White Protesters Hold Dumb Signs in Front of Richard Spencer’s Office

When the Day of the Rope comes, remember the white race traitors. Until then, if anyone is a member of 4 chan, these white anti-Spencer twats need to be doxxed over there so that they can be boycotted or fired, if they have jobs. The guy holding the baby looks like a male version of a young cat lady.

NBC Washington

A group of protesters gathered Sunday outside the offices of Richard Spencer, the white nationalist who is credited with coining the term “alt-right.”

Protesters have convened outside Spencer’s Virginia offices regularly in recent months, but the organizers said Sunday’s gathering was larger than usual. The protest came a day after racist fliers with messages including “Stop the blacks” and “You’re losing your country, white man” were found in Alexandria, Virginia.

Sunday’s protesters held signs saying “White supremacy not welcome” and “Love not hate.”

Ironic, given that they HATE us. That’s a topic Richard Spencer addressed in his 2015 address at the Amren conference.

This video is probably Spencer’s best work.

“It’s particularly important that we lead the way for our kids,” said one protester, who gave his name only as Allen. “I would like to believe that some of the explicit racism and implicit racism that’s still around here will be a thing of the past in their generation. But if not, we need to teach them to stand up.”

Alexandria residents woke up Saturday morning to find racist flyers on poles and car windows. The images on some of the fliers are the same as those on a white supremacist website that endorses “American fascism.”

Mayor Allison Silberberg issued a statement, saying the city denounces “hate speech and hate crimes and discrimination in all forms.”

Silberberg? Damn! Another Jew against free speech!

MAYOR ALLISON SILBERBERG.

University Launching Anti-Hate “Action Plan” Following White on Black Stabbing Death

WALLACE LOH, VIRTUE SIGNALING PRESIDENT, UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND.

When white students are victimized by black thugs on campus, I wonder if the University of Maryland will engage in the kind of worthless, disgusting virtue signaling that sh*tstain President Wallace Loh has done this week.

You may have noticed that when a white person commits a crime against a black individual, it’s a hate crime, but the reverse is rarely true. As long as there is so-called diversity on campus and there are fools trying to make it work, there are going to be so-called hate crimes occurring.

Anti-hate = anti-white.

WTOP

University of Maryland President Wallace Loh outlined new anti-hate initiatives Wednesday in the wake of last weekend’s fatal campus stabbing.

The killing of Lt. Richard Collins III, a Bowie State University student who was set to graduate this week, is being investigated as a possible hate crime. Suspect Sean Christopher Urbanski was reportedly a member of a white supremacist Facebook group called “Alt-Reich: Nation.”

FOR ONCE THE WHITE KID ISN’T THE DEAD ONE.

Wednesday evening, Loh urged students to allow authorities the time “to do their work with due diligence.”

But beyond that, he said, “we must do more.”

The action plan, which is effective immediately, is comprised of these initial steps:

Establishing a hate-bias and campus safety task force — composed of faculty, staff, students and alumni — to review relevant policies and procedures. That task force will then submit a report with recommendations and guidelines;

Creating a rapid-response team — composed of faculty, staff and students — to provide support for victims of hate-bias incidents;

Allocating $100,000 in supplemental funds to the Office of Diversity and Inclusion for supporting diversity and inclusion efforts;

Production of an annual report on all campus hate-bias incidents;

Asking the university’s Athletic Council to consider ways to strengthen intercollegiate athletics policy to prohibit hate-bias symbols or actions in any venue.

More actions will be rolled out after the hate-bias and campus safety task force submits its recommendations, Loh said.

“We all want a culture that rejects hate and forges a more perfect union in our nation’s rich multicultural and multiethnic diversity,” he said.

“But these are fraught times, on our campus, across the nation, and the world. It is on all of us to stand up and fight the racism, extremism, and hate that are cancers in our body politic.”

URBANSKI IS A BIRD LOVER? SO WHAT!

Buzzfeed and other media outlets are reporting that Urbanski was a member of a Facebook group called Alt-Reich Nation. Before anyone jumps to the conclusion that he plotted a murder, Buzzfeed also reports that Urbanski appeared to be drunk and possibly on drugs. After stabbing Collins, Urbanski was arrest while sitting on a bench 50 feet from the scene of the crime.

Judging from the description of Alt-Reich Nation, it seems to be a race realist site, dedicated to exposing anti-white and anti-male bias. Naturally, the police are pretending to be shocked and appalled by the site.

