Guilty Verdict in Manslaughter Trial for Teen Girl Who Urged Boyfriend to Kill Himself

MICHELLE CARTER. GUILTY.

CONRAD ROY. THE DEAD BOYFRIEND.

It’s hard to imagine that anyone would defend Michelle Carter on moral grounds. She’s the teen who encouraged her boyfriend to kill himself, even telling him to get back in his truck, which he had rigged to fill up with exhaust gas.

The question that was not decided until the judge ruled yesterday was whether she was guilty of a crime. His Honor’s ruling was that she is guilty of manslaughter, punishable by up to 20 years in prison.

The case has been in the national spotlight for two and a half years because of the perceived evil nature of Michelle Carter’s actions and because there’s a First Amendment, free speech issue involved.

CBS News

TAUNTON, Mass. — A young Massachusetts woman accused of sending her boyfriend dozens of text messages urging him to kill himself when they were teenagers was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter Friday.

Michelle Carter was charged in the death of Conrad Roy III. Carter, then 17, cajoled Roy to kill himself in July 2014 with a series of texts and phone calls, prosecutors alleged. Roy died when his pickup truck filled with carbon monoxide in a store parking lot in Fairhaven. After he exited the truck, Carter told him to “get back in,” prosecutors said.

Continue reading

Gallup Survey Shows Americans Becoming More Accepting of Moral Degeneracy

You may recall a group in the 1980s fronted by the Reverend Jerry Falwell called the Moral Majority.

Today it would have to be renamed the Moral Minority.

Americans today accept acts that my grandmother and her religious leaders would have condemned. In fact, much of what is acceptable today would have not even crossed my grandmother’s mind. She read the Bible every day and attended church at least three times a week.

Let’s remember that until the Supreme Court’s Lawrence decision in 2003 that homosexual acts were illegal in Texas (and some other states as well).

Not everyone on the alt-right is a traditionalist, but many of us are. We’ve lost the battle to preserve almost everything traditional, but maybe not the war, as society slowly falls apart while living on fake Federal Reserve money. When the big financial crisis hits, there will be nothing like the mother of all economic collapses to bring back traditionalism.

Star-Tribune

Over the past decade and a half, tolerance for polygamy has more than doubled among the American public. A similar trend applies to human cloning.

Stunning as they are, these findings from the latest Gallup survey of moral opinion in the U.S. may tell more about the political future than the daily drama surrounding President Donald Trump.

To be sure, the percentage declaring polygamy and human cloning “morally acceptable,” in Gallup’s phrase, remains small: Seventeen percent are OK with the former; 14 percent, the latter. Neither is likely to become legal soon.

Yet the speed with which these formerly fringe ideas have moved toward the mainstream is significant and consistent with Gallup’s broader finding: Since 2001, there has been a clear and, apparently, irreversible, move toward more permissive or, to use Gallup’s word, “liberal” social norms.

“Libertarian” might be a better term. Gallup documents what can only be called a strong live-and-let-live consensus regarding several practices — birth control, divorce, sex between unmarried adults, gay or lesbian relations, out-of-wedlock childbearing — that within living memory were either fiercely contested or taboo. All garnered at least 62 percent acceptance in the poll, conducted just a month ago. Doctor-assisted suicide is trending up and now stands at 57 percent acceptance.

Taboos are weakening against pornography (acceptance up six points to 36 percent since 2011) and sex between teenagers (acceptance up four points to 36 percent since 2013). Meanwhile, new taboos are developing against wearing fur and medical testing on animals. Only adultery remains as unacceptable as in 2001; just 9 percent tolerate it.

In short, the culture wars may be ending in victory for progressives, with the caveat that a left-right frame is misleading regarding some issues — opposition to pornography, for example, has been a rare point of agreement between the religious right and left-wing feminists.

Americans are not only far more willing to countenance formerly taboo practices, they are also much less interested in government protection of “traditional values” than they were in the not-so-distant past.

It has been six years since another poll, by CNN/ORC, found for the first time that more Americans said the government should “not favor any set of values” rather than “promote traditional values.”

As of the most recent poll, in late 2014, 55 percent preferred a value-neutral government. No one would have predicted that just after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, when CNN/ORC found that 59 percent of Americans favored government promotion of traditional values, an all-time high.

Maybe that galvanizing moment gave way to the multiple disappointments and disillusions of the Iraq war and the financial crisis, which in turn bred broader doubts about government’s ability to do anything right, let alone foster moral values, and perhaps about the values themselves.

