Jones vs. Kelly: Finally Over?

The embedded video above shows Alex Jones, Mike Cernovich, and Steve Pieczenik talking about the lies and distortions that Megyn Kelly brought to the table with her segment on Jones Sunday night.

NBC is blocking the publication of Megyn Kelly’s “interview” with Alex Jones on youtube. You can watch it on the Megyn Kelly webpage.

Kelly’s interview is a hatchet job. Until I heard the biased language coming from Kelly and her guests I never knew that anyone considered the Fat Man to be offensive because of his presentation of alternate views of some of the major news events of this century–9/11, the Sandy Hook shootings, Obama’s birth certificate, and more. The thing that bothered most of the conspiracy realists I follow was his failure to address the Jewish Question.

You have to believe that the sudden mainstream media interest in Jones is related to his relationship with President Donald Trump. By smearing Jones, some of the mud splatters upon Trump too.

When you consider that the press smears Trump a dozen times a day, seven days a week with their fake news narratives, why would anyone trust the press to tell the truth about Jones or any other “deplorable”?

Furthermore, when you consider the Neocon’s love of war and hostility to freedom, why would you trust the government to tell the truth?

All of the stories related to Kelly’s 17 minutes of anti-Jones, anti-Trump material stick with the narrative that Jones is evil and dangerous.

Excerpt from Variety

The one strong takeaway from the entire segment was that Jones is newsworthy and dangerous because he has the ear of our volatile president. The segment starts with that sentiment, and then proceeds to enumerate various situations in which Jones is a concerning public figure (including an interview with Neil Heslin, who lost his son in the Sandy Hook tragedy). Then it ends. To be sure, Kelly is right to observe that the connection is worth investigating. But the “Sunday Night” segment doesn’t seem like investigating; it’s instead a wind-up to a punch with no subsequent impact.

At least Variety acknowledges Kelly’s failures. But that’s probably because liberals hate her for her prior association with Fox News.

Excerpt from Deadline

One of Kelly’s fiercest critics, watchdog site Media Matters, called the broadcast “a report that was originally billed as a self-promotional head-to-head showdown with Alex Jones but got turned into “a well-edited investigation of the dangers posed by an unstable megalomaniac with millions of loyal fans, including one in the Oval Office” owing to a “well-deserved firestorm of denunciations.”

Insisting that Kelly deserves little credit for the changes the org warned its damage already had been done, saying “the network’s impotent reaction to Jones’ own grabs for media attention may allow the nation’s biggest producer of conspiracy theory media to come out the winner of tonight’s program.”

Jones seemed to agree. On YouTube, he live-streamed himself breaking open a bottle of champagne and calling the broadcast a big win.

Kellybots will follow her lead and spend Monday at the watercooler at work echoing the nonsense that Jones is dangerous. He may be loud and he may not get everything right and he may even be controlled opposition, but questioning 9/11 and Sandy Hook is patriotic, not dangerous.

The dirtbags at NBC and the liberal media don’t understand the appeal of Alex Jones. I could only find one article that treats him fairly.

Excerpt from American Thinker

Considering the longer term, Jones is in touch with and riding the wave of a powerful new meme that’s gaining currency worldwide. Its adherents believe that the game is stacked against the middle class as powerful and often unseen Deep State actors, globalists, the media, academia, popular culture, government bureaucracies, and other corrupt players conspire to transform for the worse life as we know it. Peaceful opposition to this onslaught is, as Jones has defined it – the Infowar. The Internet and the new media are making more plausible a worldwide wake-up call and a paradigm shift in information, awareness, and action. And they aren’t going away.

Meanwhile, one wonders what the NBC suits are thinking now about their widely reported $15 million-plus investment in their new golden girl, Megyn Kelly. She is decidedly not an Infowarrior or open in the least to the emerging new paradigm. And as her work at NBC is demonstrating, she is not even a good journalist.

Styx, not a fan of Jones or Kelly also gets it.

