70 Year Old White Male Home Depot Worker Fired for Confronting Shoplifters

JIM TINNEY OF TEXAS. “YOU’RE FIRED!”

Many of the shoplifters in Texas these days are Mexicans. They do construction work and don’t want to pay for their tools.

They are also often in the U.S. illegally.

Most of them are nonviolent, so company policy regarding Mexican and white shoplifters is a little ridiculous. Blacks are a different story.

Am I wrong to suggest that Jim put no one’s safety at risk by trying to slow down the shoplifters he spotted?

New York Post

A 70-year-old veteran lost his Home Depot job in Texas after confronting three shoplifters trying to steal thousands of dollars’ worth of tools from the store.

Jim Tinney said he acted instinctually when he threw a paint roller extension at the feet of one of the three suspects in an effort to stop them from making off with tool sets last month at the Pearland store, KTRK reports.

“In the Army, they train you to do things like that,” Tinney told the station. “I just automatically went like this and threw the stick at their feet.”

The suspects dodged the obstacle and got away.

About two weeks later, Tinney, who thought the incident was behind him, learned that his altruistic actions would cost him his job. Tinney admitted to the station that company representatives were clear during training sessions not to confront suspected shoplifters.

Tinney said he understood the policy, but still thinks the punishment doesn’t fit the crime.

“I think they could have written me up, reprimanded me, but terminate me? That’s pretty strong,” he told the ABC affiliate. “I’m 70 years old. I need to work. I needed that job. I enjoyed working with customers figuring out what they wanted to do. It’s fun.”

Stephen Holmes, a Home Depot spokesman, said the policy is in place to protect employees and customers alike.

“What I can tell you now is that we have a strict policy that only our trained security personnel can pursue and engage shoplifters,” Holmes told the station in a statement. “We’ve had deaths and serious injury over the years, and no amount of merchandise is more important that the safety of our associates and customers.”

Holmes referenced previous incidents during which employees were bitten, stabbed and suffered serious brain damage following encounters with suspected shoplifters.

“In fact, in just the past 24 hours we’ve had two shoplifters pull guns at two different stores at both ends of the country,” Holmes’ statement continued. “So you can see, it’s a very serious safety risk to everyone, even when it doesn’t appear to be.”

Texas is a state that favors employers. Jim has no good legal grounds to use to protest his firing. Perhaps a small business owner who wants a conscientious older white male who can get the job done will hire him now.

One question though. Is the economy so bad that a 70 year old must still work to make ends meet? SAD!

Domestic Violence Case Against African Immigrant Dropped for ‘cultural incompetence’

AUGUSTIN BAHATI. ENRICHING AMERICA ONE PUNCH AT A TIME

You can’t hold an African ape to the same standards as the white man in a court of law. To do so would be racist. Cultural incompetency is the new wrinkle in defense. Liberals have to love this new legal doctrine.

Union Leader

MANCHESTER – A Congolese immigrant escaped prosecution on six domestic-violence crimes when his lawyer convinced a city prosecutor that he lacked the cultural competency to participate in the American justice system, according to court and public records reviewed by the New Hampshire Union Leader.

Continue reading

San Francisco: BART Withholding Surveillance Videos Of Crime To Avoid ‘Stereotypes’

This is what happens when your government doesn’t give a damn about you, white man.

Isn’t it time for a new government, one that loves white people?

San Franciso is going to be stuck with a billion dollar transportation system that everyone is too afraid to use.

CBS Local San Francisco

SAN FRANCISCO (KPIX) — In the last three months, there have been at least three robberies on BART involving groups of teenagers.

“I think people are genuinely concerned — they are fearful about the stories that have come out about the recent attacks, the assaults, the thefts,” said Debora Allen, who is a member of the BART Board of Directors.

April 22: Forty to sixty kids boarded a train at the Coliseum stop and robbed seven passengers, beating up two;

June 28: A group of four kids assaulted a passenger and made off with a cell phone at Dublin; and

June 30: A woman on a train with about a dozen teenagers had her phone snatched by one them before the group got off at the Coliseum stop. Thankfully, a good Samaritan was on hand to retrieve the phone.

So far, BART has refused to turn over surveillance video for any of these incidents.

Allen told us the agency issued an explanation for why it is being tight-lipped about the thefts.

“To release these videos would create a high level of racially insensitive commentary toward the district,” she was told. “And in addition it would create a racial bias in the riders against minorities on the trains.”

According to a memo distributed to BART Directors, the agency won’t do a press release on the June 30 theft because it was a “petty crime” that would make BART look “crime ridden.” Furthermore, it would “unfairly affect and characterize riders of color, leading to sweeping generalizations in media reports.”

The memo was from BART Assistant General Manager Kerry Hamill.

Allen emailed Hamill, “I don’t understand what role the color of one’s skin plays in this issue [of whether to divulge information]. Can you explain?” Hamill responded, “If we were to regularly feed the news media video of crimes on our system that involve minority suspects, particularly when they are minors, we would certainly face questions as to why we were sensationalizing relatively minor crimes and perpetuating false stereotypes in the process.” And added her opinion of the media: “My view is that the media’s real interest in the videos of youth phone snatching incidents isn’t the desire for transparency but rather the pursuit of ratings. They know that video of these events will drive clicks to their websites and viewers to their programs because people are motivated by fear.”

