Trump mocks Pence for wanting ‘to hang’ all gay people

Trump mocks Pence, says The New Yorker in a story picked up by the Post.

This article is going to merit a Trump Tweetstorm if it gains some staying power, like some of the stories about Trump and Tillerson. Picture Trump’s Tweets that would go along these lines: “Lies! Our great Vice President is doing a wonderful job. Fake news media is failing fast. Sad. Ignore.”

Even if the bare bones of the following story are true, there’s probably a lot of exaggeration.

No source for the claims made are offered.

New York Post

President Trump routinely mocks Vice President Pence’s staunch Christian faith and once joked that there was no point in asking him about gay rights because “he wants to hang them all,” The New Yorker reported.

In a wide-ranging profile of Pence, the magazine pointed out that Trump likes to make sure his vice president is always aware of “who’s boss.”

During a discussion about gay rights, Trump motioned to Pence and said: “Don’t ask that guy – he wants to hang them all!”

Pence, who was raised a Catholic but later became an evangelical Christian with his wife Karen, is often the butt of Trump’s jokes.

When people meet with the president after stopping by Pence’s office, he will ask, “Did Mike make you pray?”

And during a meeting with a legal scholar, Trump trivialized Pence’s determination to overturn Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion.

The adviser told them that if Roe v. Wade was overturned, many states would probably legalize abortion on their own.

‘You see?” Trump asked Pence. “You’ve wasted all this time and energy on it, and it’s not going to end abortion anyway.”

Trump sometimes comes across as mean, but the base doesn’t care so long as progress is being made in building the wall and discouraging immigration.

It’s pathetic that reporters are wasting their time on this trivia instead of flying to Las Vegas to investigate the suspicious contradictions that immediately appeared in the official story.

Reporters are nothing but gossip mongers today.

Canadian Police Expose Hoax in case of Nonwhite Woman Who Claimed Racist Death Threats Against Her

NIMRA AMJAD. RUNNING FOR SCHOOL BOARD. PROBABLE ANTI-WHITE HOAXER.

A white man was fired from his job after Nimra Amjad, pictured above, accused him of making racist threats toward her.

The only thing is that it appears she successfully perpetrated a hoax.

The repulsive Canadian police should be arresting her sorry a**, but instead are letting the matter drop.

Read the story and you’ll see why having a Facebook account is a bad idea.

CBC.ca

Police drop investigation as story of racist death threats against Calgary trustee candidate unravels

A Facebook account posted threats against Nimra Amjad in August, but it appears the wrong person was blamed

The man whose name and photo were connected to online racist death threats against a Calgary school board trustee candidate says not only did he not do it, but he dated the woman he’s accused of targeting.

Now, Calgary police confirm their hate crimes unit is no longer investigating the comments Shawn Street allegedly made to Ward 3 and 4 school trustee candidate Nimra Amjad back in August.

“I did not do this, I had nothing to do with this in any way shape or form,” said Street, who was fired from his job following the media attention and public outrage around the story.

Street says he was told by Calgary police that Amjad was uncooperative with their investigation, refusing to provide a statement and failing to return the investigator’s phone calls.

Police wouldn’t go that far, but did say when the investigator asked Amjad for further information, it “was not immediately provided and the complaint was then withdrawn.”

“Investigators are respecting the wishes of the complainant and the case has now been closed,” said CPS in a written statement.

An email chain forwarded to CBC News by Amjad shows the lead investigator, Cst. Craig Collins growing impatient with the alleged victim.

The day after she cancelled a meeting with him 20 minutes before it was supposed to take place, Collins tells Amjad that he has “spent a considerable amount of time and effort in conducting this investigation, which the Calgary Police Service takes very seriously.”

“I note that you have utilized the media in regard to this incident …This investigation is reaching Day 6, and you have not provided any formal statement to the police, despite numerous attempts by the police to obtain your statement.”

Amjad’s story changes

In an interview with CBC News, Amjad changed her story numerous times.

Continue reading

Pentagon Drops SPLC from Training Materials

The SPLC is going to be taking a hit to its bottom line. It’s “educational” materials are biased against conservatives. It’s main mission, besides spreading hatred of white people, is raising money. Thanks to wise heads in the Pentagon, one source of taxpayer dollars is being cut off.

Daily Caller via archive.is

The Pentagon has officially severed all ties to the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) after previously relying on the group’s training materials on extremism.

Brian J. Field, assistant U.S. attorney from the Civil Division, stated that the Department of Defense (DOD) Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity removed any and all references to the SPLC in training materials used by the Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute (DEOMI), in an email obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation from the Department of Justice.

The DEOMI is a DOD school founded to fight segregation and inequality that teaches courses in racial, gender and religious equality, among other subject areas like equal opportunity and pluralism. The courses are available to DOD civilians and service members.

