Australian Military Bans MEN: “PC gone mad”

Aussie men will just have to become trannies if they want to serve in an all-female military.

The government apparently doesn’t want men with military training to be able to physically resist the government’s tyrannical ways.

Women are less rebellious

Yahoo Australia

The federal government is rejecting claims that the Australian Army is looking to close its gender gap by banning male recruits from taking up new roles.

Defence Industry Minister Christopher Pyne said there’s “no banning of men being recruited in the army”.

“We don’t have enough women in the armed forces and we are trying to encourage more to be a part of that society, but there is no banning of men being recruited,” he said.

News Corp reported earlier that Australian Defence Force staff have been told to recruit only women, including in frontline combat roles, under threat of being reassigned if they ignore the directive in an attempt to increase the number of female soldiers in its ranks.

The move had reportedly been described as ‘political correctness gone mad’ by defence insiders.

This week’s list of Army jobs on offer includes 50 roles, 35 of which are only available to women, the report said.

The navy and air force are said to be facing similar quotas.

Bernie Gaynor, a former Army officer and Australian Conservatives party member, says the ADF’s “politically correct policies have gone beyond bonkers”.

“It is now openly discriminating against males for its combat roles in the Army,” he told News Corp.

Men Reveal How They Were Forced to Have Sex with Women

DR. SIOBHAN WEARE IS BRINGING A TABOO SUBJECT TO PUBLIC ATTENTION.

Since I was forced to have sex with two different students at the university, 15 years apart, the subject of female on male “rape” (not recognized by law as rape) interests me. Like the males in this study, I did not report the crimes to police nor did I disclose them to family or friends.

metro.co.uk

A survey of men who say they have been forced to have sex by a woman claims blackmail and threats were the most common methods used.

A research project of 154 men ‘compelled to penetrate’ a woman found more than a fifth of them were forced into it by threats and blackmail.

Telling lies, threats to end a relationship, warnings of rumour-spreading and verbal abuse were cited by 22% of men in the survey.

The research project, led by Dr Siobhan Weare, from Lancaster University Law School, and supported by charity Survivors Manchester, also found the use of force, such as pinning down with bodyweight or having a weapon, was reported by 14% of men who completed the survey.

The project aimed to explore one of the ‘last taboos’ – sexual violence by women against men.

Dr Weare said: ‘Whilst the sample size of 154 may be smaller than typically expected, this must be considered in the context of an issue that is under-reported and under-discussed, and that this is the first and only survey of its kind to be conducted in the UK.

‘The ‘hidden’ nature of this crime and the ‘complex’ gender dynamics involved means that huge numbers of survey participants were highly unlikely – not because this isn’t happening to men, but because many are made to feel too ashamed or feel too distressed to report it.’

Dr Weare said it was difficult to know the prevalence of forced-to-penetrate cases in the UK, but research in the US in 2010 found that approximately one in 21 men reported being ‘made to penetrate’ someone else during their lifetime, with 79% of cases involving a female perpetrator.

She added: ‘The term “forced to penetrate” has been coined for these cases because, while they involve non-consensual penile penetration, they do not fall under the offence of rape.

‘The offence of rape can only be committed by men due to the requirement of penile penetration of the victim. In “forced to penetrate” cases, the offender is the one being penetrated by a non-consenting victim.’

All 154 of the UK male survey participants had experienced compelled penetration.

The men shared their most recent experience of being forced to penetrate a woman, as well as their engagement with the criminal justice system, how they would label what had happened to them, whether they had experienced multiple victimisation, and emotional and psychological harms.

The majority of the participants who completed the survey reported that they knew the woman, often as an acquaintance or a friend, and just over half were in, or had been in, a relationship with the perpetrator.

Only two men said that they had reported their experience to the police and in both instances the case did not make it to court.

‘Rape’ was the most frequent label used by the participants in describing their ordeal, despite the law not recognising such cases in this way.

‘Sex’ was used least frequently.

The vast majority, 80% of them, did not disclose their experience to family or friends and 74% had not sought support, suggesting that men are left feeling isolated and alone in dealing with their experiences.

One of the women who assaulted me was a fat feminist who hid her hatred of men very well. The other was a woman who wanted to be my girlfriend. She too was not anyone that most men would enjoy having sex with.

Although some men’s fantasies about women raping them may be good, the actual situation isn’t.

Degenerate America Finds a New Way to Turn Men into Sissies

When a man wears what appears to be women’s panties, is he still going to act like a man?

The effort to exterminate masculinity marches on. Portraying white men as weak goofuses in TV and the movies isn’t enough. Now they want to change our underwear.

