Steve Bannon #1 Trending on Twitter

#NEVERTRUMP IS CONTROLLING THE DIALOGUE ON TWITTER RIGHT NOW.

Ann Coulter Retweeted Molyneux’s top Tweet:

Our side is losing the Twitter battle right now, as deadbeat Democrats are having a field day on Twitter. More from all sides:

I’m sensing more than seeing directly that impeachment efforts are heating up again. Liberals believe that the Trump presidency is already destroyed. Now they’re trying to turn Republicans, enough of them to guarantee impeachment, their way. The question is whether a back room deal can be worked out by the Republicrats and Democans.

Resist! This storm shall pass too.

Steve Bannon’s Candid New Interview May Get Him Fired

This is #2 of two posts today on Steve Bannon. I wasn’t planning to do these today, but the Bannon interview on Wednesday has hit the trending news big this morning. It’s the big story on Drudge this morning, for example.

Bannon’s opinion is that White Nationalism needs to be crushed because White Nationalists are clowns and losers.

Hmmm. Big, if really true.

But Bannon could easily be gaslighting liberals with those remarks.

The other focus in the interview was on Chinese economics and North Korean military threats. I’ve bolded the things that may cause the President to blow his stack.

83 percent, including me, voted “No” in this poll. I don’t think the new interview is going to change that.

Washington Post

Stephen K. Bannon, the White House chief strategist, seemed to take issue with President Trump on North Korea, attacked white supremacists as “clowns” and “losers” and described his efforts against administration rivals in an unusual interview Wednesday with The American Prospect, a progressive magazine.

Continue reading

What Evil Nazi Steve Bannon Thinks About Chalottesville

This is #1 of two posts on Steve Bannon. This one represents some things he’s allegedly said. If true, he’s smart and he’s one of us. If true, Trump is also very smart in spite of all the comments I see in the media about how dumb he is. LOL. So dumb he beat Hillary’s sorry a**.

Axios

On Tuesday night, while Gary Cohn was fuming about President Trump’s latest comments, Steve Bannon was excitedly telling friends and associates that the “globalists” were in mass freakout mode.

Today, Bannon reveled in the disbanding of the president’s business council, seeing this as yet more evidence that the Trump administration is at odds with the “Davos crowd,” as Bannon often calls these corporate elites, in a voice dripping with contempt.

Bannon saw Trump’s now-infamous Tuesday afternoon press conference not as the lowest point in his presidency, but as a “defining moment,” where Trump decided to fully abandon the “globalists” and side with “his people.”

Per a source with knowledge: “Steve was proud of how [Trump] stood up to the braying mob of reporters” in the Tuesday press conference.
This account of Bannon’s thinking has come from conversations with his friends and associates who’ve been in touch with him since the racist carnage in Charlottesville.

Bannon has not meaningfully advised the president about his response to Charlottesville. He’s still on the outs with Trump, who has been calling him a leaker for weeks, though the president described Bannon as a good person on Tuesday.

They spoke by phone on Saturday, Sunday and Monday, according to a source with knowledge of the calls, but the response to Charlottesville has been all Trump, and Trump at his purest.

On the phone to Bannon, Trump asked his chief strategist “where does it end?” according to a source with knowledge of their conversations.
Trump wasn’t referring to the white supremacists, but to the counter-protesters whom the president believes are on a slippery slope towards “changing history” by tearing down monuments of Confederate heroes and potentially, he has said, the Founding Fathers like George Washington, who owned slaves.

Bannon, who is in New York today, has a view of Trump’s Charlottesville response that horrifies many of his West Wing colleagues:

Unlike some of Trump’s other top aides — who have varied on a spectrum between frustration and disgust since the president’s Charlottesville remarks — Bannon has unapologetically supported Trump’s instinct to apportion blame to “both sides.”

Sources who’ve spoken with Bannon since Charlottesville say he views this moment as analogous to the campaign moment when Hillary Clinton condemned half of Trump’s supporters to a “basket of deplorables.”

Bannon believes that if Trump condemned all the people who protested the pulling down of the Robert E. Lee statue then he’d fall into a trap set by leftists, the establishments of both parties, and the mainstream media. (Some of Bannon’s colleagues say this is an absurd argument. They point out it was a crowd of white supremacists holding tiki torches and chanting racist slogans, and that this is no time for the president to be searching for the “fine people” in the group. They say Trump should be condemning the tiki torch crowd unequivocally and leaving the debate over statues and free speech to another, less racially-heated, day.)

Bottom line: Both Trump and Bannon are of one mind, and, within the White House at least, theirs is a minority view. They saw the backlash to Charlottesville as an example of political correctness run amok and instinctively searched for “their” people in that group of protesters. Bannon has told associates that Trump, on Tuesday afternoon, took it to the next level for the country by asking where does it end? He especially loved Trump’s line: “I wonder, is it George Washington next week?”

