Military Bases Named for Confederate Generals Facing Name Change: Fort Hood, Fort Bragg, Fort Benning, et. al.

Ten U.S. Army bases are facing a name change if Democrats in Congress have their way.

Those 10 bases are named after generals in the Confederate army. These men were honored by the American military because of their bravery and devotion to duty.

Democrats are angling to have the bases renamed after women and people of color. General John Bell Hood, the man for whom Fort Hood was named, lost an arm in one battle and a leg in another. After recovering, he went back into battle. Let the women and people of color who performed so heroically also have their names honored.

But don’t dishonor a good man for a few votes, Democrats.

Washington Examiner

House and Senate Democrats are pushing bills to strip the names of Confederate generals from Army base names and other military properties.

Rep. Yvette Clarke, D-N.Y., a Congressional Black Caucus member, is working on a bill that would mandate military installations be renamed in order to no longer celebrate men who fought for slavery’s continuance. Ten House Democrats from New York and New Jersey have signed on.

“Naming military property after armed insurrectionists with American blood on their hands is an affront to members of the Armed Forces, many of whom are people of color, who take an oath to protect and defend the Constitution,” Clarke said. “There are an ample number of meritorious members of the Armed Forces, who loyally served the United States, for whom military property could and should be named.”

Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., also plans to introduce a bill that would require Confederate leaders be removed from inside the U.S. Capitol building, according to a McClatchy report Thursday.

CORY BOOKER. RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT.

The new push to replace southern military leaders from the Civil War comes days after a white nationalist rally in Charlottesville, Va. Protesters turned out last Saturday to show support for a Robert E. Lee monument, but they were met by counter protesters. A man who is believed to be affiliated with the white supremacists later drove a car into a crowd of counter protesters, killing one woman.

The incident, along with a hate crime shooting at a black church in Charleston, S.C., last year, has prompted state and local leaders to reconsider Confederate statues in their own backyards.

Although Republicans in Congress have decried the Charlottesville car attack and racism in general, they remain on the sidelines as Democrats push to erase all references to the South’s pro-slavery views from government property.

If successful, Fort Bragg in North Carolina, Fort Hood in Texas, and Fort Benning in Georgia would be among the military facilities renamed after non-Confederate men and women.

Learn more about the 10 bases named after Confederate Generals at Business Insider.

Grunt Report published the military’s 2015 response to this issue:

“Every Army installation is named for a soldier who holds a place in our military history,” Brig. Gen. Malcolm B. Frost said in a statement, according to The Hill. “Accordingly, these historic names represent individuals, not causes or ideologies. It should be noted that the naming occurred in the spirit of reconciliation, not division.”

“fat, disgusting Communist:” Richard Spencer Breaks with Unite the Right Organizer Jason Kessler Over Heather Heyer Insults

HEATHER HEYER MEMORIAL.

There’s a lot going on here, so let me enumerate:

1. White nationalist leaders must be diplomats who choose their words carefully. Insulting any recently dead person is never good form, no matter who they are. Perhaps Osama bin Laden was an exception, but there aren’t many.

2. Leave the insults to propagandists like me: “dead pile of blubber” were the words I used in a title of one post. I’m anonymous as of now, so normies will just think I’m unhinged or whatever, not realizing I’m producing truthful words to make a point. Our leaders can disavow me. I don’t care.

3. Jason Kessler, who organized Unite the Right in Charlottesville, is a self-appointed leader of our movement. That means he should be careful with his words. Many alt-right white nationalists have rushed to condemn his words. Many now believe him to be a leftist plant, a Soros stooge, whose goal was to destroy our movement. See Tweets below.

4. Kessler admits he was on drugs when he wrote the insult. We absolutely do not need leaders who take drugs.

5. Weev, Andrew Anglin’s pal and the owner of the Daily Stormer (probably to help keep the site up by keeping Anglin’s name out of it), claims he hacked Kessler’s account and wrote the offensive Tweet. That’s garbage. We don’t need liars (possible Jew) like Weev as the leaders of our cause.

WEEV’S IMAGE FROM OK CUPID.

Snopes

The issuance of an explosive, late-evening tweet from the account of Jason Kessler, organizer of the “Unite the Right” rally that ended in fatal violence one week earlier in Charlottesville, Virginia, has prompted a rare condemnation from the entire length and breadth of the United States political spectrum, from extreme left to extreme right.

