Paul Craig Roberts Warns “Trump Now A Captive Of The Deep State”

I’d like to think that President Trump had good intentions while candidate Trump. It seems to me that the problem, part of it anyway, is that his negative press coverage (91 percent negative) made it impossible to govern without a truce of sorts with the (((Deep State.))) I’d also like to think that he’s playing with their minds and is intent on double crossing them when the time is right.


When the gullible and insouciant American public and the presstitutes who participate in the deceptions permitted the Deep State to get away with the fairy tale that a few Saudi Arabians under the direction of Osama bin Laden, but without the support of any government or intelligence agency, were able to outwit the entirety of the Western Alliance and Israel’s Mossad and deliver the greatest humiliation in history to “the world’s only superpower” by making the entirety of the US government dysfunctional on September 11, 2001, Washington learned that it could get away with anything, any illegal and treasonous act, any lie. The gullible Western populations would believe anything that they were told.

Continue reading

Fake News? Russia Says It Can Wipe Out Entire U.S. Navy with ONE Electronic Bomb

Fox News

Russia has claimed it can disable the entire US Navy in one fell swoop using powerful electronic signal jamming.

A news report from the country – where the media is essentially controlled by the state – said the technology could render planes, ships and missiles useless.

The newsreader says: “Today, our Russian Electronic Warfare (REW) troops can detect and neutralise any target from a ship’s system and a radar, to a satellite.”

The news report claims a single Russian war plane flew several times around American destroyer the USS Donald Cook in the Black Sea several years ago, disabling its systems and leaving it helpless.

The report also claims they are capable to creating electronic jamming domes over their bases that make them invisible on radar screens.

The propaganda piece even quotes top US General Frank Gorenc as saying: “Russian electronic weapons completely paralyse the functioning of American electronic equipment installed on missiles, aircraft and ships.”

The reporter adds: “You don’t need to have expensive weapons to win – powerful radio-electronic jamming is enough.”

The news comes after Donald Trump dispatched the USS Carl Vinson, powered by nuclear reactors, carrying almost 100 aircraft and accompanied by destroyers, a cruiser, and a submarine to the Korean Peninsula.

And the commander-in-chief is said to be bolstering American deployment in the region by sending the USS Ronald Reagan and the USS Nimitz to the Sea of Japan next week.

Russia, along with China, is said to have sent a spy ship to the area to ward off the task force amid rising tensions in the region.

And Putin urged the US to show “restraint”.

Meanwhile, in response to this story, Popular Mechanics reports that there is no electronic bomb.

The Russian TV report is an explainer on Russian Electronic Warfare (REW) troops, which the reporter claims can “neutralize any target” from “a ship’s system to a radar to a satellite.” This apparently includes synthetic aperture radars on NATO satellites, aircraft, and other platforms, which can form images of targets in the air and on the ground using radar waves. In this case, “neutralizing” doesn’t mean blowing something to bits, but rather jamming its radar sensors to effectively render it blind.

The Russian news report concludes with the bombastic line, “You don’t need to have expensive weapons to win – powerful radio-electronic jamming is enough.” That claim isn’t supported by the actual report, which says REW systems can only shut down enemy radars and hide friendly forces. To actually win a war, you need to kill the enemy and break stuff—something radio waves can’t do.

The Russian television and Sun tabloid story are both blends of real and fake news. Russia’s electronic warfare troops do indeed have some powerful electronic warfare systems—but pay no mind to oddball claims that they can make enemy sailors resign out of sheer fear or win wars singlehandedly.

Putin’s Father of All Bombs FOUR TIMES BIGGER Than Trump’s Mother of All Bombs


I suspect that the Russians planted this story in the Western press in order to defuse the enthusiasm of Americans for Trump’s use of the Mother of All Bombs on Afghanistan.

Common sense would say that Russian president Vladimir Putin wants to discourage more U.S. military interventionism.

By the way, the photo collage above was originally used by the press in a report on what great buddies Trump and Putin were.

From the standpoint of world peace, it’s too bad that the (((neocons))) in the American (((Deep State))) had to ruin America’s relationship with Russia. Because of their blood lust, the world is a much less safe place than it was a few months ago. At least to me it seems that way.

Here’s the story on the Russian super weapon.

The Sun

THE Russian military has a secret bomb which is FOUR TIMES as powerful as the mega-weapon Donald Trump’s military used to blast ISIS in their mountain hideaway.

The US bomb GBU-43B is the biggest non-nuclear bomb ever to be used in combat and proudly brags the tag The Mother Of All Bombs.

Now it has been revealed Vladimir Putin has even bigger bomb in his mighty arsenal and it really is ‘the daddy’.