Another explanation, though, is that Gallup’s numbers confirm a long-standing postwar trend first identified by political scientist Ronald Inglehart of the University of Michigan, who has argued that Western societies’ turn from traditional values to individual autonomy and self-expression reflects their growing economic security, notwithstanding periodic wars and recessions.

The satisfaction of basic material needs, on a consistent basis, provides time and space for cultural, sexual and spiritual experimentation. Conversely, Inglehart has argued, members of society who feel least secure, materially and otherwise, continue to derive meaning from tradition and react against perceived threats to it emanating from the political sphere.

One interpretation of the overwhelming support of the country’s most religious, tradition-minded voters for a thrice-married, hedonistic tycoon is that it demonstrates their desperation to stop the progressive cultural wave.

Then again, data from Gallup and other sources show such wide moral acceptance of nontraditional norms that the new consensus must include plenty of Trump voters as well. The main exceptions to that consensus are abortion and gun control, about which a relatively even and highly partisan divide persists — and which candidate Trump exploited to win over red-state voters who might otherwise have distrusted him.

Jews in academia and media preaching tolerance for every vice and hatred for every virtue are not even mentioned in any of the analyses of moral degeneracy you’ll see in the MSM. I’m sure Professor Inglehard thinks he’s on to something with his economic theory of vice, and there’s probably some truth to it, but to ignore the Jewish role in perversion and degeneracy is disingenuous.

TODAY WITH MILEY CYRUS, THE NEW FACE OF MORALITY.

BACK IN THE DAY WITH CONNIE FRANCIS.

Atheists demand town remove church welcome signs

Evil Satanists are attacking a good Christian concept–that of welcoming strangers. They are demanding that the sign pictured above and another similar sign be taken down.

Declare those signs as historical monuments and let the atheist vandals try to destroy them via the court system.

Reminder: I’ve never seen a sign saying “The Synagogues of ______________ welcome you.” I’ve seen plenty of these nondenominational Christian church welcome signs in small towns, though.

Fox News

A group of perpetually-offended atheists, agnostics and freethinkers are threatening to sue a small Wisconsin town because of two welcome signs.

The signs, which were posted some 50 years ago, read, “The Churches of Oconomowoc Welcome You.”

The Freedom From Religion Foundation said the welcome signs are unconstitutional because they are not neutral toward all faiths.

“It endorses religion over non-religion and Christianity over all other faiths,” FFRF attorney Ryan Jayne wrote in a letter to town leaders.

The Freedom From Religion Foundation is on a national crusade to eradicate public displays of the Christian faith. They typically target communities that do not have the financial resources to fight back.

No one can explain how such signs or “In God We Trust” on coins harms anyone. Those who join in the crusade to strip religion from America are (((destroyers))) and should be the ones banned.

If the atheists are victorious in court, then move the signs to privately owned land where they will be safe from legal challenges.

Paleomasculinist Responds to Bitchy Feminist Mocking Masturbation

The Tweet above reminds me that sex robots have been in the news lately, along with all other manner of sexual behaviors. The cultural Marxist assault on morality roars along at warp speed now.

I’m not recommending that men form relationships with sex robots or sex dolls, but the constant taunting of men by feminists is going to backfire on them.

Certainly, Muslim males don’t put up with women’s sh*t, although as we’ve seen in a few stories posted here, white feminist SJWs believe it’s a good thing to be raped by Muzzies. It takes away their white guilt through some mysterious, insane process of redemption.

As the Tweet suggests, sex robots are an alternative to both masturbation and putting up with bitchy, unloving, unkind feminist whores. There’s still a problem for men, however.

Sex robots as marriage partners or lovers offer a cowardly way of life. There are significant MORAL ISSUES akin to the issues associated with having sex with animals or dead people. In short, I think we need to think twice about taking an amoral perspective on sexual relationships with robots.

The only real answer to the woes imposed on our culture by Jewish feminism is to destroy feminism. Taking away women’s rights to a degree and imposing on women a moral perspective on life is the only thing that can remake our culture into something decent.

That naked feminist and her stupid sign above is rightly mocked and ridiculed. Disempower her.

Quartz

In the face of AI exerts repeatedly predicting the rise of sex robots, it’s increasingly difficult to insist that such machines strictly belong to a far-off, dystopian future. But some robotics experts predict we’ll soon be doing far more than having sexual intercourse with machines. Instead, we’ll be making love to them—with all the accompanying romantic feelings.

At this week’s “Love and Sex with Robots” conference at Goldsmith University in London, David Levy, author of a book on human-robot love, predicted that human-robot marriages would be legal by 2050. Adrian Cheok, computing professor at City University London and director of the Mixed Reality Lab in Singapore, says the prediction is not so farfetched.