The criticism was earned by the nature of its comments directed at Heather Heyer, the counter-protester who was killed in a vehicular attack during the 11 August rally. The tweet (since deleted) went out at 9:25 P.M. on 18 August 2017

As of this writing, it is still unclear whether Kessler himself actually posted the tweet, which includes a link to the Nazi hate site Daily Stormer, (a source Kessler hadn’t typically quoted or referenced in previous tweets, despite his own avowed “pro-white” stance).

A few hours after that tweet appeared, in fact, Daily Stormer owner Andrew Auernheimer (aka “Weev”) claimed via Gab (another social media platform) that he had hacked Kessler’s Twitter account:

In subsequent tweets, Kessler (or whomever was controlling his account) “repudiated” the Heather Heyer post, blaming the outburst on stress, drugs, and alcohol:

Not long afterward, the account was locked, then completely deleted.

The controversy added another layer of intrigue to what appears to be an ongoing effort by Kessler’s former alt-right cohorts to isolate and discredit him in the wake of the disastrous Charlottesville event. A conspiracy theory floated by the likes of Alex Jones, Roger Stone, and others attempted to make the case that Kessler was an agent provocateur of the left (or the “alt-left“) and the violence-plagued rally was a “false flag” operation by George Soros and the so-called “deep state” to discredit the right and foment social unrest.

Apart from the fact that Kessler was at one time a Barack Obama supporter and evinced a passing interest in the Occupy movement, however, the grounds on which Kessler’s detractors have founded their attacks are demonstrably false: Kessler was never an employee of CNN (both CNN and Kessler confirmed this to us), for example, nor did he receive campaign consulting fees from a Democratic Congressional candidate in 2012, nor did he “suddenly” convert to an alt-right political stance when President Trump was elected.

The Heather Heyer tweet gave this group a new pretext for disavowing Kessler and pinning the Charlottesville debacle on everyone but the alt-right itself:

We reached out to Jason Kessler for comment, but he did not respond to our request. A spokesperson for Twitter, Inc. told us they can’t comment on the incident due to privacy restrictions.

To me, all of this is a big yawner. There is absolutely no reason on earth for me to care one way or another about whether mudshark Heyer is alive or dead. There’s no benefit to me to care about her or the feelings of her family. The only thing I care about is my extended white family, and our friends in the animal kingdom.

Liberals say that I should care about Mike Brown, Trayvon, Martin, Heather Heyer, and a host of other complete strangers whose lives offer me nothing. F*ck off liberals. A person only has so much altrusim. I’m saving mine for those who deserve it.

NOW THAT SHE’S GONE, THERE’S MORE FOOD FOR THE REST OF THE WORLD. SUCH ALTRUISM TO SACRIFICE HERSELF ON THE HOOD OF A CAR.

Pat Buchanan: America’s Second Civil War

They want us dead because we want to be ourselves, not drug-addicted, sports-addicted globalist zombies, exploited into slavery by the (((one percent.)))

Pat asks, “Whose side are you on?”

buchanan.org

“They had found a leader, Robert E. Lee — and what a leader! … No military leader since Napoleon has aroused such enthusiastic devotion among troops as did Lee when he reviewed them on his horse Traveller.”

So wrote Samuel Eliot Morison in his magisterial “The Oxford History of the American People” in 1965.

First in his class at West Point, hero of the Mexican War, Lee was the man to whom President Lincoln turned to lead his army. But when Virginia seceded, Lee would not lift up his sword against his own people, and chose to defend his home state rather than wage war upon her.

This veneration of Lee, wrote Richard Weaver, “appears in the saying attributed to a Confederate soldier, ‘The rest of us may have … descended from monkeys, but it took a God to make Marse Robert.’”

Growing up after World War II, this was accepted history.

Yet, on the militant left today, the name Lee evokes raw hatred and howls of “racist and traitor.” A clamor has arisen to have all statues of him and all Confederate soldiers and statesmen pulled down from their pedestals and put in museums or tossed onto trash piles.

What has changed since 1965?

It is not history. There have been no great new discoveries about Lee.

What has changed is America herself. She is not the same country. We have passed through a great social, cultural and moral revolution that has left us irretrievably divided on separate shores.

