Hillary voters turn on Bill Clinton

THEY WANTED IT …

THEY DIDN’T.

The drawback to the current moral panic over men sexually harassing women, or in the case of Bill Clinton, allegedly raping them, is that it likely encourages false allegations by publicity hounds of exaggerated ones by sincere women who want people to feel sorry for them.

For the moment at least, the heat is on Bill Clinton rather than Roy Moore, the poster boy du jour for alleged naughty behavior.

Washington Times

A majority of Hillary Clinton voters say the sexual misconduct accusations against Bill Clinton are “credible,” according to a new poll.

The Huffington Post/YouGov survey released on Wednesday found 53 percent of those who voted for the former first lady believe the allegations against her husband have merit. Eleven percent say the accusations are “not credible,” and 36 percent are not sure or need more information.

Among President Trump’s base, 84 percent say the accusations against Mr. Clinton are valid, while 4 percent say they are not.

Overall, 57 percent of the country say the accusations against the 42nd president are credible, compared to 8 percent who say they are not.

The poll does not single out a specific accusation against Mr. Clinton for scrutiny. It merely asks participants whether these “assertions generally are credible or are not credible?”

Overall, 57 percent of the country say the accusations against the 42nd president are credible, compared to 8 percent who say they are not.

The poll does not single out a specific accusation against Mr. Clinton for scrutiny. It merely asks participants whether these “assertions generally are credible or are not credible?”

Juanita Broaddrick accused Mr. Clinton of raping her in 1978.

Kathleen Willey, a former White House aide, said Mr. Clinton groped her in his office in 1993. Mr. Clinton has denied both of those allegations.

Paula Jones, a former Arkansas state employee, asserted that while Mr. Clinton was governor in 1991, he propositioned her for sex and exposed himself. The former president settled a lawsuit with Ms. Jones in 1998 for $850,000 with no admission of guilt.

Several women have also accused Mr. Clinton of engaging in extramarital affairs―most notably Monica Lewinsky, the former White House intern at the center of the effort to impeach Mr. Clinton for perjury.

The poll comes as several prominent Democrats have come to acknowledge Mr. Clinton’s transgressions in the wake of the allegations against Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein.

MSNBC host Chris Hayes tweeted on Friday: “As gross and cynical and hypocritical as the right’s ‘what about Bill Clinton‘ stuff is, it’s also true that Democrats and the center left are overdue for a real reckoning with the allegations against him.”

Whether one believes allegations of sexual misconduct against Mr. Trump, however, is still largely dependent on politics.

Eighty-three percent of Hillary voters say the sex allegations against Mr. Trump are “credible,” compared to 6 percent of Trump voters who say the same.

A similar split exists when it comes to former Fox News personality Bill O’Reilly, who was ousted from the network earlier this year amid reports that he racked up millions of dollars to settle sexual harassment lawsuits. Just 18 percent of Trump voters said those allegations have merit, compared to 76 percent of Hillary voters.

Both sides agree that the accusations against Mr. Weinstein are credible. Eighty-one percent of Hillary voters and 74 percent of Trump voters say the wide-ranging allegations against the Hollywood producer are believable.

The Huffington Post/YouGov poll surveyed 1,000 respondents from Oct. 27 to 28. It has a margin of error of 3.8 percent.

Maybe both Democrats and Republicans can come together to make sure (((Harvey))) is put on trial for the alleged rape he committed.

I wonder if all those women teachers who have sex with their students will learn a lesson from all this?

Nah!

Harvey Weinstein’s Army of Spies Included ex-Mossad Agents to Get Dirt on Accusers: Report

Oy vey!

What’s a poor persecuted Jew to do when the goyim get on to his sexual degeneracy!

Journalists have been digging around into Harvey’s affairs. What is revealed is how rich, powerful Jews operate. In a nutshell, they have no decency about them.

