Harvey Weinstein’s Army of Spies Included ex-Mossad Agents to Get Dirt on Accusers: Report

Oy vey!

What’s a poor persecuted Jew to do when the goyim get on to his sexual degeneracy!

Journalists have been digging around into Harvey’s affairs. What is revealed is how rich, powerful Jews operate. In a nutshell, they have no decency about them.

The Guardian

Harvey Weinstein allegedly hired an “army of spies”, including former Mossad agents, in an attempt to stop accusers from going public with sexual misconduct claims against him, according to a report in the New Yorker.

Among the private security agencies hired by Weinstein starting around autumn 2016, the magazine claims, was Black Cube, which is largely run by former officers of Israeli intelligence agencies, including Mossad. Another was corporate intelligence giant Kroll.

The report, published on 6 November, alleges that two Black Cube investigators met with actor Rose McGowan, who later publicly accused Weinstein of sexual rape, to obtain information.

Weinstein “unequivocally denies” all claims of non-consensual sex, a spokesperson for the producer says.

The New Yorker also claims that one of the investigators secretly recorded at least four meetings with McGowan while pretending to be a women’s rights advocates, citing dozens of pages of documents and seven people directly involved in Weinstein’s efforts.

The investigator reportedly used a different fake identity to meet a New York magazine journalist who was investigating allegations made against Weinstein. She also allegedly attempted to broker a meeting with Ronan Farrow, the New Yorker journalist who reported 13 claims of abuse made against Weinstein last month, and also wrote the 6 November investigation.

Weinstein and the private investigators also used journalists to extract details from women who were making claims against the film producer, according to the magazine.

During his yearlong effort, Weinstein and his team are accused of collecting information on dozens of people, compiling psychological profiles with their personal or sexual histories in order to contradict, discredit or intimidate his targets.

The New Yorker reports that Weinstein sought the assistance of ex-employees from his movie enterprises to help collect names and place calls. Investigations also allegedly sometimes went through Weinstein’s lawyers. Among them, the New Yorker claims, was David Boies, who represented Al Gore in his 2000 presidential election dispute with George W Bush.

The New Yorker claims Boies had signed a contract demanding that Black Cube seek to uncover information to stop the publication of a New York Times story about Weinstein’s sexual abuse when his firm was also representing the Times in a libel case. Boies told the magazine “it was a mistake” to have been involved with the investigators.

Weinstein’s spokeswoman Sallie Hofmeister dismissed the report, saying: “It is a fiction to suggest that any individuals were targeted or suppressed at any time.”

Let’s pick up the story with some insights into Black Cube, staffed by ex-Mossad agents, from the New Yorker

Last fall, Weinstein began mentioning Black Cube by name in conversations with his associates and attorneys. The agency had made a name for itself digging up information for companies in Israel, Europe, and the U.S. that led to successful legal judgments against business rivals. But the firm has also faced legal questions about its employees’ use of fake identities and other tactics. Last year, two of its investigators were arrested in Romania on hacking charges. In the end, the company reached an agreement with the Romanian authorities, under which the operatives admitted to hacking and were released. Two sources familiar with the agency defended its decision to work for Weinstein, saying that they originally believed that the assignment focussed on his business rivals. But even the earliest lists of names that Weinstein provided to Black Cube included actresses and journalists.

Bullying, cheating, lying, intimidation–these are all tactics from the Jew’s playbook. These values are incompatible with the values of Western civilization. Is it any wonder that Hitler felt that for Germany to prosper, it’s Jews needed to be expelled.

Disgraced Pervert Jew Anthony Weiner, aka Carlos Danger, Heads to Prison

He’s going to be getting five day a week sex addiction therapy in prison. LOL.

Will the Jew headshrinkers be able to cure the Jew patient of a Jewish inborn quality?

Stay tuned for the next thrilling episode when Carlos Danger is released from prison.

New York Post

Perverted ex-pol Anthony Weiner is headed to prison Monday for sexting with a 15-year-old girl — a crime he called his “rock bottom” after years of career-killing online antics.

The disgraced Democrat spent his Sunday holed up in his Union Square apartment, where a source in the building spotted Weiner’s dad, Morton, getting Starbucks at around 11 a.m.

