Hillary: White Women Who Voted Against Her Pressured by Brothers, Fathers


So much failure, so many explanations.

Daily Caller

Hillary Clinton has an explanation for why women — white women, in particular — voted against her last November: they caved in to pressure from their husbands, fathers, boyfriends and male bosses.

Clinton made the excuse during an interview with NPR’s Rachel Martin during a promotional tour of her book, “What Happened.”

In the interview, Clinton was asked why, given that she was the first female presidential candidate, she fared worse than expected among female voters.

In typical Clinton fashion, she deflected the blame, suggesting that women who voted against her were somehow manipulated by men in their lives. She also claimed that “sexism” from supporters of Bernie Sanders might have played a part in her poor showing among female voters.

“You yourself in the book acknowledge that a good number of young women didn’t vote for you, which is presumably not a sexist choice. They just weren’t inspired by your message,” NPR’s Martin said to Clinton.


What Happened? The long list of who Hillary Clinton blames

It looks like for a while there’s going to be at least one Hillary Clinton post per day. She’s on a wild and crazy streak, spouting out more and more nonsense.

America dodged a bullet. ABC = Anybody But Clinton.

In this long piece, Hillary admits that people don’t like her, but she also blames many factors for her 2016 loss, including WHITE RESENTMENT.

There’s so much that could be said about this evil creature, but let her speak in her own words.


The beauty of Hillary Clinton’s new book title, What Happened, is it can be interpreted in so many ways.

Perhaps it’s a definitive account of the 2016 presidential election. “Here’s what happened”.

Maybe it’s an exclamation, like someone reacting to an unexpectedly loud noise (or an electoral earthquake). “Yikes! What happened!?”

Then again, it could be a stern mom, who just walked in on the mess her children (the voters) made in the living room. “Whaaaaat happened …”

Or is she the dazed boxer, picking herself up off the canvas after getting knocked out by a surprise punch from her opponent.

“Wha-, wha-, what happened???”

It’s up to readers to decide for themselves, but in Mrs Clinton’s recent interviews and in her book, which was formally released on Tuesday, she offers plenty of explanations from which to choose.

Here’s a list of just some of the factors to blame for the fact that she’s hitting book stores across the country, while Donald Trump is redecorating the Oval Office.

James Comey
“If not for the dramatic intervention of the FBI director in the final days we would have won the White House.”

This isn’t the first time Mrs Clinton has said the former FBI director – who wrote a letter informing Congress that he had reopened the investigation into the handling of classified material on Mrs Clinton’s personal email server as secretary of state – is the main culprit behind her defeat.

In her book, Mrs Clinton calls the use of that server a “dumb mistake”, but the resulting scandal was “even dumber”. And in Mrs Clinton’s eyes, Mr Comey’s blame for the matter extends to his public announcement that he would not bring charges against Mrs Clinton, despite the fact that she had been “extremely careless” in her handling of classified material.

“I don’t know quite what audience he was playing to, other than maybe some right-wing commentators, right-wing members of Congress, whatever,” Mrs Clinton said of Mr Comey’s press conference in July 2016.

Continue reading

Feminist Reporter in a Snit Over Rush’s “Infobabe” Nickname

The articles at the New Republic make the reporting at Huffington Post look like the Daily Stormer in comparison. There’s more liberal whining and biased fake news than it’s possible to imagine.

One piece that caught my eye was written by a feminist reporter whining about Rush Limbaugh’s use of the term “infobabe.”

With all the serious issues in the world–North Korea, racial turmoil, the Middle East–the New Republic published a very ineffective hit piece on Rush.

I’ve condensed it to less than 500 words. It really seems like a pointless article. No one thinks Rush is cruel, vicious, or mean. The main thing the article proves is that feminists will go out of their way to complain about trivialities.

New Republic

New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd noted back in 1993 that Limbaugh “calls women who work for newspapers ‘reporterettes’ and women who work on television ‘info-babes.’”

Clearly, Limbaugh no longer limits his use of “infobabe” to female cable news personalities. There’s me, as well as Darlene Superville from the Associated Press, author and roving columnist Nicole Hemmer, Los Angeles Times columnist Meghan Daum, and Katie Couric, most recently of Yahoo! News. Limbaugh has used the term at least two dozen times since last year alone, according to Media Matters’ Julie Millican.

