David Duke, MILO, Others Lash Out at “stupid” Ariana Grande

Race matters. As Ariana Grande is nonwhite, as shown in yesterday’s post about the Illuminati princess, I wouldn’t expect her to make any statement against open borders or against brown or black immigrants flooding the West.

Both MILO and David Duke took the opportunity to get some attention to the issue of immigration by taking a swing at the demonic, Kabbalah worshiping pop idol.

SFgate

Singer Ariana Grande, whose Monday night concert in Manchester, U.K. was targeted by terrorists, is now the subject of judgment by right wing and racist trolls on social media. The outspoken and predominantly conservative social media critics include such controversial figures as former Breitbart editor Milo Yiannopoulos and former Ku Klux Klan Imperial Wizard David Duke.

Yiannopoulos, who is permanently banned from Twitter, posted a string of messages on his Facebook page. “Sadly, Ariana Grande is too stupid to wise up and warn her European fans about the real threats to their freedom and their lives,” he wrote on Tuesday, just one day after the attack. “She will remain ferociously pro-immigrant, pro-Islam and anti-America. Makes you wonder whether they bombed to attack her or in solidarity.”

On Wednesday, he added that the fact that she hasn’t explicitly condemned the bombing less than 48 hours later is a “supreme act of cowardice.”

n their attacks against the pop star, some critics are invoking a 2015 incident wherein Grande made what many believe to be an anti-American and unpatriotic statement. She also, strangely, licked doughnuts on display at a bakery she was visiting. She apologized for saying “I hate America” and the doughnut licking, saying she was “sorry for not using more discretion with my choice of words.”

Grande hasn’t yet addressed Monday’s attack publicly, save for a tweet immediately after saying that she feels “broken” and is “so so sorry.” There is also an unconfirmed report that she has offered to pay for the funerals of the night’s 22 victims.

Besides Yiannopoulos, some far-right personalities and white supremacists criticizing Grande include David Duke, who suggested she put her fans at risk by supporting LGBT rights, among other things, and Wayne Allyn Root, a Libertarian who ran for president in 2008, who tweeted that “perhaps (Monday’s attack) changed liberal ignorance of Grande.” Lauren Cooley, a conservative personality, also wrote to her 48,000 Twitter followers that Grande “is a spoiled brat” for not visiting injured fans at the hospital because it’s “not like she was in the blast zone.”

Many on Twitter, however, are aggressively defending Grande, pointing out the pop star is likely traumatized and still processing the events, since it has been less than 48 hours since the bombing occurred.

Trump-Hating Diversity Champion Katy Perry Prefers Dead Fans to Borders

Pop singing sensation Katy Perry, another Illuminati creation, took advantage of the press coverage of the Manchester bombing to interject herself into the story. Her take? “No barriers. No borders. We all just need to co-exist.”

You probably saw my post yesterday featuring another Katie–Katie Hopkins. Katie Hopkins is based. Katy Perry is a tool of the (((entertainment industry))).

Breitbart

Pop megastar Katy Perry made an impassioned plea for people to “co-exist” and said that “barriers” or “borders” could detract from that goal in an interview following the terrorist bombing at an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester, U.K. on Monday night that claimed the lives of at least 22 people and injured dozens of others.

In an interview Tuesday on Elvis Duran and the Morning Show, the “Chained to the Rhythm” singer suggested that people “unite” following the tragedy, which occurred as young fans and their parents were leaving the 21,000-seat arena at around 10:35 p.m. local time.


Perry’s preference for no “borders” or “barriers” may come from her staunch opposition to President Donald Trump, who promised during the 2016 campaign to build a security wall on the U.S.-Mexico border. The singer was a vocal supporter of former Democratic presidential contender Hillary Clinton, and previously marched in the anti-Trump Women’s March on Washington shortly after Trump’s inauguration.

The 32-year-old star has subsequently entered a new era of “purposeful” pop music and established herself as a vocal member of the anti-Trump “Resistance” movement.

Highly upvoted based comments at Breitbart:

man… i hate to be disparaging …. but what a stupid thing to say!!!! Men…conspired to murder little girls…. GIRLS!!! Your fans and you blather about borders and walls?
how f, kin stupid are you???

She is willing to sacrifice their lives to satiate her need to feel compassionate. People like her believe 2+2=5.

It’s OK those little girls died for diversity and a bigger liberal voting base.

Don’t be a bigot! “Diversity is our strength.”

