O’Reilly Sues Critic for $5 Million Over “malicious” Facebook Post

MIKE PANTER, BILLO WANTS $5 MIL FROM HIM.

Anyone can file a lawsuit against anyone else at anytime. I recall I went to the federal courthouse in San Antonio, wrote a check for a $300 to $400 filing fee, filled in a form by hand, and I had a lawsuit going. That was without a lawyer at the time.

Most lawyers recommend that you leave the amount of damages open rather than specifying an amount. I was told that judges don’t like to be told how much you want early in a lawsuit.

Filing a lawsuit is easy. Winning is more difficult.

O’Reilly’s Facebook critic, Michael Panter, will need to come up with at least $200,000 to defend himself. There will probably be 60 to 100 pretrial motions that his lawyer will need to respond to. At $300 an hour the lawyer’s fees will add up.

If his critic told the truth about O’Reilly or if what he wrote is OPINION, then he should win. As a public figure O’Reilly can be criticized. In order for him to win his case, he will have to prove that Panter acted with malice.

You may recall that Sarah Palin sued the New York Times earlier this year for defamation. Her case was quickly dismissed.

Deadline

With more revelations about multimillion-dollar sexual harassment settlements becoming public, ex-Fox News Channel host Bill O’Reilly threw some muscle around in the courts today to the tune of $5 million.

“The relief includes, but is not limited to, reputational damages, monetary damages, special damages, punitive damages, costs, fees, injunctive relief, and such other relief as is just and proper, in an amount not less than $5 million,” said the two-page summons of notice filing (read it here) in New York Supreme Court against Michael Panter over a social media posting that didn’t exactly paint O’Reilly in the best of lights.

As a potential deal with Sinclair Broadcasting and return to the small screen looms for the former Factor frontman, the self-described “not a litigious guy” this morning followed up on his promise of yesterday to go after anyone who uttered what he considered untruths about him. A category into which former New Jersey state assemblymen Panter now falls, in O’Reilly’s view.

“This action seeks redress for Defendant Panter’s intentional, malicious, and bad faith actions in making defamatory and false statements in a publicly-available social media post,” says O’Reilly attorney Fredric Newman on Friday, designating Nassau County as the specific jurisdiction for the matter.

As damage spread from the news earlier this week of a $32 million sexual harassment settlement by O’Reilly just before Fox reupped his contract to $25 million annually, Panter went on Facebook claiming that an FNC-employed ex-girlfriend of his had once settled a harassment case with O’Reilly. He then asserted the NDA-bound ex was later contacted directly by O’Reilly looking for “anything you have” on another woman accusing the then-FNC host of sexual harassment.

“Plaintiff seeks damages for the public hatred, ridicule, disgrace, and permanent harm to his professional and personal reputations as a result of Defendant Panter’s publication of knowingly false defamatory statements about Plaintiff, which were made with actual malice, as well as Defendant Panter’s intentional infliction of emotional distress upon Plaintiff,” the summons adds without taking a breath.

While not actually a lawsuit — nothing like that has been filed, it seems — O’Reilly is clearly taking a page from ex-colleague Eric Bolling’s legal book and going after those he thinks are going after him.

Like the $50 million action this summer by the then-suspended and later pink-slipped Bolling against Huffington Post freelancer Yashar Ali over suggestive texts from the former Five co-host to female co-workers, this is not an actual lawsuit. O’Reilly, who was canned from FNC in April as more than $13 million in sexual harassment settlements by him and the company were revealed, may be trying to intimidate more than litigate.

Variety adds this information about Panter’s scribblings:

Panter is a one-time New Jersey politician who took to Facebook on Tuesday to write about how the one-time Fox News Channel star treated a former girlfriend of his after she had accused O’Reilly of sexual harassment. The summons says O’Reilly believes he has been defamed.

In the Facebook post, Panter offered details of how O’Reilly purportedly called his ex-girlfriend and solicited information from her about another woman who had also made harassment allegations against the former Fox News star.

Talent and Literary Agencies Drop O’Reilly in Wake of Sexual Harassment Accusations

In comments boards discussing Bill O, I’m seeing too many males acting like p*ssy-whipped feminists in their words of hatred directed at the former Fox News personality.

I will defend the right of every unmarried man of any age to flirt, woo, ask for a date, ask for sex, and otherwise pursue ANY female of his choice.

I will not defend sexual assault. No “grab ’em by the p*ssy” without a signal from the lady first. I said SIGNAL, not a signed legal document.

The libertarian in me leaves me in a quandary regarding voluntary agreements between men and women to exchange sex for pay raises, promotions, etc. Notice the qualifying word VOLUNTARY in the statement. The freedom to reach voluntary agreements without interference by the state is an important right that shouldn’t be impaired by political correctness.