And the politicians are in panic.

Two years ago, Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe called the giant statues of Lee and “Stonewall” Jackson on Richmond’s Monument Avenue “parts of our heritage.” After Charlottesville, New York-born-and-bred McAuliffe, entertaining higher ambitions, went full scalawag, demanding the statues be pulled down as “flashpoints for hatred, division, and violence.”

Who hates the statues, Terry? Who’s going to cause the violence? Answer: The Democratic left whom Terry must now appease.

McAuliffe is echoed by Lt. Gov. Ralph Northam, the Democratic candidate in November to succeed McAuliffe. GOP nominee Ed Gillespie wants Monument Avenue left alone.

The election is the place to decide this, but the left will not wait.

In Durham, North Carolina, our Taliban smashed the statue of a Confederate soldier. Near the entrance of Duke University Chapel, a statue of Lee has been defaced, the nose broken off.

Wednesday at dawn, Baltimore carried out a cultural cleansing by taking down statues of Lee and Maryland Chief Justice Roger Taney who wrote the Dred Scott decision and opposed Lincoln’s suspension of the right of habeas corpus.

Like ISIS, which smashed the storied ruins of Palmyra, and the al-Qaida rebels who ravaged the fabled Saharan city of Timbuktu, the new barbarism has come to America. This is going to become a blazing issue, not only between but within the parties.

For there are 10 Confederates in Statuary Hall in the Capitol, among them Lee, Georgia’s Alexander Stephens, vice president to Jefferson Davis, and Davis himself. The Black Caucus wants them gone.

Mount Rushmore-sized carvings of Lee, Jackson and Davis are on Stone Mountain, Georgia. Are they to be blasted off?

There are countless universities, colleges and high schools like Washington & Lee named for Confederate statesmen and soldiers. Across the Potomac from D.C. are Jefferson Davis Highway and Leesburg Pike to Leesburg itself, 25 miles north. Are all highways, streets, towns and counties named for Confederates to be renamed? What about Fort Bragg?

On every Civil War battlefield, there are monuments to the Southern fallen. Gettysburg has hundreds of memorials, statues and markers. But if, as the left insists we accept, the Confederates were traitors trying to tear America apart to preserve an evil system, upon what ground do Democrats stand to resist the radical left’s demands?

What do we do with those battlefields where Confederates were victorious: Bull Run, Fredericksburg, Chancellorsville?

“Where does this all end?” President Trump asked.

It doesn’t. Not until America’s histories and biographies are burned and new texts written to Nazify Lee, Jackson, Davis and all the rest, will a newly indoctrinated generation of Americans accede to this demand to tear down and destroy what their fathers cherished.

And once all the Confederates are gone, one must begin with the explorers, and then the slave owners like Presidents Washington, Jefferson and Madison, who seceded from slave-free Britain. White supremacists all.

Andrew Jackson, Henry Clay of Kentucky and John Calhoun must swiftly follow.

Then there are all those segregationists. From 1865 to 1965, virtually all of the great Southern senators were white supremacists.

In the first half of the 20th century, Woodrow Wilson and FDR carried all 11 states of a rigidly segregationist South all six times they ran, and FDR rewarded Dixie by putting a Klansman on the Supreme Court.

While easy for Republicans to wash their hands of such odious elements as Nazis in Charlottesville, will they take up the defense of the monuments and statues that have defined our history, or capitulate to the icon-smashers?

In this Second American Civil War, whose side are you on?

Mother of Humongous Heather Heyer: “I will not talk to Trump”

President Trump confronted the violence that took place in Charlottesville, Virginia last Saturday by doing what presidents do: making a statement and calling the victim’s family.

Only Susan Bro, the mother of the victim of the car crash, Heather Heyer, refused the president’s phone call.

Her reasoning is no reasoning at all. It’s apparently what liberals do today–reject logic and move forward in hatred for Trump.

The Independent

The mother of Heather Heyer – the woman killed after a white supremacist allegedly drove in to a crowd of anti-fascist protesters – has said she now refuses to talk to Donald Trump.

Susan Bro said the President had initially tried to call her during her daughter’s funeral, but that she now refused to take any of the “frantic” subsequent calls from his aides after he equated anti-fascist counter protesters with neo-Nazis.

