Wormy Little Jew Woody Allen Warns of “witch hunt” in Weinstein Scandal

Woody Allen knows his way around a sex scandal. He’s an alleged child molester himself. He married his adopted slant daughter.

A smart Jew would have kept his mouth shut about Harvey Weinstein. But the Jewish need to defend another Jew in trouble overcame Woody, I suppose.

Excerpt from The Guardian

Woody Allen has been forced to clarify remarks made about the Harvey Weinstein scandal, after stating that he felt “sad” for the disgraced producer.

Allen was widely criticised for comments made on Saturday in which he expressed sympathy for Weinstein, who has been accused of sexual abuse and harassment by a growing number of women.

“The whole Harvey Weinstein thing is very sad for everybody involved,” he told the BBC. “Tragic for the poor women that were involved, sad for Harvey that his life is so messed up. There’s no winners in that. It’s just very, very sad and tragic for those poor women that had to go through that.”

In the same interview Allen also warned that the revelations could lead to a “witch hunt atmosphere … where every guy in an office who winks at a woman is suddenly having to call a lawyer to defend himself”.

The director’s comments received widespread condemnation on Twitter, with Rose McGowan, who is one of the women accusing Weinstein of sexual assault, describing Allen as a “vile little worm”.

However, in a statement sent to Variety on Sunday, Allen said that his earlier remarks had been misconstrued. “When I said I felt sad for Harvey Weinstein I thought it was clear the meaning was because he is a sad, sick man,” the statement read. “I was surprised it was treated differently. Lest there be any ambiguity, this statement clarifies my intention and feelings.”

Styx has fun with Woody Allen and Hollywood. Nine minutes of Styx condemning Hollywood’s hedonism and entitlement mentality.

Clinton Foundation will reportedly keep Weinstein’s donations totaling $250,000

Whether you care about this issue or not, if the Clintons are made to look even sleezier than they already look, then this is a win for the alt-right and a loss for the left.

Fox News

THE LEAD STORY: The Clinton Foundation reportedly will not return as much as $250,000 in donations from disgraced Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein following multiple accusations of sexual harassment and rape … The foundation said donations, ranging from $100,000 to $250,000, have already been spent on projects, The Daily Mail reported. The move to keep the money was expected following tweets from the foundation’s spokesman Craig Minassian. “Suggesting @ClintonFdn return funds from our 330,000+ donors ignores the fact that donations have been used to help people across the world,” Minassian tweeted.

The calls to return Weinstein’s money were prompted after multiple actresses accused the Hollywood executive of sexual assault and rape, forcing numerous politicians and organization to grapple with the dilemma. When asked about Weinstein’s donations last week, Hillary Clinton said “there’s no one to give it back to” and that she would give any Weinstein contributions to charity. Former first daughter Chelsea Clinton avoided answering questions about Weinstein’s donations outside a Clinton Global Initiative University event at Northeastern University over the weekend.

This story is trending on Twitter, which is ready to rip the Clintons a third ***hole. (They already have two)

The libtard Tweets comparing Trump to Harvey Weinstein are really lame and ineffective. I’ve left those out because the comparison isn’t truthful.

The Daily Mail goes beyond Fox in offering additional details about the Clinton sleeze.

Hillary Clinton faced criticism during the election for accepting millions in donations from foreign governments while she was serving as secretary of state, including Qatar, Algeria and Oman.

Critics said the donations created a conflict of interest and were a potential violation of an ethics agreement Clinton signed with the Obama administration that placed restrictions on the foundation’s foreign government funding.

In 2006, the Clinton Foundation also accepted $25,000 from billionaire and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Epstein pleaded guilty to soliciting sex acts from a minor in 2008, after an extensive FBI investigation that looked into multiple allegations involving Epstein and underage girls.

I wonder if the Foundation paid the two weeks rent on this vacation home the Clintons rented for $100,000.

They say that charity begins at home. For the Clintons and their numerous vacation rentals, that’s true.

Slain College Student Had Restraining Order Against Negro Boyfriend Who Was Out on Bail Facing Unrelated Rape Charges

ALINA SHEYKHET. SHE’S RUSSIAN. AND DEAD.

