More texts turned over from Jewish FBI agent taken off Mueller team, but five months of texts are MISSING


There’s the smell of (((Deep State))) criminality to the entire Obama administration’s response to the candidacy of Donald Trump.

This whole slow motion train wreck is a disgrace. Hillary Clinton was obviously treated as if she’s above the law, while the plot to overthrow Donald Trump for nonexistent Russian collusion smacks of treason.

ABC News

The Justice Department has turned over to Congress additional text messages involving an FBI agent who was removed from special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigative team following the discovery of derogatory comments about President Donald Trump.

But the department also said in a letter to lawmakers that its record of messages sent to and from the agent, Peter Strzok, was incomplete because the FBI, for technical reasons, had been unable to preserve and retrieve about five months’ worth of communications.

Continue reading

Explosive Interview with Former Congressman Jason Chaffetz Reveals Hillary Clinton Retains WH Security Clearance

Hillary Clinton and the lackeys who surround her still have their full security clearances, allowing them daily access to all Trump administration information. That’s according to former Congressman Jason Chaffetz, who recently resigned from Congress.

Could Hillary be the source of the leaks that are damaging to national interests? For example, Hillary apparently would have had access to the transcripts of Trump’s phone calls to the president of Mexico and the PM of Australia.

Five minutes.

Published on Aug 6, 2017


NUTS! U.S. Navy Seals to Get First Women, Including One Trans “Woman”

American general Anthony McAuliffe replied “Nuts!” when the Germans requested that he and his troops surrender during the Battle of the Bulge.

“Nuts!” seems like a good response to feminists who demand that women serve in elite combat units in the American military. It also seems like a good reply to trannies who no longer have their nuts but also demand slots in high powered combat roles.

Even if standards are maintained, there are still problems with putting women into combat units. As to trannies, well that’s so ridiculous as to be cringeworthy.

One of the big problems is that too many men are White Knights at heart. They’re going to be distracted by having a female beside them in combat. They’re going to take unnecessary risks that they wouldn’t take if they were part of an all male unit.

Besides, women belong in traditional roles, which proved to the optimal arrangement for society for thousands of years. Countries whose military avoid gender politics are going to be at a distinct advantage should a hot war break out.

Excerpt from Military

More than a year after a mandate for the Pentagon opened previously closed ground combat and special operations jobs to women, officials say the Navy has its first female candidates for its most elite special warfare roles.

Two women were in boot camp as candidates for the Navy’s all-enlisted Special Warfare Combatant-Craft Crewman program, Naval Special Warfare Center Deputy Commander Capt. Christian Dunbar told members of the Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Service in June.

Another woman, who sources say is a junior in an ROTC program at an unnamed college, has applied for a spot in the SEAL officer selection process for fiscal 2018, which begins Oct. 1, and is set to complete an early step in the pipeline, special operations assessment and selection, later this summer, he said.

Kristin Beck, pictured below, was retired from the SEALS when he made the transition. Prior to changing her name to Kristin, she was known as Christopher. “She” was still a he while in the military.

Continue reading

Drudge Dredges Up 2014 Story About Obama’s Secret Outreach to Russia to Help Embattled Trump


By now, you know the script. You could probably write some of fake news that the MSM writes.

Whenever President Donald Trump does what his predecessors have done during the normal course of business, just write a slanted article that demonizes the “orange cheeto.” Ever notice the liberal’s anti-white racism in drawing attention to Trump’s color? The MSM never gave Obama insulting nicknames related to black: black spade, black mack daddy, black cloud, etc.

(((Matt Drudge))) does what he can to balance out the unrelenting negative media coverage of Trump. The linked excerpt from Bloomberg is the big headline on Drudge tonight: JARED WHO?

Bloomberg December 31, 2014

President Barack Obama’s administration has been working behind the scenes for months to forge a new working relationship with Russia, despite the fact that Russian President Vladimir Putin has shown little interest in repairing relations with Washington or halting his aggression in neighboring Ukraine.