The Guardian

Harvey Weinstein allegedly hired an “army of spies”, including former Mossad agents, in an attempt to stop accusers from going public with sexual misconduct claims against him, according to a report in the New Yorker.

Among the private security agencies hired by Weinstein starting around autumn 2016, the magazine claims, was Black Cube, which is largely run by former officers of Israeli intelligence agencies, including Mossad. Another was corporate intelligence giant Kroll.

The report, published on 6 November, alleges that two Black Cube investigators met with actor Rose McGowan, who later publicly accused Weinstein of sexual rape, to obtain information.

Weinstein “unequivocally denies” all claims of non-consensual sex, a spokesperson for the producer says.

The New Yorker also claims that one of the investigators secretly recorded at least four meetings with McGowan while pretending to be a women’s rights advocates, citing dozens of pages of documents and seven people directly involved in Weinstein’s efforts.

The investigator reportedly used a different fake identity to meet a New York magazine journalist who was investigating allegations made against Weinstein. She also allegedly attempted to broker a meeting with Ronan Farrow, the New Yorker journalist who reported 13 claims of abuse made against Weinstein last month, and also wrote the 6 November investigation.

Weinstein and the private investigators also used journalists to extract details from women who were making claims against the film producer, according to the magazine.

During his yearlong effort, Weinstein and his team are accused of collecting information on dozens of people, compiling psychological profiles with their personal or sexual histories in order to contradict, discredit or intimidate his targets.

The New Yorker reports that Weinstein sought the assistance of ex-employees from his movie enterprises to help collect names and place calls. Investigations also allegedly sometimes went through Weinstein’s lawyers. Among them, the New Yorker claims, was David Boies, who represented Al Gore in his 2000 presidential election dispute with George W Bush.

The New Yorker claims Boies had signed a contract demanding that Black Cube seek to uncover information to stop the publication of a New York Times story about Weinstein’s sexual abuse when his firm was also representing the Times in a libel case. Boies told the magazine “it was a mistake” to have been involved with the investigators.

Weinstein’s spokeswoman Sallie Hofmeister dismissed the report, saying: “It is a fiction to suggest that any individuals were targeted or suppressed at any time.”

Let’s pick up the story with some insights into Black Cube, staffed by ex-Mossad agents, from the New Yorker

Last fall, Weinstein began mentioning Black Cube by name in conversations with his associates and attorneys. The agency had made a name for itself digging up information for companies in Israel, Europe, and the U.S. that led to successful legal judgments against business rivals. But the firm has also faced legal questions about its employees’ use of fake identities and other tactics. Last year, two of its investigators were arrested in Romania on hacking charges. In the end, the company reached an agreement with the Romanian authorities, under which the operatives admitted to hacking and were released. Two sources familiar with the agency defended its decision to work for Weinstein, saying that they originally believed that the assignment focussed on his business rivals. But even the earliest lists of names that Weinstein provided to Black Cube included actresses and journalists.

Bullying, cheating, lying, intimidation–these are all tactics from the Jew’s playbook. These values are incompatible with the values of Western civilization. Is it any wonder that Hitler felt that for Germany to prosper, it’s Jews needed to be expelled.

New York Police Moving Closer to Harvey Weinstein Rape Arrest

PAZ DE LA LHUERTA. LOOKS LIKE A TRANNY.

We should all be demanding that Harvey be arrested. Maybe there’ll be a change.org petition we can sign.

Ditto Kevin Spacey.

It’s not so much that the victims are in general worthy of sympathy from the alt-right, but that Harvey’s arrogance deserves serious punishment.

Maybe, if offered a plea deal, he’ll implicate more Hollywood trash in illegal behavior.

Mannish looking actress Paz de la Huerta claims Harvey raped her. Maybe he was feeling a little homo that night. Where do these ugly actresses of today come from? Ugh!

The Independent

The New York Police Department (NYPD) have said they are investigating a “credible” rape allegation against disgraced Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein.

