Video: Stefan Molyneaux and Twitter’s Bill Mitchell Discuss Syria

POKING FUN AT BILL MITCHELL, ON THE RIGHT. MILO ON THE LEFT.

Bill and Stefan Molyneaux got together to debate the recent American military action in Syria. That debate is embedded below.

Bill Mitchell follows traditional conservatives in being gung-ho toward American military action. Molyneaux is a libertarian. There’s a big difference.

Stefan opposes America’s self declared role as policeman of the world, while Mitchell strongly approves.

I agree with Stefan, but Mitchell gets to make his points. Molyneaux does not shout over his guests the way some do.

I watched over an hour of the hour and 16 minutes. To me, this video is worth watching if you have the time. To be more accurate, I didn’t watch so much as listen as I did research for other posts. The points being made were a constant distraction, catching my interest.

Published on Apr 10, 2017

MP3: http://www.fdrpodcasts.com/#/3646/deb…
Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/stefan-molyneu…

Do you support President Donald Trump’s military intervention in Syria and the Middle East as a whole? Bill Mitchell joins Stefan Molyneux for a thorough discussion and debate on the recent military action in Syria, the threats of regime change, the possible removal of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, the history of American foreign interventions, the reliability of U.S. intelligence, avoiding World War 3 and if this damages Trump’s how this impacts the America First campaign promise.

Bill Mitchell is the host and creator of YourVoice Radio and one most influential non-candidates on social media the election cycle – with 200,000+ Twitter followers and millions of impressions daily.

Follow Bill on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/mitchellvii
YourVoice Radio: http://www.yourvoiceradio.com

Company introduces ‘snowflake test’ to weed out ‘whiny, entitled millennials’

Deep State British propagandist Metro News serves up a heapin’ helpin’ of leftist bias in its reporting on a business owner who wants to hire his kind of people.

Metro would go down easier without its constantly slanted reporting. Recognize it as mixing news with indoctrination.

Any liberty lover would grant a business owner the right to hire people to his liking.

metro.co.uk

Trigger warning! Millennials may want to retreat to their ‘safe spaces’ after a company introduced a ‘snowflake test’ specifically to weed them out.

A (ridiculously macho) American company has introduced a quiz for applicants – full of questions designed specifically to weed out ‘whiny, entitled millennials’.

This being America, it’s full of crazy stuff about how much you love guns and how patriotic you are – and CEO Kyle Reyes actually seems proud of the fact 60% of applicants drop out after hearing about the test.

Yeah, #MAGA, dude! And whatever else it is that low-IQ Trump supporters like to say!

Reyes says, ‘A snowflake is somebody who is going to whine and complain and come to the table with nothing but an entitled attitude and an inability to back their perspective.’

The questions include, ‘What does America mean to you?’, and ‘When was the last time you cried and why?’

In case you aren’t already barfing up your breakfast, here’s the full quiz.

Link to video with Reyes discussing the snowflake test

One quick final thought. This test is probably just a marketing gimmick. You know it’s going to weed out blacks and Latinos. Thus, the American courts would find it discriminatory. Kyle Reyes is playing us, I think.

Tara McCarthy Interviews Styxhexenhammer666: Ethno Nationalism, Meme Magick, and Democracy

Tara McCarthy is one of those attractive young white female journalists with an interest in white identity. You can see her worthwhile Twitter page for examples of the kinds of stories that interest her.

Styxhexenhammer666 has a large following among youthful politically incorrect white people. His Twitter is here.

Read the following entry on him at the youtube wiki and then watch a little of the video to see if his analysis of current events offers anything of value to you.

Youtube wiki

Styxhexenhammer666, real name Tarl Warwick, is a YouTuber who shares his views on various topics of interest such as religion, politics, world events, occultism and posts other miscellaneous material. He is known for his ability to speak continuously for over twenty minutes without editing.

Overview
A typical video has him sitting in his house with his microphone in view expressing his opinions on politics and current events. Not all of his videos are of him speaking his mind on camera. For example, he has uploaded music videos by Charles Manson, videos of his garden, promotion of his occult literary works and more recently the opening of field ration packs.

Many of his videos, especially between 2011 and 2014 have been about religion. His religious background is that as a child, he was a deist Christian until becoming a fundamentalist Christian at the age of 15. When he became an adult, he started researching religions and came to the belief that religion was a negative force and became an Atheist. For a while he considered himself an independent Satanist before leaving the philosophy for Paganism. He has been mistaken for being a devil worshipper because of the name “Satanism”, but he was actually an Atheistic Satanist, a form of Satanism that uses the name “Satan” as a symbol of rebellion against Christianity, he never believed in a literal Satan.

