Massachusetts Sheriff: Arrest Leaders Of Sanctuary Cities

A white haired white man speaks truth to power. You bastards are going to be arrested for flouting the law and putting our people at risk.

I hope you sh*ts enjoy prison. That means you Mayor Rahm Emmanuel, Mayor Bill de Blasio, Mayor Eric Garcetti and the rest of you.

CBS Local Boston

WASHINGTON (CBS) – A Massachusetts law enforcement official testifying before Congress on Tuesday called for leaders of sanctuary cities to be arrested.

Bristol County Sheriff Thomas Hodgson told the House Subcommittee on Illegal Immigration that sanctuary cities “have become magnets for illegal aliens, some of which have violent criminal records.”

“If these sanctuary cities are going to harbor and conceal criminal illegal aliens from ICE, which is in direct violation of Title 8 of the U.S. Code, federal arrest warrants should be issued for their elected officials,” Hodgson said. “Our citizens would be safer if we never stopped enforcing immigration law and if we never formed or turned a blind eye toward sanctuary cities.”

He also took aim at a Massachusetts legislator who passed along rumors of a planned ICE raid in Brockton on Tuesday and Wednesday.

Rep. Michelle DuBois, D-Brockton, warned her constituents in a Facebook post “if you are undocumented don’t go out on the street. If there is a knock on the door of your house and you don’t know who it is, don’t open the door.”

FEEL THE LOVE. CAUCASIAN (MIDGET?) MICHELLE DUBOIS SHOWING HER AFFINITY FOR PEOPLE OF COLOR. LOCK HER UP!

Hodgson called her actions “outrageous.”

“This is the most outrageous, outrageous example of what is going on across the United States that is undermining my job and every other law enforcement officer in the United States,” he said.

The outspoken sheriff said there is no bigger threat to public safety than illegal immigration. He said his correctional officers have become de facto ICE agents and are able to perform all immigration-related actions.

Hodgson drew criticism from civil rights groups earlier this year when he joined an ICE screening group to identify inmates who may have entered the country illegally. He also made an offer to President Donald Trump to have inmates help build the proposed Mexican border wall.

On Monday, Attorney General Jeff Sessions said sanctuary cities like Boston must end, and that those cities risk losing federal money. Democrats across the Commonwealth have pushed back and said they stand with sanctuary cities.

The war for the soul of America is heating up. Let the left fire the first shots. Then we lock all of them up.

Texas Mestizo Teen Arrested for Assaulting 6 Year Old Girl and Putting Video on Snapchat

OSCAR ALAMILLO SOLIS.

I can almost guarantee you that this one is an illegal immigrant. The press will never let you in on that, though.

What was it that President Trump said in 2015, which Ann Coulter repeats frequently: Mexico is not sending us her best.

This one is dumber than dumb. Consider how his crime was discovered.

My San Antonio

A 17-year-old Lufkin man was arrested this month for allegedly sexually assaulting a 6-year-old girl and posting footage of the crime on his Snapchat account, according to court documents obtained Monday.

Oscar Alamillo Solis faces a third-degree felony charge of possession of child pornography and a first-degree felony charge of aggravated sexual assault of a child, according to the Angelina County District Attorney’s Office.

The Fairview Police Department looked into the case when a 15-year-old girl contacted them after seeing “disturbing images and videos” on Solis’ Snapchat account.

While the girl was logged in, she found videos and images of what looked like a 4- to 6-year-old girl being sexually assaulted by a man who looked like Solis under his “memories” section. Police later compared the image of the man in the video to Solis’ driver’s license photo, the affidavit said.

Investigators determined the alleged crime occurred on Dec. 20. Snapchat also provided investigators with the suspect’s phone number and confirmed the number belonged to Solis after speaking with his mother and his cross-country coach.

A detective interviewed Solis at Lufkin High School on March 2 where Solis allegedly admitted to sexually assaulting a 6-year-old female family member and also admitted to taking photos and video of the sexual assault. He was arrested and booked into the Angelina County Jail on a $100,000 bond. He posted bond and was released on March 6, the jail said.

Solis allegedly gave the girl who discovered the images his login-in information so that he could prevent the loss of a Snapchat streak he had in a game, according to the arrest affidavit.

A Snapstreak occurs when two users have snapped each other within 24 hours for more than three consecutive days, according to Snapchat.

If convicted, Solis faces five to 99 years in prison for the first-degree felony charge and up to 10 years for the third-degree felony charge.

The young victim may be a relative of Solis. Incest is culturally accepted, even if not legal, in Mexico.

30 Countries Refuse to Take Back Immigrants Convicted of Serious Crimes

CONGRESSMAN HENRY CUELLAR WANTS ANSWERS.

