Black as Coal Africans Settled in Germany Steal Millions in Welfare

Haha. The German authorities ASSUMED that the blacks who illegally entered the country were honest and thus they did no control for fraud.

How dumb can white people be?

If a scam can be devised, an African will do it. They’ll do anything to avoid an honest days’ work. The problem I think is that their minds lack the discipline to be able to sit down all day and concentrate on a task and do that task well. The thrill of scamming plus the opportunity to lay around or hang out with their own kind motivates them to criminality.

New Observer Online

Africans from the Sudan pretending to be refugees in Germany have stolen millions of euros in welfare payments in an elaborate scam set up to dupe race-blind liberals, it has emerged.

The swindle—which is likely only the tip of the iceberg—was uncovered in the northern city of Braunschweig last week, and involves invaders using multiple “identities” to draw multiple payments.

According to German media, the swindle in Braunschweig involved more than 300 Sudanese invaders, who have stolen at least €5 million since arriving in Germany in 2015.

A commission set up to “investigate” the fraud said that the nonwhites had registered themselves several times in different locations in order to receive multiple welfare payments.

Commission chairman Joern Memenga said that most of the invaders had succeeded in their efforts by using basic disguises to create three or four different identities.

“Sometimes just growing a beard, or putting on a pair of glasses, having shorter hair, but always different surnames,” Memenga said, ignoring the other fact that the Africans’ physical similarity—and the German officials’ inability to tell them apart—must have greatly aided the scam.

“They simply registered themselves several times,” Memenga said, “To some extent with the same members of staff.” At the height of the invasion, the officials were registering 2,000 nonwhites everyday as “refugees.”

In many early cases, the invaders registered with no papers—mainly because most threw away their identification documents with the intention of fooling the liberals.

The race-blind German officials were “registering” the nonwhites with only a photograph, and not even bothering to take fingerprints.

According to the German Asylum Seekers Act, every “asylum seeker” receives €135 “pocket money” and an additional €216 a month to cover “necessary personal needs”—this in addition to housing, medical, and other basic costs.

“Excluding the cost of electricity, you reach about €320 to 350 per alias identity and person,” Memenga said.

On average, each fraud suspect cheated authorities out of thousands of euros. In one case, one invader had 12 identities. “He had received some €45,000 illegally,” the commission chairman said.

The system was also susceptible to rigging because the civil servants did not have time to sift through all of the applications processed at other municipalities in Lower Saxony, so the same “asylum seeker” could collect money from different places.

Eventually, one of the employees noticed that some of the men in the photos looked strikingly similar and sounded the alarm, reporting his suspicions to the police.

Authorities are now investigating how far the swindle extends, and expect to uncover many other cases as the review spreads out to other states and regions.

How about I make it easy for German police. If it’s a Nagger, it’s a swindler and con arrest. Arrest them all. Deport them all.


Racists Anonymous Group Touted as One of Several Cures for “White Privilege”


Does it make you feel guilty because you object to your own extermination by a hostile elite?

If so, then you too can join Racists Anonymous and receive counseling by blacks who can help you overcome your “racism.” We all know that blacks can NEVER be racists, so their wise and wonderful counsel will undoubtedly do wonders for you.

Heatstreet reports that a black pastor, the Reverend Ron Buford, created the 12 step organization.

Buford says we’re all racists. I suggest he speak for himself. When you ignore race, you do so at your own peril. Don’t believe me? Ignore the fact that blacks do most of the murders in Chicongo and see how long you escape being shot.

Legal Insurrection

Last week, we covered the videoptaped torture of a mentally disabled Chicago teen at the hands of 4 black thugs, who taunted him with anti-white and anti-Trump insults.

Meanwhile, progressives are still fighting the vast, alt-Right conspiracy whenever and wherever they can. For example, now there is a “Racists Anonymous” group, an Alcoholics Anonymous-type organization offering a recovery program for people struggling with their “white privilege”.

The program is the brainchild of Reverend Ron Buford, a black pastor who worried that conversations about race left him angry and white participants guilty. He says he realized the need for the self-improvement program after witnessing Trump’s rise to power.

