Questions Arise About MILO’s Honesty as Berkeley Free Speech Week Goes Up in Flames

MILO, the celebrity homosexual conservative, claimed that he was going to challenge leftist orthodoxy by bringing a slate of conservative speakers to the UC Berkeley campus next week, including Steve Bannon and Ann Coulter.

It’s not happening. Did MILO lie? Some people believe the notorious butt banger fibbed in order to push himself back into prominence after his fall from grace earlier this year.

It looks like his name is muddied again.

Good. We don’t need him. He knows how to effectively dispute feminist garbage and a few other things, but we don’t need him.

Excerpt from The Atlantic

At first, conservative agitator Milo Yiannopoulos’s Free Speech Week in Berkeley, California, seemed like it might be a major event. Four straight days of provocative events on campus featuring right-wing luminaries, culminating with appearances by conservative writer Ann Coulter and former Trump White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, and all in the heart of one of the most symbolically resonant places Yiannopoulos could have chosen: the campus of University of California, Berkeley, a campus with a longstanding image as a hotbed of left-wing activism where protests shut down an event of his last year.

But things didn’t go according to plan.

Speakers whose names appeared on initial schedules have either pulled out or said they were never planning to go; the campus publication Yiannopoulos is working with, The Berkeley Patriot, never reserved indoor school venues and appeared to pull out Friday afternoon; and Yiannopoulos announced on his Instagram a planned march through campus on Sunday in protest of Berkeley’s supposed clamp-down on free speech. “It’s time to reclaim free speech at UC Berkeley and send shockwaves through the American education system to every other college under liberal tyranny,” Yiannopoulos wrote in his post. The event would have been an important step in reviving Yiannopoulos’s wounded image on the right after a clip of him appearing to defend pedophilia caused him to be barred from CPAC and lose his job as a Breitbart editor in February. Earlier this week, Yiannopoulos told me in a text message that “We will fight until the last man is ejected from the last step on Sproul Plaza.”

There seem to be a lot of Jewish conservatives involved in Free Speech Week, including MILO.

Hmmm.

Continue reading

Nice! Paul Joseph Watson Gets #HerpesHillary Trending on Twitter (Video)

PJW offers proof that Hillary Clinton is a psychopath. Nice work.

Obviously, this sort of material is a distraction from the real problems confronting us, but spending a few minutes watching Hillary act totally insane and seeing her mocked by the talented PJW is an enjoyable break.

Nine minutes. You’ll see some crazy from Hillary that you’ve never seen before.

After 50 Years of Lies and Cover Ups, It’s Time to Investigate Israel’s Dastardly Attack on the USS Liberty

The American Legion has called for a Congressional Inquiry into the attack on the USS Liberty 50 years ago. This excerpt explains why an investigation is needed.

Excerpt from Unz.com via Lew Rockwell

On June 8th 1967 the United States Navy intelligence ship the U.S.S. Liberty was attacked in international waters by aircraft and vessels belonging to Israel. Thirty-four sailors, Marines and civilians were killed in the attack. The deliberate Israeli air and sea onslaught sought to sink the clearly identified intelligence gathering ship and kill all its crew. It was in truth the worst attack ever carried out on a U.S. Naval vessel in peace time. In addition to the death toll, 171 more of the crew were wounded in the two-hour assault, which was clearly intended to destroy the intelligence gathering vessel operating in international waters collecting information on the ongoing fighting between Israel and its Arab neighbors. The Israelis, whose planes had their Star of David markings covered up so Egypt could be blamed, attacked the ship repeatedly from the air and with torpedo boats from the sea. When one Israeli pilot hesitated, refusing to attack what was clearly an American ship, he was instructed to proceed anyway.

Most Americans are completely unaware that a United States naval vessel was once deliberately targeted and nearly sunk by America’s “greatest friend and ally” Israel. The attack was followed by a comprehensive cover-up that demonstrated clearly that at least one president of the United States even back nearly fifty years ago valued his relationship with the state of Israel above his loyalty to his own country.

The most disgusting part of the tale relates to how U.S. warplanes sent to the Liberty’s aid from an aircraft carrier in the Mediterranean were called back by Defense Secretary Robert McNamara acting under orders from President Lyndon Baines Johnson, who declared that he would rather see the ship go to the bottom of the sea than embarrass his good friend Israel. Ironically, the first ship to reach the foundering Liberty and offer assistance was from the Soviet Union, an offer that was declined.

