Wetback “Chick with a ****” Found Guilty of Sexually Assaulting 10 Year Old Girl in Bathroom

MIGUEL “MICHELLE” MARTINEZ. GUILTY.

“Michelle” Martinez doesn’t fit the media image of the beautiful, sexy tranny, does he? He’s the real face of the T in LGBT.

Billings Gazette

A Casper resident was found guilty Wednesday of sexually assaulting a 10-year-old girl.

A 12-person jury found Miguel Martinez guilty of first-degree and second-degree sexual abuse of a minor. Martinez could face up to 70 years in prison.

The 10-year-old’s mother reported to Casper police in March that her daughter said Martinez sexually assaulted her in a bathroom.

The girl told investigators that Martinez, who is a family friend, sexually assaulted her. Nurses at the Wyoming Medical Center completed a sexual assault exam and found redness and abrasions on the girl’s genitalia.

Martinez denied molesting the child to arresting officers and pleaded not guilty to the charges in May at an arraignment in Natrona County District Court.

The trial began Monday.

After Miguel is castrated so he can become a true “chick,” he should be deported. Mexico loves trannies. A whole lot of Mexican prostitutes have a penis, you know.

George W. Bush Defends Globalist Agenda, Attacks Trump for Bigotry, Denounces Conspiracy Theories

It was a big day for Georgie Boy. He put on his big boy pants and gave a speech.

Yawn.

He’s dead to me now.

BBC

Nowhere in George W Bush’s 2,000-word speech does he mention the name Donald Trump. It was crystal clear, however, that the 43rd US president took dead aim on the 45th president from a podium at the Lincoln Center in New York City on Thursday.

Ex-presidents traditionally shy away from the political stage. It was long considered in poor taste for a former occupant of the Oval Office to criticise one of his successors.

Then again, these are days when seemingly set-in-stone norms and standards of behaviour have fallen by the wayside.

Mr Trump’s victory in the Republican presidential primaries was in some measure a repudiation of Mr Bush’s presidency and his vision for the Republican Party – and not just because the New Yorker belittled and subsequently bested Mr Bush’s brother, Jeb Bush.

Mr Trump frequently criticised Mr Bush’s decision to invade Iraq. He bashed the Texan’s efforts to broaden the Republican Party’s appeal to Hispanic voters by pushing for comprehensive immigration reform. He denounced free trade deals, including Nafta – signed by Mr Bush’s father, George HW Bush.

Now Mr Bush is offering his rebuke. When asked after his speech if his message would reach the White House, he smiled and replied, “I think it will”.

Here are just a few of the choicest lines that might be flying toward 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue – and what they could mean.

Since World War II, America has encouraged and benefited from the global advance of free markets, from the strength of democratic alliances, and from the advance of free societies.

Mr Bush offers the classic defence of an internationalist foreign policy – that engagement and advancement of free markets and free societies is in the US’s best long-term interests.

Compare that to Mr Trump’s contention that the US has been taken advantage of by other nations – both through trade and in defence arrangements. He has expressed general distrust of multilateral engagement and views the global arena as a largely a zero-sum contest between competing national interests, where the US must put “America first”.

Our politics seems more vulnerable to conspiracy theories and outright fabrication.

Mr Trump rose to national prominence by becoming a high-profile advocate of a particularly insidious conspiracy theory – that Barack Obama was not born in the US and, consequently, was ineligible to be president.

We’ve seen nationalism distorted into nativism – forgotten the dynamism that immigration has always brought to America.

Mr Trump not only has pushed for a crackdown on undocumented immigration, he’s proposed drastic cuts in refugee resettlement programmes and backed a bill in Congress that would cut in half the number of permanent residency “green cards” issued each year.

According to our intelligence services, the Russian government has made a project of turning Americans against each other.

Mr Trump, and his supporters, have consistently expressed scepticism about the conclusion by US government officials that Russian agents and hackers attempted to influence the US presidential election through social media, fake new reports and the release of purloined material from Democratic Party sources.

Our identity as a nation – unlike many other nations – is not determined by geography or ethnicity, by soil or blood… Bigotry or white supremacy in any form is blasphemy against the American creed.

“Blood and soil” was one of the phrases white supremacists chanted as they demonstrated in Charlottesville, Virginia, the night before violent clashes with counter-protesters in August. (Another was “Jews will not replace us”).

Bullying and prejudice in our public life sets a national tone, provides permission for cruelty and bigotry, and compromises the moral education of children.

