Jewish “Supergirl” Claims to be World’s Strongest Teen

New York Times

It was Supergirl who stalked up to a heavily laden bar on a recent Sunday morning during a powerlifting competition in New Jersey.

“This is Naomi Kutin, the strongest teenager in the world in both the squat and the dead lift,” said the announcer, Geno Biancheri, the charismatic tournament M.C. known as the Pirate of Powerlifting for his heavy metal ringmaster style.

Naomi squatted more than 300 pounds in a preliminary lift. “That’s twice her body weight, as her opener,” Mr. Biancheri said.

Don’t get too upset with me if I express doubts about the veracity of this story. I suspect there are Aryan teens in Eastern Europe and Russia who are stronger than the Jewish girl. Jews have an inbred desire to claim to be superior in all things. They’re willing to lie, as evidenced by the Holohoax.

Continue reading

Horrific! Teen Undergoes 50 Plastic Surgeries to Look Like Angelina Jolie

SAHAR TABAR. VICTIM OF CELEBRITY WORSHIP.

AN 88 POUND ZOMBIE FROM THE WALKING DEAD.

We’ve commented here before that plastic surgeons have no ethics.

Turning mental cases into monsters who think they look new and improved is one of the major ethical lapses in Western civilization today.

The girl who is featured in this story is Iranian. I would have expected corrupt Western values to have less influence there.

Excerpt from The Sun

THE Iranian teenager who claimed to have had 50 surgeries to make her look like her idol Angelina Jolie has been accused of photoshopping her shocking pictures.

Yesterday, we revealed how 19-year-old Sahar Tabar had been described as a “zombie” after shots from her Instagram went viral.

Instagram users originally considered whether Sahar’s shocking look may be the result of mad make-up skills rather than excessive surgery.

But now the teen, who reportedly weighs just 40kg, has been accused of using computer trickery to make her face appear slimmer and to exaggerate her likeness to Tomb Raider actress Angelina.

In a discussion on Reddit, one user highlighted odd distortions around the super-fan’s head which seem to point to evidence of photoshopping.

The photo of Sahar, posing with her cheek piercings in, shows the Iranian teen lying on furniture which is clearly warped – suggesting the photo has been edited using computer software.

A commenter suggested: “I do believe she got plastic surgery, but it’s more or less makeup and extremely exaggerating her features that she got done.”

Another pointed to two Instagram posts, uploaded 24 hours apart, which show Sahar with two very different looks.

In one video, her face is much fuller, her nose is less upturned and her lips are less exaggerated.

But a second snap shows her with a much more gaunt appearance and greatly exaggerated facial features.

Viewers reckon that these very different looks could be down to a combination of computer editing and extreme make-up, although it’s difficult to know for sure.

Many of her 500,000 Instagram followers post mean comments in response to Sahar’s shocking selfies.

One said: “Her: Doc make me look like an 8 month old corpse. Doc: Say no more”

Meanwhile, other critics have compared her look to the Corpse Bride.

If she’s achieving her corpse look via makeup, she should be in Hollywood doing makeup work for the film studios.

On the other hand, if she’s had 50 plastic surgeries, the question becomes what is the source of funds to pay the surgeons.

Before:

Sahar was a very attractive teen until she fell in with butchers. What they’ve done to her is criminal. She reminds me more of Michael Jackson than Angelina Jolie.

Kudos to all women who resist the siren song of the plastic surgeon.

Vile (((Lena Dunham’s))) Virtue Signaling About Rape Refuted by FACTS

Disgusting, nasty human being Lena Dunham defended one of her writers against a rape accusation last week. When others are accused, she’s ready to pile on.

She admitted in her book to molesting her kid sister.

She’s garbage.

The facts about rape accusations offered in this excerpt reveal at least some truth about FALSE rape accusations.

The Federalist

The recent hysteria over sexual assault has resulted in some delicious comeuppance for some of the most self-righteous among us. The best example of this is Lena Dunham.