“I’m not talking to the president now, I’m sorry,” she told ABC News.

“After what he said about my child… it’s not that I’ve seen someone else’s tweets about him, I saw an actual clip of him at a press conference equating the protesters, like Ms Heyer, with the KKK and the white supremacists.”

Actually, Trump also said that there were good people on both sides and bad people on both sides.

You’re not supposed to say that. If you’re pro-white, you’re automatically bad people. If you’re anti-white, you’re automatically good people.

Them’s the CNN rules and Mama is playin’ by dem rules.

The mother of the 32-year-old, who was among three people to lose their lives during what is believed to have been one of the gatherings of far right and white supremacists for many years, this week spoke of her daughter at a memorial service in Charlottesville.

“My child’s famous final Facebook post said ‘If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention’,” she said. “My, did she make us pay attention. We talked about all the stuff that caught her attention.”

She then earned a standing ovation, as she added: “They tried to kill my child to shut her up. Well, guess what? You just magnified her.”

HEATHER HEYER ON THE LEFT. SHE WAS MAGNIFIED!

Following the incident last weekend, Mr Trump drew widespread criticism for his slow response to events. He initially said he was condemning in the “strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides, on many sides”. Following criticism that he had sought to draw some equivalence between the neo-Nazis and the activists, he issued a subsequent statement denouncing white supremacists.

Yet at a press conference on Tuesday at Trump Tower, Mr Trump reverted to his initial position. “I think there’s blame on both sides. And I have no doubt about it,” he said.

“You had a group on one side that was bad and you had a group on the other side that was also very violent. No one wants to say that, but I’ll say it right now.”

Mr Trump has since criticised a move that is taking place across the country to remove statues from public places associated with the Confederacy or slavery.

“Sad to see the history and culture of our great country being ripped apart with the removal of our beautiful statues and monuments,” he tweeted.

“You can’t change history, but you can learn from it.”

As most of us know, Trump condemned the violent antifa along with the thugs mixed in with the pro-white protesters. He was not slow about condemning all sides, no matter what the press claims.

To be so wrong, mom must get her fake news from CNN.

Coulter Dumps Trump

“IT’S OVER. MELANIA CAN HAVE YOU, YOU BASTARD.”

Ann Coulter is a smart alec who burnishes her brand by making outrageous statements that pump up her book sales and increase demand for her speaking engagements.

This day, she’s bad mouthing her man in a wild, emotional outburst of the kind she’s famous for–dripping with sarcasm.

The Daily Beast

So much for “In Trump We Trust.”

“I’m ticked off at the Emperor God,” said right-wing firebrand Ann Coulter, who last year authored a book with that worshipful title (subtitle: “E Pluribus Awesome”), as she processed Friday’s firing of chief White House strategist Stephen K. Bannon.

Increasingly disgusted and disheartened by the president’s inability, or unwillingness, to fulfill the anti-immigration, anti-Wall Street, anti-globalist promises for which Coulter had been one of his more impassioned supporters, she now refers to Trump sarcastically as a deity/monarch in his own megalomaniacal mind.

“If Trump wants to prove that he didn’t get the good ideas from Bannon, then it better be pedal-to-the-metal on deportations, the Wall, that tax hike on people who make more than $5 million a year, which I understand was Bannon’s idea but perhaps I was wrong. If that was Trump’s idea, then let’s have it!… Did you hear that on Wall Street, they were cheering today?”

In a conversation that amounted to a primal scream, Coulter repeatedly attacked her former hero for betraying his constituency, belittled White House aides such as Kellyanne Conway and Stephen Miller, accused the president of kowtowing to the same news media he professes to loathe, and otherwise raged at the dying of the wall along with any number of other populist policy prescriptions that Trump touted to beat the Republican establishment and Hillary Clinton.

“The millions of people who haven’t voted for 30 years and came out to vote for Trump, thinking ‘finally, here’s somebody who cares about us’—Nope!” Coulter declared. “Republicans, Democrats—doesn’t matter! Jeb exclamation point, Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton—doesn’t matter. Goldman Sachs is running the country!”

As for Stephen Miller, the former Jeff Sessions aide who briefly became the architect of the president’s anti-Muslim ban and occasionally jousts in the White House press room, “he’s just a speechwriter for the White House staff,” Coulter said. For a good part of the 2016 presidential campaign, Coulter insisted, Conway was a diehard Ted Cruz supporter.

