Former DNC Chair Brazile Considered Replacing Crooked Hillary with Creepy Veep Joe Biden

Donna Brazile was working as an analyst for CNN when she gave Hillary Clinton the CNN questions before one of the presidential debates.

Her history with the Clintons goes back to Arkansas. She was a crony. When Debbie Wasserman-Schultz was pressured out of the DNC leadership position it was natural for the Clinton machine to install Brazile in that position.

Now she’s getting hammered by the media and Twitter for telling at least some of the truth about Crooked Hillary in her new book. There are a significant number of Clinton worshipers who believe their Goddess Hillary can do no wrong.

Well, she did one thing wrong. She lost.

Excerpt from Washington Post via MSN

Former Democratic National Committee head Donna Brazile writes in a new book that she seriously contemplated replacing Hillary Clinton as the party’s 2016 presidential nominee with then-Vice President Biden in the aftermath of Clinton’s fainting spell, in part because Clinton’s campaign was “anemic” and had taken on “the odor of failure.”

In an explosive new memoir, Brazile details widespread dysfunction and dissension throughout the Democratic Party, including secret deliberations over using her powers as interim DNC chair to initiate the process of removing Clinton and running mate Sen. Tim Kaine (Va.) from the ticket after Clinton’s Sept. 11, 2016, collapse in New York City.

DONNA BRAZILE. FORMER CLINTON CRONY.

Brazile writes that she considered a dozen combinations to replace the nominees and settled on Biden and Sen. Cory Booker (N.J.), the duo she felt most certain would win over enough working-class voters to defeat Republican Donald Trump. But then, she writes, “I thought of Hillary, and all the women in the country who were so proud of and excited about her. I could not do this to them.”

Brazile paints a scathing portrait of Clinton as a well-intentioned, historic candidate whose campaign was badly mismanaged, took minority constituencies for granted and made blunders with “stiff” and “stupid” messages. The campaign was so lacking in passion for the candidate, she writes, that its New York headquarters felt like a sterile hospital ward where “someone had died.”

Brazile alleges that Clinton’s top aides routinely disrespected her and put the DNC on a “starvation diet,” depriving it of funding for voter turnout operations.

As one of her party’s most prominent black strategists, Brazile also recounts fiery disagreements with Clinton’s staffers — including a conference call in which she told three senior campaign officials, Charlie Baker, Marlon Marshall and Dennis Cheng, that she was being treated like a slave.

“I’m not Patsey the slave,” Brazile recalls telling them, a reference to the character played by Lupita Nyong’o in the film, “12 Years a Slave.” “Y’all keep whipping me and whipping me and you never give me any money or any way to do my damn job. I am not going to be your whipping girl!”

Brazile’s book, titled “Hacks: The Inside Story of the Break-ins and Breakdowns that Put Donald Trump in the White House,” will be released Tuesday by Hachette Books. A copy of the 288-page book was obtained in advance by The Washington Post.

Perhaps not since George Stephanopoulos wrote “All Too Human,” a 1999 memoir of his years working for former president Bill Clinton, has a political strategist penned such a blistering tell-all.

In it, Brazile reveals how fissures of race, gender and age tore at the heart of the operation — even as Clinton was campaigning on a message of inclusiveness and trying to assemble a rainbow coalition under the banner of “Stronger Together.”

A veteran operative and television pundit who had long served as DNC’s vice chair, Brazile abruptly and, she writes, reluctantly took over in July 2016 for chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz. The Florida congresswoman was ousted from the DNC on the eve of the party convention after WikiLeaks released stolen emails among her and her advisers that showed favoritism for Clinton during the competitive primaries. Brazile describes her mounting anxiety about Russia’s theft of emails and other data from DNC servers, the slow process of discovering the full extent of the cyberattacks and the personal fallout. She likens the feeling to having rats in your basement: “You take measures to get rid of them, but knowing they are there, or have been there, means you never feel truly at peace.”

Brazile writes that she was haunted by the still-unsolved murder of DNC data staffer Seth Rich and feared for her own life, shutting the blinds to her office window so snipers could not see her and installing surveillance cameras at her home. She wonders whether Russians had placed a listening device in plants in the DNC executive suite.