Allen says scared passengers aren’t being unreasonable — being on a BART train is a vulnerable position.

“This is BART, people are sort of trapped in this train for awhile and they have a right to see what could potentially happen.”

She says all this raises questions, “What is the priority of BART? Is the safety of the passenger — of all passengers — is that a lesser priority than the race bias issue?”

According to BART spokesman Taylor Huckaby, state law protecting “juvenile police records” prevents them from showing the surveillance video, even though at least one of the people arrested for the April 22 attack is 19 years old. (He cited Cal. Gov’t Code 827.9) And, even if the faces of juveniles were blurred, Huckaby says watching the videos would be pointless gawking.

Australia: The Madness Continues–Women and Children Must Accept Being Raped

THE NEW FACE OF AUSTRALIA.

Muslims, many of them black, are allegedly causing a lot of trouble for the white Christian population.

Australians can’t easily own a gun or else many of these problems would go away. Maybe they should learn how to make do with other weapons.

Zerohedge

“While terrorism’s origins have many factors, Islamic terrorists, as heinous as their acts are, they are often merely doing what the scriptures are telling them.” — Tanveer Ahmed, Muslim psychiatrist.

In Australia, according to judges, women and children must accept sexual assaults because it is part of the “Islamic culture” of their attackers. It would seem that in parts of Australia, this “Islamic culture” has replaced the rule of law. None of the above, however, seems to be enough to appease Muslim sentiments. In March, Anne Aly, Australia’s first female Muslim MP, said that racial-discrimination laws should be expanded to cover insults based on religion as well.

In March, a teacher at Punchbowl Primary School quit her job after she and her family received death threats from the children in the school, with some of them saying they would behead her. The teacher’s complaints to the New South Wales Department of Education were dismissed.

During the month of Ramadan alone, the world witnessed 160 Islamic attacks [5] in 29 countries, in which 1627 people were murdered and 1824 injured. Nevertheless, the dual efforts to deny any links between Islamic terrorism and Islam on the one hand, and the efforts to accommodate Islam to the greatest extent possible on the other, seem to continue unaffected by the realities of Islamic terrorism — in Australia, as well, which is experiencing its own share of sharia and jihad [6].

At the end of May, the Public Health Association of Australia (PHAA) called [7] on the Australian Parliament’s Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade to:

“…include a recommendation in its report that disavows the notion that there is any inherent link between Islam and terrorism… The Committee should condemn any politician who refers divisively (expressly or implied) to any religious or ethnic group for the purpose of political gain.”

A MEMBER OF THE RESISTANCE.

YOUNGER RESISTERS.

PHAA Chief Executive Michael Moore said [7] that there is no inherent link between any religion and acts of terror:

“When you look at terrorism and the IRA, I don’t think many people blamed Christianity for terrorism when clearly there was an overlay. In fact there’s nothing ­inherent in Christianity that links to terrorism”.

Continue reading

Open Borders Advocate George Clooney Moving Family Back to Trump’s America for ‘Security Reasons’

Washed up celebrity George Clooney has served his (((globalist))) masters well over the years. He advocates for more Muslims and Africans to enter Europe. His voice is heard because of his celebrity and his marriage to Amal Clooney, a dark Muslim woman (her mother is a Sunni Muslim) who is a noted pro-open borders advocate for the West.

As far as I’m concerned George Clooney is a phony, trapped in a fake marriage intended to promote interracial mating by white men to dark brown Muslim women. It’s also reasonable to suspect that the children from the marriage are not his or even hers. There may be a fake pregnancy and birth mixed into the story.

Clooney has surely been promised some career benefit for engaging in a phony marriage. Only a homosexual in the closet would do something like that. Or a man who sold his soul to the devil.

In light of all of George and Amal’s liberal activism, the news that they are moving back to the States is intriguing.

Something’s up.

I can’t figure out exactly what, but they are not leaving Europe out of some vague fear for their safety. A truly wild guess would have Clooney “assassinated” in a psyop intended to advance the globalist agenda. Following his “death” Clooney would be given a new identity and enormous wealth and privacy. Hollywood could then mobilize to ban guns or some such. People might buy the whole rotten scheme.

Let’s see what Clooney has to say about the big move.

Breitbart

Actor and immigration activist George Clooney will move to Los Angeles with his wife Amal and newborn twins Ella and Alexander due to security concerns at his England estate, according to a report.

Life & Style magazine reported last week that the 56-year-old Oscar-winner will move his newly-expanded family to his mansion in Studio City, California, after deeming his 17th century mansion in Sonning, England to be not sufficiently safe for them.

“As soon as Amal found out she was pregnant, he hired former Secret Service agents to assess all his properties and make recommendations for improvement,” an unnamed Clooney “insider” told the magazine. “His mansion in Studio City [Calif.] was deemed the most secure, and it’s within minutes of an LAPD station.”

The insider added that the actor has received “serious” threats against his safety in recent years, as has his wife Amal, whose has in the past called for terrorist groups including ISIS to be prosecuted as part of her work as an international human rights attorney.