The incredible courage and determination of the surviving crew was the only thing that kept the Liberty from sinking. The ship’s commanding officer Captain William McGonagle was awarded a Congressional Medal of Honor for his heroic role in keeping the ship afloat, though President Lyndon Baines Johnson broke with tradition and refused to hold the medal ceremony in the White House, also declining to award it personally, delegating that task to the Secretary of the Navy in a closed to the public presentation made at the Washington Navy Yard. The additional medals given to other crew members in the aftermath of the attack made the U.S.S. Liberty the most decorated ship based on a single engagement with hostile forces in the history of the United States Navy.

The cover-up of the attack began immediately. The Liberty crew was sworn to secrecy over the incident, as were the Naval dockyard workers in Malta, and even the men of the U.S.S. Davis, which had assisted the badly damaged Liberty to port were ordered to be silent. A hastily convened and conducted court of inquiry ordered by Admiral John McCain interviewed only a few crewmen and did not seek to determine what had actually happened, instead, acting under orders from Washington, it moved quickly to declare the attack a case of mistaken identity. The inquiry’s senior legal counsel Captain Ward Boston, who subsequently declared the attack to be a “deliberate effort to sink an American ship and murder its entire crew,” also revealed that Admiral Isaac Kidd, who presided over the inquiry, had told him that “President Lyndon Johnson and Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara ordered him [Kidd] to conclude that the attack was a case of ‘mistaken identity’ despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.” The court’s findings were rewritten and sections relating to Israeli war crimes, to include the machine gunning of life rafts, were excised.

Following in his father’s footsteps, Senator John McCain of Arizona has used his position on the Senate Armed Services Committee to effectively block any reconvening of a board of inquiry to re-examine the evidence. The documents relating to the Liberty incident from the White House perspective of McNamara and Johnson, if they have not been destroyed, have never been released to the public in spite of the 50 years that have passed since the attack took place.

In retrospect, one might well have expected little better from the likes of Lyndon Johnson, Robert McNamara and either Admiral John McCain or his son, but the cover-up that has endured for fifty years involving the national media as well as politicians from both parties is perhaps even more disgraceful because it has established the principle that even when Israel targets and kills American military personnel it will never ever be held accountable. Such is the power of the Israel Lobby in the United States.

This excerpt is less than half the article. The rest of it goes on to describe the American Legion’s participation in the cover up.

Comey Investigation of Hillary Clinton Total Fraud: Lock Them Both Up

Corrupt CNN is protecting former FBI Director James Comey today by omitting the timeline for when Comey exonerated Hillary Clinton in private before going public. Apparently, it was MANY MONTHS before interviewing witnesses that Comey sat down and drafted an exoneration of Hillary Clinton.

CNN

Former FBI Director James Comey drafted a statement exonerating former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for running her government emails through a private email server before completing the investigation, according to two Republican senators.

Comey prepared the draft exoneration for Clinton before conducting interviews with top Clinton aides who were offered immunity for their cooperation, Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley and Sen. Lindsey Graham said Thursday in a joint statement, citing transcripts of interviews with former Comey aides obtained by the Senate judiciary committee.

Comey would go on to announce in July 2016 that the FBI would not recommend charges against Clinton — although he sharply chastised her decision to conduct State Department business through a private email server.

“Conclusion first, fact-gathering second — that’s no way to run an investigation. The FBI should be held to a higher standard than that, especially in a matter of such great public interest and controversy,” Grassley and Graham wrote in a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray seeking more information — including all drafts of Comey’s final statement on Clinton’s emails by September 13.

None of the committee’s Democrats signed onto the request.

President Donald Trump commented on the senators’ statement Friday morning: “Wow, looks like James Comey exonerated Hillary Clinton long before the investigation was over…and so much more. A rigged system!” he tweeted.

Earlier this year, Comey testified before Congress that his decision to make the public announcement in July — something that rarely happens when investigators decide not to pursue charges — came because of political pressure he said he felt from Attorney General Loretta Lynch to downplay the investigation.

