Inspector General Says U.S. Army Mistreated Retired War Dogs

The corrupt American military pays more attention to its beloved trannies than it does to its heroic war dogs.

America’s slide into a third world sh*thole is happening one small step at a time.

White people don’t allow things like this to happen, although there’s little doubt that a white male will be scapegoated for the shameful treatment of our canine friends.

The Hill

A Defense Department inspector general report published Thursday found that the U.S. Army mistreated bomb-sniffing dogs after they were discharged from the military, Reuters reported.

Continue reading

Big Fat-Assed Droopy Breasted Latina Breastfeeding in Disneyland Draws Ire of Some Patrons


This fat f*ck pays $1,049 for a season pass to Disneyland. I guess that entitles her to show off her tatted droopers to one and all.

Go back to Mexico, fattie.

New York Daily News

Brittni Medina has some choice words those offended by her breastfeeding publicly.

The mother of two, a frequent visitor at Disneyland, shared a viral Facebook post after a November trip to the California theme park during which she claims she was shamed for publicly breastfeeding her 10 month old.

“I was standing in a very long line to get our picture taken my son got hungry and I wasn’t going to wait in another line again. So I took off my first top and nursed,” she wrote in the post, shared to a group called Breastfeeding Mama Talk.

“These women were making snarky comments so I moved from my spot to catch a picture with these characters. Not for attention for me but attention to the fact NO WOMEN SHOULD BE SHAMED FOR FEEDING THEIR BABY UNCOVERED.”

Under California law, women are permitted to breastfeed their children with or without a cover in public and private.

Medina’s post drew thousands of comments.

While many group members supported her, others argued that she should have been more discreet while visiting Disneyland.

Medina responded, taking the time to explain why she felt there was nothing wrong with breastfeeding her son in full view of other park visitors.

“Yes not everyone agrees. For one I don’t need your approval! Disney policy and the law fully support me,” she wrote.

“Boobs are not sexual! If you can’t inform your kids a baby is eating that’s not my issue. Am I normally this exposed when I feed my son? No! But not all moments as a mother are glamorous! In this moment he is a big boy and is pulling on my nursing shirt!”

Boobs are not sexual? LMFAO!

California law allows public breastfeeding as an accommodation to the teaming hordes of brown filth washing up from Mexico who have taken over that ridiculous state.

Medina is another example of the arrogant Mexican who sh*ts all over American norms. Wanna bet how much she collects in welfare every year???!!!


Partial List of Bans Against Truth: Andrew Anglin Asks Which Side are YOU On?

Microchip has been banned from Twitter over a hundred times but continues to sneak back on. I believe some readers here told me that Ambrose Kane has been shut down. Stormfront has been shut down.

Any others you know about?

List linked in this Daily Stormer article.

What we want is a return to normalcy, a return to sanity.

That is all.

We do not want Jews running our nation, we do not want to be overrun by Third Worlders, and we do not want our race and civilization destroyed – just as no sane person did prior to about the 1950s.

The people who are now censoring us do want those things.

They are part of a system that is hellbent on destroying us.

Charlottesville made it clear for everyone that that is what this current system wants, and will stop at nothing to get.

We are in a war, and the stakes have never been higher.

This is a war for our very genetic survival.

Expecting our enemies – who want America turned into a third world hellhole – to respect our freedom of speech, would be pretty naive.

Of course they want us silenced.

But: are we going to allow them to get away with it?

Are we – the good, decent, law-abiding Americans – going to stand by silently as they ban everyone who doesn’t agree with their insane liberal ideology from the internet, one by one?

That is what is going to happen if we don’t fight this tooth and nail.

Rights are not “inherent.” Arguably, they don’t exist at all. What do exist are privileges, and these flow from power. At best there are privileges that are viewed as sacred enough by enough of a people or a nation that they are respected without having to be demanded – or denied – at the barrel of a gun.

But these privileges/rights are eternally in peril.

The Founders were well aware of this, and that is why they made the Second Amendment the right to bear arms.

That will no doubt be viewed as a radical statement, but it is not a call for violent revolution, it is simply stating a historical fact.

We’re not going to overthrow the government, at least not any time soon (although doing so at this point would indeed be in keeping with the warnings and directives of the Founding Fathers), but what we can do is make a lot of noise.

We need to turn the screws as tight as we can. Pressure works, and we need all hands on deck to apply it in mighty doses.

The only reason, effectively, that any politically active individual would not stand up against this insane wave of censorship, this assault on the most basic of all of our freedoms, would be because they, too, are in the enemy camp, and wish our destruction.

Make your choice.

We aren’t going to get a second chance. The future of civilization rests on our willingness to fight against this tyranny.

Ultimately, people will either die knowing they stood up for what is right in this hour of darkness, or they will die knowing that they stayed silent because they were afraid.

Those who choose the latter are betraying America and her heroic Founders, who themselves risked life and limb to win us these precious freedoms that are now under assault.