The force’s chief of detectives, Robert Boyce, said they were working with New York’s attorney general to gather enough evidence before obtaining an arrest warrant.

His comments came after he was asked about a claim made by former Boardwalk Empire star Paz De La Huerta that Weinstein raped her in 2010.

NYPD investigating claims Harvey Weinstein raped actor twice in 2010
Lana Del Rey retires song ‘Cola’ over Harvey Weinstein scandal
UK sex assault inquiry into Harvey Weinstein broadens
Vanity Fair magazine reported that she gave her account to the publication over the phone.

Mr Boyce said the actress came to authorities with allegations that Mr Weinstein raped her last week.

He said she had “a credible and detailed narrative” and investigators “found corroboration” of her claims.

The actress had the “ability to articulate each and every movement of the crime – where she was, where they met, where this happened and what he did”, he added.

“We have an actual case here,” he said. “We’re happy with where the investigation is right now.”

Officers were continuing to gather evidence, he added.

Police officers would need to secure a warrant to arrest Mr Weinstein and Mr Boyce said that the case was complicated by the facts that Mr Weinstein lives in another state and that the alleged crime occurred in 2010.

But he said that if the producer “was still in New York and it was recent, we would go right away and make the arrest – no doubt.”

n an interview with CBS news, Ms de la Huerta alleged that Mr Weinstein raped her twice in 2010. She described one alleged incident as occurring after Mr Weinstein drove her home from a party and said the second alleged rape occurred after he drove to her apartment, and she was too drunk to consent.

Mr Weinstein’s representative Sallie Hofmeister did not immediately respond to questions about Ms de la Paz’s claims and the NYPD’s characterisation of her case.

Mr Weinstein has faced a torrent of sexual harassment accusations in recent months, but this would be the first time he has been charged as a result. The Los Angeles Police Department confirmed last month it was investigating a separate sexual assault allegations against Mr Weinstein.

Dozens of women have accused Mr Weinstein of harassment or rape, allegations that cost the mogul his position with the Weinstein Company. Mr Weinstein has denied that non-consensual sex occurred.

Charge him. We’ll applaud.

Masturbating Jew Journalist Mark Halperin Apologizes to Women He “mistreated”

I ran into a woman yesterday who is a fan of Jewish journalist Mark Halperin. We briefly mentioned his troubles with women accusers. I had a wild idea of telling her that he’s a Jew and that both he and Harvey Weinstein, whom she mentioned, are both Jews acting out their Jewish supremacy mind script.

It didn’t seem the right time or place to bring up Jewish hatred mixed with sexual attraction to shiksas, so I remained silent about his ethnicity.

Uproxx

While news of the Trump-Russia investigation’s first indictments made the rounds on Friday, political journalist Mark Halperin issued a statement of apology to his many accusers on Twitter. The NBC News political analyst, who until recently frequently guested on MSNBC’s popular Morning Joe program, is accused of sexually harassing several women during his time at ABC News. While his initial accusers numbered five, CNN reports at least a dozen women have alleged Halperin said or did sexually inappropriate things during their time together.

“I am profoundly sorry for the pain and anguish I have caused by my past actions. I apologize sincerely to the women I mistreated,” Halperin wrote before briefly changing the subject. Despite noting the “inappropriate” behavior of men toward women in these general terms, he did return the focus to his own misdeeds. “Toward the end of my time at ABC News, I recognized that I had a problem. I acknowledge that, and I deeply regret it. As I said earlier this week, my behavior was wrong. It caused fear and anxiety for women who were only seeking to do their jobs.”

Weirdly enough, Halperin somewhat echoed viral comments of his about the many women who accused then-Republican nominee Donald Trump of sexual harassment or assault.

