Alleged Movement to Change Swedish Flag to Muslim Star and Crescent Claimed to be Hoax

ALLEGED DESIGN FOR NEW SWEDISH FLAG.

A movement on social media intended to change the flag of Sweden to make it more Muslim friendly has been exposed as a hoax, says the BBC.

The BBC makes a big deal out of the decline in traffic to 4 chan. Obviously, eyeballs would be down since Trump won. His fight for the presidency increased views at many alt-right and conservative web sites. People has stopped to catch their breath a little, I think.

Parodying the left is still a productive endeavor, which 4 chan will probably continue so long as the lunatic left keeps up its crazy behavior.

Let Swedes continue to celebrate with the cross.

Excerpt from the BBC

Internet pranksters tried to start a hoax campaign to change the cross on the Swedish flag to a Turkish-style crescent and star. Although a few people were tricked, the lacklustre response to the campaign co-ordinated on 4chan could be a sign that the extreme message board’s influence on internet culture is starting to wane.

The petition on campaigning site Avaaz.org was written in strident, over-the-top language by someone trying to mimic a hard-left activist: “The Swedish flag is a constant reminder of our dark and oppressive past. Refugees and migrants are forced to live under its Christian Cross; a symbol of the Crusades and the slaughter of millions of innocent Islamic lives in Sweden’s past that makes them feel unwelcome and unsafe. Sweden should be a safe space for everyone.”

But there are several clues pointing to the fact that the campaign was not an authentic drive to swap the Christian imagery on the Swedish flag for a symbol associated with Islam. The petition was started not by a Swede but by “Elsa N.” whose location is listed on Avaaz as “United Kingdom”.

And chat on 4chan’s “Politically Incorrect” (or “/pol/”) message board shows that the idea was born not on the far left but on a corner of the internet known as a breeding ground for the white nationalist alt-right.

Since Monday, posts on the board have been pushing “Operation Swedistan”. One of the original threads outlined the aims of the effort, starting with: “Create significant traction in a movement to replace Sweden’s Christian flag with an Islamic crescent.”

The thread went on to speculate that “A movement will organically form defending the Christian flag of Sweden” and lead to rising nationalism. In response, the 4chan activists planned to: “Protest online against these movements defending the existing flag. Claim that all those that wish to defend it are racist and xenophobic cretins that don’t wish for Sweden to be ‘Inclusive’ and ‘A safe space for everyone.'”

The petition that 4channers hoped would go viral attracted a few thousand signatures before it was taken down

The /pol/ board was famously a huge source of alt-right memes and internet propaganda during the 2016 US presidential election.

And the Swedish flag hoax was just the latest in a stream of 4chan plots designed to discredit leftist activists, call attention to the alt-right or poke fun at the mainstream media. Recently /pol/ users were urged to distribute leaflets saying “It’s OK to be white”. The pranksters hoped the posters, which were spotted in various locations around the world, would prompt a backlash by media outlets and (somehow) a counter-backlash which would convert people to white nationalism. The poster incidents were widely reported but the campaign’s origins were quickly revealed.

Crime Wave Engulfs Sweden as Fraud, Sexual Offenses Reach Record

What could be the cause of the crime wave in Sweden?

It must be a mystery to the Swedes since crime is forbidden by law.

Why does Sweden even need police?

The following data can’t be right.

Bloomberg

The number of Swedes who were victims of crimes such as fraud and sexual offenses jumped to the highest level on record last year.

A survey by the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention showed that 15.6 percent of people suffered one or more offences against the person (defined in the survey as assault, threats, sexual offences, robbery, fraud or harassment) last year. That’s up from 13.3 percent in 2015 and the highest number recorded since the annual Swedish Crime Survey started in 2006.

The number of offences against individuals “was at a relatively stable level 2005 to 2014, at 11.3 percent to 13.1 percent, but the last two years show an increase,” the council said in the report published this week. The crimes “that have had the clearest development in the past few years are harassment, fraud and sexual offences,” the agency said.

Of the six types of offences against the person, five of six rose to their highest level on record last year. The number of assault cases reached its second-highest level.

The number of victims of sexual offences rose to 1.7 percent in 2015 and to 2.4 percent in 2016 from an average of 0.9 percent between 2005 and 2014.

