I Have in My Hands Absolute Proof the Holocaust is a Hoax

When people move out of the apartment complex where I’m housed they often put out good furniture, electronics, washers, dryers, beds, and so forth next to or in the dumpsters.

Last week I fished a complete set of the 1971 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica out of the dumpster. I had a 1960 edition which was destroyed by my house fire. The books saved from the dumpster are similar in appearance. I’ve posted a picture of what they look like above.

There’s around 24 volumes of dense reading in each book. They’re heavy too. I could only realistically carry a few volumes at a time from the dumpsters up the stairs to my apartment. They probably weigh about five pounds each. Taken together, there must be at least several million words or more in the set.

Volume 11 covers Halicar through Immingham.

There is no entry in this volume for the word “Holocaust.”

Following the brief entry for Holmium, the next entry is for Holography.

Encyclopedias follow alphabetical order. The entry after Holmium should be Holocaust. It’s not there.

Currently, we are told that the Holocaust was the defining event of the 20th century. We are told that we must make it up to the Jews for all eternity, even self-genociding ourselves because of our evil nature.

The Encyclopedia Britannica was the authoritative source for information for the early years of my life, and indeed for many decades, if not centuries. The cover dates the books as going back to 1768. If the Holocaust were a true, recognized historical event there would be an entry for it in the book.

My recollections of high school and college history are that the Holocaust was not taught at all.

It seems that the Holocaust hadn’t been invented yet.

Today, I’m sure that every encyclocpedia has an article for the Holocaust. It’s a big industry. There are monuments and museums.

But somehow between the 1940s and 1971, no one had yet discovered the Holocaust.

The only reasonable conclusion is that the Holocaust is a work of fiction, designed to enrich Jews, protect Israel, and provide cover for the extermination of the evil white race.

If you’re inclined to disbelieve me, grab an old enclopedia when you find one and look up the term “Holocaust.” It won’t be there.

I’m not sure what year the fictional Holocaust narrative was created or who specifically created it. I suspect that it came out of someone’s fervid imagination in the latter part of the 1970s. If I come across another set of encyclopedia books from a later date, I’ll check it for an entry for the Holocaust.

Andrew Anglin: Jack Posobiec is a Textbook Ratfucker and He is Hurting the Trump Movement

Prominent Trump supporter and journalist Jack Pesobiac has been called out as a liar by Andrew Anglin at the Daily Stormer.

I’ve published one post that featured Posobiac. That was when he disrupted the Trump assassination play in Central Park with (((Laura Loomer.))) These two alt-light figures did something worthwhile in my opinion when they used the left’s tactics against them.

However, although I’ve used some of Pesobiac’s Tweets in different posts, I’ve been very careful to rarely use him as a news source. That’s because I noticed a few weeks ago that a number of his “scoops” and “exclusives” turned out to be incorrect.

I formed an opinion at several weeks ago that either he was lying by making things up or he was being fed garbage by his “sources.”

Yesterday, Anglin, in a long article, called out Pesobiac as damaging to the Trump movement because Pesobiac falsely claimed that HansAssholeSolo, the source of the Trump body slamming CNN meme, was 15 years old.

I’ve condensed Anglin’s post down to the essence. Read the whole article if you’ve previously been a Pesobiac follower.

Daily Stormer

“Ratfucker” is a term for someone who uses dirty tricks to manipulate politics.

Twitter personality Jack Posobiec (@JackPosobiec) is a ratfucker.

I believe that Posobiec made this up, outright. It is possible that someone from CNN could have leaked this information to him for disinformation purposes, but if that were the case, why is he not now coming out with that information? Surely, CNN leaking disinformation to him would in itself be a story, no?

And was his intention here really to help Team Trump?

We can’t know his personal motives, of course, but there is very little positive that could have come from this, and such a large potential negative in giving CNN the opportunity to distort the entire discussion. And of course, the main beneficiary here was his Twitter feed.

Jack Posobiec’s Twitter Feed: Anatomy of a Ratfucking Hoax Machine
In the time since Trump’s victory, Posobiec has gone from being a clever dirty tricks operator to being a chronic liar and hoaxer, using falsehoods simply to give himself an edge in the new media landscape.

Having observed him more closely than I otherwise would have over the last two weeks, I have found that he is using an absolutely absurd strategy to promote himself on Twitter: basically, he makes up all kinds of things which he believes to be non-falsifiable, while claiming the information comes from insider connections he has.

