Torrid Tale of Interracial Lesbian Love Takes Top Honors at TV’s Emmy Awards

According to queer Twitter, the whole world is jumping in to celebrate two women licking each others bushy areas. And not just any two taco bumpers, but one white and one black.

Yeah, let’s see how I can celebrate. If I had a dog, I’d send him to the refrigerator to get me a beer.

I’m certain that dogs grabbing beers out of fridges are more entertaining than two rug munchers portrayed sympathetically by Hollyweird.

Exactly what sort of reprobate mind thinks this that we should all be celebrating their degeneracy and perversion, I’m not sure. All I can say is that they’re not normal.

Lesbian sexual acts should be made illegal again, as they were until the Supreme Court weighed in.

Huffington Post

The Emmy Awards gloriously embraced queer storytelling this year, and the cherry on top of the sundae was “Black Mirror” picking up prizes for perhaps its most affecting installment to date, “San Junipero.”

The critically acclaimed episode, which revolves around two woman falling in love in an ’80s-set alternate universe, won Outstanding TV Movie, as well as Outstanding Writing for a Limited Series, Movie, or Dramatic Special on Sunday night.

Writer Charlie Brooker took the stage to accept both awards, low-key encouraging an Emmys orgy in his second speech.

“I have heard 2017 described as being trapped, like being trapped in one long unending ‘Black Mirror’ episode,” Brooker said. “But I like to think if I had written it, it wouldn’t be quite so on the nose with all this sort of Nazis and hate.”

“‘San Junipero’ was a story about love and love will defeat hated, love will win. But it might need a bit of help,” he continued. “So maybe if all the beautiful people in this auditorium could start to physically make love with each other, or yourselves, on the count of three, this world would be a far better place. Three, two, one, go.”

After a nervous laugh from a reluctant audience, Brooker concluded, “OK, fine, suit yourself.”

Heartfelt tributes to the episode came pouring in on social media soon after with many noting the importance of the Television Academy recognizing a story about a loving interracial relationship between queer women.

Queer Twitter was indeed out in force Sunday night.

Yes, faggots are elated tonight. But for others, the hatred of the sodomite grows stronger.

Are Negroes Compatible With White Society? Can they be Integrated or is the Intelligence Gap Too Wide?

A member of the GLP Forum makes the argument that blacks should be segregated away from whites on the basis of IQ alone.

GLP

The first thing I am going to say so that there is no misunderstanding that as a student of anthropology I AM a “racist”. I believe there are distinct characteristics of the major races that preclude any rational or logical claim that they are “equal”. While I believe in equal opportunity for all, I do not believe in special considerations being made that favor some people over others, and this includes affirmative action or race quotas in hiring or higher education enrollment.

I believe the unrest and the racial conflict are inevitable, simply because no matter how many advantages we give them the average negro will never be able to rise to the social and economic positions of the white.

The fact is (and it is a scientific fact), the average IQ of an “African American” in the United states is a little less than 85.2, while the average IQ of a white is 100. Does this make a significant difference? Well first of all you have o understand what IQ means , and how it is measured. IQ is basically a measure of raw intelligence, the ability to process , understand and use information. It does not account for specific abilities.

Link to thealternativehypothesis.org

Link to todayifoundout.com

That being said a difference of 15 IQ points is extremely significant, especially when it is 85 as opposed to 100.

100 is intentionally set as the average IQ and is meant as a means of identifying people of below and above average IQ. If you’re above 100 you’re above average, and if your 15 points below 100, you’re WAY below average.

Less than 7% of whites have an IQ at or below 85, half of blacks do.

While 50% of whites have an IQ above 100, less than 17% of blacks have an IQ above average in the United States. In Africa or less developed countries where little racial mixing has occurred, the average IQ of blacks can be as low as 70 such as in sub Saharan Africa.

So it is easy to see that there is a huge disparity between the intelligence of Whites and blacks. It is noteworthy to mention Asians have an average IQ slightly higher than whites, at 104.3, which for all intents and purposes is insignificant hen determining social compatibility. It is obvious whites and Asians can integrate successfully based on average intelligence alone.

But 15% IS a significant difference that without a doubt has profound effects on the ability of an individual to function is a social construct “designed” primarily around an average IQ of 100.