“Young women aged between 16 and 24 is the group that’s most subject to sexual offences, with 14 percent of young women stating that they were victims of at least one such crime during 2016,” the council said. “Among men in the same age group, 1.2 percent said they had been victims.”

Young women are also subject to harassment to a greater extent, the council said. They survey contains no answers as to why a certain type of crime increases, and analysis is needed to improve understanding of the reasons for the increase, it said.

Fewer than half of the crimes in the survey were reported to the police. Sexual offences, harassment and threats were the least reported while people most often notified the police of burglaries, the survey showed.

The number of property crimes against households, such as car theft and burglaries, rose slightly last year but is down compared with the level in 2006.

Why report a crime if the police will do nothing to secure justice.

Sweden is fuxated beyond repair.

The only cure is more diversity. Diversity is our strength. So, let’s have more of it.

Yes, for sure, more diversity is the answer.

An Attempt at Closure on the Contentious Issue of Interracial Romance

That post that I did last week titled Why Females Prefer Immigrant Men has so far given birth to 64 comments. That’s not a record for this site, but it is a lot.

Sometimes our prejudices lead us to focus on the wrong issues or explanations for things. That may be the case in that particular post.

We have some numbers to work with that came out last May. Let’s take a look at them and the context of our degenerate culture here in America.

Denver Post

More and more Americans are marrying people of different races and ethnicities, reaching at least 1 in 6 newlyweds in 2015, the highest proportion in American history, a new study released Thursday showed.

Currently, there are 11 million people — or 1 out of 10 married people — in the United States with a spouse of a different race or ethnicity, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data.

This is a big jump from 50 years ago, when the Supreme Court ruled interracial marriage was legal throughout the United States. That year, only 3 percent of newlyweds were intermarried — which means they had a spouse of a different race or ethnicity. In 2015, 17 percent of newlyweds were intermarried, a number which had held steady from the year before.

“There’s much greater racial tolerance in the United States, with attitudes having changed in a way where it’s much more positive toward interracial marriage,” said Daniel T. Lichter, director of the Institute for the Social Sciences at Cornell University, who studies interracial and interethnic marriages. “But I think that a greater reason is the growing diversity of the population. There are just more demographic opportunities for people to marry someone of another race or ethnicity.”

Asians were most likely to intermarry in 2015, with 29 percent of newlywed Asians married to someone of a different race or ethnicity, followed by Hispanics at 27 percent, blacks at 18 percent and whites at 11 percent.

There also were differences between men and women.

Asian and Hispanic women were the most likely to marry someone of a different race or ethnicity in 2015, while Hispanic and black men were the most likely among men, the data showed. Thirty-six percent of Asian women and 28 percent of Hispanic women intermarried in 2015, while 26 percent of Hispanic men and 24 percent of black men married someone of a different race or ethnicity.

White and black women were the least likely to consider someone of a different race or ethnicity in 2015. Only 10 percent of white women married outside their race or ethnicity, while only 12 percent of black women were involved in intermarriage — half the rate of black men.

White men were the least likely among males to consider intermarriage, with only 12 percent involved in interracial or interethnic marriages.

Despite those numbers, intermarriage is rapidly becoming more popular among blacks and whites. Since 1980, the number of blacks who chose to marry someone of a different race or ethnicity rose from 5 percent to 18 percent. Whites also have become more accepting of intermarriage, with the rates increasing from 4 percent to 11 percent during that same time period.

The first thing to say is that even one white person who marries outside his race is one too many. It’s the white race that created Western civilization and that keeps it alive. Whites should no more breed with other races than dog breeders should allow a champion pit bull to breed with a street cur. I don’t say that with any hate in my heart for street curs any more than I feel any hate when I say that whites shouldn’t breed with other races .

The second thing to note is that white men and white women are the most loyal to their race, even if not loyal enough. White women are slightly more loyal than white men, according to the data.

Someone could just as easily write a piece titled Why Men Prefer Immigrant Women as Why Women Prefer Immigrant Men.

The next thing that I think needs to be considered in all this is that men and women are propagandized by the (((media))) differently.

Men tend to be propagandized to pursue women of other races through porn and through the myth of exotic submissive animal sex.