MATTHEW DARBY. ALLEGED KILLER.

Alina Sheykhet knew better. She was Russian as far as I can tell. The Russians know the score on sh*tskins. They hate them. They hate race mixers too.

So Sheykhet, in search of Big Black C*ck, because it’s cool to be a wigger in Pittsburg, found herself an ape.

The thing is that she didn’t know apes, or she bought the Hollywood bullsh*t about them, or she didn’t care. Once an ape can’t have you, no one will.

The pretty Russian girl played Russian roulette with a round in every chamber.

She lost.

FOUND BY FATHER WITH HEAD DESTROYED, LYING IN POOL OF BLOOD.

New York Post

The brutal murder of a University of Pittsburgh student “could have been prevented” with better communication between counties and changes to the state’s bail system, according to a victim advocate in Pennsylvania.

Jennifer Storm, the state’s official victim advocate since 2013, outlined several steps to make it less likely that suspects awaiting trial would commit new crimes.

Her suggestions were made in connection to allegations against Matthew Darby, 21, who was arrested in South Carolina early Wednesday after his 20-year-old ex-girlfriend, Alina Sheykhet, was found dead in her off-campus apartment on Sunday by her father after she didn’t answer her phone. Paramedics at the scene said she died from blunt force trauma, police said.

ALINA WITH THE DUMB APE.

“I think that this a horrific tragedy that could have been prevented,” Storm told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. “If that knowledge doesn’t catapult people to be willing to make systematic changes in their counties, I don’t know what will.”

In February, Darby was charged with raping an ex-girlfriend in Indiana County. Several months later, he was charged with felony criminal trespass for allegedly breaking into Sheykhet’s apartment on Sept. 26. In both cases, he was released on $10,000 bond, and according to the newspaper, there’s no indication that officials in either county noticed the similar charges or communicated with each other.

Officials in Indiana County have indicated that an electronic notification system alerted them to the new trespassing charge, but details have not been provided. Officials ultimately decided not to consider pretrial detention until after a preliminary hearing in the new case, which has not yet happened, the Post-Gazette reports.

Storm’s recommendations include better “information sharing,” risk assessment software to suggest bail conditions, policies on responses when new charges are filed against released suspects, and giving police the ability to immediately arrest anyone suspected of violating bail conditions.

“I don’t know about you, but [a trespassing charge is] going to prompt me to investigate further,” Storm told the newspaper. “If they’d inquired, they would have found that he was at the bedroom door of a young female. That should send anyone’s skin crawling.”

WITH UNIDENTIFIED WHITE GENTLEMAN.

Sheykhet, who police suspect was murdered by Darby using a claw hammer and two knives, had recently filed for and received a protection-from-abuse order against Darby, telling authorities that he climbed up a gutter to break into her apartment via a second-floor window.

ALINA’S BLACK MALE ROOMMATE.

PARTYING WITH ROOMMATE.

“He did this because I left him and stopped answering his phone calls,” Sheykhet wrote, describing Darby as abusive, jealous and controlling.

Officials in Allegheny County’s Court Administrative Office and Pretrial Services, meanwhile, have not answered questions about their handling of the trespassing charge, according to the Post-Gazette.

“He has trespassed and come to the door of another female,” Storm told the newspaper. “He should have been incarcerated.”

BEACH FUN.

TAT SELFIE.

You can see more photos and learn more about her at her Ask site: Ask.fm/alinasheykhet

FAVORING A WIGGER LOOK HERE.

Darby reminds me of dumb Tyrone:

Chelsea Clinton runs from questions about handing back Harvey Weinstein’s $250,000 donations

CHECK OUT THE EYE BAGS.

The greed is shocking even for the Clintons.

They are worth over $100 million and yet they are waffling over the return of Harvey Weinstein’s money or the donation of those dollars to a real charity. The sum of $250,000 would be small potatoes to them. But when they left the White House in 2001 they allegedly took the silverware, dishes, and other government property, so greed is nothing new to them.

They’re garbage.

Excerpt from the Daily Mail

Chelsea Clinton fled to her car to avoid answering questions from a DailyMail.com reporter on Saturday about whether the Clinton Foundation will return up to $250,000 in donations from accused rapist Harvey Weinstein.

