What Does Ben Shapiro Know that We Don’t?

Ben Shapiro is a conservative Jewish author and the editor-in-chief of the Daily Wire news website.

And for that matter, what does Trump’s friend Sean Hannity know that we don’t?

Seth Rich? Hillary Clinton? Obama? Pizzagate? 9/11 truth? Kennedy assassination truth? UFO truth? Charlottesville truth? North Korea?

Trump Jr. Explains Himself to Hannity: ‘In retrospect, I probably would have done things a little differently’

To take a so-called bombshell and distill it down to a nutshell, a Russian woman lawyer working for her clients got word to Donald Trump Jr. that she had incriminating evidence against Hillary Clinton that she would like to discuss. She had no such information. Her real purpose was to lobby Trum about a law revolving around the adoption of Russian children.

Trump Jr. met with her for 20 minutes. End of story. There were no further meetings or other contacts. The woman says she has no connection to the Russian government.

Liberals are calling Jr’s meeting collusion with a foreign power to steal an election and even treason.

Here’s what he said a few hours ago during a TV interview with Sean Hannity on Fox News.

Marketwatch

Donald Trump Jr. admitted to Fox News host Sean Hannity on Tuesday night that he may have mishandled a June 2016 meeting with a Russian attorney who offered damaging information about Hillary Clinton.

“In retrospect, I probably would have done things a little differently,” Trump Jr. said in the interview, which aired Tuesday night.

Trump Jr. told Hannity that the meeting was for opposition research for his father’s presidential campaign, but turned out to be nothing. “Maybe they had something, you know, maybe concrete evidence to all the stories I’d been hearing about … so I think I wanted to hear it out. But really it went nowhere.”

“It was literally just a wasted 20 minutes, which was a shame,” Trump Jr. said.

Trump Jr. also said he did not tell his father about the meeting, which was also attended by his brother-in-law Jared Kushner and campaign manager Paul Manafort: “It was just a nothing. There was nothing to tell.”

Earlier Tuesday, Trump Jr. released a series of emails discussing his plans to meet a Russian government attorney to discuss potentially damaging information related to Clinton.

“If it’s what you say, I love it,” Trump Jr. wrote in an email.

When asked about how credible the emailed offer appeared, Trump Jr. told Hannity: “I didn’t know if there was any credibility, I didn’t know if there was anything behind it, I can’t vouch for the information. Someone sent me an email. I can’t help what someone sends me. I read it, I responded accordingly.”

Trump Jr. told Hannity that he didn’t think he did anything wrong, and was willing to testify about his actions, if asked. That appears likely, after Reuters reported Tuesday that the Senate Intelligence Committee plans to seek his testimony.

To learn more about the key players in this so-called scandal, then scroll down the homepage from this post and read three earlier posts tonight on the subject of this uninteresting 20 minute meeting with a self-promoting lawyer.

Flashback: Paul Ryan Rules Out Cuts to Muslim Immigration–“That’s not who we are.”

REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMAN PAUL RYAN. POLITICAL CORRECTNESS IS HIS HIGHEST VALUE.

Paul “Open Borders” Ryan went on the record with Sean Hannity, as reported in this excerpt from a November 19, 2015 story.

Breitbart

House Speaker Paul Ryan is ruling out making any cuts to Muslim immigration.

In an interview with Sean Hannity on Fox News, Ryan declared that considering an applicant’s religion would not be “appropriate” and would be fundamentally un-American— insisting “that’s not who we are.”

In his questioning of Ryan, Hannity cited populist thought leader Jeff Sessions, who chairs the Senate Immigration Subcommittee and whose office has put out a series of analyses in recent months detailing the enormous scope of immigration into the United States in general, as well as the vast scope Muslim immigration in particular.

Since 9/11, the U.S. has accepted more than 2 million immigrants, refugees and asylees from predominantly Muslim nations. Sessions has repeatedly called on Congress to reduce the number of green cards issued, including in an op-ed last week one day prior to the Paris attack.

“Eighty-three percent of voters want to see projected immigration growth reduced — which means Congress must take up and pass a bill to reduce the number of visas handed out each year,” Sessions wrote. “Congress should immediately begin to move popular immigration reforms that would be backed by overwhelming majorities of voters, including… blocking the president from using federal funds to unilaterally expand the costly refugee resettlement program.”