“As late as the summer [of 2016], Kellyanne was saying that Trump built his business on the backs of the little guy,” Coulter continued. “You know I love the Emperor God, but he does have flaws. And one of them is his vast, yawning narcissism. He just seems to be obsessed with the fact that people give Bannon credit. And we all know that [Jared] Kushner is the one who won the White House for him.”

Coulter claimed it’s interim communications director Hope Hicks and former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski—whom Kushner pushed out of the campaign—who really deserve the credit for Trump’s political success. Coulter added that it was Kushner, along with former Goldman Sachs executive Gary Cohn and national security adviser Gen. H.R. McMaster, who finally got Bannon’s scalp and are probably targeting Conway and Miller as well.

Coulter added: “The Time magazine cover [a big-headed portrait of the man headlined as “President Bannon”] and the Saturday Night Live sketch [in which “Bannon,” wearing the black shroud of Death and carrying a scythe, sat at the Oval Office’s Resolute Desk while “Trump”/Alec Baldwin was vanquished to a tiny kindergarten desk]—every time he’s asked about Bannon, the Emperor God goes, ‘He didn’t win it for me! He only came in August! I already wrapped up the nomination!’ You don’t have to be a very sensitive person capable of reading body language to understand that Trump is obsessed by that. It’s driven him crazy.

“So did Kellyanne [arrive late to Trump’s campaign] and Trump gives her credit.”

With Bannon, however, “his little tiny ego explodes,” Coulter went on. “All you have to do with whatever White House staffer the media would like to get fired—just put him on the cover of a magazine and call him ‘President Whatever the Guy’s Last Name Is.’ It’s not good to show the media that you are so easily manipulable… The media is running the staffing at the White House now.”

Well, we got something good out of Ann. See the sentence I bolded? She’s saying the Jews control America.

Yay! Finally, some nice antisemitism from Ann.

HOW ANN SEES TRUMP.

Emotions are running high tonight. Those of us able to keep our wits about ourselves should try to calm things down. Bannon isn’t bad mouthing Trump. But he doesn’t have a book to sell and he’s not filled with sarcasm the way Ann is.

Bannon Speaks: “I’m Going To War For Trump”

I stand with Bannon. Get the war going ASAP. Drain the swamp. Name the traitors.

Scroll down past the story to read a comment written by Paul Kersey, whom I assume is the publisher of SBPDL.

In other related news, Trump’s friend (((Carl Icahn))) has thrown Trump under the bus after exiting the Trump train over Charlottesville and Confederate monuments.

Zerohedge

While Breitbart has warned of war ‘against’ Trump [4] – should he break from the policies upon which he was elected – former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon has spoken for the first time since being fired today.

In an interview with Bloomberg, Bannon said he was “going to war” for Trump…

“If there’s any confusion out there, let me clear it up.

I’m leaving the White House and going to war for Trump against his opponents… on Capitol Hill, in the media, and in corporate America,”

So, war it is!

Presumably, being outside The White House allows him more freedom to pursue his tactics. The question is – given the narrative being spun is he resigned by mutual agreement – does Bannon stil have Trump’s ear? And if so, will Cohn, Kelly, and Kushner stand for it? We already know his agenda is anything but in line with theirs. [6]

Notably The White House formally launched a probe of China’s intellectual property practices tonight – invoking Section 301 just as Bannon had said.

With regard his internal adversaries, at the departments of State and Defense, who think the United States can enlist Beijing’s aid on the North Korean standoff, and at Treasury and the National Economic Council who don’t want to mess with the trading system, Bannon was ever harsher…

“Oh, they’re wetting themselves,” he said, explaining that the Section 301 complaint, which was put on hold when the war of threats with North Korea broke out, was shelved only temporarily, and will be revived in three weeks. As for other cabinet departments, Bannon has big plans to marginalize their influence.

“That’s a fight I fight every day here,” he said. “We’re still fighting. There’s Treasury and [National Economic Council chair] Gary Cohn and Goldman Sachs lobbying.”

“We gotta do this. The president’s default position is to do it, but the apparatus is going crazy. Don’t get me wrong. It’s like, every day.”

