Chutzpah: Jew Mayor Rahm Emanuel declares Chicago a ‘Trump free zone’ after DACA decision

HIS HONOR, THE MAYOR OF CHICAGO.

The phrase “Trump-free zone” is totally devoid of any real meaning. It’s a publicity stunt. Rahm is a practitioner of the Democrat party’s brand of identity politics. He’s also a big mouth blowhard, full of hot air.

Rahm ought to devote more energy to solving his city’s murder problem and less energy playing a fool.

Los Angeles Times

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel said Tuesday that the city will continue to welcome Dreamers despite President Trump’s decision to end the DACA program.

“To all the Dreamers that are here in this room and the city of Chicago, you are welcome in the city of Chicago. This is your home and you have nothing to worry about,” Emanuel said to a group of students.

“Chicago — our schools our neighborhoods, our city, as it relates to what President Trump said — will be a Trump-free zone. You have nothing to worry about,” he said.

In 2012, then-President Obama started the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA. Under the program, young people brought to the U.S. illegally as children were protected from deportation. Trump announced Tuesday that those protections will end next March unless Congress acts before then.

Emanuel served as Obama’s chief of staff from January 2009 to October 2010. Obama on Tuesday called Trump’s action wrong and self-defeating.

RAHM EMMANUEL DURING HIS BALLET DAYS.

MR. MAYOR PRACTICING HIS JEWISHNESS.

Va. Car Attacker’s Mother, Samantha Bloom, Probable Jew, Interviewed by AP

The mother of alleged alt-right “terrorist” James Fields appears to be Jewish. Her name is Samantha Bloom. If she’s Jewish, that would make Fields an ethnic Jew.

However the ethnicity issue sorts out, Fields’ mother had no idea what was going on until the Associated Press reporters approached her and told her that her son was accused of murder.

H/T to Sob-A-Tear for this link.

COED

Samantha Bloom, the mother of the 20-year-old suspect who allegedly drove his car into a crowd of protesters, admitted that she knew her son was going to a rally. However, she didn’t know the specifics of the rally, and just thought it had something to do with President Donald Trump.

Saturday night, Ms. Bloom sat down with The Associated Press in Toledo, Ohio. Bloom implied that she knew her son was going to a rally, but didn’t really question him about the specifics. “I just knew he was going to a rally. I mean, I try to stay out of his political views,” said the Ohio mother. “You know, we don’t, you know, I don’t really get too involved, I moved him out to his own apartment, so we — I’m watching his cat.”

When the reporter informed her that the rally her son attended was one set up by white nationalists, she replied that she assumed the rally to be about Donald Trump. “I thought it had something to do with Trump. Trump’s not a white supremacist. He had an African American friend so…”

In a different interview, this time with the The Toledo Blade, Bloom said, “I told him to be careful. [And] if they’re going to rally to make sure he’s doing it peacefully.”

Bloom told AP reporters that she had no idea about Saturday’s deadly vehicular incident in Charlottesville. The mother of the suspect apparently found out about her son’s crime when she was approached by reporters for an interview. She said she was surprised, and “Yeah, that he would run his car into a group of people for… I’m really not clear on…”

Everywhere I’ve seen this video posted the bottom half is grayed out. No worries. It plays just fine. About two minutes.

The AP reporter pressed the suspect’s mother on if he told her more about his plans at Saturday’s rally in Virginia. She seemed to indicat that he was attending an alt-right rally. However, she said she thought it was an ‘albright’ gathering. “Like I said, I don’t really talk to him about his political views,” she said. “He just — so I don’t really understand what the rally was about or anything, so… I just know there was — he did mention it was ‘albright’? What is it? Al–?”

“Alt-right?” replied the reporter, interrupting Bloom mid-sentence.
“Albright,” said Bloom, still incorrectly pronouncing alt-right.

Bloom told the AP that her son grew up in Florence, Kentucky. They later relocated to Toledo, Ohio.