Twitter reactions:

The Historical Truth About the Civil War (Video)

This (((Steve Pieczenik))) video offers a critical look at Abraham Lincoln. In Steve’s eyes Lincoln is NOT a great president, but a terrible one. I think the video offers some truth, but not all of it.

To get at more of the truth, I’ve embedded a youtube comment that focuses on the role of (((bankers))) as the cause of the American civil war.

Published on Nov 17, 2016

Abraham Lincoln was gay. The Civil War was not about freeing the slaves. Lincoln was actually quoted as being abhorrently racist. Get the truth about the Civil War in this episode of Historic Truths w/ Steve R. Pieczenik.

An alternate view to that presented by Pieczenik is offered in this youtube comment:

Pieczenik, this is not accurate. It is true that “freeing the slaves” was not the primary casus belli, although modern court historians give it undeserved attention. If freeing the slaves were the cause for the war, the North would have simply purchased the slaves from their owners at market value, and banned slavery thereafter. This would have been orders of magnitude cheaper than war. That this wasn’t done is all one needs to know in order to understand that slavery was not the war’s cause, although it made (and still makes) for great propaganda.

Fundamentally it was a currency war, as most wars are. The United States was not under a Rothschild owned central bank, but had freed itself during the revolutionary war from just that. Few people today know that the Revolutionary War was fought primarily to free the colonies from the British central bank, and not as a “tax revolt,” although the taxes themselves would have never been necessary if the British currency was not a representation of private debt.

The Rothschild dynasty viewed the free colonies as a threat, and sought to Balkanize the country to make it more manageable and more susceptible to coercion. Luckily for the US, Czarist Russia, themselves an enemy of the Rothschild dynasty and who had quelled multiple Rothschild funded pseudo-communist rebellions in their own country, aligned with Lincoln and gave the North victory primarily through the means of the Russian fleet. This fleet effectively prevented the Rothschilds from exerting their desired influence in order to bolster the South. Balkanization was prevented.

Further exacerbating the war was Lincoln’s decision to fund it with Federal Dollars, rather than borrowing from Rothschild banks. Lincoln’s aim for the war was, above all else, the centralization of Federal power and the coalescence of the states into one unified nation. He felt that the notion that individual states were sovereign participants in a union from which they could freely depart had to be destroyed or else the country would be swept away by its foes.

Was 600,000 (mostly white) deaths worth it? We’ll never know. We do know that, regardless of the Civil War, the United States was later co-opted by the banking dynasties via the Federal Reserve. These are all facts that our good friends like (((Pieczenik))) prefer not to mention.

Coup v. Counter-Coup: The Hillary Clinton Takeover of the United States (Video)

UPDATE: After I wrote this and saved it as a draft, Drudge posted the link to this video in his headlines. It’s gone viral since then.

This video by noted conspiracy theorist Steve Pieczenik explains some of the background to the current rigged system. He states flat out that the Clintons staged a silent coup, taking over the American government. He also talks about the counter-coup that is still raging as I type.

I’m not sure whether all of this is a Jew trick, designed to lull the goy into a false sense of security or is an insider expose of the truth. If the Clintons have staged a silent coup, they are only the front men for the Jews pulling their strings.

According to his Wikipedia page, Pieczenik is a Jew. He has served at the seat of power for much of his life, working for Henry Kissinger, for example. Thus, can this life long insider be trusted?

Consider this:

On May 3, 2011, radio host Alex Jones aired an interview in which Pieczenik claimed that Osama bin Laden had died of Marfan syndrome in 2001 shortly after the September 11 attacks, and that the attacks on the United States on 9/11 were part of a false flag operation by entities within the American government, the Israeli leadership and Mossad.[31]

Got that? A Jew goes onto Alex Jones show and says that Jews did 9/11. He’s also articulated many other conspiracy theories. I hope that Pieczenik is legit and that the counter-coup is successful.

For sure, something big is in the air. Everyone I know is anxious, worried, unable to sleep. They know something is up. This is not a normal election.