treason. Under no circumstances has anything much that this failed politician ever done been with the thought of America First.

Project Veritas Exposes CNN’s House Negro Van Jones: “The Russia Thing Is Just A Big Nothing Burger”

VAN JONES.

I believe that all of us here have been calling out the Trump-Russian connection as fake news since the leftist media started pushing it.

How does it feel to be right most of the time, guys?

Speaking for myself, it’s easy to spot bull, which is now spelled CNN, MSNBC, etc.

Zerohedge

Yesterday, after dropping his first undercover CNN bombshell, which starred producer John Bonifield admitting that CNN’s endless ‘Russian meddling’ crusade was “mostly bullshit” directed by the network’s CEO Jeff Zucker with the sole intent of spiking ratings, Project Veritas’ James O’Keefe promised there was more to come. And, all we knew was that the subject of the second video would be “someone we all knew…”

As it turns out, that ‘someone’ is none other than CNN’s Van Jones who inadvertently got caught revealing his true thoughts on CNN’s ‘Russian meddling’ narrative, namely that the whole story is a “big nothing burger.”

PV Reporter: “What do you think is going to happen this week with the whole Russia thing?”

Van Jones: “The Russia Thing Is Just A Big Nothing Burger”

PV Reporter: “Really?”

Van Jones: “Yeah.”

Here is the full Van Jones footage for your viewing pleasure:

Less than four minutes:

Of course, while we’re happy that Van Jones decided to tell the truth, if only while he thought no one was listening, we do wonder how he intends to explain his seemingly conflicted ‘on-air’ versus ‘off-air’ personalities to his children. As you may recall, Jones was the same distraught CNN commentator who spent election night describing Trump as a “bully” and a “bigot” all while saying that his “biggest fear” was how he could explain Trump’s victory to his children…

Perhaps it’s time to think about how you can explain to your children why you exploited your position and fame to provoke mass hysteria among a divided American electorate, over a story you knew to be false…hysteria which very well could have contributed to a mass shooting that nearly claimed the life of Steven Scalise.

Anyone who would credit Van Jones’ opinions as having value is a pretty retarded liberal to begin with. All of these guys are paid well to go on TV and push the “narrative.” Whether it’s true or not.

White House spokesman Sarah Huckabee Sanders urges all Americans to watch the Project Veritas videos.

Megyn Kelly: NBC’s $17.5 Million Mistake

MEGYN KELLY. THE HAIRSTYLE ISN’T FLATTERING.

The largest single group watching daytime TV is black women. That’s no surprise, since a lot of black women are sitting at home on their asses collecting benefits.

According to this report, blacks view Megyn as racist. I guess that’s because a couple of years ago she correctly informed blacks who were demanding black Santa Clauses that Santa is white.

LOL.

Megyn had that one right, but blacks appear to be holding a grudge against her, which is going to cost her viewer eyeballs when she starts her gig on morning TV in the fall.

Excerpt from Variety

It’s still months before Megyn Kelly’s new NBC daytime show is set to premiere, but it already feels like the former Fox News anchor has overstayed her welcome. Only three weeks into her Sunday-night newsmagazine show — a “Dateline” style piece, structured around her interviews with high-profile “gets” — Kelly’s star is dimmer than ever. It’s a far cry from where she was just a year ago.

2016 was a banner year for Kelly: After a wave of flattering media coverage positioned her as one of the few remaining sensible voices within the Republican party, she led round-the-clock election coverage for Fox News — anchoring one of its highest-rated programs, “The Kelly File,” and shoring up the network’s credibility on women’s issues as it reported on, and sometimes sparred with, then-candidate Donald Trump. If Bill O’Reilly was the face of the network, Kelly — a photogenic former lawyer — was the face of the future. It was Kelly’s complaints that finally ended Roger Ailes’ reign of sexual harassment at the network; an indication of changing times, a changing company, and Kelly’s worth to the network.

Then in January, Kelly left Fox News, and since then whatever high-wattage star power she had has waned considerably. This month she’s been hosting “Sunday Night With Megyn Kelly,” an opportunity for theoretically harder-hitting coverage than what she’ll do in the fall when she takes over the network’s 9 a.m. timeslot.

