Breaking! Disgraced Ex-Congressman (((Anthony Wiener))) Pleads Guilty to Sexting Teen, Facing Prison Time

The optimism among the alt-right that Anthony Weiner was going to turn on Hillary Clinton and tell all has been dashed. If she goes to prison, it looks like it won’t be because he’s let the cat out of the bag.

Also dashed are hopes that the power elites pedophile sex scandal #pizzagate was going to be exposed by Weiner.

Weiner is facing approximately two years in prison for sexting a 15 year old North Carolina girl who enthusiastically joined him in exchanging sexually explicit photos and talk.

His apologies to the court during today’s proceeding are amusing Jew spew, the kind of thing that lawyers write as they seek lesser sentences for their guilty scumbag clients.

NBC News

Disgraced former Congressman Anthony Weiner wept openly in federal court Friday as he pleaded guilty to sexting a 15-year-old girl — and was emotional as he admitted to the judge: “I have a sickness, but I do not have an excuse.”

Weiner, 52, pleaded guilty in Federal District Court in lower Manhattan to transferring obscene material to a minor. Under a plea agreement, prosecutors asked he serve 21 to 27 months behind bars. He must also register as a sex offender.

He answered the judge’s questions before reading a prepared statement to the court, explaining how he was contacted by the girl online in January 2016 and knew she was 15.

“Through approximately March 2016, I engaged in obscene communications with this teenager, including sharing explicit images and encouraging her to engage in sexually explicit conduct, just as I had done and continued to do with adult women,” Weiner said. “I knew this was as morally wrong as it was unlawful.”

Amid sobs, he said that last fall he “came to grips for the first time with the depths of my sickness. I had hit bottom,” and chose to enter “intensive treatment.” He then apologized to the girl.

Continue reading

Scumbag (((Anthony Weiner))) to Face Child Pornography Charges?

WEINER’S 15 YEAR OLD SHIKSA.

Charge him. Throw the book at Anthony Weiner.

Then offer him a plea deal for the evidence that would send Bill and Hillary Clinton to prison for rest of their lives.

Drain the swamp, boys, while the draining is good.

Wall Street Journal

Federal prosecutors are weighing bringing child-pornography charges against former congressman Anthony Weiner over sexually explicit exchanges he allegedly had with a 15-year-old girl, according to people familiar with the matter.

Mr. Weiner, a New York Democrat, is being investigated by the U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which seized his electronic devices, including a laptop and a cellphone, as part of the probe.

Officials initiated the investigation last fall, after the Daily Mail in the U.K. reported that Mr. Weiner had exchanged sexually explicit messages and photos with the girl.

In recent weeks, according to some of the people familiar with the matter, attorneys for Mr. Weiner have had discussions with federal prosecutors in Manhattan in hopes of dissuading them from bringing charges, or at least from bringing the most serious one: production of child pornography, which carries a 15-year mandatory minimum prison sentence upon conviction.

These types of discussions can indicate both sides are trying to reach an agreement in which the defendant pleads guilty in exchange for a less-severe charge.

Mr. Weiner could face the production charge, some of the people familiar with the case say, because he allegedly solicited explicit images from the teenager. Prosecutors also are weighing other charges, including receipt of child pornography, for which conviction carries a five-year mandatory minimum, and possession of child pornography, which has no mandatory minimum.

Prosecutors could decide not to bring any charges.

It isn’t known what images prosecutors have found in the course of the investigation. Federal child pornography laws are broadly written, and lawyers who have defended people charged with child pornography say certain types of images could receive lighter treatment under the law, such as photos of nude minors who aren’t engaging in sexually explicit activity.

In determining child-pornography charges, prosecutors often take into account a range of contextual evidence, including whether a person specifically sought out a minor, whether the incident fits a pattern of similar behavior with minors and whether the person knew the individual was a minor.

Mr. Weiner has said he might have been the victim of a hoax. The Daily Mail reported in September that Mr. Weiner had provided the newspaper copies of two emails the teenager sent him that he said “raised questions about her claims.”

Mr. Weiner resigned from Congress in 2011, after the first reports that he had lewd exchanges with women online. He attempted a political resurrection with a New York City mayoral bid in 2013, but his career in politics was ultimately extinguished after a fresh round of sexually explicit messages he had exchanged with another woman emerged in the midst of his campaign.

