Superman Protects Illegals from Armed White Supremacist in Latest Comic Book

Superman = Jewperman now.

It’s too bad fucking social justice warrior Superman wasn’t there to protect the fucking thousands of Americans killed by fucking illegal aliens.

Hey, Superman, you fucking piece of shit! Where were you when Jamiel was murdered! And what about Kate Steinle, you moron!

Superman is an illegal alien. Deport him back to Krypton or wherever the hell he came from.

Hollywood Reporter

The moment in the book released Wednesday comes a week after President Trump ended DACA.

Perhaps it is just a coincidence, but perhaps not.

In the recent issue of Action Comics #987, “The Oz Effect,” released Wednesday, Superman arrives in the nick of time to protect a group of undocumented immigrants from a white man sporting an American flag bandanna, wielding a machine gun, who is going to shoot them for taking his job.

Superman blocks the bullets before they hit the terrified people.

“Stop this!” Superman orders the gunman.

“Why?!” he responds. “They ruined me! Stole from me!”

Grabbing the gunman by the collar and pulling him in close, Superman says, “The only person responsible for the blackness smothering your soul — is you!”

Police arrive, and Superman hands over the gunman and tells officers to make sure the victims are “safe and cared for.” An officer responds, “Anything you say, Superman!”

The moment comes just one week after President Donald Trump made the controversial announcement that he was ending the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy put in place by former President Barack Obama. He then gave Congress a window to save the program.

Still, the decision was decried by politicians, civil groups and celebrities alike. Nearly 800,000 individuals, known as Dreamers, have received protection to stay in the country through the program.

In addition to the DACA announcement, Trump was also slammed for comments he made just a few weeks prior when he appeared to be defending a group of white nationalists holding a rally in Charlottesville, Va., at which one protester to the rally was killed and numerous others injured.

Action Comics #987 is by Dan Jurgens, Viktor Bogdanovic, Jonathan Glapion, Jay Leisten and Mike Spicer.

Hollywood and almost the entire entertainment industry needs to be destroyed. We can’t escape their moronic, shallow virtue signaling. Meanwhile, real people die because of Hollywood.

Winning! Border Control Legislation “Kate’s Law” Passes House


One of President Donald Trump’s big campaign issues came to fruition today when the House passed Kate’s Law. The last remaining obstacle is the Senate. Democrats are on notice: Block Kate’s Law and you’re going into early retirement.

Fox News

House Republicans took action Thursday to crack down on illegal immigrants and the cities that shelter them.

One bill passed by the House would deny federal grants to sanctuary cities and another, Kate’s Law, would increase the penalties for deported aliens who try to return to the United States.

Kate’s Law, which would increase the penalties for deported aliens who try to return to the United States and caught, passed with a vote of 257 to 157, with one Republican voting no and 24 Democrats voting yes.

Kate’s Law is named for Kate Steinle, a San Francisco woman killed by an illegal immigrant who was in the U.S. despite multiple deportations. The two-year anniversary of her death is on Saturday.

President Trump called the bill’s passage “good news” in a tweet, adding “House just passed #KatesLaw. Hopefully Senate will follow.”

“He should not have been here, and she should not have died,” House Speaker Paul Ryan said Thursday, in a final push for Kate’s Law, an earlier version of which was blocked in the Senate last year.

“Our job here is to make sure that those professionals have the tools that they need and the resources that they need to carry out their work and to protect our communities. That is what these measures are all about,” added Ryan.

The other bill, which would deny federal grants to sanctuary cities, passed with a vote of 228-195 with 3 Democrats voting yes and 7 Republicans voting no.

The brutal murder of Steinle catapulted the issue of illegal criminal aliens into the national spotlight. Alleged shooter Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez had been deported five times and had seven felony convictions.

On Wednesday, President Trump highlighted other cases during a White House meeting with more than a dozen families of people who had been victimized by illegal immigrants, including Jamiel Shaw Sr.

Shaw’s 17-year-old son Jamiel was shot and killed by an illegal immigrant in California in March 2008..

“He was living the dream,” Shaw said during the meeting. “That was squashed out.”

The second measure, “No Sanctuary for Criminals Act,” would cut federal grants to states and “sanctuary cities” that refuse to cooperate with law enforcement carrying out immigration enforcement activities.

“The word ‘sanctuary’ calls to mind someplace safe, but too often for families and victims affected by illegal immigrant crime, sanctuary cities are anything but safe,” Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly asserted in the pre-vote press conference.

