Alex Jones attributes Virginia violence to ‘Jewish actors’

JEW PROVOCATEURS?

Alex Jones, master of the limited hangout, proposes a theory with some truth behind it. However, it deflects from the (((antifa))), whose illegal acts have been totally ignored. It also helps keep George Soros hidden in the shadows.

New York Daily News

Alex Jones’ mind works in strangely anti-Semitic ways.

The conspiracy theorist, creator of InfoWars and host of “The Alex Jones Show” on the Genesis Communications Network and WWCR in Austin, Texas, is now peddling a theory that “Unite the Right” protesters were Jewish actors disguised as Nazis.

The actors, Jones believes, were inciting violence to quell conservative unity.

This flies in the face of accounts of the Charlottesville, Va. violence on Saturday, which left one woman dead and nearly 20 injured. Those numbers come from the initial skirmish — more were injured in brawls and two state troopers died in a helicopter crash.

Man hit by car in Charlottesville recounts moment of fatal crash
James Fields Jr., who is reportedly a neo-Nazi white supremacist, plowed a gray sedan through a crowd of counter-protesters in the Virginia college town. The white supremacists originally gathered to protest the planned removal of a Confederate statue.

Jones said on Sunday that the events in Charlottesville were “false flags” — suggesting a wider government conspiracy meant to control the populace with planned terror attacks, Salon.com writes.

Jones shares similar beliefs with the Sandy Hook shooting and 9/11.

Jones believes the KKK protesters were Jewish actors who looked like “the cast of Seinfeld,” according to Media Matters.

James Fields held without bond for fatal Charlottesville crash
He said, “Nothing against Jews in general, but they are leftists Jews that want to create this clash and they go dress up as Nazis. I have footage in Austin — we’re going to find it somewhere here at the office — where it literally looks like cast of ‘Seinfeld’ or like Howard Stern in a Nazi outfit. They all look like Howard Stern.”

He continued, saying, “They almost got like little curly hair down, and they’re just up there heiling Hitler. You can tell they are totally uncomfortable, they are totally scared and it’s all just meant to create the clash.”

The fat man has it right. No one in (((Big Media))) is reporting that Dodge’s stunt car driver who lost control of his great looking Dodge Challenger in Charlottesville is a Jew.

No one is also reporting that trustworthy witnesses on the ground reported a number of Jew Nazis who had infiltrated their ranks.

If Alex is controlled opposition, and he probably is, the Deep State probably sent him out with the truth that Jews were LARPing as Nazis. The idea of sending Jones out with the truth is that because he’s considered so disreputable, no one will believe the truth.

NY DAILY NEWS PHOTO OF ALEX JONES LOOKING INSANE.

Roger Stone: McMaster Reporting Directly to Soros

Roger Stone breaks the biggest story of his career in the interview with Alex Jones below. If true, this is huge. He claims that Israel’s Secret Service, the Mossad, has intercepted regular communications between Trump’s National Security Advisor and Jewish billionaire George Soros. Stone also claims to be part of a secret group devoted to turning Trump back toward sanity in foreign policy.

Be careful here. Stone has admitted to lying in the past in order to achieve his political objectives.

Keep an eye on the McMaster story. Also keep an eye on Trump’s actions relating to the military option.

The McMaster-Soros connection is real. It’s documented.

Israel Nation News

White House National Security Adviser Herbert McMaster served at an England-based think tank financed by a George Soros-funded group. The Obama White House identified the group as having been central in helping to sell the Iran nuclear deal to the public and news media, reports Breitbart.

From September 2006 to February 2017, McMaster is listed as consulting senior fellow for the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS). The IISS defines itself as a “world-leading authority on global security, political risk and military conflict.”

This week, after questions addressed to them by Breitbart, the IISS site added George Soros’ Open Society Foundation to its list of donors.

The fund has appeared on this list in the past but was deleted from it on an unknown date. Plowshares is also on the list of donors, although both they and the Open Society Foundation include the IISS in their list of contributors.

Plowshares played a vital role in marketing the nuclear deal with Iran to the American public, as revealed by Ben Rhodes, Barack Obama’s National Security Advisor, to the New York Times Magazine. Rhodes said the fund helped recruit a network of experts who spoke to journalists “who often had no idea between their right and left” and sold the agreement through them.

