New U.S. Navy aircraft carrier sets sail with no urinals

I think if I were shipboard, I’d pee standing up by taking aim into the ocean.

New York Daily News

The USS Gerald R. Ford — the newest U.S. Navy aircraft carrier, and the first in its class of ships — is ditching urinals, introducing “gender neutral” bathrooms.

Each sleeping quarter — what the Navy calls a berthing area — will have traditional porcelain bowls in the heads (or bathrooms) of the newly designed aircraft carrier, which can hold over 5,000 sailors.

With universal bathrooms, switching the room assignments for each berth between the genders will be much easier.

“This is designed to give the ship flexibility because there aren’t any berthing areas that are dedicated to one sex or the other,” Operations Specialist 1st Class Kaylea Motsenbocker told Navy Times recently.

However, most bathroom specialists think traditional restrooms are way less efficient. Bathroom experts told the Navy Times that urinals cost less, take up less space, and are more sanitary (fewer men miss their target with a urinal).

The Ford is the first new class of aircraft carriers designed in 40 years, making urinal-free ships the wave of the future, meeting the increasing number of women joining the Navy. In fact, it was under actual President Ford in 1976 that women were first allowed to join the Naval Academy. 81 of the 1,300 inductees that year were women — just 6%. 2016’s class, on the other hand, had 24%, just above the average 18% female population of the Navy overall.

With these numbers, it looks like urinal-free ships are here to stay, so brush up on your target practice, gentlemen sailors.

Booths are a great place to have sex. Are there going to be lube dispensers in each booth to facilitate the hanky panky?

Since booths take up more space than urinals, we have to ask if the space utilization on the new ship is optimal. It would be easier to issue women those funnels that allow them to pee standing up at a urinal.

Cucked British Fool Invites Jihadists to Cut His Throat so He Can Die Happy

My reply may get me banned from Twitter. Oh well:

Your life insurance company needs to cancel your policy. You’re too stupid to live much longer.

I don’t know, is Godfrey Elfwick a “sh*tposter?”

The Age of Shitlords thinks so. I guess I got taken in.

A Handy Guide to Avoiding Hate Speech

Originally posted by @JBurtonXP on Twitter.

Jew Sex Slave Holder Called His 7-to-11-Year-Old Victims His “Wives”


The story of the man with multiple child “wives” broke just about a year ago. Today, the trial is underway.

Only a few alternative news outlets have made it clear that Lee Kaplan is not a white man or some sort of Christian offshoot weirdo, but rather he’s a Jew, whose Talmud approves of adult-child sex.

It really needs to be made clear to people who follow the news that Kaplan is not Amish, Mormon, or any other alleged Christian cult.

He’s a Jew and we should identify him as such whenever we can.

The Independent

A paedophile brainwashed a former Amish couple into regarding him as a prophet and ‘gifting’ him their six young daughters as child wives, a court heard.

Lee Kaplan, 52, convinced Savilla and Daniel Stoltzfus that his relationships with their six daughters were the will of God, who contacted him in his dreams, the court was told.

The first daughter to be “gifted” to Kaplan, it was claimed, was given as a future wife when she was nine years old.

Her older sister testified that she too was molested by Kaplan, the abuse allegedly starting when she was ten and leading to her becoming pregnant by him aged 14 in 2013.

Ms Stoltzfus, 43, also went to live with the accused, Bucks County Court in Pennsylvania heard, and allegedly ended up complaining to her husband that Kaplan had stopped having sex with her, preferring intercourse with her daughters.


Continue reading

Scottish Nationalist Man Arrested for “Racist” Anti-English Statements Following Manchester Bombing

There is no solidarity among white people.

That’s a huge problem.

Whites should be universally condeming Islam and Muslims for the Manchester bombing on Monday night. But old Alister Craigie allegedly prefers to say that the English who died there deserved it.

Apparently, British law doesn’t allow for Craigie’s mugshot to be published. After poking around on an image search, I found this photo, which I believe to be Craigie.

Even if Craigie wrote the things he’s accused of, they are only words. Speech should be protected from prosecution by the government.

A man has been charged with posting racist messages about English people following the Manchester bombing.

Alister Craigie, 59, of Stobswell, was arrested and charged by police for allegedly making offensive remarks in the wake of Monday’s tragedy – which saw 22 people killed by suicide bomber Salman Abedi.

Craigie allegedly took to social media just hours after the atrocity to make comments about the victims.

He also reportedly responded to questions from other people to say that people at a concert deserved to die if they were English.

He appeared at Dundee Sheriff Court to face a charge of sending racist, abusive and offensive comments in relation to the bombing.

Prosecutors claim that Craigie’s messages were ‘grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character’ and were sent on Monday and Tuesday.

The charge also states that Craigie’s messages were racially-aggravated.

He pleaded not guilty to the charge and will appear in court again in August – with a trial due to begin in September.

A police spokesman said: ‘Police Scotland can confirm that a 59-year-old man from the Stobswell area was arrested and charged with communications offences relating to abusive comments on Facebook.

‘He appeared at Dundee Sheriff Court yesterday.’