Limbaugh did not respond to multiple requests for comment for this story. If he had, he likely would’ve been very proud of himself, because he takes credit for inventing and popularizing the term. “Infobabe is sort of a patented comment now,” he said on his show in April. “I mean, the infobabes even like being called infobabes. They might publicly tell you they don’t, but they privately do.”

I have confirmed that infobabes do not privately like the name. “It’s sexist, of course,” said Camerota, who has been called an infobabe multiple times. Other infobabes agreed. “Coming from a guy of Limbaugh’s age and gender, ‘babe’ is meant to reduce you to the fact that you’re a woman,” said Hemmer, whom Limbaugh called “a Politico infobabe” after the outlet published an excerpt of her 2016 book, Messengers of the Right: Conservative Media and the Transformation of American Politics. “Maybe in a soft way, babe suggests an attractive woman. But it’s about reducing your work to your gender in this way that foregrounds the fact that you’re a woman in a field that is predominantly male.”

The word does even more than that. Whereas “babe” is a slang term for a woman, its literal definition is “infant” or “baby.” So Rush is not only reducing these journalists to their gender, but equating them with children. And there’s no question, given how Rush uses “infobabe,” that he intends to demean his targets.

One caller suggested he quit using the words “babe” and “infobabe” if he wanted to attract more female listeners. “But what if the fact that being a babe is the most notable thing about a particular liberal blogger?” Limbaugh responded. “If she’s a babe, she’s a babe.” The caller persisted, saying professional women might not find the term complimentary. Limbaugh hit back: “I would say they need to lighten up, for crying out loud! Why do I have to change who I am? Why can’t they just lighten up? Infobabe! Why can’t they laugh?”

Rush, my man, they don’t laugh because they want to be offended. They look for things to take offense at. It’s the new normal.


Atkin’s very weak reply to Rush is that she’s going to wear a T-shirt emblazened with “Infobabe.” Somehow she thinks that will hurt his feelings.

Go figure.


Antifa Flyer Cites Plan to “Purge” White Children from the Planet

Jeff Sessions is reportedly investigating White Nationalists. We must pressure everyone to investigate the Antifa too.

There’s a psy op here. The “Heebs” actually control the Antifa, although they also control the banks, movies, TV, higher ed, etc.,–every aspect of the lives of white people. I’m not sure why the Heebs are mentioned as masters of all whites. It may just be Kike bragging because I’m reasonably sure that a Kike wrote the flyer.

Seen at Microchip’s Twitter.

Feminists: Smart Homes are Sexist “Boy’s Toys”


Don’t tell the Nogs that smart homes are sexist. Since they’re designed by white men, smart homes will also be labeled racist. At which point some liberal federal judge will ban them as a violation of the 14th amendment.

Feminism has been in the toilet for decades now. It just keeps getting more ridiculous. Read this and weep.


Smart home technology has been dramatised and anticipated for years now. Like much technological foresight, however, smart home technology has struggled to keep up with its projections.

The Conversation undertook some analysis regarding who smart homes are really targeted at. They came to the blunt conclusion that smart homes are designed for men, and men alone.

Because the STEM industry is dominated by men, it makes sense that this is the case. Women continue to struggle with discrimination and under-representation in male-dominated industries. If men are envisioning the blueprint, the resulting product will naturally incline more towards their wants and needs.

This perhaps explains the awkward absence of domestic chores, often assumed to be ‘women’s work’, from smart house designs. While a smart fridge will text a shopping list to a dweller, it won’t do the shopping for her. A washing machine will send out an alert when its cycle is finished, but someone is still needed to operate that cycle.

Blueprinted smart houses will be connected to the internet. This means a person can communicate with their house online in a similar way to other humans or bots. Lights, television, security procedures and air conditioning, for example, will be operated via a smart device both inside and away from the home.

The outsourcing of domestic labour has a long history. The most prominent aspect of this is electricity. The electric refrigerator, along with appliances like irons and vacuum cleaners, was marketed to women as a means of saving time around the family home. The IoT refrigerator is marketed to men and connected to leisure time; the fridge can inform them how many cold beers are available.

