20 minutes. Try the first minute.
Teachers and police (and the IRS) expect blind obedience to authority.
The consequences can be severe when one disobeys. Are we living in a police state? Many awake Americans and Europeans believe so.
Excerpt from Lew Rockwell
Governments and corporations alike know that the best way to mold a person is to start in childhood.
That is why children younger than 6 are being prescribed anti-depressants by the government health care system in Great Britain. Almost 200,000 prescriptions for antidepressants are handed out to children under 18 in Great Britain, almost 13,000 of which go to kids from 7-12 and over 600 go to children under 6 years old!
Yet as disconcerting as these figures are, the UK isn’t the first country to have them. In 2009, five deaths have already been linked to antidepressants in Australian children aged 10 to 19; moreover, 89 recorded adverse reactions in children under nine were associated with antidepressants. Dr. Joe Tucci, Chief Executive of the Australian Childhood Foundation, said: “I cannot think of a good reason why any six-year-old, or younger, should be treated with antidepressants. I think it’s gone up because medication is being used to treat the symptoms and not the cause.”
The actual cause is where the story starts. Why are children so young depressed?
Coercion is arguably the leading cause of all mental health issues. In modern society, children start to feel this coercion as soon as they are born into a society shaped like a cattle pen.
Increasing suicide attempts by children are concentrated around the times when school is in session. The unnatural environment in which they are placed causes extreme stress for many children. The “well-adjusted” ones take to the authority like good sheep, and everyone else gets loaded up with drugs to make them a better citizen.
Later in life, a good citizen will take this lesson to heart. Don’t feel like you fit in? Not happy with your job, spouse, environment? Anxiety, depression, helplessness, anger over things that you cannot control because you feel forced into a life you don’t want?
Drugs. Do illegal drugs and enrich the CIA (and give the government an option to lock you up if they want), or do legal drugs and enrich the government connected pharmaceutical corporations.
It is, however, encouraging to see an increase in home-schooling in the USA, (which could actually be inadvertently fueled by forced vaccination for any children attending public school). About 40 years ago, 40 million children attended public school and under 100,000 were homeschooled. By 2005 48 million children attended public school, and a whopping 2 million were being homeschooled.
Parents who raise their kids to not blindly follow authority are doing a great service. It is tempting for parents to snap, “Because I said so!” to children, but it is better to explain why the rules are what they are whenever possible.
The kids rewarded in school are the ones best at following directions, and the teacher always hates the kid that asks why they have to do what they are told when it doesn’t make any sense. I once had to write a letter home because I didn’t wear my coat at recess. My parents responded by letting the teacher know that at the age of 12, my nerve endings had developed enough so that I could choose if a coat was necessary while running around in 50-degree temperatures for 15 minutes.
But police do the same thing to adults conditioned by the public school system.
If you get pulled over or are otherwise unfortunate enough to come into contact with the police, your life is literally in serious danger if you do not immediately and obediently follow all their orders, even when they have no legal standing to make those demands. Moving your hands out of site, asking why you are being arrested, or simply not hearing or understanding an officer are all offenses worthy of execution in the United States.
The teachers and police who expect blind obedience simply because they are an authority figure are programming the same thing into citizens: that the state must be obeyed, or there will be consequences.
And this same philosophy of shaping the citizen is seen everywhere to varying degrees and molded for different types of people. The newest trend is to police thought crimes by claiming that hate speech is not protected free speech. If you offend anyone, you have committed a crime, if you have a contrary opinion, it is fake news, if you desire any internet privacy, you are probably a terrorist.
The image below is art produced by David Dees, the man who resists authoritarianism. The is real alt-right art.
The Shadow Government
Copyright © 1994 Constitution Society. Permission is hereby granted to copy for noncommercial use.
It is becoming increasingly apparent to American citizens that government is no longer being conducted in accordance with the U.S. Constitution, or, within states, according to state constitutions. While people have recognized for more than 150 years that the rich and powerful often corrupt individual officials, or exert undue influence to get legislation passed that favors their interests, most Americans still cling to the naive belief that such corruption is exceptional, and that most of the institutions of society, the courts, the press, and law enforcement agencies, still largely comply with the Constitution and the law in important matters. They expect that these corrupting forces are disunited and in competition with one another, so that they tend to balance one another.