Henry Cuellar is upset that the U.S. has leverage to make countries take back their criminals, but isn’t using that leverage.

Donald Trump should jump all over this.

Excerpt from the Daily Caller

Approximately 30 countries are refusing to accept the deportations of illegal immigrants who have committed serious crimes in the U.S., according to Texas Rep. Henry Cuellar.

While these countries are refusing to accept the deportations of these criminals, the U.S. government is still issuing visas and student visas to citizens of those countries, according to the Texan congressman. There is already a law on the books which allows the U.S. to hold visas from a country that is not taking back its criminals, but according to Cuellar, the U.S. is not enforcing it.

“We’re not enforcing it, which is amazing. So now my intent is to go back to our committee on appropriations and affect their funding until they do that,” Cuellar told Sharyl Attkisson, host of Full Measure, in an interview.

Cuellar, a Democratic member of the House Committee on Appropriations, told Attkisson that the Supreme Court has ruled that illegal immigrants arrested for criminal activity can only be held for a certain period of time before they must be released.

“That means you’re releasing criminals into our streets because those countries refuse to take back those criminal aliens,” said Cuellar. “That’s wrong. And especially I think it’s even worse that this is already on the books, and we’re still issuing business tourist visas and student visas to countries that refuse to take back their criminal aliens. That’s wrong, and we’re hoping to change that.”

Cuellar has not been afraid to break with some of his party leadership on immigration issues in the past. He was known as one of former President Barack Obama’s fiercest critics on illegal immigration. Cuellar teamed up with Texas Republican Sen. John Cornyn in 2014 to help pass a bill that would speed up the deportation of unaccompanied minors. His stance disappointed his fellow Democrats, including Sen. Harry Reid.

There are many foreign countries that refuse to retake illegal immigrants convicted of crimes, according to the congressman, including Vietnam, Cuba and China. Cuellar said that diplomacy plays a factor in the government’s refusal to enforce the law, as the Department of State and other federal agencies do not want to upset foreign partners.

Although Henry is a local area Congressman for San Antonio and South Texas, I’m not familiar with his full record. He seems to be a conservative, which isn’t bad if you stop and think about it.

Just a couple of days ago, this story noted his support for more immigration judges to be sent to South Texas. Without an order from a judge sending them back, illegals are released into the U.S., per a U.S. Supreme Court ruling.

I suppose that many Mexicans in Texas would call Henry a coconut (brown on he outside, white on the inside) or a race traitor.

To me, he’s just being sensible, putting public safety first.

Trump wants to build 30-foot-high wall at Mexican border

Make the Mexicans pay for the wall in gold!

Bring in the Israelis as consultants. I’ve heard that the Jews over there know something about building walls.

You can bet there will be lawsuits and that liberal judges will block construction of the wall, at least temporarily. They’re determined to turn America nonwhite. Impeach them.

Excerpt from AP News

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration wants to build a 30-foot-high border wall that looks good from the north side and is difficult to climb or cut through, according to a pair of contract notices posted to a government website further detailing President Donald Trump’s promise to build a “big, beautiful wall” at the Mexican border.

The notices were made public late Friday by Customs and Border Protection, the Homeland Security Department agency that will oversee the project and eventually patrol and maintain the wall. The proposals are due to the government by March 29.

One of the CBP contract requests calls for a solid concrete wall, while the other asks for proposals for a see-through structure. Both require the wall to sunk at least six feet into the ground and include 25- and 50-foot automated gates for pedestrians and vehicles. The proposed wall must also be built in a such a way that it would take at least an hour to cut through it with a “sledgehammer, car jack, pick axe, chisel, battery operated impact tools, battery operated cutting tools, Oxy/acetylene torch or other similar hand-held tools.”

The government will award a contract based on 30-foot-wide sample walls that are to be built in San Diego.

This is the latest step in the Trump administration plan to build a border wall. Last month CBP put out a call for “concept papers” to design and build prototypes by March 10.

Trump has bragged in recent days that the wall is ahead of schedule, though it’s unclear from the latest contract notices if any firms have submitted wall proposals or if any such submissions have been rejected.

The government has not said where the wall will be built, though the contract notices suggest some pieces of a new wall could replace existing fencing that stretches over about 700 miles of the roughly 2,000-mile border. The current fencing of mixed construction, including 15-foot steel posts set inches apart that are designed to keep people from crossing and shorter posts that are intended to block cars. Border Patrol agents are constantly repairing holes in the structure.

Trump has long promised that Mexico would pay for the wall, which he has said is necessary to stop the flow of immigrants crossing the border illegally and drug smugglers.