Many of the victims of Monday’s blast, as people left an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester Arena, were children.

They included Scottish schoolgirl Eilidh MacLeod, 14, from Barra in the Outer Hebrides.

Family of Manchester terror victim warns government to ‘open its eyes’ before it’s too late


Victim Georgina’s parents have released a statement that says in coded language what everyone knows: Either recognize that Muslims are incompatible with life in Britain or expect many more dead teens and children in the future.

The family of Georgina Callander, who tragically died in the Manchester bombing, has warned the government it must ‘open its eyes’ before more parents lose their children to terror.

The 18-year-old was killed in the blast shortly before her favourite artist, Ariana Grande, left the stage at Manchester Arena on Monday night.

In a statement released through Greater Manchester Police, the family said Georgina’s life had been cut short by ‘evil, evil men prepared to ruin lives and destroy families’.

‘I wish I could say that Georgina is one of the last to die in this way but unless our Government opens its eyes we know we are only another in a long line of parents on a list that continues to grow,’ the statement added.

The teenager, from Chorley, was in her second year of studying health and social care at Runshaw College in Leyland, Lancashire, and had previously been a pupil at Bishop Rawstorne Church of England Academy.

She had also recently passed her driving test, was ‘doing great’ in her exams, and had been accepted into Edge Hill University.

‘Here was a girl who was loving life,’ the family said.

The statement continued: ‘On the 22 May 2017 our lives changed forever as our amazing daughter Georgina Bethany Callander was senselessly taken away.

‘Her life was taken away after 18 short years by evil, evil men prepared to ruin lives and destroy families, for what?

‘Georgina was as beautiful on the inside as she was on the outside, with a smile that was never ending.

‘She always had big hugs for everyone and her life was blooming like the flowers she loved.’

The family also paid tribute to the ‘wonderful police and rescue services’ and thanked the public for their support.

We wish the statment were stronger in terms of naming Islam and Muslims directly, but the control that Muslims exhibit over the British government makes that impossible.

We who have even half a brain get what the family is saying.

The problem is that the family’s plea is going to be ignored by the multiculturalist traitors who stifle honest speech.

HuffPo Unloads on Tucker Carlson

HuffPo title: Tucker Carlson Thinks Moonlight’s Best Picture Win Was Because Of ‘Affirmative Action’

Tucker Carlson is getting under their skin. They’re triggered!!!

Snark disguised as news from HuffPo. Ugh!

Excerpt from the Huffington Post

Don’t worry everyone Tucker has it covered.

You know Tucker Carlson right? The guy Jon Stewart once obliterated on CNN for the world to see? Yes, the guy with the fifth grader’s haircut who admitted to not watching the Oscar-nominated movie “Moonlight,” and now is here to tell us why “Moonlight” really won best picture at the Academy Awards. Drum roll please: Because it was a “foregone conclusion.” Of course. Why else would an all black cast, with black directors, focusing on the journey of a marginalized member of society win an award? On merit? Merit smerit.

Carlson believes that the “political implications” of the feature, which boasts some of the most promising young actors in the industry, was the only reason it won best picture. Alright, Tuck, for the sake of the debate, I will humor you. What exactly do you think was “political” about “Moonlight?” Did they discuss policy? Government? Congress? The president? Maybe I missed it. Or maybe is it that the only way your brain could fathom a movie about a black, gay man, made by a predominately black creative team, and black directors, taking home the ultimate prize, is to deem it a fix, a foregone conclusion? Or maybe it’s that to Tucker a movie about a black, gay character is inherently political whereas a movie about a white, straight character is not. Merely by pointing a camera at a black, gay man, Tucker believes you are automatically making a political statement. So by his definition, since Hollywood isn’t supposed to make political statements, Hollywood shouldn’t tell the stories of black, gay men. Or other marginalized communities, I guess.

At first glance, Tucker comes across as yet another shallow Fox mouthpiece advocating for celebrities remaining separate from political issues and politics in general remaining separate from Art, whilst spending 30 minutes of his valuable Monday morning, talking about politics and….Art. But look closer and Carlson’s point of view reiterates the still all-too-prominent inherent conservative perception that black and queer experiences exist outside the norm. They only exist in the realm of politics, whenever “others” try to assert themselves and be heard. They aren’t mainstream or deserving of equal attention but instead are granted an award just to appease Hollywood’s need to moralize.

Now if that wasn’t ridiculous enough, Carlson also went on to contradict his already contradictory statement by saying the feature ‘had to win because we knew what the film was about, that’s part of the problem with Hollywood…That’s the law, there is no way around it”.

As regular commenter Robert sometimes reminds us, Alfred Hitchcock, the greatest filmmaker of all time, never won an Oscar. At least since Marlon Brando sent a fake Indian to the stage to accept his award because he was protesting something, the Oscars have been political. To deny that is to deny plain fact.

Last year, blacks made a big fuss about how “white” the Oscars were (really Jewish, but to blacks, Jews are white). So, this year, in an effort to stick it to Trump’s “deplorables,” Hollyweird went all out to protest our existence and our values.

They hate Tuck because he speaks truth.