So how can we define an average IQ of 85? Well, 85 is 15 points above what is technically referred to as mentally retarded or in politically correct terminology “mentally challenged”.

So the average black is not in fact mentally retarded, and is a full 15 IQ points above what is considered a “moron”.

But what about that >30% of blacks born in America that do fall under the threshold of a 70 IQ?

Greater than 30% of all blacks in America are technically mentally retarded.

What this means in psychological terms is they unable to unlikely to be able to be able to function in normal social situations, like for instance schooling, marriages and jobs.

For the half of Negroes above 85 IQ but below significantly below 100, integrating is challenging but not impossible or even unlikely.

The problem is half of them aren’t smart enough to function in the way our society is set up, and almost a 1/3 are going to find it near to impossible to.

And this is why we have racial inequality in America despite every effort to mitigate it. It doesn’t have anything whatsoever to do with oppression or “white privileged” , it has to do primarily with intelligence. An intelligent black man has MANY advantages over a white with equal intelligence, the problem is they are so few in number that we see few blacks in educated professional jobs with college degrees they actually earned on the sole qualification of merit.

SO naturally being the wide disparity of social success among whites and blacks despite the attempts to establish an impossible equality that has not been successful, blacks are in a continuous state of malevolent envy.

They for the most part are unable to comprehend or accept that their inequality with whites is a product of their own deficiencies, so as Abraham Lincoln said, the black man will never be able to integrate into white society and for their own good as well as for the good of whites should be segregated permanently from whites.

None of this is opinion, it is fact. WHile there are many blacks that can integrate, there are many who cannot, and since we can’t just give them IQ tests and ship the ones that come up below 70 or 85 or whatever arbitrary number we decide to set back to Africa, the only thing we can logically do is segregate them according to intelligence. That is to say we need to do away with quotas and affirmative action and allow the merits system to work.

Cord Cutting Explodes as 56 Million Americans Do Without Pay TV

While Americans are pulling the plug on cable TV, there’s never any analysis of why, so let me speculate.

I know a woman who is totally disgusted by her soap operas that she’s watched for decades. Seeing a naked white male in bed with a naked Negro male, the two of them kissing, isn’t her cup of tea. It’s soured her on the whole TV viewing experience. There’s way too much diversity for her.

For similar reasons, I stopped watching TV, other than the news, documentaries, and old movies, around 1992 or even earlier. So-called entertainment was anything but entertaining.

Millions are feeling the vibe that TV is not a necessity. I’ll bet most of them are white.

Excerpt from Techcrunch

Bad news for traditional pay TV: cord cutting is accelerating at a pace faster than previously estimated. According to a new industry report from eMarketer, there will be 22.2 million cord cutters ages 18 and older this year – a figure that’s up 33.2 percent over 2016. The firm said it’s had to revise its forecast as the pace of cord cutting has increased. Previously, it believed there would only be 15.4 million cord cutters in the U.S.

In addition, the so-called “cord-nevers” – meaning those consumers who never choose to subscribe to traditional cable or satellite TV in the first place – is growing, too. While the pace of that growth is slower – a more modest 5.8 percent this year – the total number of cord-nevers is higher. eMarketer says there will be 34.4 million U.S. adult cord-nevers in 2017.

When you combine the cord cutters and cord-nevers, there will be 56.6 million U.S. non-pay TV viewers this year.

By 2021, eMarketer says the number of cord cutters will nearly equal the number of cord-nevers with 40.1 million for the former, and 41 million for the latter.

The firm attributes its revised forecast, in part, to the growing list of live streaming and over-the-top platforms that are now available.

In addition to existing players like Sling TV and PlayStation Vue, in under a year’s time we’ve seen new entrants in the live TV streaming space like AT&T’s DirecTV Now, which arrived late last year; YouTube TV, which launched in April; and Hulu Live TV, which arrived in May. There’s also a growing number of sports streaming services, including fuboTV and Stadium. Meanwhile, major companies have announced similar plans to enter the live streaming space, including CBS Sports and ESPN.

And that’s just live streaming TV.

The on-demand market, which includes Netflix, Amazon, Hulu, HBO, and others, is growing, too. Even Disney is prepping its own Netflix competitor.

“Younger audiences continue to switch to either exclusively watching [over-the-top] video or watching them in combination with free TV options,: noted Chris Bendtsen, eMarketer’s senior forecasting analyst.

