Tucker: PA Professor Blames ‘Toxic Masculinity’ for Texas Church Shooting

PROFESSOR COLLEEN CLEMONS. FINALLY, AN ATTRACTIVE FEMINIST.

OK, here’s how the Marxists, trained in the Saul Alinksy methods, work their smear jobs.

For one thing, it takes a catchy phrase to get people’s attention. It’s best if the phrase conveys a negative image in people’s minds.

Colleen uses the phrase “TOXIC MASCULINITY.”

I’m sure that she didn’t coin the phrase, but it’s a good one for propaganda purposes.

Let’s see how she uses that phrase to slander men, then we’ll get back to the Alinksy strategy that’s at work here.

Fox News Insider

The director of women’s and gender studies at a Pennsylvania university claimed “toxic masculinity” is “killing everyone” and blamed the phenomenon for the Texas church shooting.

Professor Colleen Clemens at Kutztown University in Berks County, Pa. tweeted that “Toxic Masculinity is killing everyone – repeat – toxic masculinity is killing everyone – repeat.”

Tucker Carlson said he asked Clemens to come on his program to discuss her accusations, but that the woman replied that she “feared for her safety.”

AFRAID FOR HER SAFETY OR AFRAID OF TUCKER’S RIDICULE?

Catalina Magazine publisher Cathy Areu told Carlson that “toxic masculinity” is a real phenomenon, as men commit more violent crimes than women.

Toxic masculinity is killing everyone. REPEAT. Toxic masculinity is killing everyone. REPEAT. Toxic masculinity is killing everyone. REPEAT. https://t.co/WFhAdphE14

— Colleen Clemens (@clutzclemens) November 6, 2017
Clemens’ initial tweet linked to a WPVI news story reporting that President Trump said the shooting was not a “gun [control] situation”

She later tweeted that “ad hominem attacks are petty and useless. Engage with my ideas? All for it. Trolls need not apply.”

Ad hominem attacks are petty and useless. Engage with my ideas? All for it. Trolls need not apply. Feel free to continue making assumptions about me. But in the meantime, I will be teaching while you sit around tweeting. SAD!

— Colleen Clemens (@clutzclemens) November 8, 2017
“Feel free to continue making assumptions about me. But in the meantime, I will be teaching while you sit around tweeting. SAD!” Clemens tweeted.

Obnoxious Cathy Areu showed up at Tucker’s request to discuss the “toxic masculinity” claim.

When a Marxist professor wants to target a group, say men, then the professor must find something negative about men to bitch about. In this case, men commit more mass murders than women. Thus, the claim:

“Toxic masculinity is killing everyone.”

So some vague concept is the killer, not specific individuals. And that vague concept is killing “everyone.”

Hyperbole? Much!

Obviously, muh cute prof doesn’t like masculinity, or at least she thinks she doesn’t like it.

Most men never commit murder. Most masculine men never kill either. Let’s say Donald Trump, Arnold Schwazenegger, and Chuck Norris are masculine men. Agree?

They and millions of other masculine men never kill. The onus is thus on muh prof to prove her thesis.

Since blacks commit murder far out of proportion to their numbers in the population, do you think that Colleen would ever talk about “toxic black masculinity?”

I don’t think so because then her Marxist friends would label her as a racist.

One more thing. Men were certainly freer to express their masculinity in the 1950s than today, yet mass shootings never happened that I can recall.

What changed?

Lots of things, including the indoctrination of women into the man-hating cult of feminism.

It’s too bad about Colleen. In a different world, she would have made some man a nice wife.

Hillary: White Women Who Voted Against Her Pressured by Brothers, Fathers

HILLARY SEZ SHE WUZ ROBBED.

So much failure, so many explanations.

Daily Caller

Hillary Clinton has an explanation for why women — white women, in particular — voted against her last November: they caved in to pressure from their husbands, fathers, boyfriends and male bosses.

Clinton made the excuse during an interview with NPR’s Rachel Martin during a promotional tour of her book, “What Happened.”

In the interview, Clinton was asked why, given that she was the first female presidential candidate, she fared worse than expected among female voters.

In typical Clinton fashion, she deflected the blame, suggesting that women who voted against her were somehow manipulated by men in their lives. She also claimed that “sexism” from supporters of Bernie Sanders might have played a part in her poor showing among female voters.

“You yourself in the book acknowledge that a good number of young women didn’t vote for you, which is presumably not a sexist choice. They just weren’t inspired by your message,” NPR’s Martin said to Clinton.

THEY DON’T LOOK BULLIED TO ME.

Viking Warrior Remains Found in Sweden Shown to Be FEMALE

Surely, it’s not a shock to discover that there was at least one female Viking warrior. If only that warrior spirit could be reborn in today’s males and females descended from the warrior race.