“It is beyond my comprehension why federal state and local officials … would actively discourage or outright prevent law enforcement agencies from upholding the laws of the United States,” he added.

While gaining support in the Senate for similar legislation will be a tough road, Trump called for Congress to act quickly.

Trump called on the House and the Senate to “to honor grieving American families” by approving a “package of truly key immigration enforcement bills” so that he could sign them into law.

“I promise you, it will be done quickly. You don’t have to wait the mandatory period. It will be very quick,” promised Trump.

Earlier on Wednesday, Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director Thomas D. Homan and U.S. Attorney for Utah John W. Huber made their case for the bills during the White House press briefing.

Huber said 40 percent of Utah’s current felony caseload involves criminal alien prosecutions and the number is increasing.

The bills, Huber asserted, would “advance the ball for law enforcement in keeping our communities safe” and “would give officers and prosecutors more tools to protect the public.

Many immigration rights groups have characterized efforts to crack down on sanctuary cities as “anti-immigrant,” but Attorney General Jeff Sessions says it is not sound policy to allow sanctuary cities to flout federal immigration laws.

According to Homan, ICE already has arrested nearly 66,000 individuals this year that were either known or suspected to be in the country illegally. Of those arrested, 48,000 were convicted criminal aliens.

“The practices of these jurisdictions are not only contrary to sound policy; they’re contrary to the law enforcement cooperation that is carried out every day in our country and is essential to public safety,” Sessions wrote in a Fox News op-ed backing the bills.

House Passes “Donald Trump Act” Which Punishes Sanctuary Cities for Not Following the Law

donald-trump-winning-gop smile grin

El Presidente Obama will veto any law that inteferes with the mass migration of Mexicans and Central Americans into the U.S. Who cares about a few dead bodies of innocent victims when millions of votes are at stake for the Democrats.

House Republicans passed legislation on Thursday that would deny federal funds to sanctuary cities.

The bill, passed 241-179, would withhold certain federal law enforcement grants to cities that have policies designed to shelter illegal immigrants from deportation.

Sanctuary cities have come under heavy scrutiny in the wake of Kathryn Steinle’s death on July 1 in San Francisco. Authorities charged Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez with her killing. Lopez-Sanchez, who is in the U.S. illegally, has a history of felony convictions and has been deported five times.

Critics of the sanctuary laws say such policies encourage people to immigrate to the U.S. illegally at the expense of citizens.

“A refuge for whom? A sanctuary for whom?” Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) said. “A sanctuary for Kate Steinle? Or a refuge for a convicted felon with a 25-year-long criminal history?”

Democrats accused House Republicans of bringing up the bill in part because of real estate mogul and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s focus on illegal immigration and sanctuary cities; they dubbed the bill the “Donald Trump Act.”

“Just a few weeks into his campaign and Donald Trump has a bill on the floor of the House. That is better than some of the senators he’s running against.” Rep. Luis Gutiérrez (D-Ill.) said mockingly.

Republicans denied that Trump had any influence on their decision to bring up the legislation.

“This is a valid concern that we’re voting on today,” said Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-N.J.), who has often broken with his party on immigration in the past and said he finds Trump’s comments offensive. “I’m not going to let Donald Trump dictate my vote.”

trump frog border2

Read more at The Hill.

Video: Conservative Black Teen C. J. Pearson Mocks Obama and Muslim Clock Bomb Student

This is not the first time C. J. Pearson’s sensible videos have been featured on this site. Like Pastor Manning, Walter Williams, and several other black people, he speaks the truth. That earns him a place at the table on this site.

Awesome comment on youtube:

Good job, pal! “The father of a righteous son will rejoice greatly, and one who fathers a wise son will delight in him. ” Proverbs 23:24

C. J. should be invited to the White House in 2017. By President Trump.

Brother of Kate Steinle, SF Woman Murdered by Illegal Mexican, Supports Open Borders, Trashes Donald Trump (Video)


All of us, including Donald Trump, have a right to discuss the murder of Kate Steinle by illegal Mexican Francisco Sanchez. It’s not about just the family of the victim, but about preventing future murders of this type. Many people do not support illegal migrants such as Francisco Sanchez being in the country. We have a right and a duty to speak in order to prevent our loved ones from becoming victims.

In the CNN video below watch CNN’s faggy anchor Anderson Pooper ask Miss Steinle’s brother leading questions. CNN got what it wanted–rather harsh criticism of Donald Trump, who has made the issue of illegal migrant criminals in the U.S. a campaign issue.