Jew Alan Dershowitz Threatens to Leave Democrat Party if Jew-Hating Negro Muslim Keith Ellison Elected DNC Chair

Great news! Jews are reaping what they sowed.

Hey Jew boy, you wanted diversity and multiculturalism? You got it. In spades (pun intended).

Alan Dershowitz is a pretty honest, decent Jew in some ways. Even if blacks don’t agree. This Negro confuses Jewish supremacy with white supremacy. Dumb!

Oops! How did this one get in there?

Dersh made many trips to pedophile island with Jeffrey Epstein, in case you’re wondering.

Fox News Insider

Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, a high-profile Democrat for decades, said in an op-ed published Friday that he will leave the party if Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) is elected chairman this weekend.

“My loyalty to my country and my principles and my heritage exceeds any loyalty to my party,” Dershowitz, who supported Hillary Clinton in 2016, wrote in “The Hill” newspaper.

Dershowitz recounted Ellison’s history of controversial statements and actions many deemed anti-Semitic, including the congressman’s history with Louis Farrakhan’s “Nation of Islam” movement.

“A prominent lawyer … told me that while he was a law student, Ellison approached her and said he could not respect her because she was a Jew and because she was a woman who should not be at a law school,” Dershowitz claims in the column.

Dershowitz slammed Ellison for disavowing Farrakhan at the same time he was first running for office in Minneapolis, adding that his recent claims of support for Israel coincide with his bid to lead the Democratic National Committee.

Calling the DNC election a “momentous choice,” Dershowitz said the party could either go the direction of British parliamentarian Jeremy Corbyn, who led a far-left shift in the Labour Party, or try to recapture the “Rust Belt” Democrats who switched their allegiance to President Trump last November.

“I hope they choose wisely,” Dershowitz said of the DNC’s voting members, “If they do not, I have made my choice.”

If Jews leave the Democrat party, where are they going to go? Not to Donald Trump, even though he’s the most pro-Jew president anyone could imagine. Jews liked the Democrat party when it was sh*t stirring against whites. Now that it’s sh*t stirring against Jews, they don’t like it.

Like I said, the Jews have reaped what they sowed. Have fun, Jews.

Feinstein: Trump’s ‘Blizzard of Executive Orders’ is ‘Splitting’ US

Surprise! Senator Dianne Feinstein was on a Fox Sunday news talk show where she slammed Donald Trump.

Fox News Insider

Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said on “Fox News Sunday” that President Trump has divided the country by issuing several executive orders.

Regarding his executive order barring immigration from several Middle Eastern countries, Feinstein said that in her role as a legislator she could not rule whether it is unconstitutional, but expressed concern over its effects.

“There has been a blizzard of executive orders and memoranda,” she said, “Some [are] vague, some specific, some probably unlawful. And, you’ve got people in the streets.”

Trump has not brought the United States together, Feinstein said, “what he’s doing is splitting it apart more and more and more.”

She said that anyone has the right to go to court to see if a president’s executive action is lawful and constitutional.

“The president is not a dictator,” she said.

Feinstein says Trump is a bad man because people are in the streets.

Isn’t that acceptance of mob rule?

She’a also complaining about a “blizzard” of executive orders? Trump has issued the same number (approximately) that Obama issued in his first two weeks in office.

When court rulings go against her globalist, New World Order agenda, Feinstein is not afraid to criticize judges, as this 2013 story shows.

When Feinstein says Trump is dividing America, what she’s really saying is that her side lost and they’re going to be all stupid and snotty about it.

Jewess Professor Calls for Military Coup to Overthrow Trump

ROSA BROOKS.
stereotype female jew

Impeachment is too slow a process for Rosa Brooks.

As documented at Wikipedia, she’s no filthy Jew Hollyweird whore, but rather a heavy hitter in foreign policy circles. Her stamp of approval of a military overthrow of he duly elected government headed by Donald Trump constitutes treason.

Get this. She’s a law professor. She knows she’s advocating treason, but apparently is baiting Trump while normalizing the idea of a military coup in the minds of the sheeple.

The hatred of America by 80 percent of Jews is such that they want the country destroyed, no matter the consequences.