Father and son then spent about five hours together ahead of Weiner’s trip to the Federal Medical Center in Devens, Mass., where’s he’s under orders to arrive for his 21-month sentence no later than 2 p.m.

The lockup — on a former Army base about 40 miles northwest of Boston — is just one of two sites that offer residential treatment for sex offenders, who share a common housing unit and undergo therapy five days a week.

Other infamous inmates include inside trader Raj Rajaratnam, who suffers from diabetes and high blood pressure, and Peter Madoff, a reported cancer survivor who helped older brother Bernie Madoff scam $20 billion from investors through his epic Ponzi scheme.

Weiner, 53, twice broke down in tears when he was sentenced in September, following earlier scandals that forced him from Congress in 2011 and sank a comeback bid that saw him leading the 2013 mayoral race before he was exposed as X-rated cyber-sexter “Carlos Danger.”

New York Police Moving Closer to Harvey Weinstein Rape Arrest

PAZ DE LA LHUERTA. LOOKS LIKE A TRANNY.

We should all be demanding that Harvey be arrested. Maybe there’ll be a change.org petition we can sign.

Ditto Kevin Spacey.

It’s not so much that the victims are in general worthy of sympathy from the alt-right, but that Harvey’s arrogance deserves serious punishment.

Maybe, if offered a plea deal, he’ll implicate more Hollywood trash in illegal behavior.

Mannish looking actress Paz de la Huerta claims Harvey raped her. Maybe he was feeling a little homo that night. Where do these ugly actresses of today come from? Ugh!

The Independent

The New York Police Department (NYPD) have said they are investigating a “credible” rape allegation against disgraced Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein.

The force’s chief of detectives, Robert Boyce, said they were working with New York’s attorney general to gather enough evidence before obtaining an arrest warrant.

His comments came after he was asked about a claim made by former Boardwalk Empire star Paz De La Huerta that Weinstein raped her in 2010.

NYPD investigating claims Harvey Weinstein raped actor twice in 2010
Lana Del Rey retires song ‘Cola’ over Harvey Weinstein scandal
UK sex assault inquiry into Harvey Weinstein broadens
Vanity Fair magazine reported that she gave her account to the publication over the phone.

Mr Boyce said the actress came to authorities with allegations that Mr Weinstein raped her last week.

He said she had “a credible and detailed narrative” and investigators “found corroboration” of her claims.

The actress had the “ability to articulate each and every movement of the crime – where she was, where they met, where this happened and what he did”, he added.

“We have an actual case here,” he said. “We’re happy with where the investigation is right now.”

Officers were continuing to gather evidence, he added.

Police officers would need to secure a warrant to arrest Mr Weinstein and Mr Boyce said that the case was complicated by the facts that Mr Weinstein lives in another state and that the alleged crime occurred in 2010.

But he said that if the producer “was still in New York and it was recent, we would go right away and make the arrest – no doubt.”

n an interview with CBS news, Ms de la Huerta alleged that Mr Weinstein raped her twice in 2010. She described one alleged incident as occurring after Mr Weinstein drove her home from a party and said the second alleged rape occurred after he drove to her apartment, and she was too drunk to consent.

Mr Weinstein’s representative Sallie Hofmeister did not immediately respond to questions about Ms de la Paz’s claims and the NYPD’s characterisation of her case.

Mr Weinstein has faced a torrent of sexual harassment accusations in recent months, but this would be the first time he has been charged as a result. The Los Angeles Police Department confirmed last month it was investigating a separate sexual assault allegations against Mr Weinstein.

Dozens of women have accused Mr Weinstein of harassment or rape, allegations that cost the mogul his position with the Weinstein Company. Mr Weinstein has denied that non-consensual sex occurred.

Charge him. We’ll applaud.

Masturbating Jew Journalist Mark Halperin Apologizes to Women He “mistreated”

I ran into a woman yesterday who is a fan of Jewish journalist Mark Halperin. We briefly mentioned his troubles with women accusers. I had a wild idea of telling her that he’s a Jew and that both he and Harvey Weinstein, whom she mentioned, are both Jews acting out their Jewish supremacy mind script.

It didn’t seem the right time or place to bring up Jewish hatred mixed with sexual attraction to shiksas, so I remained silent about his ethnicity.