Bannon dismissed the far-right as irrelevant:

“Ethno-nationalism—it’s losers. It’s a fringe element. I think the media plays it up too much, and we gotta help crush it, you know, uh, help crush it more.”

“These guys are a collection of clowns,” he added.

And finally, Bannon scoffed at The Democrats…

“…the longer they talk about identity politics, I got ’em. I want them to talk about racism every day. If the left is focused on race and identity, and we go with economic nationalism, we can crush the Democrats.”

* * *

Kurt Bardella, a Republican communications specialist who worked for Bannon at Breitbart but later denounced him, predicts the strategist would “feel liberated” by his departure.

“Now, he will be able to operate openly and freely to inflict as much damage as he possibly can on the ‘globalists’ that remain in the Trump Administration.”

Paul Kersey wrote in reply:

It’s looking more and more like it’s Kushner’s Presidency to lose.

Kushner and Bannon have battled for the position of Trump’s Rasputin since before the election. One week Kushner might be on top, and the next week it could be Bannon.

Then came Trump’s comments supporting the alt-right in Charlottesville. Bannon is blamed for putting those ideas in Trump’s ear.

Then there was the “off the record” Bannon interview, in which Bannon denies Trump’s potential military solution to North Korea, and in which Bannon talks about whom he is going to fire.

Then there’s the Bannon rental house in Miami interview. A tub filled with acid, porn movies and a meth lab are all in the story. It’s as if Bannon said, “Give me liberty, or give me meth”.

We hear that Trump’s cabinet members and advisors, former Goldman Sach Prez Cohn, former Soros partner Mnuchin, former Rothschild leader Ross, LBO king Ichan (who left Trump Town today) and goldmanite son-in-law Kushner, are highly offended by the Nazis chanting “Jews will not replace us”.

Well, Steve Bannon will not be chanting, “Jews will not replace us”, because he will be replaced. If one works in the Trump Administration, one shouldn’t get close enough to a moving bus, because one never knows when one will be thrown under said bus.

PRESIDENT KUSHNER AND FRIENDS.

Fox’s (((Krauthammer))): Trump a “moral disgrace”

There’s literally way too much anti-Trump rhetoric going on Tuesday night (and I’m sure all day Wednesday) for me to cover all of it.

What happened when Trump spoke up against leftist violence at his Tuesday presser is that the media knew that his words would reunite us in support of him. So, they began a relentless campaign to paint Trump as some horrible ogre–for condemning violence by anyone.

The media figured out that normies would say to themselves, “Yeah, that’s the right thing to say. No one should be allowed to get away with terrorist acts.” So, they began their slander. You know the score: Trump is a racist. Trump is the new Hitler. Trump wants to kill 6 million Jews. Impeach Trump now.

Jew Krauthammer has always been a “never Trump” guy. He’s capable of any slander, disguised as news commentary:

National Review

On Fox News, Laura Ingraham offered only a mild critique of President Trump’s comments on the white supremacist rally in Charlottesville. Charles Krauthammer would have none of it. He explained:

To critique what [President Trump] did today on the grounds that it distracts from the agenda or was a tactical mistake, I believe, is a cop-out. What Trump did today was a moral disgrace. What he did is he reverted back to where he was on Saturday, and made it very clear that what he read on Monday, two days later, was a hostage tape. Clearly reading off a prompter, saying these denunciations by name of the KKK et cetera — that wasn’t Trump speaking, that was the aids speaking. . . .

What Trump is missing here is the uniqueness of white supremacy, KKK, and Nazism. Yes, there were bad guys on both sides. That’s not the point. This was instigated, instituted — the riot began over a Nazi riot, a Nazi rally. And the only killing here occurred by one of the pro-Nazi, pro-KKK people.

Krauthammer, the lying Jew who speakth with forked tongue, has just labeled every single person rallying to save a Robert E. Lee statue from the scrap heap as a f*cking Nazi. F*ck Krauthammer. That big lie won’t fly.

Krauthammer also fails to mention that the Dodge driver (the person arrested, James Fields) is a Jew, like Krauthammer. We don’t actually know much of anything about Fields, but Krauthammer has the gall to call him pro-Nazi.

Why is this lying Jew Deep State operative even on TV? He’s repulsive in face and soul. Wheelchair bound Krauthammer also advocates murder. So long as it benefits Jews.