He is using several measures to decide what to make up.

Plausibility – He makes claims that could come true and thus bolster his credibility and his image as a man with reliable insider sources.

Unfalsifiability – He continually decides which rats to fuck based on an inability for the claims to be proven false, in the case that they do not turn out to be true. This generally involves making a prediction, but framing it as “sources are telling me…”

Sensationalism – The claims must be scandalous in order to get those retweets.

Following the HanAssholeSolo ratfucking attempt by Jack Posobiec, I think it is now absolutely fair to say that this man is a liability who is actively harming the entire spectrum of the Trump movement with his self-serving lies and hoaxes.

I encourage you all to follow Posobiec on Twitter and call him out as a ratfucker whenever he makes these “insider” claims. Maybe he will stop it, maybe he won’t – but if he doesn’t, then he needs to get the reputation of being #RatfuckerJack so that the events of this week are not repeated.

In the future, whenever there is a rumor that can be traced back to #RatfuckerJack, do not take it seriously and do not spread it.

I took a quick look at Jack’s Tweets. So far, there’s no reply to Anglin that I saw.

Immigrant Scum are Pretending They Lost Homes in London Highrise Fire to Get Money

GRENVILLE TOWER.

THE SAND MONKEY’S SCAM FAILED.

The Grenville Tower fire in London last week was occupied 90 percent by Musloid parasites, housed by the British government in what amounts to public housing.

Some crooked parasites who did not live there have decided to take advantage of white altruism by falsely claiming to be fire victims.

metro.co.uk

A man has been accused of pretending to be a victim of the Grenfell Tower tragedy to receive money from sympathetic strangers.

Furious crowds surrounded the man in central London, with some people shouting and swearing at him and others trying to take the cardboard sign he was holding.

Photographs sent to Metro.co.uk show the man with the sign reading: ‘I’m legend victim which didn’t get help after Grenfell Tower fire.’

Ben Keenan said he became suspicious after spotting him in Oxford Street on Monday.

The 36-year-old of Clapham Junction said he challenged the alleged victim, but the man was not able to give the postcode or location of Grenfell Tower and became ‘belligerent’ when questioned.

Ben told Metro.co.uk: ‘It was obvious he was pulling a fast one.

‘It didn’t seem like he was completely compos mentis.

‘A big crowd formed around him. One guy was saying ‘I lost a cousin in the fire’ and told him to take the sign down.

‘The reaction was a mixture of shock, disgust, and eventually anger.’

The man was reportedly moved along a few minutes later.

Ben said he believed residents of the tower block would not need to ask for money in the street as they have access to emergency funding and support.

He added: ‘If someone was a victim of that there is £5 million in a fund.

‘There is no reason for him to be standing in Oxford Street with a piece of cardboard.’

He also said a friend who had seen the pictures claimed to have previously seen the man and said he is a street performer in Leicester Square.

A spokesperson for the Met Police said: ‘On the afternoon of Monday 19th June in Oxford Street, local Westminster officers were made aware of a man with a placard referring to the Grenfell Tower fire.

‘Police spoke to the individual and words of advice were given. No criminal offences were substantiated. The man was referred onto the relevant authorities.’

Deport him. He’s a sociopath.

Jones vs. Kelly: Finally Over?

The embedded video above shows Alex Jones, Mike Cernovich, and Steve Pieczenik talking about the lies and distortions that Megyn Kelly brought to the table with her segment on Jones Sunday night.

NBC is blocking the publication of Megyn Kelly’s “interview” with Alex Jones on youtube. You can watch it on the Megyn Kelly webpage.

Kelly’s interview is a hatchet job. Until I heard the biased language coming from Kelly and her guests I never knew that anyone considered the Fat Man to be offensive because of his presentation of alternate views of some of the major news events of this century–9/11, the Sandy Hook shootings, Obama’s birth certificate, and more. The thing that bothered most of the conspiracy realists I follow was his failure to address the Jewish Question.

You have to believe that the sudden mainstream media interest in Jones is related to his relationship with President Donald Trump. By smearing Jones, some of the mud splatters upon Trump too.

When you consider that the press smears Trump a dozen times a day, seven days a week with their fake news narratives, why would anyone trust the press to tell the truth about Jones or any other “deplorable”?

Furthermore, when you consider the Neocon’s love of war and hostility to freedom, why would you trust the government to tell the truth?