Imbecilic Black Woman Co-Host of The View: Donald Trump Had Kathryn Steinle Murdered to Boost His Poll Numbers

raven symone

No white person should waste his or her time watching the idiotic TV show The View. We have more important things to do than listen to the babblings of Z-list celebrities who unfortunately aren’t playing with a full deck.


Amidst the cackling – and folks, it’s nothing but cackling – of co-hosts on The View, one of them had an interesting theory anout who killed Kathryn Steinle: It was Donald Trump.

On the mysteriously popular show, former child star (think the littlest girl on The Cosby Show) Raven-Symone thinks Steinle was killed as part of a vast conspiracy theory to increase Trump’s popularity.

Raven-Symone (yes, one name with a hyphen, and there’s an accent mark in there somewhere, but I ain’t doing it) said that it was simply too convenient that an innocent woman was murdered in a Sanctuary City by an illegal alien right as Trump was criticizing America’s immigration policy.

RAVEN-SYMONE: Doesn’t anyone find it interesting that this happened as soon as Trump started to talk about this [illegal immigration and crime]? He [Sanchez] randomly found a gun from a federal agent?

WALLACE [sarcastic]: I’m pretty sure the criminal wasn’t watching CNN.

RAVEN-SYMONE: No, but look at the news. They reported it. They should have been showing more of these beforehand, for instance. I just feel it’s very interesting. And how do you feel about Trump talking about Hillary, about how if she’s president, there’s going to be just a flood of murders and a flood of things going on. I think he’s very wrong in saying that.

This is, of course, stupidity of the highest order, but millions and millions of lonely housewives watch this crap, and at least some of them will actually believe this.


Kate Steinle Murder: Lawsuit Against San Francisco Sanctuary City Policy Likely to Fail


Many people are helpfully suggesting to Kate Steinle’s family that they sue San Francisco over it’s Sanctuary City policy, a policy that resulted in their lovely young daughter being murdered by an illegal immigrant from Mexico.

The problems are two foldfold. A large cash down payment will be required to engage a lawyer to take the case. And the lawsuit is likely to be thrown out of court.

Excerpt from Fox News

Kathryn “Kate” Steinle was shot dead on July 1, allegedly by Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, a Mexican felon who was in the U.S. illegally. Lopez-Sanchez would have been deported but for the fact that San Francisco is a “sanctuary city,” which is why officials there chose to release him and ignore an ICE detainer. This effectively put him back on the street. And yet, if Steinle’s family tries to sue the city for this travesty, it may be thrown out of court.

Most people who have not been involved with the legal system like I have do not understand how costly lawsuits are and how most of them are thrown out of court before ever going to trial.

Does anyone seriously think that a liberal judge would validate the idea that Sanctuary Cities (there are 200 of them in the USSA) can be successfully sued for crimes committed by illegals drawn to those cities. The courts would be flooded with litigation.

The law today is a clusterfreak of politics and political correctness. How can a Sanctuary City policy possibly be legal? Well, if it’s not legal, therein lies the basis for a successful lawsuit.

There is good reason to suspect that Steinle’s family will have an uphill climb in any lawsuit it may pursue. In January of 2011, a California appeals court upheld the dismissal of a similar suit. In that case, Anthony Bologna and his two sons were murdered by Edwin Ramos, a Salvadoran. Bologna’s wife sued the city of San Francisco over the sanctuary policy in place at the time, and the appeals court unanimously agreed that the case did not fall under a legal exception allowing such lawsuits against governmental entities. The court ruled that none of the laws cited in the lawsuit were specifically aimed at preventing violent crimes by illegal immigrants. Instead, the court ruled, they were intended to combat the drug trade and to curb illegal immigration.

However, there are other ways for the Steinle family to pursue their case against San Francisco. First of all, less than a year after the Bologna family’s case was dismissed, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Arizona v U.S. that the states can’t overstep the federal government’s immigration enforcement authority. While many felt that ruling took away Arizona’s ability to combat illegal immigration, it also may have opened the door for the Steinles. If, as the court ruled, only the federal government has the power in the area of immigration, then any sanctuary city or state law is unconstitutional. This alone should provide the basis for a lawsuit against the city of San Francisco.

I hope that Kate’s family sues and wins, while ending the nonsensical idea of the Sanctuary City, which is nothing but cheap pandering to Mexicans. It’s an idea that came from the fertile minds of leftists bent on destroying the USA and race replacing whites with Mexicans.

Until the children of judges, bankers, and other power elites begin to die at the hands of illegals, I’m not hopeful that anything meaningful is going to be done.