The high-profile criminal probe into Mr. Weiner upended the final days of the 2016 presidential race. Less than two weeks before election day, FBI Director James Comey disclosed that FBI agents had discovered a laptop with emails that might be related to the probe of a private email server used by Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton while she was Secretary of State. The emails turned out to have been on a laptop used by Mr. Weiner and his now-estranged wife, Huma Abedin, a top aide to Mrs. Clinton.

Read the background on this story at the Daily Mail, in a story published last October.

Revenge porn: ‘Grow up’ and stop taking naked photos to avoid becoming a victim, say police

GROW UP, STUPID LADY.
revenge porn message

It’s been said several times on this site: If you don’t want your nude photos on the Internet, don’t take them.

Now the police in Australia are agreeing with me.

Excerpt from Telegraph

Australian police have told a revenge porn inquiry that the onus is on potential victims to stop taking naked selfies.

They said women and men should “grow up” and stop taking naked or explicit photos of themselves to curb the growing threat of the images being posted online, without consent.

“People just have to grow up in terms of what they’re taking and loading on to the computer because the risk is so high,” Australian federal police assistant commissioner Shane Connelly told the inquiry in Sydney on Thursday.

Connelly was then asked whether he was blaming the victims of revenge porn, but he argued that was not the case.

He said “wicked” people would always take advantage of the naive, and it was the same for revenge porn, cyber-crime or online child abuse.

“[They say] if you go out in the snow without clothes on you’ll catch a cold – if you go on to the computer without your clothes on, you’ll catch a virus,” he said.

“It’s a wicked analogy but it’s pretty realistic.”

According to the parliamentary inquiry, revenge porn is on the rise. Australian federal police have argued they cannot “arrest their way” out of the issue, and it is something which needs to be tackled through education.

As a result of the inquiry, the attorney general’s department will advise the Australian government on whether new laws are required.

Revenge porn is also a growing problem in the UK. In January, the Telegraph revealed at least 200 children, some as young as 11, have been victims in the past nine months.

Police deal with almost five cases a week, where intimate photographs of under-18s have been shared without the subject’s consent, often by a former partner, on social media networks including Facebook and Instagram.

The true scale of the problem, which was revealed for the first time in a series of Freedom of Information requests by The Telegraph, comes amid a growing trend among young people for ‘sexting’ – sending explicit images of themselves via smartphones.

The issue of revenge porn has become so acute in the UK that a new law, introduced in April 2015, made it illegal to disclose a ‘private sexual photograph or film’ without the consent of the person depicted in the content, and with the intent to cause them distress.

Since then, there have been 1,232 cases reported to police, including 191 against teenagers. The youngest victim was an 11-year-old and six 12-year-olds have also been targeted, figures disclosed by 35 forces show.

It is feared that the number of victims could be much higher as not all forces responded, and many do not record the victim’s ages.

The police have better things to do than track down and help prosecute men who post naked photos of their ex’s. As a practical matter, and as a legal matter, if you send me naked photos of yourself, I now own those pictures. If I have the legal right to erase them from my device, then I have the legal right to post them on the Internet. That’s the opinion of an amateur lawyer.

Speaking to women and advising them not to take naked pictures is called “victim blaming” by feminists. If you advise a four-year-old child not to stick his finger in a light socket because something bad will happen, are you “victim blaming?” Common sense advice in a variety of scenarios always leads to feminist whooping and hollering about “blame the victim”

The silly opinion below came from a longer article written by a woman and published at The Guardian:

Telling people to stop taking photos of themselves if they don’t want to have them bounced around the internet is the equivalent of telling women not to dress slutty if they don’t want to to get “victimised”. Or not to go to parks alone if they don’t want to get killed. Yes – both these gems of advice also came from policemen. Thanks to these great guys who are supposed to be protecting us.

I advise everyone not to go to parks alone at night without a weapon. So do the police. Women seem to want to defy the odds and get themselves raped and/or murdered in the name of equal rights.

Stupid is as stupid does.

stupid is as stupid does

Underage Female Who Took Nude Selfies Charged with Felony as Both Perp and Victim

NOT THE UNDERAGE TEEN IN THE STORY.
sexy teen selfies

I did a Google search for sexy teen selfies to find an image to use in this post and got back 18 million returns. Checking the images, most of them are totally naked. I finally settled on the image above, which is not illegal.