I also observe that women are wearing underwear these days that looks just like men’s underwear.

One race, one gender, one world government with one currency and one religion (Islam). That’s the New World Order for you.

Topless Protests in Argentina Draw Male Stares and Giggles

From slutwalks to the Women’s March on Washington, women with time on their hands are protesting something.

It’s a shitshow, tolerated by white males who have no time to stage a protest because they’re too busy working their asses off to keep the shitshow running.

Times Live

Scores of women took to the streets in Argentina Tuesday in a bare-breasted demonstration of solidarity with women recently confronted by police for going topless on a South Atlantic beach.

The demonstrations in Buenos Aires, in Mar del Plata and Rosario, were prompted by an incident two weeks ago in Necochea, 500 kilometers south of the capital.

Three women in bikini bottoms were ordered by 20 police officers to put on their tops or head out.

Many in Argentina, once one of the world’s wealthiest countries, were stunned.

Now used to struggling with economic woes and corruption, they are increasingly tired of what some see as the authorities’ overreach.

“There is this macho way of thinking that just has to end,” said a protestor named Noelia, 28, who declined to give her family name. “We are the owners of our bodies and we can show our bodies if we like. We are not consumer goods.”

As older men in suits and ties scrambled out of nearby offices during the protest, some stopped to stare. A few laughed or giggled.

“You can’t miss a chance to see a bit of tit, can you?” said one man, aged around 60, to nods from others.

“Get out, man! Get out!” some demonstrators chanted, with slogans painted on their skin in lipstick.

Some of the men took selfies with the demonstrators, perhaps not necessarily in solidarity.

The leftist politician Vilma Ripoll said, “All people want to see tits on television. The real ones bother you.”

Last July, thousands of women took part in topless protests across the country after a woman was kicked out of a public area near the capital for nursing her child, triggering widespread outrage

The white male and only the white male has the power to stop the shitshow dead in its tracks. A general strike by white males would lead not just to inconvenience but to severe consequences to women and nonwhites.

Imagine a world with no white male auto mechanics on duty, no repairmen to respond to breakdowns, no airplane pilots, no truck drivers, and so forth.

Mexican men and a few black males could take up a small part of the slack, but basically everything would stop for the duration of the strike, getting worse as time went on.

Alternatively, if women are oppressed by having to keep their clothes on, then can’t the same thing be said for men?

Let’s make our rallying cry FREE THE DICK!

Let’s start taking it out and giving it some fresh air at school, in restaurans, on street corners, in airports.

FREE THE DICK! Take it out and WAVE IT AT THE PEOPLE.

I’m joking. I hope.

“Submit and Obey:” The TYRANNY of WOMEN Over MEN

The analysis of America today by Eric Peters laid out below has three dimensions:

1. We are slaves to an all-powerful evil government.

2. The bureaucrats who control us are petty, tyrannical women.

3. Sports are a tool of the Deep State used to deflect our attention from our slavery and to dissipate our manly rage, which would otherwise explode in violent rebellion.

Given the obsession with yesterday’s Super Bowl, the timing of Peter’s essay is impeccable.

Excerpt from Eric Peters Autos

These games – a new one to keep people busy almost every day, year-round – are not so much “bread and circuses,” as they are often called. They are the vivification of the fictional Two Minutes’ Hate in Orwell’s 1984. A means by which the passions – the frustrations and anger of men in particular – are diverted and dissipated.

In order that they aren’t directed at anything important.

Such as the ever-increasing control exercised over men by the state.

In red giant stage America, the average man has little meaningful control over his life. He does as he’s told – from driving the speed limit to paying “his” taxes. In the land of individuality, collectivism and conformity is the rule.

He must Submit and Obey. He must never raise his voice to question authority.

This stifling of independent action, punishment of deviation from any official orthodoxy and relentless suppression of independent judgment and self-reliance… this systematic thwarting of a normal man’s inclination to be a man. . . well, the pressure builds.

The movie, Falling Down, captured this brilliantly. Unfortunately for Michael Douglas’ character, he wasn’t interested in “the game.”

The demand that men submit and obey is also hammered into today’s boys – usually by women.

Orwell got one thing wrong. It is not Big Brother.

It is Big Sister.

Everywhere, there are short-haired, pants-suited termagants vested with power; the sort who in a better time would have been spinster librarians and generally harmless. Today they infect bureaucracies such as EPA and DOJ and many others besides.

We encounter them at the doctor’s office and DMV.