The transcripts released to the Senate judiciary committee come from interviews of FBI aides to Comey, conducted as part of a personnel investigation of him by the Office of Special Counsel (which is unrelated to Special Counsel Robert Mueller.)

In one exchange from the redacted transcripts, an unidentified FBI aide says that Comey first wrote a draft of the July statement in May 2016.

“There were many iterations, at some point, there were many iterations of the draft that circulated,” the unidentified aide said.
The FBI has not responded to CNN’s request for information.

A person familiar with the matter pushed back on the notion that Comey had already reached a conclusion that affected the investigation.

The person said back in spring 2016, agents and Justice Department officials were talking about how the investigation would end and there was a belief that the evidence was going in a direction to not support bringing charges. This individual said by April 2016 the FBI had reviewed most of the evidence and didn’t find evidence suggesting that Clinton had violated federal law. The person said the FBI wanted to interview her but didn’t believe it was going to change the outcome.

The source also said Comey was not involved in the day-to-day steps of the investigation, so even if he reached a conclusion it wouldn’t have affected the result of the investigation.

A second person familiar with the matter told CNN that Comey had not already made up his mind, and that it did not influence the investigation. The second source says the FBI had already reviewed much of the evidence by spring and it was becoming more clear that it was not likely to support bringing charges.

Comey’s handling of the Clinton email case has been a rare instance of Washington of successfully ticking off Republicans and Democrats almost across the board, although for very different reasons. Republicans accused Comey of going soft on Clinton, while Democrats blasted him for later resurrecting the issue with just days left in the 2016 election.

Comey, in testimony before the Senate judiciary committee this past May, said he felt “nauseous” at the thought of having swayed the election.

Roughly a week later, Trump fired Comey.

Never forget that when Trump fired Comey that Democrats and the media beat the drums for Trump’s impeachment.

The swamp is being drained. Let’s petition Congress to lock up Comey for fraud and dereliction of duty. He made himself an accessory after the fact to Hillary Clinton’s criminal activities. Comey was sold to the American people as a straight arrow. We were lied to.

White Man Admits that Black Knifeman Story was HOAX

US NAVY SEAMAN JOSHUA WITT. HOAXER.

Hoaxes that involve so-called right wing politics that lay the blame for some illegal act on a nonwhite person are rare. It’s usually nonwhites doing a crime that can be blamed on whites.

In all honesty, the hoaxer, Jason Witt, looks Jewish and homosexual to me. If he is a homo that would explain a lot since those tortured souls are always cooking up some kind of drama.

On the other hand, it would be like a Jew to lie to try to get the white man blamed for lying about black violence.

CBS Local Denver

SHERIDAN, Colo. (CBS4)– A man who told police that he was asked by a stranger whether he was a neo-Nazi before that stranger stabbed him has been arrested for making up the story.

Joshua Witt posted pictures of his stabbing wounds on his Facebook page right after the alleged attack. That post gained a lot of attention in the aftermath of this month’s violent protests in Charlottesville.

Witt, 26, says when he went to get out of his vehicle at the Steak & Shake in Sheridan, a man walked up to him and asked whether he was a neo-Nazi before stabbing him.

Witt also posted that he is serving in the U.S. Navy.

Witt told police his attacker was a black man and that he ran towards the bike path the runs along the South Platte River.

Police investigated Witt’s claim but became suspicious because his story didn’t match up with the evidence.

Officers located a man who matched the description Witt provided. He is a transient who lives in the area and was cleared as a possible suspect.

Investigators said that video surveillance did not show anyone running from the scene as Witt described.

Video surveillance from inside a sporting goods store showed Witt buying a small knife minutes before the alleged attack.

When police re-interviewed Witt, he admitted to accidentally cutting himself with the knife while parked in his car in front of the sporting goods store. He also admitted making up the story about being attacked.

The police work for this case was pretty easy. Has Witt never heard of security cameras. Wow! What a dimwit.

Paul Craig Roberts: How We Know The So-Called “Civil War” Was Not Over Slavery

Were you taught about the Corwin Amendment to the Constitution?

Neither was I.

Wikipedia has an article on it.

In this post Paul Craig Roberts explains how the War Between the States was not about slavery, no matter how much liberals say otherwise.