In August, Dunham tweeted: “Things women do lie about: what they ate for lunch. Things women don’t lie about: rape.” When someone responded, pointing out that “10 percent of all rape allegations are false,” Dunham modified her claim, writing: “The actual number, while hard to track, is much closer to 3%.”

Dunham’s claim is dangerously misleading, as the number of “false accusations” refer only to reports that have been filed with police and proven to be false. Seeing as it’s nearly impossible to prove a negative, this number is likely lower than it should be.

This percentage (whether you believe it’s 2 percent, 3 percent, or 10 percent) doesn’t apply to accusations that can’t be proven one way or the other. The same studies that found 2 percent (or 7 percent in the example I’m using for the following numbers) or so to be proven false also find that another 8 percent are “unfounded/baseless,” meaning they don’t meet the criminal level of offense or were improperly coded as sexual assault.

Another 18 percent are considered “informational” and don’t meet the definition of a crime. Another 29 percent are labeled “suspended” because there wasn’t enough evidence to say a crime occurred. Another 18 percent involve identifying a perpetrator but something “beyond the control of law enforcement” keeps them from making an arrest, such as a lack of victim cooperation.

A chart linked to the study I cited above breaks down what happens after an arrest is made. One-third of those cases are rejected by the prosecution, another 21 percent are dismissed with all charges dropped, and another 2 percent are dismissed without dropping the charges. Two percent went to trial and were found “not guilty,” a third resulted in a guilty plea, 6 percent went to trial and were found “guilty,” and another 3 percent were classified as “other.”

So using the same logic as Dunham and others who flaunt this statistic, one would only be able to say that a smaller or equal number of accusations turn out to be “true” (as in, someone pled guilty or was found guilty at trial). But Dunham and others imply that the statistics mean 98 percent of accusations are definitely true, thus we should never doubt one.

Those of us who follow the explosion of accusations on college campuses against young men have wondered what would happen if Dunham herself, or someone close to her, were accused of sexual assault. It turns out she’d abandon that “women don’t lie” claim real quick. When her “Girls” writing partner Murray Miller was accused of sexual assault last week, Dunham defended him. She and “Girls” executive producer Jenni Konner wrote that Miller was the victim of a “misreported” accusation.”

After intense backlash (and a reminder of what she once said), Dunham apologized for the timing of her statement. It’s still likely she believes Miller was falsely accused. It’s very easy to take sides when something happens to other people, but when it happens to you or someone close to you, that can change. Dunham learned this the hard way.

Mestizo Texan Accused of Sexually Assaulting Five Foster Children Took in 180 Girls

MIGUEL BRISENO. ALLEGED PEDOPHILE FOSTER PARENT.

In the Tex-Mex culture, and I believe in Mexico, the male of the household has a right to sex with any female who happens to be around, including his daughter. Age is no barrier either.

This story is not just a story of an adult having sex with teens, but also a story of government corruption.

You should know that San Antonio is located in Bexar County. Medina County is just west of Bexar County. Both counties are about half Mexican.

My San Antonio

A Medina County man accused of sexually assaulting five former foster children, including several in Bexar County, took in more than 180 young girls over a five year period, officials said.

That leads investigators to believe there could be numerous other victims who have yet to come forward.

“It’s not a question about whether there are more,” said Medina County Sheriff Randy Brown. “It’s just about how many.”

One additional victim has already come forward since news broke Wednesday of 58-year-old Miguel Briseno’s arrest, Brown said, bringing the unofficial total to six victims. A charge has not been filed in the sixth alleged case.

Briseno, who is currently being held in the Medina County Jail on a $500,000 bond, was a licensed foster parent from 2005 through 2010, Brown said. During that time he lived in both Bexar and Medina counties.

Over the course of the five years, more than 180 girls passed through his care, Brown said. At various times, Briseno was reportedly taking care of up to 12 girls at once.

Brown said Child Protective Services contracted with a third-party company, who has not yet been publicly identified, to place the girls in Briseno’s home.

