Mother of Five Adult Children Claims the Kids are OK with Her Sugar Baby Lifestyle

As you read the story of Suzanne Thatcher’s travel adventures, ask yourself if men are really this stupid, and if they are, why.

I had sugar babies in my classes at the university, but they were young and they had sex with their sugar daddies.

Suzanne Thatcher is old and she claims not to do anything with her sugar daddies that make her feel “uncomfortable.” All of her talk about separate rooms while traveling with men who pick up the tab for her expenses leaves me shaking my head.

New York Post

Meet the mom-of-five traveling the world in style thanks to the rich men she meets online.

Suzanne Thatcher, 52, has journeyed first class to luxurious hotels in destinations across Italy and the US – all paid for by men she’s met via a dating website.

Thatcher, from Florida, said: “Men I’ve met through online dates have enabled me to see some amazing places, but I’ve also made some good friends.

“My friends laughed at first but now I’ve even persuaded some of my male friends to sign up to find travel companions themselves.”

Thatcher insists that she is honest with the men she dates from the off, making it clear that the pair will have separate rooms on their trips and that she won’t do anything she doesn’t feel comfortable with.

Continue reading

Gallup Survey Shows Americans Becoming More Accepting of Moral Degeneracy

You may recall a group in the 1980s fronted by the Reverend Jerry Falwell called the Moral Majority.

Today it would have to be renamed the Moral Minority.

Americans today accept acts that my grandmother and her religious leaders would have condemned. In fact, much of what is acceptable today would have not even crossed my grandmother’s mind. She read the Bible every day and attended church at least three times a week.

Let’s remember that until the Supreme Court’s Lawrence decision in 2003 that homosexual acts were illegal in Texas (and some other states as well).

Not everyone on the alt-right is a traditionalist, but many of us are. We’ve lost the battle to preserve almost everything traditional, but maybe not the war, as society slowly falls apart while living on fake Federal Reserve money. When the big financial crisis hits, there will be nothing like the mother of all economic collapses to bring back traditionalism.

Star-Tribune

Over the past decade and a half, tolerance for polygamy has more than doubled among the American public. A similar trend applies to human cloning.

Stunning as they are, these findings from the latest Gallup survey of moral opinion in the U.S. may tell more about the political future than the daily drama surrounding President Donald Trump.

To be sure, the percentage declaring polygamy and human cloning “morally acceptable,” in Gallup’s phrase, remains small: Seventeen percent are OK with the former; 14 percent, the latter. Neither is likely to become legal soon.

Yet the speed with which these formerly fringe ideas have moved toward the mainstream is significant and consistent with Gallup’s broader finding: Since 2001, there has been a clear and, apparently, irreversible, move toward more permissive or, to use Gallup’s word, “liberal” social norms.

“Libertarian” might be a better term. Gallup documents what can only be called a strong live-and-let-live consensus regarding several practices — birth control, divorce, sex between unmarried adults, gay or lesbian relations, out-of-wedlock childbearing — that within living memory were either fiercely contested or taboo. All garnered at least 62 percent acceptance in the poll, conducted just a month ago. Doctor-assisted suicide is trending up and now stands at 57 percent acceptance.

Taboos are weakening against pornography (acceptance up six points to 36 percent since 2011) and sex between teenagers (acceptance up four points to 36 percent since 2013). Meanwhile, new taboos are developing against wearing fur and medical testing on animals. Only adultery remains as unacceptable as in 2001; just 9 percent tolerate it.

In short, the culture wars may be ending in victory for progressives, with the caveat that a left-right frame is misleading regarding some issues — opposition to pornography, for example, has been a rare point of agreement between the religious right and left-wing feminists.

Americans are not only far more willing to countenance formerly taboo practices, they are also much less interested in government protection of “traditional values” than they were in the not-so-distant past.

It has been six years since another poll, by CNN/ORC, found for the first time that more Americans said the government should “not favor any set of values” rather than “promote traditional values.”

As of the most recent poll, in late 2014, 55 percent preferred a value-neutral government. No one would have predicted that just after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, when CNN/ORC found that 59 percent of Americans favored government promotion of traditional values, an all-time high.