Anotherbabe is a porn site that is as much propaganda working on the male erotic template as anything I’ve seen recently. Mixed in with a handful of white and black porn models are an enormous number of “mystery meat” brown skinned beauties. Adriana, below, is one of hundreds of examples on that site:

An erection isn’t necessarily rational, but a physical response. It’s unlikely that Ariana and her mystery meat sisters would fail in giving one.

That site will sometimes redirect you to Argentinalove, which sets out glamorous black bodies for the white man to lust after. Catera is one example of many:

I have no doubt that there are many weak white men who would see women such as these and be tempted to go find themselves one. I’m not even bringing up the many, many Asian girls who populate the porn world. White guys seem to prefer the Asian, which is really dangerous if those guys think those women are meek and submissive.

I should mention that I have a separate post on seductive Jewesses that I put up an hour or so ago. Jewish women are described as “bioweapons” on the source site for their ability to attract the white male.

If all of this temptation thrown at white men is hidden away on relatively obscure porn sites, the temptation thrown at white women is out in the open. Black men paired off with white women are everywhere on TV shows, TV commercials, movies, music videos, and so forth.

The miracle is that so many whites do stay loyal to their race when picking a marriage partner.

In the article above, Professor (((Lichter))) notes that there’s more of what he calls demographic opportunities to mate outside your race.

I don’t see how anyone can deny that. Inadvertently, the professor has made a powerful argument for the creation of a white homeland and until then, white enclaves in America. If you’re a guy and you don’t meet Adriana or Catera, above, you won’t be marrying them.

The problem for white men, as I noted crudely on Viking Bitch’s blog several years ago, is that “it’s all pink inside.” I heard that phrase when I gave a ride to a white sailor who was looking for what he called “Nigger pussy” in New Orleans decades ago. Apparently, he viewed sex with a “Nigger” as more satisfying than sex with a white woman.

By the way, I had no idea where a “Nigger whore house” was in New Orleans.

As to white women, they are bombarded with messages from the mainstream that it’s cool to marry a Nog, a Mexican, or a Chinaman. Especially the Nog. Even most of our Christian churches approve nowr

How to push the rate of interracial relationships involving whites back down to near zero is a problem for another post. It’s going to involve propaganda of the sort that AH pushed out. It’s also going to involve a lot more, including immigration policy.

What I hope I’ve accomplished here is bringing out some truth about race mixing and why it happens.

PROPAGANDA. THE PERFECT ARYAN FAMILY.

Based Florida International Republican Students Under Investigation, as Mestizo VP Quits Over Hate Speech

MARK ROSENBERG, PRESIDENT OF FIU.

The Jewish president of Florida International University, which is loaded with Mestizo students and professors, some illegal aliens, will decide the fate of the College Republicans club on campus.

The CR group ventured into politically incorrect speech online and now a highly vocal group of social justice warriors want the Republicans shut down. Basically, they advocated deporting illegals and building Trump’s wall.

That left “minority” students (the majority at FIU) feeling threatened.

The poor snowflakes.

Miami New Times

At Florida International University, the fallout over a leaked group chat from the school’s College Republicans is still spreading. After New Times first reported Friday about the chats — which show the young GOP students joking about deporting classmates and making light of the attack by a white supremacist in Charlottesville — the school announced it was investigating the group.

Now hundreds of students have signed a petition urging FIU President Mark Rosenberg to “take immediate action” against the College Republicans, and the club’s vice president has resigned over the “disgusting hate.” In fact, the former vice president says he had earlier reported the offensive comments to school authorities, who did nothing to curb the problem.

“I was elected VP and hoped I was able to cause real change and stop the radicalism that is happening,” writes Mauricio Pons, who says he’s the grandson of Cuban immigrants and was particularly disturbed by the College Republicans’ xenophobic tenor. “I’m sad to say that for nine months my efforts were futile and I left the group chat because of its toxicity and hate speech.”

The chats, which New Times received from an anonymous tipster in the group, show FIU’s College Republicans sharing memes calling the protesters injured and killed in Charlottesville by Nazis “snowflakes.” The group also discussed calling ICE on classmates who protested in favor of protecting young undocumented immigrants last week.

Here are the relatively innocuous chats that the Republicans were having with each other in what was apparently a private forum. You can read far more racist comments at Zerohedge, Yahoo, and a host of other websites that encourage free speech.

CLICK ON THE IMAGE TO ENLARGE.