As part of a response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request from the Immigration Reform Law Institute, Field wrote in the email sent in late September:

Additionally, the DEOMI office informed me that, based on a previous FOIA request, DEOMI records concerning, regarding, or related to the preparation and presentation of training materials on hate groups or hate crimes were forwarded … That 133-page document did reference the SPLC; however, based upon guidance from the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity, all references to the SPLC have been removed from any current training.

Interestingly, DEOMI still makes use of materials on “Hate Symbols” from the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a group similar to the SPLC. Students at DEOMI use the Hate Symbols reference on the ADL site to “learn more about gang colors or clothing; hate group tattoos and body markings associated with such gangs.”

As a matter of policy, the DOD does not have an official list of hate groups.

In early 2014, the Pentagon told CNS News that while it would remove information on hate groups provided by the SPLC, it would continue to rely on SPLC data in “non-federal reference material” for DEOMI. It appears that the DOD’s DEOMI has now decided to sever ties with the SPLC, as DEOMI is the only sub-branch of the Pentagon with any records of SPLC materials.

The Pentagon’s decision to terminate its relationship with the SPLC comes at a time when the group has under major fire from conservative organizations, particularly in the form of lawsuits. D. James Kennedy Ministries, a Christian ministry from Fort Lauderdale, Fla., recently sued the SPLC after being labeled a hate group. The SPLC has also faced criticism from liberals. In late August, anti-Muslim extremism activist and feminist Ayaan Hirsi Ali argued in The New York Times that “the S.P.L.C. is an organization that has lost its way, smearing people who are fighting for liberty and turning a blind eye to an ideology and political movement that has much in common with Nazism.”

For Ali, corporations and donors in Hollywood “need to find more trustworthy and deserving partners to work with than the SPLC.”
Notably, the Pentagon is not the only federal agency to drop the SPLC.

In February, The Daily Caller News Foundation published an exclusive piece indicating that the FBI, which formerly used the SPLC as a “hate crimes resource,” has also been distancing itself from the group.

The SPLC did not respond to a request for comment from The Daily Caller News Foundation by press time.

Leader of White Self-Defense Prison Movement Found Dead

BENJAMIN DAVIS. MURDERED BY THE PRISON SYSTEM.

The New York Daily News is a biased, anti-white operation. The reporting on the death of so-called racist Benjamin Davis is atrocious.

Davis set up a prison “gang” of whites in order to obtain relief from violence perpetrated at will on white prisoners by blacks.

For this, a Colorado judge added another hundred years to his sentence.

Now he’s dead. They lying prison authorities say he killed himself.

NO, ANTIWHITE RACISM AND THE PRISON SYSTEM KILLED HIM.

New York Daily News

The founder of a white supremacist prison gang known as the “211 Crew” died in jail, authorities announced Sunday.

Benjamin Davis’ death is “currently being viewed as a suicide,” said Colorado Department of Corrections spokesman Mark Fairbairn, who declined to detail when or where Davis was found.

The 211 Crew captured national headlines after one of its alleged members, Evan Ebel, assassinated Colorado Department of Corrections director Tom Clements on March 19, 2013.

Ebel, who was disguised as a pizza deliveryman, gunned down Clements in front of his home in Monument, Colo. The parolee was later killed in a gun fight following a police chase in Wise County, Tex.

Teen busted for beating Deandre Harris at Charlottesville rally
A police review of the assassination concluded that Ebel was in contact with multiple members of the 211 Crew before the murder.

“The murder of the Colorado Department of Corrections director was ordered by hierarchy of the 211 prison crew,” a Texas Ranger report of the case concluded.

Davis, 42, established the gang in 1995 in a Colorado prison cell after he was supposedly attacked by a group of black detainees who broke his jaw, according to court records.

“Benjamin’s jaw was so badly broken, he had to hold it up with his hands,” his father, Israel Davis, wrote to a judge in 2007.

“Two inmates were beating him and attempting to throw him over the railing when another black inmate whom Benjamin had known on the street ran up and saved him,” the senior Davis wrote. “Otherwise, he would have been killed.”

As a result, Davis and several other white prisoners “devised a plan” to protect themselves, according to Israel Davis.

They scrawled “211 Gang” with soap on multiple walls throughout the facility.

“Although there were only four of them, the plan was to make it seem as though there were many, many more,” the elder Davis said.

His son long struggled with mental illness, the letter seeking leniency said.

In November 1994, Davis, 19 at the time, went on a robbery spree in Denver, shooting a man during one of the raids.

“He was a skinny kid,” his longtime girlfriend, Kathy Walton, later wrote to a judge in 2007 after he was facing a slew of new charges tied to offenses in prison.

A year later he formed the 211 Crew, which refers to the California penal code for robbery, court records show.

