Migrant Privilege: Germany Confiscating Homes to Give to Illegal Sand Monkeys

Everything for “refugees,” nothing for the German people.

Excerpt from the Gatesstone Institute

Authorities in Hamburg, the second-largest city in Germany, have begun confiscating private dwellings to ease a housing shortage — one that has been acutely exacerbated by Chancellor Angela Merkel’s decision to allow more than two million migrants into the country in recent years.

City officials have been seizing commercial properties and converting them into migrant shelters since late 2015, when Merkel opened German borders to hundreds of thousands of migrants from Africa, Asia and the Middle East. Now, however, the city is expropriating residential property units owned by private citizens.

In an unprecedented move, Hamburg authorities recently confiscated six residential units in the Hamm district near the city center. The units, which are owned by a private landlord, are in need of repair and have been vacant since 2012. A trustee appointed by the city is now renovating the properties and will rent them — against the will of the owner — to tenants chosen by the city. District spokeswoman Sorina Weiland said that all renovation costs will be billed to the owner of the properties.

The expropriation is authorized by the Hamburg Housing Protection Act (Hamburger Wohnraumschutzgesetz), a 1982 law that was updated by the city’s Socialist government in May 2013 to enable the city to seize any residential property unit that has been vacant for more than four months.

The forced lease, the first of its kind in Germany, is said to be aimed at pressuring the owners of other vacant residences in the city to make them available for rent. Of the 700,000 rental units in Hamburg, somewhere between 1,000 and 5,000 (less than one percent) are believed to be vacant, according an estimate by the Hamburg Senate.

The measure was applauded by those on the left of the political spectrum. “We are doing everything we can to ensure that the refugees are not homeless during the coming winter,” said Senator Till Steffen of the Green Party. “For this reason, we need to use vacant commercial properties.”

Others have argued that efforts by the state to seize private property are autocratic and reek of Communism. “The proposed confiscation of private land and buildings is a massive attack on the property rights of the citizens of Hamburg,” said André Trepoll of the center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU). “It amounts to an expropriation by the state.” He said the proposed measure is a “law of intimidation” that amounts to a “political dam-break with far-reaching implications.” He added: “The ends do not justify any and all means.”

The kebab so-called refugees quickly turned into sexual predators once in Germany. And now Frau Merkel is giving them houses which could be used by indigenous Germans. Only a regime change is going to clear the air in a country that is committing national suicide.

Why We Need the Wall (Border Crossing Video)

There’s no fence and no wall and not even a creek to wade across at the spot along the Mexican border featured in this video.

In five minutes, you’ll get a feel for the hot, dry, dusty terrain and the Mexicans who live along that part of the border.

Published on May 8, 2017

In a display of just how lax border security is between Mexico and the United States, Joe Biggs and David Rodriguez traveled to the border between Anapara, Mexico and Sunland Park in New Mexico. This is a report for Borderland Alternative Media

This is Why We Need Trump’s Wall

I was going to post the image results of a Google search related to Mexican violence, but the results were so horrifically repulsive that I couldn’t bring myself to do it to you, the reader. Thus, the photo above is of Mexican guns, not dead and mutilated Mexicans. God only knows how many the arrested Mexicans in the photo killed.

What we do know from what is probably reliable data is that Mexico is one of the deadliest countries on earth. To me, it’s a losing proposition to even think about being an American tourist in Mexico.

Excerpt from Zerohedge

Why can’t brain dead liberals understand the need for a wall after seeing these statistics?

How can we have an unsecured border with a failed third world state, where murder and drugs are the two biggest imports?

* * *

Mexico was second deadliest country in 2016

(CNN) It was the second deadliest conflict in the world last year, but it hardly registered in the international headlines.

As Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan dominated the news agenda, Mexico’s drug wars claimed 23,000 lives during 2016 — second only to Syria, where 50,000 people died as a result of the civil war.

“This is all the more surprising, considering that the conflict deaths [in Mexico] are nearly all attributable to small arms,” said John Chipman, chief executive and director-general of the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), which issued its annual survey of armed conflict on Tuesday.

“The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan claimed 17,000 and 16,000 lives respectively in 2016, although in lethality they were surpassed by conflicts in Mexico and Central America, which have received much less attention from the media and the international community,” said Anastasia Voronkova, the editor of the survey.

Rising death toll
Voronkova said the number of homicides rose in 22 of Mexico’s 32 states during 2016 and the rivalries between cartels increased in violence.

“It is noteworthy that the largest rises in fatalities were registered in states that were key battlegrounds for control between competing, increasingly fragmented cartels,” she said.

“The violence grew worse as the cartels expanded the territorial reach of their campaigns, seeking to ‘cleanse’ areas of rivals in their efforts to secure a monopoly on drug-trafficking routes and other criminal assets.”
Mexican drug cartels take in between $19 billion and $29 billion annually from US drug sales, according to the Department of Homeland Security.