Maybe that galvanizing moment gave way to the multiple disappointments and disillusions of the Iraq war and the financial crisis, which in turn bred broader doubts about government’s ability to do anything right, let alone foster moral values, and perhaps about the values themselves.

Another explanation, though, is that Gallup’s numbers confirm a long-standing postwar trend first identified by political scientist Ronald Inglehart of the University of Michigan, who has argued that Western societies’ turn from traditional values to individual autonomy and self-expression reflects their growing economic security, notwithstanding periodic wars and recessions.

The satisfaction of basic material needs, on a consistent basis, provides time and space for cultural, sexual and spiritual experimentation. Conversely, Inglehart has argued, members of society who feel least secure, materially and otherwise, continue to derive meaning from tradition and react against perceived threats to it emanating from the political sphere.

One interpretation of the overwhelming support of the country’s most religious, tradition-minded voters for a thrice-married, hedonistic tycoon is that it demonstrates their desperation to stop the progressive cultural wave.

Then again, data from Gallup and other sources show such wide moral acceptance of nontraditional norms that the new consensus must include plenty of Trump voters as well. The main exceptions to that consensus are abortion and gun control, about which a relatively even and highly partisan divide persists — and which candidate Trump exploited to win over red-state voters who might otherwise have distrusted him.

Jews in academia and media preaching tolerance for every vice and hatred for every virtue are not even mentioned in any of the analyses of moral degeneracy you’ll see in the MSM. I’m sure Professor Inglehard thinks he’s on to something with his economic theory of vice, and there’s probably some truth to it, but to ignore the Jewish role in perversion and degeneracy is disingenuous.

TODAY WITH MILEY CYRUS, THE NEW FACE OF MORALITY.

BACK IN THE DAY WITH CONNIE FRANCIS.

How do you know it’s love? (Educational Film)

This 1950 educational film is a trip down memory lane to what life was like almost 70 years ago in white America.

American young people are taught good values by their elders, who are confident that good morals will lead to a lifetime of happiness with the opposite sex.

There’s not a homosexual, lesbian, or nonwhite to be seen anywhere.

Again, as in a previous film featured here, the relationship between the teen girl and her mother is interesting.

Uploaded on Nov 6, 2010

Gives students a basis for thinking clearly about real love and shows that mere conviction of love is not enough to insure lasting happiness. A drama.

Christian teacher who quoted Bible saying gay people ‘deserve to die,’ in letter to student newspaper RESIGNS

A LETTER TO THE EDITOR HAD DEVASTATING CONSEQUENCES FOR TEACHER MICHAEL STACK, INCLUDING DEATH THREATS.

The hatred of God and of Christians is strongly in evidence in America 2017. Americans, far too many of them, worship Satan. Not that they necessarily engage in Satanic rituals, but rather they reject any and all morality. Substituting for morality in their world is egalitarianism. No immoral act can ever be condemned (except for murder and even there euthanasia and abortion are accepted and applauded).

Foolish Americans, who make up at least half or more of the population, have succeeded in silencing the other half. Advocating for God and for morality can not only cost you your job, but create potentially fatal consequences ranging from stress to being murdered.

San Luis Obispo

In a letter to the student newspaper, a San Luis Obispo High School teacher quoted a Bible verse saying that people committing homosexual acts “deserve to die,” drawing outrage and concern from students, teachers and parents, and a call for calm by administrators.

Mayor Heidi Harmon urged community members to complain to the school district administration. “This is unacceptable,” Harmon wrote on her Facebook page Wednesday. “A teacher at SLO High wrote this shaming letter against the LGBT community — a community that already has a high degree of suicide.”

The school won’t discipline special education teacher Michael Stack, saying teachers as well as students “do not shed their First Amendment rights” at school.

MICHAEL STACK.

“A bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment is that the government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea offensive or disagreeable,” San Luis Coastal Unified School District Superintendent Eric Prater and Principal Leslie O’Connor said in a joint statement Wednesday.

“As a district, we understand that students do not shed their First Amendment rights at school, and we respect the rights of our students to speak on controversial topics. We applaud the high school’s commitment to open dialogue and a free exchange of ideas in its student newspaper,” the statement read. “ … In a similar manner, we acknowledge the right of our staff to voice their opinions.”