“No one had sued me, no one had filed a human resources complaint against me, no colleague had confronted me,” he wrote in his statement. (“There’s nothing illegal,” he said in May 2016. “There’s nothing even kind of like beyond boorish or politically incorrect.”) Despite the odd discrepancy, Halperin subsequently admitted he “didn’t need a call from HR to know that I was a selfish, immature person, who was behaving in a manner that had to stop.”

Read the full statement below

NBC News offers a discreet in-depth look at the accusations. You’d never quite figure out what the hell Halperin was up to from most news accounts. It looks like a case of other Jewish journalists protecting one of their own.

However, Jewish owned and edited Business Insider pulls back the curtain a ways.

Halperin, who was dismissed from his roles at NBC and MSNBC this week after the sexual harassment claims first surfaced, was accused of the lewd acts from women who worked with him at ABC News.

One of the four new claims reported on Friday by CNN’s Oliver Darcy included one accuser who worked as an ABC News desk assistant in the late 1990s. The accuser, who CNN reported was her early 20s at the time, asked to meet with Halperin for career advice and went into his office after 10 p.m. While the two were talking, she told CNN, Halperin began masturbating behind his wooden desk while he stared at her.

“I sat in a chair across from him,” she said to CNN. “He was behind a wooden desk so I couldn’t see him from the waist down. As we had our conversation about my career he was masturbating. There was no question about it.”

“I pretended like I didn’t know what was going on and we talked a bit more and then he abruptly wrapped up the conversation,” she continued.

Her account, like others, was corroborated by friends who said they were told of the allegations years ago.

Another woman alleged that Halperin had violently thrown her against the window of a restaurant before coming “at me with his open mouth.”

“He put both hands on my arms and threw me against the window of the restaurant hard,” she said to CNN. “So my head banged against the window hard, in a way I thought people inside were going to think something terrible had happened to me.”

“This was rough, and hard, and violent,” she continued. “And not in a seductive way — in a way that telegraphs some anger and meanness.”

Although the woman said she avoided his attempt to kiss her, she said that about 10 minutes later, Halperin gave her a call.

“I was really hoping he would be calling to apologize,” she told CNN. “And he said something to the effect of, ‘You are never going to get a job. You’re never going to be hired in politics or media. Why would anyone ever hire you?'”

“And that’s when I broke down and started crying,” she continued.

CNN reported that Halperin denied some of the latest allegations, saying he had never masturbated in front of anyone or physically assaulted anyone. He released a statement on Friday to “apologize sincerely to the women [he] mistreated.”

You don’t have to be antisemitic to believe that there’s something wrong when Jews are solidly overrepresented in the current moral panic over sexual harassment. Yes, Bill O’Reilly is not a Jew and neither is Bill Cosby, but for Jews being less than 2 percent of the population, they sure are the stars of this sh*tshow.

Chelsea Clinton runs from questions about handing back Harvey Weinstein’s $250,000 donations

CHECK OUT THE EYE BAGS.

The greed is shocking even for the Clintons.

They are worth over $100 million and yet they are waffling over the return of Harvey Weinstein’s money or the donation of those dollars to a real charity. The sum of $250,000 would be small potatoes to them. But when they left the White House in 2001 they allegedly took the silverware, dishes, and other government property, so greed is nothing new to them.

They’re garbage.

Excerpt from the Daily Mail

Chelsea Clinton fled to her car to avoid answering questions from a DailyMail.com reporter on Saturday about whether the Clinton Foundation will return up to $250,000 in donations from accused rapist Harvey Weinstein.

The former first daughter, who is a board member of the Clinton Foundation, ran from questions while she was attending a Clinton Global Initiative University event in Northeastern University in Boston.

The night before, Clinton Foundation press officials blocked a DailyMail.com reporter attempting to approach Bill Clinton to ask him questions at a public event.

A number of Democratic politicians and groups, including the University of Southern California, have said they will return donations from Weinstein after he was accused of sexual assault, harassment or rape by over two dozen women.