Racists Anonymous is a 12-step program, and meetings begin with everyone in the room announcing that they are, in fact a racist (step one is, of course, admitting you have a problem). The white people in the group discuss their experiences with their own racism, minority attendees discuss experiences encountering racism in society.

Fascinating. I would be interested to learn about how the Chicago teen felt about his “white privilege” while his scalp was being lacerated with a knife by his abusers.


But “Racists Anonymous” isn’t the only special, new offering for race-conscious liberals. You can now purchase a racial indulgence in the form of a Safety Pin Box.

Spend between $25 and $100 a month to receive a box that helps you be a better ally. That’s the business plan set up by Grand Rapids, Michigan entrepreneurs Marissa Johnson and Leslie Mac, at least.

Every month, they send their subscribers the Safety Pin Box, which Vice reporter Evan McMorris-Santoro describes as being “designed to wake up white people to the realities of being black in America.”

…The Box has only a few hundred subscribers (it would be fun to do a pool estimating how many of them are white Brooklyn liberals), Johnson and Mac are donating some of the proceeds to black female activists, and liberals and lefties themselves have been highly critical of the exercise.

Finally, in conjunction with the Women’s March on Washington, there is the Complicity Cleanse. The goal of this activity is lofty: Freeing yourself from the “triumph of patriarchy, sexism, xenophobia, heterosexism”…and, of course, racism.

After you sign up, you will be sent a “menu” that contains a daily dose of information, resources, questions, actions, challenges– little things to do every single day. The idea is to create a platform of presence in order to forge habits that divest our complicity from the mechanisms of oppression. Once we are aware of our entanglements, we can earnestly begin to dismantle all that allows for the pernicious “-isms” of American identity. Everything on the menu is a suggestion, that will hopefully become a contemplation, a conversation, an act, and eventually an awakened pattern. Little by little we will lesson our enurement with white supremacist, patriarchal rule, and our complicity in the suffering of others.


No word on whether you have to wear a Pussy Hat when you take that cleanse, however.


“America’s Rabbi:” Dylann Roof Deserves to Die Like All Racists

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach

Muh rabbi, Shumuley Boteach, self-proclaimed as America’s rabbi, preaches death to racists.

He’s also given us permission to hate, although that’s not his intention. But he certainly preaches that it’s right to hate in his statements about Dylann Roof.

So, with Rabbi Boteach’s permission, let’s hate Zionists, ZOG, blacks, wetbacks, dotheads, sand niggers, and every other vile creature that wishes us to die off.

Feel the hate. Revel in it. Muh rabbi says it’s a good thing.

Times of Israel

Dylann Roof was condemned to death by a Federal jury. It is a just sentence befitting a monster who murdered nine African-Americans in the middle of Bible study at a South Carolina church.

We should feel no guilt for his sentence and have no reservations about carrying out. He deserves to die.

What Roof deserves is our contempt, our vitriol, our hatred.

I declare unreservedly that I hate him and everything he stands for. Why are we so reluctant to declare our hatred for odious, racist murderers? Where is the visceral abhorrence and detestation for monsters?

It wasn’t always thus.

Abraham Lincoln had no hesitation declaring his hatred for the abomination of slavery. In 1854, in Peoria he said, “I cannot but hate slavery. I hate it because of the monstrous injustice of slavery itself.” Churchill said openly that “I hate no man but Hitler.” And because he hated the beast, he inspired a nation to fight him. The French, who did not hate Hitler, collaborated with him and sent Jews to the gas chambers instead.

It seems that hatred has gone out of vogue.

Let my Christian brothers speak of loving one’s enemies. I will confess my admiration for my loving African-American brothers and sisters — many of them family members of Roof’s victims — who came together in South Carolina to forgive the killer after his murderous rampage.

But for all their moral greatness, they are still wrong. We have an obligation to hate evil and never forgive it lest it be permitted to spread. We must fight it instead.