Rivalries between the cartels wreak havoc on the lives of civilians who have nothing to do with narcotics. Bystanders, people who refused to join cartels, migrants, journalists and government officials have all been killed.

Not on news agenda
Jacob Parakilas, assistant head of the US and the Americas Programme at London-based think tank Chatham House, said part of the reason for the relative lack of attention paid to Mexico in the international media is “it’s not a war in the political sense of the word. The participants largely don’t have a political objective. They’re not trying to create a breakaway state. It doesn’t come with the same visuals. There are no air strikes.

“Also this has been going on since the beginning of the modern drug trade in the Americas. It’s not news in that sense. And Mexico is one of the most dangerous countries in the world to be a journalist. They are intentionally targeted in Mexico, which puts a dampener on the ability to report on this.”

ICE Makes an Arrest at the Denver COURTHOUSE! (Video)

Hysterical Mexican women screaming nonsense and a wetback fighting ICE. What more could anyone ask for? Published on youtube May 9, 2017.

Continuation:

Video 3 of 3:

Texas governor signs law banning sanctuary cities, wetbacks revolt

TEXAS GOVERNOR GREG ABBOTT IS A CRIPPLE.

Texas Governor Greg Abbott pulled a fast one on Sunday, signing SB4, the bill that outlaws sanctuary cities in Texas on Facebook live. He was expected to sign the bill later in the week.

Reaction from the usual suspects was swift: anger.

An all-night protest is taking place in Austin outside the capital.

The leftists who want to destroy what’s left of the United States call it the “Show me your papers” bill evoking images of Nazi Germany under Hitler. Come to think of it, why wouldn’t it be common sense to say to a driver pulled over for a traffic infraction to show his driver’s license.

If the country were not being invaded by millions of people hostile to American values, there would be no reason for anyone to “show” his “papers,” whatever the hell that means.

Fox News

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott signed a bill Sunday prohibiting the state’s cities and counties from enacting so-called “sanctuary” laws that prevent local law enforcement officers from inquiring about the immigration status of anyone they detain.

Abbott took the unusual step of signing the bill on Facebook with no advanced public notice. He said Texas residents expect lawmakers to “keep us safe” and said similar laws have already been tested in federal court, where opponents have already been hinting the bill will be immediately challenged.

“Let’s face it, the reason why so many people come to America is because we are a nation of laws and Texas is doing its part to keep it that way,” Abbott said.

SANCTUARY CITIES BILL PUTS TEXAS COUNTY IN TIGHT SPOT

The timing of the signing caught Democratic lawmakers flatfooted. Democratic state Rep. Cesar Blanco said it looked like Abbott “wanted to get ahead” of any protests surrounding the bill signing. Abbott spokesman John Wittman said they chose to sign the bill on a Facebook livestream because that’s “where most people are getting their news nowadays.”

Protests over the bill have been intense for months and about 20 people were charged with criminal trespassing last week after staging a daylong sit-in at a state building where some of Abbott’s staff works. One Democratic state representative embarked on a three-day hunger strike in protest.

Teri Burke, executive director of the ACLU of Texas, said “we will fight this assault in the court” and the ballot box. Abbott said key provisions of the bill had already been tested at the U.S. Supreme Court, which struck down several components of Arizona’s law but allowed the provision permitting police to ask about immigration status.

Republicans say the bill is needed to ensure local jails honor requests from federal officials to keep dangerous offenders behind bars.

TEXAS, CALIFORNIA TAKE VERY DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO ‘SANCTUARY CITY’ DEBATE

The bill allows police to inquire about the immigration status of anyone they detain, a situation that can range from arrest for a crime to being stopped for a traffic violation. It also requires local officials to comply with federal requests to hold criminal suspects for possible deportation.

One of the bill’s most controversial provisions allows for criminal charges against city or county officials who intentionally refuse to comply with federal authorities’ attempt to deport people in the country illegally who already have been jailed on offenses unrelated to immigration. Elected officials could face up to a year in jail and lose their posts if convicted of official misconduct.
Opponents blasted the Texas bill as a version of Arizona’s immigration crackdown law, SB 1070, which launched protests, lawsuits and national controversy in 2010. The Arizona law went to the U.S. Supreme court, which voided much of the measure but allowed the provision permitting police to ask about immigration status.
But the Texas and Arizona bills are not identical. Whereas the Arizona law required police to try to determine the immigration status of people during routine stops, the Texas bill doesn’t instruct officers to ask. But it does allow Texas police to inquire whether a person is in the country legally, even if they’re not under arrest.

Every major police chief in Texas opposed the bill. Thomas Saenz, president of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, said millions in the nation’s second most populous state will now be subjected to racial profiling and suggested that worried Hispanic residents will now be less willing to cooperate with police investigations.

“Given the size of the state, this may well be the most costly gubernatorial signature in all of United States history,” Saenz said.