McMaster objected to the use of the term “Islamic terrorism,” and recently fired three members of the National Security Council who held a firm line against Iran. Caroline Glick reported this week on her Facebook that he replaced them with characters like Kris Bauman, whom she described as “Israel hater and Hamas supporter.” McMaster is the man who convinced Donald Trump not to allow Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu to accompany Trump when he visited the Western Wall.

The Zionist Organization of America announced that it would conduct a comprehensive investigation into McMaster’s positions on various issues throughout his career.

Among US conservatives a negative opinion is forming against McMaster, and on social networks one can hear voices calling him a “traitor” and demanding his dismissal.

Thursday afternoon at his press conference, Trump again expressed confidence in General McMaster. Read more at Politico. If Stone is right, Trump is supporting McMaster without knowing all the facts.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio: “Where is Trump?”

What I like about this piece is not so much that Sheriff Joe is questioning Trump’s loyalty to him, which is legit, but the description of how a liberal woman judge has railroaded Joe into spending huge sums of money defending himself in court, and still finding him guilty.

As long as there are Obama judges on the bench there will be no rule of law. This case proves it. If the New World Order doesn’t have the ability to prosecute legitimately a friend to the rule of law like Sheriff Joe, then it will turn to crooked judges to get the job done.

Trump should have pardoned Joe on Day 1 of his presidency.

Infowars

WASHINGTON, D.C. – After being convicted of criminal misdemeanor contempt, former Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio has come out swinging, arguing the judge was biased and asking why President Trump is abandoning him, considering Arpaio was an early campaign supporter whose conviction reflects the determination to enforce immigration laws the Trump Justice Department is now exhibiting.

“Where is President Trump on this case?” Arpaio asked Infowars.com in an exclusive interview. “This is a witch hunt against me that is being carried forward by Obama holdovers in Attorney General Sessions’ Department of Justice.”

“I’m being convicted for honestly trying to enforce the immigration laws that Trump swore during the campaign he would uphold if elected president,” Arpaio insisted.

Arpaio was one of Trump’s early supporters, endorsing Trump formally in a statement issued on Jan. 27, 2016.

“Donald Trump is a leader. He produces results and is ready to get tough in order to protect American jobs and families,” Arpaio said in a statement released by Trump’s campaign at that time. “I have fought on the front lines to prevent illegal immigration. I know Donald Trump will stand with me and countless Americans to secure our border.”

Starting in January 2016, Arpaio began appearing with Trump at campaign rallies, endorsing Trump’s promise to “build a wall” as a needed measure to enforce aggressively immigration laws already on the books.

“I have great respect for Sheriff Arpaio,” Trump said in an official campaign statement, accepting Arpaio’s endorsement. “We must restore law and order on the border and respect the men and women of our police forces. I thank him for his support of my policies and candidacy for president.”

“A biased judge”
Arpaio’s attorney, Mark Goldman, Goldman & Zillinger PLLC in Scottsdale, Ariz., explained to Infowars.com in an exclusive telephone interview and follow-up email that the judge in the case, U.S. District Susan R. Bolton, was so biased against Arpaio that she could have written her opinion before the trial even started, stating her prejudice from the start that Arpaio was guilty of misdemeanor civil contempt guilty conviction.

JUDGE SUSAN BOLTON.

Continue reading

Anti-Trump Presidential Assistant Loyal to Bush Threatens to Fire Fans of Infowars and MILO

Alt-light journalist Jack Pesobiac names a woman assistant to the President who is backstabbing Trump by preventing his supporters from taking White House Jobs. Jana Toner is her name. Here’s a link to Jana Colletti Toner’s Facebook. Trump needs to fire her!

Excerpt from Medium

Multiple sources within the White House have confirmed that Jana Toner, a member of the Presidential Personnel Office, is regularly heard publicly insulting prominent pro-Trump media figures, including former Breitbart Technology editor Milo Yiannopoulos and Infowars founder Alex Jones. Mrs. Toner has even told White House interns that sharing content from Mr. Yiannopoulos or Mr. Jones’ Infowars on social media is grounds for dismissal.

Furthermore, two White House interns recounted how other employees with the Presidential Personnel Office, at the direction of Mrs. Toner, have also threatened to blacklist them from the White House internship program if they have posted anything from Yiannopoulos, Jones, or Infowars on their personal social media accounts.

The first line on the White House internship program application demands to know the applicant’s “Contact information and social media accounts,” which in turn allows Mrs. Toner and her staffers use to weed out Trump supporters from the program.

