Nonwhite Judge Blocks Trump’s Latest Travel Ban

JUDGE DERRICK WATSON. BLOCKED EARLIER TRAVEL BAN TOO.

Wikipedia tells us that Judge Derrick Watson, who is determined to prevent any travel ban at all from ever taking place for any reason, is an Obama appointee. He is a Native Hawaiian.

He’s also not surprisingly allegedly received threats for his unconcern with public safety.

So, back goes the Attorney General’s office to the Supreme Court, which really needs to excoriate this little Hawaiian worn.

ABC News

A federal judge in Hawaii blocked most of President Donald Trump’s latest travel ban Tuesday, just hours before it was set to take effect, saying the revised order “suffers from precisely the same maladies as its predecessor.”

It was the third set of travel restrictions issued by the president to be thwarted, in whole or in part, by the courts.

U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson issued the ruling after the ban on a set of mostly Muslim countries was challenged by the state of Hawaii, which warned that the restrictions would separate families and undermine the recruiting of diverse college students.

White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders called the ruling “dangerously flawed” and said it “undercuts the president’s efforts to keep the American people safe.” The Justice Department said it will quickly appeal.

At issue was a ban, announced in September and set to go into effect early Wednesday, on travelers from Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria and Yemen, along with some Venezuelan government officials and their families.

The Trump administration said the ban was based on an assessment of each country’s security situation and willingness to share information with the U.S.

Watson, appointed to the bench by President Barack Obama, said the new restrictions ignore a federal appeals court ruling against Trump’s previous ban.

The latest version “plainly discriminates based on nationality in the manner that the 9th Circuit has found antithetical to … the founding principles of this nation,” Watson wrote.

The judge’s ruling applies only to the six Muslim-majority countries on the list. It does not affect the restrictions against North Korea or Venezuela, because Hawaii did not ask for that.

“This is the third time Hawaii has gone to court to stop President Trump from issuing a travel ban that discriminates against people based on their nation of origin or religion,” Hawaii Attorney General Doug Chin said in a statement. “Today is another victory for the rule of law.”

Hawaii argued the updated ban was a continuation of Trump’s campaign call for a ban on Muslims, despite the addition of two countries without a Muslim majority.

Watson noted that Hawaii had argued Trump did not back down from that call, listing in the ruling a series of June tweets “in which (Trump) complained about how the Justice Department had submitted a ‘watered down, politically correct version’ to the Supreme Court.”

Other courts that weighed the travel ban have cited Trump’s comments about banning Muslims, including the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Virginia and a federal judge in Maryland. Watson also referred to a Trump campaign statement in his previous ruling.

His Tuesday ruling said the new ban, like its predecessor, fails to show that nationality alone makes a person a greater security risk to the U.S.

“The categorical restrictions on entire populations of men, women and children, based upon nationality, are a poor fit for the issues regarding the sharing of ‘public-safety and terrorism-related information’ that the president identifies,” Watson wrote.

He said the ban is inconsistent in the way some countries are included or left out. For example, Iraq failed to meet the security benchmark but was omitted from the ban. Somalia met the information-sharing benchmark but was included.

Watson found fault with what sorts of visitors are barred. For instance, all tourists and business travelers from Libya are excluded from the U.S., but student visitors were allowed.

The judge said he would set an expedited hearing to determine whether the temporary restraining order blocking the ban should be extended. It comes as other courts weigh challenges to the ban.

In Maryland, the American Civil Liberties Union and other groups are seeking to block the visa and entry restrictions. Washington state, Massachusetts, California, Oregon, New York and Maryland are challenging the order in front of the same federal judge in Seattle who struck down Trump’s initial ban in January.

That ban — aimed mostly at Muslim-majority countries — led to chaos and confusion at airports nationwide and triggered several lawsuits, including one from Hawaii.

When Trump revised the ban, Hawaii challenged that version, too, and Watson agreed it discriminated on the basis of nationality and religion. A subsequent U.S. Supreme Court ruling allowed the administration to partially reinstate restrictions against Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen and against all refugees.

Hawaii then successfully challenged the government’s definition of which relatives of people already living in the U.S. would be allowed into the country, and Watson ordered the list expanded.

Nonwhites shouldn’t be judges except for their own peoples. This one wants to create chaos, justifying it with that liberal catchall, “inclusion.”

Appeals Court Ruling Endangers Public Safety by Again Blocking Trump Travel Ban

DEAD KIDS IN MANCHESTER AND NOW THIS COURT RULING. OF COURSE HE’S HAPPY.

Unbelievable!

The 4th circuit federal appeals court used the “Trump made racist comments during the campaign” justification for putting millions of Americans in danger.

The rule of law and many lives have been sacrificed today on the altar of political correctness.

NBC News

A federal appeals court Thursday upheld one of two bans on enforcing President Donald Trump’s executive order restricting travel from six predominately Muslim countries.

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Richmond, Virginia, voted 10-3 to uphold a ruling by a federal judge in Maryland who declared in March that the president’s revised travel order amounted to unconstitutional religious discrimination.