Some Democrats said the timing of the signing particularly stung after three recent federal court rulings that found intentional discrimination in Republican-passed voting laws.
“They did not connect the history of our culture or how closely that it is tied to Mexico,” Democratic state. Rep. Eddie Rodriguez said. “It’s just extremely personal. There is a lot of disconnect. They don’t really see this as affecting people.”

Texas doesn’t currently have any cities which have formally declared themselves sanctuaries for immigrants.

But Sally Hernandez, the sheriff of Travis County, which includes liberal Austin, enraged conservatives by refusing to honor federal detainer requests if the suspects weren’t arrested for immigration offenses or serious crimes such as murder. Hernandez softened her policy after Abbott cut funding to the county, saying decisions would be made on a case-by-case basis. She has said she will conform to the state’s ban if it becomes law.

Illegals can be heard all they want to be heard. Tell us amigos, why can’t your homeland provide for you? Why do you come to the US and steal jobs, and literally commit rape, murder, robbery and every other other crime on our books. Is it because your homeland is a turd world shithole? Tell us, amigos.

Prosecutors Drop Rape Charges Against Illegal Immigrant Teens in High Profile School Rape Case

HENRY SANCHEZ-MILLIAN.

This post offers breaking news on the rape of a 14 year old white girl reported on Saboteur365 on March 26. One of the points I made in that post was that the public schools have no business putting young American girls at risk since Latino males are often unable to distinguish rape from consensual sex. One of the local Latin lovers I used to know would say, “She’s talking to me, she wants to f*** me.” Even when a girl was saying, “Get away from me,” he took it to mean that she wanted to have sex with his greasy ****.

Against this backdrop, prosecutors have dropped rape charges against two illegal students in Maryland.

That’s ridiculous. You put the alleged perps on trial in a case like this one and do your best to convict them. The prosecution isn’t claiming the victim is a hoaxer. They just don’t want to go to trial.

Legal Insurrection

Back in March, two illegal alien teens were charged with raping and sodomizing a 14-year-old girl in a high school bathroom. After conducting an investigation into the case, prosecutors have dropped rape charges against the illegals; they are still facing child porn charges, however.

Continue reading

Lost girl, 16, is ‘gang-raped by four laughing men above kebab shop after she asked them for directions’

Nasty Muslim males have claimed another rape victim in Britain.

The ethnicity of the female victim has not been revealed by the press, but the chances are excellent that she was an indigenous European, i.e., a white girl.

Given her age and the viciousness of the crime, the sand niggers on trial for her rape ought to do 20 years at hard labor and then be deported.

But in the past British justice has proven to be lenient on Muslims since they always claim that the girl consented or that in their culture it’s not a crime.

mirror.co.uk

A court heard how the girl was taken to a “grubby room” above a takeaway in Kent where she was pushed onto a mattress and repeatedly raped by multiple men

A lost teenage girl was gang-raped by four laughing strangers after she asked them for directions, a court heard.

The 16-year-old was taken to a room above a kebab and pizza fast food shop where they pushed her onto a mattress in a”grubby room, ” it is claimed.

The men then carried out multiple rapes “and laughed as they put her through the ordeal,” a jury was told.

The girl, who had been drinking, was attacked after she headed home after a night out with friends when she stopped at the restaurant in Ramsgate, Kent, to find her way home, Canterbury Crown Court heard.

Prosecutor Simon Taylor said: “The girl was undoubtedly drunk and was walking the streets alone late at night.

“The Crown’s case is that her drunkenness, youth and vulnerability would have been recognised by the defendants.

“And it was these factors that they took advantage of in the couple of hours that followed.”

Restaurant owner Tamin Rahani, 37, Shershah Muslimyar, 20, Rafiullah Hamidy, 24, and a teenager who cannot be named for legal reasons, all deny three charges of rape.

RAFIULLAH HAMIDY.

Mr Taylor said the girl was taken to Rahani’s flat above the restaurant and added: “Once there she was raped by men on multiple occasions.

“Through drink, and most likely the trauma of what happened to her, she was unable to provide any detailed descriptions.

“The girl had found herself in a room of the second floor above a takeaway.

“In that grubby room, with an uncovered mattress on the floor, multiple males had sex with the teenager.

“She says that she did not consent.

“Indeed, you may well conclude that she was too drunk to give any true consent to any sexual intercourse in any event.

“But what is clear is that each of the men took the opportunity to have a little ‘fun’ at her expense.”

Mr Taylor said the teenager had drunk alcohol which was the equivalent of being twice over the drink-drive limit.

After the alleged attacks, Mr Taylor claims she was “escorted” out of the property by one of the men “and left to roam the streets alone”.

The girl was found “sobbing and distressed” by a woman returning home and taken into her home for safety.

The trial continues.

The criminality of Muslims is built in. There’s probably not a single trustworthy Muslim in all of Britain. The British people, the native peoples, are obviously fed up with their politicians who can’t seem to stop the flow of rag heads into the country.

If Brexit doesn’t stop the colonization of the country, then the next step has to be revolution.

If you find the youtube video informative, please share it. It’s only five minutes and it’s put together with some good insights.