He had previously uploaded trip reports from when he used recreational drugs. He stopped using drugs in 2010 after a severe overdose from a type of synthetic marijuana known as “Spice” that sent him to a psychiatric ward. He said it took many months before he felt normal again and advised that no one should ever use the substance.

During 2016, his videos became increasingly focused on the 2016 United States presidential election. Initially, he endorsed Garry Johnson of the Libertarian Party, until he felt he could no longer support Johnson due to differences in views on Islamic immigration and switched his support to Donald Trump. Even before he unendorsed Garry Johnson, he predicted that Donald Trump would win presidency and also voted for Trump in the Vermont primaries, making him one of very few political commentators to successfully predict the outcome of the general election.

His videos can be controversial and he is not afraid to express opinions considered to be unpopular. Beginning with Charles Manson, he has expressed his belief that Manson was innocent and should be released from prison. During the years when most of his uploads were about religion, he expressed his fair share of anti-religious sentiment, especially towards Christianity, Judaism and Islam. He also considered himself to be the most anti-religious person in Vermont. He has admitted to receiving death threats from Christians due his anti-Christian videos, although he said he never had a problem with liberal Christians, it was the fundamentalist Christians had a problem with.

Political views
Tarl Warwick’s political views are complex and have been known to change over time. Views expressed include anti-religion, populism, classical liberalism, drug legalization, pro-abortion, right to bear arms, cultural nationalism, anti-globalization and apocalypticism. Examples of how his political views have changed over time include how he used to consider himself a Liberal around 2009, but later became a Libertarian. Another example was in 2016 when he abandoned his support for the Libertarian Party in favor of Donald Trump, after saying a year earlier that he would never vote for Trump.

He opposes the European Union and has made videos in support of Eurosceptic right-wing populist parties, such as the Freedom Party of Austria and National Front in France. He also urged all his British viewers to vote to leave the EU in the 2016 Brexit referendum.

Warwick is critical of open-door immigration policies such as those in place in Europe because he believes the people do not assimilate to into a common culture and allows entry to Islamic extremists. He believes multiculturalism has failed but multiethnicism can work if assimilation is encouraged.

Warwick has attracted a following from the alt-right, a loosely formed political movement centred around white nationalism. He has said in 2016 that he is “not really on the alt-right”, but appeared sympathetic to the movement. In September 2016, he appeared as a guest on Red Ice TV, a YouTube channel which describes itself as “predominately focusing on issues concerning European survival” where he admitted he was on the fringes of the alt-right. In a video posted on December 31, 2016, he mentioned about being more than happy to called “alt-lite”.

Black Guns Matter: The Movement to Put Guns into Black Hands to INCREASE Public Safety

MAJ TOURE, FOUNDER OF BLACK GUNS MATTER.

Do you think that arming blacks in a place like Chicago would make it safer if those blacks were trained to use firearms in self defense?

The Sun

A PRO-GUN campaigner says the wave of deadly gun violence in cities like Chicago can be tackled with more guns and better firearms training.

Maj Toure is the founder of Black Guns Matter, an organisation that aims to educate urban populations about their Second Amendment rights.

He claims more guns are the answer to America’s gun crime epidemic and believes that years of prejudice have convinced urban populations to associate guns with crime rather than defending themselves, their communities and their rights.

Maj, who was raised in north Philadelphia, said: “Growing up, people always told me that firearms were bad, and that if you have a firearm you either have to be the bad guy or you are law enforcement.

“That’s a lie. It’s just not true. The problem is the lack of information and education about firearms and safety in urban areas.

“There is a deliberate attempt to keep that information away from these highly populated areas because it’s not about gun control, it’s about people control.”

However, the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence claims stats suggest removing guns from cities works better, saying ‘guns make violent situations deadly’.

Maj, who formed Black Guns Matter in 2016, has been taking his message across the United States for the past year, visiting areas such as Atlanta, Baltimore and Detroit.

The 29-year-old has also visited Chicago, where there were 3,550 shooting incidents, 4,331 shooting victims and 762 murders in 2016.

Maj believes a greater understanding of laws and education around firearms in Chicago would bring more ‘respect for the tool’ and greater ‘trigger discipline’.

This along with better teaching of de-escalation tactics would help reduce gun violence.

Maj, who is not affiliated with the Black Lives Matter movement, said: “Clearly, gun legislation is not working. They have an extreme amount of gun control law and they still cracked 700 homicides last year.

“So what we do is inform the people better [about guns and the Second Amendment] to cut down on that.

“Information is always better than just legislation.

“A lot of times people in urban areas don’t even associate the Second Amendment with the hood.

“They associate the Second Amendment with guys in the military or crazy white guys down South.

“My job is to make sure that everybody understands the Second Amendment is for every citizen of America. It’s not my job to advocate more firearms. It’s my job to inform people about firearms.

