Eating meat perpetuates ‘hegemonic masculinity,’ idiot feminist prof says

ANNE DELESSIO PARSON IS STANDING BETWEEN THE LADY AND GENTLEMAN OF COLOR.

Never trust a woman with a hypenated name. I’m thinking our center of attention in this post is “married” to another woman or possibly a tranny. That would be the cool thing to do.

Another cool thing to do is to write a gobbledy-gook analysis of the patriarchy, substituting opinion for logic or fact. Eating meat oppresses women and nonwhites, you see.

Lesbian Parson should try a little man meat. It might do her good.

Campus Reform

Pennsylvania State University sociology professor recently argued that eating meat perpetuates “hegemonic masculinity” and “gender hegemony.”

This is not a joke. It’s not from The Onion. I swear.

Continue reading

Woman Chopped Off Boyfriend’s Penis in Weird Sex Game

BRENDA BARATTINI. GARDEN SHEARS HER TOOL OF CHOICE.

Brenda Barattini’s defense for why she cut off Sergio’s manhood is weak. If you are sexually assaulted, as she claims, you don’t have the chance to use garden shears to snip away a private part. You run for help or you call the police. You might even stab or shoot your assailant.

Snipping is clearly an act of revenge by a crazy woman.

Brenda deserves a long prison sentence for her lack of self control.

metro.co.uk

A woman has been arrested after she allegedly cut off her boyfriend’s penis in a rage after a sex attack.

Brenda Barattini, 26, is accused of using garden shears to chop off the manhood of a man known only as Sergio F, 40.

The motive behind the attack is currently unclear with his lawyer saying it happened during a sex game while her lawyer says it was because he attacked her.

Police and ambulance crews arrived at the scene shortly after with the man taken to hospital where he is said to still be in a ‘stable condition’.

He was rushed to hospital where attempts to reattach his penis failed.

Her lawyer, Carlos Nayi, said: ‘There’s justification for what happened. The information I’ve received is that she was the victim of a sex attack.

‘She let him into her apartment because he’s someone who’s in a rock band and is an acquaintance of her brother but once inside, instead of removing a musical instrument as he was supposed to, he attacked her sexually and she assumed a defensive attitude.

Whether or not she acted excessively is for the courts to decide.’

AVOID. AVOID. AVOID. AVOID. AVOID. AVOID.

However Sergio’s lawyer Eduardo Perez denied the claim, saying: ‘I don’t understand what happened. This is someone I’ve known for some time.

This was a peaceful encounter.’

He said that Sergio F and Barattini had been seeing one another for several months adding: ‘They were in the middle of things. He wasn’t asleep. They began with a sexual game in which he was blindfolded.

‘There is evidence that was at the crime scene.’

Barattini, an architect, is facing charges of wounding following the incident on Saturday night in Nueva Cordoba, one of the most fashionable and sought-after areas of the city.

State prosecutor Bettina Croppi said the only thing she knew for sure at the moment was that the injuries that Sergio had suffered were ‘very serious.’

She admitted: ‘It’s very likely he’s lost the ability to be able to father children’ and said it had been confirmed the couple knew each other but it was not clear yet if they were in a relationship.

Barattini has yet to give a statement and will not be formally questioned until next week after her psychiatric evaluation.

Tests are also understood to have taken place to determine if she was raped or sexually attacked.

Sergio is still in intensive care in hospital.

When I looked for pictures to use for this post there were more women’s photos and severed penis stories than I could have ever guessed.

I wonder how women would like it if there were pages of pictures of men who cut off women’s breasts!

And how many women who read the story ended up laughing!!!

White Sharia Featured in Three Prominent Profiles Over Last Two Days

Newsweek, SPLC Hatewatch, and the Jewish Forward have all come out with articles on White Sharia within the last day or two. I’ve posted the Newsweek article in full, followed by an excerpt from the SPLC. The Forward offers nothing not found in the other two.

The debate around White Sharia will determine the future direction and success of White Nationalism.

Newsweek

White supremacists want to take over everything — even the thing they hate the most: Islam’s Sharia Law.

White Sharia—as coined by a former Marine blogger—is still anti-Muslim, but seizes on orthodox Islam’s ideal of obedient women and turns it into its own movement, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks hate groups.

White Sharia started as an online meme by Sacco Vandal, the ex-soldier and white supremacist, who wrote on his blog that feminists and a falling American patriarchy are resulting in men losing their “barbarity.”

Continue reading

Bionic Mosquito Explains the Postmodernist Plot to Destroy the West Better Than Anyone I’ve Seen

You’re probably familiar with Cultural Marxism, the Marxist shift toward gaining power through the destruction of traditional cultures rather than through economics.