By all measures, her “Sunday Night” effort been a disaster: Her interviews have been either ridiculed or loathed by the rest of the press, and the ratings reflect a distinct lack of interest. To be sure, newsmagazines around one anchor have a high failure rate, even for respected names like Bryant Gumbel, Connie Chung, and Jane Pauley. But Kelly’s problems go beyond ratings. Her June 18 episode, an interview with InfoWars’ Alex Jones, began as a problematic decision and snowballed into a PR nightmare. Kelly couldn’t handle either the interview or its fallout.

Even before all of this, there were plenty of reasons to be skeptical of Kelly’s upcoming foray in the 9 a.m. timeslot. Daytime television is a notoriously difficult nut to crack — dozens of shows, built around former news anchors and other personalities, have failed to succeed, even when they are helmed by otherwise well-liked personalities. Kelly has never emphasized intimacy or likability in her on-camera persona. Her style is legalistic and cool, with a brass-tacks elegance that can, at best, appear regal.

Compare this to Kelly’s fiercest competitor in the 9 a.m. timeslot: Kelly Ripa, a brash, bubbly personality who manages to be both inclusive and distinctive at the same time. Daytime TV is such an intimate and alchemical landscape that audiences’ most beloved anchors take on a kind of mythical quality — Oprah, Ellen, Katie — who are gossiped about and scrutinized as if they were members of a far-flung family. Ripa, a master of the form, was already, in all likelihood, going to eat Kelly for lunch (or is it breakfast?). Now that Kelly’s reputation on the rocks — and that Ripa has a new telegenic cohost in Ryan Seacrest — it’s hard to imagine Kelly making a dent in Ripa’s audience.

On top of all of this there’s the fact that Kelly has a history of cringeworthy statements about black people — and is about to debut in a timeslot that happens to draw a large African-American female audience. According to Nielsen data for the 2015-16 season, African-American women comprised 23.1% of the total TV audience in the (nearly synchronous) 7 a.m.- 3 p.m. time frame, making them the largest component of the daytime viewership base, ahead of white (16.3%), Hispanic (12.6%) and Asian (7.6%) women.

Given all of this, NBC’s logic in hiring Kelly — for an annual salary, according to industry sources, of $17.5 million — was already murky. Now, “Sunday Night” has called into question Kelly’s capacity to do her job appropriately. The entire rigmarole with Alex Jones was a series of unforced errors: Amateur decision-making, lightweight investigation, and vaguely defined motives. She has floundered in interviews on-camera and made to look either dishonest or unprofessional off-camera. And her essential sense of newsworthiness is oddly awry; after all of the hullabaloo defending her interview of Jones, she couldn’t manage to get the segment to coalesce around a news peg. So what is Megyn Kelly good at?

To answer the question, she is good at being obnoxious and aggressive. She’s probably trying too hard to be like Bill O’Reilly.

Americans love to see overly self-confident blowhards fail. If things work out, Kelly is going to come in for a lot of criticism.

But remember this. It’s all theater, designed to distract us from what’s really important. So, have a little fun with Kelly’s fall, but stay fixed on immigration, race, and the economy.

Rachel Maddow Denies Contact with GOP Shooter, but Segment Does Not Air in Rerun

If you like mysteries, here’s one for you.

James Hodgkinson, the GOP Congressional shooter, was a big fan of Rachel Maddow. As we’ve noted in an earlier post, Maddow was one of a dozen or more celebrity pundits who helped radicalize the shooter.

Of course, now everyone is saying that they are against violence, when all they’ve been doing is feeding the leftist nut jobs around the USA the lie that Trump stole the election and that he’s the new Hitler.

To repeat a line that became famous during the Watergate affair, modified to fit: “What did Rachel Maddow know and when did she know it?

Breitbart

Wednesday on MSNBC’s “The Rachel Maddow Show,” host Rachel Maddow reacted to news that James Hodgkinson, the now-deceased alleged shooter in an incident that has resulted in five people hospitalized, including House Majority Whip Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA), was a fan of her program.