Which side are you on?

Latina Judge Arrested, Handcuffed, Led from Court


This story isn’t just about an arrogant third world mind residing in the body of a judge. It’s also about a fuxated legal system that seemingly cannot bring the Latino bitch at its center under control.

Although Leticia is not allowed to sit on the bench and judge people (the horrors of being in her damn court), she continues to be paid her $173,000 a year salary.

USA Today

ROCHESTER, N.Y. — An embattled City Court judge was escorted Monday from judicial chambers in handcuffs.

Rochester court deputies and city police officers executed a bench warrant issued for Judge Leticia Astacio’s arrest last week after she missed a Tuesday court appearance related to an August drunken-driving conviction.

Astacio, a Rochester City Court judge, smiled and said hello to the gaggle of reporters waiting for her at the fifth floor elevator bank of the Monroe County Hall of Justice where officers marched her off to be processed at the nearby Rochester Public Safety Building. She returned later to the courthouse for an arraignment before Judge Stephen Aronson of Canandaigua City Court, who issued the warrant and is overseeing her drunken-driving case.

He ordered her held without bail in Monroe County Jail until a Thursday hearing. The reason she missed her court appearance last week was because she had been living in a temple with monks in the mountains of Thailand since May 3, she had texted to her lawyer.


Continue reading

White Man and Wife Make the Mistake of Eating at a 70 Percent Black Golden Corral

There are usually some pretty good race realists posting messages on the GLP Forum.

On Sunday night, a member posted his experience eating at Golden Corral. That brought forth a torrent of interesting comments.

I believe that Golden Corral offers to some degree a buffet dining experience.

Here’s the original post, with a few of the follow ups.

Had lunch at Golden Corral today and the food tasted like crap.

My wife and I had lunch at Golden Corral today and the food was so horrible that I wanted to throw up. What a fucking waste of $30(for both) on a lunch buffet. The grilled chicken tasted like they took the meat out of the chicken’s ass and burned it in the coal. All the fried food tasted like crap. The desert was fine but not up to the mark.

I told my wife that we will never go to the Golden Corral again. The crowd was like 70% black 30% white.

Did you see all the people leaving the bathroom (hands unwashed) pawing at the food?

Oh you missed that ehh?

You stomach didn’t.


careful if you see muslims at a buffet,

they don’t use toilet paper.

I ate there about a year ago and almost died! I was rushed to hospital throwing up blood. Here in west texas, the population here who work at fast food have absolutely no regard for food safety. they could care less, what matters is replying to a text message during work hours…

Golden Corral used to not be so bad. I remember going there as a child with my family after church most Sundays.

I went to a local one a few years ago… terrible. There was food all over the floor, and someone had apparently barfed. It was there from the time we walked in to about thirty minutes later when staff finally started cleaning it up. I will never visit there again.

Another place that has been a constant disappointment is Chili’s. I used to like their burgers, but I won’t go any more. It consistently takes about ten minutes to get our drinks, and sometimes forty-five minutes to get our food *after* we order… and it’s about 50/50 as to whether the order will be totally screwed up (I’m not picky, by the way). There’s always barf in the parking lot (from drunken patrons, I assume). Disgusting. They had their last chance. I’m never going back.

Oh lord.
We went there Friday night.
I should have known it was going to be bad when we were walking up to the door and a woman was so fat that her family was having to push her on one side and pull her on the other side to get her out of her car so she could waddle in. I wish I was kidding.

Then when we sat down a hairy-ape man (like the most hair on a human I have ever seen) was wearing a wife beater lime green t-shirt on a 350 pound frame with huge sweaty armpits, he kept passing our table and I had a full view of him. I could barely eat.

Then a humongous woman with a clown-red weave sat down away from me and her bottom was hanging over the side of the chair to where she actually needed two or maybe three chairs.

With that view I went on a diet.

The food was just okay. The soup was the worst I have ever tasted. I thought it was the old clam chowder but it just tasted like fat off of meat or something not edible.

The food is just okay. I won’t go back. The people who eat there are seriously scraping the bottom of the human race.

The white youth who exposed Golden Corral in this video was subsequently fired.

I personally have no opinion on the restaurant as I’ve never eaten there. I’ve seen mixed reviews on Yelp.

Feds: Up to 100 Girls May Have Had Their Genitals Cut in Michigan

(((Judge Bernard Friedman))) has allowed two of three defendants in the Michigan female genital mutilation case released from jail on bail.

That third world primitives like the defendants in the case are even in the United States is proof that the country’s policy of “inclusion” and essentially open borders is a disaster.

Excerpt from Freep

A federal prosecutor dropped a bombshell in court Wednesday, telling a federal judge that the government estimates that as many as 100 girls may have had their genitals cut at the hands of a local doctor and her cohorts.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Sara Woodward disclosed the information while trying to convince a judge to keep a doctor and his wife locked up in the historic case. It involves allegations that two Minnesota girls had their genitals cut at a Livonia clinic in February as part of a religious rite of passage and were told to keep what happened a secret.