Prater and O’Connor called the controversy “a teachable moment” and urged the community to conduct a “civil discourse.”

The statement went on to say that Stack was a probationary teacher in his first year at the campus. At O’Connor’s recommendation, the district decided in February not to keep him on staff for the upcoming school year.

Stack left campus early Wednesday and could not be reached for comment.

His letter was published Tuesday in Expressions, the school’s journalism website, and was in response to Expressions’ May 2017 print edition featuring lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer issues — including an interview with an LGBTQ couple about their relationship.

Stack wrote that he was compelled to speak out because he “didn’t want to displease God,” saying the Bible is “without error” and its hundreds of predictions are 100 percent accurate.

Since the story of Michael Stack’s letter broke in the press, he’s resigned and received death threats.

San Luis Obispo

A San Luis Obispo High School teacher has resigned in the face of widespread outrage over a letter he wrote to the school student newspaper that cited a Biblical passage saying those who commit homosexual acts “deserve to die.”

Special education teacher Michael Stack did not show up to work Thursday but sent the school an email at 1:07 p.m., which he also copied to Fox News, tendering his resignation, noting “the community apparently wants me out, so I hereby grant them their desires.”

Late Thursday morning, someone called the school and threatened Stack’s life, according to San Luis Coastal Unified School District Superintendent Eric Prater.

Choosing For Happiness – 1950 Dating Social Guidance For Women / Educational Documentary

An interesting look at white female college students and how they allegedly thought about marriage, boys, the family, and so forth.

Men looking for a good wife have it tough today. From this film, I take it that men had it tough back in the day.

Less than 13 minutes.

Published on Jun 30, 2012

Dating advice for young women in the 1950’s. .

A single gene has been linked with being a psychopath

With enough research touching on the taboo subject of race, it might be proved conclusively that a high percentage of blacks carry the MAOA-L gene, the gene that allegedly is associated with psychopathy.

If we knew that a black newborn carried the psychopath gene, would it be wise to kill it or try to develop a vaccine to prevent the psychopathic behaviors that would come later? Alternatively, should carriers of the psychopath gene be sterilized so that it cannot be passed along to new generations?

Morality and science mix when it comes to some genetic traits and the modern push for eugenics.

Here’s what we know:

Business Insider

As of yet, no single factor can explain what causes people to behave in ways labeled psychopathic. But research suggests our genes may play a role.

One gene in particular is linked with an increased risk of violent or aggressive behavior, studies have found.

Known as MAOA (monoamine oxidase A), this “warrior gene” controls the production of a protein that breaks down brain-signaling chemicals like dopamine, noradrenalin, and serotonin, which all influence mood.

But the idea of a “psychopath” gene remains controversial.

A gene for psychopathy?
People with a variant of the gene, called MAOA-L, produce less of the protein that breaks down these signaling chemicals, which in turn causes them to build up. An excess of these chemicals, scientists believe, leads to impulsive behavior (such as as hypersexuality), sleep disorders, mood swings, and violent tendencies.

James Fallon, a neuroscientist at the UC Irvine School of Medicine, was studying the brains of murderers and other violent criminals who are thought to be psychopaths, when he accidentally found out he might be one.

Not only did his brain scans look suspiciously like those of the murderers, he later found out that he also possesses the MAOA-L gene that’s been linked to aggression and antisocial behavior.

Psychopaths are often described as having a lack of empathy. They may understand when others are in need or in pain, but they don’t feel it viscerally the way most people do. Fallon can identify with that. “I don’t get the interpersonal warm and fuzzies,” he told Business Insider in an interview earlier this month.

But simply having the MAOA-L gene isn’t enough to make someone a psychopath. The environment someone is exposed to is likely very important too.

Fallon thinks that the reason he turned out to be a realitvely normal, nonviolent person, despite having this gene, is that he had a good upbringing. But growing up in a harsher environment could have tipped him toward a darker path. “If [the brain] sees a hostile world, the only way to survive is to be hostile,” Fallon said, whereas “if it sees a normal world, it will be normal.”

And some research supports this idea. One 2002 study followed a large group of male children from birth to adulthood who were abused or maltreated. The study found that boys who had a particular version of the MAOA gene grew up to be more antisocial, compared with those who had a different version of the gene.