“Those girls were taken from some environment and then you have some jackass like him abusing these girls that already have troubles,” Brown said. “I’m aggravated at the whole system. I’m aggravated at the company that placed these girls. It was a money-making deal, the way they were running those girls through there like livestock. It wasn’t about making a better world for them. They were making a profit off them.”

Representatives of Child Protective Services could not immediately comment on the relationship with the company.

Two of the charges against Briseno are out of Medina County, and the remaining three originated in Bexar County. Brown said Briseno first became a foster parent while living in Von Ormy, where the alleged assaults occurred, and later moved to Devine, Texas, in Medina County.

Wednesday’s arrest was not the first time Briseno was arrested on child sex abuse charges. In April 2013, the Medina County Sheriff’s Office arrested him on a charge of solicitation to commit sexual assault of a child. The arrest came after one of Briseno’s foster children said he had sexually assaulted her in August 2012, when he no longer had a foster license, Brown said.

It is not clear why Briseno did not have a license after 2010 and how Briseno still had foster children in his care two years later, though investigators discovered Briseno had attempted to move his foster parent license into his wife’s name, Brown said.

“It’s not a loophole, it’s just downright wrong,” Brown said.

Briseno pleaded guilty in September 2015 to a reduced charge of attempted assault, a Class B misdemeanor. Brown said investigators and prosecutors had difficulty securing testimony against Briseno. He was sentenced to 180 days in jail, though county officials couldn’t confirm how much time he was actually incarcerated.

Brown said his office, as well as other investigating agencies like the Texas Rangers, plan to look into the unnamed third-party company responsible for placing the children in Briseno’s care. They’re also working to determine whether his wife could be held criminally responsible.

All of Briseno’s reported victims were teenagers at the time of the alleged abuse. They’re now in their 20s. For investigators, the next step is to identify the dozens of remaining girls who were ever in Briseno’s care.

“We don’t know where they’re at,” Brown said.

“If you’ve stayed at that house, if you were a foster child [in Briseno’s care], please contact us,” he said. “Whether you feel something inappropriate happened or not, we’d still like to talk to you.”

Victims are asked to call 210-335-8477 if they have any information on Briseno’s alleged abuse.

It’s the mark of a system out of control that the Mexican could run 180 girls through his home in just five years. That must have been quite a party for him.

I did some research on how much a foster parent is paid to take in a child. In Texas it’s $675 per month per child. For the creep in this story that adds up to $97,200 per year. I’m not certain whether that income would be tax free or not, but believe me, it’s way more than the average Texan earns.

The corruption that everyone knows is integral to Mexico is now firmly entrenched in the U.S. It’s a hidden cost of diversity that is increasingly not so hidden.

Arrested Pedophile Corrections Officer Admits that “Cheese Pizza” is a Reference to Child Porn

Prison guard Stephen Salamak wanted to meet up with an eight girl old for a free sex session. Instead, he was arrested. At least, he’ll know people in prison when he’s sent to the big house.

Press of Atlantic City

NEWARK — An officer with the state Department of Corrections was arrested and charged with receiving images of child pornography, acting U.S. Attorney William E. Fitzpatrick announced Thursday.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Homeland Security Investigations agents arrested Stephen Salamak, 37, of Lodi, Bergen County, at his home. According to the complaint, Salamak used multiple email accounts to seek and obtain explicit images of underage children.

In May, an undercover law enforcement officer responded to a Craigslist ad, placed by Salamak, seeking “Woman/Moms that are into Cheese Pizza.” The complaint said Salamak communicated with the undercover officer and requested photos of an 8-year-old child. In July, authorities executed a search of Salamak’s email account, finding he communicated with multiple people about pornography and pedophilia.

A search warrant of Salamak’s home was executed on Thursday, where admitted to authorities “Cheese Pizza” was a reference to child pornography, he knowing received emails containing child porn and knowingly communicated with various individuals regarding child pornography and pedophilia.

Salamak was employed as a corrections officer at East Jersey State Prison in Rahway.

According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the charge of receiving child pornography carries a mandatory minimum sentence of five years in prison with a maximum potential penalty of 20 years and a $250,000 fine.