Barack Obama is more a Cultural Marxist, allied with the Saul Alinksky school of thought, than he is a traditional Marxist/Leninist.

Postmodernism, the ruling principle in most university departments, is Cultural Marxism on steroids.

In 2005, before I was so rudely fired by the university, I was struggling to understand post modernism. I never quite got it.

This piece by Bionic Mosquito is so good that I’m putting up the whole piece rather than an excerpt in case the power elites take down his site. If the author objects, I’ll condense it, but for now, it’s all here, all 2000 words. Images are my selections.

Lew Rockwell

In listening to Jordan Peterson over the last few months, he has often commented on the destructive philosophy of post-modernism, a philosophy that – in his view – is the force behind the cultural destruction underway in the west.

Prior to hearing this from him, my knowledge on the matter went to the cultural Marxists of the Frankfurt School and, before this, Antonio Gramsci. Peterson is aware of these influences, but for him the Post-Modernists are today’s driving force.

What is meant by postmodernism?

Postmodernism is difficult to define, because to define it would violate the postmodernist’s premise that no definite terms, boundaries, or absolute truths exist.

Are nationalism, politics, religion, and war the result of a primitive human mentality? Is truth an illusion? How can Christianity claim primacy or dictate morals? The list of concerns goes on and on….

It seems both an infinite number of realities and no realities – all at the same time. No wonder it is difficult to define.

I have been thinking about this post from the first time I heard the subject mentioned by Peterson. Even setting aside the normal life that often gets in the way of writing, this has been a subject that I have had to let stew in the old noodle for a while. I offer the following as an initial foray into a subject that I do not yet understand very well.

I have found a few helpful resources on the topic and will reference two of these in this post. With this, let’s begin.

Explaining Postmodernism: Skepticism and Socialism from Rousseau to Foucault, by Stephen R. C. Hicks, a book review by David Gordon

A more thorough definition and explanation of this philosophy:

…Hicks tells us exactly what he means by postmodernism: “Metaphysically, postmodernism is anti-realist, holding that it is impossible to speak meaningfully about an independently existing reality. Postmodernism substitutes instead a social-linguistic, constructionist account of reality. Epistemologically, having rejected the notion of an independently existing reality, postmodernism denies that reason or any other method is a means of acquiring direct knowledge of that reality. . . . Postmodern accounts of human nature are consistently collectivist, holding that individuals’ identities are constructed largely by the social-linguistic groups they are a part of . . . postmodern themes in ethics and politics are characterized by an identification with and sympathy for the groups perceived to be oppressed in the conflicts, and a willingness to enter the fray on their behalf” (emphasis in original).

THIS COMIC MOCKS POSTMODERNISM.

Continue reading

Tucker: PA Professor Blames ‘Toxic Masculinity’ for Texas Church Shooting

PROFESSOR COLLEEN CLEMONS. FINALLY, AN ATTRACTIVE FEMINIST.

OK, here’s how the Marxists, trained in the Saul Alinksy methods, work their smear jobs.

For one thing, it takes a catchy phrase to get people’s attention. It’s best if the phrase conveys a negative image in people’s minds.

Colleen uses the phrase “TOXIC MASCULINITY.”

I’m sure that she didn’t coin the phrase, but it’s a good one for propaganda purposes.

Let’s see how she uses that phrase to slander men, then we’ll get back to the Alinksy strategy that’s at work here.

Fox News Insider

The director of women’s and gender studies at a Pennsylvania university claimed “toxic masculinity” is “killing everyone” and blamed the phenomenon for the Texas church shooting.

Professor Colleen Clemens at Kutztown University in Berks County, Pa. tweeted that “Toxic Masculinity is killing everyone – repeat – toxic masculinity is killing everyone – repeat.”

Tucker Carlson said he asked Clemens to come on his program to discuss her accusations, but that the woman replied that she “feared for her safety.”

AFRAID FOR HER SAFETY OR AFRAID OF TUCKER’S RIDICULE?

Catalina Magazine publisher Cathy Areu told Carlson that “toxic masculinity” is a real phenomenon, as men commit more violent crimes than women.

Toxic masculinity is killing everyone. REPEAT. Toxic masculinity is killing everyone. REPEAT. Toxic masculinity is killing everyone. REPEAT. https://t.co/WFhAdphE14

— Colleen Clemens (@clutzclemens) November 6, 2017
Clemens’ initial tweet linked to a WPVI news story reporting that President Trump said the shooting was not a “gun [control] situation”

She later tweeted that “ad hominem attacks are petty and useless. Engage with my ideas? All for it. Trolls need not apply.”

Ad hominem attacks are petty and useless. Engage with my ideas? All for it. Trolls need not apply. Feel free to continue making assumptions about me. But in the meantime, I will be teaching while you sit around tweeting. SAD!