“Last year, even the Olympics and presidential elections could not prevent younger audiences from abandoning pay TV,” Bendtsen added.

Another factor accounting for the decline in pay TV viewership has to do with the way we’re now watching video content. U.S. adults simply aren’t watching TV as much as they used to, says eMarketer. The average time spent watching TV, excluding digital, will drop 3.1 percent to 3 hours, 58 minutes – that’s the first time it’s fallen below 4 hours per day, eMarketer notes.

Digital video viewing, meanwhile, has jumped up 9.3 percent over 2016 to reach 1 hour, 17 minutes.

Youtube Star PewDiePie Says “Nigger” During Live Stream–Left Currently Going Beserk

BBC

The world’s highest-paid YouTube star, PewDiePie, has used the “n-word” during an online broadcast.

The 27-year-old Swede – real name Felix Kjellberg – could be heard using the racial slur while he was playing a video game during a live streaming.

After using the term, he apologised and said: “I don’t mean that in a bad way.”

He has previously had to defend himself over allegations of anti-Semitism, and was suspended from Twitter for making jokes about so-called Islamic State.

In February, some of his videos were found to contain Nazi references or anti-Semitic imagery, which resulted in Disney cutting ties with him.

PewDiePie has more than 57m subscribers on YouTube.

He is reported to have made $15m (£11m) through YouTube last year – he gets billions of views per month and generates vast amounts of income from advertising.

He had been associated with Disney via Maker Studios, a company with a network of YouTube stars.

‘Insane claims’
In February, Disney said that while Mr Kjellberg had a reputation for being provocative and irreverent, some of the videos he made were “inappropriate”.

In one of the controversial videos, Mr Kjellberg paid two people through a crowd-sourcing website to hold up a sign which read “Death to all Jews”.

PewDiePie accepted the material was offensive, but said he did not support “any kind of hateful attitudes”.

He said that the anti-Semitism claims were “insane” and “unfair”, adding: “I am sorry for the words I used as I know they offended people.”

YouTube cancelled the release of Mr Kjellberg’s new series Scare PewDiePie 2.

Not being a PewDiePie fan, I don’t watch his stuff. But I stand in solidarity with him for his right to say any words he likes. Apparently, one of his business partners is pulling the plug, though.

This in turn riled up Styx, who is riling up his fans through Twitter.

I can’t boycott a business that I don’t do business with, but I get the idea.

What’s important to me is the right to be able to say or write the N-word freely without any negative consequences.

Trump urges Supreme Court: Uphold Right to Refuse Sodomite ‘wedding’ Cakes

JACK PHILLIPS. SAYING NO TO FAGGOTRY CAN GET YOU IN TROUBLE.

Homosexual acts were criminal in some states until the Supreme Court’s Lawrence decision in 2003. They should be recriminalized because they are in opposition to nature. As to trannies, well …

Excerpt from Lifesite News

In a move that LGBT proponents are calling “shocking,” President Trump’s Department of Justice (DOJ) filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of the Colorado baker who was found to have violated the state’s anti-discrimination act for declining to bake a cake to celebrate a “gay wedding.”

In 2012, a gay couple visited the Masterpiece Cakeshop in Lakewood, Colorado, seeking to commission the creation of a cake for their gay wedding. Owner Jack Phillips declined to make the cake because same-sex “marriage” stands in opposition to his religious beliefs. The two men were not seeking to buy an off-the-shelf product; they wanted Phillips to use his talent to create a unique product – a work of art.

Phillips directed the two men to other shops that could provide such a service for them, which they eventually did. But the angered men later engaged the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) to bring a punitive case against Phillips and his business that would compel him to act against his conscience.

Contrary to many news headlines and stories about the Masterpiece Cakeshop case, this issue isn’t about refusing to sell a product to gay customers. It’s about whether or not a state government has the right to compel an artist, under penalty of law, to use his artistry in way that violates his conscience.

In order not to be in violation of the law, Phillips has ceased his custom wedding cake services and has had to release six of his 10 employees.

From the outset of the new administration, the Trump White House and the DOJ have pledged to uphold religious liberty.