SAMPLE MEME FROM ALT-REICH NATION.

ANOTHER MEME FROM THE SITE.

War on Normal White Men: UC Berkeley Professor Fired Over Sexual Harassment Accusations

ERIN BENNETT, LEFT, KATHLEEN GUTIERREZ, CENTER.

Three women losers who are so dainty and delicate that a male flirting with them caused them to break down and lose their ability to function in school won a big victory when Professor Blake Wentworth was fired.

His flirtatious interest in three mildly attractive students who appear to be in their mid-20s has made international news for the last two years.

First the story, then some commentary.

The Guardian

The University of California has fired a professor who was accused of sexually harassing multiple students, nearly two years after campus investigators first concluded he had made unwanted advances and violated school policies.

The dismissal of assistant professor Blake Wentworth – who sued the women who filed harassment complaints against him – marks a rare instance of termination of a faculty member accused of sexual misconduct at the prestigious public university.

BLAKE WENTWORTH.

The allegations that the professor of south and south-east Asian studies at UC Berkeley sexually harassed and inappropriately touched female students he was overseeing contributed to a major scandal, sparking an international debate about sexism and discrimination in academia.

Two graduate students and one undergraduate shared their accounts with the Guardian last year, arguing that Wentworth’s mistreatment of them had derailed their studies and careers and that the university had repeatedly failed to support them and hold the faculty member accountable.

Attorneys for Wentworth – who filed a defamation suit against the three women in September and has sued the university – said in a statement on Wednesday that the university was trying to distract from an ongoing financial scandal and that he continues to deny the “false assertions, which are a pretext to discriminate and retaliate against him”.

Evidence in his pending lawsuit will show that UC embarked on a “campaign to ruin his career”, the lawyers added.

It’s unclear why the decision to terminate the professor took so long. The university substantiated the first claim of harassment against one of the graduate students in October 2015, and the three women filed formal complaints with state investigators more than a year ago.

The university concluded that Wentworth made unwelcome sexual advances against grad student Kathleen Gutierrez, who accused Wentworth of grabbing her hand and saying, “I could lose my job over this … but I’m just so attracted to you.” He also allegedly came up behind her and wrapped his hands around her head and made offensive comments about a strip club.

BENNETT AND GUTIERREZ.

Erin Bennett, the other grad student, accused Wentworth of inappropriately touching her and making comments about sex during their one-on-one independent study in her first semester at the school. The process of reporting the harassment took a toll on her mental health and led her to take a leave of absence, she said.

Wentworth, a tenure-track professor, allegedly told undergraduate student Nicole Hemenway that she was a “gorgeous young woman”, calling her “honey bear” and saying that others in the department were “jealous that such beautiful young women are always coming and going from my office”.

NICOLE HEMENWAY, UNDERGRAD, AGE 24.

More details on Mestizo Hemenway’s story reveal that Hemenway considers Wentworth to be middle-aged and that his attention to her made her skin crawl.

Victim mentality? Much!

The story also reveals that the professor’s “inappropriate touching” involved putting his hands on hers.

On Wednesday, Hemenway said that the dismissal would not have happened if the students hadn’t devoted significant resources to fighting the case.

“This firing was our doing. The university gets to put their name on the decision, but they were perfectly happy not doing anything,” she said by phone. “This was because of student organizing efforts.”

You won’t want to watch much of this boring video, but it does give you a good look at Blake Wentworth and his manner of communicating.

So what is going on here?

First, I can assure you that there is a huge amount of sexual activity taking place between professors and students at all universities. It’s virtually always consensual. It’s often student initiated. And a disproportionate amount of it involves feminist lesbian women professors seducing young coeds confused about their gender identity.

Secondly, no university that I am aware of has specific instructions regarding what is considered sexual harassment and what is OK. The general rule is that “romantic relationships” between a professor and his or her own students is forbidden. Once the teacher-student relationship is over, the parties are free to do as they wish.

Third, at my former university, the policy was always to side with the female when a complaint was lodged against a male professor. The idea of challenging some of the nut job feminist students who populate universities was off the table. I never heard of any female professor facing any consequences for her sexual indiscretions.

Now, coming to the specifics of the Blake Wentworth case, the following thoughts occur to me.

1. Two of the ladies are nonwhite and the third one has that short, feminist haircut and mode of dress that sets off alarms in my mind. Wentworth ought to have avoided all three. The two Latinas come across as having a grudge against whites. What’s interesting though is that THEY PICKED HIM TO WORK WITH. They could have picked anyone. Students have to seek out a professor to work with when doing one on one work.

