Muzzie Woman Wins $85,000 Lawsuit for Being Stripped of Hijab for MUGSHOT

KIRSTY POWELL. GOTTA KEEP DAT DOO RAG ON OR ALLAH WILL PUNISH.

The nogs set up the police in order to tap the deep pockets of the city. Muslims will now be allowed to wear their headgear when a mugshot is taken.

CNN

The city of Long Beach, California, will pay $85,000 to settle a 2016 lawsuit filed by a Muslim woman after an officer forcibly removed her hijab, or headscarf, when she was in police custody.

The incident started when Kirsty Powell and her husband were pulled over by police for driving a “low rider” car, according to the lawsuit.

Powell was the passenger, but was arrested after police found a warrant under her name for a shoplifting incident.

Powell’s husband requested a female officer handle the arrest, according to the suit, but the arresting officers denied the request and told Powell she had to remove her hijab.

Powell spent the night in prison without her headscarf. It was returned when her husband posted her bond.

The lawsuit states Powell was “forced to appear in a publicly available booking photo without her religious headwear.”

Adding,” As a result of the foregoing deprivations of the free exercise of her religion, Kirsty Powell suffered severe discomfort, humiliation, and emotional distress.”

Powell filed the lawsuit in April 2016, alleging the police department had violated her First Amendment rights.

“She cried throughout the ordeal and experienced humiliation when both her religious beliefs and personal integrity were violated,” the lawsuit said.

CNN’s calls to the Long Beach City Attorney’s Office were not returned.

CNN affiliate KABC-TV reported the Long Beach Police Department changed its policy in November 2016 to allow an arrested person to wear religious headgear unless there is a safety concern.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations announced the settlement in a press release praising Powell.

“We commend Kirsty Powell for choosing to defend her right to religious freedom and taking action.”

Powell told the Council on American-Islamic Relations when she filed the suit she wanted to be the last Muslim woman who has this experience.

“I want my Muslim sisters to always feel comfortable and safe wearing a hijab and to stand up for what’s right,” she said.

Kirsty could have hung herself with that headscarf while in jail, which would have opened the cops up to even more legal liability than $85,000.

She gave up her right to claim a religious exemption when she allegedly committed a crime that her religion would not approve of. In the Muslim world, the hand of a thief is cut off.

Follow Sharia Law and cut off her hand.

Amputation is Islam.

Fox News Host Eric Bolling Sues Muslim Journalist for $50M Over Lewd Photo Allegation

Yashur Ali has been called out as crazy or sex obsessed before.

Eric Bolling, suspended Fox News host, has essentially labeled him a liar. It would be great to see a liberal Muslim writer ruined. He could always find work as a future taxi driver.

Excerpt from Hollywood Reporter

Yashar Ali is being sued over stories about sexual harassment via text message.
Recently suspended Fox News host Eric Bolling is suing journalist Yashar Ali for defamation and is seeking $50 million in damages.

The lawsuit comes just days after Ali wrote an Aug. 4 story for HuffPost claiming that more than a dozen sources told him Bolling sent “an unsolicited photo of male genitalia via text message to at least two colleagues at Fox Business and one colleague at Fox News.”

On Saturday, Fox News suspended Bolling — recently a host on the talk show Fox News Specialists and Cashin’ In and formerly of The Five — amid an investigation into the claims. He has worked at Fox News since 2008.

Ali wrote Wednesday on Twitter that he has received a summons from Bolling and says he stands by his reporting and will protect his sources. In the initial story, Ali says he spoke to 14 sources on the condition of anonymity because they either currently work at the networks, can’t speak to press without permission or signed confidentiality agreements.

The summons, which was filed Wednesday in New York state court, says Bolling is seeking both damages and injunctive relief arising from Ali’s efforts to injure his reputation through “intentional and/or highly reckless publication of actionable false and misleading statements” about his conduct and character.

HuffPost issued a statement in response to the summons: “Yashar Ali is a careful and meticulous reporter. We stand by his reporting.” Editor-in-chief Lydia Polgreen also wrote on Twitter that Ali is a paid freelancer under contract with HuffPost and the outlet has “no hesitation about standing by him financially in this case.”

Because Bolling is a public figure, to succeed on a defamation claim he will have to prove Ali either knew the information was false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth. He has retained Michael Bowe and Ronald Rossi from Kasowitz Benson Torres — the firm whose name partner Marc Kasowitz reps President Donald Trump. The firm also has ties to ousted Fox News host Bill O’Reilly.