“Due to the secretive nature of this procedure, we are unlikely to ever know how many children were cut by Dr. (Jumana) Nagarwala,” Woodward said, referring to the lead defendant in the case, later adding, “The Minnesota victims were not the first victims.”

Against Woodward’s wishes, U.S. District Judge Bernard Friedman granted bond to two other defendants in the case: Dr. Fakhruddin Attar, 53, of Farmington Hills, who is accused of letting Nagarwala use his clinic to perform genital cutting procedures on minor girls; and his wife, Farida Attar, 50, who is accused of holding the girls’ hands during the procedure to keep them from squirming and to calm them.

The government believes the three defendants, all members of a local Indian-Muslim sect, subjected numerous girls to genital cutting procedures over a 12-year period. To date, the government says it has identified eight victims — including the two Minnesota girls — though Woodward said the government estimates there could be as many as 100 victims. She said that’s a conservative estimate, and that it’s based on Dr. Attar’s alleged admission to authorities that he let Nagarwala use his clinic up to six times a year to treat children for genital rashes.

Attar’s lawyer, Mary Chartier, scoffed at the claim.

“I think the government has overstated so many aspects of this case and this is one more example of overreaching,” Chartier said after the hearing, during which she and another lawyer convinced the judge to set the Attars free.

The defense has argued that the Attars did not engage in any criminal act and that the procedure at issue is a protected religious rite-of-passage that involves no cutting, but rather a scraping of genital membrane. They also argued the Attars are not a danger to the society and have no reason or desire to flee, convincing U.S. District Judge Bernard Friedman to release them on bond.

American Muslims Claim Genital Mutilation a Religious Right in Landmark Case

Barbaric practices not seen in the West for hundreds of years are reappearing because those who are in charge claim to know what’s best for us and they say that multiculturalism will make us better human beings.

Oh yeah, bringing in dumb, violent savages and then increasing the government budget to support them for life is so “culturally enriching.”

Excerpt from Freep

Lawyers plan to claim genital cutting is allowed as a religious right. But legal experts say the First Amendment doesn’t bend that far.

On paper, the law seems clear: Cutting any part of a young girl’s genitalia is illegal — and no custom or ritual can be used to justify it.

The law has been on the books for 21 years, unchallenged.

But in a federal courtroom in Detroit, a landmark case involving the centuries-old taboo ritual is about to put that law to the test for the first time.

And perhaps more historic, a question will be raised in the American legal system that has never been raised before: Does the U.S. Constitution allow for genital cutting, even if it’s just a minor nick or scraping, in the name of religion?

Defense lawyers plan to argue that religious freedom is at the core of the case in which two physicians and one of their wives are charged with subjecting young girls to genital cutting. All three are members of the Dawoodi Bohra, a small Indian-Muslim sect that has a mosque in Farmington Hills.

The defense maintains that the doctors weren’t engaged in any actual cutting — just a scraping of the genitalia — and that the three defendants are being persecuted for practicing their religion by a culture and society that doesn’t understand their beliefs and is misinterpreting what they did.

First Amendment scholars across the country — liberal and conservative alike — are closely following the case, noting that the fate of the accused will largely rest with scientific evidence.

The key question for jurors to answer will be: Were children harmed physically? If they were, experts say, the religious freedom defense doesn’t stand a chance.

But if the defense can show that it was just a nick and caused no harm, some experts believe, the defendants could be acquitted on religious grounds.

‘This is new territory’

The Detroit case involves the genital cuttings of two 7-year-old Minnesota girls whose mothers brought them to a Livonia clinic for the procedure in February.

Defense lawyers have argued that the defendants are good, hardworking people with deeply held religious convictions who were involved in only mild procedures that are part of their faith.

But the government says the harm was much more severe than the defense is claiming and that there are multiple other victims. According to court documents, the two Minnesota girls had scarring and abnormalities on their clitorises and labia minora.

“It is hard for me to imagine any court accepting the religious freedom defense given the harm that’s being dealt in this case,” said First Amendment expert Erwin Chemerinsky, one of the nation’s leading constitutional law scholars who called the religious claim in the Detroit case a “losing argument.”

“You don’t have the right to impose harm on others in practicing your religion,” said Chemerinsky, dean of the law school at the University of California at Irvine who in January was named the country’s most influential person in legal education by National Jurist magazine.

Chemerinsky, who has written a leading textbook on constitutional law, said there is “no absolute right” to religion in the U.S., noting many parents over the years have fought for the right to refuse their children medical care because of religious beliefs. But those parents, many of them Jehovah’s Witnesses or Christian Scientists, have consistently lost those cases, he said.

Jehovah’s Witnesses and Christian Scientists are white Americans. As we’ve seen too often, brown turds have special privileges in America, granted by liberal judges. I hope I’m wrong, but it’s a real possibility that the Muzzies will win this one.