Paleomasculinist Responds to Bitchy Feminist Mocking Masturbation

The Tweet above reminds me that sex robots have been in the news lately, along with all other manner of sexual behaviors. The cultural Marxist assault on morality roars along at warp speed now.

I’m not recommending that men form relationships with sex robots or sex dolls, but the constant taunting of men by feminists is going to backfire on them.

Certainly, Muslim males don’t put up with women’s sh*t, although as we’ve seen in a few stories posted here, white feminist SJWs believe it’s a good thing to be raped by Muzzies. It takes away their white guilt through some mysterious, insane process of redemption.

As the Tweet suggests, sex robots are an alternative to both masturbation and putting up with bitchy, unloving, unkind feminist whores. There’s still a problem for men, however.

Sex robots as marriage partners or lovers offer a cowardly way of life. There are significant MORAL ISSUES akin to the issues associated with having sex with animals or dead people. In short, I think we need to think twice about taking an amoral perspective on sexual relationships with robots.

The only real answer to the woes imposed on our culture by Jewish feminism is to destroy feminism. Taking away women’s rights to a degree and imposing on women a moral perspective on life is the only thing that can remake our culture into something decent.

That naked feminist and her stupid sign above is rightly mocked and ridiculed. Disempower her.

Quartz

In the face of AI exerts repeatedly predicting the rise of sex robots, it’s increasingly difficult to insist that such machines strictly belong to a far-off, dystopian future. But some robotics experts predict we’ll soon be doing far more than having sexual intercourse with machines. Instead, we’ll be making love to them—with all the accompanying romantic feelings.

At this week’s “Love and Sex with Robots” conference at Goldsmith University in London, David Levy, author of a book on human-robot love, predicted that human-robot marriages would be legal by 2050. Adrian Cheok, computing professor at City University London and director of the Mixed Reality Lab in Singapore, says the prediction is not so farfetched.

Uh-oh, my Jewdar just went off.

jewdar-gif

“That might seem outrageous because it’s only 35 years away. But 35 years ago people thought homosexual marriage was outrageous,” says Cheok, who also spoke at the conference. “Until the 1970s, some states didn’t allow white and black people to marry each other. Society does progress and change very rapidly.”

And though human-robot marriage might not be legal until 2050, Cheok believes humans will be living with robot partners long before then.

Though Cheok acknowledges that sex robots could fulfill sexist male sexual fantasies, he believes robot-human marriages will have an overwhelmingly positive effect on society. “People assume that everyone can get married, have sex, fall in love. But actually many don’t,” he says. And even those who do might be in search of a different option. “A lot of human marriages are very unhappy,” Cheok says. “Compared to a bad marriage, a robot will be better than a human.”

Notice that the author promoting sex with robots is a (((Jew))). Typical. Jews are leading whites down another dead end road that will lead to our extinction.

Although white men are demonized by feminists at the Huffington Post, on college campuses, on TV and the movies, we need to hang together and get our balls out of asses (sorry for the crude way of putting it) and confront these nasty women, as well as the Jews who seek our death as a race.

Just as importantly, we need to appreciate the good women in our lives.

LIVING NATURAL.

Man Claims “Ageism” Over Starbucks Ban for Flirting with Teen Barista Who Flirted with Him

Creep and creepy are words that feminists use like the word “nigger” to label white men who just might accidentally have an erection now and then. The man in this story that is starting to take off in the media likes younger women. That seems to be a criminal offense now.

KREM

SPOKANE, Wash. — A Spokane man took to Facebook after he was banned from a Spokane Starbucks.

The man, who we will not identify due to the fact he has not been charged with a crime, said last week he was at Starbucks on Main Street in Downtown Spokane. He said wrote a note asking out a barista. He said she is 16 years old. He is 37 years old.

“I was flirted with by a barista. For some reason she thought I was funny. Said I was funny. So I gave her a note to see if she’d be interested in dinner,” said the man in a public Facebook post that has since gone viral, with almost 4,500 shares and almost 3,000 likes.

He said he went into the same Starbucks the next day and a Spokane Police officer told him he was banned from that Starbucks location. Apparently, Starbucks management thought something in the note was inappropriate enough to get the police involved.

If the bolded phrase isn’t enough to keep you out of Starbucks, you’re hopeless.

The police get involved when a girl doesn’ want to go out with a man? That’s ridiculous.

“I know the female Starbucks barista was of legal age to date. I broke no laws. I merely took a chance with my heart. I’m tired of hearing the word “creep” as any black person or gay person is tired of hearing certain words. I have a whole webpage dedicated to age gap love,” said the man.

Philosophically, I take the position that any man has the right to ask out any female and she has the right to politely reject his request for a meet up. However, the phrase “legal age to date” is probably not a valid phrase. Our heart-driven Lothario in this case should probably confine his dating to age 18 and up. However, his take is not creepy nor does it justify police involvement.

He said he feels he is being discriminated against because of his age. He asked his Facebook friends to call and complain to Starbucks.

But his call-to-action was met with some strong opposition.

Many people commented on Starbucks’ page applauding them for banning the man. Others commented on their own personal experience in the service industry. Even people who don’t go to Starbucks commented in support of the ban.

Man haters gonna hate.

fat feminist protester gif

And the conversation reached far beyond Spokane. People commented from Texas, Pennsylvania and Massachusetts. And internationally as well, from Canada, Mexico and even the UK.

A Starbucks spokesperson said the company supports how management handled this situation.

“We have no tolerance for any such inappropriate behavior or harassment, and we will continue to support our store partners and local authorities investigating the situation,” said the Starbucks spokesperson.

But Starbucks did get some criticism on their page. One person said tossing him out was a little rash, and it seems excessive.

Spokane Police said any business has a right to refuse service to anyone for however long they choose. So Starbucks was legally allowed to ban the man from that location.

The last sentence is bullsh*t. (((Starbucks))) has no legal right to ban anyone because of their race or sexual orientation. Unless your race is white and your sexual orientation is heterosexual, aka NORMAL.

Swedish Feminist Loses Her Job Because Of Her Man-Hating Facebook Videos

EliSophie Andrée

Free men are free to speak the truth as they see it. Thus, it’s disturbing that men are being fired (Curt Schilling) for bucking the System.

My position favors absolute free speech that is nonthreatening and only expresses politically incorrect opinions. However, it’s still enjoyable to read about an unappealing feminist maggot who’s been fired for her man hating videos.

Excerpt from Return of Kings

EliSophie Andrée got a job as a receptionist at a physical therapy clinic in Helsingborg, Sweden. But when her boss, a woman, found out she had posted radical feminist “poetry” videos on Facebook, she told her to pack up her things and go home.

Continue reading