In his question, Hannity asked Ryan point blank about some of Sessions’ recent analysis. Hannity said:

We have resettled 1.5 million Muslim migrants in the United States. Senator Sessions had put out a piece where all these people that we took in to the country then come here and then get involved in terror activity. I put it up on my website, I urge you to take a look at it. And we take in 100,000 Muslim immigrants into the United States every year. Do we have to think about somebody who grows up under Sharia— believes that women can’t drive, can’t be seen in public without a male relative, four eyewitnesses for rape— do we have a clash of cultures we’ve got to consider? How do we know if they want to assimilate? How do we know if they want to bring terror into the United States? How will we ascertain that?

Ryan replied:

Well, first of all, I don’t think a religious test is appropriate. That’s not who we are. We believe in the first amendment of religious freedom. And I don’t think it’s the appropriate test because anybody can come under the guise of something else. It’s not hard for a person to claim that they are something that they’re not— like a Christian or something like that to get into the country. That is why we are calling for a security test. I think the test that maters is a security test because anybody can try and infiltrate this country by posing as something that they are not, so I don’t think that’s the proper test. I think a security test is the proper test.

Ryan’s view stands opposed to that of his Congressional colleagues Sen. Rand Paul, Reps. Cynthia Lummis, Brian Babin, Dave Brat, Randy Weber and Steve King, who—as Breitbart News recently reported—have all expressed support for a reduction or suspension of visa issuances to Muslim countries with jihadist movements.

Fox News’ Hannity Calls for Boycott of Liberal Advertisers on FGGT Rachel Maddow’s Show

AMERICANS ARE UNITING TO WIPE THE SMILE OFF HER MUG.

Faggot (FGGT) Rachel Maddow spews vile crap night after night on MSNBC. Now it’s her turn to taste the bitter fruit of her poisonous fake news.

Salon

Fox News host Sean Hannity is looking to generate support on Twitter for a campaign to oust MSNBC host Rachel Maddow by putting pressure on her advertisers.

Hannity’s move is a retaliatory response to media news site Media Matters and others who have called for a boycott of Hannity and pressured advertisers to pull out of his show. This is a reversal for Hannity, who has previously been against media boycotts, even of figures — such as Stephen Colbert — who come from opposing political views.

The movement to boycott Maddow’s show was initiated by conservative pundits Brian Maloney and Melanie Morgan, who created a “StopTheScalpings” Twitter account and accompanying hashtag to “push back against the attempt to silence those who dare to ask tough questions and pursue the truth,” according to an article on their site Media Equalizer. The Media Equalizer article, written by Morgan, claimed that the #StopTheScalpings campaign is dedicated to “Working Together, Against the Suppression of the First Amendment by the Left.”

Hannity retweeted tweets from the Stop the Scalpings Twitter more than a dozen times on Tuesday.

Here are the Rachel Maddow show advertisers from Media Equalizers. Contact info at the source:

AARP
APPLE
BP
CIALIS​ -​ELI LILLY
CISCO SYSTEMS
FREECREDITREPORTDOTCOM—- IS PART OF EXPERIAN
JEEP
PROGRESSIV​E​ INS​URANCE​
RESIDENCE INN
VELVEETA (KRAFT)

Newest Developments in Seth Rich Murder Mystery

The final item in this post is a news.com.au article on the Seth Rich murder case, hot off the presses. It offers a quick 5 minute summary of what we know tonight. Videos, Tweets, and links augment that article.

Stefan Molyneaux analyzes the truth about the murder of Seth Rich. This video starts at the beginning and then moves up to the current moment. It’s a good place to start if you’re not up to speed on the case.

Styxenhammer666 shows the common sense of the Rich-Wikileaks connection and the involvement of the Clinton assassination team.

Internet entrepreneur Kim Dotcom says that Seth was the Wikileaks source of the damning Podesta emails.

He has a score to settle with Democrats:

I heard Sean Hannity talking about the Seth Rich murder on his radio show on Friday. He’s a big name and he’s the first big name involved in this mess.

Body language analysis suggests nefarious lies by Rich family and lawyer:

Various social media accounts allegedly owned by Seth Rich have been discovered.

Claim: Seth Rich’s Reddit account was recently edited by an unknown party: Link: Someone just edited Seth Rich’s Reddit Posts

A Zerohedge article implies that the DNC (Hillary, et. al.) had Seth murdered.

The following summary of the week’s developments was just published an hour ago by news.com.au.

news.com.au

AN INTERNET conspiracy theory over the murder of a young former Democratic National Convention staffer in the US has once again reached fever pitch.