Uproxx

While news of the Trump-Russia investigation’s first indictments made the rounds on Friday, political journalist Mark Halperin issued a statement of apology to his many accusers on Twitter. The NBC News political analyst, who until recently frequently guested on MSNBC’s popular Morning Joe program, is accused of sexually harassing several women during his time at ABC News. While his initial accusers numbered five, CNN reports at least a dozen women have alleged Halperin said or did sexually inappropriate things during their time together.

“I am profoundly sorry for the pain and anguish I have caused by my past actions. I apologize sincerely to the women I mistreated,” Halperin wrote before briefly changing the subject. Despite noting the “inappropriate” behavior of men toward women in these general terms, he did return the focus to his own misdeeds. “Toward the end of my time at ABC News, I recognized that I had a problem. I acknowledge that, and I deeply regret it. As I said earlier this week, my behavior was wrong. It caused fear and anxiety for women who were only seeking to do their jobs.”

Weirdly enough, Halperin somewhat echoed viral comments of his about the many women who accused then-Republican nominee Donald Trump of sexual harassment or assault.

“No one had sued me, no one had filed a human resources complaint against me, no colleague had confronted me,” he wrote in his statement. (“There’s nothing illegal,” he said in May 2016. “There’s nothing even kind of like beyond boorish or politically incorrect.”) Despite the odd discrepancy, Halperin subsequently admitted he “didn’t need a call from HR to know that I was a selfish, immature person, who was behaving in a manner that had to stop.”

Read the full statement below

NBC News offers a discreet in-depth look at the accusations. You’d never quite figure out what the hell Halperin was up to from most news accounts. It looks like a case of other Jewish journalists protecting one of their own.

However, Jewish owned and edited Business Insider pulls back the curtain a ways.

Halperin, who was dismissed from his roles at NBC and MSNBC this week after the sexual harassment claims first surfaced, was accused of the lewd acts from women who worked with him at ABC News.

One of the four new claims reported on Friday by CNN’s Oliver Darcy included one accuser who worked as an ABC News desk assistant in the late 1990s. The accuser, who CNN reported was her early 20s at the time, asked to meet with Halperin for career advice and went into his office after 10 p.m. While the two were talking, she told CNN, Halperin began masturbating behind his wooden desk while he stared at her.

“I sat in a chair across from him,” she said to CNN. “He was behind a wooden desk so I couldn’t see him from the waist down. As we had our conversation about my career he was masturbating. There was no question about it.”

“I pretended like I didn’t know what was going on and we talked a bit more and then he abruptly wrapped up the conversation,” she continued.

Her account, like others, was corroborated by friends who said they were told of the allegations years ago.

Another woman alleged that Halperin had violently thrown her against the window of a restaurant before coming “at me with his open mouth.”

“He put both hands on my arms and threw me against the window of the restaurant hard,” she said to CNN. “So my head banged against the window hard, in a way I thought people inside were going to think something terrible had happened to me.”

“This was rough, and hard, and violent,” she continued. “And not in a seductive way — in a way that telegraphs some anger and meanness.”

Although the woman said she avoided his attempt to kiss her, she said that about 10 minutes later, Halperin gave her a call.

“I was really hoping he would be calling to apologize,” she told CNN. “And he said something to the effect of, ‘You are never going to get a job. You’re never going to be hired in politics or media. Why would anyone ever hire you?'”

“And that’s when I broke down and started crying,” she continued.

CNN reported that Halperin denied some of the latest allegations, saying he had never masturbated in front of anyone or physically assaulted anyone. He released a statement on Friday to “apologize sincerely to the women [he] mistreated.”

You don’t have to be antisemitic to believe that there’s something wrong when Jews are solidly overrepresented in the current moral panic over sexual harassment. Yes, Bill O’Reilly is not a Jew and neither is Bill Cosby, but for Jews being less than 2 percent of the population, they sure are the stars of this sh*tshow.

O’Reilly Sues Critic for $5 Million Over “malicious” Facebook Post

MIKE PANTER, BILLO WANTS $5 MIL FROM HIM.

Anyone can file a lawsuit against anyone else at anytime. I recall I went to the federal courthouse in San Antonio, wrote a check for a $300 to $400 filing fee, filled in a form by hand, and I had a lawsuit going. That was without a lawyer at the time.