The former first daughter, who is a board member of the Clinton Foundation, ran from questions while she was attending a Clinton Global Initiative University event in Northeastern University in Boston.

The night before, Clinton Foundation press officials blocked a DailyMail.com reporter attempting to approach Bill Clinton to ask him questions at a public event.

A number of Democratic politicians and groups, including the University of Southern California, have said they will return donations from Weinstein after he was accused of sexual assault, harassment or rape by over two dozen women.

Hillary Clinton said earlier this week she would return Weinstein’s donations to her 2016 campaign. The disgraced movie producer gave over $30,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund and $5,400 to Hillary for America.

But the Clinton Foundation has declined to comment on whether it will return Weinstein’s donations. Weinstein has given between $100,000 and $250,000 to the foundation, according to its records.

The Foundation declines to come clean on how much individual donors give.

‘Chelsea, will the foundation give back the donations from Harvey Weinstein?’ a DailyMail.com reporter asked Chelsea as she left a CGI lunch event through a side door on Saturday. ‘Do you plan to return the $100,000?’

Chelsea, flanked by Clinton Foundation officials, looked straight ahead and ignored the questions as she scurried through the side lot and ducked into her waiting black sedan. Security blocked the reporter from approaching her car.

Readers at the Daily Mail don’t like the Clintons. The comments are pretty funny. Truckerbear 1942 has it figured out:

The Clintonsare an horrendous family just out to get what they can and I am sure that whilst they might say they will return donations, in fact will merely channel them to their own use under a dfifferent name.

Harvey Weinstein expelled from motion picture academy

At least some of the pukes who gave the boot to Harvey knew exactly what he had been doing and said nothing.

These hypocrites do not deserve a break. Let (((Hollywood))) continue to devour more of its own.

We see how quickly Jews will turn on their fellow Jews when the chips are down and shekels are at stake.

Excerpt from Los Angeles Times

mbattled film mogul Harvey Weinstein — a once-dominant force in the Academy Awards who rewrote the rules of Oscar campaigning — has been expelled from the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences in response to mounting allegations of sexual harassment and assault against him.

The film academy’s 54-member board of governors, which includes such industry luminaries as Steven Spielberg, Tom Hanks, Kathleen Kennedy and Whoopi Goldberg, voted in an emergency meeting on Saturday morning to remove Weinstein from the organization’s ranks in an unprecedented public rebuke of a prominent industry figure. The move marked the latest blow in Weinstein’s stunning downfall and, in symbolic terms, amounts to a virtual expulsion from Hollywood itself.

In removing Weinstein from its ranks, the academy said in a statement, “We do so not simply to separate ourselves from someone who does not merit the respect of his colleagues but also to send a message that the era of willful ignorance and shameful complicity in sexually predatory behavior and workplace harassment in our industry is over. What’s at issue here is a deeply troubling problem that has no place in our society. The Board continues to work to establish ethical standards of conduct that all Academy members will be expected to exemplify.”

Since reports of Weinstein’s alleged misconduct toward dozens of women first surfaced in the New York Times on Oct. 5, the academy had been under increasing pressure to take action against him. On Tuesday, the National Organization for Women publicly called for Weinstein’s removal, stating, “A sexual predator doesn’t deserve the privilege of an academy membership — and all the opportunities to wield outsize power that come with it.”

Don’t give the Clintons and other high profile Democrats a pass either.

Twenty-one members of the film academy’s board are women — as is its chief executive, Dawn Hudson — and in recent years the organization has taken steps to dramatically increase the number of women in its historically overwhelmingly male ranks.

In the past several days, a number of academy members expressed their feelings both privately and publicly that Weinstein had no place in the film industry’s most prestigious organization. CBS Films President Terry Press, who regularly battled Weinstein on the awards trail during her tenure as a marketing executive at DreamWorks, vowed in a Facebook post to quit the academy if he was allowed to remain. “The idea that anyone would give him a second chance or entertain the notion that he can change is beyond absurd,” wrote Press.