Excerpt from Foreign Policy

The fourth possibility is one that until recently I would have said was unthinkable in the United States of America: a military coup, or at least a refusal by military leaders to obey certain orders.

The principle of civilian control of the military has been deeply internalized by the U.S. military, which prides itself on its nonpartisan professionalism. What’s more, we know that a high-ranking lawbreaker with even a little subtlety can run rings around the uniformed military. During the first years of the George W. Bush administration, for instance, formal protests from the nation’s senior-most military lawyers didn’t stop the use of torture. When military leaders objected to tactics such as waterboarding, the Bush administration simply bypassed the military, getting the CIA and private contractors to do their dirty work.

But Trump isn’t subtle or sophisticated: He sets policy through rants and late-night tweets, not through quiet hints to aides and lawyers. He’s thin-skinned, erratic, and unconstrained — and his unexpected, self-indulgent pronouncements are reportedly sending shivers through even his closest aides.

What would top U.S. military leaders do if given an order that struck them as not merely ill-advised, but dangerously unhinged? An order that wasn’t along the lines of “Prepare a plan to invade Iraq if Congress authorizes it based on questionable intelligence,” but “Prepare to invade Mexico tomorrow!” or “Start rounding up Muslim Americans and sending them to Guantánamo!” or “I’m going to teach China a lesson — with nukes!”

It’s impossible to say, of course. The prospect of American military leaders responding to a presidential order with open defiance is frightening — but so, too, is the prospect of military obedience to an insane order. After all, military officers swear to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, not the president. For the first time in my life, I can imagine plausible scenarios in which senior military officials might simply tell the president: “No, sir. We’re not doing that,” to thunderous applause from the New York Times editorial board.

Brace yourselves. One way or another, it’s going to be a wild few years.

At least some of us will fight. I will not say how I would proceed in the event of a military coup, but suffice it to say that I would operate stealthily.

Breitbart covered this story earlier today. Here’s their summary of the whole smear job:

Brooks listed four ways to get rid of a “crummy” president.

Elect him out of office after his four-year term. “But after such a catastrophic first week, four years seems like a long time to wait,” she wrote.

Impeachment. However, she lamented, “impeachments take time: months, if not longer — even with an enthusiastic Congress. And when you have a lunatic controlling the nuclear codes, even a few months seems like a perilously long time to wait.”

Utilizing a claim of mental instability to invoke the 25th Amendment of the Constitution, which sets the path for the commander-in-chief’s removal if the “president is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.”

A military coup. She writes: “The fourth possibility is one that until recently I would have said was unthinkable in the United States of America: a military coup, or at least a refusal by military leaders to obey certain orders.”

And when normal people respond with disdain for their unmitigated chutzpah, they blame “antisemitism.” The jig is up Jew. We’re on to your nonsense.

ROSA BROOKS. DISAGREE WITH HER AND YOU’RE ANTISEMITIC.

Hail Spencer! Richard Spencer Ties White Supremacy to Zionism — Leaves Rabbi Speechless

Richard Spencer got the better of a Rabbi during his presentation at Texas A & M University on Tuesday night.

Jewish Forward

A prominent leader of the “alt-right” left a Hillel rabbi speechless when he drew a direct parallel between white supremacy and Zionism — igniting debate on social media about whether such a comparison has any validity.

Richard Spencer, who leads the white nationalist National Policy Institute, appeared at Texas A&M University in College Station, Texas on Tuesday night. Hundreds of students protested outside of the event, while others stood silently with raised fists inside the hall.

During a question-and-answer session, Texas A&M Hillel’s Rabbi Matt Rosenberg stood and invited the white nationalist to join him in Torah study. Rosenberg’s invitation, and Spencer’s response, were captured on video by The Eagle, the Texas A&M student paper, and viewed widely on Twitter.

“My tradition teaches a message of radical inclusion and love,” Rosenberg said. “Will you sit town and learn Torah with me, and learn love?”