It’s outrageous that an investigation has been launched by a university at the behest of meddling social justice warriors. For example, the students advocate building Trump’s wall. Are they going to be expelled for that?

More than 700 students have now signed a petition on Change.org demanding that Rosenberg discipline the group. The petition notes that school leaders began investigating a fraternity on campus only after New Times and other outlets reported on leaked chats from the frat showing members joking about rape and hazing.

“Since the College Republicans are not willing to discipline their own, we are calling on FIU to take immediate action so that our minority student population feels safe going to school,” the petition notes. “Threats of intimidation should not be taken lightly by our administration.”

The petition was started by FIU graduate student Allison Sardinas, an assistant for the Center for Women’s and Gender studies. Sardinas says she’s an advocate for immigrant communities and was one of the organizers of the walkout at FIU last week demanding Congress pass immigration protections for students.

SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIOR ALLISON SARDINAS HAS A HISTORY OF MAKING TROUBLE FOR PEOPLE SHE DISAGREES WITH.

“I believe the students violated the student code of conduct, particularly by threatening to deport specific students,” Sardinas says. “I think they should be put on at least probation before they’re allowed to be up and running again.”

She’s not alone. Students at FIU have been alarmed by the rhetoric in the chat.

“It’s hard to believe the fact that people are still dehumanizing other groups, especially at such a diverse university,” says Jamel Holt, a freshman at FIU. “I don’t think the statement about purchasing weapons should be taken lightly at all.” He also believes the school should consider an “in-depth” investigation rather than just blowing it off.

Adds freshman Ruth Artze: “It’s really unfortunate to see people have those hateful thoughts, especially when we’re a ‘Worlds Ahead’ school full of international students. It makes FIU a little more unsafe to students who already feel unsafe in this country under this administration.”

FBI: Anti-White Hate Crimes Are The Fastest Growing Racial Hate Crimes In America

The data on anti-white hate crimes may be so flawed as to be useless.

In following the news, there have been quite a few “hate crimes” against white people that were not written up as hate crimes, but rather as robberies gone bad and so forth..

Daily Caller

A new FBI report indicates that hate crimes committed against white Americans are the fastest growing racial hate crimes in the United States.

The FBI report on 2016 Hate Crime Statistics shows that in 2016, there were 876 reported anti-white hate crime offenses in the United States. In 2015, this number was 734, indicating a 19.34 percent increase.

There were more racial hate crime offenses altogether in 2016 compared to 2015.

There were 4,029 single-bias incidents that targeted “Race/Ethnicity/Ancestry” in 2015, compared to 4,229 in 2016.

Anti-Hispanic or Latino hate crimes also increased in 2016. In 2015, the number of offenses targeting Hispanic/Latino Americans was 379. In 2016, that increased to 449, an increase of 18.46 percent. Anti-Black hate crimes actually declined by three offenses.

Within religious hate crimes, there were also increases. Anti-Jewish hate crimes increased by 20 percent and anti-Islamic hate crimes increased by 26.57 percent. Anti-Catholic hate crimes also slightly increased.

Since Donald Trump’s election win, many mainstream media reports have centered on hate crimes being supposedly inspired by Donald Trump and his supporters. A number of these reports have turned out to be false.

Barbie’s first hijab: Meet the new Ibtihaj Muhammad doll

WILL BARBIE END UP IN A MUSLIM HAREM?

Barbie is a white doll. Let the Muslims invent their own dolls rather than steal a white girl and sell her into slavery in a Muslim harem.

Nonwhites have a name for this, picked up from (((you know who.))) It’s called cultural appropriation.

WGNTV

Mattel, which makes Barbie, announced Monday that the latest doll in its “Shero” collection will be modeled after Olympic fencer Ibtihaj Muhammad. In 2016, Muhammad became the first American to compete in the games while wearing a hijab.

“I’m proud to know that little girls everywhere can now play with a Barbie who chooses to wear hijab! This is a childhood dream come true,” Muhammad said in a tweet.

The news was announced at Glamour’s Women of the Year summit. The doll will go on sale in 2018.

Barbie has been working hard to make its collection of dolls more diverse in an effort to broaden the brand’s appeal.

In its most recent quarter, Mattel said Barbie sales were down 6% compared to last year.

The Shero line, which launched in 2015, includes dolls based on prominent women such as Olympic gymnast Gabby Douglas, model Ashley Graham, ballerina Misty Copeland, director Ava DuVernay and actress Zendaya.