The contradiction in the last paragraph revolves around the official story that Seth Rich was murdered in a robbery gone bad. It sounds like Brazile knows more than she’s letting on because why would she fear for her own life if he was killed randomly.

Hillary Clinton Turns 70 Tomorrow: Assange Sends His Greetings

Alright, everyone, take note.

Tomorrow is Hillary Clinton’s birthday. Be sure to Tweet her your greetings.

Wouldn’t it be nice if she gets a special birthday present. Bracelets will do nicely.

Sputnik News

On October 24, WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange took to Twitter to wish Hillary Clinton a happy birthday, on the eve of her 70th – by reminding the candidate of her electoral failure.

Assange retweeted a self-congratulatory post by Clinton from October 26 in 2016, where the presidential hopeful not only wished herself a happy birthday, but referred to herself as “this future president.”

Less than a month later, Donald Trump won the election, defeating Clinton with 56 percent of Electoral College votes.

Assange and Clinton have long been vociferous foes, and in her published account of the 2016 presidential race, What Happened, the former first lady called him “a hypocrite who deserves to be held accountable for his actions,” and suggested he was a tool of Russian intelligence.

“He claims to be a champion of transparency, but for many years, he’s been helpful to the most repressive and least transparent autocrats in the world,” Clinton wrote.

Despite Clinton’s claims of Russian meddling assisting Trump’s victory, in October, it was revealed as secretary of state Clinton may have approved a controversial deal that made Russian atomic energy agency Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers, in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation from Canadian mining industry leaders involved in the deal.

Clinton has denied the allegations.

Assange Throws Deadman’s Switch as Hillary Clinton Claims Wikileaks a ‘subsidiary of Russian intelligence’ and Assange does ‘bidding of dictator’

About the same time that Julian Assange was responding to Hillary Clinton’s ridiculous accusations against him and Wikileaks, he Tweeted the deadman’s switch you see in the above Tweet. No one knows what it means.

The story that the media is picking up is Hillary’s claim that Wikileaks is a Russian operation that was out to get her in 2016.

Hillary Clinton is seriously mentally ill, fixated on blaming the world for her letting the presidency slip through her grasp.

The Telegraph

illary Clinton lashed out at Julian Assange on Monday, accusing WikiLeaks of being a “subsidiary of Russian intelligence” while its founder did “the bidding of a dictator”.

The former Democratic presidential nominee said the whistle-blowing website worked with Russia to deflect attention away from an infamous tape of Donald Trump bragging about groping women in the run-up to the US election.

The former secretary of state’s devastating election loss to Mr Trump remains raw and she has blamed a number of factors for her election defeat as she promotes her book What Happened.

In an interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation on Monday, she attacked Mr Assange for his alleged role in damaging her candidacy.

“Assange has become a kind of nihilistic opportunist who does the bidding of a dictator,” she said, referring to Russian president Vladimir Putin.

“WikiLeaks is unfortunately now practically a fully-owned subsidiary of Russian intelligence.”

Mr Assange hit back at Mrs Clinton’s “constant lying” on Twitter.

“There’s something wrong with Hillary Clinton,” he said. “It is not just her constant lying. It is not just that she throws off menacing glares and seethes thwarted entitlement. Watch closely. Something much darker rides along with it. A cold creepiness rarely seen.”

Assange also responded to Crooked Hillary with this Tweet, which shows Obama refuting Hillary’s claims of Russian involvement with Wikileaks:

Deep State Pressure Causes Harvard to Rescind Chelsea Manning’s Visiting Fellow Invitation

CHELSEA MANNING. STILL A DUDE NO MATTER THE HAIR AND MAKEUP.

Chelsea Manning (the former Bradley Manning): A pox upon her.

Harvard University: A pox upon this anti-white, Deep State institution.

The Deep State: A pox upon the un-American (((neocon))) warmongers.

There are no good guys in this story. Chelsea Manning comes the closest to being good because when she was a he, he leaked information to Wikileaks that exposed the Deep State’s lies and treason.

