New Engineering Study by University of Alaska Confirms 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

The merit to this piece is that a big mainstream news organization is willing to publish in a serious manner a challenge to the official 9/11 story. Israel, the Mossad, and Larry Silverstein, the owner of the WTC, aren’t mentioned. Nonetheless, doubt is cast on the version of events that the American government promotes.

Daily Mail

Next Monday afternoon, Matt Campbell will stand outside BBC Broadcasting House in London’s Portland Place, protesting about the killing of his brother, Geoff, and 66 other Britons, in the 9/11 terror attack at the New York World Trade Centre.

Matt began asking questions. He has not stopped since. He, and others who will be at the BBC protest, refuse to accept the official story about 9/11: that four U.S. airliners were hijacked by Islamist terror chief Osama Bin Laden’s pilots. Two were flown into New York’s famous Twin Towers, which collapsed.

A third rammed into the U.S. Defence Headquarters at the Pentagon in Washington DC. The last went down in rural Pennsylvania, 150 miles north of the capital, after a tussle between the hijackers and passengers, later portrayed in the Hollywood film United 93.

Seven hours later, a third tower at the World Trade Centre, WTC7, fell to the ground over seven seconds, even though no plane had hit it.

The red building, 100 yards from the 110-storey Twin Towers, was less than half their height at just 47 floors, and few people even know of its existence. It had already been evacuated after the planes had hit the main towers.

In total, 2,977 people died, provoking President Bush to mount the ‘War On Terror’ that led to the invasion of Iraq, with the UK in tow.

Yet as Monday’s anniversary approaches, Matt, a former City worker who is married with three children and lives in Sussex, insists that 9/11 did not happen in the way we have been told and that there has been a huge official cover-up to disguise the truth.

‘There are so many questions that the Americans and the British Establishment refuse to answer,’ he says. ‘I believe that my brother and thousands of others were murdered on 9/11 and there has been a cover-up. We, as a family, are still overcoming this tragedy, but we will never stop seeking the truth.’

He is not alone in his quest. A survey in U.S. magazine Live Science last year revealed that most Americans (53 per cent) believe the U.S. Government has concealed — and continues to conceal — vital information about the 9/11 attacks. Crucially, a team of engineers at the University of Alaska concluded this week, after two years of forensic research, that fire could not have caused the collapse of WTC7.

WTC7.

Continue reading

FOIA Dump Reveals Collusion Between Comey’s FBI, Loretta Lynch, and Media to Cover Up Tarmac Meeting Between Lynch and Bill Clinton

The mainstream media isn’t covering the following story. Only a very few Americans will see it and understand. Bill Clinton met with the Attorney General of the United States, one of his old pals, Loretta Lynch, and surely instructed her to make the investigation of Hillary go away. That meeting was supposed to be a secret, but an alert local news crew stumbled upon it and reported it.

After that, the Obama administration worked tirelessly to stifle reporting about the meeting.

They’re all corrupt and they’re all in it together, up to and including Obama himself.

Zerohedge

Back on June 29, 2016, Obama’s Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, tried to convince us that the following ‘impromptu’ meeting between herself and Bill Clinton at the Phoenix airport, a private meeting which lasted 30 minutes on Lynch’s private plane, was mostly a “social meeting” in which Bill talked about his grandchildren and golf game. It was not, under any circumstances, related to the statement that former FBI Director James Comey made just 6 days later [4] clearing Hillary Clinton of any alleged crimes related to his agency’s investigation.

The following local news video of the airport runway meeting has been seen by over 350,000 people.

But, according to a new DOJ FOIA dump just released by the American Center for Law and Justice [5] (ACLJ), it looks increasingly as if nothing reported about this “social meeting” between Lynch and Clinton was grounded in fact…shocking, we know.