Officially known as the Aviation Thermobaric Bomb of Increased Power – it’s already being dubbed the ‘Father Of All Bombs’.

It is reportedly four times bigger than the MOAB, carrying 44 tonnes of TNT and explodes in the same way as the US bomb.

Yet due to the sheer number of explosives crammed inside it causes similar blast damage to that of a nuclear weapon.

The bomb was test-fired by the Russians in 2007 where the temperature produced by the blast was also twice as high than that produced by the MOAB.

The bomber-dropped bomb is designed to explode midair by ignition of a fuel-air mixture that produces massive blast effects comparable to smaller tactical nuclear weapons.

“All that is alive merely evaporates,” General Alexander Rukshin, deputy chief of the Russian staff, was quoted as saying at the time.
Thermobaric devices detonate in two stages, with an initial blast dispersing explosive materials in a cloud that is then ignited by a secondary blast.

The explosion generates a much bigger pressure wave than conventional explosives, followed by a vacuum effect that compounds damage and injuries caused by the blast.

Russian sources have claimed their weapon has a power equivalent to 44 tons of TNT – or four times that of the MOAB – despite being lighter than its 21,000lb US counterpart at 16,650lb.

Because of its yield and the extremely high temperatures it generates, it is slated to replace smaller battlefield nukes currently in the Russian arsenal.

When the Russian air force began bombing rebel positions in Syria in September 2015, smaller thermobaric bombs were used against ISIS positions, but the FOAB has yet to be deployed.

Breaking! U.S. May Launch Strike If North Korea Reaches For Nuclear Trigger

It’s happening.

Where it ends no one can say for sure.


The United States may unleash bombs in North Korea aimed at the country’s nuclear weapons test facility.

This breaking news may be a psy op designed to send a message to North Korean leader Kim Jong Un that he must stop making nukes. Or it may be a leak of actual American military plans. No one outside the small White House circle of advisors and the top miltitary brass can say for sure.

Equally true is no one knows for sure what Kim will do in response. Will he fire weapons at Seoul, South Korea, just over the border. Will he fire a nuclear tipped missile at Japan?

President Donald Trump is playing a game of nuclear chicken the likes of which has not been seen since the Cuban missile crisis in 1962.

Within the framework of developments in Korea, the use of the Mother of All Bombs in Afghanistan today was clearly intended to strike fear into the heart of Kim and his generals.

China and Russia are the wildcards, as explained in this analytic piece by NBC News.

NBC News

The U.S. is prepared to launch a preemptive strike with conventional weapons against North Korea should officials become convinced that North Korea is about to follow through with a nuclear weapons test, multiple senior U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News.

North Korea has warned that a “big event” is near, and U.S. officials say signs point to a nuclear test that could come as early as this weekend.

The intelligence officials told NBC News that the U.S. has positioned two destroyers capable of shooting Tomahawk cruise missiles in the region, one just 300 miles from the North Korean nuclear test site.

American heavy bombers are also positioned in Guam to attack North Korea should it be necessary, and earlier this week, the Pentagon announced that the USS Carl Vinson aircraft carrier strike group was being diverted to the area.

The U.S. strike could include missiles and bombs, cyber and special operations on the ground.

Continue reading

Donald Trump carried out Syria missile strike ‘after being convinced by daughter Ivanka’

What I think we know about the American missile attack on Shayrat Air Base is that Trump advisor Steve Bannon was against it.

So who convinced Trump to do an abrupt about face and veer off his stated policy of noninvolvement in foreign conflicts?

I can think of several possibilities:

1. The generals who surround Trump. Mad Dog Mattis comes to mind.

2. Ivanka Trump and her husband Jared Kushner. Both are neocon globalists whose positions are at odds with Trump’s campaign promises.

3. Trump was never sincere about his intentions regarding overseas conflicts. That’s unlikely since he has a long, long track record of opposition to American involvement in foreign wars. Or perhaps he was sincere, but being mercurial, simply changed his mind. Perhaps he wants the world to see him as a tough guy.

4. Unknown actors are blackmailing Trump by threatening his family, a sex scandal, or criminal acts (taxes, etc.) that could lead to his impeachment and possibly imprisonment.

Media stories have focused on Jared Kushner’s increasing sway over Trump. Now, we have a new story that implicates First Daughter Ivanka.

DONALD Trump’s decision to rain down 59 Tomahawk missiles on a Syrian air base was sparked by his daughter Ivanka’s “heartbroken” response to Assad’s chemical attack, insiders have claimed.

Trump has long opposed military intervention in Syria – both as a private citizen when he criticised Obama’s intervention in the region, and as President.