Let my Catholic friends tell me to turn the other cheek. When it comes to racist mass murderers like Roof, I cannot but reject both New Testament teachings and instead embrace Solomon’s proclamation in Proverbs: “The fear of the Lord is to hate evil.” I will welcome what King David said regarding the wicked: “I have hated them with a deep loathing. They are as enemies to me.”

The kind of man who could storm into a church and pump worshippers with bullets is not a man at all. He is a beast, pure and simple. He may once have been created in the image of God. But he has since erased every last vestige of God’s image from his countenance. He is no longer our human brother. He is a bloodthirsty animal.

Loving the victim of a crime generates compassion for suffering. But hating the perpetrators generates action to stop the orgy of murder. While innocence should evoke compassion, evil should evoke only contempt and the determination that it be eradicated.


If you’re a regular reader you know that I preach righteous hate here. It’s good to see the Rabbi agree with me.

Paleomasculinist Responds to Bitchy Feminist Mocking Masturbation

The Tweet above reminds me that sex robots have been in the news lately, along with all other manner of sexual behaviors. The cultural Marxist assault on morality roars along at warp speed now.

I’m not recommending that men form relationships with sex robots or sex dolls, but the constant taunting of men by feminists is going to backfire on them.

Certainly, Muslim males don’t put up with women’s sh*t, although as we’ve seen in a few stories posted here, white feminist SJWs believe it’s a good thing to be raped by Muzzies. It takes away their white guilt through some mysterious, insane process of redemption.

As the Tweet suggests, sex robots are an alternative to both masturbation and putting up with bitchy, unloving, unkind feminist whores. There’s still a problem for men, however.

Sex robots as marriage partners or lovers offer a cowardly way of life. There are significant MORAL ISSUES akin to the issues associated with having sex with animals or dead people. In short, I think we need to think twice about taking an amoral perspective on sexual relationships with robots.

The only real answer to the woes imposed on our culture by Jewish feminism is to destroy feminism. Taking away women’s rights to a degree and imposing on women a moral perspective on life is the only thing that can remake our culture into something decent.

That naked feminist and her stupid sign above is rightly mocked and ridiculed. Disempower her.


In the face of AI exerts repeatedly predicting the rise of sex robots, it’s increasingly difficult to insist that such machines strictly belong to a far-off, dystopian future. But some robotics experts predict we’ll soon be doing far more than having sexual intercourse with machines. Instead, we’ll be making love to them—with all the accompanying romantic feelings.

At this week’s “Love and Sex with Robots” conference at Goldsmith University in London, David Levy, author of a book on human-robot love, predicted that human-robot marriages would be legal by 2050. Adrian Cheok, computing professor at City University London and director of the Mixed Reality Lab in Singapore, says the prediction is not so farfetched.

Uh-oh, my Jewdar just went off.


“That might seem outrageous because it’s only 35 years away. But 35 years ago people thought homosexual marriage was outrageous,” says Cheok, who also spoke at the conference. “Until the 1970s, some states didn’t allow white and black people to marry each other. Society does progress and change very rapidly.”

And though human-robot marriage might not be legal until 2050, Cheok believes humans will be living with robot partners long before then.

Though Cheok acknowledges that sex robots could fulfill sexist male sexual fantasies, he believes robot-human marriages will have an overwhelmingly positive effect on society. “People assume that everyone can get married, have sex, fall in love. But actually many don’t,” he says. And even those who do might be in search of a different option. “A lot of human marriages are very unhappy,” Cheok says. “Compared to a bad marriage, a robot will be better than a human.”

Notice that the author promoting sex with robots is a (((Jew))). Typical. Jews are leading whites down another dead end road that will lead to our extinction.

Although white men are demonized by feminists at the Huffington Post, on college campuses, on TV and the movies, we need to hang together and get our balls out of asses (sorry for the crude way of putting it) and confront these nasty women, as well as the Jews who seek our death as a race.

Just as importantly, we need to appreciate the good women in our lives.


Italian Slut Who Promised “No” Voters a Bl*wJob Following Through with “Oral Sex” Tour of Italy

Video or else this story is probably not true.