All of the stories related to Kelly’s 17 minutes of anti-Jones, anti-Trump material stick with the narrative that Jones is evil and dangerous.

Excerpt from Variety

The one strong takeaway from the entire segment was that Jones is newsworthy and dangerous because he has the ear of our volatile president. The segment starts with that sentiment, and then proceeds to enumerate various situations in which Jones is a concerning public figure (including an interview with Neil Heslin, who lost his son in the Sandy Hook tragedy). Then it ends. To be sure, Kelly is right to observe that the connection is worth investigating. But the “Sunday Night” segment doesn’t seem like investigating; it’s instead a wind-up to a punch with no subsequent impact.

At least Variety acknowledges Kelly’s failures. But that’s probably because liberals hate her for her prior association with Fox News.

Excerpt from Deadline

One of Kelly’s fiercest critics, watchdog site Media Matters, called the broadcast “a report that was originally billed as a self-promotional head-to-head showdown with Alex Jones but got turned into “a well-edited investigation of the dangers posed by an unstable megalomaniac with millions of loyal fans, including one in the Oval Office” owing to a “well-deserved firestorm of denunciations.”

Insisting that Kelly deserves little credit for the changes the org warned its damage already had been done, saying “the network’s impotent reaction to Jones’ own grabs for media attention may allow the nation’s biggest producer of conspiracy theory media to come out the winner of tonight’s program.”

Jones seemed to agree. On YouTube, he live-streamed himself breaking open a bottle of champagne and calling the broadcast a big win.

Kellybots will follow her lead and spend Monday at the watercooler at work echoing the nonsense that Jones is dangerous. He may be loud and he may not get everything right and he may even be controlled opposition, but questioning 9/11 and Sandy Hook is patriotic, not dangerous.

The dirtbags at NBC and the liberal media don’t understand the appeal of Alex Jones. I could only find one article that treats him fairly.

Excerpt from American Thinker

Considering the longer term, Jones is in touch with and riding the wave of a powerful new meme that’s gaining currency worldwide. Its adherents believe that the game is stacked against the middle class as powerful and often unseen Deep State actors, globalists, the media, academia, popular culture, government bureaucracies, and other corrupt players conspire to transform for the worse life as we know it. Peaceful opposition to this onslaught is, as Jones has defined it – the Infowar. The Internet and the new media are making more plausible a worldwide wake-up call and a paradigm shift in information, awareness, and action. And they aren’t going away.

Meanwhile, one wonders what the NBC suits are thinking now about their widely reported $15 million-plus investment in their new golden girl, Megyn Kelly. She is decidedly not an Infowarrior or open in the least to the emerging new paradigm. And as her work at NBC is demonstrating, she is not even a good journalist.

Styx, not a fan of Jones or Kelly also gets it.

Twitter reactions:

“Liar, Leaker:” Trump Fans Breathe Sigh of Relief After Friday A.M. Tweet About Comey Breaks Two-Day Silence

Zerohedge

Trump Slams “Liar, Leaker” Comey, Claims “Total And Complete Vindication”

After an uncharacteristic two-day social media silence, in which some wondered if White House lawyers had finally taken control of Trump’s iPhone, President Trump broke a nearly two-day silence on Twitter Friday morning to slam James Comey as a “liar” and a “leaker” the day after the fired FBI director’s testimony before Congress.

In the tweet, which may be the first of many, Trump claimed “total and complete vindication” from the Senate Intel Committee hearing, in which Comey likewise accused him of “lies” and requesting the FBI end a criminal investigation.

Despite a brief statement by his private lawyer following Comey’s three hour testimony, Trump had remained silent on Twitter throughout Thursday surprising many, when much of the U.S. was glued to the TV screen, following every word in Comey’s first public comments since the president fired him early last month.

Comey said he believed Trump terminated him over the FBI’s investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, he also revealed that he had authorized a close friend to leak a memo to the NYT. “I didn’t do it myself for a variety of reasons, but I asked him to because I thought that might prompt the appointment of a special counsel,” Comey said. Comey also disclosed that Loretta Lynch had exerted pressure on him during the Hillary Clinton probe.

During the highly charged hearing with the Senate Intelligence Committee, a blunt-talking Comey said that he was “confused” and “concerned” when Trump said in May that he was firing him for undermining the morale of the agency he had led since 2013.

“The administration then chose to defame me, and more importantly, the FBI by saying the organization was in disarray, that it was poorly led, that the workforce had lost confidence in its leader,” Comey said.