My principles exclude married men from having these rights. Via marriage, a man voluntarily gives up certain rights, including the right to pursue women.

Sorry guys, but those are my principles.

The turd p*ssified males commenting on O’Reilly seem to think that NO MAN has a right to woo a woman. These running dogs of feminism are sex traitors, betraying natural human behavior in favor of feminist political correctness.

Some men seem to be happy that their masculinity is being stripped away via the demonization of Bill O.

Today he lost his literary agent, on top of losing his talent agent earlier.

Variety

In the wake of sexual harassment allegations, Bill O’Reilly has been dropped by his literary agency, WME. This news comes on the heels of the ending of his relationship with his talent agency, UTA, earlier this week.

In a statement to Variety, WME said, “We no longer represent Bill O’Reilly for future deals. It is our fiduciary responsibility to service the existing deals we have under contract, but we will not be working with him moving forward.”

O’Reilly is the author of seven books in his “Killing” series, including the most recent “Killing England: The Brutal Struggle for American Independence.”

The former Fox News anchor has recently come under renewed criticism after news broke that 21st Century Fox had renewed his contract right after paying a $32 million settlement.

He was fired by Fox News in April following a New York Times report that he had been involved in settlements of harassment and sexual harassment claims with five women totaling $13 million, dating back to 2002. On Saturday, the Times reported that O’Reilly personally reached a settlement in January with former Fox News legal analyst, Lis Wiehl, for $32 million, a fee far larger than previously disclosed settlements. In February, Fox News set a long-term contract with O’Reilly that included a huge salary boost, to $25 million a year from around $20 million under his previous deal.

Talent agency UTA had informed O’Reilly that it would not be renewing his contract when his deal expires at the end of 2017, according to a person familiar with the matter. “Bill has already lined up alternative representation,” said Mark Fabiani, a spokesman for O’Reilly.

Fabiani had no comment on the WME decision.

A lot of sexual interaction takes place via nonverbal communication by women. A gesture, a smile, a head toss, a look–all of these come into play. Women, sober women anyway, are not programmed to walk up to a man and say, “F*** me. Now.” Only in porn …

Anyway, the feminist rules for male-female interaction are intended to apply to whites only. Thus, they are anti-white as well as anti-male.

My final observation is that O’Reilly’s sex habits or behavior toward women have nothing to do with his ability to write books (which were ghostwritten anyway). I hope he finds another agent and writes a memoir telling his side of the sexual harassment story.

Pigging: Shameful New Dating Game Played by Men on Women

SOPHIE STEVENSON. ALLEGED VICTIM OF CRUEL PRANK.

A vile new dating game played by men upon women is in the news today.

We need to start by acknowledging that “pigging” may not really exist. The stories told by alleged victims may be stories told by crazy women. Or, if pigging exists, then it may not be common.

However, if we believe that pigging is real, then let’s get this straight: Men who practice pigging are enemies of our people.

Our people need to have men and women get together to form families and have babies. Anything that causes distrust between the sexes is disgraceful.

So what is pigging? Read on for an explanation.

Excerpt from The Telegraph

It is one thing being rejected or ignored by your holiday romance. It is another thing entirely to fly out to see him in Amsterdam, after weeks of messaging, only to be stood up in the airport with nothing but a text saying the entire affair was a cruel joke and calling you a ‘fat ugly pig.’

But this horrific scenario is exactly what 24-year-old Sophie Stevenson says happened to her after she met Dutchman Jesse Mateman, 21, on holiday in Barcelona. She claims the pair slept together, had a “proper romance” and then spoke regularly when she was back home in Stoke. A month later Mateman convinced her to fly out to visit him in Amsterdam for the weekend.

“We were talking up until I got on the plane,” Stevenson told the Mail. “But when I arrived, he wasn’t there to pick me up. I called him a bunch of times, and he didn’t answer. I waited at the airport for two hours and I hadn’t heard anything, I was really starting to panic about being abandoned.”

Six hours later, she says he messaged her saying ‘you were pigged, it was all a joke.’

‘Pulling a pig’ is a vile game that sees a man try to woo a woman they deem ‘fat and ugly’, solely because he and his deplorable friends think it is ‘funny’.

According to Urban Dictionary, the “winner” is the guy who attracts the “ugliest” one, and the awful phenomenon seems to have been around since 2014, when Big Brother contestant Josie Cunningham tried to launch a dating site called ‘Pull the Pig’, aimed at ‘average-looking women’ (seemingly, it is currently inactive).

It’s part of a wider culture that increasingly relies on trickery, mocking and nastiness in dating. Recent terms like ‘benching’ refer to men keeping a woman they don’t feel passionately about ‘on the sidelines’ – just in case. While ‘kittenfishing’ and ‘catfishing’ mean lying on your social media profile to trick someone into dating you.