— Colleen Clemens (@clutzclemens) November 8, 2017
“Feel free to continue making assumptions about me. But in the meantime, I will be teaching while you sit around tweeting. SAD!” Clemens tweeted.

Obnoxious Cathy Areu showed up at Tucker’s request to discuss the “toxic masculinity” claim.

When a Marxist professor wants to target a group, say men, then the professor must find something negative about men to bitch about. In this case, men commit more mass murders than women. Thus, the claim:

“Toxic masculinity is killing everyone.”

So some vague concept is the killer, not specific individuals. And that vague concept is killing “everyone.”

Hyperbole? Much!

Obviously, muh cute prof doesn’t like masculinity, or at least she thinks she doesn’t like it.

Most men never commit murder. Most masculine men never kill either. Let’s say Donald Trump, Arnold Schwazenegger, and Chuck Norris are masculine men. Agree?

They and millions of other masculine men never kill. The onus is thus on muh prof to prove her thesis.

Since blacks commit murder far out of proportion to their numbers in the population, do you think that Colleen would ever talk about “toxic black masculinity?”

I don’t think so because then her Marxist friends would label her as a racist.

One more thing. Men were certainly freer to express their masculinity in the 1950s than today, yet mass shootings never happened that I can recall.

What changed?

Lots of things, including the indoctrination of women into the man-hating cult of feminism.

It’s too bad about Colleen. In a different world, she would have made some man a nice wife.

Hillary: White Women Who Voted Against Her Pressured by Brothers, Fathers

HILLARY SEZ SHE WUZ ROBBED.

So much failure, so many explanations.

Daily Caller

Hillary Clinton has an explanation for why women — white women, in particular — voted against her last November: they caved in to pressure from their husbands, fathers, boyfriends and male bosses.

Clinton made the excuse during an interview with NPR’s Rachel Martin during a promotional tour of her book, “What Happened.”

In the interview, Clinton was asked why, given that she was the first female presidential candidate, she fared worse than expected among female voters.

In typical Clinton fashion, she deflected the blame, suggesting that women who voted against her were somehow manipulated by men in their lives. She also claimed that “sexism” from supporters of Bernie Sanders might have played a part in her poor showing among female voters.

“You yourself in the book acknowledge that a good number of young women didn’t vote for you, which is presumably not a sexist choice. They just weren’t inspired by your message,” NPR’s Martin said to Clinton.

THEY DON’T LOOK BULLIED TO ME.

Viking Warrior Remains Found in Sweden Shown to Be FEMALE

Surely, it’s not a shock to discover that there was at least one female Viking warrior. If only that warrior spirit could be reborn in today’s males and females descended from the warrior race.

MSN

Scientists have confirmed that human remains interred in a prominent Viking warrior grave in Sweden were those of a woman and not a man, a discovery that raises provocative questions about gender roles and limitations in the male-dominated ancient society.

The woman’s remains were entombed in a “well-furnished” grave in the Viking-age town of Birka and were excavated in the 1880s, but it was only through DNA testing that her sex was determined, according to findings published Friday in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology.

Not only was she a warrior, but the grave suggests she was a high-ranking one. Along with her remains, archaeologists found a sword, an ax, a spear, armor-piercing arrows, a bottle knife, two shields and two horses – the complete equipment of a professional warrior. Furthermore, a full set of gaming pieces with the remains implied she had knowledge of tactics and strategy and confirmed her role as a high-ranking officer, the findings state.

“Aside from the complete warrior equipment buried along with her… she had a board game in her lap, or more of a war-planning game used to try out battle tactics and strategies, which indicates she was a powerful military leader. She’s most likely planned, led and taken part in battles,” Charlotte Hedenstierna-Jonson, an archaeologist at Uppsala University told The Local.

The remains had been assumed to have been those of a man because of the armor found with them. However, Anna Kjellstrom, an osteologist at Stockholm University, began studying them in 2016 and noticed feminine qualities, such as thinner cheekbones and “typically feminine” hips, according to The Local.

“This image of the male warrior in a patriarchal society was reinforced by research traditions and contemporary preconceptions. Hence, the biological sex of the individual was taken for granted,” Hedenstierna-Jonson, Kjellstrom and the eight other researchers behind the study, wrote in their report.

Hedenstierna-Jonson told The Local it was uncommon for women to hold high roles in the Viking military and the woman would have needed to have battle experience to get there. Although there had been stories of female warriors, the finding marks the first confirmation.

Hedenstierna-Jonson added that this was a “fantastic find,” but “unlikely to completely up-end historians’ view of the Viking society as being patriarchal, mainly constituting of male warriors.”