One intern, who wished to remain anonymous described experiencing a “chilling effect” after a PPO employee who reports directly to Mrs. Toner declared: “We will search through your Facebook and we will find everything,” and “If you like Milo Yiannopolous or Alex Jones this isn’t the place for you” at the outset of the internship program. That same intern noted that the PPO employee who proclaimed this mispronounced both Mr. Yiannopoulos’ first and last names.

This news comes along with the firings of multiple Trump loyalists from the National Security Council by HR McMaster. McMaster was appointed National Security Advisor after the firing to Michael Flynn. McMaster was recommended to the White House by Senator Tom Cotton who has ties to notorious NeverTrump megadonor Paul Singer.

Members of the “Never Trump” movement have not only managed to sneak into the Trump Administration — they have now penetrated the upper echelons of the Presidential Personnel Office (PPO) and are wielding enormous influence over key hiring decisions across the federal government. Johnny DeStefano, who previously served as an aide to ousted House Speaker John Boehner, is currently the head of the PPO, and has used his position to block Trump supporters from key positions, as Cernovich Media first reported. (https://medium.com/@Cernovich/may-massacre-johnny-destefano-to-purge-trump-supporters-on-may-22nd-2c00b57e418c)

Jeb and George Bush loyalist Jana Toner, is currently the Associate Director and Special Assistant to the President at PPO. Toner is leading a behind-the-scenes effort to hire establishment Republicans and DC insiders instead of staff who back President Trump’s American First agenda.

Toner has established herself as a prominent anti-Trump presence within PPO, going out of her way to limit the number of Trump campaign employees accepted into the prestigious White House internship program to just three (out of over 100 positions). Toner was heard justifying such efforts on her belief that students who took time off school to work for the Trump campaign are typically not “intellectually qualified” to work as White House interns.

Toner is a Bush family loyalist, having served the George W. Bush Administration in numerous capacities. From 2003–2004, she worked as a Special Assistant in the Department of Public Affairs in the Department of Energy under Bush’s first Secretary of Energy and top ally, Spencer Abraham, who was given that Cabinet position after he lost his US Senate reelection in Michigan. While he was a Senator, Abraham had infamously blocked Bill Clinton’s plan to cut legal immigration, for which he was awarded the “Defender of the Melting Pot” award from La Raza, a far-left, open borders group. Toner later went on to work in a number of capacities for Bush’s Department of Education, which oversaw the wildly unpopular “No Child Left Behind” policy, until the conclusion of Bush’s second term.

A White House source familiar with the situation confirmed Toner’s personal views align more closely with those of neoconservative politicians like George W. Bush and Spencer Abraham than those of nationalists like President Trump, insisting “it’s no secret that Jana was fiercely opposed to Donald Trump in the primaries.”

If true, good work by Pesobiac in giving the world some insight into how Trump is being sabotaged by staffers loyal to anyone but him.

It’s despicable and possibly a violation of Constitutional rights to fire people for liking alternative media figures like Alex Jones and MILO.

Anthropologist Says “White Genocide” is a “Good Plan”

His name is Michael Oman-Reagan. That name raises the question of why he has a hyphenated last name.

He’s most likely a queer. Most queers are as crazy as this fool. If he thinks genociding the white race is such a good idea, I suggest that he go first. And take his black boyfriend along with him, assuming he has a black boyfriend.

It’s frightening to think that Oman-Reagan may be teaching your son or daughter in the near future when he obtains his doctoral degree.

Infowars

According to anthropologist Michael P. Oman-Reagan, “white genocide” is a “good plan” because it will entrench leftist power by preventing right-wingers from having babies.

Oman-Reagan is a Vanier Scholar and Ph.D. candidate in the department of anthropology at Memorial University of Newfoundland.

“White genocide and why it’s a good plan,” tweeted Oman-Reagan, before going on to list a number of reasons why he thought the elimination of an entire race was progressive.

“Instead of politics, the Liberal Media Elite should orchestrate deep social ad campaigns to convince people to never reproduce with….” he added, before an emoticon of a frog to symbolize the alt-right.

Oman-Reagan said preventing alt-right “Frog-Milk boys” from reproducing was a good thing because, “They won’t be able to teach any children to be full of hate or terrible attempts at owning people online.”

“They can leave the politics to the leftists, who will ensure everyone has healthcare, free education, right to food and housing, etc,” remarked Oman-Reagan, before later tweeting that America was a “racist nation” with a constitution that primarily benefited “white supremacists”.