It is not yet apparent whether the smart home will shift in design toward the house-keeping spectrum or remain a ‘boy’s toy’. More women ought to be included in the research and design process in order to create domestic technology which can be utilised for both genders.

Competition in the marketplace ensures that women will not be left out. The feminist argument that the free market leaves women barefoot and pregnant is the argument of ridiculous children.

Grow up and learn how the world works, you nasty, stupid feminists. I’ll bet those variable speed, choice of colors vibrators you freaks use on each other were designed by “sexist” men too.


Fired Employee James Damore Talking About Google’s Secret Anti-White, Anti-Male Diversity Programs

Terminated Google memo writer James Damore isn’t hiding out the way most people fired for being politically incorrect do.

He’s talking.

And what he says about (((Google))) just confirms that the company is a piece of sh*t politically correct, anti-white, anti-male operation.

He’s given at least two interviews to prominent alt-light (or right) figures, Jordan Peterson and Stefan Molyneux. Both interviews are embedded at the bottom of this post.

Daily Wire

Google deploys “potentially illegal” human resource management policies directed toward left-wing “diversity” objectives, said James Damore during a Wednesday-published interview with Jordan Peterson.

Damore is a former employee of Google, recently terminated following his questioning of the company’s “diversity” policies.

Damore spoke of “super-secret” and unrecorded “diversity summits” held by Google to push neo-Marxist politics on its employees. Partial transcript below.

PETERSON: Why did you do this? [write this memo]

DAMORE: About a month and a half ago, I went to one of our diversity summits — all of it unrecorded and super-secret — and they told me a lot of things that I thought were just not right.

Continue reading

Negress Professor Demands that White Men Quit Their Jobs


Negro logic combined with Marxist logic has invaded the formerly staid world of high-level mathematics, where axioms and proofs used to reign supreme.

Now, Nigga-babble has taken the spotlight, at least for a few moments.

A sour entitled Negress has written a piece called Get Out of the Way for a publication of the American Mathematics Society. Click on the link to read it.

It’s even more nonsensical than the characterization laid out in the source article for this post.

She also has a Liberated Mathematician website that explains why no one would want to hire her. Bizarre!

While calling for a feminist mathematics, a queer math, a people of color math, what happens to 2 + 2 = 4?

One more thing before you read this garbage. I try to do a little more research than the other guys. To go a little more in-depth. Sometimes I find something interesting. Sometimes I don’t.

I saw a clue that suggested that Piper is married. Guess what?

Piper Harron is married to a white male mathematician who also works at the university.

My God! A male oil driller!


Heat Street

A University of Hawaii math professor has urged every white man to quit their job or take a demotion and deemed those who disagree with her proposition as racist, sexist and transphobic.

Piper Harron, an assistant professor at the University of Hawaii who holds a PhD degree in mathematics from Princeton University, has penned an article for the American Mathematical Society (AMS) blog, calling on white men to “Get Out The Way”.

“Not to alarm you, but I probably want you to quit your job, or at least take a demotion,” Harron wrote, adding that “Statistically speaking, you are probably taking up room that should go to someone else.”

“If you are a white cis man (meaning you identify as male and you were assigned male at birth) you almost certainly should resign from your position of power,” the professor added.

Harron went on to suggest that if quitting is “too difficult”, white men should “at least get off your hiring committee your curriculum committee, and make sure you’re replaced by a woman of color or trans person.”

On the “About the Editors” page, Harron is described as someone who “tried really hard to play by the rules of society and academia, but she failed. Not only did she fail, but she was miserable and found that playing by the rules wouldn’t even keep her safe.

“She officially got her degree from Princeton University in January 2016, and is currently a Temporary Assistant Professor at the University of Hawaii at Manoa. She dedicates her work to everyone who dabbles in misery, trying to find their way in systems that don’t support them, and to anyone trying to tear it all down. ”

The Hawaii University professor continued her bizarre rant on the mathematics blog, claiming that while sexism is prevalent in society, it’s much easier to achieve “equality” at universities:

What can universities do? Well, that’s easier. Stop hiring white cismen (except as needed to get/retain people who are not white cis men) until the problem goes away. If you think this is a bad or un-serious idea, your sexism/racism/transphobia is showing.
Heat Street has approached the AMS, but did not hear back by the publication time.