MSN

Scientists have confirmed that human remains interred in a prominent Viking warrior grave in Sweden were those of a woman and not a man, a discovery that raises provocative questions about gender roles and limitations in the male-dominated ancient society.

The woman’s remains were entombed in a “well-furnished” grave in the Viking-age town of Birka and were excavated in the 1880s, but it was only through DNA testing that her sex was determined, according to findings published Friday in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology.

Not only was she a warrior, but the grave suggests she was a high-ranking one. Along with her remains, archaeologists found a sword, an ax, a spear, armor-piercing arrows, a bottle knife, two shields and two horses – the complete equipment of a professional warrior. Furthermore, a full set of gaming pieces with the remains implied she had knowledge of tactics and strategy and confirmed her role as a high-ranking officer, the findings state.

“Aside from the complete warrior equipment buried along with her… she had a board game in her lap, or more of a war-planning game used to try out battle tactics and strategies, which indicates she was a powerful military leader. She’s most likely planned, led and taken part in battles,” Charlotte Hedenstierna-Jonson, an archaeologist at Uppsala University told The Local.

The remains had been assumed to have been those of a man because of the armor found with them. However, Anna Kjellstrom, an osteologist at Stockholm University, began studying them in 2016 and noticed feminine qualities, such as thinner cheekbones and “typically feminine” hips, according to The Local.

“This image of the male warrior in a patriarchal society was reinforced by research traditions and contemporary preconceptions. Hence, the biological sex of the individual was taken for granted,” Hedenstierna-Jonson, Kjellstrom and the eight other researchers behind the study, wrote in their report.

Hedenstierna-Jonson told The Local it was uncommon for women to hold high roles in the Viking military and the woman would have needed to have battle experience to get there. Although there had been stories of female warriors, the finding marks the first confirmation.

Hedenstierna-Jonson added that this was a “fantastic find,” but “unlikely to completely up-end historians’ view of the Viking society as being patriarchal, mainly constituting of male warriors.”

Cultural Marxism Taking Over Conservatism

Richard Spencer’s mentor, Paul Gottfried, analyzes the roots of Cultural Marxism and why conservatives buy into gay rights, gay marriage, and political correctness about race, religion, etc.

Like you, I’ve read plenty about Cultural Marxism. Professor Gottfried offers some new insights in this piece.

Excerpt from UNZ

The most recent of incident of Cultural Marxist commissars refusing to admit that dissidents are to be treated as fellow citizens is the crazed female professor who accosted the NPI’s Richard Spencer while he was exercising at a Alexandria gym. She, recognizing him from coverage of the election campaign, started haranguing him and calling him a “Nazi.”

Instead of having her ejected for this behavior, the gym’s management terminated Spencer’s membership. [Georgetown professor confronts white nationalist Richard Spencer at the gym — which terminates his membership , By Faiz Siddiqui May 21, 2017]

Back in 2011 VDARE posted a commentary of mine on the legitimacy of the “Cultural Marxist” concept. (I reluctantly accepted the term only because I couldn’t think of a better one.)

As I pointed out, this ideology was very far from orthodox Marxism and was viewed by serious Marxists as a kind of bastard child. Yet many of those designated as “Cultural Marxists” still viewed themselves as classical Marxists and some still do.

This video explaining Cultural Marxism was published on youtube by VertigoPolitix, who sometimes comments on posts here.

Continue reading

Mother of Five Adult Children Claims the Kids are OK with Her Sugar Baby Lifestyle

As you read the story of Suzanne Thatcher’s travel adventures, ask yourself if men are really this stupid, and if they are, why.

I had sugar babies in my classes at the university, but they were young and they had sex with their sugar daddies.

Suzanne Thatcher is old and she claims not to do anything with her sugar daddies that make her feel “uncomfortable.” All of her talk about separate rooms while traveling with men who pick up the tab for her expenses leaves me shaking my head.

New York Post

Meet the mom-of-five traveling the world in style thanks to the rich men she meets online.

Suzanne Thatcher, 52, has journeyed first class to luxurious hotels in destinations across Italy and the US – all paid for by men she’s met via a dating website.

Thatcher, from Florida, said: “Men I’ve met through online dates have enabled me to see some amazing places, but I’ve also made some good friends.

“My friends laughed at first but now I’ve even persuaded some of my male friends to sign up to find travel companions themselves.”

Thatcher insists that she is honest with the men she dates from the off, making it clear that the pair will have separate rooms on their trips and that she won’t do anything she doesn’t feel comfortable with.

Continue reading

Attention Whoring Jew “Mattress Girl” Emma Sulkowicz is Back, Protesting the Patriarchy with BDSM Porn

FROM THIS AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY …

TO THIS AT AN AN ART MUSEUM.