“When you make something a taboo and you ignore it and pretend like it isn’t an issue, then there is no education and no knowledge – and a lack of knowledge is always dangerous.”

According to the American Trends Panel more than twice the amount of white people own legal guns compared to black people.

And while 51 per cent of people in rural areas own a legal gun, just 25 per cent of people in cities own a gun.

Black people were also two-and-a-half times times more likely to be shot by law enforcement than white people in 2015, despite black people making up 13 per cent of the population.

On his trips, Maj meets with community leaders in some of the poorest areas to educate people on their rights to bear arms.

Depending on state laws, they learn what rights they have against the police, sign up to get legal firearms and concealed and carry licenses, and also learn how to shoot properly.

As a conservative and a libertarian I’m for everyone exercising his gun rights. As a race realist, I fear that putting guns into the hands of blacks would be no different than putting them in the hands of children. There’s a lack of self control in the darker race.

What say you? Here’s a black man with a gun:

Richard Spencer’s Mentor Paul Gottfried Explains the Left’s Permanent Outrage and Their Hatred of Us

BERKELEY, 1960s.

THIS YEAR.

The women’s marches, the topless protests, the riots wherever MILO speaks, the violence toward Trump supporters–all this and more will NEVER stop unless modern Marxism is totally eradicated from the West.

Hell, the weak Republicans in America don’t have a clue about how to fight Marxist tyranny because they’ve bought into Marxist egalitarianism.

(((Paul Gottfried))), the original mentor to Richard Spencer, explains the tactics of today’s Marxists:

Excerpt from Lew Rockwell

There is no way that the Left can retreat from what it has achieved in transforming society without the entire edifice of change being imperiled. This corresponds to Trotsky’s formula that if the revolution is made to retreat from stage D to stage C, then the entire march toward the new society could be reversed. Therefore the march out of the gloomy repressive past must be continued unconditionally, and any retreat from it is tantamount to counterrevolution — or in the leftist fear-mongering phrase, having women forced to have abortions in back alleys, re-imposing racial segregation, and jailing homosexuals. This kind of thinking makes perfectly good sense if one begins with the assumption that one is in an “all or nothing” situation. It also doesn’t matter that President Obama stopped flights to the U.S. from Iraq in 2011 or that Bill Clinton spoke in a State of the Union address in 1994 about stopping the presence of illegals in the U.S. Nor should we notice that Donald Trump’s predecessor opposed gay marriage at the time he was elected to the presidency. It is our duty to protect whatever revolution is underway in its most advanced state. Any retreat from the present into the past, even the recent past, should be seen as an attempt to undo every bit of Progress that’s been gained until now.

Anyone who threatens the still fragile, reversible process of change must be dehumanized. There can be no honest disagreements with those who either by design or because of dangerous ignorance are working against “hope and change.” One is, therefore, justified in condemning these reactionaries as the lowliest and most malevolent of beings. Like the Communists, the current Left, particularly in Western Europe, characterizes its opponents as “fascists.” Note that for the old Left, “fascism” had a quasi-scientific meaning. It referred to the defenders of a form of late capitalism, which had already reached a point of mortal crisis. “Fascists” repressed socialist revolution by creating right-wing nationalist dictatorships. In the process, phony “fascist” revolutionaries drove real leftist revolutionaries underground.

For the multicultural Left, by contrast, the once meaningful Marxist term “fascist” has been reduced to a smear. It now signifies those the Left is combatting, that is, those who disagree with all or some aspect of the Left’s social agenda. Those who oppose this agenda may or perhaps should be attacked as Nazis and even Holocaust-deniers (which an acquaintance of mine recently called me for voting for Donald Trump). If the people under attack don’t deny Nazi crimes explicitly, their view of “social justice” is so hopelessly negative that presumably, they would have enthusiastically endorsed Hitler. What else should one think of someone who is trying to push us back into the Dark Ages, perhaps as far back as 2008?

Before I read this piece, I had slowly come to the conclusion that the war on the white race, the war on decency, the war on tradition, and so forth would not stop short of an ethnic cleansing of the leftist Jews (Soros, his puppets and his puppet masters, etc.) who foment agitation and control the press, using it for some really ludicrous propaganda.

Buckle your seat belts because the insanity from the left has NOT reached peak insanity yet.

Trump is NOT Crazy, Just Crazy Like a Fox

That Trump Tweet above is a good example of President Trump’s style. The media had swarmed him with accusations of ruining America’s relationship with Australia in one phone call to PM Malcolm Turnbull about Australia sending Muslim “refugees” to America in a deal brokered by ex-President Obasma.

Between Trump’s 3 A.M. Tweets and his manly style, involving pushback, the media’s preference for pajama-boy Obama is coming across loud and clear. The easy route to smearing Trump is to say he’s crazy.

