NY Times Compares Trump Campaign to Organized Crime as Manifort Wiretapping and Mueller Terror Tactics Revealed

ROBERT MUELLER. POSTER BOY FOR THE AMERICAN POLICE STATE.

PAUL MANAFORT. DEEP STATE WIRETAPS LASTED FOR YEARS.

No wonder President Trump was so disgusted when Jeff Sessions appointed Robert Mueller as Special Counsel.

Mueller is a (((Deep State))) terrorist, according to what we now know. Mueller’s police state tactics are worthy of the Stalinist Soviet Union.

The news that Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort was wiretapped since 2014 has broken big in the press, but the real news to any freedom-loving Constitutionalist is the big reveal on how dirtbag Mueller does business.

Zerohedge

With all of the massive hurricanes safely swirling far away from the continental U.S., for a few days at least, the New York Times and CNN has once again returned to their regularly scheduled programming: 24×7 Coverage Of Russian Collusion. Of course, just like their prior coverage, today’s ‘bombshell’ reports, which center around Paul Manafort, are heavy on the sensationalized story telling and light on the facts.

First, the New York Times brings us new, fascinating details of precisely how Robert Mueller raided Paul Manafort’s house earlier this summer using “shock-and-awe tactics to intimidate witnesses and potential targets of the inquiry.”

Paul J. Manafort was in bed early one morning in July when federal agents bearing a search warrant picked the lock on his front door and raided his Virginia home. They took binders stuffed with documents and copied his computer files, looking for evidence that Mr. Manafort, President Trump’s former campaign chairman, set up secret offshore bank accounts. They even photographed the expensive suits in his closet.

Continue reading

CNN, MSNBC, New York Times Totally Ignore Kansas ‘Kill All White People’ Murder Suspect

Repeat after me: There’s no conspiracy. It’s all in my mind.

Keep repeating it.

It still won’t be true no matter how often it’s repeated.

In economics we call it tacit collusion. The parties involved understand implicitly what they’re supposed to do.

What they try to do is to cover up black on white crime.

And push white on black crime (Dylann Roof) to absurd levels of coverage.

Trump is right. It’s fake news. It’s a mind game.

Daily Caller

A story about an African-American male who allegedly murdered multiple white men after once saying he wanted to “kill all white people” is being completely ignored by the liberal media.

Fredrick Demond Scott, a 22-year-old black male, has been charged this week with the murder of Steven Gibbons and John Palmer, two middle-aged white males. Gibbons was reportedly found dead on August 14 of this year and Gibbons was killed in Aug. 2016.

Scott is also a suspect in three other killings of white men.

This comes after Scott reportedly once said that he wanted to “kill all white people.”

Many media outlets appear to have completely ignored this story.

As of publishing, CNN.com returns no results for “Fredrick Demond Scott,” the name of the alleged anti-white killer:

MSNBC.com does not either:

The New York Times did have one story return in the search of his name, but it was the auto-posted Associated Press story, not an original news report:

Related searches like “Kansas City shooting” did not return any results either.

CNN continues to employ Symone Sanders, a former Bernie Sander spokesperson who blamed President Trump for an incident in Chicago where a mentally disabled man was attacked and had his head slashed open while his assailants screamed “F**k white people” and “Fuck Donald Trump.”

Federal Judge Blocks Texas Ban on Sanctuary Cities

WETBACK PROTESTERS AT SAN ANTONIO’S FEDERAL COURT HOUSE.

A Mexican judge with the good fortune to be born on this side of the border has ruled that reining in sanctuary cities is not allowed. Judge Orlando Garcia has issued a temporary restraining order blocking the enforcement of Texas new law banning sanctuary cities within the state.

In all honesty, how can a Mexican judge be independent and unbiased in a case like this? He should have recused himself.

He was the judge assigned to my lawsuit, but offered to recuse himself because he teaches part-time at the university. I took him up on his offer and got a 85 year old white man assigned to my lawsuit, not that it did any good.

All of these judges rely heavily on their law clerks to research the law and write up their rulings for them. In South Texas, the law clerks are almost all Hispanic.

New York Times

HOUSTON — A federal judge in San Antonio on Wednesday blocked Texas from enforcing its ban on so-called sanctuary cities, questioning the constitutionality of a law that has pitted Republican state leaders against several Democratic-leaning cities.