During the primary campaign, Mr Trump called Jeb Bush a hypocrite, weak, low-energy, a lightweight, a failure, a “sad sack” and a “pathetic figure” with “zero communications skills”.

He tweeted that Jeb had to ask his “mommy to take a slap at me” but that “mom can’t help you with ISIS, the Chinese or Putin”.

Go away, George, you and your whole family.

First Look: Prototypes of Trump’s Wall are Under Construction

If you’re a native born American and you don’t like Trump’s wall there’s something wrong with you.

Even as mere symbolism, the wall makes an impressive statement. In the end, the wall should be more than symbolism though. It will keep at least some invaders out of the country.

Now, if only Congress will cooperate so the wall can be built. It’s not clear that Congress will fund it or legislate in such a way that Mexicans pay for it. But there’s no doom and gloom here. The wall looks impressive, so let’s do it.

Excerpt from AZ Central

SAN DIEGO — Workers toiled in intense 95-degree heat here Tuesday, putting final touches on eight possible versions of President Donald Trump’s long-promised border wall.

As an Oct. 26 deadline to finish the prototype border-wall designs drew near, The Arizona Republic toured the construction site a few dozen yards from the border that divides this city from neighboring Tijuana, Mexico.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection awarded eight contracts to six companies, including two from Arizona, to build the prototypes. Four are made of reinforced concrete, and another four incorporate additional construction materials. Construction began on Sept. 26, giving companies 30 days to finish.

By Tuesday afternoon, when CBP allowed The Republic access to the site, five of the wall designs had already been completed and were fenced off with caution tape.

But crews were still at work on others, installing vertical concrete panels on one design, using cranes and bulldozers to place them upright. Another two prototypes were in various stages of construction.

The construction site is about 2 miles east of San Diego’s Otay Mesa border crossing, in the foothills of the Otay Mountains.

At 30 feet, the designs dwarf the primary fence that currently marks the international boundary — it’s made of rusted Vietnam War-era landing mats. They are nearly twice the height of the secondary metal-mesh fence, which ends near where the prototypes are being built.

Their height, officials said, is intended to make a statement to criminals and would-be unauthorized crossers: Stay away.

“The 30 feet is very impressive,” said Mario Villareal, the division chief for the San Diego Sector Border Patrol. “What we’re trying to accomplish is by putting tactical infrastructure on the border, by having all-weather roads, by putting Border Patrol agents on the immediate border is the deterrence.”

Whether the border-wall prototypes keep people away, will be closely scrutinized in the coming weeks. After they are done, CBP will move to the “test and evaluation” of each of the eight structures.

There are more pictures at the link.

Nonwhite Judge Blocks Trump’s Latest Travel Ban

JUDGE DERRICK WATSON. BLOCKED EARLIER TRAVEL BAN TOO.

Wikipedia tells us that Judge Derrick Watson, who is determined to prevent any travel ban at all from ever taking place for any reason, is an Obama appointee. He is a Native Hawaiian.

He’s also not surprisingly allegedly received threats for his unconcern with public safety.

So, back goes the Attorney General’s office to the Supreme Court, which really needs to excoriate this little Hawaiian worn.

ABC News

A federal judge in Hawaii blocked most of President Donald Trump’s latest travel ban Tuesday, just hours before it was set to take effect, saying the revised order “suffers from precisely the same maladies as its predecessor.”

It was the third set of travel restrictions issued by the president to be thwarted, in whole or in part, by the courts.

U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson issued the ruling after the ban on a set of mostly Muslim countries was challenged by the state of Hawaii, which warned that the restrictions would separate families and undermine the recruiting of diverse college students.

White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders called the ruling “dangerously flawed” and said it “undercuts the president’s efforts to keep the American people safe.” The Justice Department said it will quickly appeal.

At issue was a ban, announced in September and set to go into effect early Wednesday, on travelers from Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria and Yemen, along with some Venezuelan government officials and their families.

The Trump administration said the ban was based on an assessment of each country’s security situation and willingness to share information with the U.S.

Watson, appointed to the bench by President Barack Obama, said the new restrictions ignore a federal appeals court ruling against Trump’s previous ban.

The latest version “plainly discriminates based on nationality in the manner that the 9th Circuit has found antithetical to … the founding principles of this nation,” Watson wrote.

The judge’s ruling applies only to the six Muslim-majority countries on the list. It does not affect the restrictions against North Korea or Venezuela, because Hawaii did not ask for that.