“Forcing Phillips to create expression for and participate in a ceremony that violates his sincerely held religious beliefs invades his First Amendment rights,” wrote Acting Solicitor General Jeffrey B. Wall, one of the authors of the Supreme Court brief. “Weddings are sacred rites in the religious realm and profoundly symbolic ceremonies in the secular one.”

The brief, addressed to the nine Supreme Court justices, reminds them that even the majority opinion in the Obergfell case, which legalized same-sex “marriage” across the country, emphasized upholding First Amendment protections for religious objectors:

“[T]he Court has recognized that opposition to same-sex marriage ‘long has been held — and continues to be held — in good faith by reasonable and sincere people,’ and that “[m]any who deem same-sex marriage to be wrong reach that conclusion based on decent and honorable religious or philosophical premises.”

The brief goes on to point out an important irony of the case: “Indeed, when Phillips declined to create a custom wedding cake for Craig and Mullins [the gay couple seeking to commission a wedding cake] in July 2012, Colorado refused to recognize either same-sex marriages or same-sex civil unions … In other words, the State itself did not acknowledge the validity of the union it sought to compel petitioners to celebrate. It was not until October 2014, after federal courts had ruled that Colorado’s same-sex marriage laws were invalid, that the State began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples.”

Slate offers a liberal’s view of the right of the state to force bakers to make faggot cakes.

I’m not enough of an expert to know how the Supreme Court will rule. I know that natural law says that no one should be able to compel a business to produce a product that it’s owners do not want to make. Competition in the free market will ensure that sodomites have their cakes. But Christians should not be compelled to make them.

Nurses Suspended After Opening Body Bag to View Man’s Large Penis

It’s just a hunch, but if the truth about the five nurses who got their jollies by checking out a dead man’s junk were to be revealed, I’m betting they would be Hispanic. Latinos are known the world over for their “hot blood,” aka degenerate sexual mores.

Whatever their ethnicity, there’s something wrong with anyone checking out the private areas of the dead. Read the story carefully and you’ll see that the sex of the nurses is not revealed. We don’t know whether they are men, women, or both. If I were betting, my bet would be on faggot nurses doing the gawking.

The Denver Channel

DENVER – Five nurses at Denver Health Medical Center were suspended for three weeks after they inappropriately viewed a deceased patient’s body and talked about it, a hospital spokesman confirmed to Denver7 Investigates Tuesday.

A tip to Denver7 said the nurses disciplined admired the size of the deceased patient’s genitals and at one point opened a body bag to view parts of the body. A hospital spokesman confirmed details of the incident.

A different nurse heard one of the disciplined nurses make a comment in May that the nurse felt was inappropriate and reported it to hospital staff, Denver Health Medical Center spokesman Josh Rasmussen said.

“Multiple staff members viewed the victim while he was incapacitated, including after he was deceased,” a Denver Police report says. “The complainant, Risk Management for Denver Health, made a mandatory report.”

Rasmussen originally said two nurses were disciplined after the internal investigation, but later said five nurses were suspended following the investigation’s conclusion.

The report says the incidents occurred between March 31 and April 3, 2017, but weren’t reported until May 8.

Rasmussen said although the nurses received discipline considered “serious,” four nurses ultimately returned to work. One nurse no longer is employed by the hospital, but wasn’t terminated. The nurses will have a record of the discipline placed in their personnel files, Rasmussen said.

Denver Police confirm they responded to the incident but say the decision was made to have Denver Health Medical Center handle the issue internally.

“A DPD officer did speak with one of our on-call prosecutors at the time,” Ken Lane, communications director for the Denver District Attorney’s Office, said. “They determined there was insufficient evidence to prove a crime was committed, no charges were filed, and referred the matter back to Denver Health to handle internally.”

Rasmussen said he could not provide the names of the nurses involved. He said the nurses worked in a medical unit of the hospital but did not disclose which unit.

The scenario described in this sordid story is reminiscent of a low budget porn movie. Presumably, looking but not touching is not against the law, but touching would have brought abuse of a corpse charges.

Whatever, these five ghouls had better take a cold shower and watch their step in the future.

STOCK PHOTO.

To All Our Illegal Friends: Here’s Cher’s Address

It’s the big house on the Pacific Coast Highway in Mailibu.

Don’t bother to thank me now, you can thank me later, after you enjoy Cher’s hospitality for a few years. But don’t forget, I’m the guy that tipped you off.