We can live in peace with people who murder our children with nail bombs.

After these little girls were slaughtered Katy just wants everyone to remember that the priority is open borders and no walls.

Liberals never give a $#!T about the victims of their policies. Their ideology comes first, next the muslims, then the lives of those innocent little girls.

No borders, no barriers, no protection from the rapes in Sweden and Germany, no protection from the trucks mowing down people in France and Germany, no protection from flying nails at the Ariana Grande concert for young innocent British girls whose only crime was that their parents are a bunch of weak imbeciles who keep voting for liberals, who keep flooding their island with Muslims who want to murder them. Are we this stupid, people? Are the Europeans so weak and stupid that they would tolerate the violent collapse of their continent to satisfy godless freaks like Katy Perry? Trump is protecting America, but Canada, you’re the next western Europe!

Katy Perry lives in a $19 million estate with a wall. I’m certain she has bodyguards. She has some damn nerve.

He Dindu Nuffin: Father of Manchester Bomber Proclaims Son’s Innocence

SALMAN ABEDI. MANCHESTER SUICIDE BOMBER.

The father of the Manchester suicide bomber has spoken out in defense of his son.

Dear old dad was a refugee, welcomed into Britain. The children and grandchildren of today’s refugees are going to be a security nightmare for West unless someone with the power to do so deports them.

Dad is lying. He is currently in Libya. He should never be allowed back on British soil.

Excerpt from NOLA

CAIRO — The father of the 22-year-old Briton who police say bombed a concert in Manchester insisted Wednesday that his son was innocent and just had been preparing to go on a pilgrimage in Saudi Arabia.

Ramadan Abedi, 51, also known by his nom de guerre of Abu Ismail, spoke to The Associated Press by phone from the Libyan city of Tripoli. He confirmed that his other son, Ismail, had been arrested Tuesday around Manchester by British authorities in the concert attack probe.

“We don’t believe in killing innocents. This is not us,” the senior Abedi said. “We aren’t the ones who blow up ourselves among innocents. We go to mosques. We recite Quran, but not that.”

Authorities say 22 people died and nearly 120 were wounded in the bombing at an Ariana Grande concert

He said last time he spoke to the 22-year-old Salman was five days ago as he was getting ready for a trip to Saudi Arabia to perform Umrah, a smaller pilgrimage to the holy city of Mecca.

“Last time I spoke to him, he sounded normal. There was nothing worrying at all until two days ago (when) I heard the news that they suspect he was the bomber,” Abedi, the father of six children, said.

He said Salman visited Libya a month and a half ago and only returned to Manchester after winning a cheap ticket to Umrah. He said Salman, who was in his second year of studying economics, was planning to return to Libya to spend the holy month of Ramadan with the family. He denied that his son had ever been to Syria.

The senior Abedi worked as a security officer under dictator Moammar Gadhafi’s rule. In 1993, he fled the oil-rich North African country to Saudi Arabia after he was accused of helping Islamists by tipping them off before police raids. He denied having ties to any of Libya’s militant groups, including the Libya Islamic Fighting Group, which was linked to al-Qaida.

“This is nonsense,” he commented, adding that under Gadhafi, “anyone who went to a mosque raised question marks.”

After less than a year in Saudi Arabia, Abu Ismail said he fled to the U.K., where he sought political asylum and lived there for 25 years.

In 2011, Abedi returned to Libya during the mass uprising that descended into a civil war and ended with Gadhafi’s ouster and death. Libya since then sank into lawlessness, with rebels turning into militias and undermining successive transitional governments.

The Abedi family, however, is a close friend to the family of al-Qaida veteran Abu Anas al-Libi, who was snatched by U.S. special forces off a Tripoli street in 2013 then died in US custody in 2015. Al-Libi was on the FBI’s most wanted terrorist list and was accused of having links to the 1998 bombings of two American embassies in Africa.

Britain’s Heroic Katie Hopkins Under Police Investigation for So-Called Manchester Hate Tweet

KATIE.

ibtimes.co.uk

Katie Hopkins has been reported to police for calling for a “final solution” in the aftermath of the terror attack at Manchester Arena which killed 22 people, including children.

In response to a tweet to Good Morning Britain presenter Phillip Schofield, Hopkins tweeted: “22 dead – number rising. Schofield. Don’t you even dare. Do not be part of the problem. We need a final solution.”

Her tweet has since been deleted and rewritten with a message reading “we need a true solution”, but social media users were quick to condemn the Mail Online columnist for originally referencing the Nazi term for the Holocaust.