Most lawyers recommend that you leave the amount of damages open rather than specifying an amount. I was told that judges don’t like to be told how much you want early in a lawsuit.

Filing a lawsuit is easy. Winning is more difficult.

O’Reilly’s Facebook critic, Michael Panter, will need to come up with at least $200,000 to defend himself. There will probably be 60 to 100 pretrial motions that his lawyer will need to respond to. At $300 an hour the lawyer’s fees will add up.

If his critic told the truth about O’Reilly or if what he wrote is OPINION, then he should win. As a public figure O’Reilly can be criticized. In order for him to win his case, he will have to prove that Panter acted with malice.

You may recall that Sarah Palin sued the New York Times earlier this year for defamation. Her case was quickly dismissed.

Deadline

With more revelations about multimillion-dollar sexual harassment settlements becoming public, ex-Fox News Channel host Bill O’Reilly threw some muscle around in the courts today to the tune of $5 million.

“The relief includes, but is not limited to, reputational damages, monetary damages, special damages, punitive damages, costs, fees, injunctive relief, and such other relief as is just and proper, in an amount not less than $5 million,” said the two-page summons of notice filing (read it here) in New York Supreme Court against Michael Panter over a social media posting that didn’t exactly paint O’Reilly in the best of lights.

As a potential deal with Sinclair Broadcasting and return to the small screen looms for the former Factor frontman, the self-described “not a litigious guy” this morning followed up on his promise of yesterday to go after anyone who uttered what he considered untruths about him. A category into which former New Jersey state assemblymen Panter now falls, in O’Reilly’s view.

“This action seeks redress for Defendant Panter’s intentional, malicious, and bad faith actions in making defamatory and false statements in a publicly-available social media post,” says O’Reilly attorney Fredric Newman on Friday, designating Nassau County as the specific jurisdiction for the matter.

As damage spread from the news earlier this week of a $32 million sexual harassment settlement by O’Reilly just before Fox reupped his contract to $25 million annually, Panter went on Facebook claiming that an FNC-employed ex-girlfriend of his had once settled a harassment case with O’Reilly. He then asserted the NDA-bound ex was later contacted directly by O’Reilly looking for “anything you have” on another woman accusing the then-FNC host of sexual harassment.

“Plaintiff seeks damages for the public hatred, ridicule, disgrace, and permanent harm to his professional and personal reputations as a result of Defendant Panter’s publication of knowingly false defamatory statements about Plaintiff, which were made with actual malice, as well as Defendant Panter’s intentional infliction of emotional distress upon Plaintiff,” the summons adds without taking a breath.

While not actually a lawsuit — nothing like that has been filed, it seems — O’Reilly is clearly taking a page from ex-colleague Eric Bolling’s legal book and going after those he thinks are going after him.

Like the $50 million action this summer by the then-suspended and later pink-slipped Bolling against Huffington Post freelancer Yashar Ali over suggestive texts from the former Five co-host to female co-workers, this is not an actual lawsuit. O’Reilly, who was canned from FNC in April as more than $13 million in sexual harassment settlements by him and the company were revealed, may be trying to intimidate more than litigate.

Variety adds this information about Panter’s scribblings:

Panter is a one-time New Jersey politician who took to Facebook on Tuesday to write about how the one-time Fox News Channel star treated a former girlfriend of his after she had accused O’Reilly of sexual harassment. The summons says O’Reilly believes he has been defamed.

In the Facebook post, Panter offered details of how O’Reilly purportedly called his ex-girlfriend and solicited information from her about another woman who had also made harassment allegations against the former Fox News star.

Talent and Literary Agencies Drop O’Reilly in Wake of Sexual Harassment Accusations

In comments boards discussing Bill O, I’m seeing too many males acting like p*ssy-whipped feminists in their words of hatred directed at the former Fox News personality.

I will defend the right of every unmarried man of any age to flirt, woo, ask for a date, ask for sex, and otherwise pursue ANY female of his choice.

I will not defend sexual assault. No “grab ’em by the p*ssy” without a signal from the lady first. I said SIGNAL, not a signed legal document.

The libertarian in me leaves me in a quandary regarding voluntary agreements between men and women to exchange sex for pay raises, promotions, etc. Notice the qualifying word VOLUNTARY in the statement. The freedom to reach voluntary agreements without interference by the state is an important right that shouldn’t be impaired by political correctness.