But the Republican firebrand is believed to have made his dramatic U-turn after being convinced by his daughter Ivanka’s impassioned response to the Assad regime’s use of chemical weapons on Tuesday.

A source close to the first family said: “Increasingly, Ivanka is having more and more influence over her father.

“She often counsels her father and was very clear that action needed to be taken against Assad in some form.”

“Ivanka was infuriated over the lack of a direct response in the immediate aftermath of the Syrian attack.”

Responding the morning after Assad’s attack, The President’s eldest daughter tweeted: “Heartbroken and outraged by the images coming out of Syria following the atrocious chemical attack today.

Following her comments, the President’s stance on a military response began to shift, quickly claiming the attack was an “affront to humanity” and blasting Assad’s “heinous” actions.

And the following day, hours before launching a flurry of 2,900lb missiles into the country, the President had shifted from isolation to intervention.

He said: “I think what Assad did is terrible.

“I think what happened in Syria is a disgrace to humanity and he’s there, and I guess he’s running things, so something should happen

I guess this is plausible. Trump is a father who seems to like pleasing his children. But honestly, do we want Ivanka Trump designing shoes and handbags or designing American foreign policy.

I know my answer.

Bring on the high heels.

Nigel Farage turns on Donald Trump after US airstrikes on Syria

Britain’s nationalist UKIP party former leader and Trump supporter Nigel Farage is questioning the military action taken by President Donald Trump on Thursday night.

The title of this post is a small exaggeration. It’s word for word the title of the Metro article, which I think sensationalizes Nigel’s reaction. Read the piece and judge for yourself.

Nigel Farage has turned on ally Donald Trump following the US airstrikes in Syria.

Overnight, the President approved the launch of 60 US Tomahawk missiles, which hit the Shayrat air base in south east Homs.

Trump’s attack was in response to a chemical attack earlier this week in which killed at least 72 people and injured many more.

Sources on the ground including humanitarian organisations and US and Russian forces claim the Syrian government are behind the suspected sarin nerve agent attack, though associates of Assad have denied the allegations.

Sounding doubtful of his ally, Farage has said he thinks Trump’s actions will leave his supporters confused.

The former Ukip leader said: ‘I am very surprised by this. I think a lot of Trump voters will be waking up this morning and scratching their heads and saying “where will it all end?”

‘As a firm Trump supporter, I say, yes, the pictures were horrible, but I’m surprised. Whatever Assad’s sins, he is secular.’

Farage also urged Britain not to get involved in any further strikes.

He added: ‘Previous interventions in the Middle East have made things worse rather than better.’

Trump’s airstrikes in Syria have put considerable strain on US and Russain relations.

President Vladimir Putin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov called the attack ‘aggression against a sovereign state in violation of international law’.

The Russian Foreign Ministry said that Moscow is suspending the memorandum with the US to prevent incidents and ensure flight safety.

If you start seriously looking around at the Twitter accounts and other websites that are frequented by Trump supporters, you’ll find a similar or even stronger backlash against Trump’s military action in Syria.

Stefan Molyneaux expresses skepticism about Trump’s actions.

Video: Weev Defends Trump

The legendary Weev takes 7 minutes out of his life in exile to advise former Trump supporters to chill.

From the youtube information box:

Published on Apr 7, 2017

just chill for a minute seriously what is wrong with you people, you’re acting like 40 year old childless single women here

Some comments on the defense of Trump:

It’s sad to see all the Trumpenproles throwing him to the wolves, despite the fact that he told the Russians (and that means they told the Syrians) that he would be doing this. Best case scenario: He did it to misdirect the hysterical warmongers in the media and the deep state, nipping the hysteria in the bud, while also taking Putin’s temperature to see what he would do.

Weev is such a Jew. He looks like Alan Ginsberg…and now he is defending attacking Assad! Sorry but we love Assad, we put up with Trump. And don’t worry Weev, if u wanna defend creating Greater Israel for your tribe, you will be doing it all alone. Assad is our red line.

kek, weev is now the voice of reason. I’m still pretty blackpilled though 😦

My defense for freaking out on social media is that i see it as a strategic thing. We are signalling to the White House that we don’t want another war. Everyone should pretend to overreact just a little bit. There is nothing wrong with showing the world, and Trump, where we stand in all of this. The bombings could turn out to be an insignificant event, but we should always take every opportunity to signal against wars for Israel.

This is Alt-Right virtue signalling and i think it’s goddamn beautiful fam.

As you can see the commenters disagree, but anyone who follows Weev knows the score.

So, what’s next?

The big headline on Drudge is the Russian warship steaming toward Syria. Big deal! Warships are always steaming to someplace. Read more on that story at Fox News

Learn more about Weev at Wikipedia.