20 Year Old Rape, Murder of Blonde White Girl Pinned on Mexican Using New DNA Technique

SUNNY SUDWEEKS. MURDERED IN 1997.

Science has apparently developed a way to create a sketch of how a person looks, if there is a DNA sample from that person.

The technique has allegedly been used successfully to track down the murderer who raped and killed lovely Sunny Sudweeks.

The alleged perp is hiding in Mexico. Hopefully, he can be put behind bars for life. Mexico requires a promise of no death penalty before the country will extradite wanted perps to he U.S.

KTLA

It has been exactly 20 years since the body of Sunny Adrienne Sudweeks, a 26-year-old photography student, was found on her bed inside her Costa Mesa apartment. She had been raped and strangled.

Sudweeks’ family says the Orange Coast College student’s personality shone as brightly as her name. She was happy, artistic and made friends with ease. For decades, her family and Costa Mesa police detectives had been trying to comprehend who could carry out the brutal killing.

On Thursday, Costa Mesa police identified Felipe Vianney Hernandez Tellez, 43, as a suspect in the case. He is believed to be living in Oaxaca, Mexico, possibly near the resort town of Puerto Escondido with his wife and children. Hernandez Tellez previously worked as a painter and currently delivers rotisserie chickens, police said.

VICTIM AND KILLER. THE SMALL INSET PHOTO IS THE POLICE SKETCH DEVELOPED FROM DNA EVIDENCE.

Detectives identified Hernandez Tellez through DNA and face-simulation technology that was able to create a profile of a possible suspect for authorities. The profile, along with fingerprints from the crime scene, helped them link Hernandez Tellez to the crime.

SUNNY AND FAMILY.

There’s more coverage of this case, including how the DNA was used to construct an image of he killer’s face, at the Daily Mail.

Georgetown U. Prof Wants to Bring Back SLAVERY: He’s a MUZZIE

PROFESSOR JONATHAN BROWN. BEING ENSLAVED BY A MUSLIM IS GREAT. TRY IT. YOU’LL LIKE IT.

A graduate of Georgetown felt compelled to write a letter asking for the good professor’s termination.

Professor Jonathan AC Brown was born an Epicopalian, but became a Muslim. WTF???!!!

Heat Street title: Georgetown Islamic Studies Professor: Slavery OK, So is Non-Consensual Sex

Heat Street

A professor at Georgetown University is teaching his students that men do not need consent to have sex with women, and that slavery is justifiable under Islamic teachings.

Islamic Studies professor Jonathan Brown recently lectured at the International Institute of Islamic Thought, where he shared his alarming beliefs with students in attendance in his lecture, “Islam and the Problem of Slavery.” Freelance writer Umar Lee expressed his shock over the 90-minute lecture, which included explicit endorsements of rape and slavery.

Brown himself uploaded the lecture to YouTube.

According to Lee, Brown’s lecture was supposed to revolve around slavery in Islam, but the lecturer moved its focus to criticize the United States, United Kingdom and China. Brown described slavery in these non-Muslim societies as brutal, which they were, but lauded the historically inhumane practice in Arab lands and Turkey.

“Indeed, according to Brown, slaves in the Muslim world lived a pretty good life,” wrote Lee. “I thought the Muslim community was done with this dishonest North Korean style of propaganda. Obviously not.”

Brown decried the use of prison labor in the United States and highlighted other problems inherent in Western society, but refused to address the abuse of foreign laborers in the Gulf or the ghastly treatment of prisoners in the Middle East. It was a one-sided lecture that glorified his religion while demonizing Western society.

The Islamic Studies professor said that in Muslim societies, “slavery wasn’t racialized,” unlike the United States. Lee points out that this is untrue, given that in the Arab world, black people are referred to as “abeed,” the Arab word for “slave.”

Brown stated that slaves were “protected by Sharia,” omitting the various atrocities committed by slave-owners. Girls and women were forced into the sex trade and their male counterparts were often castrated.

“In general you don’t find the brutality that you see in American slavery,” said Brown, who described the historically common practice as “investments” and “walking venture properties” for slave-owners.

The soft-pedaling and revisionism of historical atrocities is deplorable, to say the least.

Historically, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams conducted warfare against vassal states of the Ottoman Empire to end the Barbary slave trade, in which North African pirates conducted constant raids into European coastal towns to capture men and women for slavery.

Brown defended slavery, stating, “It’s not immoral for one human to own another human” by comparing it to marriage—a quid pro quo arrangement in which both slave and master benefited from the arrangement.

“I don’t think it’s morally evil to own somebody because we own lots of people all around us and we’re owned by people,” said Brown.

A female attendee asked Brown about the permissibility of sex with slaves, to which the professor stated that “Consent isn’t necessary for lawful sex,” and defined consent as a Western concept that emerged with women’s suffrage and female body autonomy. Brown, he said, believes that marital rape was an invalid concept in Islam.

Had Prof. Brown’s words been spoken by a practicing member of any other religion, they would’ve lost their jobs and shunned out of the academic world.

Traitor Brown’s Wikipedia page offers an interesting look at scholarly Islam, as opposed to the shallow “religion of peace” nonsense that the mainstream media present.

I speculate that Brown converted to Islam to carve out a niche for himself in higher education, where he could more easily defend “oppressed” Muslims against Western tyranny. In short, he’s a lefist taking a sneaky route to mix leftist beliefs with religion.

Losing It? #Pizzagate Pedophile John Podesta Attacking the FBI

john podesta

Hillary Clinton campaign manager and star of the #pizzagate #podestaemails scandal has decided to pick a fight with the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Why?