More sordid details of Salamak’s sexual preferences can be read here.

UK Public Schools Forcing Girls As Young As Four To Wear Muslim Veil

TAYYIBAH GIRLS SCHOOL, LONDON.

At this point in the Islamification of the West, it should surprise no one that Muslims will try to impose their will on weak Western governments. Traditional Britain has disappeared in London for the most part.

In this article, based on a Sunday Times investigation, we learn that public funds are being used to impose Islamic customs on children.

When the British decided that God was optional, God reciprocated. Soon, all British people will be forced to worship a false God.

Zerohedge

Research published in The Sunday Times this week revealed that eight state-funded British schools are forcing children to wear the Islamic hijab along with other Muslim female dress code requirements, which includes girls as young as four. The findings are based on open source investigations into published dress code directives of 176 Muslim schools across Britain, most of which are private.

However, the new discovery of public schools among them has sparked outrage across the UK, especially as three of the schools are elementary level schools (including kindergarten). According to The Sunday Times:

Girls as young as four are being “forced to wear the hijab” as part of approved school uniform in state-funded Islamic schools, campaigners have told ministers.

According to research by the National Secular Society, the hijab appears to be compulsory in eight state-funded Islamic schools in England, including three primary schools.

A further 51 private Islamic schools of the 176 surveyed by the society also require the headscarf to be worn by female pupils. Eighteen schools said wearing the head covering was optional.

Shockingly, one particular school called the Independent Olive Secondary requires that, “Hair should be covered by a black scarf; outside the School the face must be covered,” while another UK school is explicit in stipulating that, “It is very important that the uniform is loose fitting and modest and that the hijaab is fitted closely to the head. The College uniform is COMPULSORY” (sic). The Tayyibah Girls School in London warns: “The school is not willing to compromise on any issues regarding uniform.”

Meanwhile, some schools go so far as to recommend the niqab. For example girls at Al-Ihsaan school in Leicester are told they must wear either a “jilbaab or niqab”. The jilbaab is a long and loose-fitting gown which covers the entire body expect for hands, face, and feet. But the niqab recommendation is much more significant in that it is practiced by only a small minority within the Muslim world – it covers the entire face except for the eyes, and is typically worn with black garments with cover head to toe.

In addition to the eight publicly funded schools which require head coverings of veils, thirteen others cite an optional hijab as part of their uniform policy. Islamic academies in Britain came under scrutiny early this month when a previous Times story first reported that “Thousands of state primary schools are allowing girls as young as five to wear the Muslim religious headscarf as part of approved school uniform, a Sunday Times survey has revealed.”

The earlier investigation found that even Church of England associated schools were increasingly adopting various forms of Islamic dress as acceptable among students:

Last month a survey by The Sunday Times revealed that nearly a fifth (18%) of 800 state primary schools, including Church of England primaries, in 11 regions of England now list the hijab as part of their uniform policy, mostly as an optional item.

Feversham College is a high school level academy specializing in Science for Muslim girls aged 11-18 years. It’s website spells out that a “close-fitting” hijab is “COMPULSORY” (sic).

Activists associated with the investigation cited by The Sunday Times called the uniform requirements “illiberal and repressive” and stated, “no child should be obliged to wear the hijab or any other article of religious clothing while at school.” Included among those appealing to the UK education secretary to root out such practices, especially when they appear at state funded schools, are Muslim women activists.

Of course, it’s mostly a good thing when the state leaves private religious schools alone to do or require whatever they want in terms of dress code, but that state funded UK schools would enforce Muslim veils is the deepest hypocrisy in a country which has recently been known to target and punish families wanting to opt out of LGBT related curriculum. The British authorities have even threatened Orthodox Jewish schools with closure with the ultimatum: “teach your children about homosexuality and gender reassignment, or we will close you down.”

In a trend that began years ago, the British education secretary began warning even Christian private schools that their teaching curriculum must reflect the “UK values” and laws concerning transgender recognition. The government now routinely cites “combating extremist” as a motive for getting private schools to conform.