Based Chick Makes a Youtube Video Condemning Muslim Apologists

No matter how politically incorrect, I personally don’t like the style of this type of video. Snark, cursing, an “empowered” young female making one obvious point after another is not appealing to me.

I’m posting this for you. If you like this, you can subscribe to her youtube channel.

Published on Mar 26, 2017
Of course it’s never islam’s fault because islam is the most peaceful religion on earth and if you don’t think so ur a racist

Someone Threw Rocks and a BIBLE Through a Mosque Window

SECURITY CAM STILL OF THE PERP.

Yawn! Who cares. Not me.

The Muslim presence in America is a stench in my nostrils.

However, a Rabbi and other Jew residents of Fort Collins, Colorado, quickly moved to rally behind the religion of pieces.

It’s funny how Muslims rarely attack Jews, isn’t it. You might think they’re in cahoots together against white Christians.

Yahoo

A mosque in Colorado was vandalised in the early hours of 26 March by an unidentified man who broke a glass window and threw in a Bible. Surveillance cameras at the Islamic Center of Fort Collins captured images of the intruder, a man who appeared to be in his late 20s or early 30s.

The suspect may have jumped over the centre’s high fence to get into the property and flipped over benches and garbage cans. He then unsuccessfully attempted to open doors of the building before breaking a tempered glass window and throwing a Bible inside.

President of the Islamic Center, Tawfik Aboellail, confirmed that the man could not get inside the building. Religious classes for children we cancelled following the break-in.

“Fear first and concern and frustration second,” Aboellail said. “Fear we come here to pray early in the morning what if this man was armed.”

“When we came we found a little Bible lying on the floor with no messages in it and the police took it as evidence,” he added.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations called on authorities to investigate the incident as a possible hate crime but police are reluctant to label it as such.

“We don’t know what the motive was, we know what the damage that was done and it’s early in an investigation and so we’ll look into it and let the facts guide us to where we go,” Fort Collins police Sgt. Dean Cunningham said, according to Fox 31.

Hundreds attended a rally Sunday evening in support of their Muslim neighbours. “This is not to be tolerated in Fort Collins,” Rabbi Hillel Katzir of Temple Or Hadash said. “People of faith know that an attack on one house of worship is an attack on all houses of worship and we need to be out here making a statement.”

JJEWS RALLY TO SAVE MUSLIMS FROM NEW HOLOCAUST.

Muslim Mainstream Media Gets Frisky (Fight Video)

We’re all one race–the human race.

Just keep repeating that, good goyim.

Huma Can’t Get Enough (((Weiner)))

Weekends are tough. There’s not much to write about, so here I am on a Saturday night forced to push out gossip about two of my least favorite people.

Excerpt from the New York Post

After years of public humiliation by her sext-a-holic husband, Anthony Weiner, 40-year-old Abedin finally separated from the former congressman in August, one day after The Post reported that he had sent yet another explicit photo to a woman — this one showing his toddler son asleep beside him.

But sources tell The Post that Hillary Clinton’s righthand woman is now giving the marriage another try.

“Huma has been working hard on her relationship with Anthony,” said a source close to the Abedin family. “He has been spending 80 to 90 percent of his time at the [Irving Place apartment] they share . . . If there is a disagreement, he goes to his mother’s apartment in Brooklyn.

“Both [his and her] families are hoping they will reconcile.”

Another source, who worked closely with Bill and Hillary Clinton for several years, corroborates this, saying the breakup was “more for optics for the campaign and [under] pressure from Hillary’s camp.”

It’s hard to believe a reconciliation is under consideration given how many times Weiner has betrayed his wife.

In May 2011, he accidentally tweeted out a photo of his erect penis in boxer briefs that he apparently meant to send privately to a college student. Asked about the tweet, he initially denied sending it. Two weeks later, Weiner resigned from Congress as more women with more photos emerged.