He subsequently tweeted that the First Amendment and free speech were also enjoyed primarily only by “male white supremacists”.

The anthropologist later championed the “incredible diversity in the classroom” at another college.

To illustrate the insanity of his political positions, Oman-Reagan later tweeted that he wanted to abolish all prisons.

One wonders what reaction a major university would have to one of their faculty members calling for black genocide.

Given the hysterical state of social justice warrior-controlled campuses these days, Oman-Reagan will probably get a pay raise for his revolting anti-white racism.

EMSNEWS.WORDPRESS reports that Oman-Reagan made a threat against President Trump and was visited by the Secret Service. I haven’t been able to verify that, but it seems like something this insane drama queen would do.

Jones vs. Kelly: Finally Over?

The embedded video above shows Alex Jones, Mike Cernovich, and Steve Pieczenik talking about the lies and distortions that Megyn Kelly brought to the table with her segment on Jones Sunday night.

NBC is blocking the publication of Megyn Kelly’s “interview” with Alex Jones on youtube. You can watch it on the Megyn Kelly webpage.

Kelly’s interview is a hatchet job. Until I heard the biased language coming from Kelly and her guests I never knew that anyone considered the Fat Man to be offensive because of his presentation of alternate views of some of the major news events of this century–9/11, the Sandy Hook shootings, Obama’s birth certificate, and more. The thing that bothered most of the conspiracy realists I follow was his failure to address the Jewish Question.

You have to believe that the sudden mainstream media interest in Jones is related to his relationship with President Donald Trump. By smearing Jones, some of the mud splatters upon Trump too.

When you consider that the press smears Trump a dozen times a day, seven days a week with their fake news narratives, why would anyone trust the press to tell the truth about Jones or any other “deplorable”?

Furthermore, when you consider the Neocon’s love of war and hostility to freedom, why would you trust the government to tell the truth?

All of the stories related to Kelly’s 17 minutes of anti-Jones, anti-Trump material stick with the narrative that Jones is evil and dangerous.

Excerpt from Variety

The one strong takeaway from the entire segment was that Jones is newsworthy and dangerous because he has the ear of our volatile president. The segment starts with that sentiment, and then proceeds to enumerate various situations in which Jones is a concerning public figure (including an interview with Neil Heslin, who lost his son in the Sandy Hook tragedy). Then it ends. To be sure, Kelly is right to observe that the connection is worth investigating. But the “Sunday Night” segment doesn’t seem like investigating; it’s instead a wind-up to a punch with no subsequent impact.

At least Variety acknowledges Kelly’s failures. But that’s probably because liberals hate her for her prior association with Fox News.

Excerpt from Deadline

One of Kelly’s fiercest critics, watchdog site Media Matters, called the broadcast “a report that was originally billed as a self-promotional head-to-head showdown with Alex Jones but got turned into “a well-edited investigation of the dangers posed by an unstable megalomaniac with millions of loyal fans, including one in the Oval Office” owing to a “well-deserved firestorm of denunciations.”

Insisting that Kelly deserves little credit for the changes the org warned its damage already had been done, saying “the network’s impotent reaction to Jones’ own grabs for media attention may allow the nation’s biggest producer of conspiracy theory media to come out the winner of tonight’s program.”

Jones seemed to agree. On YouTube, he live-streamed himself breaking open a bottle of champagne and calling the broadcast a big win.

Kellybots will follow her lead and spend Monday at the watercooler at work echoing the nonsense that Jones is dangerous. He may be loud and he may not get everything right and he may even be controlled opposition, but questioning 9/11 and Sandy Hook is patriotic, not dangerous.

The dirtbags at NBC and the liberal media don’t understand the appeal of Alex Jones. I could only find one article that treats him fairly.

Excerpt from American Thinker

Considering the longer term, Jones is in touch with and riding the wave of a powerful new meme that’s gaining currency worldwide. Its adherents believe that the game is stacked against the middle class as powerful and often unseen Deep State actors, globalists, the media, academia, popular culture, government bureaucracies, and other corrupt players conspire to transform for the worse life as we know it. Peaceful opposition to this onslaught is, as Jones has defined it – the Infowar. The Internet and the new media are making more plausible a worldwide wake-up call and a paradigm shift in information, awareness, and action. And they aren’t going away.