“He doesn’t feel like Amal and the twins are safe living in the English countryside,” the source told Life & Style. “He’s determined to move his family to LA, where he feels much more secure.”

The report comes as England has been rocked by terrorist attacks in recent months, including the terrorist bombing of a concert by pop singer Ariana Grande in Manchester in June that claimed the lives of 22 people, many of them young children.

In May, British government officials disclosed that 23,000 known jihadi terrorists are believed to be residing in Britain, far more than the 3,000 that had initially been reported.

I’d be willing to bet that the crime rate in rural Britain is significantly lower than in Los Angeles. If Clooney were truly concerned for safety, he could easily afford to move to Switzerland, which would offer maximum security.

He may simply be a dimwit, but it’s hard to shake the feeling that some big news will be breaking around the Clooney family in the next few months.

Poll: Majority of voters back Trump travel ban

The question any reasonable person might ask after reading the results of a poll questioning support for President Donald Trump’s travel ban is who the hell could be opposed to greater public safety.

Muslims would in general be opposed to the travel ban, but it’s mind-boggling to think of white people or even black people being opposed.

The social justice warrior virtue-signaling rot runs pretty wide in America. The self-loathing, perhaps mentally disturbed libtard, is as bad as the cockroach and just as hard to get rid of.

While the majority may be for the ban, the nays are a pretty sizable minority. Support should be at the 90 percent level.

Politico

A clear majority of voters support President Donald Trump’s travel ban on visitors from six predominantly Muslim countries, according to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll.

Polling on the travel restrictions has varied wildly since the Trump administrationunveiled the first executive order on travel in late January. But after months of litigation and controversy, 6-in-10 voters back the ban — and the survey suggests the actual policy may be more popular when separated from the president.

Asked whether they support or oppose the State Department’s “new guidelines which say visa applicants from six predominately Muslim countries must prove a close family relationship with a U.S. resident in order to enter the country,” 60 percent of respondents said they support the guidelines, and only 28 percent oppose them.

The POLITICO/Morning Consult question doesn’t mention Trump, nor does it refer to the president’s executive orders on immigration. That contrasts with other polls, which mostly show greater opposition to the policy. An Associated Press-NORC Center poll last month showed a 57 percent majority of Americans thought courts were acting rightly in blocking the travel ban. That was conducted before the Supreme Court’s per curiam decision last week to let some elements of the ban go into effect while the high court waits to hear the case in the fall.

Republicans overwhelmingly back the restrictions, the poll shows. Eighty-four percent of GOP respondents support the ban, while 9 percent oppose it. But the policy is also popular among independent respondents: 56 percent support it, compared with 30 percent who oppose it. Democrats tilt slightly against the ban, with 41 percent supporting it, and 46 percent in opposition.

The wording of the poll question in the new survey differs from that in a March poll, after Trump signed a revised executive order in an effort to comply with lower-court rulings against the initial ban. In March, respondents were asked whether they “approve or disapprove of a revised executive order that prohibits persons from six predominantly Muslim countries without visas from entering the United States for 90 days and halting the processing of refugees for 120 days.” Then, 56 percent of voters approved of the order, and 33 percent disapproved.

Keep the jihadist out! Keep the jihadist sympathesizers out too.

While we’re at it, we might as well keep virually all Muslims out of the U.S., or rename ourselves Amurkistan.

Women’s Mag (((Editor))) Urges Readers to Break Mail Law and Send Trump Their Used Tampons

LEA GOLDMAN, EDITOR, MARIE CLAIRE MAGAZINE.

Lea Goldman wears several hats, including leadership roles on Lifetime TV networks, Marie Claire magazine, and more.

She’s a nasty piece of work.

Excerpt from Downtrend

INSANE LIFETIME EDITOR ENCOURAGES WOMEN TO SEND BLOODY TAMPONS TO TRUMP

Feminists are currently in an uproar because of the silly feud between MSNBC dingbat Mika Brzezinski and Donald Trump. The president hit back at her childish antics by saying he saw her bleeding badly from a facelift. This comes after feminists were outraged that Trump once said Megyn Kelly had blood coming out of her eyes and her “whatever.”

In response to these nothing statements, the editor-in-chief of Lifetime and FYI, Lea Goldman, tweeted out this:

Trump’s kryptonite is women’s blood! So send your boxes of pads & tampons to the White House! #RedResistance

— Lea Goldman (@lea) June 30, 2017

Downtrend goes on to inform women that sending body waste through the mail is a federal crime, unless the conditions for shipping biomaterials are met.

Goldman incited her followers to break a federal law. That may be why I couldn’t find the Tweet. She’s apparently deleted it.

Nothing the leftist/feminist cabal has tried has derailed the Trump train. These morally bankrupt fools keep showing the world what jackasses they are, which only helps insure that they are denied power for a long time to come.

Here’s Styx opining on Lea Goldman for six and half minutes. Styx suggest the Secret Service pay Goldman a visit.

This is actual feminist “art.” What’s wrong with these kikes?

Read more about this particular feminist abomination at the moistsomoist blog.