While Weiner was running for mayor in 2013, additional sexts and photos came out, posted under the alias “Carlos Danger.” Refusing to withdraw from the race, he came in fifth place with a mere 4.9 percent of the vote.

As his wife led Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, even more sexts were uncovered. Last September, the Daily Mail alleged that Weiner had sent ­X-rated messages to a 15-year-old girl. The next month, Abedin was sucked into the FBI’s investigation into Clinton’s e-mails after her then-estranged husband’s laptop was seized.

Despite all of this, the family friend said, the couple is still in love. They blame “the pressures of the campaign and presidential race . . . and him drifting off into obscurity” for Weiner’s most recent relapse, the friend added.

The friend said that since completing outpatient therapy for sex addiction last fall, Weiner has been continuing treatment in New York City.

“A lot of [their] friends believe this is an illness, that he is sick,” said the friend. But “Huma takes it into consideration that there’s been no affair, or physical contact that anybody is aware of. He never met [the women].”

Fake marriage? Fake news? I don’t know and don’t care that much. Someone in the Deep State thinks that the image of a Jew married to a Muslim promotes their cause.

The thing about Weiner is his actions toward a 15 year old girl, which I believe resulted in him having nude pictures of her on his computer. Isn’t that child porn by law?

Shouldn’t Weiner be under indictment? You know that he knows where the skeletons are buried. It wouldn’t surprise anyone if he ends up a suicide with two bullets to the back of the head.

Be careful, Weiner. Huma is probably setting you up.

82 Seconds of Terror and then …

… Khalid Masood, the London car terrorist, was shot by police, bringing his crime spree to an end.

That brief moment in time wasn’t much, but it was long enough for the complacent world to be reminded of just how dangerous the Muslim is.

NBC News

Wednesday’s terror attack in London lasted just 82 seconds from the time a driver plowed through crowds of pedestrians on Westminster Bridge to when he was fatally shot by police near Parliament, London’s Metropolitan Police Service said Saturday.

Four people, including a police officer, were killed in the vehicle and knife attack that began at 2:40 p.m. Police believe the suspect, Khalid Masood, acted alone but said investigators do not yet have a motive.

“We must all accept that there is a possibility we will never understand why he did this,” Deputy Assistant Commissioner Neil Basu said in a statement. “That understanding may have died with him.”

“Whilst the attack lasted only 82 seconds it will remain in the memories of many forever,” Basu said.

The terror group ISIS — which has encouraged terror plots involving vehicle attacks — claimed responsibility for the rampage, but there is no evidence Mansoor, 52, who was born in Britain, acted in the name of the terror group.

But ISIS is suffering big losses at home and is losing territory in Iraq and Syria, and the group could be trying to capitalize on the attack by claiming credit for it, analysts have told NBC News.

Police made several arrests following the terror attack, but most have been released with no further action. A 58-year-old man arrested in Birmingham was still in custody Saturday, police said.

“We are determined to understand if Masood was a lone actor inspired by terrorist propaganda or if others have encouraged, supported or directed him. If the latter proves to be the case, they will face justice,” Basu said in a statement.

Damn NBC. Masood was a violent freak, reflecting his genetic background.

His motive is the same as the motive of all other psychopaths who find it useful to follow the religion of peace. He enjoyed hurting people. Hia religion, the religion of pieces, offers nothing but the justification for murder.

So call it what it is: Islamic terrorism.

Justin Trudeau Bans All Criticism of Islam, Declares Diversity a Strength

Creeping Marxism from the left in Canada is today’s biggest news from America’s neighbor to the north.

Canadian freedom lovers should condemn the suppression of free speech. People concerned about their safety should also be very worried about the influx of Muslims into Canada.

Breitbart

The Canadian House of Commons has passed motion M103 which singles out the criticism of Islam as a form of “Islamophobia”. Critics condemn it as an attack on free speech.