This week the president sent a budget proposal to Congress that included a $2.6 billion down payment for the wall. The total cost for the project is unclear, but the Government Accountability Office estimates it would cost about $6.5 million a mile for fence to keep pedestrians from crossing the border and about $1.8 million a mile for a vehicle barrier.

Congressional Republicans have said Trump’s wall would cost between $12 billion and $15 billion and Trump has suggested $12 billion.

An internal report prepared for Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly estimated the cost of building a wall along the entire U.S.-Mexico border at about $21 billion, according to a U.S. government official who is involved in border issues. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the report has not been made public.

Zerohedge

The plan lays out what it would take to seal the border in three phases of construction of fences and walls covering just over 1,250 miles (2,000 km) by the end of 2020.

With 654 miles (1,046 km) of the border already fortified, the new construction would extend almost the length of the entire border.

The report said the first phase would be the smallest, targeting sections covering 26 miles (42 km) near San Diego, California; El Paso, Texas; and in Texas’s Rio Grande Valley.

The second phase of construction proposed in the report would cover 151 miles (242 km) of border in and around the Rio Grande Valley; Laredo, Texas; Tucson, Arizona; El Paso, Texas and Big Bend, Texas. The third phase would cover an unspecified 1,080 miles (1,728 km), essentially sealing off the entire U.S.-Mexico border.

Trump border wall: Texans receiving letters about their land

President Trump moves forward on another campaign promise.

CBS News

Even before President Trump was inaugurated, U.S. citizens who own land along the border reportedly began receiving letters from the Justice Department informing them that the federal government wants their land to build a fence (i.e. the president’s border wall), that it intends to acquire their land and the amount of compensation the government is offering.

Yvette Salinas, a Texan whose ailing mother owns a small parcel of land with her siblings near the Rio Grande was informed by the “Declaration of Taking” letter sent by DOJ that her 1.2 acres was worth $2,900, according to a story in the Texas Observer. She told the Observer that the family’s 16 acres has been in her family for five generations. The government’s letter asks recipients to sign in order to receive compensation, acknowledge that they “do not have an interest” in the case or do not intend to make a claim. It doesn’t really say what landowners should do if, like Salinas, they don’t want to sell their land.

Salinas called the letter “scary” and said “you feel you have to sign.” Her family is consulting a lawyer about its next steps. If other border landowners have the same reluctance to sell as Salinas, the government may have a long battle ahead to secure all the land necessary for the wall, given that the federal government doesn’t own most of it. The nearly 2,000-mile southern border is composed of federal, state, tribal and private lands. There are 632 miles of federal or tribal land — 33 percent — and the other 67 percent, most of which is in Texas, is private or state-owned, according to the Government Accountability Office (GAO). The Washington Post points out that the president would need Congress to pass a bill to acquire the tribal lands for his wall.

Salinas is an obstructionist. She’s a Mexican. She’d rather see Texas land under Mexican government control. Her land is nearly worthless anyway. It’s maybe worth a thousand an acre.

Like many Caucasian families, my family never owned any land because we were dirt poor Southern tenant farmers. Salinas can keep her remaining 15 acres and be thankful that it’s not occupied by illegal Mexican squatters.

In Swipe at Trump, Pope Condemns Populism

THE NOW ICONIC PHOTO OF BERGOGLIO KISSING MUSLIM FEET.

The globalist, Marxist social justice warrior Pope Francis is a friend to all except the world’s white population. The photo above tells you what you need to know about him. The question is why would you listen to him.

Excerpt from Yahoo

Pope Francis warned against the rising tide of populism in an interview with German paper Die Zeit this week, reigniting an ongoing search for subliminal criticism of President Trump in the pope’s words.

“Pope Francis issues veiled warning about Donald Trump,” proclaimed the headline on British news site the Independent about the interview, though Francis had not mentioned Trump.
His statement, however, that “populism is evil and ends badly as the past century showed,” marks at least the second time in recent months that the pope has warned against the dangers of growing populist movements in the U.S. as well as Europe. His latest words echo similar pontifications made during an interview with Spanish-language paper El Pais on the day of Trump’s inauguration.

In that case, Francis cited Nazi Germany as the “most obvious example of populism in the European sense of the word,” pointing to the fact that “Hitler didn’t steal power, his people voted for him” as proof that “in times of crisis we lack judgment.” He further urged people to resist the tendency to “look for a savior who gives us back our identity and [lets] us defend ourselves with walls, barbed-wire, whatever, from other people who may rob us of our identity.”