We now look forward to Comey’s response, as Trump appears unwilling to let it go.

Another Zerohedge article features Tucker Carlson’s concise analysis of one of the biggest news events in recent memory. In less than seven minutes, Tucker summarizes the entire Comey testimony and questioning.

There’s a lot of amateur legal analysis being posted all over the Internet in relation to Trump and Comey. Obviously, anyone can play amateur lawyer. Here are a few of the better points made in the comments at the Zerohedge pieces.

Handful of Dust froze25 Jun 9, 2017 7:18 AM
Four-Star General leane was interviewed by Cavuto yesterday and said Comey’s story is just that, a story and a lie. He does not beleive Trump said those things to Comey and the meetings did not go as Comey testifed.

Meanwhile, both Bill Bennet and Karl Rove said Comey’s admissions under oath show he should be indicted.

Another interesting fact that proves Comey hangs aorund with a sordid bunch is that the Columbia lawyer Comey gave the ino to leak to the press lives in Brooklyn Heights in THE SAME building as Lena Dunham!

Tell me that’s coincidence!

nmewn FrozenGoodz Jun 9, 2017 8:04 AM
The take aways…

Confirmation the DNC refused the FBI access to its servers, why?

The DNC then hired CrowdStrike, presumably giving them access to its servers, again why?

Lowrenta Lynch ordered Comey to change his language and a call a criminal investigation a “matter”, why?

We learned from the hapless boobs at the NYT’s there are four “past & present government officials who wish to remain anonymous.”

We learned “the leakers” only leaked what they thought damaging to Trump, not that he was never under investigation even though all senators privy to that information knew it yet said nothing.

lester1 Jun 9, 2017 7:08 AM
Jeff Sessions needs to get off his ass and appoint a special prosecutor for Loretta Lynch and James Comey and the murder investigation of DNC email leaker Seth Rich !!

Wtf are you doing Jeff ????

Thom Paine Jun 9, 2017 7:35 AM
Comey has admitted to a number of criminal acts I think.

He admitted leaking FBI information to the media

He admitted leaking FBI information to the media in order to have an effect on the country (ie a counsel)

He admitted he was concerned enough with his meeting with Trump to make a memo of it – instead of going to the DOJ as required by law

He admitted he was concerned with Lynch telling him to not use the word investigation (which was the truth) and agreeing to it, instead of resigning or reporting it.

He demonstrates that he leaked information to the media, but not the truth that Trump was not under investigation – thus showing politcal bias in his job.

There are a few crimes there that I gather the DOJ has no option but to prosecute, how can it not? Since they are also prosecuting Winner for the exact same thing?

Law professor Jonathan Turley suggests that Comey’s leaking of the FBI memo is a crime.

Trump’s Attorney Marc Kasowitz Responds to Leaker and Liar Comey’s Testimony (Text and Video)

President Donald Trump let his lawyer and his son Donald Jr. do his talking and Tweeting for him today.

Tentacle porn has broken into the top of the news cycle today, somewhat derailing the true big story–the Senate testimony of former FBI Director James Comey. I assume that the relationship of Jew reporter Kurt Eichenwald to tentacle porn is intended as a distraction from a story that left the enemies of Donald Trump butt hurt in a bad way.

I’ve bolded the most significant takeaways, which will be analyzed many times over in the next few days.

CNBC

Below are Kasowitz’s remarks, unedited as prepared for delivery:

I am Marc Kasowitz, President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Contrary to numerous false press accounts leading up to today’s hearing, Mr. Comey has now finally confirmed publicly what he repeatedly told the President privately: The President was not under investigation as part of any probe into Russian interference. He also admitted that there is no evidence that a single vote changed as a result of any Russian interference.

Mr Comey’s testimony also makes clear that the President never sought to impede the investigation into attempted Russian interference in the 2016 election, and in fact, according to Mr. Comey, the President told Mr. Comey “it would be good to find out” in that investigation if there were “some ‘satellite’ associates of his who did something wrong.” And he did not exclude anyone from that statement.

Consistent with that statement, the President never, in form or substance, directed or suggested that Mr. Comey stop investigating anyone, including suggesting that that Mr. Comey “let Flynn go.” As he publicly stated the next day, he did say to Mr. Comey, “General Flynn is a good guy, he has been through a lot,” and also “asked how is General Flynn is doing.” Admiral Rogers testified that the President never “directed to do anything . . . illegal, immoral, unethical or inappropriate” and never “pressured to do so.” Director Coates said the same thing. The President likewise never pressured Mr. Comey.