Authorities say the gang grew into a violent force behind bars and on the outside, threatening to kill anyone who crossed them.

Members were tied to smuggling in drugs into prison and anyone who strayed from the group’s strict rules was viciously attacked, prosecutors said.

In December 2004, 19 gang associates were hit with new criminal charges ranging from racketeering, assault and drug-dealing.

The racist group had as many as 300 members at the time, according to a detective investigating the organization.

In 2007, Davis was sentenced to an added 108 years in prison on a racketeering conviction.

“The long and short of it, Mr. Davis, is you don’t need to be on the streets in 40 or 50 years,” District Judge William Robbins said at the time, according to the Denver Post, which first reported his death. “Your prison sentence was supposed to rehabilitate the defendant. It apparently failed miserably.”

He was in jail for a 30-year conviction of a robbery and first-degree assault case, records show.

Christian Group Sues SPLC, Guidestar, and Amazon for Defamation

THE LATE D. JAMES KENNEDY, NAMESAKE OF DJKM MINISTRIES, PLAINTIFF.

MORRIS DEES, LEADER OF SPLC.

JEFF BEZOS, CEO, AMAZON.

The left’s reckless use of the term “hate group” constitutes speech not protected by the First Amendment. The SPLC’s list of hate groups is long. DJKM isn’t one I’m familiar with.

If the credibility of the SPLC can be ruined by a defamation lawsuit, then the plaintiff will have done a tremendous public service. If the SPLC can be totally bankrupted by a Christian group, then you might look at it as the Lord defeating (((Satan.)))

PJ Media

On Tuesday, D. James Kennedy Ministries (DJKM) filed a lawsuit against the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the charity navigation organization GuideStar, and Amazon, for defamation, religious discrimination, and trafficking in falsehood. The SPLC listed DJKM as a “hate group,” while GuideStar also categorized it in those terms, and Amazon kept the ministry off of its charity donation program, Amazon Smile.

“We embarked today on a journey to right a terrible wrong,” Dr. Frank Wright, president and CEO at DJKM, said in a statement Tuesday. “Those who knowingly label Christian ministries as ‘hate’ groups, solely for subscribing to the historic Christian faith, are either woefully uninformed or willfully deceitful. In the case of the Southern Poverty Law Center, our lawsuit alleges the latter.”

The SPLC has labeled DJKM an “anti-LGBT hate group” for its opposition to same-sex marriage and transgenderism. “These false and illegal characterizations have a chilling effect on the free exercise of religion and on religious free speech for all people of faith,” Wright declared.

“After having given the SPLC an opportunity to retract, we have undertaken this legal action, seeking a trial by a jury of our peers, to preserve our own rights under the law and to defend the religious free speech rights of all Americans,” the DJKM president concluded.

The lawsuit laid out charges against the SPLC, GuideStar, and Amazon. “SPLC acted knowingly, intentionally, and with actual malice in publishing the Hate Map that included the Ministry and in publishing the SPLC Transmissions to GuideStar that included the ministry,” the suit alleged. “SPLC’s conduct in making these publications was beyond the reckless disregard for the truth standard required by Alabama law for punitive damages.”

The suit claimed that “the Ministry suffered special damages in its exclusion from the AmazonSmile program as a result of SPLC’s publication of the Hate Map and the SPLC Transmissions.”

Specifically, DJKM brought the suit under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for religious discrimination, under the Lanham Act for trafficking in false or misleading descriptions of the services offered under the ministry’s trademarked name, and for defamation under Alabama common law arising from “the publication and distribution of information that libels the Ministry’s reputation and subjects the Ministry to disgrace, ridicule, odium, and contempt in the estimation of the public.”

The lawsuit explained why the “hate” labeling was so malicious. DJKM’s vision statement runs as follows: The corporation seeks to communicate the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the supremacy of His Lordship, and a biblically informed view of the world, using all available media, so that Jesus Christ would be known throughout all of the Earth and that everywhere He might be trusted, loved, and served.”

In early January of this year, a DJKM employee attempted to register the ministry with AmazonSmile, but was denied after multiple attempts. The program made clear, “We rely on the Southern Poverty Law Center to determine which charities are in ineligible categories,” and explained that DJKM was listed as ineligible.

AmazonSmile support also noted that they “rely on GuideStar to send us information from the IRS,” and that GuideStar’s automated feed included the “hate” designation from the SPLC.

AmazonSmile’s eligibility requirements exclude organizations which “engage in, support, encourage, or promote intolerance, hate, terrorism, violence, money laundering, or other illegal activities,” none of which DJKM engages in, the lawsuit argued.

Wikipedia’s page on D. James Kennedy offers more information about the man and the ministry. There’s nothing in that article to suggest that DJKM is a hate group.