The judge’s ruling was only temporary, and prevents the law from taking effect on Friday while a suit against it goes forward. But the decision, which Texas said it would appeal, served as a legal blow to one of the toughest state-issued immigration laws in the country and puts the brakes on a measure backed by the Trump administration that critics had called anti-Latino. The law has become so divisive that it served as the backdrop of a shoving match at the Texas Capitol between Hispanic Democratic lawmakers and their white Republican colleagues.

The law, known as Senate Bill 4 or S.B. 4, prohibits cities and counties from adopting policies that limit immigration enforcement, allows police officers to question the immigration status of anyone they detain or arrest and threatens officials who violate the law with fines, jail time and removal from office. It also directs local officials to cooperate with so-called immigration detainer requests, which allow foreign-born detainees to be transferred to federal custody after they are released from state or local custody.

A number of the state’s biggest cities, including Houston, Austin, San Antonio and Dallas, all of which are run by Democrats, joined a lawsuit against Texas seeking to strike down the law, which was passed by the Republican-controlled Legislature and signed by the Republican governor, Greg Abbott, in May.

JUDGE ORLANDO GARCIA AND HIS COURTHOUSE. IT’S ROUND.

Continue reading

Bannon Speaks: “I’m Going To War For Trump”

I stand with Bannon. Get the war going ASAP. Drain the swamp. Name the traitors.

Scroll down past the story to read a comment written by Paul Kersey, whom I assume is the publisher of SBPDL.

In other related news, Trump’s friend (((Carl Icahn))) has thrown Trump under the bus after exiting the Trump train over Charlottesville and Confederate monuments.

Zerohedge

While Breitbart has warned of war ‘against’ Trump [4] – should he break from the policies upon which he was elected – former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon has spoken for the first time since being fired today.

In an interview with Bloomberg, Bannon said he was “going to war” for Trump…

“If there’s any confusion out there, let me clear it up.

I’m leaving the White House and going to war for Trump against his opponents… on Capitol Hill, in the media, and in corporate America,”

So, war it is!

Presumably, being outside The White House allows him more freedom to pursue his tactics. The question is – given the narrative being spun is he resigned by mutual agreement – does Bannon stil have Trump’s ear? And if so, will Cohn, Kelly, and Kushner stand for it? We already know his agenda is anything but in line with theirs. [6]

Notably The White House formally launched a probe of China’s intellectual property practices tonight – invoking Section 301 just as Bannon had said.

With regard his internal adversaries, at the departments of State and Defense, who think the United States can enlist Beijing’s aid on the North Korean standoff, and at Treasury and the National Economic Council who don’t want to mess with the trading system, Bannon was ever harsher…

“Oh, they’re wetting themselves,” he said, explaining that the Section 301 complaint, which was put on hold when the war of threats with North Korea broke out, was shelved only temporarily, and will be revived in three weeks. As for other cabinet departments, Bannon has big plans to marginalize their influence.

“That’s a fight I fight every day here,” he said. “We’re still fighting. There’s Treasury and [National Economic Council chair] Gary Cohn and Goldman Sachs lobbying.”

“We gotta do this. The president’s default position is to do it, but the apparatus is going crazy. Don’t get me wrong. It’s like, every day.”

Bannon dismissed the far-right as irrelevant:

“Ethno-nationalism—it’s losers. It’s a fringe element. I think the media plays it up too much, and we gotta help crush it, you know, uh, help crush it more.”

“These guys are a collection of clowns,” he added.

And finally, Bannon scoffed at The Democrats…

“…the longer they talk about identity politics, I got ’em. I want them to talk about racism every day. If the left is focused on race and identity, and we go with economic nationalism, we can crush the Democrats.”

* * *

Kurt Bardella, a Republican communications specialist who worked for Bannon at Breitbart but later denounced him, predicts the strategist would “feel liberated” by his departure.

“Now, he will be able to operate openly and freely to inflict as much damage as he possibly can on the ‘globalists’ that remain in the Trump Administration.”

Paul Kersey wrote in reply:

It’s looking more and more like it’s Kushner’s Presidency to lose.