The President also never told Mr. Comey, “I need loyalty, I expect loyalty” in form or substance. Of course, the Office of the President is entitled to expect loyalty from those who are serving in an administration, and, from before this President took office to this day, it is overwhelmingly clear that there have been and continue to be those in government who are actively attempting to undermine this administration with selective and illegal leaks of classified information and privileged communications. Mr. Comey has now admitted that he is one of these leakers.

Today, Mr. Comey admitted that he unilaterally and surreptitiously made unauthorized disclosures to the press of privileged communications with the President. The leaks of this privileged information began no later than March 2017 when friends of Mr. Comey have stated he disclosed to them the conversations he had with the President during their January 27, 2017 dinner and February 14, 2017 White House meeting. Today, Mr. Comey admitted that he leaked to friends his purported memos of these privileged conversations, one of which he testified was classified. He also testified that immediately after he was terminated he authorized his friends to leak the contents of these memos to the press in order to “prompt the appointment of a special counsel.” Although Mr. Comey testified he only leaked the memos in response to a tweet, the public record reveals that the New York Times was quoting from these memos the day before the referenced tweet, which belies Mr. Comey’s excuse for this unauthorized disclosure of privileged information and appears to entirely retaliatory. We will leave it the appropriate authorities to determine whether this leaks should be investigated along with all those others being investigated.

In sum, it is now established that the President was not being investigated for colluding with the Russians or attempting to obstruct that investigation. As the Committee pointed out today, these important facts for the country to know are virtually the only facts that have not leaked during the long course of these events.

As he said yesterday, the President feels completely vindicated and is eager to continue moving forward with his agenda with this public cloud removed.

Thank you.

NPR digs a bit into Kasowitz’s response. There’ll be ten thousand articles written on today’s testimony and later the books will come out.

Colored Gentleman Charged with MURDER for Not Telling White Girlfriend He Had AIDS

MUDSHARK KIMBERLY KLEMPNER DIED OF AIDS.

Everyone knows that ladies and gentlemen of color are infested with STDs, the result of their promiscuous, animalistic mating habits.

Everyone knows and studies have shown that ladies and gentlemen of color are pathological liars. It’s why our ancestors really wouldn’t put them on the witness stand at trials, with rare exceptions.

Mores may change, but it’s still true that mating with a gentleman of color is about the lowest, low-class thing that a white woman can do.

And yet still some of them do it.

And they die.

metro.co.uk

A married man accused of not telling his longtime girlfriend that he was HIV-positive was charged with murder after the woman died of AIDS.

A judge on Tuesday set bond at $1.5 million for Ronald Murdock, who was indicted last week in the February death of 51-year-old Kimberly Klempner.

Murdock, 51, of Toledo, who also is charged with felonious assault. A message seeking comment on the accusations was left with his attorney.

Murdock and Klempner had unprotected sex when he knew he was HIV positive, but he did not tell her, the indictment said. They were involved in a five-year relationship, Klempner’s son said.

A police report said Murdock’s wife discovered that Murdock and Klempner were having an affair and told Klempner that Murdock was HIV positive.

RONALD MURDOCK.

‘By the time she found out and by the time everything was said and done, it was way too late,’ said Josh Klempner.

His mother’s death certificate listed the cause of death as AIDS.

‘She would have done anything for that man,’ Josh Klempner said. ‘And for him not to come out in the beginning and tell her what was going on was not right.’

JOSH KLEMPNER, GRANDMOTHER KIMBERLY, AND GRANDSON.

Ohio is among a large group of states that have HIV criminal laws, which generally make it a crime to expose others to HIV or fail to disclose HIV-positive status.

A growing number of advocacy groups and health experts have pushed for states to modify or eliminate those laws. Most of the measures were enacted before antiretroviral therapies greatly reduced the risk of transmission and transformed HIV – the virus that causes AIDS – into what is now considered a manageable chronic medical condition.

MUH NIGGA.

MURDOCH AND WIFE.

The Sun reports that granny found out her ape had AIDS when she searched his medicine cabinet.

There are going to be female social justice warriors reading this post who are going to be totally pissed at me for being waycisss. Yet, every word I’ve written is true. At least I’m trying to save a life or two, which is more than the SJWs can say.

Truth is often racist. Mudsharking = death.