Campaign statements by Donald Trump, who originally called for a ban on Muslim immigration, “provide direct, specific evidence” of what motivated his executive orders — “President Trump’s desire to exclude Muslims from the United States,” the appeals court said.

The revised executive order “cannot be divorced from the cohesive narrative linking it to the animus that inspired it,” the court said in an opinion written by Chief Judge Roger Gregory.

The Justice Department urged the court to lift the ban on enforcement. It said the executive order had a legitimate national security purpose, allowing the government to assess the reliability of background information on visa applicants from six countries associated with terrorism.

But that argument, the court said, “is belied by evidence in the record that President Trump issued the first executive order without consulting with the relevant security agencies.”

After President Trump’s first executive order was blocked in court, the president signed the second one, imposing a 90-day ban on travel from Iran, Sudan, Syria, Libya, Somalia, and Yemen.

Judge Paul Niemeyer, writing in dissent for himself and Judges Dennis Shedd and Steven Agee, said the majority wrongly gave itself the power to “search for evidence suggesting bad faith.”

As for the government’s claim that the president acted to protect national security, the dissenters said “none of the facts or conditions recited as reasons for the issuance of the executive order have been challenged as untrue or illegitimate.”

U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement Thursday that the Justice Department “strongly disagrees” with the decision and would be seeking a review of the case in the Supreme Court.

Sessions added that the president’s executive order was “well within his lawful authority to keep the nation safe.”

“As the dissenting judges explained, the executive order is a constitutional exercise of the President’s duty to protect our communities from terrorism,” Sessions said. “The president is not required to admit people from countries that sponsor or shelter terrorism, until he determines that they can be properly vetted and do not pose a security risk to the United States.”

There really is only one solution to the unlawful rulings issued by Obama judges. That solution is illustrated below. Let the heads of judges and journalists roll.

Nonwhite Democrat Hawaiian Judge Extends Block on Trump Travel Ban

JUDGE DERRICK WATSON. POLITICAL HACK MASQUERADING AS A JUDGE?

Judge Derrick Watson claims that President Donald Trump’s travel ban targeting six countries known to produce and harbor terrorists is unconstitutional because it discriminates against a religion.

Has this judge ever read the Koran? Does he really believe that Islam is a religion, when it clearly is a political ideology of conquest masquerading as a religion.

NPR

President Trump’s executive order to restrict travel to the U.S. from six majority-Muslim countries and suspend the U.S. refugee program has been blocked indefinitely.

The state of Hawaii sued to stop the travel ban, arguing the president’s policy violates the Constitution. U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson has extended his nationwide order blocking the executive order while the lawsuit continues.

Hawaii officials argued that the ban — a modified version issued after the first executive order was also blocked by federal courts — discriminates against travelers on the basis of religion. Watson said in his ruling that the state had shown “a strong likelihood of success on the merits of their Establishment Clause claim, that irreparable injury is likely if the requested relief is not issued.”

As the Two-Way has reported, the president sought to deny entry to citizens of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen for 90 days and suspend the U.S. refugee program for 120 days.

The first part of the executive order, affecting travelers from the six majority-Muslim countries, was also blocked by a U.S. district judge in Maryland. That preliminary injunction remains in effect. The Trump administration is appealing the Maryland ruling to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals.

The Trump administration promised “extreme vetting” of people seeking visas, and has issued guidelines in a series of memorandums from Secretary of State Rex Tillerson to U.S. embassies.

The judge is clearly wrong in this case, as judges often are. There are at least a dozen Muslim countries that are not on the banned list. There is no discrimination against Muslims because of that fact.

In World War II, imagine a ban against the Japanese being overturned on the grounds that Shinto (a Japanese religion) was being discriminated against.

Imagine a ban against Germans being overturned during the war on the grounds that Christians were being discriminated against.

Judge Derrick Watson is a fifth columnist traitor who deserves the same fate as all traitors.

Trump Doubles Down on Criticizing Judicial Tyranny as Liberals Mock Public Right to Safety

The above Tweet by President Trump yesterday has been widely condemned in the press because after all, the USA was set up to be ruled by unelected judges and not elected representatives of the people.

Trump doubled down 12 minutes ago as of this writing with a new Tweet.

There may be more to come from the POTUS.

But meanwhile, the press has exploded with fake news regarding the SEE YOU IN COURT phrase, while ignoring the rest of it: THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE.

The press’s fascination with the alleged brilliant genius of Hillary Clinton’s response would make you think that the witch has given helpless little Donald a wedgie. Check out this “genius:”

Such incredible genius there, right? Three turds in black robes voted to compromise national security and Hillary celebrates. This is the same Hillary who planned a 500 or 600 percent increase in so-called refugees from terrorist nations.

The witch knows how to get a U.S. Ambassador killed, but that’s about the extent of her ability to pontificate on security.

hillary nuts

Even more telling is how the press has gone ape over the phrase SEE YOU IN COURT by citing liberal idiot Tweets as somehow representative of public opinion.

The leftards at Britain’s Metro News title their piece:

Everyone’s mocking Trump mercilessly for his SEE YOU IN COURT tweet

Everyone? Really?

