Creep and creepy are words that feminists use like the word “nigger” to label white men who just might accidentally have an erection now and then. The man in this story that is starting to take off in the media likes younger women. That seems to be a criminal offense now.
SPOKANE, Wash. — A Spokane man took to Facebook after he was banned from a Spokane Starbucks.
The man, who we will not identify due to the fact he has not been charged with a crime, said last week he was at Starbucks on Main Street in Downtown Spokane. He said wrote a note asking out a barista. He said she is 16 years old. He is 37 years old.
“I was flirted with by a barista. For some reason she thought I was funny. Said I was funny. So I gave her a note to see if she’d be interested in dinner,” said the man in a public Facebook post that has since gone viral, with almost 4,500 shares and almost 3,000 likes.
He said he went into the same Starbucks the next day and a Spokane Police officer told him he was banned from that Starbucks location. Apparently, Starbucks management thought something in the note was inappropriate enough to get the police involved.
If the bolded phrase isn’t enough to keep you out of Starbucks, you’re hopeless.
The police get involved when a girl doesn’ want to go out with a man? That’s ridiculous.
“I know the female Starbucks barista was of legal age to date. I broke no laws. I merely took a chance with my heart. I’m tired of hearing the word “creep” as any black person or gay person is tired of hearing certain words. I have a whole webpage dedicated to age gap love,” said the man.
Philosophically, I take the position that any man has the right to ask out any female and she has the right to politely reject his request for a meet up. However, the phrase “legal age to date” is probably not a valid phrase. Our heart-driven Lothario in this case should probably confine his dating to age 18 and up. However, his take is not creepy nor does it justify police involvement.
He said he feels he is being discriminated against because of his age. He asked his Facebook friends to call and complain to Starbucks.
But his call-to-action was met with some strong opposition.
Many people commented on Starbucks’ page applauding them for banning the man. Others commented on their own personal experience in the service industry. Even people who don’t go to Starbucks commented in support of the ban.
Man haters gonna hate.
And the conversation reached far beyond Spokane. People commented from Texas, Pennsylvania and Massachusetts. And internationally as well, from Canada, Mexico and even the UK.
A Starbucks spokesperson said the company supports how management handled this situation.
“We have no tolerance for any such inappropriate behavior or harassment, and we will continue to support our store partners and local authorities investigating the situation,” said the Starbucks spokesperson.
But Starbucks did get some criticism on their page. One person said tossing him out was a little rash, and it seems excessive.
Spokane Police said any business has a right to refuse service to anyone for however long they choose. So Starbucks was legally allowed to ban the man from that location.
The last sentence is bullsh*t. (((Starbucks))) has no legal right to ban anyone because of their race or sexual orientation. Unless your race is white and your sexual orientation is heterosexual, aka NORMAL.