2. Wentworth sexually assaulted no one. It’s ridiculous to call putting hands on hands “inappropriate touching.” This is not Victorian England. I guarantee you that all of these women are highly sexually experienced, with lewd sexual appetites. I only met a few “innocent” coeds during my time at the university and they were 18 year old freshmen.

3. I strongly suspect that these women were flirtatious with the professor. I cannot speculate what turned their willingness to play the mating game into a vendetta.

4. As I read the story, none of them explicitly told Wentworth that his flirtations were unwanted. This is another example of where women expect a man to read her mind.

5. Wentworth is stupid, but probably not evil. In a reasonable workplace setting a boss might have called him in and warned him to cool it.

6. I reiterate my general principle that every male has the right to woo any female of his choice, while she has the right to reject him. And believe me, these girls know how to reject guys in bars. Watching guys get shot down in Texas bars used to be one of my hobbies decades ago when I briefly explored the singles bar scene.

Am I wrong? Does Wentworth deserve to be fired? To have zero future job prospects? To be a target of hate from social justice warriors?

White-Women-Owned Portland Burrito Shop Forced to Close Amid Accusations of Cultural Appropriation

Two young white women (they appear to be liberal hipsters) have learned that Mexicans rule their liberal Oregon city.

The brouhaha over their using authentic Mexican recipes to make tortillas for their burritos has forced them to shut their business.

While I have more sympathy for the Christian bakery that was driven out of business for refusing to bake a “gay” wedding cake, these ladies also merit our attention.

Fox News

Just one week after Kooks Burritos in Portland, Ore., was featured in a profile for local publication Willamette Week, the pop-up Mexican food cart has closed down amid accusations that they ripped off their recipes.

Kali Wilgus and Liz “LC” Connelly, the two white women who started Kooks earlier this year, have been accused of stealing their techniques from the “tortilla ladies” of Puerto Nuevo, Mexico — because Connelly told Willamette Week that they gathered their recipes and tortilla-making processes during a holiday road-trip to the Baja California village.

KOOKS BURRITOS.

“I picked the brains of every tortilla lady there in the worst broken Spanish ever, and they showed me a little of what they did,” she told the site. “They told us the basic ingredients, and we saw them moving and stretching the dough similar to how pizza makers do before rolling it out with rolling pins.”

In the profile, which first ran May 16, Connelly also claimed that, when the Mexican cooks wouldn’t give up their trade secrets, she and Wilgus “were peeking into the windows of every kitchen, totally fascinated by how easy they made it look.”

Connelly then said she used a trial-and-error process to recreate a tortilla with the same flavor and texture after returning to Portland. She and Wilgus then opened their weekend pop-up inside a taco truck on SE Cesar Estrada Chavez Boulevard, and began serving their Mexican-style tortillas filled with California-inspired ingredients.

Though the eatery had been open for several months, the owners of Kooks were only recently accused of cultural appropriation by The Portland Mercury and Mic.com based on Connelly’s revelations.

“Because of Portland’s underlying racism, the people who rightly own these traditions and cultures that exist are already treated poorly,” The Portland Mercury said, calling the closure of Kooks a “victory.”

The article continues,”These appropriating businesses are erasing and exploiting their already marginalized identities for the purpose of profit and praise.”

Although whites are still a majority in America, the war on whites is in full bloom. Everywhere, everyday, there’s some new denial of the right to be white. In this instance, whites are denied the right to make ethnic food. Next, whites will be denied the right to eat ethnic food. Ultimately, whites will be denied the right to earn a living and to eat.

The time for resistance is now. Remember Kooks!

Mother Jones Editor Claims Military Use of “Tomahawk missiles” Name Offends American Indians

Any time leftists go off on ridiculous flights of fancy into the realm of political correctness, should we assume that it’s a cry for help?

The answer isn’t clear but Clara Jeffrey, editor of Mother Jones magazine, a nobody until yesterday, now has achieved a certain level of temporary fame.

This kind of story is a distraction from real news. It has a certain entertainment value, but really it’s something of a waste of time.

Still, unless we confront these loons, they win. So here’s the story.

Breitbart

Mother Jones editor-in-chief received a lot of pushback on social media for claiming that the “tomahawk” missiles fired at a Syrian air base last week were an example of cultural appropriation.