This month, Obama’s National Security Council finished an extensive and comprehensive review of U.S policy toward Russia that included dozens of meetings and input from the State Department, Defense Department and several other agencies, according to three senior administration officials. At the end of the sometimes-contentious process, Obama made a decision to continue to look for ways to work with Russia on a host of bilateral and international issues while also offering Putin a way out of the stalemate over the crisis in Ukraine.

“I don’t think that anybody at this point is under the impression that a wholesale reset of our relationship is possible at this time, but we might as well test out what they are actually willing to do,” a senior administration official told me. “Our theory of this all along has been, let’s see what’s there. Regardless of the likelihood of success.”

You can read the rest of the article by clicking on the link.

The point is that the MSM proves over and over that it’s nothing but the propaganda arm of the Deep State. No one accused Obama or Hillary Clinton or John Kerry of being a Russian agent for Obama’s outreach. The mainstream press is made up of liars, garbage people.

Alt-news reporter Jack Pesobiac makes the point in his latest Tweet.

Did Obama Have Justice Scalia Murdered?

The answer to the question in the title of this post is a qualified yes. Evidence of Obama’s involvement in murdering conservative jurist Scalia is not currently sufficient to prove that Obama was behind the strange, unexpected death. Obama certainly had the motivation. He would be able to replace a conservative with a Jewish liberal controlled by the power elites.

The Gateway Pundit

Judge Andrew Napolitano, Fox News senior judicial analyst, went on FOX Business Network on Monday to discuss allegations Senator Rand Paul and another senator were under surveillance by the Obama administration.

Napolitano also dropped a bomb on the Obama administration spying on the US Supreme Court.

Judge Napolitano: Justice Scalia told me that he often thought the court was being surveilled. And he told me that probably four or five years ago…If they had to unmask Senator Paul’s name to reveal a conversation he was having with a foreign agent and the foreign agent was hostile to the United States they can do that. That’s not what he’s talking about. They’re talking about unmasking him when he’s having a conversation with his campaign manager when he’s running in the Republican primary.

During the discussion Judge Napolitano also said Barack Obama could be subpoenaed to testify if he viewed the unmasked intelligence.

When all of this Russia and Comey nonsense dies down, Congress must launch an investigation of Obama, which will probably land him where he belongs–in prison, keeping Hillary company.

Secret Sources: Mike Cernovich Explains How He Learned About Susan Rice

In a nutshell, Mike Cernovich’s online fame allowed him to make contacts with pro-Trump IT people in newsrooms. They can read every email. Those folks supply him with things the press doesn’t want you to know.


Ever since Mike Cernovich dropped the bombshell report over the weekend outing Obama’s National Security Advisor, Susan Rice, as the person behind the unmasking of the identity of various members of Trump’s team who were ‘incidentally’ surveilled during the 2016 campaign (see “Confirmed: Susan Rice “Unmasked” Trump Team”), a report which was subsequently confirmed by Eli Lake of Bloomberg earlier this morning, everyone has been wondering who within the Trump White House or the intelligence community supplied him with such a massive scoop.

But, as it turns out, Cernovich didn’t need a ‘deep throat’ within the NSA or CIA for his blockbuster scoop, all he needed was some well-placed sources inside of a couple of America’s corrupt mainstream media outlets. As Cernovich explains below, his sources for the Susan Rice story were actually folks working at Bloomberg and the New York Times who revealed that both Eli Lake (Bloomberg) and Maggie Haberman (NYT) were sitting on the Susan Rice story in order to protect the Obama administration.

“Maggie Haberman had it. She will not run any articles that are critical of the Obama administration.”

“Eli Lake had it. He didn’t want to run it and Bloomberg didn’t want to run it because it vindicates Trump’s claim that he had been spied upon. And Eli Lake is a ‘never Trumper.’ Bloomberg was a ‘never Trump’ publication.”

“I’m showing you the politics of ‘real journalism’. ‘Real journalism’ is that Bloomberg had it and the New York Times had it but they wouldn’t run it because they don’t want to run any stories that would make Obama look bad or that will vindicate Trump. They only want to run stories that make Trump look bad so that’s why they sat on it.”