Hopkins has been reported to the Metropolitan Police over the tweet, but it has not confirmed whether an investigation will be launched.

At least 22 people were killed and dozens injured in a suicide bombing at an Ariana Grande concert at Manchester Arena on Monday night.

Katie was on Fox News with Tucker Carlson Tuesday night. This exchange between Tucker and Katie offers rational opinion.

IJR

Tucker Carlson had Hopkins on his show and asked, flabbergasted, “What’s the point of having a government if they won’t protect your children?”

“They’re investigating you for your tweets in the country that gave the rest of us freedom of speech. This is kind of a philosophical question, but is a the government that is demonstrably unwilling to defend its own children and they are, despite the slogans in the tanks, is that a legitimate government? What’s the point of having a government if they won’t protect your children?”

For her response, Hopkins leveled a blow against the culture of political correctness in her country:

“Absolutely, it seems to me that the establishment and now on the side of anything that represents diversity, or indeed Muslims supporting Islam. We immediately have the greater Manchester Head of Police came out this evening and said, ‘We will not tolerate hate against the Muslim community.’ So many of us, unaware, saying ‘It’s OK, we will tolerate our little 8-year-old girls being slaughtered as they leave a concert, but we won’t tolerate hate speech.’ That seems to be where we’re at in the U.K. Tonight.”

Watch Katie with Tucker:

More Tweets and Retweets from Katie:

The left, the cucks, the Muslims, the “people of color” and the politicians want Katie behind bars. Let’s show her whatever support we can.

Britain’s Tommy Robinson in Manchester: “Politicians have sold us out” (Viral Video)

Tommy Robinson strongly condemns British Muslims.

Four minutes of truth seen so far by over 300,000 people.

Published on May 23, 2017

Tommy Robinson of TheRebel.media reports from Manchester after the May 22 terrorist attack. He explains the shocking links between UK politicians and Islamic terrorists, and the local mosque’s connection with ISIS.

British Musician Morrissey Attacks Queen and Government Over Manchester Bombing

Sitting here in the States, everything Morrissey says makes perfect sense. I take it that in Britain one is not allowed to state certain truths without possibly getting in trouble with the law.

The statements made by the singer are the best I’ve seen coming from a public figure in Britain since the bomb went off Monday night.

The Guardian

The Manchester-born singer Morrissey has hit out at politicians for their reaction to the bombing in his hometown that has killed 22 people and hospitalised 59 more.

In his statement, the former Smiths frontman claimed that politicians are safe from attacks, while the rest of the country is left vulnerable. The MP Jo Cox was murdered by a rightwing extremist last June.

Morrissey cited government immigration policy among his complaints saying the prime minister would never change her immigration policy in the light of the attacks. It is believed that the bomber named by police, Salman Abedi, was British-born and from Manchester.

Morrissey also appeared to suggest that politicians were afraid to refer to Abedi as an Islamist extremist.

The claim that politically correct leaders routinely refuse to mention Islam when referring to terror attacks carried out by people holding a violent interpretation of the religion is common on the far-right. In recent years, many politicians have acknowledged the role of such an ideology once it has been confirmed, while also stressing that it is alien to the vast majority of the religion’s adherents.

“In modern Britain everyone seems petrified to officially say what we all say in private,” the singer wrote on his Facebook page. “Politicians tell us they are unafraid, but they are never the victims. How easy to be unafraid when one is protected from the line of fire. The people have no such protections.

“Manchester mayor Andy Burnham says the attack is the work of an ‘extremist’. An extreme what? An extreme rabbit?”

Criticising the prime minister, he claimed that “her own life is lived in a bullet-proof bubble, and she evidently does not need to identify any young people today in Manchester morgues”.

The musician added: “Also, ‘will not break us’ means that the tragedy will not break her, or her policies on immigration. The young people of Manchester are already broken – thanks all the same, Theresa.”

Morrissey also criticised the London mayor, Sadiq Khan, who he said had failed to condemn the Islamic State group after it claimed responsibility for the attack. A link to the terrorist organisation has not been confirmed by the security services, who are still working to identify whether or not Abedi worked alone or as part of a cell.

In a statement released on Tuesday, Khan said: “London stands united with the great city of Manchester today after this barbaric and sickening attack. This was a cowardly act of terrorism that targeted a concert attended by thousands of children and young people.”