Uh-oh, my Jewdar just went off.

jewdar-gif

“That might seem outrageous because it’s only 35 years away. But 35 years ago people thought homosexual marriage was outrageous,” says Cheok, who also spoke at the conference. “Until the 1970s, some states didn’t allow white and black people to marry each other. Society does progress and change very rapidly.”

And though human-robot marriage might not be legal until 2050, Cheok believes humans will be living with robot partners long before then.

Though Cheok acknowledges that sex robots could fulfill sexist male sexual fantasies, he believes robot-human marriages will have an overwhelmingly positive effect on society. “People assume that everyone can get married, have sex, fall in love. But actually many don’t,” he says. And even those who do might be in search of a different option. “A lot of human marriages are very unhappy,” Cheok says. “Compared to a bad marriage, a robot will be better than a human.”

Notice that the author promoting sex with robots is a (((Jew))). Typical. Jews are leading whites down another dead end road that will lead to our extinction.

Although white men are demonized by feminists at the Huffington Post, on college campuses, on TV and the movies, we need to hang together and get our balls out of asses (sorry for the crude way of putting it) and confront these nasty women, as well as the Jews who seek our death as a race.

Just as importantly, we need to appreciate the good women in our lives.

LIVING NATURAL.

8 Year Old Girl Who Thinks She’s a Boy Banned from Cub Scouts

“JOE” MALDONADO. “HE” WAS BORN FEMALE.

Children can’t vote or drive an automobile. They can’t legally have sex. But they can decide that they’re the opposite sex from their birth certificate?

Something’s wrong.

Excerpt from North Jersey

From the moment he joined, 8-year-old Joe Maldonado eagerly looked forward to camping trips and science projects as a member of the Cub Scouts. But his expectations were dashed after his mother said she received a phone call from a Scouting official who told her that Joe would no longer be allowed to participate because he was born a girl.

Kristie Maldonado said she was stunned because her son had been a member of Cub Scout Pack 87 in Secaucus for about a month and his transgender status had not been a secret. But some parents complained, an official from the Northern New Jersey Council of Boy Scouts told her — even though her son had been living as a boy for more than a year and was accepted as a boy at school, she said

“Not one of the kids said, ‘You don’t belong here,’” Maldonado said of the Scouts in the pack.

“It made me mad,” Joe, said. “I had a sad face, but I wasn’t crying. I’m way more angry than sad. My identity is a boy. If I was them, I would let every person in the world go in. It’s right to do.”

Joe’s case could be the first time someone has been barred from participating in Scouting because of transgender identity, said members of the LGBT community. And it comes as the Boy Scouts of America appeared to be emerging from a period of turmoil involving sexual-orientation issues, reversing long-standing bans against gay Scouts and gay Scouting leaders over the past few years. Those policy changes were made amid an internal debate that saw at least one local council defy national Scouting decrees by hiring a gay camp counselor and pressure brought from corporations that withheld donations from the organization.

The Boy Scouts did not address the transgender issue at the time, LGBT advocates said, perhaps because the organization had no written policy related to gender identity. Transgender rights only recently emerged as a national issue, often focusing on the use of restrooms based on gender identity. Dozens of North Jersey school districts, including Secaucus, have granted that right, among others, to transgender students.

The Scouts declined to say whether they have a written transgender policy. Effie Delimarkos, the communications director for the Boy Scouts of America, said in a statement that the organization’s Cub Scouts programs are for boys age 7 to 10 and that “the classification on the participant’s birth certificate” would be used to “confirm legal status.” She did not provide additional details and did not specify whether the Boy Scouts have ever examined gender statuses on birth certificates.

The girl “tomboys” I knew as a youth grew out of it. Today, they’ll never have the chance because foolish adults indulge their sickness.

Maine Restaurant Owner, Anne Verrill, Won’t Serve People Who Like Guns

black pepe with gun

An arrogant leftist woman thinks she’s carved out a legit way to refuse service to white male patriots at her restaurant. She might end up excluding a few black gang bangers like Pepe above, too.

I actually have an NRA cap that I bought at a thrift shop. If near her places of business I would drop in and when refused service, I would sue her dumb a**.

Fox News

Anne Verrill, owner of two Portland-area restaurants, wrote on Facebook that anyone who owns—or even supports an individual’s right to own—an AR-15 semi-automatic rifle, may “no longer enter either of my restaurants, because the only thing I want to teach my children is love.”

ANNE VERRILL. LOVE.
anne Verrill

The post was deleted after a bunch of people on the internet who like guns found out about it and wrote mean things and threatened to boycott.