Motion M103 was tabled by Iqra Khalid, a Muslim member of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Liberal Party. It states the government must “condemn Islamophobia and all forms of systemic racism and religious discrimination”, was taken to vote on Thursday evening where a total of 201 MPs voted for it and only 91 voted against, Canadian broadcaster Global News reports.

IRQA KHALID.

The text of the motion does not clarify what constitutes “Islamophobia” and has led many to speculate what that may mean in the future, with some critics fearing it could lead to Shariah law courts. This concern has led to the circulation of an anti-Shariah petition on the Parliament of Canada website, which has so far been signed by over 24,000 people.

Ms. Khalid, who was born in Pakistan and moved to the UK and then to Canada, said the definition of Islamophobia was: “The irrational hate of Muslims that leads to discrimination.”

When Conservatives asked her to remove Islamophobia from the motion, she said: “I will not do so, any more than I would speak to the Holocaust and not mention that the overwhelming majority of victims were six million followers of the Jewish faith and that anti-Semitism was the root cause of the Holocaust.”

Another part of the bill that has stirred controversy is the passage that asks the government to “recognise the need to quell the increasing public climate of hate and fear”. It is currently unknown what measures the government will take to “quell” “hate and fear” as the motion is not classified as a law and has no effect on current criminal law.

The Conservative Party of Canada are currently holding leadership elections and many of the candidates have come out against M103 including one of the frontrunners, Quebecer Maxime Bernier. Mr. Bernier, a conservative with libertarian free market leanings, said he voted against the bill tweeting: “Free speech is the most fundamental right we have. I am opposed to #m103. Canadians should be treated equally regardless of religion.”

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who during the election campaign championed Muslim women wearing hijabs and full face niqabs, dropped an appeal by the previous government that would not allow women to wear niqabs to Canadian citizenship ceremonies.

Trudeau has also appeared at many mosques, including one where the women weren’t allowed in the main prayer room with the men but were forced to pray in a separate area upstairs.

The self-proclaimed “feminist” Prime Minister said: “Diversity is a source of strength, not just a source of weakness, and as I look at this beautiful room — sisters upstairs — everyone here, (I see) the diversity we have just within this mosque, within the Islamic community, within the Muslim community in Canada.”

So I wonder if it’s OK to criticize Christians in Canada. Somehow I think it is.

British PM Teresa May: London Attack “not Islamic”

THE LONDON ATTACKER MUST HAVE BEEN AMISH.

Simple new rule for Teresa May and the huge number of cucks in Parliament: If it’s a Muslim attacker, then it’s Islamic terrorism.

Anything less than that simple statement is a lie.

History will record Teresa May as a liar.

The Independent

The Prime Minister has said it is “wrong” to describe the terror attack on Westminster Bridge and Parliament on Wednesday as “Islamic terrorism”.

Following her statement in the House of Commons on Thursday morning Theresa May was asked by Conservative MP Michael Tomlinson whether she agreed that the term was inappropriate.

He asked her: “It is reported that what happened yesterday was an act of ‘Islamic terror’.

“Will the Prime Minister agree with me that what happened was not Islamic, just as the murder of Airey Neave was not Christian, and that in fact both are perversions of religion?”

Ms May replied that she believed it was not right to use the term, suggesting that such ideology was “perversion”.

“I absolutely agree, and it is wrong to describe this as ‘Islamic terrorism’,” she said.

“It is ‘Islamist terrorism’, it is a perversion of a great faith.”

Mr Tomlinson’s question referred to the killing of a Conservative MP by the Irish National Liberation Army in 1979 by car bomb attack at the House of Commons.

In making her statement Ms May appeared to correct her Defence Secretary Michael Fallon, who this morning said there was a working assumption that the attack was linked to “Islamic terrorism”.

“It was no accident that this attack was on Westminster, because it is at Westminster that we debate differences, very sharp differences, very freely and respectfully between us, and this kind of Islamic terrorism doesn’t respect those differences, so it is no accident that there was an attack here,” he had said in a statement.