“This is the third time Hawaii has gone to court to stop President Trump from issuing a travel ban that discriminates against people based on their nation of origin or religion,” Hawaii Attorney General Doug Chin said in a statement. “Today is another victory for the rule of law.”

Hawaii argued the updated ban was a continuation of Trump’s campaign call for a ban on Muslims, despite the addition of two countries without a Muslim majority.

Watson noted that Hawaii had argued Trump did not back down from that call, listing in the ruling a series of June tweets “in which (Trump) complained about how the Justice Department had submitted a ‘watered down, politically correct version’ to the Supreme Court.”

Other courts that weighed the travel ban have cited Trump’s comments about banning Muslims, including the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Virginia and a federal judge in Maryland. Watson also referred to a Trump campaign statement in his previous ruling.

His Tuesday ruling said the new ban, like its predecessor, fails to show that nationality alone makes a person a greater security risk to the U.S.

“The categorical restrictions on entire populations of men, women and children, based upon nationality, are a poor fit for the issues regarding the sharing of ‘public-safety and terrorism-related information’ that the president identifies,” Watson wrote.

He said the ban is inconsistent in the way some countries are included or left out. For example, Iraq failed to meet the security benchmark but was omitted from the ban. Somalia met the information-sharing benchmark but was included.

Watson found fault with what sorts of visitors are barred. For instance, all tourists and business travelers from Libya are excluded from the U.S., but student visitors were allowed.

The judge said he would set an expedited hearing to determine whether the temporary restraining order blocking the ban should be extended. It comes as other courts weigh challenges to the ban.

In Maryland, the American Civil Liberties Union and other groups are seeking to block the visa and entry restrictions. Washington state, Massachusetts, California, Oregon, New York and Maryland are challenging the order in front of the same federal judge in Seattle who struck down Trump’s initial ban in January.

That ban — aimed mostly at Muslim-majority countries — led to chaos and confusion at airports nationwide and triggered several lawsuits, including one from Hawaii.

When Trump revised the ban, Hawaii challenged that version, too, and Watson agreed it discriminated on the basis of nationality and religion. A subsequent U.S. Supreme Court ruling allowed the administration to partially reinstate restrictions against Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen and against all refugees.

Hawaii then successfully challenged the government’s definition of which relatives of people already living in the U.S. would be allowed into the country, and Watson ordered the list expanded.

Nonwhites shouldn’t be judges except for their own peoples. This one wants to create chaos, justifying it with that liberal catchall, “inclusion.”

Virtue Signaling White Christian Family Adopts Eight African Kids All at Once

WHEN WILL WHITE MOM, HALEY JONES, BE RAPED BY ONE OF HER COLORED BOYS? LOOK AT THE SIZE OF THE NOG HOLDING THE BALL.

Haley and Mike Jones should be under arrest for actions detrimental to the public safety.

The brought back from Africa eight black as coal Africans, thus putting themselves and their community at risk.

Their own two boys are in sufficient danger that it’s hard to argue with a phone call by a Good Samaritan to Child Protective Services. Those two white innocents are in for some rough times ahead with nutjobs for parents and eight blacks as siblings.

Return of Kings

In a case of virtue signalling on steroids, an American Christian couple have adopted eight children from Sierra Leone in one go, adding to their existing biological family of two children. They made sure to broadcast their charity far and wide, even publishing a book, so that the entire world knows how superior they are to people who do not dedicate their lives to helping non-whites.

A couple have done an extreme ‘Brangelina’ by adopting eight siblings from an African orphanage in one go – the biggest single adoption in history.

Hayley and Mike Jones instantly increased the size of their family from two to ten by adopting the children from Sierra Leone.

The pair wanted a bigger family but were put off having children after both of Hayley’s pregnancies ended with emergency C-sections.

I would also be concerned for my wife’s health if she had two difficult births, but I would look to alternatives such as using a surrogate mother if I desired more children. The first thing on my mind would not be flying to Africa to adopt eight African children without considering how such an addition would affect my two existing children.

When the couple originally looked into adopting they were adamant it would just be one or two children.

But after hearing the names of a number of children who were still waiting to be adopted they decided they should take more.

They were then told about Michael, 16, Samuel, 15, Gabrielle, 12, Levi, 11, Malachi, nine, Judah, eight, Isaiah, seven and Zion, five, and decided they would be the perfect addition.

Mr Jones said: ‘We thought it was about two or three children we’d be adopting when we initially met the orphanage.

‘But God was telling us both separately to keep going for more and more – it was just brought up that there was a sibling group of six and eight.