First, the new FOIA documents seemingly confirm that the FBI and DOJ simply lied in response to the ACLJ’s initial FOIA request filed back in July 2016. Here is what the ACLJ was told at the time after sending requests to both the Comey FBI and the Lynch DOJ asking for any documents related to the Clinton-Lynch plane meeting:

That said, documents released today by the ACLJ reveal several emails between FBI and DOJ officials concerning the Lynch/Clinton meeting primarily related to how they should go about explaining the train wreck that had just been unwittingly played out on live television courtesy of a local Phoenix affiliate station. Here is a recap from ACLJ:

The documents we received today from the Department of Justice include several emails from the FBI to DOJ officials concerning the meeting. One with the subject line “FLAG” [7] was correspondence between FBI officials (Richard Quinn, FBI Media/Investigative Publicity, and Michael Kortan) and DOJ officials concerning “flag[ing] a story . . . about a casual, unscheduled meeting between former president Bill Clinton and the AG.” The DOJ official instructs the FBI to “let me know if you get any questions about this” and provides “[o]ur talkers [DOJ talking points] on this”. The talking points, however are redacted.

Another email [8] to the FBI contains the subject line “security details coordinate between Loretta Lynch/Bill Clinton?”

On July 1, 2016 – just days before our FOIA request – a DOJ email chain under the subject line, “FBI just called,” [9] indicates that the “FBI . . . is looking for guidance” in responding to media inquiries about news reports that the FBI had prevented the press from taking pictures of the Clinton Lynch meeting. The discussion then went off email to several phone calls (of which we are not able to obtain records). An hour later, Carolyn Pokomy of the Office of the Attorney General stated, “I will let Rybicki know.” Jim Rybicki was the Chief of Staff and Senior Counselor to FBI Director Jim Comey. The information that was to be provided to Rybicki is redacted.

Also of note several of the documents contain redactions that are requested “per FBI.”

It is clear that there were multiple records within the FBI responsive to our request and that discussions regarding the surreptitious meeting between then AG Lynch and the husband of the subject of an ongoing FBI criminal investigation reached the highest levels of the FBI.

Then comes a series of emails between DOJ officials and several mainstream media outlets that appear to reveal collusion to effectively ‘kill the story.”

The first such email involves a Washington Post writer who tells the DOJ’s Director of Public Affairs that he’s hoping to “put it [the story] to rest.”

The next email came from Mark Landler of the New York Times who almost apologizes for even inquiring about the Lynch/Clinton meeting saying that he had been “pressed into service” to write about the topic.

Finally, here is an email where ABC apparently told the DOJ they “aren’t interested” in the Lynch/Clinton story, “even if FOX runs with it.”

Can you imagine all of the stuff we would have learned over the past 8 years if the press pursued the Obama administration and/or the Clinton investigation with even 1/10th of the vigor with which it is currently pursuing Trump?

Evidence the Moon Landings Were Faked

Economics and finance website Zerohedge ran a post yesterday that strays from the usual economics and political news.

One of the sites regular contributors put together some material challenging the American government’s story that American’s landed on the moon in 1969. Commenters at the site offered more evidence, going both ways. If this topic interests you, then click on the link and take a look at the comments as well as the article and videos.

Zerohedge

Did Elon Musk just confirm that the moon landings were faked?

Elon Musk just announced that SpaceX abandons propulsive landing plans for Red Dragon mission to Mars.

In my opinion, we should not be surprised.

NASA supposedly used propulsive landing for the Apollo missions to the moon…in 1969.

I ask you to please click the following hyperlinks to read three articles, carefully, watch one 3-1/3 minute video, closely, and then draw your own conclusions about the Apollo Moon landings that we are told occured nearly 50 years ago.

First, an article from RT, today:

SpaceX abandons propulsive landing plans for Red Dragon mission to Mars [4]

“The reason we decided not to pursue that heavily is that it would have taken a tremendous amount of effort to qualify that for safety for crew transport,” Musk said. “That’s why we are not pursuing it. It could be something that we bring back later, but it doesn’t seem like the right way to apply resources right now.”

Musk added that he did not think that propulsive landing was the best approach.

https://www.rt.com/usa/397023-musk-dragon-mars-propulsive/ [4]

Second, my article from ZeroHedge, last year, 2016:

I like velcro and used to drink Tang, but about the moon, was NASA really full of horseshit? [5]

” My premise is that President Kennedy wasn’t an aerospace engineer, he was a politician faced with the Russians and their satellites scaring the shit out of his constituency. He called our shot, but we couldn’t make it. So they lied.”

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-03-03/i-velcro-and-used-drink-tang-wa… [5]

Third, an article from Physics Professor, Dr. Oleg Oleynik, in 2012, and updated in 2017*:

A Stereoscopic method of verifying Apollo lunar surface images [6]

“Thus, based on the above examples, this study concludes that the Apollo 15 photographic record does NOT depict real lunarscapes with distant backgrounds located more than a kilometre away from the camera.”

“These pictures were, without doubt, taken in a studio set – up to 300 metres in size. A complex panorama mimicking the lunarscape shows degrees of movement, such as horizontal and vertical changes to give an impression of imaginary distance to the objects and perspective.”

http://www.aulis.com/stereoparallax.htm [6]

* Hat tip to Medium Giraffe [7]

Fourth, a youtube video of the Apollo 11 astronaut press conference upon returning from the moon, July 20,1969*:

Apollo 11 Television Press Conference [8]

[8]

* Hat tip to Cognitive Dissonance [9]

Do these three guys, who supposedly just came back from the moon with two of them landing and returning, look and sound like they just came back from the moon?

And here is the full hour and half press conference. Listen to the actual words and sentence structure as well as the body language, which is screaming out-loud disingenuous…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RcKLAo62Ro [8]

What do you think, now?

Peace, liberty, and prosperity,

h_h

The author of this piece, the hedgeless horseman, inserted a link to the same youtube video twice, a mistake. I believe I’ve corrected the error by embedding the full press conference below, which lasts almost an hour and a half.

While researching this post, I also found Dave McGowan’s Wagging the Moon Doggie PDF. This link will allow you to read or download the late Mr. McGowan’s book that hypothesizes that the moon landings were faked.

McGowan was one of America’s most praised conspiracy theorists until he mysteriously contracted a fatal cancer that quickly caused his death. Perhaps his cancer was induced by the federal government–the CIA?

Putin’s Assessment of Trump at the G-20 Will Determine Our Future

THE EXPLOSIONS AND THE PATSY.

Israel, along with Washington’s (((neocons))) are the culprits behind America’s endless wars, according to Dr. Paul Craig Roberts.

Blaming the Israeli attacks on America on 9/11 on Muslims allowed the War on Terror to proceed with no restraints.

PCR questions whether Vladimir Putin has now sized up American President Donald Trump as a Jewish puppet. If he has, then PCR warns that Putin has no choice but to prepare for war.

The excerpt includes approximately the first half of Dr. Roberts’ powerful essay. It goes through proofs that the events of 9/11 were a psyop to drag the U.S. into wars for Israel.

Excerpt from Lew Rockwell

The backdrops to the Putin/Trump meeting are the aspirations of Israel and the neoconservatives. It is these aspirations that drive US foreign policy.

What is Syria about? Why is Washington so focused on overthrowing the elected president of Syria? What explains the sudden 21st century appearance of “the Muslim threat”? How is Washington’s preoccupation with “the Muslim threat” consistent with Washington’s wars against Saddam Hussein, Gaddafi, and Assad, leaders who suppressed jihadism? What explains the sudden appearance of “the Russian threat” which has been hyped into dangerous Russophobia without any basis in fact?

The Muslim threat, the Russian threat, and the lies used to destroy Iraq, Libya, and parts of Syria are all orchestrations to serve Israeli and neoconservative aspirations.

IS HE?

WHAT DOES PUTIN THINK NOW?

Continue reading

Claim: Dutch Police Bribe Newspaper to Bury Data on Criminal Asylum Seekers

PROTEST AGAINST HOLLAND’S NATIONALIST LEADER, GEERT WILDERS.

In America, the newspapers are reluctant to report on illegal alien criminality. In Holland, at least one newspaper wanted the facts.

In America, investigative journalists are sometimes killed. In Holland, it appears bribery is the weapon of choice.

Nowhere in the West do the (((power elites))) want the public to know the truth.

Breitbart

Dutch police hiding statistics revealing asylum seeker’s involvement in crime, even attempting to bribe journalists into ignoring the topic, it has been claimed.

The national police force of the Netherlands admitted trying to cut a deal with the country’s largest newspaper, which claimed to have been offered leads and exclusive stories if they dropped a freedom of information request on the number of asylum seekers involved in crime.

However, the police denied this amounted to a cover-up, claiming they wanted the figures to remain secret as they could be “misleading” to the public. They statistics have still not been published.

“Unfortunately, this approach makes it look like police seek to ignore facts that are socially sensitive. Nothing is less true”, police chief executive Erik Akerboom said in a statement this Monday.

Mr. Akerboom and the force was responding to an article in De Telegraaf, published over the weekend, revealing the underhand deal proposed to them by police.

“Initially, the police had denied to this newspaper that they even collected data on crime among foreigners seeking asylum”, the paper explained, claiming the police then change their reason to “keep the figures under the hat” as the subject “remains taboo”.

The paper said they filed the freedom of information request as they wanted to investigate the cause of a spike in pick-pocketing and petty crime.

The police told them if they did not publish data on asylum seeker’s involvement, “the editors would in return get other news on addressing example pickpockets from safe countries and failed asylum seekers…”

“As icing on the cake we would also get an ‘exclusive interview’ with chief Erik Akerboom about the issue”, they added.

“We will inform De Telegraaf that we will review the [freedom of information] request again”, Mr. Akerboon said, insisting the police “regretted that the newspaper had the impression we wanted to keep them from publishing” and that they had never wanted “to impose silence”.

De Telegraaf pointed out that similar statistics were available in neighbouring Germany, where they had revealed asylum seekers to be disproportionately involved in crime.

Police forces in a number of European nations have been accused of hiding the extent of migrant crime since the begging of the migrant crisis, when the continent struggled to cope with million-plus new arrivals.

After the 2015/16 New Years Eve mass sex attacks in Cologne, Germany, police were criticised for initially not making public the background of perpetrators. The majority were later revealed to be asylum seekers.

And in January 2016, Swedish police were ordered not to release descriptions of criminal suspects that include race or nationality, to avoid being branded racist.

We should all look forward to the day when “racist” has a good connotation–smart, awake, living in the real world, patriotic, nationalist.

Stefan Molyneaux talks about immigrant crime in the Netherlands.

Molyneaux offers lots of data on Holland’s crime problem.

Paul Craig Roberts Warns “Trump Now A Captive Of The Deep State”

I’d like to think that President Trump had good intentions while candidate Trump. It seems to me that the problem, part of it anyway, is that his negative press coverage (91 percent negative) made it impossible to govern without a truce of sorts with the (((Deep State.))) I’d also like to think that he’s playing with their minds and is intent on double crossing them when the time is right.

Zerohedge

When the gullible and insouciant American public and the presstitutes who participate in the deceptions permitted the Deep State to get away with the fairy tale that a few Saudi Arabians under the direction of Osama bin Laden, but without the support of any government or intelligence agency, were able to outwit the entirety of the Western Alliance and Israel’s Mossad and deliver the greatest humiliation in history to “the world’s only superpower” by making the entirety of the US government dysfunctional on September 11, 2001, Washington learned that it could get away with anything, any illegal and treasonous act, any lie. The gullible Western populations would believe anything that they were told.

Continue reading

Inspirational Quote of the Day: One by George Orwell