Maddow referenced a Hodgkinson letter to the editor that appeared in the July 29, 2012 edition of the Belleview (IL) News-Democrat, but denied having received correspondence Hodgkinson.

“[H]e once submitted a letter to the editor that cited statistics about political donations that he says he heard on this TV show because he said he watched this TV show,” she said. “I should tell you we went through our correspondence today as soon as we got his name, as soon as we got that detail about him. We didn’t find evidence he ever sent anything to this show or tried to contact us at all.”

During the re-air of her program at 12 a.m. ET, the segment did not air. Instead, the opening segment was a replay of a May 26 segment about allegations of President Donald Trump and his associates having ties with the Russian government.

The mystery is why the denial did not air when the show repeated later in the evening. Could it be that in fact there was contact between Maddow or her show and the shooter?

There needs to be a special prosecutor appointed to investigate the links between the mainstream media and Hodgkinson. There’s more smoke here than the is for the ridiculous Trump allegations about ties to Russia.

A special prosecutor should be given the resources to investigate all of Maddow’s shows for the last two years. Ditto the shows featuring Stephen Colbert, John Stewart, and others. The question at hand is whether these pundits dished out fake news that incited the shooter to go on his rampage.

What does the consumption of the type of anti-Trump material pedaled by the likes of Maddow over extended periods of time do to the already warped mind of a leftist?

Journalists who produce fake news, actors who produce fake Shakespeare featuring Trump’s assassination, and comedians who hold up bloody heads should all be investigated and held accountable.

It wouldn’t surprise me in the least that people on Maddow’s show had contact with the shooter, encouraging him in his radical thinking.

Let’s get to the truth for a change.

Sodomite Anderson Cooper Apologizes: “If Trump Took a Dump on His Desk, You Would Defend It”

If you the viewer don’t want to listen to Anderson Cooper’s nonsensical bleating about this and that, then don’t watch.

Cooper appears to be losing his marbles. And it’s Donald Trump that’s made that happen.

Maybe you don’t want to read about him either. As I’m writing these words, a large Amazon video ad is appearing at the top of Hollywood Reporter that says, “I Love Dick.”

I think Amazon just tagged me as a homosexual pervert like Cooper just for reading this story. I wonder if I’m now going to be exposed to having to see ads for homosexual “sex toys” for a while.

Ugh!

Anyway, here’s what led to Anderson Cooper’s speaking a vivid feces image during his newscast tonight.

Hollywood Reporter

The CNN host squared off with his conservative counterpart on Friday evening over Trump’s latest comments on former FBI Director James Comey.

CNN host Anderson Cooper had some choice words for fellow commentator Jeffrey Lord on Friday evening.

Lord, CNN’s resident conservative pundit, joined Cooper on his nightly program to talk about President Donald Trump’s recent “nut job” comments referring to recently terminated FBI Director James Comey. “You can’t defend what the president of the United States just said,” Cooper told Lord.

Lord, however, did defend Trump’s comments, prompting Cooper to respond, “If Trump took a dump on his desk, you would defend it.”

Cooper later walked back his statement to Lord in an apologetic tweet. “I regret the crude sentence I spoke earlier tonight and followed it up by apologizing on air. It was unprofessional. I am genuinely sorry,” he wrote.

The host is no stranger to actions and comments on his show that viewers may mark as “snarky.” While interviewing White House counselor Kellyanne Conway recently, footage of the CNN host rolling his eyes during one of her responses quickly went viral. Conway responded to Cooper’s eye roll, calling it a form of “sexism.”

“Snarky” is typical of queer males. Cooper can’t help himself. He’s spent too much time in gay bars.

Cooper is also not necessarily the best news anchor that CNN could find. He’s part of the liberal cabal that has normalized perversion and degeneracy by making sodomy seem normal. But every once in a while, the mask slips and in the case of Cooper his fixation on feces reveals itself.

ANDERSON COOPER AND BOYFRIEND BENJAMIN MAISANI.