A particularly appalling example is ‘chubby chasing’ – where men seek larger women ‘as a laugh’ to impress/shock/win a bet. It is heartless, sickening and, as Stevenson simply said, ‘cruel.’

Mateman has denied the claims, after facing a backlash, insisting he never had a holiday romance with Stevenson and that any texts between them are invented. “That is just fantasist rubbish and it is ruining my life,” he said.

Western civilization is in an existential crisis, and if this report is true, then our young males are foolishly making it worse. You really have to ask if we’ve raised a generation of sociopaths.

Any guys who pull this stuff on women should not only be shunned by women, but also by other men. They make it harder for decent guys to find women to date.

Female Reporter Insulted by Negro Football Player Cam Newton Apologizes for “Nigger” Tweets

JOURDAN RODRIGUE. TWEETED “NIGGER” A FEW YEARS AGO.

For the last few days a gentleman of color who is a big name in American football has been on the hot seat for gently expressing the opinion that it seems odd to him to have women sports reporters.

Feminists, the press, and others blew this up into a big deal. In reality, why should anyone care about his personal opinion since he doesn’t control which sports reporters cover him.

The black fellow, $35 million a year quarterback Cam Newton of the Carolina Panthers, groveled an apology to women. He lost one lucrative endorsement deal and was in danger of losing more.

CAM NEWTON.

Now it’s been discovered by the ever vigilant troublemakers who stick their noses into everybody’s business that the reporter, Jourdan Rodrigue (Hispanic?) has a past.

This whole episode is a great example of a distraction intended to make us forget that there are really important issues that we should be grappling with.

Charlotte Observer

Jourdan Rodrigue, a Charlotte Observer reporter who covers the NFL’s Carolina Panthers, apologized Thursday for tweets that she sent in 2012 and 2013.

“I apologize for the offensive tweets from my Twitter account 4/5 years ago,” Rodrigue said in a Twitter statement. “There is no excuse for these tweets and the sentiment behind them. I am deeply sorry and apologize.”

In Rodrigue’s old tweets, which she made while in college, she made light of racist remarks made by others and retweeted a racial slur.

In December 2012, she tweeted: “My dad is being super racist as we pass through Navajo land.”

And in August 2013, she tweeted: “He’s the best. Racist jokes the whole drive home.”

It’s nice when a girl appreciates her father and his racism.

In May 2013, Jourdan quoted a Twitter parody account: “The earth moves at 450+ mph that’s 10 times triller than NASCAR Dale Earnhart’s (sic) a b—- n—-”

Observer Editor Sherry Chisenhall said, “The Twitter posts are regrettable and we wish they hadn’t happened. We don’t condone the posts or the messages they convey. We believe Jourdan is deeply sincere in her apology and regret about those tweets.”

Rodrigue, 25, entered the national spotlight Wednesday, after a press conference in which she asked Panthers quarterback Cam Newton a question about a receiver. Newton responded by saying “it’s funny to hear a female talk about (wide receiver) routes.”

And there you have it, ladies and gentlemen.

Much ado about nothing.

Can’t a black male have an opinion? Can’t a white female enjoy racist jokes?

Not with the busybodies who take great delight in embarrassing people and ruining their lives.

This busybody society is what you get snitching is exalted as a positive value. I’m with the guys in prison. Give snitches the shiv.

As to this kerfuffle, it’s the least important story that I can imagine. Watching and following football and other sports is the least productive activity imaginable.

Ex-Bourbon Street Stripper Offends by Selling “Erotic Art” in Jackson Square

EDEN GASS.

The last name GASS is listed as South German, Swiss, and Askanazi Jewish. Since Eden Gass is acting like a Jew and since she attended one of the most heavily Jewish universities in America, I assume that she’s Jewish. She also exhibits Jewish chutzpah in trying to sell her degenerate “art” to stupid tourists who are out for cheap thrills in New Orleans. See below.

NOLA

When perusing the paintings on the Jackson Square fence, you might expect to find dreamy renderings of St. Louis Cathedral, expressive portraits of jazz musicians, and folky abstractions. You probably wouldn’t expect to find symbolic paintings of genitalia with provocative feminist themes. But that’s just what artist Eden Gass offers to passing tourists every weekend.

Imagine subversive versions of the sort of things seen in so-called men’s magazines. Silhouettes of romantically inclined animals, Freudian fruit, etcetera. You’ll have to imagine, because the majority of Gass’ art isn’t going to be seen on a family friendly website or in the newspaper.

Gass said that passersby seem to be remarkably open to it.