Hillary Clinton said earlier this week she would return Weinstein’s donations to her 2016 campaign. The disgraced movie producer gave over $30,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund and $5,400 to Hillary for America.

But the Clinton Foundation has declined to comment on whether it will return Weinstein’s donations. Weinstein has given between $100,000 and $250,000 to the foundation, according to its records.

The Foundation declines to come clean on how much individual donors give.

‘Chelsea, will the foundation give back the donations from Harvey Weinstein?’ a DailyMail.com reporter asked Chelsea as she left a CGI lunch event through a side door on Saturday. ‘Do you plan to return the $100,000?’

Chelsea, flanked by Clinton Foundation officials, looked straight ahead and ignored the questions as she scurried through the side lot and ducked into her waiting black sedan. Security blocked the reporter from approaching her car.

Readers at the Daily Mail don’t like the Clintons. The comments are pretty funny. Truckerbear 1942 has it figured out:

The Clintonsare an horrendous family just out to get what they can and I am sure that whilst they might say they will return donations, in fact will merely channel them to their own use under a dfifferent name.

Hillary Clinton calls Trump ‘sexual assaulter’ in BBC interview, but says Bill’s behavior ‘in the past’

Perhaps the worst thing about Bill Clinton is that he introduced Hillary to the world’s political stage. And once she had the soapbox, she never shut up.

A smart woman would go away. The love of being in the spotlight is just too strong for her.

Be thankful she is not president and unlikely to ever be president.

Fox News

Hillary Clinton moved to take the heat off Harvey Weinstein Friday by outright calling President Trump a “sexual assaulter” – while roundly dismissing past allegations of sexual impropriety against her husband as old news.

Clinton made the comments during an interview with BBC’s Andrew Marr, who asked about the allegations of sexual assault made against Democratic mega-donor and Hollywood producer Weinstein.

“This kind of behavior cannot be tolerated anywhere, whether it’s in entertainment, politics,” Clinton said. “After all, we have someone admitting to being a sexual assaulter in the Oval Office.”

Marr responded by pointing out Clinton has dismissed allegations made by women against her husband, former President Bill Clinton, that Trump highlighted during the hard-fought presidential campaign.

“That has all been litigated,” Clinton replied. “That was subject of a huge investigation in the late ’90s and there were conclusions drawn. That was clearly in the past.”

Clinton, in her accusation against Trump, was referring to the infamous “Access Hollywood” tape of Trump in 2005 in which he said he can “do anything” to women as a star, including grabbing “them by the p—-.” Trump later apologized for his comments and called it “locker room talk” but has never admitted to sexual assault.

After the video surfaced in October 2016, Trump held a press conference with Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey and Juanita Broaddrick, who had all accused Bill Clinton of sexual misconduct in the past.

In the latest interview, Clinton expressed disappointment the “Access Hollywood” tape didn’t sink Trump in the campaign.

“The really sad part of the campaign was how this horrific tape, what he said about women in the past, what he said about women during the campaign, was discounted by a lot of voters,” she said.

Clinton, who is on a tour promoting her memoir about the campaign, also said she was “really shocked and appalled” at the recent revelations about Weinstein.

“He’s been a supporter — he’s been a funder for all of us, for Obama, for me, for people who have run for office in the United States,” she said. “So it was just disgusting and the stories that have come out are heartbreaking. And I really commend the women who have been willing to step forward now and tell their stories.”

Weinstein has raised thousands for the Clintons.

A White House spokesman did not return a request for comment.

But earlier this week, White House Counselor Kellyanne Conway called Clinton a “hypocrite” on women’s issues.

“She needs to not be a hypocrite about women’s empowerment and what it means to be pro-woman,” Conway told Fox News’ “America’s Newsroom.” “She is on a book tour talking about herself and a campaign she lost—not talking about women’s empowerment, she’s not trying to help victims of sexual assault.”