“That the missiles are called tomahawks must enrage a lot of Native Americans,” Clara Jeffery wrote on Twitter.

Jeffery received a flood of responses that criticized her statement and pointed out the history behind the name.

Jonah Goldberg of National Review said the decision to name the missiles was a “tribute” and not a “mockery” of Native Americans.

Donald Trump Jr. retweeted a response from author and Daily Wire editor-in-chief Ben Shapiro that poked fun at the response and offered a name for the missiles on behalf of his Jewish nationality.

“If Native Americans want to rename Tomahawk missiles, I am happy to offer to rename them Hebrew Hammers on behalf of the Jews,” Shapiro wrote on Twitter.

According to the Daily Mail, it is actually common practice in the U.S. military to name aircraft or machinery after Native American tribes.

Army officials typically name aircraft after Native American tribes that historians say are well-known for their martial prowess.

Army Material Command actually seeks approval from Native American tribes before deciding to name any aircraft after a Native American tribe, according to the Department of the Army.

Jeffery’s tweet comes after President Trump decided to attack a Syrian air base with 56 tomahawk missiles in response to a chemical attack reportedly launched by the Syrian regime that killed 85 civilians, including children.

“Dear Baby Boomers,”

I’m a baby boomer and I approve this message.

With a caveat.

Not all of us were left wing, hypocritical zealots. Just most of us.

Gavin McInnes goes after baby boomers in this video, calling us “retarded,” among other things.

Fred Reed on Social Justice Warriors

FRED REED.

Conservative’s favorite humorist Fred Reed makes the case for White Nationalism, segregation, separation–call it what you will.

He does so without criticizing any group. Rather he observes that differences among people naturally create conflicts.

Excerpt from Lew Rockwell

Social Justice Warriors and Bubonic Plague:Is There a Difference?

1) Liberals posit the equality of groups that are not equal, attribute the inevitable differences of outcome to discrimination, and try to eradicate them through regulation, affirmative action, and punishment of those noticing the differences. This doesn’t work, assuring a pretext for indignation that is non-depletable, like the liver of Prometheus.

Here we have the bedrock of American politics.

(2) Liberals believe that we should all love one another, and hate those who don’t. This puts them in the morally invincible position of being against hatred. It also obscures the observable fact that most of us, certainly to include liberals, dislike a great many people and that most groups detest a lot of other groups, or will if placed in contact with them. Distance is a prerequisite to love.

(3) Groups hate each other, firstly, the greater their proximity. Secondly, the more they differ from one another, and, thirdly, the more power one has over another or the greater the apparent superiority of one over the other. The result is a spectrum of hostility running from surliness to severed heads.

This explains anti-antisemitism. Jews do not assimilate: Bill O’Toole in America does not think of himself as Irish, but Rachel Cohen thinks of herself as Jewish. This is not a sin, which has nothing to do with it. Proximity is close to a maximum since Jews are widely mixed through the population. Jews rise to positions of power, completing the triad. They can’t win.

There are those who believe that Homo sapiens came about through the mating of a Neanderthal with a pit bull. While this has not been confirmed, it fits the evidence.

(4) This brings us to the curious notion that diversity is a strength, which it obviously is not. Diversity is, in fact, the cause of most of the world’s troubles. If you doubt that diversity is a great evil, consider relations between:

Tamils and Sinhalese in Sri Lanka; Tutsis and Hutus in Burundi; Protestants and Catholics in Ireland; Israelis and Arabs in Palestine; blacks, whites, and browns in the United States; Anglophones and Francophones in Canada; Sunnis and Shias everywhere; Chinese and Indonesians in Indonesia; Chinese and Malays in Malaysia; Muslims and Hindus in India; blacks and whites in South Africa; Jews and everybody else everywhere; Spaniards and Basques in Spain; Spaniards and Catalans; Turks and Kurds; to name a few.

(7) This, in turn, brings us to immigration, which amounts to the importation of people so they can hate each other.

Open borders are supported by vaguely warm-hearted appeals to those who think with their glands. There are probably 500 million Indians, as many Chinese, hundreds of millions of Africans, more Muslims, and several hundred million Latin Americans who would like to emigrate to the United States. The question for Social Justice Warriors is how many of these should be admitted–none, all, or a specific figure between?

Anyone who makes noises in favor of immigration should answer this question as otherwise, he will be engaging in mere moral posing. But to choose one number is to exclude another number. Not inclusive, that.