NBC News

The dean of Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government said the college was withdrawing its invitation for Chelsea Manning to be a visiting fellow and apologized for extending the offer, which prompted a former CIA director and the current one to distance themselves from the university.

Former CIA Acting Director Michael Morell earlier Thursday announced his resignation as a senior fellow at Harvard over its hiring of Manning. Mike Pompeo, the agency’s current director, also canceled a speaking engagement there Thursday night.

“I now think that designating Chelsea Manning as a visiting fellow was a mistake, for which I accept responsibility,” Kennedy School Dean Douglas W. Elmendorf said in a statement posted on the university’s website early Friday. “I still think that having her speak in the Forum and talk with students is consistent with our longstanding approach, which puts great emphasis on the value of hearing from a diverse collection of people.

“But I see more clearly now that many people view a Visiting Fellow title as an honorific, so we should weigh that consideration when offering invitations,” Elmendorf added.

Morell said in a letter to Elmendorf that he cannot associate himself with an organization “that honors a convicted felon and leaker of classified information.”

“Ms. Manning was found guilty of 17 serious crimes, including six counts of espionage, for leaking hundreds of thousands of classified documents to Wikileaks, an entity that CIA Director Mike Pompeo says operates like an adversarial foreign intelligence service,” Morell wrote.

Pompeo said in a separate letter to Harvard on Thursday that he backed Morell’s decision, adding that he was withdrawing from a Harvard public forum later Thursday night.

“While I have served my country as a soldier in the United States Army and will continue to defend Ms. Manning’s right to offer a defense of why she chose this path, I believe it is shameful for Harvard to place its stamp of approval upon her treasonous actions,” Pompeo wrote.

Like Pompeo, Morell stressed that he didn’t take issue with Manning’s gender identity.

“But it is my right, indeed my duty, to argue that the School’s decision is wholly inappropriate and to protest it by resigning from the Kennedy School,” he wrote.

Elmendorf disputed the notion that Harvard’s selection of the visiting fellows were endorsements of their views or actions. But he said it was clear others view the positions that way.

Manning, a former Army intelligence analyst, was convicted of leaking a trove of military intelligence records and spent seven years in prison before President Barack Obama commuted her sentence in January.

She is appealing her conviction. Manning’s lawyer handling the appeal, Nancy Hollander, disputed Morell’s claims that Manning’s leak put the nation in danger.

Even if you believe that Bradley Manning caused some harm to the United States, his actions are a trifle compared to the harm done by Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and so forth.

Although I have no interest in hearing him/her speak, others may find value in his words. The fact that the Deep State is trying to silence him puts me on his side.

Link to Chelsea Manning’s Wikipedia

Trump Jr. Follows Julian Assange, Sparks Media Panic That A Presidential Pardon Is In The Works

Assange must have the goods on Hillary, Obama, and all the other sorry excuses for human beings that made up the Obama administration.

Let’s get that information out there to the public. Then millions of us march to Washington to demand that the traitors receive their day in court.

Zerohedge

Earlier this week we noted that Representative Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) had a three hour meeting with Julian Assange at the Ecuadorian embassy in London to discuss ‘helpful’ information which Assange purported would prove that Russia was not his source for the DNC / Podesta leaks last year.

Not surprisingly, the mainstream media chose not to focus on that angle and decided instead to focus all of their efforts on branding Rohrabacher as a Russian spy. That said, here is how Rohrabacher recounted the details of the meeting with Assange to The Hill:

“Our three-hour meeting covered a wide array of issues, including the WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC emails during last year’s presidential election,” Rohrabacher said, “Julian emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.”

Pressed for more detail on the source of the documents, Rohrabacher said he had information to share privately with President Donald Trump.

“Julian also indicated that he is open to further discussions regarding specific information about the DNC email incident that is currently unknown to the public,” he added.

Now, the following tweet from an account that tracks the every move of the Trump family has sparked new speculation that a Presidential pardon of Julian Assange may be in the works…something that is undoubtedly not all that palatable to our friends at CNN and MSNBC.