Mounting evidence makes it clear that the situation is far worse than most people think, that during the last several decades the U.S. Constitution has been effectively overthrown, and that it is now observed only as a façade to deceive and placate the masses. What has replaced it is what many call the Shadow Government. It still, for the most part, operates in secret, because its control is not secure. The exposure of this regime and its operations must now become a primary duty of citizens who still believe in the Rule of Law and in the freedoms which this country is supposed to represent.
Published on May 12 on youtube, the new Katy Perry video already has over 20 million views. With 600K up votes and 140K down votes, it’s clear that some people don’t like what they see.
Consider some perceptive comments:
Katy Perry – Bon Appétit (Official) ft. Migos
Amino2 hours ago
Cannibalism is the next nouveau cuisine for the elites and their puppets to enjoy openly. Spirit Cooking (albeit the faux/sanitised version the public get to see) is a direct example of their depravity and abject decadence. They will normalise it in the same way as paedophilia and all the other sick and debauched subversion of culture and behaviour. Promote the subject through ‘cool’ artsy/post modern expressionism via the media industries and in an educational manner whereby we’re convinced of its ubiquity around the world and how it’s been accepted in human history over the ages. By predicating it on a choice of freedom rather than the perverse and Satanic activity that it really is, they will succeed in de-humanising the crime until it’s regarded no differently than to eating pork chops. The truly evil part is the specific targeting of ignorant, impressionable and vulnerable children and young adults.
Also Perry’s Monarch programming appears compete IMO. What a total fucking demonic train wreck!
Risë P13 minutes ago
Thank you for this comment! You beat me to it! And very well-said. Nice to see informed and awake people out there. This country (and the world for that matter, towards globalization) are nothing but frogs in a boiling pot and have no idea what’s coming. Katy Perry is one of the most satanic, controlled slaves out there and people refuse to see it… or anything else going on for that matter. God help us.
DoubleTapped2 hours ago (edited)
So basically I just watched Katy Perry get mentally and physically tortured by chiefs, and then they make her a pole dancer in which then she turns to cannibalism to fulfill her need to get revenge and brutally drugs them,kills them and eats them. Good video
Peruna Hanhi2 hours ago
the key to making lot of money: make music video thas controversial as possible. Like strapping people to chairs, cutting and eating them. yea! sounds good! But if you dont like it, youre sexist, racist, homofobic, antisemitic, facist and worse than Hitler! Enjoy!
If Katy Perry were my daughter, I’d have to disown her. If she were my wife, I’d have to divorce her. If she were my girlfriend, I’d have to leave her. If she were my sister, I’d have to kill myself.
Like father, like daughter:
Excerpt from Grabien News
Controlling “exactly what people think” is the job of the media, MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski boldly declared Wednesday morning.
Heh, heh. She once accidentally called her “Morning Joe” program “Morning Jew.”
Be inspired to resist the Brezezinski family’ mind control plot.
The left has moved quickly to exploit the murder of British MP Jo Cox.
As is usual in cases where the intent is to exploit a crisis for gains for the left, at daybreak central time in the States, news relating to the crime is coming from Britain at a rapid clip.
Breakingnews.com offers this from it’s editor:
Southern Poverty Law Center says it has records indicating Tommy Mair, a locally named suspect in the killing of UK lawmaker Jo Cox, has ties to a white supremacist group – AP
No link was provided for that SPLC smear. But it shows the direction that the case against the alleged shooter is going to take. Every race realist in the world will be on trial with Tommy Mair.
Yahoo News reports that Cox had received threatening communications.
London (AFP) – Jo Cox, the British lawmaker murdered on the streets of northern England, had complained to police earlier this year about “malicious communications” she received, police said Friday.
A man was arrested in March and was cautioned by police, but he is not the man in custody for Thursday’s attack, a statement from London’s Metropolitan Police said.
Witnesses said Cox, a 41-year-old with two children aged three and five, was repeatedly shot and stabbed in Thursday’s assault in the Yorkshire village of Birstall.
Her murder came one week before Britain holds a referendum on whether to stay in or leave the European Union, a vote which has sparked a divisive and bitter campaign.
“Officers received an allegation of malicious communications from Jo Cox MP, and in March 2016 arrested a man in connection with the investigation,” the police statement said.
“The man subsequently accepted a police caution. The man who accepted the police caution is not the man in custody in West Yorkshire.”
Alleged racist, alleged shooter Tommy Mair has a half brother who basically calls the smear job on Tommy rubbish.
The script written by the New World Order for their murders often calls for a dangerous white male racist to be charged with and convicted of the crime. It’s kind of like the old cliche applied to fiction murder mysteries: The
butler angry white male did it.