What we have is another in a long line of attention whores who use sex to become famous, like Kim Kardashian.

Before getting too excited over your “dream girl” ask youself what manner of STDs she’s been infected with. You better also put out of your mind all the ugly, black as coal Africans lined up for servicing too.

An Italian glamour model who vowed to give a blow job to everyone who voted ‘No’ in the referendum said she is ‘a little bit tired’ after completing the first leg of her oral sex tour.

Which is realistically no big surprise considering 19 million people voted No in the election which decided the future of Italy’s constitution.

According to Paola Saulino, the first step of her ‘Pompa’ tour, which took place in Rome, is done.

And for all those questioning whether or not she had actually stuck to her promise, one happy recipient appeared to defend the star online by stating ‘It’s all true!’

Following the vote, Paola made sure that her followers knew she was serious, adding that the tour would go ahead as she is ‘a woman of my word.’

On Facebook she said, ‘Love you guys! I’m not kidding I just want you thank you in my personal way.’

Saulino claims her 10-city tour will finish in Palermo on January 21.

And she’s making the most of her new found fame – by selling ‘Pompa Tour’ t-shirts and coffee cups at the events.

This publicity stunt should garner Paola new male fans. It may also help her launch a career in politics, where sex and legislating do often mix as a matter of routine.

Drexel Backtracks on White Genocide Professor


University professors nation-wide have been given the green light to advocate for white genocide.

George Ciccariello-Maher has had the original rebuke by Drexel University replaced by a bullsh*t claim that he was just joking.

He can go back to indoctrinating students in the Communist philosophy, as well as teaching them that the mass murder of white people is a good thing.

Advice to professors: Don’t try advocating for the murder of blacks or Jews. It’s not the same in the eyes of academia.

Inside Higher Ed

On Thursday, Drexel issued a new statement. The new statement offers milder criticism of Ciccariello-Maher and notes that there may be multiple ways to read his tweet. The statement says that “his words, taken at face value and shared in the constricted Twitter format, do not represent the values of inclusion and understanding espoused by Drexel University.”

Further, the new statement says that “the wide range of reactions to his tweets suggests that his intentions were not adequately conveyed.

These responses underscore the importance of choosing one’s words thoughtfully and exercising appropriate judgment in light of the inherent limitations presented by communications on social media.”
In contrast, the original statement said: “Professor Ciccariello-Maher’s comments are utterly reprehensible, deeply disturbing, and do not in any way reflect the values of the university.”

On academic freedom, the new statement also struck a different tone.

The original statement said that “the university recognizes the right of its faculty to freely express their thoughts and opinions in public debate,” but it also said that Drexel “is taking this situation very seriously” and was setting up a meeting with the professor. Those comments led many to question whether the university was in fact defending the professor’s right to free expression or discouraging it.

The new statement is much more specific that the tweet in question was free speech. “The university vigorously supports the right of its faculty members and students to freely express their opinions in the course of academic debate and discussion. In this vein, we recognize Professor Ciccariello-Maher’s tweets as protected speech.”

Drexel’s president and provost — John A. Fry and M. Brian Blake, respectively — signed the new statement but not the old one.

The new statement also notes challenges posed by social media. “Very often electronic forms of communication (Twitter, in particular) are limited in their ability to communicate satire, irony and context, especially when referencing a horror like genocide.”

More than 9,000 people have signed a petition (circulated prior to the release of Thursday’s statement by Drexel) that said: “Let Drexel know — in the midst of the deafening, organized troll-storm — that racist trolls deserve no platform in dictating academic discourse, let alone the off-duty tweets of academics. They are being VERY noisy; we can’t be silent.”

Many other groups and authors have been critical of the original Drexel statement. A blog post by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education said that the university “failed” to defend academic freedom. A blog post at Reason, a libertarian publication, said: “Even if Ciccariello-Maher isn’t formally disciplined, the experience of being called before the administration to answer for his tweet-crimes is a form of silencing.”