The Trickle-Up Theory Of White Nationalist Thought

Jared Taylor battles it out in words with the SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center) and the Jewish Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in a recent article. The journalist who investigated White Nationalism plays it pretty straight, unlike the typical fake news reporting done by CNN et. al.

The only argument besides labeling race realists as racists that the SPLC is able to make is very weak. Specifically, it claims that Jared lays the intellectual foundation for violence carried out by “White Supremacists.”

Somehow, people can watch horrifying violence in Hollyweird movies and remain calm, but a page of IQ studies that show black IQ to be lower than white IQ sets off the white man to go out and beat up an African-American person. Obviously, where the SPLC would like to go with that nonsense is putting writers like Jared in prison.

This is a long piece and it covers familiar ground, but Jared’s rational mind shines brightly. Even if you think he’s controlled opposition, he’s still able to articulate the notion that white people have rights that are being violated by our government.

KUOW

Jared Taylor was not in Charlottesville, Va., on Saturday. But Taylor, one of the leading voices for white rights in the country, says it was clear what really happened at that rally.

“Anyone who wishes to speak in the name of whites is subject to the heckler’s veto,” said Taylor, founder of the white advocacy website American Renaissance. “There would have been no violence, no problems of any kind if people had not shown up as counterdemonstrators, many of them wearing helmets, wielding batons, wearing shields, shouting for the death of the demonstrators. … This is not something that was provoked by the presence of racially conscious whites. It was something that was provoked by people who hate any white person who has a racial consciousness.”

Two days later, President Trump, in one of his most controversial press conferences to date, described the events — at which hundreds of white protesters gathered for the so-called “Unite the Right” rally and after which a white nationalist sympathizer drove his car into a crowd, killing a counterdemonstrator — in a similar way.

“Let me ask you this,” Trump told reporters Tuesday. “What about the fact that [counterdemonstrators] came charging, with clubs in their hands, swinging clubs? Do they have any problem? I think they do. … You had a group on one side that was bad and you had a group on another side that was also very violent. And nobody wants to say that. But I’ll say it right now.”

Taylor is among a group of educated, white-identity advocates who, critics say, normalize the ideas of white supremacy by couching them in language that doesn’t sound overtly racist. In doing so, those critics say, people like Taylor, authors Kevin MacDonald and Peter Brimelow, and “Unite the Right” organizers Jason Kessler and Richard Spencer sanitize racist tropes to make them palatable to a broad audience, including the upper reaches of the political mainstream.

Continue reading

People Mag Does a Nasty Hatchet Job on Trump Family

People magazine glorifies trash like Kim Kardashian. How dare these jackasses attack the Trump family when they love human sacks of garbage.

The Donald taught his kids to avoid drugs and drink, work hard, and give back to the community. Disagree with Trump’s policies if you must, but leave the smears and slander somewhere else, People.

This junk is getting old.

Philly

It would be unfair to say that People magazine has been totally soft on President Trump. Recall that it was People that published the first-person account of its former reporter, Natasha Stoynoff, who wrote in October that Trump pushed her against a wall and kissed her without consent 11 years earlier. Trump denied Stoynoff’s claim.

Yet when Trump won the presidential election in November, less than a month after Stoynoff went public, People ran a cover that quite literally depicted the victorious billionaire in a glowing light. As Washington Post media columnist Margaret Sullivan put it at the time, “it was a pretty glam treatment.”

Now, however, People is out with a much tougher cover that accuses the Trump family of “SECRETS & LIES.” The contrast between the cover of the new issue and one that featured the future first family in October 2015 (AT HOME WITH THE TRUMPS!) is truly striking.

The latest cover also takes a very different tone from that of an April 2016 issue, which suggested that the “real” Trump might be kinder and gentler than his coarse exterior would indicate.

An accompanying article captured some of Trump’s poorer qualities – he commented on a female reporter’s physical appearance, for example – but the cover made him look pretty good.

Thus, People’s decision to hit Trump on the front of the mag marks a notable shift. Its use of the word “lie” is particularly significant because the term has been a subject of journalistic debate.

The New York Times has decided it is appropriate, in some cases, to characterize false statements made by the president as lies. Similarly, Washington Post articles sometimes describe false statements by Trump as lies when it is clear that he knows the claims are untrue.

The Wall Street Journal, however, maintains that the word is generally not appropriate because it is difficult to know for sure whether the cause of a false statement is deception or an honest mistake. The Post describes false statements by Trump as lies when it is clear that he knows the claims are untrue.

By attaching the word “lie” to Trump on its cover, People is siding with news outlets that have taken the bolder approach of calling out claims that are not true. That is a sharp turn from the magazine’s prior coverage.

“If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor,” said one Barack Hussein Obama. That’s just one among many other lies, such as “shovel ready jobs.” Yet, the press would not call him and his sack of lumpy potatoes wife any names, much less calling him out as a liar.

Hypocrisy?

Much.