As for all those naked teen pics on Google image search, so much for the idea that it’s dirty old white men enticing teens into porn. Today’s teens, like the 16 year old in this story out of North Carolina make their own porn. A minor and a camera phone are a dangerous combination.

Fay Observer

After a 16-year-old Fayetteville girl made a sexually explicit nude photo of herself for her boyfriend last fall, the Cumberland County Sheriff’s Office concluded that she committed two felony sex crimes against herself and arrested her in February.

The girl was listed on a warrant as both the adult perpetrator and the minor victim of two counts of sexual exploitation of minor – second-degree exploitation for making her photo and third-degree exploitation for having her photo in her possession.

Hmmm. Self victimization. That’s a new legal doctrine to me. I guess if you inject yourself with heroin you could also be viewed as a criminal and a victim at the same time. Somehow, that line of thinking seems off.

A plea bargain saved the girl from serious legal consequences, I guess because she was viewed as the victim as well as the perp. Which is interesting because if an older white male had taken the same picture of her, his a** would have been thrown in prison for years and he would be a registered sex offender for life.

With the growing popularity of sexting among teens, two researchers said the courts would fill with defendants like this girl if the Sheriff’s Office were to arrest all the teens who make nude photos to share with their love interests.

Were such a standard to apply nationwide, “you’re talking about millions of kids being charged with child pornography,” said psychologist Jeff Temple of the University of Texas Medical Branch.

Temple said his research has found that 28 percent of teens use their cellphones to send naked photos of themselves to other teens. So does a 2014 study published by researchers at Drexel University in Pennsylvania.

Now, what about the boyfriend of the girl who took those naked pics of herself and sent them to him? His a** is between a rock and a hard place. Thus, proving there’s a hypocritical double standard that stinks to the high heavens.

The Fayetteville girl, Brianna Denson, was sexting with her boyfriend, Cormega Zyon Copening, the Sheriff’s Office said. The agency hit Copening with five sexual exploitation of a minor charges – four for making and possessing two sexually explicit pictures of himself and the last for possessing a copy of the picture that Denson made for him.

Copening, who was 16 at the time and is now 17, also faces possible prison time and the requirement to register as a sex offender if convicted. The charges have already forced him off the football team at Jack Britt High School. He had been the quarterback.

CORMEGA ZYON COPENING. MUH NIGGA BEEZ GETTING HIM FREEK ON AN ALL DAT SHIIIIIIT.
copening

This source claims the girl’s name is Brianna Benson, not Denson. No pictures of her are available as far as I can determine. It would be interesting to know her race.

The reaction of parents whose children attend the same school is interesting.

WRAL

“I would not be happy if my kids were doing that, but I didn’t know it would be illegal,” Mandy Kelly said.

Child psychiatrist Seth Tabb said parents need to educate themselves first on the laws, and then follow suit with their kids.

“Say to them there are laws you may not be aware of that you are violating,” Tabb said. “This could put you in trouble, this could follow you all of your life.”

Tabb said he urges parents to speak openly and protectively to their teens, at a time when emotions aren’t running high.

“This could hurt somebody else besides you,” Tabb said. “Do you want your name and this image or these issues coming up as the first thing somebody finds on a google search?”

Tabb said he also encourages parents to discern whether their kids feel pressure to sext or are doing it consensually, or whether there is a more malicious intent—like circulating the images as a form of cyberbullying.

Interesting that headshrinker Tabb does not bring up the morality issue. Teaching children morals rather than teaching them the fine points of the law may be a better strategy to keeping them out of trouble.

Also interesting is a poll on the WRAL link that shows that the public approves of teens sexting each other and sending sexually explicit pictures to each other.

I wonder if they would be so approving of the teens sending such pics to older men in the 40s, 50s, and older.

After all, older guys love naked teen bodies too. Why aren’t they invited to the party? Isn’t that illegal age discrimination?

The public is so screwed up having been brainwashed by the porn industry that they have no idea what the difference is between healthy and unhealthy sex.

The media encourages teens to sext each other. The end game for the New World Order is the legalization of pedophilia (along with bestiality, group marriage, and probably necrophilia.) When children become enslaved to their sexual appetites, encouraged to indulge by culture and society, they are that much easier to exploit and control by the globalists.

When your whole life centers on perversion, there’s little chance you’ll notice what’s going on in the world or even care. A hard d*ck or a wet p*ssy seek only satisfaction. Thinking with your genitals is nonthinking.