Conway also blasted Clinton for taking five days to release a statement condemning Weinstein: “I felt like a woman who ran to be commander-in-chief and president of the United States, who talks about women’s empowerment, took an awfully long time to give support to these women.”

Contra to what Hillary says, the public didn’t so much dismiss the (paid for false) allegations against Trump as recognize Hillary’s hypocrisy and find it worse than Trump’s locker room “boy talk.”

Hillary would have been wise to quickly condemn Harvey and then shut up about Trump. But no …

Harvey Weinstein expelled from motion picture academy

At least some of the pukes who gave the boot to Harvey knew exactly what he had been doing and said nothing.

These hypocrites do not deserve a break. Let (((Hollywood))) continue to devour more of its own.

We see how quickly Jews will turn on their fellow Jews when the chips are down and shekels are at stake.

Excerpt from Los Angeles Times

mbattled film mogul Harvey Weinstein — a once-dominant force in the Academy Awards who rewrote the rules of Oscar campaigning — has been expelled from the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences in response to mounting allegations of sexual harassment and assault against him.

The film academy’s 54-member board of governors, which includes such industry luminaries as Steven Spielberg, Tom Hanks, Kathleen Kennedy and Whoopi Goldberg, voted in an emergency meeting on Saturday morning to remove Weinstein from the organization’s ranks in an unprecedented public rebuke of a prominent industry figure. The move marked the latest blow in Weinstein’s stunning downfall and, in symbolic terms, amounts to a virtual expulsion from Hollywood itself.

In removing Weinstein from its ranks, the academy said in a statement, “We do so not simply to separate ourselves from someone who does not merit the respect of his colleagues but also to send a message that the era of willful ignorance and shameful complicity in sexually predatory behavior and workplace harassment in our industry is over. What’s at issue here is a deeply troubling problem that has no place in our society. The Board continues to work to establish ethical standards of conduct that all Academy members will be expected to exemplify.”

Since reports of Weinstein’s alleged misconduct toward dozens of women first surfaced in the New York Times on Oct. 5, the academy had been under increasing pressure to take action against him. On Tuesday, the National Organization for Women publicly called for Weinstein’s removal, stating, “A sexual predator doesn’t deserve the privilege of an academy membership — and all the opportunities to wield outsize power that come with it.”

Don’t give the Clintons and other high profile Democrats a pass either.

Twenty-one members of the film academy’s board are women — as is its chief executive, Dawn Hudson — and in recent years the organization has taken steps to dramatically increase the number of women in its historically overwhelmingly male ranks.

In the past several days, a number of academy members expressed their feelings both privately and publicly that Weinstein had no place in the film industry’s most prestigious organization. CBS Films President Terry Press, who regularly battled Weinstein on the awards trail during her tenure as a marketing executive at DreamWorks, vowed in a Facebook post to quit the academy if he was allowed to remain. “The idea that anyone would give him a second chance or entertain the notion that he can change is beyond absurd,” wrote Press.

Even Weinstein’s brother, Bob — with whom he ran Miramax Films and then Weinstein Co. — said in an interview published Saturday in the Hollywood Reporter that he felt the academy should expel him, adding that he planned to write a note to the group to that effect.

But within the academy some wrestled with the decision, fearing that it could set a precedent that would require the academy to police its members’ behavior going forward. As many have pointed out in recent days, other Hollywood figures who have come under attack for their treatment of women — including Bill Cosby, Roman Polanski and Mel Gibson — remain members of the academy in good standing.

The academy’s bylaws give the board of governors free rein to expel members “for cause,” but that power has very rarely been exercised. The last member to be banished from the group was actor Carmine Caridi, who was booted in 2004 for sharing promotional copies of films that were later pirated. Sources close to the academy say that other members had been more quietly suspended in years past for selling their tickets to the Oscars ceremony, but nothing ever rose to the level of attention surrounding Weinstein.

You see the problem:

It’s time to clean house.

As Trump would say, “Drain the swamp.”