Emma Sulkowicz, a half Jew and half gook mental case, became famous a couple of years ago for her false rape accusations against a white male student. He’s still branded a rapist even though there is strong evidence that all he did was have a one night stand or brief relationship with this sperm dumpster.

The filthy Jew whore should be serving jail time for making false rape accusations. Instead, the New York art scene worships her degeneracy.

Not everyone approves though. This Tweet mocks her:

You can watch a hard core porn video that the mental case describes as “art” here. Even if you like porn, you probably don’t want to watch.

Here’s the story on her newest project:

Broadly Vice

Two years after “Mattress Performance,” Emma Sulkowicz continues to provoke. Her most recent piece, in which she was bound, berated, and hung from the ceiling, tackles the question of the value of art under the Trump administration.

Emma Sulkowicz is a performance artist living and working in New York City, though most recognize her as the Columbia University student who made headlines her senior year in 2014. Sulkowicz, then a visual arts undergraduate, focused her thesis Mattress Performance (Carry That Weight) on hauling a dorm room twin-size mattress everywhere on campus to protest the university’s mishandling of her sexual assault complaint against a fellow student. Sulkowicz and Mattress Performance sparked a national debate about sexual assault on campus. As coverage increased, Sulkowicz—wielding a 50-pound mattress and wearing blue hair, a somber expression, and absolute resolve—became the center of a larger culture war tearing through America.

She talks about her “rape” here:

During Sulkowicz’s senior year, the community that we now know consists of the socially conservative, the alt-right, the Trump voter, and the many trolls that fall into the aforementioned categories, made Sulkowicz the symbol of what they believed to be political correctness gone berserk on campus and society at large. For many others, Sulkowicz became a hero. Here was a woman demanding accountability and justice from a society that allows and perpetrates sexual violence.

As this video notes, she asked her so-called rapist to have anal sex with her, a request he did not want to honor.

Since her graduation in May 2015—during which Columbia University president Lee Bollinger refused to shake her hand—Sulkowicz has furiously continued her work as an artist. Soon after, she released Ceci N’est Pas Un Viol, a follow-up to Mattress Performance. Then, she had her first individual gallery show in Los Angeles. For the past year, Sulkowicz has been enrolled in the Whitney Museum’s Independent Study Program (ISP) and on May 20th, graduated with a performance at the program’s studio exhibition in midtown Manhattan.

TWO JEWS ACTING OUT THEIR DEGENERACY FOR THE GOYIM.

As the performance started, this man in a suit, named Master Avery, started to berate Sulkowicz. “Your boobs are too small,” he spat. “You can’t even stand up straight.” He pulled a long, gnarled rope out of a black leather bag and started tying intricate knots around her upper thigh. Once the knots covered both of Sulkowicz’s legs, Master Avery started around her waist, moving her body as he worked quickly. At one point, the rope almost hit Sulkowicz’s eye. After a few shocked blinks, she looked up at the audience and laughed.

“We’re acting out this sadistic-masochistic relationship between the institution with all of its financial power, and this program that wants to be political but can’t be really because it’s being tied up by this institution,” Sulkowicz explained.

After what seemed like days—but was was really about 45 minutes—Master Avery had completely tied Sulkowicz up to a large wooden beam. Using a pulley system attached to the ceiling, he used his whole body to lift her from the ground, and after a few tries, Sulkowicz was suspended with her arms and legs wrapped around the beam, rendering her immobile. The rope visibly cut into her skin as Master Avery took off his belt and started hitting her with it.

In one of the responses to the Tweet below, someone actually uses the word “Jew.”

As I’ve said before and will say again, mixed race youths are usually angry and alienated. They don’t know who they are.

This one unfortunately has her group of admirers willing to indulge her insanity because it spits in the face of the “deplorables,” the Trump supporters who voted to “drain the swamp.”

Sulkowicz is a vile swamp creature we just can’t seem to get rid of. This is the sixth post on her antics I’ve posted. I hope to do one more.

When she kills herself.

War on Normal White Men: UC Berkeley Professor Fired Over Sexual Harassment Accusations

ERIN BENNETT, LEFT, KATHLEEN GUTIERREZ, CENTER.

Three women losers who are so dainty and delicate that a male flirting with them caused them to break down and lose their ability to function in school won a big victory when Professor Blake Wentworth was fired.

His flirtatious interest in three mildly attractive students who appear to be in their mid-20s has made international news for the last two years.

First the story, then some commentary.

The Guardian

The University of California has fired a professor who was accused of sexually harassing multiple students, nearly two years after campus investigators first concluded he had made unwanted advances and violated school policies.

The dismissal of assistant professor Blake Wentworth – who sued the women who filed harassment complaints against him – marks a rare instance of termination of a faculty member accused of sexual misconduct at the prestigious public university.

