Hulk Hogan, former pro wrestler, sued Gawker for publishing part of a sex tape that featured him with a friend’s wife. The tape also showed Hogan using a taboo racial slur, which ended his career in wrestling. Hogan claimed his privacy was violated by Gawker.
Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the Hulk Hogan verdict, announced less than an hour ago as these words are being written, is that the jury hearing the case didn’t hold Hulk Hogan’s taboo language against him. He objected to his daughter’s sexual relationship with a Negro and used the word “nigger” several times during a break from the sex he had with a friend’s wife.
Remember that Hulk was fired from the WWE for his use of that taboo word. Also remember that in America today you can be any kind of degenerate or pervert, but by god, you’d better not be a racist. Yet Hogan still prevailed with a jury.
A Florida jury today ordered Gawker Media to pay $115 million for publishing a sex tape showing Terry Bollea, also known as Hulk Hogan, having sex with his friend’s wife.
The stunning sum, which may have punitive damages added to it, is a life-threatening event for the New York-based network of news and gossip sites. Gawker media was one of the first successful, large digital-only news companies. The final sum is even more than the $100 million Bollea was seeking. Bollea also sued Gawker founder Nick Denton and former editor Albert Daulerio, and the jury found those two men personally liable as well.
The fact that the primary focus in this sex tape was a man rather than a woman doesn’t change my view: If you don’t want your sex tape all over the Internet, don’t make one.
However, Hulk was secretly taped without his permission. That changes things.
The sex tape was made about a decade ago, during a period in which the professional wrestler Hogan testified that he was going through a difficult phase with his then-wife. Todd Clem, a Florida radio personality who later legally changed his name to Bubba the Love Sponge, encouraged Hogan to sleep with his wife Heather.
In 2012, Bollea sued Clem, saying he didn’t know Clem had filmed him. Clem has made conflicting statements about whether Bollea knew about the taping. Clem settled the lawsuit, reportedly for $5,000. That left Gawker, Denton, and Daulerio as the targets of Bollea’s wrath. He sued them for $100 million in damages and the case when to trial in St. Petersburg, Florida on March 7.
Clem is a lowlife scumbag who got off cheap. Is he really some kind of celebrity? America is sick, my friends.
The case raises issues about the limits of the First Amendment in the digital age. Gawker argued that it had a legitimate news reason to publish the tape, since Bollea had talked about his sex life—specifically about sleeping with Clem’s wife—in numerous venues.
Bollea’s reputation took a huge hit last year, and he got fired from his job at World Wrestling Entertainment. That outcome wasn’t fallout from the Gawker article, however. In a section of the sex tape that could be described as “pillow talk” (which wasn’t published by Gawker), Bollea went on a racist diatribe. He repeatedly used the N-word and other racial insults, expressing disappointment that his daughter was in a relationship with a black man. The racial epithets were leaked by other news sites, including Radar Online and the National Enquirer.
Other news sites posted stills from the tape, but only Gawker posted video. They showed one minute and 41 seconds of the tape, which included just nine seconds of sexual content. The company says it made about $11,000 from the post, countering assertions by Bollea attorneys that it was worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.
“What’s disturbing about Gawker isn’t what they do in a vacuum,” Bollea lawyer Kenneth Turkel said during closing arguments. “It’s how proud they are of it.” Denton was “playing God over Bollea’s right to privacy,” he added.
Bollea says he still feels humiliated over the tape’s publication. Gawker editors said the publication of the tape, and accompanying essay, was a commentary about celebrity sex tapes.
“He’s talked about his sex life, how big his penis is, and when he talks about his penis it’s to promote his daughter’s singing career,” said Gawker’s attorney Michael Sullivan. “He’s discussed his sexual encounters. Now he tells you this was the Hulk Hogan character.”
Gawker has a right to publish news stories, even ones with objectionable content, Sullivan told the jury.
“If they can make a claim like this, the Internet as we know it will cease to exist,” Sullivan said.
This story is much bigger than Hulk Hogan’s dick, however big that is, but instead is about Internet (publishing) freedom. That sex tape was news. It was acquired legally, not stolen. Hogan was a public figure. His morals are relevant because he’s a role model to a certain type of retarded American.
Hulk Hogan’s beef should be with Bubba the Love Sponge, the man who secretly recorded him.
Gawker will appeal and in the interest of freedom of the press, Gawker should prevail.