Meanwhile, one wonders what the NBC suits are thinking now about their widely reported $15 million-plus investment in their new golden girl, Megyn Kelly. She is decidedly not an Infowarrior or open in the least to the emerging new paradigm. And as her work at NBC is demonstrating, she is not even a good journalist.

Styx, not a fan of Jones or Kelly also gets it.

Twitter reactions:

Megyn Kelly’s Clownshow with Alex Jones Promises Fun Sunday Night Viewing

The media coverage of Sunday night’s Megyn Kelly hatchet job on the Fat Man, Alex Jones, has been extensive. It’s been enjoyable reading all the liberal anger with Kelly for her daring move to give Alex Jones credibility by interviewing him, even if the interview is a smear job.

Regular Lew Rockwell contributor Gary North explains how the media tries to slice and dice conservatives, using Kelly-Jones as the focal point.

Excerpt from Lew Rockwell

Megan Kelly got a promotion from Fox News to NBC because Donald Trump insulted her during an early Republican presidential debate. This promotion did not include an increase in wisdom. It merely gave her a larger audience for her to reveal her limitations. Her limitations are considerable.

Her latest bonehead move was to interview Alex Jones. This got her in trouble with NBC, because nobody is supposed to interview Jones. That would give him some degree of credibility. The mainstream media do not want to consider him as anyone who deserves credibility.

The mainstream media still believe that someone like Jones can get credibility only from the mainstream media. They still think it’s 1995.

Her response was this: she thinks he is despicable. She said that his view of Sandy Hook as a hoax is revolting. That bought her a little time. But time will run out on the evening of June 18, when her interview is scheduled to be run.

Jones did what any sensible conservative should always do when interviewed by the mainstream media. He made a secret recording of the entire interview. Now he has released the entire interview on YouTube.

Here’s the audio of the exchange between Kelly and Jones. In all honesty, it’s too painful for me to listen to, but it’s here for your convenience if you can stand to listen to Kelly.

There’s more leaked material at Infowars. There’s also over 3,000 comments there from Infowars readers.

He says that he did not claim to believe the story that Sandy Hook was a hoax. He simply said that he had offered theories regarding Sandy Hook to his viewers.

SELECTIVE QUOTATIONS

The game the liberals play is always the same. Anything that makes a conservative’s position look sensible is eliminated by three dots. The writer gets to pick and choose what he wants to illustrate. If he wants to illustrate something that will make a conservative look bad, he will quote him. He will not mention the missing qualifications to the outrageous statements.

Some journalists will quote the conservative link. When the conservative says something sensible, the journalist then adds three dots. These indicate a break in the interview. But most journalists don’t do this. They simply enter the quotation with a quotation mark. Then they continue to summarize what the conservative really means, which is what the journalist wants the reader to believe that the conservative really means. Then he provides another brief quotation inside quotation marks. This is an ancient technique of journalists. I’ve been a journalist long enough to know that this is how the game is played.

The media have been unsuccessful in doing this to me. That is because my statements are so outrageous and unqualified in any way that they prove irresistible to Left-wing journalists. These people usually quote me verbatim. I get my point across, and they get to look like heroes for having exposed to me.

The crucial point is this: almost nobody pays any attention. Hardly anybody reads these stories. My followers rarely read these stories. Liberals rarely read them.

Here is reality: journalists don’t have much clout. I learned this 40 years ago. “Sticks and stones will break my bones, but liberal journalists can never hurt me.” (You may quote me verbatim.)

In the case of Alex Jones, this is a bonanza for him. His followers are laughing derisively at Megyn Kelly. She is now under the digital sword of Damocles. If she runs her edited snippets, she will look like a fraud. In other words, she will look like exactly what she is.

On the other hand, if the network now has some junior technician frantically reinserting what Jones really said, Jones will look like a semi-reasonable fellow. Kelly will still look like a fraud, because Jones forced her hand early. He went public about the existence of his interview before she ran her hatchet job. Then he released the file.

She is now on the hook. I call it her Sandy Hook hook. No matter what she runs on her show on Sunday evening, she is going to look like a fraud. She can either be seen as a boneheaded, unwavering fraud, or she can be seen as a cowardly fraud who reinserted Jones’s qualifications, or worse, as a fraud who refuses to run the segment on Jones, despite the fact that she promised that she would.

The fallout from the clownshow will last a couple of days. The Jones vs Kelly feud will go on much longer.