It’s almost impossible to disagree with Bannon. The firestorm of hate directed at Trump on Twitter came heavily from bots. The media is going to challenge Trump no matter what he says. The bought and paid for neocon RINOs are going to stab Trump in the back when they can get away with it by having the media cover for them.

Charlottesville Leader Jason Kessler Exposed as Deep State Stooge

JASON KESSLER. FORMER LEFTIST LOON. STILL IS?

Jason Kessler, the man behind the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, has been exposed as a former Obama supporter and a leftist Occupy member.

In the video below, Kessler recites a poem he wrote called “White Devils”. He expresses anti-Christian and anti-white views in the short video.

Suspicion is growing that the Nazis at the rally were paid agitators, hired by the left to start trouble with the paid leftist Antifa members.

Market Ticker

What if it’s all a scam?

What if Jason Kessler isn’t really a right-wing extremist?

What if Jason Kessler used to be involved with Occupy Wall Street and was a strong Obama supporter — right up until, quite-literally to the day, Trump won the election?

What if he’s nothing more than a stooge?

In other words, what if Jason Kessler is just a plain old-fashioned *******-for-hire?

Hmmmm…..

At one recent speech in favor of Charlottesville’s status as a sanctuary city, Kessler live-streamed himself as an attendee questioned him and apologized for an undisclosed spat during Kessler’s apparent involvement with Occupy. Kessler appeared visibly perturbed by the woman’s presence and reminders of their past association.

May I remind you that The Southern Poverty Law Center, the source of the above, is thought of as a fairly hard-left organization. In other words, it’s extremely unlikely they’d try to smear this guy with an unwarranted claim that he was involved with a hard-left cause! Yet there’s the accusation that he was formerly associated with Occupy, a socialist (if not communist) cause that was about as diametrically opposed to the KKK or “alt-right” as one can imagine.

Further, nearly all of the SPLC’s documented incidents of his “hard right” behavior appear to date to just after and beyond the 2016 elections.

Hmmmm….

Again folks: What if all — or at least most — of Charlottesville was manufactured by people operating through paid stooges with the explicit intent of fomenting violence — or worse?

One of the “intended speakers” for that event, I note (no idea if he actually spoke) is someone who has apparently stated that he’d like to see a second Civil War in America.

And finally, what if — just what if — Trump knew of this jackass’ history when he said that the hate and violence was present “on many sides”?

What if Trump is right and this entire incident was basically manufactured, seeking and utilizing paid stooges to set up a volatile situation which the police not only allowed to turn bad but they appear to have had a hand in intentionally stoking the violent behavior of those present by chasing off the so-called alt-right folks right into the much-larger Antifa crowd?

Oh, sure, the people who were beaten and died still were beaten and died and everyone involved in that — on both sides — needs to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. But it matters quite a bit, I suspect, if the so-called “Nazis” involved in this were paid Nazis — that is, stooges paid to show up, put on a “uniform” with some sort of “identity” and start trouble. Further, one must ask: Why were the cops told to stand down, who gave that order along with the order to force the original protesters into the waiting maw of the counter-protesters and what sort of political affiliation does everyone involved in that decision hold?

The job of the police when there are demonstrations (which are lawful, permit or no permit) and counter-demonstrators show up is to keep the two sides apart. Let them scream at each other across a street if they want; free speech is important, and to be protected.

Intentionally forcing one of the demonstrating groups into and through the opposing group is a felony criminal act and when done by a police officer or officers is a rank violation of federal law — specifically, 18 USC 242 which makes it a criminal act to deprive anyone in the United States of their lawful Constitutional Rights under power of law or authority.

Maybe there are a few more (serious) criminal charges that need to be filed than would first appear to be necessary…..

World Net Daily has picked up the story and is asking the same questions.

But before Kessler organized “Unite the Right” rally, it appears he was a fan of President Obama, President Clinton, gun control, Occupy Wall Street, Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran and other leftist causes.

The Southern Poverty Law Center, an extreme leftist group that’s hostile to conservatives, reported that Kessler appears to have a history of leftist activism and only expressed a “rightward shift” in November 2016 – around the time of President Trump’s election.

I wonder how much George Soros paid this mole, if these stories are true.

Kessler defends himself in the WND piece. I think his defense is a lie. Soros likely paid him to join the Trump Train to sabotage it by starting a race war.

FBI Raided Ex-Trump Campaign Chair Paul Manafort’s Home in July

POLITICAL CONSULTANT PAUL MANAFORT.

An FBI raid on anyone connected to Donald Trump is going to have immense propaganda value in the Deep State effort to oust American President Donald Trump.