“Actually, tourists aren’t surprised to see it. They’re like, ‘Only in New Orleans,’ you know,” Gass said.

Dressed in high heels, tights, glittery sunglasses, and scarlet lipstick, Gass calls out to potential customers like a French Quarter nightclub barker. “Erotic feminist art,” she shouts. “Step right up.”

Visitors may be cool when confronted with her art, but Gass said, some of her fellow Jackson Square artists have been a bit chagrined. Amidst her colorful paintings, Gass displays the acrimonious, anonymous notes she’s received from detractors.

It’s not the anatomical content of her art that bothers her fellow artists, she said. After all, paintings of nudes have been sold on the square for decades.

The problem seems to be that some Square artists fear her political stridence will scare away business.

“It threatens their status quo,” she said. “There’s young and old (artists) up in arms about it,” she said.

Gass, 42, was schooled in conceptual art at Tulane University in the early 1990s. Back then, she said, she began incorporating feminist symbolism in her art as a sort of antidote to her night job.

“In college I made work about the body and sex in response to being a stripper on Bourbon Street,” she said.

When she first began selling art at Jackson Square four years ago, she concentrated on crowd-pleasing cityscapes. Then she had a serious medical scare.

“The current catalyst for this body of work, pun intended, was my 2013 diagnosis with breast cancer,” she said. “I did this little painting of breasts, including a stylized version of the breast with a mastectomy scar. I brought it out here with my tourist art and it sold immediately.”

Soon enough Gass replaced her visitor-targeted landscapes entirely with sexually frank pop paintings. Meanwhile, she said, she faces a second mastectomy because of her genetic proclivity for that type of cancer.

Gass said that her feminist point of view predated the 2016 presidential election. But the political aspect of her work became even more acute with the revelation of now-President Donald Trump’s statement about the uninvited fondling of women. Gass uses it as a selling point, laughingly encouraging passersby to buy her paintings as a form of protest.

Just think, guys. If you were a tourist in New Orleans in the 90s you might have slipped a dollar into Eden Gass’s g-string.

There are probably a lot of guys who would want their dollar back after reading this article.

Link to Eden Gass Facebook

White Males Sweep 9 of 9 Hard Science Nobel Prizes

CLICK ON THE IMAGE TO ENLARGE FOR ENHANCED READABILITY.

And liberals are screaming racism and sexism!

Read Steve Sailer’s coverage at Unz.

Interestingly, I believe (without researching the winners) that several of them are actually Jews, who are a mixed race people, not European in origin.

Hillary Clinton Says that Women Trump Supporters are “publicly disrespecting themselves”

Bitter, clueless, spiteful Hillary Clinton has found dozens of people to blame for her loss to Donald Trump. Here she goes after women. It’s like she expected to get the women’s vote without earning it.

Excerpt from the Daily Mail

Hillary Clinton said that women who support President Donald Trump are ‘publicly disrespecting themselves’ and that he is doing ‘worse than I thought’.

In an interview on Saturday on MSNBC’s AM Joy, the 2016 presidential hopeful said she was surprised by women who supported Trump given his past contentious remarks – including the ‘grab them by the p****’ controversy.

‘When I see women doing that, I think: “Why are they publicly disrespecting themselves?”,’ Clinton told host Joy Reid.

‘”Why are they opening the door to have someone say that about them in their workplace? In a community setting? Do they not see the connection there?'”

Clinton gave the response when Reid asked her about women at Trump rallies who wore profane T-shirts ‘that used the b-word, the c-word about you.’

‘And I think that’s one of the problems with sexism,’ Clinton continued.

‘We had such a public and still an ongoing movement to expand civil rights. Again, I’m proud of the progress, but we still have a lot of problems we have to confront.’

“… problems we have to confront.” Yes, like too many Christian women, too many heterosexual women, too many white women, too many women who want children, too many women opposed to abortion, and so forth.

To liberals like Hillary (or should I say Marxists like Hillary), they always need to find new problems that only big government can “solve.”

What a tiresome person she is.

She also said it was ‘troubling’ to hear people chanting ‘Lock her up’ in reference to jailing her over deleted emails.
‘It was deeply troubling on several levels,’ Clinton said.

‘And I try to unpack this, because first of all it’s not pleasant to be called names and to be subjected to the kind of insults that come across the online media all the time, which we see when women express an opinion.’

Despite the campaign being over, the chants of ‘Lock her up’ have not ended at Trump events. The crowd chanted the phrase on Friday during Trump’s speech at a rally for Alabama Senate candidate Luther Strange.

Trump responded to the crowd, saying they should talk to Attorney General Jeff Sessions about that.

This comment at the Daily Mail made me laugh: “Heaven does not want Hillary and the Devil is afraid she’ll take over.”