BLAKE WENTWORTH.

The allegations that the professor of south and south-east Asian studies at UC Berkeley sexually harassed and inappropriately touched female students he was overseeing contributed to a major scandal, sparking an international debate about sexism and discrimination in academia.

Two graduate students and one undergraduate shared their accounts with the Guardian last year, arguing that Wentworth’s mistreatment of them had derailed their studies and careers and that the university had repeatedly failed to support them and hold the faculty member accountable.

Attorneys for Wentworth – who filed a defamation suit against the three women in September and has sued the university – said in a statement on Wednesday that the university was trying to distract from an ongoing financial scandal and that he continues to deny the “false assertions, which are a pretext to discriminate and retaliate against him”.

Evidence in his pending lawsuit will show that UC embarked on a “campaign to ruin his career”, the lawyers added.

It’s unclear why the decision to terminate the professor took so long. The university substantiated the first claim of harassment against one of the graduate students in October 2015, and the three women filed formal complaints with state investigators more than a year ago.

The university concluded that Wentworth made unwelcome sexual advances against grad student Kathleen Gutierrez, who accused Wentworth of grabbing her hand and saying, “I could lose my job over this … but I’m just so attracted to you.” He also allegedly came up behind her and wrapped his hands around her head and made offensive comments about a strip club.

BENNETT AND GUTIERREZ.

Erin Bennett, the other grad student, accused Wentworth of inappropriately touching her and making comments about sex during their one-on-one independent study in her first semester at the school. The process of reporting the harassment took a toll on her mental health and led her to take a leave of absence, she said.

Wentworth, a tenure-track professor, allegedly told undergraduate student Nicole Hemenway that she was a “gorgeous young woman”, calling her “honey bear” and saying that others in the department were “jealous that such beautiful young women are always coming and going from my office”.

NICOLE HEMENWAY, UNDERGRAD, AGE 24.

More details on Mestizo Hemenway’s story reveal that Hemenway considers Wentworth to be middle-aged and that his attention to her made her skin crawl.

Victim mentality? Much!

The story also reveals that the professor’s “inappropriate touching” involved putting his hands on hers.

On Wednesday, Hemenway said that the dismissal would not have happened if the students hadn’t devoted significant resources to fighting the case.

“This firing was our doing. The university gets to put their name on the decision, but they were perfectly happy not doing anything,” she said by phone. “This was because of student organizing efforts.”

You won’t want to watch much of this boring video, but it does give you a good look at Blake Wentworth and his manner of communicating.

So what is going on here?

First, I can assure you that there is a huge amount of sexual activity taking place between professors and students at all universities. It’s virtually always consensual. It’s often student initiated. And a disproportionate amount of it involves feminist lesbian women professors seducing young coeds confused about their gender identity.

Secondly, no university that I am aware of has specific instructions regarding what is considered sexual harassment and what is OK. The general rule is that “romantic relationships” between a professor and his or her own students is forbidden. Once the teacher-student relationship is over, the parties are free to do as they wish.

Third, at my former university, the policy was always to side with the female when a complaint was lodged against a male professor. The idea of challenging some of the nut job feminist students who populate universities was off the table. I never heard of any female professor facing any consequences for her sexual indiscretions.

Now, coming to the specifics of the Blake Wentworth case, the following thoughts occur to me.

1. Two of the ladies are nonwhite and the third one has that short, feminist haircut and mode of dress that sets off alarms in my mind. Wentworth ought to have avoided all three. The two Latinas come across as having a grudge against whites. What’s interesting though is that THEY PICKED HIM TO WORK WITH. They could have picked anyone. Students have to seek out a professor to work with when doing one on one work.

2. Wentworth sexually assaulted no one. It’s ridiculous to call putting hands on hands “inappropriate touching.” This is not Victorian England. I guarantee you that all of these women are highly sexually experienced, with lewd sexual appetites. I only met a few “innocent” coeds during my time at the university and they were 18 year old freshmen.

3. I strongly suspect that these women were flirtatious with the professor. I cannot speculate what turned their willingness to play the mating game into a vendetta.

4. As I read the story, none of them explicitly told Wentworth that his flirtations were unwanted. This is another example of where women expect a man to read her mind.

5. Wentworth is stupid, but probably not evil. In a reasonable workplace setting a boss might have called him in and warned him to cool it.

6. I reiterate my general principle that every male has the right to woo any female of his choice, while she has the right to reject him. And believe me, these girls know how to reject guys in bars. Watching guys get shot down in Texas bars used to be one of my hobbies decades ago when I briefly explored the singles bar scene.

Am I wrong? Does Wentworth deserve to be fired? To have zero future job prospects? To be a target of hate from social justice warriors?