If we suppose for the sake of argument that Trump’s former campaign chair Paul Manafort is guilty of something, then he can be used as a pawn in the game of “get Trump.”

Business Insider

The FBI conducted a predawn July raid on the home of President Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, as part of its ongoing investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, The Washington Post reported Wednesday.

FBI agents working with special counsel Robert Mueller, who was appointed to lead the probe after former FBI Director James Comey was fired in May, left Manafort’s home “with various records,” according to the Post.

Manafort has been cooperating with investigators’ requests for relevant documents. But the search warrant obtained by the FBI in July indicates that Mueller managed to convince a federal judge that Manafort “could not be trusted to turn over all records in response to a grand jury subpoena,” the Post reported.

Manafort’s spokesman, Jason Maloni, confirmed in a statement that “FBI agents executed a search warrant at one of Mr. Manafort’s residences.”

“Mr. Manafort has consistently cooperated with law enforcement and other serious inquiries and did so on this occasion as well,” Maloni said.

An adviser close to the White House told the Post that the documents obtained by the FBI included material Manafort had already given to congressional investigators.

But former FBI special agent Asha Rangappa noted on Twitter that, in obtaining a warrant, the FBI evidently convinced a judge that there was probable cause a crime had been committed — and “that there was some risk that Manafort may try to remove conceal evidence despite cooperation.”

“This is significant,” Rangappa said, noting that when she was at the FBI predawn raides were often conducted at 5 a.m. in order “to catch target unawares, so they cannot destroy or remove evidence.” She added that anything the government finds “can be used to leverage Manafort,” especially if it shows “that he had been lying” to the government or Congress.

Former Justice Department spokesman Matthew Miller added that “a raid coming months into a probe” when the subject’s attorneys have been speaking to, and presumably cooperating with, the DOJ “suggests something serious.”

Former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti explained on Twitter that, to obtain a search warrant, the FBI must work with a federal prosecutor to lay out evidence in an affidavit showing probable cause that a search of the suspect’s home will uncover evidence of a crime.

“Why would the FBI want to search the home of a subject like Manafort? Because there may be documents, ledgers, and other records. More importantly, there may be computers and other digital media that contain communications,” Mariotti said.

A copy of the warrant will contain “a list of items that the FBI is authorized to seize,” he explained, and will “generally indicate what crime the FBI is investigating.”

Manafort, a longtime Republican operative who worked for a pro-Russian political party in Ukraine for nearly a decade before joining the Trump campaign, attended a meeting with two Russian lobbyists at Trump Tower in June 2016 that the campaign did not disclose at the time. Trump’s son, Donald Trump Jr., and son-in-law Jared Kushner also attended.

Last August, The New York Times discovered that a pro-Russian political party in Ukraine designated $12.7 million in undisclosed cash payments for Manafort, who had advised the party and its former leader, Viktor Yanukovych, for nearly a decade.

The ledger, and Manafort’s activities in Ukraine more broadly, have come under scrutiny since Yanukovych was ousted in 2014. Manafort was associated with at least 15 bank accounts and 10 companies in Cyprus, dating back to 2007, NBC reported in March.

On March 22, The Associated Press reported that Manafort was paid $10 million between 2006 and 2009 to lobby on behalf of Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska, a close Putin ally, using a strategic “model” that would “greatly benefit the Putin Government if employed at the correct levels with the appropriate commitment to success.”

Manafort has insisted that he has never received any illicit cash payments. But he has a “pattern” of using shell companies to purchase homes “in all-cash deals,” as WNYC has reported, and then transferring those properties into his own name for no money and taking out large mortgages against them.

Manafort’s tendency to form shell companies to purchase real estate is not illegal. But it has raised questions about how much Manafort has been paid throughout the decades he’s spent as a political consultant, and by whom.

All of this but no word on investigations of Loretta Lynch, Debbie Wasserman-Schutlz, and the Clinton Foundation.

What a crock!

Trump Praises Tough New U.N. Economic Sanctions on North Korea

KIM JONG UN MAY NOT BE SMILING ANYMORE.

Since previous sanctions have not prevented North Korea from testing missiles and nuclear bombs, there’s not much of a reason to expect that the new sanctions will achieve the desired result.

Furthermore, how much cash would the West be willing to pay Kim (and whoever is behind the scenes controlling him) if he would agree to stop the tests. He’s been paid before. Reasonable people would call it paying off a blackmailer.

But aside from all that, there’s the question of the American (((neocon))) policy makers desire for war with the North. Nothing seems to get done in the world today unless there’s a shekel or two for the Ashkenazim.

Sky News

The UN Security Council has unanimously backed a new resolution imposing fresh sanctions on North Korea in retaliation for its controversial nuclear programme.