The New York Times published a rather breathless account of Verrill’s activism:

This time she took a stand, knowing it could hurt her business in a pro-gun, largely rural state, where hunting and target practice are immensely popular and where the political schisms run deep.

It’s one thing to say that people who carry AR-15s, which is legal to do in Maine without a permit, cannot be served in a restaurant. Over the past several years, big chains such as Starbucks, Chipotle, and Panera Bread have implored customers in “open-carry” states not to bring their firearms into their establishments.

Philosophically, I will support her right to refuse service to people who support the Second Amendment when she supports the right of another restaurant owner to refuse to serve blacks, faggots, trannies, Muslims, and whoever else THEY don’t like.

If a Christian baker can be compelled by the state to bake a gay wedding cake, then this woman should be compelled to cook up a meal for a gun owner.

Since the Facebook post is no longer up, in the interest of fairness, so that you can read Anne’s reasoning, here’s the entire post:

My facebook post last night was born from a simple question from my younger sister which was about whether my daughter was going to march with her worthy organization in the PRIDE parade in Portland this weekend. My response was, “No.” No, because I just don’t want to run the risk of having my daughter in a group of happy and proud people celebrating equality in a public space in a city that I love because I am scared. I let the fear win. I let the actions of dozens of lunatics over several years change the way I look at the world around me. My first thought about large gatherings was fear. It was then I realized that I am living in a world I don’t even recognize anymore.

When my children grow up and they ask me what I did to help change the course of gun violence will I say to them, I liked some face book memes and talked to like- minded people about our outrage and sadness. I signed some petitions relatively anonymously and held moments of silence? I felt sorry for the children in elementary school and children in movie theatres? Or will I say that I used the loudest voice I knew to shout my outrage and condemn the violence and beg for change in the most effective way I could see. Will I stand on the right side of history?

I don’t want to take away guns of responsible gun owners. I don’t care if you have 12 hunting rifles if you are a responsible hunter. I want people to not have the power to own weapons of war. I want our government to be able to deny someone they can put on the “no fly” lists to not buy a semi-automatic weapon. If you do not understand why I do not want a weapon designed to kill at that kind of rate of speed in my restaurants then there is nothing I can do about that. But I am not going to hide behind not politicizing myself for fear of my economic security. If evil and hate want to boycott my restaurants then so be it because I believe good will be on my side on this. As long as my doors are open I will believe that love is love. And when my children ask me where I was on this, I will say I was right there, fighting for a better world for us and for all those people who lost their lives.

Let it not go unsaid, the vitriol spewed to my original post validates my fear. However, I am still in control of my reaction. My reaction is the love that I have for my family, friends, employees and loyal guests whom I hope to constantly shower with respect and human decency regardless of what is said of me.

Anne Verrill

Ms. Verrill would be more wisely advised to ban Muslims, not guns. Or blacks, whose enormous propensity to gun violence should disturb her and everyone else.

heston gif

political correctness quote charleton heston

World Average IQ is Dropping Like a Rock

THE HUMAN PROFILE HERE SHOULD LOOK A LITTLE LESS CAUCASIAN.
world iq over time

Race matters. Facts are racist.

Science is twisting itself into a knot trying to explain why average IQ is falling in the West.

The answer is obvious to anyone with half his brain tied behind his back, if he’s willing to confront “racist” facts.

The complexion of the West is darkening. The nonwhite races are a larger percentage of the population. These groups, which include immigrants from Central America, the Middle East, Africa, and India, are less intelligent than white Westerners. IQ tests and personal observations prove that.

Bringing them to the West does not make them more intelligent.

Furthermore the reproductive selection strategies associated with nonwhites involves producing more offspring of lower quality. The average world IQ will decline to something quite close to retarded levels because lower IQ people will make up a larger and larger percent of the world population (and the population in the West.)

Many of these semi-retarded people carry a sense of racial grievance around with them. They cannot earn as much as an intelligent person and they blame that fact on racism. Sharing the wealth can only do so much to quash that sense of grievance.

The future of mankind does not look bright. Less intelligent, tribally-driven people who get their hands on a nuclear weapon could easily blow up the world. Humane population control measures offer a possible solution, but the weak and wimpy West has no stomach for telling the black African that if he wants Western food he must adopt Western birth control.

Daily Mail

Technology may be getting smarter, but humans are getting dumber, scientists have warned.

Evidence suggests that the IQs of people in the UK, Denmark and Australia have declined in the last decade.

Opinion is divided as to whether the trend is long-term, but some researchers believe that humans have already reached intellectual peak.

Continue reading