My principles exclude married men from having these rights. Via marriage, a man voluntarily gives up certain rights, including the right to pursue women.

Sorry guys, but those are my principles.

The turd p*ssified males commenting on O’Reilly seem to think that NO MAN has a right to woo a woman. These running dogs of feminism are sex traitors, betraying natural human behavior in favor of feminist political correctness.

Some men seem to be happy that their masculinity is being stripped away via the demonization of Bill O.

Today he lost his literary agent, on top of losing his talent agent earlier.

Variety

In the wake of sexual harassment allegations, Bill O’Reilly has been dropped by his literary agency, WME. This news comes on the heels of the ending of his relationship with his talent agency, UTA, earlier this week.

In a statement to Variety, WME said, “We no longer represent Bill O’Reilly for future deals. It is our fiduciary responsibility to service the existing deals we have under contract, but we will not be working with him moving forward.”

O’Reilly is the author of seven books in his “Killing” series, including the most recent “Killing England: The Brutal Struggle for American Independence.”

The former Fox News anchor has recently come under renewed criticism after news broke that 21st Century Fox had renewed his contract right after paying a $32 million settlement.

He was fired by Fox News in April following a New York Times report that he had been involved in settlements of harassment and sexual harassment claims with five women totaling $13 million, dating back to 2002. On Saturday, the Times reported that O’Reilly personally reached a settlement in January with former Fox News legal analyst, Lis Wiehl, for $32 million, a fee far larger than previously disclosed settlements. In February, Fox News set a long-term contract with O’Reilly that included a huge salary boost, to $25 million a year from around $20 million under his previous deal.

Talent agency UTA had informed O’Reilly that it would not be renewing his contract when his deal expires at the end of 2017, according to a person familiar with the matter. “Bill has already lined up alternative representation,” said Mark Fabiani, a spokesman for O’Reilly.

Fabiani had no comment on the WME decision.

A lot of sexual interaction takes place via nonverbal communication by women. A gesture, a smile, a head toss, a look–all of these come into play. Women, sober women anyway, are not programmed to walk up to a man and say, “F*** me. Now.” Only in porn …

Anyway, the feminist rules for male-female interaction are intended to apply to whites only. Thus, they are anti-white as well as anti-male.

My final observation is that O’Reilly’s sex habits or behavior toward women have nothing to do with his ability to write books (which were ghostwritten anyway). I hope he finds another agent and writes a memoir telling his side of the sexual harassment story.

Parkinson’s Disease? Hillary Again Shows Signs of Serious Illness – Will Liberal Media Ever Report This?

FOREARM CRUTCHES. FOR AN ALLEGED BROKEN TOE???

The Gateway Pundit

Yesterday Hillary Clinton showed up at Yale using forearm crutches. The Internet was ablaze noting that a broken toe, which she said was the reason for her declining an event last week, does not require forearm crutches for balance.

These events again lead even casual observers to wonder again if Hillary has Parkinson’s disease. She and her campaign have never said so but it sure looks like this is the case.

Last year we pointed out that Hillary was very sick and reported that she was dishonest about many things including her health. As an example, during the primary season in 2016 Hillary had some sort of seizure or attack during a stop at a coffee shop. She blamed it on her chai tea.

The AP reporter who was there stated that she was not horrified by Hillary’s seizure, but her face showed a different story. WikiLeaks later uncovered that the reporter, Lisa Lerer, was one of many reporters who dined at Clinton campaign manager John Podesta’s house, diminishing her account of the event.

The article goes on to recall several instances of Hillary’s bizarre behavior, illustrated with videos.

The conclusion is clear to the Pundit:

Finally, WikiLeaks released an email from her team stating that Hillary was drunk in the afternoon and indicating someone should call her so she can sober up. This past weekend she was found campaigning at a bar, in Florida, mid-morning, on Sunday.

The MSM has not done its job in reporting accurately on Hillary’s terrible health. Those in the media that said something were punished. (Dr. Drew on CNN had his show cancelled shortly after questioning Hillary’s health.)

We stand by what we declared last year – Something is terribly wrong with Hillary Clinton’s health.

Time will prove us right.