In addition to HuffPost, Ali writes for Mother Jones and New York magazines. He has previously worked in politics, having served as deputy chief of staff to then-San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom.

Ali has been described in press reports as a “Los Angeles businessman” and was named a “Hillblazer” for Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, a term that refers to individuals “who have contributed and/or raised $100,000 or more for Hillary for America, the Hillary Victory Fund and/or the Hillary Action Fund since the launch of this historic campaign on April 12, 2015.”

Ali also noted that HuffPost isn’t named in the suit. “[H]e is coming after me personally,” he tweeted. “I’m a big boy…but very telling.”

‘No f— cops’! Gym bans police officers, military because they might offend minority members

JIM CHAMBERS, GYM OWNER.

Atlanta’s EAV Barbell Club looks like it might be owned by an ex-con. Jim Chambers has a tat by his eye that is associated with prison life.

His ban on police raises an interesting legal issue. No business can legally bar Niggers from entering. What if a Nigger cop goes into the gym and gets kicked out because he’s a cop. Which law would apply? The law that says a business owner can ban cops or the law that says he can’t ban the Negroid race.

While Chambers can’t be legally denied police protection, if I were a cop called to his place of business because Chambers had been robbed or beaten up, I would respond, but s l o w l y.

Certainly, during a Negroid riot, I would expect the cops to stand down while Chamber’s gym was looted and burned to the ground. He may think his “No cops” sign makes him in with his Nog buddies, but he doesn’t know the Nog that well.

Fox News

The owner of a gym in Atlanta is coming under fire after posting an obscene sign outside his business that states in part: “No f—— cops.”

The sign, which has since been removed, appeared outside of EAV Barbell Club on the east side of Atlanta, according to 11Alive. The full sign said: “Rules: Do whatever the hell you want, correctly, except Crossfit cultism. No f—— cops.”

The notice started to gain attention after a military veteran saw the message and reported it to media outlets.

Jim Chambers, the owner of the gym, told 11Alive he took responsibility for the sign and wanted the message to be clear.

“We’ve had an explicitly stated ‘no cop’ policy since we opened, and we also don’t open membership to active members of the military,” Chambers told NBC4i.

Chambers said law enforcement agents were not allowed in his business because their presence made his minority clientele uncomfortable.

The Atlanta Police Department did not comment on the ban but said, “Were we to respond to an emergency there, this sign would not stop us from lawfully doing our job.”

Chambers added: “If they have a warrant, they can go anywhere they want, but we’re not breaking the law.”

Chambers said he would put the sign back up at some point but claimed that he and his clients would not need the help of law enforcement in the future.

“It was really just that the vulgarity in that sign that seems to bring it out for people,” Chambers told 11Alive.

Chambers looks like he’s on illegal steroids. Is he dealing?

Enquiring police minds might want to know. LOL.

Conflicting Claims Mark $3 Million Former “Aryan Goddess” Taylor Swift Groping Lawsuit

TAYLOR SWIFT SEXUAL ASSAULT PHOTO.

For awhile back in 2016 I believe it was, Andrew Anglin had declared Taylor Swift to be an Aryan Goddess. He and his crew produced memes that showed Taylor spouting the words of Adolf Hitler.

Then Taylor’s lawyers sent Anglin a letter. He removed the material from his site under threat of a lawsuit. That was wise of him, not cowardly, in my opinion.

Since then, his enthusiasm for the lovely Miss Swift has diminished and he’s done many fewer posts on her.

Taylor is back in the news in regard to a legal issue, although Anglin is not involved. A DJ who may be a Jew and may not be has filed a $3 million lawsuit against the diva for falsely accusing him of sexually assaulting her by groping her bottom. She’s counter-suing him on principle, asking for $1.

Look at the position of Taylor’s left arm in the photo. Is she touching Mueller’s bottom? Look at David Mueller’s right arm. Is he touching her bottom. This photo is the key evidence in the case.

Would Taylor still be smiling if she were being sexually assaulted? Could Mueller’s girlfriend have felt up Taylor?

What’s your opinion? Share it by commenting below.

NOLA

A former radio disc jockey accused of groping Taylor Swift before a concert testified Tuesday that he may have touched the pop superstar’s ribs with a closed hand as he tried to jump into a photo with her but insisted he did not touch her backside as she claims.

David Mueller told jurors at the civil trial on dueling lawsuits filed by Mueller and Swift that he and the singer-songwriter were trying to reach around one another and “our hands touched and our arms touched” during a photo opportunity he estimated lasted no more than 40 seconds.