Seth Rich was shot in the back and killed walking home in an up-market Washington neighbourhood in July last year.

The death has largely gone unexplained, with Washington police suggesting it was the result of a botched robbery. But in the aftermath of the killing, conspiracy theorists claimed the 27-year-old staffer was responsible for leaking a trove of 20,000 emails stolen from the DNC servers to WikiLeaks.

The stolen materials contained explosive details of collusion between the Hillary Clinton camp and the DNC to undermine the Bernie Sanders campaign in the lead-up to the 2016 US presidential election.

This week, both Fox News and a Fox affiliate in Washington, WTTG-TV, published and aired reports which cited information attributed to a private investigator named Rod Wheeler, who claimed he had uncovered evidence showing Mr Rich had been in contact with WikiLeaks before his death.

WikiLeaks — which is now seen by many US Democrats as a vehicle for Russian intelligence — retweeted stories containing the latest claims, which many interpreted as confirmation. WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange last year appeared to suggest Mr Rich was the leaker.

US authorities have accused Russian operatives of being the source of the leaks.

The Fox News story was also shared by the Russian Embassy in the UK on Twitter, receiving thousands of shares. But the report has since been proven to be inaccurate. Mr Wheeler said he had no information to that effect, and an FBI spokesman told the media that, contrary to the report, it had not conducted a forensic analysis of Mr Rich’s laptop that showed he had been in contact WikiLeaks.

A spokesman for the Rich Family, Brad Bauman, lashed out at those who continue to promote the story, which includes prominent Fox News anchor Sean Hannity.

“Anyone who continues to push this fake news story after it was so thoroughly debunked is proving to the world they have a transparent political agenda or are a sociopath,” he told CNN. “It either case, they should be taken off the air because they are either blind to the damage they are doing to a murder victims family or don’t care, showing a profound lack of judgment and common decency.”

On Sunday, speculation that the young DNC staffer was involved in the leaks was promoted by internet millionaire and the embattled founder of Megaupload, Kim Dotcom. Mr Dotcom tweeted that Mr Rich was the leaker and that he himself was also involved, promising to issue a statement after meeting with his lawyers this week.

Things got weirder still after internet sleuths uncovered what appeared to be Mr Rich’s social media accounts, including his Reddit username, “MeGrimlock4” and Twitter handle, “@panda4progress”.
His online persona revealed Mr Rich was a huge supporter of Sanders, which conspiracy theorists hold up as evidence of his motive to leak the e-mails which showed the DNC colluded to prevent Sanders from gaining the party nomination.

In a strange development, users discovered a tweet by former DNC director of data science Andrew Therriault, which appeared to posthumously mock Mr Rich, referring to him as an “embarrassment”.

On 27 April, quoting a tweet which read, “TIL: A group of Pandas is called an ‘Embarrassment’ #pandafacts”, Mr Therriault tweeted: “cc: @panda4progress”. The tweet has since been deleted.

Not long after, Reddit appeared to alter posts made by Mr Rich — a big no-no from the perspective of the site’s users — to remove a comment in which he shared his e-mail address, linking him to the account.

Reddit has a strict policy against sharing personal information, but a previous case in which Reddit chief executive Steve Huffman manually altered user’s comments drew ire from users and forced a public apology.

At the time, even former CEO Ellen Pao weighed in, saying she “would have immediately fired anyone” who did what Mr Huffman did. News.com.au contacted Reddit to ask about the alleged changes made to Mr Rich’s comment history.

Meanwhile, The Washington Post has published multiple reports this weekend describing claims of a cover-up over the murder of Seth Rich as fake news.

“The re-emergence of the conspiracy theory this week, which did not lack for real news, revealed plenty about the fake news ecosystem … in the Trump era,” the paper wrote. “It also happened to cause untold pain for the Rich family, which has sent a cease-and-desist letter to the so-called private investigator who led this dive back into the fever swamp.”

If I run across any more pertinent information, I’ll post it in a comment on this piece tonight.

Fox’s Trump Supporter Sean Hannity Accused of Sexual Harassment by Bleached Blonde Jew

Muh Jew lady has a history of being a fake conservative. Hannity should weather the storm that is being fired up by the liberal media, but in reality he, like O’Reilly, no longer fits the Fox agenda.

Will Hannity, a neocon Zionist who always supports Israel understand now the depths of Jewish treachery? No, of course not. But he’s a brother under attack by a lying Jewish fake conservative (focused on exterminating Muslims), so there’s no reason for us to throw him under the bus and every reason to back him.