I guess the unfunny comedian Stephen Colbert is everyone:

You can read more of this nonsense if you like in the Metro article or on many other similar articles.

When Trump wrote, SEE YOU IN COURT, even a moron with a 60 level IQ would recognize that he was telling the plaintiffs in the travel ban lawsuit that he would see them in court again. Namely, the AGs for State of Washington and the State of Minnesota, the plaintiffs, are going to have to pack their bags, head to Washington, and argue their case before the Supreme Court.

So, since Tweets by unknown leftists who think they’re clever is not news, what is all the hoopla really about? You know what’s going on.

Delegitimizing Trump.

When Barack Obama ascended to the Oval Office, he was portrayed as the intellectual law professor genius great leader by the press. Hillary Clinton was the smartest woman in the world.

Setting aside any bias I might have about their positions on the issues, the one word that accurately describes these two is:

Bullsh*tters!

But the left love bullsh*t because that’s all it really has going for it.

Since Trump isn’t sitting in the White House spewing bullsh*t like “Diversity is our strength,” then let’s twist his words and meanings into pretzels in order to portray him as stupid. In spite of the fact that he was smart enough to build a business worth several billion dollars and smart enough to defeat the witch who wanted to be president.

trump get in faggot funny

Former Pastor Charged for Passing Out Jury Nullification Flyers in Front of Michigan Courthouse

KEITH WOOD. VICTIM OF JUDICIAL TYRANNY.
keith wood

A white Christian man peacefully handing out fliers in front of a Michigan courthouse got a Thanksgiving present when he was arrested on November 24 and charged with jury tampering.

His fliers explained the concept of jury nullification.

Jury nullification occurs in a trial when a jury acquits a defendant, even though the members of the jury may believe that the defendant did the illegal act, yet they don’t believe he or she should be punished for it. This may occur when members of the jury disagree with the law the defendant has been charged with breaking, or believe that the law should not be applied in that particular case. A jury can similarly unjustly and illegally convict a defendant on the ground of disagreement with an existing law, even if no law is broken (although in jurisdictions with double jeopardy rules, a conviction can be overturned on appeal, but an acquittal cannot).

Keith Wood was able to gain his release from jail by posting 10 percent of his $150,000 bond using his credit card. His experience offers evidence that there is no more rule of law, just thugs in black robes stripping citizens of their rights.

Mlive

As he was handing out the pamphlet to anyone who would take one, Wood, a father of seven, said someone came out of the courthouse and told him to come inside and talk to a judge. Wood said he asked the woman if he was being detained and then said he preferred to stay where he was.

A little while later, a court deputy came outside and told Wood that the judge wanted to talk to him, and if he refused to do so, the Big Rapids police would come and arrest him.

Wood said under threat of arrest he went inside the courthouse where former 20-year county prosecutor and newly-elected Mecosta County District Court Judge Peter Jaklevic told a deputy to “place him in custody for jury tampering.”

One of our regular commenters tipped me off about this outrageous case. I would give that person credit if I could remember who it was.

Heroic Political Prisoner Kim Davis Barred From Raising Money on GoFundMe

HERO KIM DAVIS ON THE JOB. SHE’S SITTING ALONE IN A CELL NOW WITH ONLY HER BIBLE FOR COMPANY.
kim davis

I’ve noticed in the past that conservatives, Christian dissidents, anyone with a view point that runs counter to the libturd narrative, gets barred from GoFundMe. The site would not allow a Christian bakery to raise money either.

Yahoo News has posted a smarmy article on her imprisonment, the shits.

A principled news media would be calling into question judicial tyranny, but there are no principles other than the liberal narrative that drive the media today.

Kentucky Clerk Defies Court Order, Refuses to Issue Marriage License to Lesbian Women

KIM DAVIS. FACING A FINE AND A PRISON TERM FOR HER BELIEFS.
Kim-Davis

America is a nation where a government of force is the order of the day.

When the South decided to divorce the North in 1860-61, force kept the two together. When cannon fodder has been needed for past wars, the draft forced men into uniform. When school integration was forced upon America by the Supreme Court, bayonets were unsheathed to herd white children into integrated schools. In its latest foray into the use of force, courts have forced bakers to bake homosexual wedding cakes and clerks to issue homosexuals marriage license.

One woman, a clerk ordered to issue such marriage licenses by her governor and by a federal court, is defiant. Her name is Kim Davis and she’s a Christian.

Associated Press

MOREHEAD, Ky. (AP) — A gay couple marched into the county clerk’s office Thursday, carrying a federal judge’s order that said the clerk can’t deny them a marriage license based on her deeply held Christian beliefs.

Still, Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis’ office turned them away.

Davis was among a handful of clerks across the country to cite deeply held religious beliefs in denying gay marriage licenses after the Supreme Court legalized gay marriage in June. She was the first to be sued and her attorneys vowed to keep fighting in a case legal experts have likened the resistance some local officials put up five decades ago when the Supreme Court legalized interracial marriage.

Continue reading