Did God also tell them to run to the Daily Mail to share the tale? We’ll never know, but at risk of projecting my hyper-sexual worldview onto the couple, I can’t help but notice that the oldest “child” is more athletic, virile, and masculine than the husband.

Is it possible that his mother adopted an alpha male to compensate for her beta male husband? We’ve seen this before with Western European women who cuck their boyfriends by eagerly adopting masculine refugees into their homes.

Since the article mentioned that the wife had an interest in Africa, it’s safe to say that it was her idea to adopt. While we should all be thankful that the African children have a second-chance at life, and I hope they do thrive in America by attending prestigious Ivy League colleges, we can’t avoid the couple’s political intent, which Matthew 6 of the Bible specifically shames.

1 “Be careful not to practice your righteousness in front of others to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven.

2 “So when you give to the needy, do not announce it with trumpets, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be honored by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. 3 But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, 4 so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.”

Forum member Ocelot explains further…

All telescopic philanthropy is virtue signalling: no exceptions. They could have adopted 8 American orphans of any ethnicity of their choosing, and used the resources saved on other charitable ventures.

There’s a reason they chose not to dedicate their resources to helping those closer to home. There’s also a reason they chose not to adopt some passably-white-looking kids orphaned by Islamic militants killing their parents in the middle-East.

It was important that the children both resembled them as little as possible, and were from an area firmly associated in most people’s minds with crushing poverty. Because the act is about them, not about the children. Hell, if you care about the kids so much, why not use your resources to pay someone in their own country to adopt and raise them instead of transplanting them into a foreign land.

It’s also a possibility that the intention is to groom these kids to be sent back to their home country as evangelists of whatever fake-ass McChurchian sect they belong to.

We really have to pressure the Trump administration to ban African adoptions by Americans. It’s criminal on many levels. Black children belong with black families. Black Africans belong in Africa, where they are well adopted to live.

Neocon Jew Max Boot Advocates Mass Invasion of Nonwhites to Man America Military

MAX BOOT.

Steve Sailer exposes the dangerous mindset of a neocon Jew, a Hillary supporter who has a history of influencing American foreign policy.

Excerpt from Lew Rockwell

“The military would do well today to open its ranks not only to legal immigrants but also to illegal ones and, as important, to untold numbers of young men and women who are not here now but would like to come.

No doubt many would be willing to serve for some set period in return for one of the world’s most precious commodities — U.S. citizenship.”

– Max Boot, Feb. 2005, LA Times

Continue reading

Slant Teen “Dr. Kitty” Botched Illegal Plastic Surgery on Woman’s Face, Police Say

JINGYI “KITTY” WANG. SELF-TAUGHT SURGEON.

It’s Canada. Dr. Kitty won’t be deported if she’s convicted.

Toronto Star

Police have arrested a 19-year-old Toronto woman who allegedly offered plastic surgery in an unlicensed basement medical clinic through “discreet” advertising placed in at least one local restaurant.

Jingyi “Kitty” Wang was taken in by the Toronto Police Service on Friday, Oct. 13, and charged with aggravated assault after receiving a complaint from a woman who developed a serious infection after responding to an ad proffering the services of a “Dr. Kitty” and undergoing a cosmetic facial procedure beneath a private home in the Bayview Ave. and Sheppard Ave. E. area. The victim had to seek the services of a licensed plastic surgeon to cure the infection and also required corrective surgery, police say.

The unfortunate patient reportedly underwent a surgical procedure for “face filler,” Toronto police spokesperson Const. Allyson Douglas-Cook said on Sunday evening. The victim has not been identified, but Douglas-Cook said she believes she is a young woman “close in age” to the accused.

The ad touting Dr. Kitty’s services — “very vague in terms of what was being advertised,” but allegedly featuring a barcode that interested parties could scan with a cellphone for more information — was apparently placed in a restaurant in the Yonge and Finch area in April 2017, raising concerns that there might be more of them out there and that more people might have responded.

“Who knows how many other establishments this ad is placed in?” Douglas-Cook said. “It’s quite discreet how it is, so there’s a possibility that there may be others and a very high likelihood that there may have been others who would have responded to this ad and sought the services of this person.”

Wang was arrested Friday after police raided the alleged basement clinic at Bayview and Sheppard E. She appeared in court Saturday. Details on when her next appearance will take place were unavailable on Sunday evening.

You have to suspect the victim in this story is another Asian. Which raises the legit question about how “superior” and smart these people really are.

Plastic surgery in a basement? By a teen?

No thanks.