Kushner and Bannon have battled for the position of Trump’s Rasputin since before the election. One week Kushner might be on top, and the next week it could be Bannon.

Then came Trump’s comments supporting the alt-right in Charlottesville. Bannon is blamed for putting those ideas in Trump’s ear.

Then there was the “off the record” Bannon interview, in which Bannon denies Trump’s potential military solution to North Korea, and in which Bannon talks about whom he is going to fire.

Then there’s the Bannon rental house in Miami interview. A tub filled with acid, porn movies and a meth lab are all in the story. It’s as if Bannon said, “Give me liberty, or give me meth”.

We hear that Trump’s cabinet members and advisors, former Goldman Sach Prez Cohn, former Soros partner Mnuchin, former Rothschild leader Ross, LBO king Ichan (who left Trump Town today) and goldmanite son-in-law Kushner, are highly offended by the Nazis chanting “Jews will not replace us”.

Well, Steve Bannon will not be chanting, “Jews will not replace us”, because he will be replaced. If one works in the Trump Administration, one shouldn’t get close enough to a moving bus, because one never knows when one will be thrown under said bus.

PRESIDENT KUSHNER AND FRIENDS.

Steve Bannon #1 Trending on Twitter

#NEVERTRUMP IS CONTROLLING THE DIALOGUE ON TWITTER RIGHT NOW.

Ann Coulter Retweeted Molyneux’s top Tweet:

Our side is losing the Twitter battle right now, as deadbeat Democrats are having a field day on Twitter. More from all sides:

I’m sensing more than seeing directly that impeachment efforts are heating up again. Liberals believe that the Trump presidency is already destroyed. Now they’re trying to turn Republicans, enough of them to guarantee impeachment, their way. The question is whether a back room deal can be worked out by the Republicrats and Democans.

Resist! This storm shall pass too.

Breaking! Trump Fires Bannon

With Steve Bannon gone, two themes will likely emerge:

1. The globalists now have control of the White House. President Trump will have to rely on the people to somehow get the message to him that we elected him as a no-compromise anti-globalist.

2. Steve Bannon can be a greater asset to our cause outside the White House, if he still has fight left in him. He’s been shunted off the to side by Chief of Staff General Kelly anyway. Drudge has suggested that he may return to Breitbart. In fact, he has a poll up on Drudgereport about Bannon’s future. At Breitbart, Bannon can help increase awareness of exactly how the inner workings of the Trump White House function. He can also provide more accurate analysis of who our enemies within the White House are.

New York Times

Trump Tells Aides He Has Decided to Remove Stephen Bannon

President Trump has told senior aides that he has decided to remove Stephen K. Bannon, the embattled White House chief strategist who helped Mr. Trump win the 2016 election, according to two administration officials briefed on the discussion.

The president and senior White House officials were debating when and how to dismiss Mr. Bannon. The two administration officials cautioned that Mr. Trump is known to be averse to confrontation within his inner circle, and could decide to keep on Mr. Bannon for some time.

As of Friday morning, the two men were still discussing Mr. Bannon’s future, the officials said. A person close to Mr. Bannon insisted the parting of ways was his idea, and that he had submitted his resignation to the president on Aug. 7, to be announced at the start of this week, but it was delayed in the wake of the racial unrest in Charlottesville, Va.

Mr. Bannon had clashed for months with other senior West Wing advisers and members of the president’s family.

But the loss of Mr. Bannon, the right-wing nationalist who helped propel some of Mr. Trump’s campaign promises into policy reality, raises the potential for the president to face criticism from the conservative news media base that supported him over the past year.

Mr. Bannon’s many critics bore down after the violence in Charlottesville. Outraged over Mr. Trump’s insistence that “both sides” were to blame for the violence that erupted at a white nationalist rally, leaving one woman dead, human rights activists demanded that the president fire so-called nationalists working in the West Wing. That group of hard-right populists in the White House is led by Mr. Bannon.

On Tuesday at Trump Tower in New York, Mr. Trump refused to guarantee Mr. Bannon’s job security but defended him as “not a racist” and “a friend.”