In his Inauguration Day interview with El Pais, the pope once again refrained from commenting on the new president directly, choosing instead to wait and “see how he acts, what he does” before forming an opinion. But his general warning against politicians who emphasize the need for strong border enforcement and other travel restrictions falls in line with other comments the pope has made about arguably Trumpian policies before and after the brash real estate mogul entered the White House.

In a weekly address at the Vatican early last month, the pope reportedly issued an appeal “to not raise walls but bridges.” Though his comments were relatively generic on their own, Francis went on to insist, “A Christian can never say: ‘I’ll make you pay for that.’” Many interpreted the statement as a veiled critique of Trump’s pledge to not only build a wall along the southern border of the U.S. but also make Mexico pay for it.

In February of last year, the pope offered a more direct assessment of Trump’s core campaign promise following a trip to Cuba and Mexico, which included a noteworthy stop in Juarez, a Mexican city near the U.S. border.

“A person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges, is not Christian,” Francis told reporters when asked about then-candidate Trump.

At the time, Trump fired back at Francis, calling the comments “disgraceful.” In a lengthy statement, Trump said in part, “If and when the Vatican is attacked by ISIS, which as everyone knows is ISIS’s ultimate trophy, I can promise you that the Pope would have only wished and prayed that Donald Trump would have been President because this would not have happened. ISIS would have been eradicated unlike what is happening now with our all talk, no action politicians.”

Both sides soon backed down, insisting that the pope’s initial words had been misinterpreted as an attack on Trump.

Not entirely unlike the president himself, Francis has developed a penchant for expressing his views on Twitter. A number of observers read his recent posts about embracing migrants and foreigners as a subtle rejection of the restrictive immigration policies of both Trump and right-wing parties in Europe.

Apparently, Francis approves of the extinction of the European gene pool.

Univision Anchor Jorge Ramos to Tucker Carlson: “This is our country … not a white country”

JORGE RAMOS. WHITER THAN TUCKER?

The diversionary words spoken by Jorge Ramos in response to Tucker Carlson’s challenge to the Mestizo “Walter Cronkite” of Mexico hides a hidden agenda–the complete takeover by Mexicans of what is today the United States and the extermination of the white race by race mixing whites with Mexicans.

Infowars

TUCKER CARLSON: So at an event several weeks ago in February you said this, and I wanted to ask you about it, and I’m quoting you, “I’m a proud Latino immigrant here in the United States. You know exactly what is going on here in the US. There are many people who do not want us to be here and who want to create a wall in order to separate us. But you know what, this is also our country. Let me repeat this, our country, not theirs, it’s our country.” Who’s the us, and who’s the they? Whose country is it?

JORGE RAMOS: This is our country, it is yours, it is mine and it is ours. The interesting this is with the Trump administration and many people who support Donald Trump they think it is their country, that it is a white country and they are absolutely wrong. This is not a white country, this is not their country, it is ours, and that is precisely what I’m saying. Look in 2044, the white population will become a minority, it will be a minority/majority country, that is precisely what I’m saying. Latinos, Asians, African-Americans, whites, it is our country Tucker.

Let’s break from Infowars and pick up the story at the Daily Mail

Tucker Carlson on Wednesday had a tense exchange with Jorge Ramos on the issues of immigration and race, which culminated with the Fox News host declaring that the Mexican-born Univision anchor was whiter than him.

Ramos, who is a senior anchor at the Spanish-language network, appeared on the program Tucker Carlson Tonight to talk about his stance on President Donald Trump’s immigration policies.

Watch the full interview here:

‘Who is the “us,” and who is the “they?”’ Carlson demanded of his guest.

Speaking from Univision’s Miami studios, Ramos explained that there are people in the country who want to go back to 1965, when there was a white majority, and who believe that Latinos, immigrants and refugees have no place here.

‘This is not a white country. This is not their country. It is ours,’ Ramos said before adding, ‘this is a multiracial country and we must be tolerant.’

Carlson then snapped at Ramos: ‘Let me just point out that you are white, obviously. You’re whiter than I am: you have blue eyes, so I don’t know exactly what you mean by “white” or “Latino.”‘

Ramos, a journalist and author widely regarded as the ‘Walter Cronkite of Latin America,’ was born in Mexico City in 1958 and came to the US in 1983 on a student visa.

Ramos proves again the maxim that when nonwhites are hugely outnumbered they behave. Once they reach critical mass, they start raising a stink and their true feelings about their generous white hosts come out.

If Ramos wants a race war, and he does, he better be careful. Whites have 15 IQ points on Mexicans and we still outnumber them.

The rallying cry, “Remember the Alamo” seems appropriate when dealing with Mexican Supremacists like Ramos.