And this kind of genetic evidence is starting to make its way into the justice system. In 2009, an Italian appeals court shortened the sentence of a convicted murderer by a year because he had the version of the MAOA gene associated with violence.

Not that simple
But experts have warned against drawing conclusions about a person’s character based on this gene alone.

“We don’t know how the whole genome functions and the [possible] protective effects of other genes,” Giuseppe Novelli, a forensic scientist and geneticist at the University Tor Vergata in Rome, told Nature News.

What’s more, the same gene could have different effects in people of different ethnicities. A 2006 study in the United States found that abused children who had high levels of the MAOA that breaks down brain signals were less likely to commit violent crimes, but only if they were white.

So while it’s tempting to reduce a complex psychiatric disorder like psychopathy to a single gene, it’s almost certainly not that simple.

This video explains the issue, summmarized as nature vs nurture.

Another one:

Also see Conservative Headlines. to read an article relating that whites have a lower level of the psychopath gene.

Teacher Bought Gun for Student to Take Care of Sex Tape Blackmailers

KATHRYN HAGEN. THE MARRIED TEACHER HAD THE HOTS FOR A STUDENT.

The Indy Star has revealed teacher Hagen’s text messages to an unidentified student that she had sex with in the home she shared with her husband. Calling the teen “super hot,” she wanted more.

What she got was arrested instead. Apparently the teen secretly made a 10 second tape of the two of them having sex and passed it around school to be used to force Hagen to give higher grades to the students.

Let’s pick up the story with The Sun

A MARRIED teacher has been accused of sleeping with one pupil and buying another a gun to silence blackmailers after she featured in a sex tape.

Kathryn Hagan, 38, has resigned from a US school after being charged with a string of sex, drug and weapon offences.

The stunned mum of the student she allegedly bedded revealed: “When I read the charges I was physically sick.

“It’s an extreme betrayal. I’m very disappointed. I’m angry and I’m hurt that it got to this point.”

Her son, 17, said he had dinner with Hagan and her husband at the couple’s home last month and she gave him an anti-depressant when he got a headache.

She asked him back three days later and they had sex in their bedroom, he told police.

She reportedly texted him afterwards: “I enjoyed kissing you yesterday.”

Hagan is said to have begged the boy to keep their relationship a secret, but told him she would not treat him differently in school.

One message said: “I enjoyed our time together but want to be extra cautious. Please be sure to delete everything wherever it can be deleted.”

Another said: “I need to get laid sometime soon.”

Hagan bragged about a love-bite on her neck, court papers allege, while further texts to the teen over the next week said: “Hey cutie, I was thinking maybe we call in sick to school on Friday and meet up at my house for the day.”

Three days later, the lad’s mum is said to have found out about the relationship and tipped off authorities at Franklin Central High in Indianapolis, Indiana.

Hagan resigned the same day – just three months after starting there in January.

Detectives then uncovered more alleged crimes after another student told them about a ten-second video circulating around the school showing naked Hagan and the teen having sex.

Some kids tried to use the footage to blackmail Hagan into giving them better grades, court documents said.

She apparently vented her frustration to one 16-year-old, texting him: “I didn’t realise it was a scam to pass my class. Plus, I can’t believe I gave him Xanax. Just a few so he could get some good sleep.”

The boy is said to have told Hagan he would “rob them all but I don’t have a gun” – and then asked her to get him one so he could “take care of it.”

Hagan bought a 9mm handgun and ammunition on the same day she resigned and gave it to the student, according to court documents.

She faces charges of conspiracy to commit armed robbery, two counts of child seduction, dangerous control of a firearm and dealing in a controlled substance.

The mother of the 17-year-old student said: “There’s a lot more involved than what I initially had known. There’s a lot more involved than what my son had known.

“It physically made me ill.”

According the the Indy Star, Hagen suggested to the student that she bought the gun for that he could murder the students who were blackmailing her, after he robbed them of their phones that contained the sex tape.

Hagen is not ugly, but rather a plain woman who fell into society’s trap of valuing herself by who she could have sex with. Her foolishness should cost her a husband, any children she might have, her teaching career, and her freedom.

By now, these teachers should know that they can’t get away with it. But they still keep doing it.