“We’ll see what happens with Mr. Bannon,” Mr. Trump said

Mr. Bannon’s dismissal followed an Aug. 16 interview he initiated with a writer with whom he had never spoken, with the progressive publication The American Prospect. In it, Mr. Bannon mockingly played down the American military threat to North Korea as nonsensical: “Until somebody solves the part of the equation that shows me that ten million people in Seoul don’t die in the first 30 minutes from conventional weapons, I don’t know what you’re talking about, there’s no military solution here, they got us.”

He also bad-mouthed his colleagues in the Trump administration, vowed to oust a female diplomat at the State Department and mocked officials as “wetting themselves” over the consequences of radically changing trade policy.

Of the far right, he said, “These guys are a collection of clowns,” and he called it a “fringe element” of “losers.”

“We gotta help crush it,” he said in the interview, which people close to Mr. Bannon said he believed was off the record.

Mr. Bannon’s departure was long rumored in Washington. The president’s new chief of staff, John F. Kelly, a retired Marine Corps general who was brought on for his ability to organize a chaotic staff, was said to have grown weary of the chief strategist’s long-running feud with Lt. Gen. H. R. McMaster, the national security adviser.

Mr. Bannon had been aligned with Mr. Kelly’s predecessor, Reince Priebus, who was forced out in late July. More significantly, Mr. Bannon has been in a battle with Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and senior adviser, since the spring.

Mr. Bannon, whose campaign against “globalists” was a hallmark of his tenure steering the right-wing website Breitbart.com, and Mr. Kushner had been allies throughout the transition process and through the beginning of the administration.

But their alliance ruptured as Mr. Trump elevated the roles of Gary D. Cohn, his top economic policy adviser and a former official at Goldman Sachs, and Dina Powell, a former Bush administration official who also worked on Wall Street. Mr. Cohn is a registered Democrat, and both he and Ms. Powell have been denounced by conservative media outlets as being antithetical to Mr. Trump’s populist message.

Mr. Cohn is a registered Democrat, and both he and Ms. Powell have been denounced by conservative media outlets as being antithetical to Mr. Trump’s populist message.

Roger Stone’s critique of Bannon certainly didn’t help his cause.

More later as this developing story shakes out.

Pence Denies Run for the White House in 2020, Contradicting “disgraceful and offensive” New York Times

American Vice-President Mike Pence boldly pushed back against the New York Times on Sunday. He specifically denies that he plans to run for president in 2020. Such a plan would undercut his boss, President Donald Trump.

Trump supporters had mostly been OK with Pence unti the Times story. Perhaps the Times has crafted a psy op, designed to make Trump and Trump supporters unhappy with his VP.

One common argument is that Pence is a leaker, out to bring down Trump quickly so that he can ascend to the presidency.

You can judge for yourself the sincerity of Pence’s denial and whether you think he could be a leaker.

AP via NOLA

Vice President Mike Pence has pushed back against a news report suggesting he is laying groundwork for a possible presidential bid in 2020 if President Donald Trump does not run.

In a statement released by the White House, Pence said Sunday’s story in The New York Times “is disgraceful and offensive to me, my family, and our entire team.” He added that “the allegations in this article are categorically false.”

The formal rebuttal of a news report by the vice president was an unusual move. In it, Pence also said his team will “focus all our efforts to advance the president’s agenda and see him re-elected in 2020.”

The report details efforts of several Republicans looking ahead to 2020, calling it a “shadow campaign.” It notes Pence’s political schedule and active fundraising, though it also says unnamed advisers have signaled that he’d only run if Trump doesn’t.

The article noted Pence has set up a fundraising committee. Called the Great America Committee, it can accept checks of up to $5,000 from individual donors. Pence raised about $1 million at a Washington fundraiser last month, attended by dozens of lawmakers and featuring remarks from White House adviser Ivanka Trump.

Trump has not suggested he won’t seek a second term. But his first six months in office have been turbulent, marked by staff infighting, legislative struggles and a series of investigations.

White House counselor Kellyanne Conway also dismissed the report and said Pence is readying to run in 2020 “for re-election as vice president.”

“Vice President Pence is a very loyal, very dutiful, but also incredibly effective vice president, and active vice president, with this president,” said Conway on ABC’s “This Week.” ”He is a peer to the president in the West Wing.”

New York Times spokeswoman Danielle Rhoades Ha said in an emailed statement: “We are confident in the accuracy of our reporting and will let the story speak for itself.”