Fox News

John Podesta, the former chairman of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, said Monday “forces within the FBI” may have wanted her to lose.

“There are at least forces within the FBI that wanted her to lose,” Podesta said during an interview with the website NewCo, Politico reported. “I’m not sure they really understood the alternative, but they wanted her to lose. I think that’s one possibility.”

I feel certain that there are many people in the FBI who are not corrupt, who did not want an unstable woman with a history of enabling sexual assault, white collar fraud at the Clinton Foundation, and the famous “Clinton body count” swirling around her.

So yes, some FBI people may have wanted Hillary Clinton to lose the presidential race.

The report said that Podesta did not offer any specific evidence to advance the argument, but Democrats have not been shy in the past to criticized FBI Director James Comey’s decision to—11 days before the election—alert Congress about the agency looking into additional emails.

“He (Comey) made a bad judgment, and I think virtually anybody who had opined on the topic…have said it was a terrible mistake of judgment.”

Podesta has not been shy about assigning blame for the election loss. In December, he said that Russian President Vladimir Putin was indeed “personally involved” in the election email hacks because Russia wanted Donald Trump as its “lap dog” in the White House.

Given the damning evidence in the Podesta emails that relate to child sexual abuse and murder, it’s odd that Podesta would pick a fight with the FBI. Is he setting up a defense for when he’s indicted and arrested, ready to claim that the FBI is biased against him?

That’s entirely possible, I believe.

This woman journalist has made a video as an insurance policy against being “suicided” for her coverage of the Clinton campaign, including her exposure of #pizzagate and #pedogate.

President Donald Trump is draining the pedophile swamp in America, as reported by Infowars. The video is ruined by a commercial for collagen. Skip to the 5:50 mark.

Published on Feb 16, 2017

Alex Jones talks with former CIA operative Robert David Steele about Donald Trump’s ongoing war against the pedophile elite in Washington.

Filthy Jew “Comedian” Judd Apatow Attacks Trump, Melania, and Barron in Unhinged OBSCENE RANT

We have to do something about these filthy Jew monsters who control Hollywood and set the tone of our sick culture.

Excerpt from the Daily Mail

Judd Apatow said he felt Donald Trump being elected president was similar to being raped in a vicious stand-up set that also attacked Melania and Barron.

The comedian known for producing blockbusters such as the 40-Year-Old Virgin and Bridesmaids made the comments in Los Angeles on Saturday night.

The father-of-two said in his opener at the Regent Theater: ‘I feel like I’ve just been raped and I just don’t know if I’m going to get murdered.’

He went on to crudely say Melania intentionally stays away from the White House so she wouldn’t have to have sex with her husband.

Apatow said of the first lady: ‘Every day she’s not in the White House is a day she’s not getting f***** by Donald Trump. Wouldn’t you stay away?’

He also targeted Barron regarding comments that the youngest Trump seems distant and standoffish during public appearances, Fox News reported.

Apatow said: ‘You ever see the look on his face when Trump’s talking?

‘People are like, “Is there something wrong with him?” No! He knows his dad’s a f****** a******!’

For what it’s worth, I observe that Apatow did not attack Ivanka, who is a convert to Judaism and is married to the Jew Jared Kushner. Is this a case of a Jew deferring to another Jew?

This insane Jew is also a movie and TV producer. He’s the dirtbag who gave the world Lena Dunham in her HBO trash series Girls.

lena dunham topless

Video: Paris at War

Watch! French Police Run from Rampaging African Mob in Paris

Short at 8 seconds but telling as to why the riots in France drag on.

Read more at The Gatestone Institute Europe

PARIS ON FIRE: Riots reach capital’s centre – buildings set ablaze and police attacked

Diversity doesn’t work. It never has. It creates small incidents typically.

In Paris, a small incident has now led to a big riot.

Although this report does not make it clear, earlier reports and photos I’ve seen suggest that the rioters are Negroid Africans.

A very informative two-minute video is embedded at the bottom of this post. Following that one is another purporting to show the latest from Paris. It too is highly informative.

express.co.uk

WIDESPREAD suburban rioting spilled into central Paris last night as hundreds went on the rampage over the alleged rape of a young black man by French police.

Officers were forced to unleash tear-gas on angry crowds as buildings and rubbish bins were set on fire around the Barbes Metro station, which is just around the corner from the Eurostar hub at Gare du Nord.

As fire crews went in to extinguish the blazes, lines of riot police were attacked, and shops were looted.

A policeman at the scene said: “Windows have been smashed and officers attacked.

“Small groups of protestors wearing hoods to hide their identities are causing trouble and then running away.

“Small groups of protestors wearing hoods to hide their identities are causing trouble and then running away.

“Everything is being done to try and disperse the crowds, but this could go on for a long time yet.”

Tension have been high in council estates in the Paris suburbs since February 2, when a man identified only as Theo was beaten up and allegedly raped.

The youth worker said he was sodomised by police with a truncheon, as well as being racially abused, spat at and beaten around his genitals.

One unidentified officer has been charged with rape, and three more with assault since Theo was sent to hospital.

He underwent emergency surgery, and has since been visited by President Francois Hollande, who has appealed for calm.

Police stations and squad cars have been attacked since, along with patrols trying to operate around France.

Last night’s protest at Barbes was an illegal one, with police in the 18th arrondissement refusing to give permission for it.

The areas is also close to the Sacre Coeur basilica in the Montmartre area – one hugely popular with tourists, including many from Britain.

Many fear a repeat of the mass housing estate rioting that blighted France over three weeks in 2005, leading to a State of Emergency being declared.