“So where did I get the story? I didn’t get it from the intelligence community. Everybody’s trying to figure out where I got it from. I got it from somebody who works in one of those media companies. I have spies in every media organization. I got people in news rooms. I got it from a source within the news room who said ‘Cernovich, they’re sitting on this story, they’re not going to run it, so you can run it’.”

“If you’re at Bloomberg, I have people in there. If you’re at the New York Times, I have people in there. LA Times, Washington Post, you name it, I have my people in there. I got IT people in every major news room in this country. The IT people see every email so that’s how I knew it.”

(video at link)

And while this could certainly be interpreted as a clever ploy to protect his real sources, Cernovich’s video comments seem to be validated by both his tweet from yesterday afternoon…

In the 60s the press likewise kept the public ignorant about President Kennedy’s womanizing, which opened him up to blackmail.

Reporters shouldn’t allow their biases to show, but at least now we know that the press is not to be trusted.

This isn’t over though.

Orange is the New Black: Sean Spicer Addresses Susan Rice Unmasking


Most of the stories I’m seeing about the revelations that Susan Rice unmasked the names of Trump Team members in classified documents omit the name Hillary Clinton.

The developing story that points the finger at Rice has broken out big today as Mike Cernovich’s scoop finally drew MSM attention, but few want to speculate if the trail will lead to Obama and/or Hillary.

Mrs. Clinton is the person who would have benefited the most from the surveillance of Trump and his team. The press doesn’t seem to want us to think about that.

Smart reporters are probably trying to figure out how to steer the narrative back to the “Trump is a Russian agent” narrative. Rolling Stone’s Matt Taibbi has called the obsession with Russia “Putin Derangement Syndrome” in his article published today and featured on the Drudge Report. Taibbi has observed that if you’re not on board with the obsession, then you too are a Russian shill.

OK, just call me Boris.


Earlier this morning we noted that it was looking increasingly likely that Obama’s National Security Advisor, Susan Rice, was behind the unmasking of the identity of various members Trump’s team who were ‘incidentally’ surveilled during the 2016 campaign (see “Confirmed: Susan Rice “Unmasked” Trump Team”). If true, of course, this raises a number of questions about the Obama administration’s motives and whether various members of his team may have broken laws.

And while Spicer was somewhat non-committal on the issue at his daily press briefing earlier, pending the results of an ongoing investigation, he did say that new revelations were heading in a “troubling direction.”

Reporter: “Senator Rand Paul has called the reports that Susan Rice ordered the unmasking of Trump’s associates a “smoking gun”, does the President agree with that characterization and what does he think of these reports?”

Spicer: “There is an ongoing investigation, that we have supported, looking into this matter. I will say there is a troubling direction that some of this is going in. But we’re going to let this review go on before we jump to [conclusions].”

“But I think that it is interesting, the lack of interest that I’ve seen from the press corps in one set of developments versus another set of developments.”

Meanwhile, as Trump has pointed out many times, Spicer went on to tell Fox News that the most troubling part of the whole situation was the media’s apparent ‘lack of interest’ in the potentially illegal actions of Susan Rice versus their complete fascination with Trump’s alleged ties to Vladimir Putin for which no one has offered a single shred of evidence…

Watch the video on youtube if you prefer:

Heavy is on the story with a “5 Fast Facts” about Susan Rice. In the video above, she seems to be lying. She’s lied before. Specifically, she lied about the deaths of American officials at Benghazi.

The most significant fact about Susan Rice may be that she’s married to a white male ABC News executive, Ian Cameron.


Rice married Canadian-born ABC News producer Ian Officer Cameron[83] on September 12, 1992, at the St. Albans School chapel.[14] They met as students at Stanford.[84] They have two children, Jake and Maris.

The mainstream media is biased against Trump already. Imagine how much they want to protect Susan Rice, given that they all know her on a personal level through her husband.