The beetle-like little men that Orwell described abound, too. But they tyranny of our times is not a masculine tyranny such as Stalin’s. Note that in the Soviet Union, people were still largely free to partake of petty vices such as booze and cigarettes. Soviet power didn’t limit the size of sodas or force people to wear seat belts. It enforced political conformity only.

Maybe that’s why fuhhhhhhttttttball was never a big deal in the Soviet Union.

America’s tyranny is the tyranny of the elementary school marm over grown up men.

These days, a man can’t even paint his own house without first begging permission from the local Gertrud Schlotz-Klink. . . and if he doesn’t cut his grass when ordered or erects a shed unapproved…

As the essay draws to a conclusion, Peters notes that sports dissipates the male anger and outrage at being lorded over by petty female tyrants.

I’d rather stay in touch with my rage, live in reality, and ignore sports. How to deal with petty tyrants is still a difficult question, one that has no easy answers.

My own inclination is to sabotage the System (legally) every time I can.

Texas Judge Wears Pussy Hat in Courtroom

It seems never to occur to anyone, or maybe they’re afraid to say it, that women are not temperamentally fit to be judges. That’s a generalization that would have exceptions of course. But on the whole, women do not make good judges.

Is everyone too afraid to say that? I’m not. From Ruth Bader Ginzberg to Sonia Sotomayor, etc., women judges have no ability to understand the law and render good decisions.

Judge Janine is an exception. I can’t think of another one. Certainly not Judge Judy.

Read more at Twitchy

Paleomasculinist Responds to Bitchy Feminist Mocking Masturbation

The Tweet above reminds me that sex robots have been in the news lately, along with all other manner of sexual behaviors. The cultural Marxist assault on morality roars along at warp speed now.

I’m not recommending that men form relationships with sex robots or sex dolls, but the constant taunting of men by feminists is going to backfire on them.

Certainly, Muslim males don’t put up with women’s sh*t, although as we’ve seen in a few stories posted here, white feminist SJWs believe it’s a good thing to be raped by Muzzies. It takes away their white guilt through some mysterious, insane process of redemption.

As the Tweet suggests, sex robots are an alternative to both masturbation and putting up with bitchy, unloving, unkind feminist whores. There’s still a problem for men, however.

Sex robots as marriage partners or lovers offer a cowardly way of life. There are significant MORAL ISSUES akin to the issues associated with having sex with animals or dead people. In short, I think we need to think twice about taking an amoral perspective on sexual relationships with robots.

The only real answer to the woes imposed on our culture by Jewish feminism is to destroy feminism. Taking away women’s rights to a degree and imposing on women a moral perspective on life is the only thing that can remake our culture into something decent.

That naked feminist and her stupid sign above is rightly mocked and ridiculed. Disempower her.

Quartz

In the face of AI exerts repeatedly predicting the rise of sex robots, it’s increasingly difficult to insist that such machines strictly belong to a far-off, dystopian future. But some robotics experts predict we’ll soon be doing far more than having sexual intercourse with machines. Instead, we’ll be making love to them—with all the accompanying romantic feelings.

At this week’s “Love and Sex with Robots” conference at Goldsmith University in London, David Levy, author of a book on human-robot love, predicted that human-robot marriages would be legal by 2050. Adrian Cheok, computing professor at City University London and director of the Mixed Reality Lab in Singapore, says the prediction is not so farfetched.

Uh-oh, my Jewdar just went off.

jewdar-gif

“That might seem outrageous because it’s only 35 years away. But 35 years ago people thought homosexual marriage was outrageous,” says Cheok, who also spoke at the conference. “Until the 1970s, some states didn’t allow white and black people to marry each other. Society does progress and change very rapidly.”

And though human-robot marriage might not be legal until 2050, Cheok believes humans will be living with robot partners long before then.

Though Cheok acknowledges that sex robots could fulfill sexist male sexual fantasies, he believes robot-human marriages will have an overwhelmingly positive effect on society. “People assume that everyone can get married, have sex, fall in love. But actually many don’t,” he says. And even those who do might be in search of a different option. “A lot of human marriages are very unhappy,” Cheok says. “Compared to a bad marriage, a robot will be better than a human.”

Notice that the author promoting sex with robots is a (((Jew))). Typical. Jews are leading whites down another dead end road that will lead to our extinction.

Although white men are demonized by feminists at the Huffington Post, on college campuses, on TV and the movies, we need to hang together and get our balls out of asses (sorry for the crude way of putting it) and confront these nasty women, as well as the Jews who seek our death as a race.

Just as importantly, we need to appreciate the good women in our lives.

LIVING NATURAL.