Under questioning by his attorney, Mueller said he may have touched Swift’s “rib cage, or rib, or ribs.”

The 2013 photo of Swift, Mueller and Mueller’s girlfriend taken at the pre-concert event in Denver is a key piece of evidence in Mueller’s suit claiming he was fired after being falsely accused by Swift. He is seeking at least $3 million.

The photo shows Mueller with his hand behind Swift, just below her waist. Both are smiling.

Her lawyers have called the photo “damning” proof that Mueller groped her.

Mueller’s lawyer, Gabriel McFarland, showed jurors the photograph during his opening remarks. Two jurors stared at the photo on their computer monitors while a few others kept glancing at it as McFarland spoke.

Swift has said she is positive it was Mueller who groped her.

Swift has countersued Mueller, claiming sexual assault. She is seeking a symbolic $1, saying she wants to serve as an example to other women who have been assaulted.

In his opening statement, Douglas Baldridge, an attorney for Swift. told jurors that his superstar client is “absolutely certain” she was sexually assaulted and will prove it in court.

Baldridge also asked what possible reason Swift would have to make up an allegation.

“That’s the one and only story we have to tell you — that Mr. Mueller grabbed her rear end,” he said.

Mueller’s attorney told jurors that inappropriate touching is wrong, but falsely accusing someone of the offense is equally unacceptable.

The trial continues.

Negro “Sovreign Citizen” Who Sued State for $11.5 BILLION Arrested for Shooting at Cops

JOHN JONES BEY. SHOOTING AT POLICE WILL PUT YOU IN JAIL.

The Sovereign Citizen movement must seem like a dream come true to the black man. Here’s a chance to stick it to the white man’s law. Except the white man’s law isn’t bending, much less breaking.

Indy Star

An Indianapolis man who believes the laws don’t apply to him and once sued the state for $11.5 billion was arrested Monday after a three-hour SWAT standoff.

John Jones Bey, 52, is facing three counts of attempted murder and three counts of criminal recklessness for his alleged role in the incident that played out Monday morning in the 3400 block of Kinnear Avenue.

According to a police report of the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department, Bey fired gunshots at three Center Township constables as they attempted to serve him an eviction order.

MPD officers responded around 9:30 a.m. Monday, and the SWAT team was called in to assist when the armed Bey refused to leave his home.

After more than three hours, Bey peacefully surrendered, police said. No one was injured during the incident, and officers at the scene recovered the handgun that Bey is accused of firing at the constables.

Bey was booked into the Marion County Jail on the preliminary charges of attempted murder and criminal recklessness. A final charging decision will be made by the Marion County Prosecutor’s Office.

According to a February decision from the the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, Bey considers himself a “sovereign citizen,” meaning that he does not believe the laws apply to him. He also does not believe that he can be lawfully taxed in the absence of a contract between him and the state.

Bey, who describes himself as an “Aboriginal Indigenous Moorish-American,” previously filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana what he labeled a “Writ of Mandamus.” Within it Bey was seeking to enjoin state and county officials from taxing property that he owns in Marion County.

Court documents said Bey also asked that state officials be ordered to refund the taxes that he’d paid and to compensate him for their alleged wrongs. He determined that the district court should award him $11.5 billion to cover the 40 years of taxes and the mental anguish caused by the taxation.

The court of appeals in February affirmed the decision of the district court, ruling against Bey.

As we always advise here, there are legal ways to go stealth and avoid paying at least some taxes, without resorting to illegal, fraudulent Sovereign Citizen arguments. Bone up on tax law and learn how to reduce, if not eliminate your taxes, if that’s important to you. Challenging government directly is rarely wise. Quietly withdrawing from the System is far better in terms of outcomes for you.

Asian Teacher Sentenced to 10 Years for Upskirt Photos of 14 Year Old Students

ADAM MAYR, AGE 39. CAN’T SEE HIM TEACHING AGAIN.

There are at least three issues relating to a gook teacher’s sex crimes involving students at the school where he taught.

1. The “model minority” is often sex crazed. Consider the insane Japanese porn, sex dolls, and pedophilia associated with that otherwise civilized country.

2. A ten year sentence for upskirt photos seems way too severe to me. Six months in jail seems about right. Am I wrong? I assume that part of the severity of the perp’s sentence in this case relates to the tender age of the girls photographed. Women teachers who actually have sex with students sometimes being sentenced to mere probation. Is this fair?

3. The story mentions that the perp is being sued on behalf of the victims. What would be the appropriate damages, if any, for the perp to be ordered to pay. Playing devil’s advocate, I don’t see much in the way of damages in a culture where young teens are sending their boyfriends nude photos, which end up being shared.