Also in line for criticism from Morrissey was the Queen, who he said had received “absurd praise for her ‘strong words’ against the attack, yet she does not cancel today’s garden party at Buckingham Palace – for which no criticism is allowed in the Britain of free press”.

Terror Threat “Critical:” 3,500 Potential Terrorists Identified in Britain–400 Trained by ISIS in Middle East

Britain’s government claims that the nation is under threat of a second attack by Muslim terrorists. Thus, the military have been deployed throughout the country.

Meanwhile, a recent report of the government documents the extent of the threat.

There’s nothing sensational in the statistics relating to the British fight against terrorism other than the bottom line: What the hell kind of government of the people puts so many of its citizens in danger by allowing terrorists to roam free.

It’s multicultural madness.

All of the muds placed on terror watch lists should have a quick day in court, followed by quick deportation.

Is it any wonder that British PM Teresa May has raised the threat level to critical?

metro.co.uk

Theresa May has increased the UK’s terror threat level from severe to critical in the wake of the Manchester attack.

Critical is the highest possible threat level, and indicates that another attack is imminent.

In an address, the Prime Minister said that military personnel could be deployed to assist police forces across the country.

‘The work undertaken throughout the day has revealed that there is a possibility that we cannot ignore, that there is a wider group of individuals involved in this attack,’ she said.

At least 22 people were killed and 119 injured – 59 of them seriously – after a suicide bomber detonated an explosive at an Ariana Grande concert.

Some 21,000 fans were at the sold-out concert at Manchester Arena, many of them children and teenagers.

FIRST PHOTO OF SALMAN ABEDI, MANCHESTER SUICIDE BOMBER.

It appears that Teresa May is a bit late with her call. The critical threat should have been recognized earlier, as the government has identified a huge number of potential terrorists.

express.co.uk

THE number of potential terrorists being watched in the UK at the time of the Manchester bombing has swelled to nearly 3,500 – but our security services are using powers to monitor them LESS than they did a year ago, Express.co.uk can reveal.

Latest figures show the 3,000 potential terrorists monitored since 2015 has grown after the return of UK-born people who left to fight with ISIS.

About 400 ISIS-trained fighters are believed to have returned from war zones in Syria and Iraq.

Despite being on red alert for more attacks on home soil like last night’s Manchester bombing, new statistics show the number of arrests, stop and searches, and examinations of suspected terrorists at ports and airports dropped in 2016 on the levels seen in 2015.

This comes at the same time the number of people arrested on suspicion of plotting terror strikes on British soil has grown by eight per cent.

In 2016 there were 260 terror-related arrests, a drop of eight per cent on the 282 people held in 2015.

The figures were revealed in a quarterly Home Office report on the use of police powers under the Terrorism Act 2000, which was released in March.

The figures also show that the amount of white people being arrested on suspicion of terrorism has gone up.

Seventy (25 per cent) of the people arrested in 2015 were white, while 91 (35 per cent) of those held last year were white.

Last year 13 per cent (35) of arrests were of people suspected of plotting terror attacks on British soil, a sharp rise on the five per cent (15) of such arrests in 2015.

The report said: “Of the 260 arrests for terrorism-related offences in the year ending 31 December 2016, 96 had resulted in a charge by January 16 2017 (79 terrorism-related and 17 non-terrorism-related).

“In 68 cases, the individual had been released without charge; in a further 90 cases, the arrestee was released on bail pending further investigation.”

The use of a power for officers to question people entering or leaving the country at ports, airports, international rail stations and in border areas fell dramatically by 30 per cent in 2016 compared to 2015.

In 2015, the power was used around 27,800 times, but this fell to 19,355 last year.

Under the power, people can be detained for up to nine hours, with DNA samples and fingerprints taken, without the need for any reasonable suspicion.

The report said: “When necessary they may also detain and search individuals. “The aim is to determine whether that person appears to be someone who is or has been concerned in the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism.

“In the year ending 31 December 2016, a total of 19,355 persons were examined under this power in Great Britain, a fall of 30 per cent on the previous year.

“This has continued the decline in the use of the power in recent years.”

It does not explain in the report why the number has dropped, but there has been pressure from groups like Stop Watch, which argues they infringe the human rights of Muslims and other communities.

The so-called rights of Muslims are a red herring. The Muslim religion, a political system grafted onto God, violates the NAP (non-aggression principle). Natural law means that people have a right to defend themselves against Islam.

By. Any. Means. Necessary.