Spencer declined the invitation, but used it as an opportunity to suggest that the objectives of Zionism and Jewish continuity were close to his own goals for white people.

“Do you really want radical inclusion into the State of Israel?” Spencer said. “And by that I mean radical inclusion. Maybe all of the Middle East could go move in to Tel Aviv or Jerusalem. Would you really want that?”

Rosenberg, who later admitted he is not a good debater, stood silent.

“You’re not answering,” Spencer said.

“I’m not answering,” Rosenberg said.

Spencer went on to argue that Jewish continuity is predicated on resistance to assimilation. He framed that cultural imperative as similar to the movement for so-called white rights in the U.S.

“Jews exist precisely because you did not assimilate,” he said. “That is why Jews are a coherent people with a history and a culture and a future. It’s because you had a sense of yourselves. I respect that about you. I want my people to have that same sense of themselves.”

Rosenberg later acknowledged that the confrontation wasn’t his best moment.

“I wasn’t on the high school debate team,” Rosenberg told the Forward. “I really didn’t want to get into it. That might have been the wrong decision, but I’ll let the next rabbi deal with it.”

Rosenberg, the Hillel rabbi at Texas A&M for the past three years, said he found Spencer’s attempt to get him to defend Israel erroneous and bordering on anti-Semitic.

“I am a simple teacher of Torah,” he said.

Mainstream pro-Israel groups including J Street and AIPAC did not respond to request for comment about Spencer’s remarks.

Strident critics of Israel were quick to jump on the one-sided debate between Spencer and the rabbi as evidence that Zionism shares some ideological common ground with far right political movements.

“The fact that white nationalists see something to admire in Israel is alarming,” said Naomi Dann, a spokeswoman for Jewish Voice for Peace. “In this new political era, we need to be able to have conversations in the Jewish community that grapple with the deep questions about what Israel has become.”

Max Blumenthal, an activist and harsh critic of Israel, tweeted that the incident illustrates why “Zionists are poorly positioned to confront white nationalists.”

But Mort Klein of the Zionist Organization of America forcefully disagreed with the comparison between white nationalism, calling it “a false and absurd analogy.” “Arab Muslims and Christians make up a full 20 percent of Israel’s population and have the same rights there as everyone else,” he told the Forward. “Jews, we maintain our own culture, but always have relationships with people from other groups, his statement is ridiculous.”

Disgusting Jewess TV Hostess Joy Behar Calls Clinton Rape Victims “Tramps”

JOY BEHAR. DENIES BEING A JEW. LOOKS LIKE A JEW. MARRIED TO A JEW. BUT NOT A JEW ACCORDING TO HER.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/146970485@N04/29622815494/in/dateposted-public/

The sick culture that the Jew has created is exemplified by a loathsome TV show called The View.

The show features some really dumb women sitting around a table talking about important issues as if their liberal commentary had value.

I have rarely seen the program but generally it seems to be just noise.

But when you claim to be representing women and you call Bill Clinton’s sexual assault victims “tramps,” you might get some pushback.

Daily Caller

Joy Behar said that the women who have accused Bill Clinton of a broad range of sexual misconducts are “tramps” during Monday’s broadcast of “The View.”

“That’s start with the fact that she was the victim in all this,” noted co-host Whoopi Goldberg of Donald Trump’s decision to bring Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey and Paula Jones at Sunday night’s presidential debate in St. Louis. “She was the one whom dirty was done, and Donald redid the dirty by reintroducing [inaudible].”

Behar then explained that Hillary “wouldn’t bring all the dirt up” when provoked by Trump.

“[Clinton] was being nice about the fact that her daughter was in the audience,” she continued, before stating she would have like to see the former secretary of state “apologize to those tramps who have slept with [her] husband.”

“Maybe she could have said that.”

This isn’t the first time Behar has made rape jokes on air.

Back in January, she stated she would vote for a rapist, as long as they were a liberal.

Joy Behar’s Facebook page shows many critical comments aimed at the Jew pig.

Here’s the video of the ugly whore spewing her hatred of women who were Clinton victims.