Among the sweeping measures is an export ban aimed at depriving Pyongyang of $1bn (£767m) in annual revenue – around a third of its export earnings.

Kim Jong Un’s regime will be banned from selling coal, iron and iron ore, lead and lead ore, fish and seafood.

It will also be prevented from increasing the number of workers it sends overseas – whose earnings are another source of revenue for the regime.

President Trump said the move would have a “very big financial impact” on the reclusive state.

He tweeted: “United Nations Resolution is the single largest economic sanctions package ever on North Korea. Over one billion dollars in cost to N.K.”

The resolution will prohibit countries starting new joint ventures with the North and any fresh investment in current joint ventures.

Nine officials and the country’s main foreign exchange bank have also been added to the UN sanctions blacklist.

But there will not be the cuts to oil deliveries initially proposed by the US – a move which would have dealt a serious blow to the economy.

The Security Council has already imposed six rounds of sanctions that have failed to halt North Korea’s drive to improve its ballistic missile and nuclear weapons capabilities.

US ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley said penalties against the regime have now been taken “to a whole new level” and the Security Council had put the leader “on notice”.

She said: “This is the most stringent set of sanctions on any country in a generation.”

Meanwhile, UK ambassador to the UN, Matthew Rycroft, warned Kim Jong Un’s nuclear ambitions could be “catastrophic for the world”.

“North Korea bears full responsibility for the measures we have enacted,” he said.

“By acting in flagrant violation of its legal obligations, by going against the will of the Security Council expressed in countless resolutions, North Korea has chosen the path it now finds itself on.”

The US has been putting pressure on China, which accounts for 90% of the North’s trade, to enforce the sanctions.

The effectiveness of the new measures will be mostly down to whether Bejing cooperates.

Despite eventually backing the resolution, China and Russia had resisted the US clampdown – arguing dialogue with the North was the best way to persuade Pyongyang to halt its military ambitions.

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said he had urged his North Korean counterpart to abide by UN resolutions and end testing of missiles.

Savage: Civil War if Trump is Taken Down

Michael Savage (nee Weiner) is of a mind to be concerned about a Civil War 2.0 in America. The question is not whether he has a book to sell (see cover above), but whether he’s gauged the mood of the country correctly.

His warning to the (((Deep State))) may or may not change the minds of the arrogant fools who sit in the seats of power in washington. There’s not even agreement among those of us concerned about such things as to whether there’s the stomach for bloodshed.

It’s best that each of us keep his own personal war plans secret since we are being monitored constantly. However, on Infowars, Zerohedge, and WND, where the coverage of Savage’s warning has been posted, there’s split opinion about whether there’s enough of us to resist and fight, and if we do fight, who do we target. And there’s the issue of whether we can stop a civil war before it happens by using the vote, the courts, or pressure to get the Deep State actors to back off.

If there is a civil war, it will be white people against the other races.

Infowars

Millions of Americans will revolt if the globalists remove President Trump from office or render him powerless, radio host Michael Savage warned.

Americans could even “resort to mob violence” because they’ll have nothing to lose once they “are finally aware of the fact that they’ve been tricked by their society, and that no matter how hard they work as middle-class people” they have nothing to gain, the Savage Nation host said Friday.

“That is what’s going to happen in this country,” he pointed out. “You have not yet seen mob violence in this country. You’ve seen some mob violence instigated by George Soros’ mobs.”

“But you haven’t seen the thing I’m telling you is coming in this country. You haven’t seen the ‘Day of the Locust’ yet.”
Savage was referring to the 1939 novel The Day of the Locust, which analyzes the violent rage of Americans who slaved away their entire lives only to realize that the American dream was impossible for them to achieve.

“When Eddie finally gets up and says that’s the end of the road, and Eddie’s eyes turn red, and blood is in his eyes, Eddie will turn this society upside down,” the Savage Nation host said. “And if [the left] take(s) Trump down, through Mueller or through any other source and deny Eddie his vote, there will be a civil war in this country.”
“I’m warning you. All of you leftists who think you’re going to steal our vote, you’re wrong.”

“…But if you do the next step and steal our president, I warn you. You’ve seen nothing yet,” he added. “You will see the ‘Day of the Locust’ in this country.”

That said, the battle lines for a civil war were drawn even before Trump entered politics.

“Not since the run-up to the Civil War has the nation been more divided,” Savage wrote in his 2014 book Stop the Coming Civil War. “The battle lines have been drawn: The haves against the have-nots.”
However, the globalists may want a civil war: it’ll give them the chance to “transform” America into an EU-style technocratic tyranny which they control.

“Unfortunately for individual people living in this new system, it will also require authoritarian and centralized control over all aspects of life, from cradle to grave,” wrote Patrick Wood in his book Technocracy Rising.