Hank Reichman, professor emeritus of history at California State University at East Bay and chair of the AAUP’s Committee A on Academic Freedom and Tenure, wrote on the AAUP blog that the university’s original response was “simply wrong.”


Mormon Tabernacle Choir Singer Quits Rather than Seranade the New Hitler, Trump

Jan Chamberlin, the woman pictured in the Tweet above, is an idiot. The words in the Tweet condemn her effectively. Trump’s civic nationalism is so far from Hitler’s National Socialism that you have to wonder if this weak-minded fool gets her fake news from CNN or MSNBC.

Her church, the Mormon Church, is an active participant in white genocide through its support of open borders. It’s motivation is money and a chance to convert a few Mexicans and other nonwhites.

Salt Lake Tribune

The Mormon Tabernacle Choir’s acceptance of the invitation to sing at Donald Trump’s inauguration has spawned widespread debate among the faithful and thousands of signatures on a petition demanding the decision’s reversal.

Now the choir’s participation has even more fallout: the resignation of a female singer.

“Since ‘the announcement,’ I have spent several sleepless nights and days in turmoil and agony. I have reflected carefully on both sides of the issue, prayed a lot, talked with family and friends, and searched my soul,” Jan Chamberlin wrote in a resignation letter to the choir president and choir members. “I’ve tried to tell myself that by not going to the inauguration, that I would be able to stay in choir for all the other good reasons. I’ve tried to tell myself that it will be all right and that I can continue in good conscience before God and man.”

But she could not do it, Chamberlin said in the letter, she later posted on Facebook. “I could never look myself in the mirror again with self-respect.”

The choir’s participation in the inauguration would “severely damage” its “image and networking,” she said, adding that many “good people throughout this land and throughout the world already do and will continue to feel betrayed. … I know that I too feel betrayed.”

For the singer, it is a moral issue, she wrote. “I only know I could never ‘throw roses to Hitler.’ And I certainly could never sing for him.”

Chamberlin, who said she has been with the choir for five years, did not respond to interview requests and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints declined to comment on her status in the famed group or on how many others might have dropped out or complained.

“Participation in the choir, including the performance at the Inauguration, is voluntary,” church spokesman Eric Hawkins reiterated in a statement Thursday. “Only a limited number of choir members are participating (the number is limited by the inaugural committee), and none are required to participate.”

LDS leaders announced the decision to perform last week. Not all 360 singers will make the trip, but church officials have said about 215 are expected to volunteer.

The choir previously sang at swearing-in ceremonies for George H. W. Bush (1989), Richard Nixon (1969) and Lyndon Johnson (1965). It performed in inaugural parades for George W. Bush (2001), George H. W. Bush (1989) and Ronald Reagan (1981).

Soon after the announcement about the choir’s appearance at Trump’s Jan. 20 event, Randall Thacker, a lifetime Mormon and past president of Affirmation, a support organization for gay Latter-day Saints, launched a petition, arguing the choir’s participation “does not reflect the values of Mormonism and does not represent its diverse 15-plus million members worldwide.”

By Thursday, it had nearly 19,000 signatures, most of whom reportedly are Mormons from across the U.S. and around the globe. Many expressed being “saddened and perplexed” by the decision to send the choir and urged LDS leaders to reconsider.

Meanwhile, choir members who have concerns about Trump or their participation could opt not to put their names into the lottery used to select those to perform.

Response to the choir’s appearance “has been mixed, with people expressing both opposition and support,” Hawkins said last week in a prepared statement.

The choir’s long tradition of performing for presidents “is not an implied support of party affiliations or politics,” he said. “It is a demonstration of our support for freedom, civility and the peaceful transition of power.”

We on the alt-right need to learn how to write petitions and then spread the word about our petitions. Petitions give legitimacy to the views of a tiny minority of liberals. I think they’re an effective propaganda tool. We should use them for our own propaganda purposes.

Mormons, once conservatives, are now fully on board with the (((globalist))) agenda. Witness Mitt Romney.

Mormons are not our friends, although on some issues they may be allies.