Dr. Roberts relates the slavery issue to the liberal attack on our history–an attack that has seen American heroes slandered and their statues removed and/or vandalized.

Statues and monuments are important. They represent the South, for sure, but they also represent honesty, freedom, courage, bravery, and sacrifice. Their removal is an effort to obliterate us as a people. It is NOT morality that drives the pandering politician to destroy history. It is Not morality, but rather hate. Hatred of our freedom, our independence, our right to exist and be ourselves. That some white people go along with this soft white genocide proves nothing other than how stupid some white people are.

Paul Craig Roberts

When I read Professor Thomas DiLorenzo’s article ( http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/08/21/lincoln-myth-ideological-cornerstone-america-empire/ ) the question that lept to mind was, “How come the South is said to have fought for slavery when the North wasn’t fighting against slavery?”

Two days before Lincoln’s inauguration as the 16th President, Congress, consisting only of the Northern states, passed overwhelmingly on March 2, 1861, the Corwin Amendment that gave constitutional protection to slavery. Lincoln endorsed the amendment in his inaugural address, saying “I have no objection to its being made express and irrevocable.”

Quite clearly, the North was not prepared to go to war in order to end slavery when on the very eve of war the US Congress and incoming president were in the process of making it unconstitutional to abolish slavery.

Here we have absolute total proof that the North wanted the South kept in the Union far more than the North wanted to abolish slavery.

If the South’s real concern was maintaining slavery, the South would not have turned down the constitutional protection of slavery offered them on a silver platter by Congress and the President. Clearly, for the South also the issue was not slavery.

Continue reading

Claim: Ex-Hooters Girl Lost in Woods for 25 Days was High on Meth Whole Time

ALABAMA’S LISA THERIS.

Lisa Theris’ male companions (her dealers? boyfriends?) were so f*cked up on drugs that they each blamed the other for her murder!

Meth is everywhere, including rural Alabama, courtesy of the Mexican drug gangs that Trump is cracking down on.

metro.co.uk

A woman who allegedly survived naked and alone in Alabama woods for a month could have got lost because she was high on meth.
Investigators were left scratching their heads when 25-year-old Lisa Theris emerged after the two men she had been with had blamed each other for her apparent murder.

Miss Theris staggered out of the woodland covered in bites and mud on the a highway in Midway, Alabama last Saturday afternoon and was spotted by a passing motorist.

She had lost 45 lbs but was unharmed and claimed she survived by eating berries and wild mushrooms and drinking water from muddy puddles and creeks.

She was last seen with petty criminals Randall Wade Oswald, 36, and Manley Green Davis, 31, and is believed to have got high on meth. The pair were so freaked out at her disappearance they blamed each other for killing her.

Bullock County Sheriff Raymond Rodgers told DailyMail.com. ‘They were so geeked out that they started blaming each other for a murder that didn’t happen.

‘They were as relieved as we were when she walked out of those woods. They were thinking they killed her.’

The two petty thieves admitted to being involved in a robbery on the day Miss Theris, who has bipolar disorder and is registered legally blind, went missing. They both admit she was with them but she denies the accusation saying she jumped out of a truck on the way to the crime.

Her account is now being questioned by Alabama residents who do not believe she could have been lost for so long in a small space.

One person who does not believe her is Oswald’s father George who says he searched the woodland on his quad bike and did not find her or any berries during his searches, he claims he is ‘the pope’ if she is telling the truth.

There were also unproven accusations she had been seen shopping in Walmart during the 25 days she was missing, however, there were no confirmed sightings of her.

ONE OF LISA’S MANY TATS CAN BE SEEN IN THE MISSING PERSON’S POSTER.

Sheriff Rodgers has his own theory. He said: ‘We are thinking they were all pretty much on drugs, I think she was on meth, she was hallucinating and she just got lost in the woods.

‘I don’t know how much drugs she took but I believe she was in there the whole time.’

Since getting home Miss Theris has given a series of TV interviews detailing her time in the woods and denying she is making the whole tale up to get away with robbery.

Since she inadvertently shot to fame, details about her wild ways and a scrape with the law concerning drunken and disorderly conduct have been revealed.

However, investigating officer in the case Sergeant Chad Faulkner, believes she is not lying and claimed the police were not ‘gullible or stupid’ but are ‘going off the evidence.’