I am in no way defending the actions of Mayr, just trying to get a handle on what constitutes justice in cases like these. There are no allegations that Mayr attempted to have a sexual relationship with any student or that he shared the photos he took.

Courier Post

WOODBURY – A South Jersey teacher who secretly shot photos under female students’ skirts is sentenced to 10 years in state prison, according to the Gloucester County Prosecutor.

Adam L. Mayr, 39, was sentenced Friday to 10 years after pleading guilty to official misconduct and invasion of privacy.

Mayr — an English teacher at Gloucester County Institute of Technology in Deptford since 2002 — must serve at least five years of the sentence, according to prosecutor’s office spokesman Bernie Weisenfeld.

Mayr’s photos were discovered in 2015, but police said the man had allegedly recorded teenager girls for about two years. More than 20 teen girls, about the age of 14, were recorded, according to the prosecutor’s office.

Since his arrest, six civil lawsuits have been filed against Mayr on behalf of the students, the prosecutor’s office spokesman said.

Judging by his name, Mayr is American born. It doesn’t matter to me. He should be deported to the country from which his ancestors came (China? Vietnam? Phillipines?). As it is, after his release from prison, the best job he’ll get will be working in a Chinese laundry.

Britain: Muslim Acid Attackers Can Now Be Given Life Sentences

One measure of the failure of diversity is how the laws have to be changed when a country is invaded and colonized by an alien force.

British law is now being forced to direct attention toward acid attacks. The cowardly Evening Standard won’t even provide an example of a Muslim attacker, although that’s what this change in the law is all about.

Evening Standard

Thugs who carry acid on the streets will face up to four years in prison under a new crackdown announced today by prosecutors.

The Crown Prosecution Service said it would in future seek to charge offenders caught with a corrosive substance with possession of an offensive weapon. The crime carries a potential four year jail term.

Prosecutors will be told to bring even tougher charges – carrying a maximum life sentence – against those who throw acid, even if no harm is caused to the intended victim.

It said the move was a response to public concern about a spate of horrific attacks and a recognition of the life-changing consequences that can be inflicted by acid and similar substances.

The announcement came as details were released of the most recent acid conviction in which a burglar admitted inflicting 24 per cent burns on a 69-year-old woman by spraying corrosive liquid on her after breaking into her home in Ilford.

The man also threatened a 90-year-old woman with acid during another break-in and used corrosive substances in other attacks. He will be sentenced at Wood Green Crown Court next month.

Unveiling the new crackdown today, Alison Saunders, the Director of Public Prosecutions, said she was updating her guidance to prosecutors to ensure that the courts had the “widest possible sentencing power” to deal with acid offenders.

Burglar sprayed pensioner in terrifying attack

A burglar who left a female pensioner with 24 per cent burns after spraying her with acid during a break-in has been convicted at a London court.

Gerard Whelan, 45, from Paddington, admitted causing grievous bodily harm with intent after squeezing acid from a bottle onto the 69-year-old woman during a night-time burglary at her home in Ilford in July last year.

She had to have skin grafts and other surgery and has been left with permanent scars to her arms, legs and face. The substance used to inflict her injuries had the same strength as sulphuric acid.

Whelan was also convicted of a series of other offences involving acid. One was another burglary in December during which he threatened a 90-year-old with a screwdriver and sprayed acid on a wall before demanding money.He also caused serious injuries by squeezing acid onto another woman during a break-in in Ilford the day before.

He had previously woken her up and threatened her by holding a screwdriver over her as she lay in her bed saying: “If you don’t be quiet I will kill you.”

He took a bangle and rings from her hand and arm and used acid on her when she tried to escape.

Five other people, three men and two women, were also attacked with acid during separate robberies carried out by Whelan. He also carried out other assaults using a screwdriver during his crime spree. He will be sentenced in September at Wood Green Crown Court.

Another aim was to deter those who carried acid instead of a knife or other weapon in the mistaken belief that they could escape criminal sanctions.

“The point is that if you can’t just expect to carry acid around without an excuse. It counts as an offensive weapon just as much as a knife or a screwdriver could be,” Ms Saunders told the Evening Standard.

“We are very conscious of the impact of this crime and how there has been a recent spate of it so we are very keen to make sure that we do prosecute it and the court has the right sentencing powers.

Muslims have their homelands. It’s not Britain. They bring their violent nature to every country that will allow them residence.

Ban Muslims, not just acid.