Regular Lew Rocwell contributor Michael Rozeff wrote this brief piece refuting the media’s claims about Trump’s mental state. This post is a companion to the post just published that focuses on former Swedish PM Goran Persson’s claim that Trump is crazy.

Lew Rockwell

The Left and some Republicans are attacking Trump as a madman. The media are taking this tack. They are mightily confused, shocked and thrashing around.

However, Trump’s actions and style are both rational. He is not a lunatic, not crazy, not erratic and not acting at random. What he’s doing is no less calculated or rational than anything that Bush or Obama did in the past 16 years, although I admit that sets a pretty low hurdle. Trump is no fool. What critics bemoan as “chaos” consists of calculated effects.

He has definite goals in mind. He’s engaged in political shock therapy. He is also smart enough to bob and weave, mixing his statements up in ways to confuse his opposition, all the while placing them on the defensive. He has to use shock tactics and quickly if he wants to change anything, because the existing system is so frozen in place. The system is crusted over with frozen paths and barriers of money and power. He’s out to smash the psychology of it and its comfort level. He is not letting himself be captured by established interests, although he may feign such accommodation temporarily. Trump is a very clever man, from what I can see of how he’s operating.

His style of dickering with other politicians overseas is designed to shake them up and force them into channels they’re not used to. Even their defensive reactions may be exactly what he wants from them. He’s breaking down the stuffy and guarded bureaucratic ways of assessing issues by his blunt language. This is designed to awake new ways and approaches to relations that are now frozen in ways he dislikes.

This assessment is only of Trump’s mind and methods. It doesn’t attempt to say whether he will succeed, and it doesn’t evaluate the content of his goals.

I once had a young Latina college girl who had what seemed like a hundred boyfriends say that her secret to dealing with men was to “keep them off balance.” Haha.

I think that’s Trump’s secret too. He keeps his enemies off balance. By the time they respons to one of Trump’s “outrages,” he’s moved on to another one.

#nevertrump California to Vote on Secession

There’s a concise explanation of how secession would work in this piece from RT.

A proposal for California to break away from the United States has been submitted to the Secretary of State’s Office in the state capital. If it qualifies, it could trigger a vote on whether the most populous US state should become a separate nation.

The group behind the proposal, Yes California Independence Campaign, was cleared on Thursday by Californian Secretary of State Alex Padilla to begin the bid to collect some 600,000 voter signatures required to put the ambitious plan on the ballot, AP reported. The initiative would ask voters to repeal part of the state constitution that declares California an “inseparable part of the United States of America.”

The proposed constitutional amendment, titled California Nationhood, would also ask voters to repeal the clause that describes the US Constitution as the “supreme law of the land.” If approved, it suggests scheduling a vote in March 2019 to ask Americans, “Should California become a free, sovereign and independent country?”

The initiative maintains that the election “shall constitute a Declaration of Independence from the United States of America” if two key conditions are met: at least 50 percent of registered voters participate and at least 55 percent vote ‘Yes’.

If both of conditions are satisfied, the measure requires submission to the United Nations of an application for the “newly-independent Republic of California” to be a UN member state, the initiative says, as cited by the Sacramento-based Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO).

Being a US state is “no longer serving California’s best interests,” the movement claims.

“Not only is California forced to subsidize this massive military budget with our taxes, but Californians are sent off to fight in wars that often do more to perpetuate terrorism than to abate it. The only reason terrorists might want to attack us is because we are part of the United States and are guilty by association. Not being a part of that country will make California a less likely target of retaliation by its enemies,” the campaign argues, among other things.

“America already hates California, and America votes on emotions,” Marcus Evans, vice-president of Yes California told to the Los Angeles Times.

“I think we’d have the votes today if we held it,” he added.

It must submit the valid voter signatures by July 25 to qualify for the November 2018 ballot.

The number of Californians who would rather see their state a sovereign nation than part of the United States jumped to 32 percent, a new Reuters/Ipsos opinion poll showed earlier this week. In 2014, it was only 20 percent.

If Califonia goes, the first thing that happens is that California breaks up into several separate countries. Hostility from the different parts of California would lead to economic inefficiencies. The parts with WATER would have a huge advantage over the dry parts. Parts of California might also break away to become part of Mexico.

And if California goes, Texas would go. The South too.

Why not? Obviously, the interests of one part of the U.S. can vary tremendously from other parts. Libertarian Lew Rockwell had a recent piece on why the U.S. should break up into 2 countries, or 22, or even 222 countries.

The reality MIGHT be that military action against California politicians would have to be taken by the U.S. should California secede. I doubt that any president would undo Lincoln’s forced togetherness purchased by the blood and treasure of our ancestors.