Of course, if Assange really has concrete evidence that his source is anyone other than a Kremlin-connected official then you would think that information might be deemed useful to Special Counsel Mueller since it’s basically the only reason his investigation exists in the first place.

Moreover, one would think that an immunity deal for Assange in return for such information would also be reasonable…rendering a presidential pardon moot. Certainly, the majority of Hillary’s staff was granted immunity deals for far less useful information…

Meanwhile, we would note that Jr. is also a long-time follower of @wikileaks so that must necessarily mean that he coordinated the DNC / Podesta hacks directly with them. Combine that with the fact that we’re almost certain that parsing through the nearly 1,200 accounts that Jr. follows would also reveal at least a couple of Russian sounding names and we’re pretty sure that Mueller’s grand jury has all they need for an indictment.

Trump is being set up to be impeached soon. Getting Assange on board with the truth can only delay or prevent the Deep State from achieving that goal. The psy op that is being perpetrated is unlike anything seen before. When Assange is pardoned, the headines will say something like, “Trump Pardons Rapist.”

CNN crosses line to extortion! Big trouble as network blackmails teen who posted Trump WWE video

If CNN doesn’t go under now, what’s it going to take? These imbeciles are allegedly guilty of extortion, bullying a 15 year old boy who enjoyed making memes that were slightly politically incorrect into apologizing and getting off the Internet.

Last night, as the story broke, I posted this story on how the Redditor who created the Trump wrestling meme apologized.

Overnight (it’s 6:48 A.M. as I’m writing), the Twitter hashtag #CNNBlackmail exploded with thousands of Tweets condemning CNN for forcing the Redditor to apologize under threat of having his real identity revealed.

It turns out that CNN was blackmailing a 15 year old kid.

Julian Assange and a host of Twitter users have made it clear that the mission now is to utterly and totally destroy CNN.

Normally, President Trump would be Tweeting up a storm over this good news, but one of his latest Tweets says he’s getting ready to head for Poland and won’t be back until Saturday.

bizpacreview.com

The fake-news fascists at CNN are in big trouble now. Yuuuuge.

The hashtag “CNN Blackmail” is the No. 1 trending topic on Twitter after CNN bragged about threatening to dox a 15-year-old child for creating the comical WWE meme that showed President Trump body-slamming a CNN logo.

CNN boasted that it had tracked down and basically bullied a Reddit user called HanAssholeSolo after he took credit for the video online. The Redditer is a 15-year-old boy, according to multiple Twitter users.

CNN claimed HanAssholeSolo apologized to them for creating the jokey WWE meme and deleted all his posts that mocked the humorless cable news network.

CNN then bragged about suppressing the teen’s Constitutionally-guaranteed free speech rights on the Fourth of July by threatening to dox him to the world:

CNN is not publishing “HanA**holeSolo’s” name because he is a private citizen who has issued an extensive statement of apology, showed his remorse by saying he has taken down all his offending posts, and because he said he is not going to repeat this ugly behavior on social media again.

In addition, he said his statement could serve as an example to others not to do the same. CNN reserves the right to publish his identity should any of that change.

CNN threw a major hissy-fit after President Trump tweeted this meme from 2007 that was modified to show him body-slamming a CORPORATE LOGO OF CNN.

While the appropriateness of President Trump’s tweet was hotly debated by both liberals and conservatives, CNN’s bullying of a teenager was widely condemned by all sides.

German Lopez, a reporter for liberal website Vox, was absolutely disgusted and called CNN’s cyberbullying unethical. “This is basically ‘don’t post stuff we don’t like or we’ll dox you.’ Extremely unethical,” Lopez tweeted.

Conservative author Ben Shapiro — an attorney who graduated from Harvard Law school — agreed.

“That’s essentially blackmail. That’s CNN stating that it will out the guy if he dares to defy their political perspective or offends them sufficiently,” Shapiro wrote. “The whole story is frightening, and obviously an attempt to both nail Trump and discourage people from smacking CNN.”

Republican Congressman Scott Taylor accused CNN of extortion. “Pretty sure a line is crossed here,” he wrote on Twitter.