Even Weinstein’s brother, Bob — with whom he ran Miramax Films and then Weinstein Co. — said in an interview published Saturday in the Hollywood Reporter that he felt the academy should expel him, adding that he planned to write a note to the group to that effect.

But within the academy some wrestled with the decision, fearing that it could set a precedent that would require the academy to police its members’ behavior going forward. As many have pointed out in recent days, other Hollywood figures who have come under attack for their treatment of women — including Bill Cosby, Roman Polanski and Mel Gibson — remain members of the academy in good standing.

The academy’s bylaws give the board of governors free rein to expel members “for cause,” but that power has very rarely been exercised. The last member to be banished from the group was actor Carmine Caridi, who was booted in 2004 for sharing promotional copies of films that were later pirated. Sources close to the academy say that other members had been more quietly suspended in years past for selling their tickets to the Oscars ceremony, but nothing ever rose to the level of attention surrounding Weinstein.

You see the problem:

It’s time to clean house.

As Trump would say, “Drain the swamp.”

(((Oliver Stone))) Says Don’t Condemn Weinstein, Then Backtracks As He is Accused of Groping

Jew or Not Jew rates Oliver Stone as barely a Jew since his father was Jewish and his mother Catholic.

Hollywood’s Jewish ingroup support mechanism has broken down in the Harvey Weinstein affair, but apparently Stone didn’t get the word.

Ladies and gentlemen, we’ve got a real sh*tshow going on. May it continue and ruin more careers of the elites.

DEFENDING HARVEY:

People

Oliver Stone opted against condemning Harvey Weinstein following multiple allegations of sexual harassment.

The Snowden director, 71, told reporters Friday at the Busan International Film Festival that he believes people are innocent until proven guilty.

“I’m a believer that you wait until this thing gets to trial,” he said, according to The Hollywood Reporter. “I believe a man shouldn’t be condemned by a vigilante system.”

Stone continued, “It’s not easy what [Weinstein is] going through, either. During that period he was a rival. I never did business with him and didn’t really know him.”

“I’ve heard horror stories on everyone in the business,” Stone adds. “So I’m not going to comment on gossip. I’ll wait and see, which is the right thing to do.”

People left this out: “It’s not easy what he’s going through, either”

Actually, although Stone’s wording was inarticulate, he’s right about the left trying people in the press. Innocent until proven guilty is a foundational tenet of Western justice.

STONE BACKTRACKS HOURS LATER:

Buzzfeed

However, Stone issued a statement on his Facebook page hours later clarifying his comments: “I’ve been traveling for the last couple of days and wasn’t aware of all the women who came out to support the original story in the New York Times,” he said.

“After looking at what has been reported in many publications over the last couple of days, I’m appalled and commend the courage of the women who’ve stepped forward to report sexual abuse or rape.”

Stone added he would “recuse himself” from his forthcoming Showtime series Guantanamo as long as Weinstein is involved.

Most of Hollywood refused to condemn Harvey until it became clear that if they didn’t they were going to pay a severe penalty for their silence and their hypocrisy. Stone must have gotten the same message: Disavow or be eviscerated by the press and social media.

However, Stone’s disavowal may be too late. He’s the latest Hollywood male celebrity to be accused.

OLIVER STONE ACCUSED

Fox News

Carrie Stevens, who was Playboy’s Playmate of the Month in June 1997, said in an interview that famed filmmaker Oliver Stone once grabbed one of her breasts at a party.

The New York Daily News reported Thursday that Stevens was at a party honoring Stone more than 20 years ago. She said Stone walked up to her, “reached out and … honked it like a horn.”

“He was really cocky, had this big grin on his face like he was going to get away with something,” she told the paper. She was 22 at the time.

Stevens told the paper that others saw the incident, but nobody said anything because “that’s what’s going on in Hollywood. That’s why things have to change.”

Some 30 women — including actresses Angelina Jolie, Ashley Judd and Gwyneth Paltrow — have spoken out recently to say Weinstein had sexually harassed or sexually assaulted them. Rose McGowan, who has long suggested that Weinstein sexually assaulted her, tweeted Thursday that “HW raped me.”