Huffington Post

Sean Hannity is the latest Fox News star to be accused of sexual harassment.

In an interview with the Pat Campbell Show on Friday, former Fox News contributor Debbie Schlussel claimed that Hannity had invited her to his hotel room — twice — when they appeared together for one of his programs. But when she rebuffed him, Schlussel said that she was never asked back on the show.

Schlussel claimed the “awkward” incident began when Hannity invited her to a store where he was signing books. While there, she said Hannity asked her: “Why don’t you come back with me to my hotel?” Schlussel said she responded: “No, I have to get ready for the show.”

Schlussel said Hannity pressed her again to come to his hotel room after the show taping, which did not go well. She refused.

“I wasn’t booked on his show again, and he called me and yelled at me,” Schlussel said. “It was made clear to me that I didn’t go back to his hotel with him after. I got a very weird feeling about the whole thing, and I kind of knew I wouldn’t be back on his show.”

DEBBIE SCHLUSSEL. SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE.

She added: “This kind of stuff is all over the place at Fox News and anything that has to do with Sean Hannity.”

Her comments were aired just days after Bill O’Reilly’s ouster by Fox News in the wake of revelations that he and the company had paid out some $13 million to women who accused him of sexual harassment.

Fox News provided a statement to The Huffington Post from Hannity who said that Schlussel’s claims were “100 percent false and a complete fabrication.” He called her a “serial harasser who has been lying about me for well over a decade,” and threatened to sue her using a “team of some of the finest and toughest lawyers in the country.”

Hannity also characterized Schlussel’s comments as part of a “coordinated effort afoot to now silence those with conservative views.”

Schlussel, however, is a conservative. One sign of her politics was her repeated — and false — claim beginning in 2006 that President Barack Obama was a Muslim, insisting: “Once a Muslim, always a Muslim.”

But Schlussel has also clashed with Hannity, whom she referred to as “Vannity.” In 2007, she accused him of plagiarizing one of her columns. Three years later, she said the Freedom Alliance, a charity linked to Hannity, was involved in questionable practices, which the charity vehemently denied.

“This is not the first time Debbie Schlussel has lied about Sean Hannity,” Fox News stated. A point-by-point refutation of Schlussel’s attacks on the charity was also included.

Fox’s track record on sexual harassment, on the other hand, is abysmal. Before the most recent controversy over O’Reilly, several women had accused former Fox News chairman Roger Ailes of sexual harassment, which ultimately resulted in millions of dollars in payoffs. Former Fox News host Alisyn Camerota just revealed on Sunday that Ailes made inappropriate sexual comments to her and told her she’d have to meet him in a hotel if she wanted more opportunities at the network.

Ailes was eventually forced out of the company with a $40 million golden parachute. O’Reilly received a $25 million settlement as part of his deal to leave.

Over the weekend, Hannity posted a Twitter rant after he was named by The New York Times as one of President Donald Trump’s private advisers. He called the story “total fake news speculation,” then wondered if the Times had found out whom he talks to because perhaps he’s being “surveilled and unmasked by the NSA.”

Trump Tweet Said to Watch Judge Janine Who Then Said that Paul Ryan Needs to Step Down as Speaker of the House

Paul Ryan is garbage. An honorable man would step down as Speaker of the House. Judge Janine explains why.

news.com.au

PRESIDENT Donald Trump tweeted for his followers to watch a Fox News show. Its presenter called for a top Republican official to be sacked. Is this execution via Trump tweet?

President Trump had placed his faith in Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan to build a workable replacement for ‘Obamacare’, the national health insurance plan that has been in Republican sights since its inception.

He had just one job to do.

And, as far as the president was concerned, it was a done deal.

The Trump-branded proposal, however, fell dead at the doors of Congress.

Despite having a clear majority, House Republican leaders failed to win enough support from their own members for the replacement legislation to even be put to a vote.

“He had been told that everything was under control, the leadership could deliver, he didn’t have to pay too much attention, come in at the very end and close the deal. And it got to be a total mess,” high profile Republican powerbroker Newt Gingrich told Sean Hannity on Fox News yesterday.

“I can guarantee you that if this had been one of his hotels, one of his buildings, one of his golf courses, there’d be a lot of personnel changes tonight. And I think what you’re gonna see is that he’s gonna rethink how he’s going to approach the Congress based on this outcome. Because it was so totally, utterly unacceptable.”

President Trump asked us to watch. Heh, heh. The master troll strikes again.