The backlash against CNN was volcanic in its condemnation of a multi-billion-dollar news network threatening and scaring a 15-year-old child because they want him to stop making comical memes that hurt their wittle feelings.

The viral hashtag “CNN Blackmail” has been trending overnight on Twitter as users expressed their outrage that a so-called journalistic outfit threatened a child’s free-speech rights on the birthday of the United States of America.

Wikileaks Declares War on The Intercept for Turning in Top Secret Leaker Reality Winner to FBI, Offers $10,000 Bounty

ARRESTED LEAKER REALITY WINNER AND HER CAT.

Setting aside for future posts whether the entire (((Reality Winner))) affair is a psyop, Julian Assange and Wikileaks have taken over center stage from the hipster Trump-hating, tatted weirdo with a Top Secret security clearance arrested for mishandling classified material.

Specifically, Assange is on the warpath against the reporter who contacted the FBI when he or she received a Top Secret document in the mail.

Sputnik News

WikiLeaks issued on Tuesday a $10,000 reward for information about a person, who had disclosed identity of reported National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower Reality Leigh Winner, accused by the US authorities of leaking classified information to a media outlet.

Winner, arrested on June 3, is accused of leaking information regarding alleged Russian hacking activities during 2016 US presidential campaign.

Earlier on Tuesday, the US Department of Justice said in a statement that Winner was a contractor with Pluribus International Corporation that held a Top Secret security clearance and was employed at the US government agency facility since February. According to the statement, Winner pilfered the classified intelligence reporting, which contained classified national defense information from an intelligence community agency and mailed it to a unnamed media outlet.

According to WikiLeaks, the leaked document was mailed to The Intercept media outlet, which published on Monday the NSA paper detailing “months-long Russian intelligence cyber effort against elements of the US election and voting infrastructure.”

Assange explained his decision to offer a reward to The Daily Beast

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange told The Daily Beast he holds reporters—not just the Trump administration—responsible for the arrest of a U.S. intelligence contractor charged with leaking classified information.

On Monday, the Justice Department said Reality Winner, a 25-year-old National Security Agency contractor, sent top secret information to a news outlet. The announcement came shortly after The Intercept published a series of NSA documents claiming that Russian hackers targeted a voting-software supplier and local election officials just prior to Election Day.

According to the affidavit, reporters for the unnamed news organization provided a copy of the printed NSA report to the agency in order to seek comment. The NSA claimed six people had printed out the report including Winner, who the agency said had been in contact with an unnamed news outlet.

“If the FBI affidavit is accurate the reporter concerned must be named, shamed and fired by whomever they work for to maintain industry standards,” Assange said via Twitter direct message through the WikiLeaks account on Tuesday.

“Source burning reporters are a menace,” he said. “They chill trust in all journalists which impedes public understanding.”

WikiLeaks offered a $10,000 reward for information “leading to the public exposure & termination” of the reporter.

“It seems likely that the FBI affidavit refers to The Intercept, but not certain, hence we say ‘suspected Intercept reporter,’ said Assange. “But whomever this reporter was they are a menace not only to sources but to all journalists by decreasing the trust between sources and journalist and ultimately the public. Democracy dies in darkness.”

Assange’s defense of leaking NSA documents that accuse Russia of interfering in the U.S. election is in contrast to his agreement last year that he was “1,000 percent” confident Russia did not give WikiLeaks hacked Democratic National Committee emails. While Assange did not comment on the content of the leaks, he defended the alleged leaker Monday night.

Assange is not a god. He is a sometime ally. The DNC emails published by Wikileaks (also known as the Podesta emails) did not involve national security. The Snowden material published by Wikileaks showed a government, a (((Deep State))) that was committing treason against its own citizens.

It’s entirely possible to say that you supported Wikileaks before, but not this time, and be a rational human being.

The MSM, which condemned Wikileaks before is now supporting Assange because they want constant leaks to be able to destroy the Trump presidency.

By the way, if you investigate the leaked material, it’s nothing but unsupported speculation by the intel community that Russia did successfully hack the U.S. election.