In 2016, Barbie rolled out tall, petite and curvy versions of the dolls.

The company followed suit with Ken dolls earlier this year. Barbie’s boyfriend is now available in three body types and seven skin tones.

“Ibtihaj is an inspiration to countless girls who never saw themselves represented, and by honoring her story, we hope this doll reminds them that they can be and do anything,” Sejal Shah Miller, Barbie’s vice president of global marketing, said in a statement.

Mattel is cheapening their product by doing this nonsense.

The story states that Ken comes in three body types and seven skin tones.

Does anyone know if that means there’s a fat, sloppy Nog named Ken sitting on the store shelves? Has anyone ever met a black of any type named Ken? Does black Ken rape and murder white Barbie?

Yale Removes White Men’s Portraits from Hall to Promote Diversity

STEPHEN DAVIS, MASTER OF YALE’S PIERSON COLLEGE.

When they plan to exterminate you, they don’t want you looking down on them from a picture on the wall.

The College Fix

Yale University is trying to explain its intentions when it took down portraits of white men who served as head of a residential college ahead of a Halloween party.

Stephen Davis, the current head of Pierson College, claims that an email he sent to students last week has been “misrepresented” as saying the white men’s portraits would not be put back up in the dining hall.

Davis ignored two separate requests this week to provide the email he sent students before giving The College Fix a copy of the message after this article was published.

The Yale Daily News has also not answered a Fix query on whether its Monday report was incorrect or whether Davis asked “the nation’s oldest college daily newspaper” to subtly change its reporting in an article Wednesday.

‘Abundance of images of white men around campus’

The implication of Monday’s report by the News was that the white men’s portraits were being removed permanently from Pierson’s dining hall because they weren’t diverse enough.

They were taken down “in preparation for” Pierson’s annual Halloween party, known as Inferno, but Davis only told students Nov. 1 that unlike previous years, they “will not be remounted,” the News said, paraphrasing the Davis email.

In place of those portraits, students would paint each other’s portraits at a Nov. 6 “study break” hosted by Sam Messer, associate dean of the art school and chair of the Committee on Art in Public Spaces, and hang them “temporarily” in the dining hall, according to the News report. It’s the only mention in the article of a temporary change.

The News framed the study break as a discussion of “what kinds of values, identities and accomplishments are important to honor in public art.”

While the paintings were not removed due to “ongoing discussions surrounding diversity on campus,” as the News paraphrased Yale College Dean Marvin Chun, they were taken down “amid wider conversations about how the abundance of images of white men around campus affect Yale’s inclusivity,” the News wrote.

In the article, Davis says the portraits would be mounted in the Pierson Fellows’ Lounge and plaques describing the “historical context of each” would soon be added. It does not say they would return to the dining hall.

‘Allow me to clarify’

Davis told The Fix in an email Wednesday that the Monday News article “misrepresented” both his “words” and his “intentions,” claiming he never said the white men’s portraits would “not be remounted.”

The report “generated some misperceptions,” Davis said, so he sent a message to the college community to provide “clarifications.”

Davis pointed The Fix to Pierson’s website for his message, which took the form of a Tuesday evening Facebook post.

“In my recent conversations with students, fellows, and alums, it is clear to me that some misperceptions were generated by my email last week and by Monday’s YDN article, whose headline presented this as a decision to ‘remove’ the portraits,” Davis wrote: “Allow me to clarify.”

He said he had always planned to have the white men’s portraits reinstalled after the study break. The walls would only remain empty “temporarily in the immediate aftermath” of the Inferno party, “as a site of reflection.”

I’m not sure that Stephen Davis is as anti-white as the story makes him out to be. Back in May he removed an Asian woman from a position of responsibility for her nasty anti-white remarks on social media. Read more about Davis’ termination of June Chu here.

What is a sure thing is that the fixation on diversity has created a horrible learning atmosphere for any white student just about anywhere. Instead of teaching subject matter, corrupted colleges and universities are focused on indoctrination. At my former university we were told over and over by administrators that America was turning nonwhite and that all our energies needed to be devoted to making sure that Hispanics got their degrees in a timely fashion. It was never clear what we were supposed to do other than make the exams easier, grade on the curve, and give group assignments and grades.