The initials were an apparent reference to Weinstein, and the Hollywood Reporter said the actress confirmed to them that she was referring to the disgraced film mogul. The New York Times earlier reported that Weinstein paid a financial settlement of $100,000 to McGowan in 1997 over an incident in a hotel room at the Sundance Film Festival in Utah.

“Any allegations of non-consensual sex are unequivocally denied by Mr. Weinstein,” Weinstein’s representative Sallie Hofmeister said Thursday.

As to the Playboy mansion party, get real. When a nude model goes there, she’s going to get “unwanted” attention of the type she really wants.

CARRIE STEVENS. HONK, HONK.

As to the rest of the saga of Harvey’s ungentlemanly behavior, Hollywood has always played by its own rules, not by the rules of tradtional America.

It’s nice to see (((Hollywood))) devouring its own. Keep it up guys.

Traitor Jane Fonda Admits She Knew About Harvey Weinstein’s Sexual Assaults but Said Nothing

Vietnam-era traitor Jane Fonda had the nerve to speak out against the U.S. while in North Vietnam, but the hypocrite couldn’t bring herself to talk about Harvey Weinstein until it became safe to do so.

She turns her condemnation of him in an interview into a condemnation of white men in general and Donald Trump in particular.

She’s garbage.

People

Jane Fonda says she first heard about Harvey Weinstein‘s alleged misbehavior last year and she’s ashamed she hasn’t spoken about it until now.

“I found out about Harvey about a year ago and I’m ashamed that I didn’t say anything right then,” Fonda, 79, told Christiane Amanpour during an interview for CNNMoney on Thursday.

Explaining why she stayed silent, Fonda said, “Because I guess it hadn’t happened to me and so I didn’t feel it was my place.”

The Frankie and Grace star said that her knowledge of Weinstein’s alleged behavior came from Rosanna Arquette — one of the 13 women who came forward with sexual harassment allegations against Weinstein on Tuesday in The New Yorker.

“I’m glad it’s coming out,” Fonda added. “I’m so proud of those fellow actors that are speaking up and I know that it’s taken a long time. It’s a very, very, very, hard thing to do. You don’t get anything out of it as the person who has been victimized. But it’s important that it come out.”

“But let’s not think that this is some unique, horrific — this goes on all the time,” Fonda continued. “It’s this male entitlement— in Hollywood and everywhere, in offices and businesses all over the world; in bars, in restaurants, in stores, women are assaulted, abused, harassed and seen for just being sexual objects, there for a man’s desire instead of as whole human beings.”

Asked whether she had ever been sexually harassed, Fonda replied that she had — but not by Weinstein.

“It has happened to me. It has. I only met Harvey when I was old. And Harvey goes for young because that’s more vulnerable. You know. But it’s very, very common,” Fonda said before saying the director of her first French film tried to sleep with her.

“The director didn’t speak very good English and he flew to L.A. to pitch me the story, which was hard for me to even understand what the story was,” she said. “But I remember him saying to me — and I was 20 — he said to me, you know, in the movie, your character has to have an orgasm and I really need to know what kind of orgasms you have. And so he wanted me to sleep with him.”

“I turned him down. I got the part anyway. And he was — you know, he was very nice after that,” Fonda said before adding that any woman who finds herself in that situation has to say no, no matter what she’s worried about losing. “You have to understand that you have control over your body and that you have to say no and you have to talk and tell when something like that happens. If we all talked and told, then they would be too afraid to do it, I think. I hope.”

Fonda also brought up how important it is for men to support women when they speak up about sexual harassment and assault. “We have to be helped by men. It’s important to know that not all men are predators. There are good men and the good men have to stand up and defend us and embody other ways of being. We have to believe the women who come forward. We have to speak out.”

Although she admitted that so long as Donald Trump is in the White House, it sends a bad message. “Unfortunately that counteracts a lot of the good that we’re doing because a lot of men see, well, our president does it and he got elected, even after people discovered that he was an abuser so I’m just going to go ahead and do what I want to do. It’s unacceptable and we can’t ever forget that and we have to stand up to them.”

Fonda fails to note that Trump said they let you do it. It’s called consent when they let you do it. Only a batty lefty would not understand that.

Watch, if you can stomach her: