Breaking! Sweden Drops Rape Investigation of Wikileaks’ Julian Assange

Time

(STOCKHOLM) — Sweden’s top prosecutor said Friday she is dropping an investigation into a rape claim against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange after almost seven years.

The Swedish Prosecution Authority said in a statement Friday that Marianne Ny “has decided to discontinue the investigation.”

Assange took refuge in Ecuador’s embassy in London in 2012 to escape extradition to Sweden to answer questions about sex-crime allegations from two women. He has been there ever since, fearing that if he is arrested he might ultimately be extradited to the United States. Last month, President Donald Trump said he would support any decision by the Justice Department to charge Assange.

WikiLeaks tweeted after the Swedish announcement: “UK refuses to confirm or deny whether it has already received a US extradition warrant for Julian Assange. Focus now moves to UK,”

Friday’s announcement means Assange is no longer under any investigation in Sweden. But the Metropolitan Police said Assange is still subject to arrest for the “much less serious offense” of jumping bail in 2012.

The 45-year-old Australian computer hacker was wanted in Sweden for questioning over a rape allegation stemming from a 2010 visit.

“This is a total victory for Julian Assange. He is now free to leave the embassy when he wants. We have won the Assange case. He is of course happy and relieved. He has been critical that it has lasted that long,” Per E Samuelsson, his lawyer in Sweden, told Swedish Radio. Samuelsson was not immediately available for comments.

Assange still can’t leave the Ecuadorian embassy without being arrested:

Related: Iceland believed the FBI wanted to frame Assange.

Assange supporters fear that he will be extradited to the U.S. and put on trial.

The Truth About FBI Director James Comey: You’re Fired! (Video)

Stefan Molyneaux weighs in with his factual rundown on the firing of FBI Director James Comey.

An hour, published May 11, 2017.

The problem with some of Molyneaux’s videos is that it takes a large investment in time to obtain the information offered. I just let them play in the background while doing other research.

His fans always leave interesting, wry comments. Sample:

Finally, a video where we can get the facts as to why this dope was canned.

It’s amazing the left is trying to compare this to Nixon. Yet they don’t see the parallel of 33k missing emails and 18 minutes of tape. They don’t see the parallel of wiretapping Watergate and not Trump tower.

Just saw CNN’s Wolf deny that there was no one displeased with how Comey ran the FBI. Can you get any worse than this fake news?

Very important video Stef.

For anyone who understands what actually happened (not CNN/MSNBC viewers) this firing was a no brainer.

The MSM is once again exposing itself as an irrational, hyper emotional, deceptive entity who can’t be trusted to accurately convey the simplest of messages to its dwindling, brain dead audience. Bravo sir.

Fantastic, real political commentary. No raging, just the facts and wonderful humour.

When the FBI intentionally murdered Lavoy Finnicum, that is when I really started to hate them. When they murdered a woman holding her baby in her arms at Ruby Ridge… that’s when I really began hating them… when they burned men, women, and children in Waco Texas, I hated them… when they intentionally killed Bob Matthews in a fire I hated them… OK, I guess I have hated the evil bastards of the FBI for years. Nothing new there; and I am sure that I am not the only one who hates them. Yes President Trump, you need to replace them all. The fish rots from the head down… but that rot has had time to spread all the way to the tail.

Yes, and they gave no coverage to yesterday’s big story, the US and Russia meeting with an eye towards ending the Syrian conflict, you know, the war that has ruined a country and caused millions of people to be displaced? How differently they would have played both stories under an HRC administration. MSM are only going to get the Guinness record for longest temper tantrum.

Trump creating jobs…
New opening at FBI

The average American can go to jail for such a small offense Ias stealing a doughnut because you’re hungry.but Hillary Clinton does a wide variety of criminal acts dating back to 20 years +years and nothings going to happen to her!!💩

The whole FBI is a fraudulent institution.

Take Down Trump: Valerie Jarrett Moves into Obama Home as He Signs $65 Million Book Deal

TWEEDLEDEE, TWEEDLEDUMB, AND THE TRANNY.

Hillary Clinton is not the only Democrat plotting the overthrow of President Donald Trump by any means necessary. A few miles from the White House, the Obama residence has become the nerve center for his operation to destroy Trump.

I call it treason.

Excerpt from the Daily Mail

Barack Obama is turning his new home in the posh Kalorama section of the nation’s capital – just two miles away from the White House – into the nerve center of the mounting insurgency against his successor, President Donald J. Trump.

Obama’s goal, according to a close family friend, is to oust Trump from the presidency either by forcing his resignation or through his impeachment.

And Obama is being aided in his political crusade by his longtime consigliere, Valerie Jarrett, who has moved into the 8,200-square-foot, $5.3-million Kaloroma mansion with the former president and Michelle Obama, long time best friends.

Jarrett played a vital – if at times low-key – role in the Obama presidency. She lived in the White House, dined with the Obamas, and help shape his domestic and foreign policies.

Meanwhile, if you were worried about the Obama finances, worry no longer.

Excerpt from Slate

When the Financial Times published a report this week claiming that Barack and Michelle Obama had signed a two-book contract with Penguin Random House for $65 million, eyebrows across the publishing industry moved discreetly upwards. The exact amount of the heftiest book advances are not, as a rule, made public, and the individuals who passed this information on to the Financial Times are identified in that publication only as “people briefed on the auction.” That could mean anything from an employee of PRH to an editor from a competing house repeating something he was told by the agent who called to inform him that he’d lost his bid on the books. If the Obamas really did receive $65 million, it could make theirs the largest book advance ever paid, but skepticism about that number seems widespread.

Could any single book possibly be worth half of that sum? (According to “a publishing official with knowledge of the negotiations” who spoke to Vox, the former president’s book will be a memoir of his years in office while Michelle Obama will write “an inspirational work for young people that will draw upon her life story;” the joint advance might very well not be evenly divided between the two.) The key factor in this deal is the sale of worldwide rights by the Obamas to a company with divisions across the globe, each one of which will have anted up their portion of the total. With international sales, the Obamas’ books could easily sell 5 to 10 million copies, enough to provide a profit for their publisher even if they receive advances of $25 million or even $30 million.

Obama ain’t the brains of this outfit. He ain’t gonna write the book. He ain’t gonna be no leader trying to oust President Trump from the Oval Office.

Obama is the front man in this con. The $65 million deal far outstrips the $10 paid to George W. Bush for his book. One of the commenters at the Daily Mail, which also carried the story of the book deal, calls it money laundering. That’s a good way to put it.

While the anti-Trump machine chugs along, Obama will step forward from time to time to make damning statements about Trump. The rest of the time he’ll be on vacation and playing golf.

He’s lazy. He couldn’t lead his ass out of a paper bag. Valerie Jarrett is his handler. Soros or someone we don’t know about is funding the whole operation. Whoever that person is, he’s surely a member of the (((tribe.)))

Report: Obama’s DOJ Funneled $$ to La Raza, Other Activists via Slush Fund

Who would have guessed that President Obama created a slush fund, filled it with stolen dollars, and then gave the dollars to La Raza and other radical groups.

Clearly, none of that money was spent on teaching Mexicans how to spell. Check out the image above.

Fox News

The Obama administration funneled billions of dollars to activist organizations through a Department of Justice slush fund scheme, according to congressional investigators.

“It’s clear partisan politics played a role in the illicit actions that were made,” Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, told Fox News. “The DOJ is the last place this should have occurred.”

Findings spearheaded by the House Judiciary Committee point to a process shrouded in secrecy whereby monies were distributed to a labyrinth of nonprofit organizations involved with grass-roots activism.

“Advocates for big government and progressive power are using the Justice Department to extort money from corporations,” Judicial Watch’s Tom Fitton told Fox News. “It’s a shakedown. It’s corrupt, pure and simple.”

There is a recent effort by Republicans to eliminate the practice, which many believe was widely abused during the Obama administration.

When big banks are sued by the government for discrimination or mortgage abuse, they can settle the cases by donating to third-party non-victims. The settlements do not specify how these third-party groups could use the windfall.

So far, investigators have accounted for $3 billion paid to “non-victim entities.”

Critics say banks are incentivized to donate the funds to non-profits rather than giving it to consumers.

“The underlying problem with the slush funds is we don’t know exactly where the money is going,” Ted Frank, director of The Competitive Enterprise Institute Center for Class Action Fairness, told Fox News. “Using enforcement authority to go after corporate defendants, DOJ bureaucrats are taking billions away from taxpayers to fund their pet projects overriding congressional preferences.”

Frank said the money should go to the Treasury Department and the process subverts the legislative branch’s essential spending power. The Justice Department has argued that money is allowed to bypass Treasury because the banks’ donations to the groups are voluntary.

Both the Government Accountability Office and Congressional Research Service have concluded that the settlement agreements do not violate Congress’ power of the purse. But others disagree.

“This is real abuse of power,” adds Franks.

For example, in the FY16 Enacted Congressional Appropriation, Congress allotted $47 million for the HUD Housing Counseling, but the Citi and Bank of America settlements shipped in an additional $30 million in funding. The Legal Services Corporation was allocated $385 million from Congress but is getting an additional $412 million in taxpayer dollars from the third-party settlement practice.

The recent Volkswagen settlement, which requires a $1.2 billion investment into zero emission technology, was not only twice denied by Congress but is now expected to receive four times the amount originally requested by the Obama administration.

A sample of the left-leaning organizations benefiting from the largesse include the National Council of La Raza, the National Community Reinvestment Coalition and the National Urban League.

The NCLR and NCR did not return phone calls seeking comment.

GRACIAS MI AMIGOS. YOU MONEY GOT MI VATOS’ SPRAY PAINT.
Mexican gang graffiti--Los Angeles, not Mexico City; wherever there are Mexicans, you have Mexico

Assange: Kremlim NOT Source of Clinton Email Hacks

When you realize that the government is not your friend …

Daily Mail

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange flatly rejected U.S. intelligence claims that his organization received leaked Clinton emails from the Russian government, saying the allegations are part of a ‘foolish’ and ‘dangerous’ effort by Democrats to overturn Donald Trump’s election victory.

‘Our source is not the Russian government,’ Assange told Sean Hannity on his radio show on Thursday, in his first U.S. interview since the election. ‘We have U.S. intelligence saying that say they know how we got our stuff and when we got it, and us saying we didn’t get it from a state.’

Assange said his group has a strict policy against commenting on its sources, but he wanted to dispute allegations that Wikileaks was involved in a Russian-orchestrated campaign to swing the election for Donald Trump.

The CIA believes the Russian government gave Wikileaks hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee and Clinton’s campaign Chief John Podesta to intentionally damage Hillary Clinton. But that view has been questioned by the FBI and the Director of National Intelligence, who say there is not enough evidence to determine Russia’s motivation and whether it gave the documents to Wikileaks.

Assange declined to confirm or deny comments from former UK Ambassador Craig Murray – a close Wikileaks associate – who told Dailymail.com this week that the group’s email sources were American and that he met with one of them in Washington, D.C.

‘We don’t comment on sourcing,’ said Assange. ‘Craig Murray is a former UK ambassador. He is a friend of mine. He is not authorized to speak on behalf of Wikileaks.’

Murray told Dailymail.com that he traveled to Washington, D.C. in September and met with a Wikileaks source in a wooded area near American University.

‘Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,’ said Murray. ‘The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.’

Fake U.S. Embassy Operated in Ghana for a Decade

GIMME MY VISA, WHITE MAN.

Somebody in the American embassy has some explaining to do.

al jazeera

Authorities in Ghana have busted a fake US embassy in the capital, Accra, run by a criminal network that for a decade issued illegally obtained authentic visas, the US State Department has said.

Until it was shut down this summer, the sham embassy was housed in a run-down, pink two-storey building with a corrugated iron roof and flew a US flag outside. Inside hung a portrait of President Barack Obama.

“It was not operated by the United States government, but by figures from both Ghanaian and Turkish organised crime rings and a Ghanaian attorney practicing immigration and criminal law,” the State Department said in a statement released late on Friday.

Turkish citizens, who spoke English and Dutch, posed as consular officers and staffed the operation. Investigations also uncovered a fake Dutch embassy, the State Department said.

Officials in the Netherlands were not immediately reachable for comment on Sunday.

The crime ring issued fraudulently obtained but legitimate US visas and false identification documents, including birth certificates at a cost of $6,000 each, the statement said.

During raids that led to a number of arrests, authorities also seized authentic and counterfeit Indian, South African and Schengen Zone visas and 150 passports from 10 different countries along with a laptop and smart phones.

The statement did not say how the gang obtained the authentic visas. And the State Department did not say how many people were believed to have illegally entered the United States and other countries using visas issued by the crime ring, which used bribery to operate unhindered.

“The criminals running the operation were able to pay off corrupt officials to look the other way, as well as obtain legitimate blank documents to be doctored,” the statement said.

There was no immediate comment from Ghana’s Criminal Investigations Division.

Visa appointments

Visas for Western countries are in high demand in Africa and embassies say the visa market is a big target for organised crime.

The real US embassy in Ghana is a prominent and heavily fortified complex in Cantonments, one of the capital’s most expensive neighbourhoods. Lines of people queue outside each day for visa appointments and other consular business.

The fake embassy was open three mornings a week and did not accept walk-in appointments. Instead, the criminals advertised on billboards in Ghana, Togo and Ivory Coast and brought clients from across West Africa to Accra where they rented them rooms in nearby hotels.

US authorities conducting a broader security operation were tipped off about it and assembled a team including the Ghana Detectives Bureau and police as well as other international partners to shut down the ring.

Hillary’s Contempt for Working White People Cost Her the Dream

HILLARY’S WEAKLINGS.
hillary supporters snowflakdes crying

Piers Morgan is a friend of President-elect Donald Trump. In this column in the Daily Mail he explains why Trump won and Hillary lost.

Although Piers is polite and reserved I think he understands the truth: Hillary Clinton holds us in contempt.

The feeling is mutual, you witch! And we don’t like your pathetic, weak supporters much either.

Excerpt from the Daily Mail

The key issues in this campaign were not climate change, legalising marijuana or gay marriage.

They were the economy, jobs, immigration, and terrorism.

Trump tapped into each of these with clear, defined, loud messages that he rammed home day in day out for 16 months and which grabbed huge media attention.

Love him or hate him, he was constantly speaking about things that Americans really worry about.

He also positioned himself against the corrupt, self-interested, lobby group infested political system that these same Americans feel strongly has enriched itself at their expense.

Hillary Clinton perfectly personified that system; a career politician who has repeatedly fleeced her positions of power to make millions of dollars for herself and her husband, and who carried with her a permanent smug sense of entitlement to be America’s first female president.

I was struck by the sheer scale of cocky complacency which enveloped the Clinton camp in the past few weeks as Election Day approached.

It smacked of precisely the same ‘there’s no way we can possibly lose to these ‘ignorant, racist, sexist Neanderthals’ establishment mentality that provoked Britain into Brexit in June.

Hillary herself dripped with haught, superior arrogance, referring to Trump’s supporters as a ‘basket of deplorables’.

I genuinely don’t think she ever gave any serious thought to losing to someone like Trump, who will now become the only President never to serve in political life or the military.

In that regard, she reminded me of General John Sedgwick, who reassured his Union Army men in the American Civil War as enemy snipers lurked: ‘They couldn’t hit an elephant at this distance….’

General Sedgwick was then promptly shot dead before he could finish the sentence.

Hillary got her come-uppance for failing to identify what was really engaging her fellow, less well-off Americans and for constantly mocking those who were attracted to Trump’s outsider appeal.

I watched all the millennials sobbing in shock at her quickly dismantled ‘victory’ party last night and thought: ‘you all only have yourselves to blame.’

I saw them all tweeting their derision at Trump, snorting with incredulous laughter at what they saw as this idiot clown daring to play in their world.

As Trump roared around Middle America rallying the poor, jobless and downtrodden with increasingly powerful speeches offering hope and change, the Clinton brigade were bopping up and down to Hillary’s celebrity mates like Beyoncé, Lady Gaga and Katy Perry all calling her ‘Madam President’ and saying how wonderful she was.

In the most obscene illustration of this revoltingly elitist back-slapping, Madonna even publicly promised to give oral sex to everyone who voted for Hillary.

An offer than might well have swayed many to vote Trump.

Madonna made me physically gag but so frankly did all the other celebrities sucking up to Camp Clinton.

It showed how detached these people all were from the real world.

Their message was clear: ‘Hillary stands for wealth, fame and success.’

The press congratulated Hillary for her ending her campaign surrounded by fawning celebrities like that a**hole Bruce Springsteen, who claims to represent the working man.

I saw it as more of Hillary surrounding herself with the people whose values I hate. There were also rappers spewing the f-word, calling women whores, twerking, etc.

Meanwhile, at the end, there was Trump with us, his deplorables. We fed off his energy and he fed off ours.

I expect President Trump’s tone will change. It has to as he seeks to govern. But Trump, for all his wealth and vanity, is not going to forget his promise to Make America Great Again.

It all boils down to this: Hillary is a snob, while Trump isn’t.

HILLARY WITH THE PERSONIFICATION OF THE VALUES I REJECT.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/146970485@N04/30770937602/in/dateposted-public/