Tommy’s half brother isn’t reading from the script though. His comments challenge that script.
The half-brother of the man accused of killing Labour MP Jo Cox has said he ‘wouldn’t hurt a fly’.
Tommy Mair, 52, was arrested after Mrs Cox was shot and stabbed outside a library in Birstall, Leeds, earlier today.
Duane St Louis told ITV News he was ‘shocked’ by the MP’s death but insisted his half-brother ‘wouldn’t hurt a fly’.
He described Mair as having ‘never been in trouble in his life, he’s not like that’ and said the last time he saw him was allegedly three weeks ago.
He also added: ‘He has never expressed any political views, never said anything about Britain First.
‘His only mental problem is OCD, he keeps cleaning himself all the time, he has had it for years.’
St Louis told the site that he had spoken to Mair’s mother, who is ‘shocked and can’t understand what has happened.’
He also made it clear that he was unaware of the suspect having anything to do with guns or knives.
When asked if his brother was racist, St Louis responded: ‘No chance.’
Mair’s other brother, Scott, insisted he held no extremist views.
He said: ‘We don’t even know who he votes for. I am so sorry for the MP and her family. I’ve no idea how he got the gun.’
In death, Jo Cox is more famous than in life. RIP, dear lady. And may the truth about your assassination be exposed, whatever it is.
Condensed by Paladin Justice from American Renaissance
We arrived in a training room with two rows of chairs facing each other. The instructor was a black man, accompanied by a drab-looking white woman who sat at a desk at the front of the room.
The setup reminded me of military boot camp, in which a drill instructor parades back and forth before the recruits to indoctrinate them in the ways of the military. That turned out to be a good analogy.
The indoctrination started with seemingly innocuous questions to each participant about how we felt about relations with people of other groups. Everyone gave positive, even idealistic replies. The instructor attacked and picked apart virtually every answer. Some participants protested they were sincere in their replies but the instructor made them stand in front of the class and then asked them whether they would turn to someone of their own race if they needed help. The resistors conceded their prejudices and sat down.
The class then proceeded with the instructor becoming increasingly surly and confrontational, often raising his voice to make his points. He went through a litany of the effects of historic racial prejudices in American society, and likely still to be harbored by the participants.
The class was almost entirely about white “racism,” so the instructor picked on whites and it was mostly whites who replied.
At the end of the first day of this treatment I was angry. The class was not a dialogue, but a diatribe.
Day two opened with the instructor now smiling and engaging. What a shock! He then vouchsafed one of many “revelations:” that his nasty treatment on the first day was to show us how it felt to “be a black person in American society.” Needless to say, I have never seen such loathsome treatment of blacks by whites. Instead, what we experienced was how blacks can treat other blacks, and other groups as well.
Our instructor had a grand theory. “What do you believe is the root cause white racism towards blacks?” he asked the class. There was no reply. “Because whites do not want their daughters marrying black men,” he shouted. He then excoriated whites for causing so much agony for blacks over the years just because they didn’t want their women engaging in miscegenation.
The culmination of the class was a “hands on” psycho-babble analysis of each of us. He held my hands, closed his eyes for a few seconds, and then said “you are hurting people.” I took this as a compliment coming from that bastard.
So what should you do if you are faced with a mandatory race relations (grievances) program at work or at your univerrsity? Should you argue back, or just take the nonsense?
First of all, don’t do anything that could get you fired. You should not say anything against the overall goals of the program. Never say that “diversity” is a misplaced priority, or cast aspersions on any specific group. Something that could make a difference is whether instructors are company employees or outside contractors. If they are outsiders you probably have greater latitude.
You can cast enough doubt in the minds of the participants to undermine the course just by pointing out the flaws in the logic, facts, consistency, and fairness of this kind of instruction. Be cool, logical and persistent, and your instructor may become (more) irrational and lose composure. That will mean a loss of credibility. Refuse to be drawn into invasive, personal questions.
Report any abusive treatment to your human resources department, and if you can get a group to back you your appeal will be much more powerful.
One of the most important things you can do is identify any participants in the class who may be sympathetic to your views and draw them out. You may have to break the ice, but after that, others will follow. People are conformists. Most are afraid to be the only one to go against the herd, but once you speak up, it will be much, much easier for others to do the same.
A minority of one may seem like a kook, but a minority of two is a faction. It will change the entire dynamic of dissent if you have even one ally.
Too many whites hang their heads and let some white-hating swine insult them. When you fight back, you are fighting back for all white people. It’s about time.